Categories
Business

John J. Sweeney, Crusading Labor Chief, Is Useless at 86

John J. Sweeney, a New York union researcher who climbed the height of the American labor movement in the 1990s and led the AFL-CIO through an era of dwindling union membership but increasing political influence, died Monday at his Bethesda home , Md. He was 86 years old.

Carolyn Bobb, an AFL-CIO spokeswoman, confirmed the death. She did not give the cause.

From 1995 to 2009, Mr. Sweeney served as president of the country’s largest trade union federation – 56 unions with 10 million members by the end of his term – and with thousands of volunteers, he strengthened the political forces of the work and helped elect Barack Obama to the 2008 presidency. Over the years, he also helped elect Democrats to seats in Congress, governorates, and state legislatures across the country.

Its more difficult task of revitalizing and diversifying the wavering labor movement itself had the weight of history against it.

For decades in the 20th century, work had not welcomed women, African American, Latinos, or Asian-Americans, and had often resorted to overtly discriminatory tactics to maintain white male dominance in the workplace. Significant but unequal gains have been made since the civil rights era in the 1960s, when unions began removing “whites only” clauses from their constitutions and statutes.

But Mr. Sweeney, still faced with one-sided demographics, planned a fundamental change. He cruised to bring women and minorities into the group, often in leadership positions; Alliances with civil rights groups, students, university professors and clergymen; and advocated low-wage workers, moving away from the AFL-CIO’s traditional emphasis on protecting the highest paid union jobs.

In Mr. Sweeney’s campaign for the federal presidency, Linda Chavez-Thompson, the daughter of a Texas stock trader, was his assistant to the newly created post of Executive Vice President. She was the first member of a minority to ever be elected to the top management positions of organized workers.

The 1995 vote itself was unique: it was the first election in the history of the Federation created in 1955 by the merger of the American Federation of Labor and the Congress of Industrial Organizations after a long alienation.

An initiative signed by Sweeney encouraged the recruitment of thousands of immigrants into his unions. Many members have long been hostile to undocumented workers, accusing them of stealing union jobs and pulling down the wage scales. Mr Sweeney blamed such conversations as discriminatory and called for justice that included better treatment of underpaid immigrants and a path to illegal citizenship for those in the United States.

Critics claimed that Mr. Sweeney’s policies were anchored in a liberal past, employing mid-20th century civil rights and union strategies to organize 21st century internet literate workers. Mr Sweeney denied this claim, just as he had rejected companies moving jobs overseas and denounced the hostilities many young workers had expressed against old-line unions.

In a labor movement that had declined since 1979 when union membership peaked at 21 million, Mr Sweeney urged his unions to significantly increase spending on the organization. He often said that his first priority was to reverse the long slide and significantly expand the base of the labor.

By the time he resigned in 2009, his vision of a dramatic boom in union formation comparable to that of the late Depression of the 1930s and post-war 1940s had not materialized. In fact, America’s total union membership had dropped from 15 percent of the workforce to about 12 percent, a trend that has continued since then, according to the United States Labor Statistics Bureau.

“Given the optimism workers’ movement felt in his 1995 election, I find it hard not to be disappointed with the results,” Richard W. Hurd, professor of industrial relations at Cornell University, told The New York Times at the Year 2009. “How much of that you can attribute to John Sweeney is a whole other question.”

In an outgoing interview with The Times from his Washington office – looking across Lafayette Park to the White House, where he spoke to President Bill Clinton in the late 1990s and more recently Mr Obama – Mr Sweeney was optimistic about The Big One The recession, which had lasted for over a year and had already resulted in thousands of layoffs, continued to win the union ranks.

“I think the recession will make people feel that they cannot solve their problems by themselves and that they have to take care of the organization,” he said. And discovering his father was a unionized New York bus driver, he learned a childhood lesson.

“Because of the union, my father got things like vacation days or an increase in wages,” he said. “But my mother, who worked as a domestic servant, had no one. At a young age I learned the difference between organized and independent workers. “

John Joseph Sweeney was born in the Bronx on May 5, 1934, to James and Agnes Sweeney, Irish Catholic immigrants whose struggles in America had shaped John’s social perception from an early age. The boy had accompanied his father to many union meetings where he learned of class and job differences, as well as union efforts to improve wages and working conditions.

He attended St. Barnabas Elementary School and graduated from Cardinal Hayes High School in the Bronx in 1952. When he grew up he decided to find a future in organized work. He worked as a gravedigger and doorman (and joined his first union) to pay his way through Iona College, a Catholic school in New Rochelle, NY, where he received a bachelor’s degree in economics in 1956.

He worked briefly as an employee at IBM, but took a drastic wage cut to become a researcher at the International Ladies Garment Workers Union in Manhattan. He met Thomas R. Donahue, a union representative for the Building Union Employees International Union, Local 32B, who persuaded him in 1960 to join his union as a contract director. Mr. Sweeney would face Mr. Donahue 35 years later to run for the top worker position.

In 1962, Mr. Sweeney married Maureen Power, a schoolteacher. She survived him with their children John Jr. and Patricia Sweeney; two sisters, Cathy Hammill and Peggy King; and a granddaughter.

The construction workers union was one of the most progressive of its time, representing 40,000 porters, doormen, and maintenance workers in 5,000 commercial and residential buildings in New York City. The contracts guaranteed pay increases, health insurance, college scholarships for members’ children, and demands employers make and encourage employees regardless of race, creed, or color.

Mr. Sweeney rose through the ranks and was elected President of Local 32B of the renamed Service Employees International Union in 1976. Soon its 45,000 members struck thousands of buildings for 17 days and gained significant increases in wages and benefits. He later merged Local 32B with Local 32J, the caretaker, and again proposed contract improvements in 1979.

In 1980, he was elected president of the 625,000-member national SEIU and began moving his base to Washington with unions of public officials and office, healthcare and hospitality workers. He pushed for stricter federal health and safety laws and spent large amounts of money organizing new members. By 1995 it represented 1.1 million union members and was a national power in the labor movement.

Work was at a crossroads. Years of frustration with Lane Kirkland, AFL-CIO president since 1979, stalled in a 1995 uprising by union presidents. Mr. Kirkland, whose internationalist vision of work had made him a hero of the Polish solidarity movement but left him unmoved, even hostile to proposed reforms for unions at home, was forced to resign.

In the 1995 election, Mr. Sweeney ran against Mr. Donahue, his old friend of Local 32B, who had risen to become Federation Treasurer and who appeared to be the heir to Mr. Kirkland. But Mr. Donahue’s ties to Mr. Kirkland forced him to defend the status quo, and Mr. Sweeney’s continuing demands for growth and change won the presidency with 57 percent of the delegates, representing 7.2 million members.

He was re-elected for four further terms of two to four years each, the last time in 2005 when he broke a promise not to remain in office beyond the age of 70. He retired in 2009 at the age of 75 and was succeeded by Richard L Trumka, his longtime secretary and treasurer and former president of the United Mine Workers.

In a statement posted on the AFL-CIO’s website on Monday, Mr Trumka said of Mr Sweeney: “He was led into unionism by his Catholic faith and not a single day went by meeting the needs of the work didn’t put people first. John viewed his leadership as a spiritual calling, a divine act of solidarity in a world plagued by distance and division. “

Mr. Sweeney wrote an essay titled “Retrospect, Progress: My Life in the American Labor Movement” (2017) and was the co-author of two books, America Needs Elevation: The Fight for Economic Security and Social Justice. (1996, with David Kusnet) and “Solutions for the New Workforce: Guidelines for a New Social Contract” (1989, with Karen Nussbaum).

In 2010, President Obama awarded him the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the country’s highest civilian honor. “He has revived the American labor movement,” Obama said at a ceremony in the White House. “He emphasized union organization and social justice and was a powerful advocate for American workers.”

Alex Traub contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

U.S. Airstrike Kills High ISIS Chief in Iraq

BAGDAD – American air strikes on a joint mission with Iraqi forces killed the leading Islamic head of state in Iraq. This attack aimed to contain the group’s resurgence and seek retaliation for a deadly suicide attack in Baghdad last week.

ISIS commander Jabbar Salman Ali Farhan al-Issawi, known as Abu Yasser, was killed on Wednesday near the northern Iraqi city of Kirkuk, the American-led military coalition and Iraqi officials said on Friday.

The Islamic State no longer owns any territory in Iraq, but has continued to carry out deadly attacks. The question of what kind of violence is required to keep the group at bay has been at the center of the US and Iraqi negotiations to reduce the number of US troops in Iraq, and shows America’s role in the raid this week that Iraq continues to rely on the US US military.

A coalition spokesman, Colonel Wayne Marotto, described the death of Mr. al-Issawi as “a severe blow” to the efforts of the Islamic State to regroup.

Mr al-Issawi coordinated the group’s operations in Iraq, anti-terrorism experts said. Colonel Marotto said he was responsible for developing and disseminating guidance to ISIS fighters and for expanding ISIS presence in Iraq.

He said nine other ISIS fighters were killed in the operation.

Colonel Marotto said Iraqi counter-terrorism forces were leading the operation with the support of the coalition’s air, intelligence and surveillance coalition.

The American-led coalition has a policy not to comment on which countries are carrying out certain air strikes. But senior Iraqi security officials, who asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to post the information, said US planes carried out the strikes.

Iraqi officials said the attack on an underground hideout avenged the deaths of 32 Iraqis killed in the ISIS attack on a market in Baghdad last week. More than 100 others were injured in the attack, the deadliest in Baghdad in four years.

ISIS took responsibility for the bombing, saying it was targeting Shiite Muslims and Iraqi security forces.

“We have promised and fulfilled,” Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi tweeted about the operation in which Mr al-Issawi was killed. “I gave my word to persecute Daesh terrorists. We gave them a thundering answer,” he said, using an Arabic acronym for ISIS.

Mr. al-Kadhimi, a former intelligence chief, also replaced several heads of intelligence and security operations following the ISIS attack, saying it was partly to blame for lax security and intelligence errors.

Mr. al-Kadhimi took office last year and pledged to strengthen security, fight corruption and implement government reforms.

Iraqi and American officials said the operation that killed Mr. al-Issawi lasted months as they approached lower-level ISIS leaders in mountain hideouts near Kirkuk and received information on what appears to be a new center of ISIS operations collected there.

Mr. al-Issawi, originally from the Iraqi city of Fallujah, returned to Iraq six months ago across the porous border to the Kurdish-controlled sector of eastern Syria.

In addition to the air strikes, the operation also included raids by Iraqi counter-terrorism forces in ISIS guest houses, according to an Iraqi military statement.

Although the last major ISIS attack in Baghdad took place two years ago, the group conducts regular operations in provinces further north.

“The information showed that this man was an active coordinator of Islamic state operations,” said Michael Knights, Jill and Jay Bernstein Fellow of Security and Military Affairs at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. “Iraq is probably still the largest operating environment for ISIS, which effectively means he is the country manager of the largest subsidiary.”

At its height, ISIS controlled almost a third of Iraqi territory and all of Syria province after declaring a caliphate with Mosul as its capital in 2014. American-backed, Kurdish-led troops drove the group out of the last territory they owned two years ago, near the city of Baghuz in Syria.

The assassination of Mr. al-Issawi “shows the Iraqi people that the government is capable of effective action,” said Mr. Knights.

Crucial American aid in the raid came amid increasing political pressure from pro-Iranian groups in Iraq to evict US troops from the country.

After the recent cuts by the Trump administration, the United States still has about 2,500 soldiers on three Iraqi military bases. While Iraqi capabilities in the fight against ISIS have improved, the country still relies on intelligence, surveillance equipment and air support from the US-led coalition.

“From an operational standpoint, it is important that ISIS is disrupted as much as possible, but it obviously needs a lot of follow-up,” said Sajad Jiyad, an Iraq-based employee with the Century Foundation. “ISIS has shown that it is quite resilient and can show up in small cells, especially in rural areas and difficult terrain, and also targets areas that are very difficult for Iraqi forces to monitor.”

Mr Jiyad said he believed that helping US forces with operations against ISIS would gain goodwill. But he said the US drone attack that killed a senior Iraqi security officer along with Iranian commander General Qassim Suleimani in Baghdad last year had more weight in strengthening opposition to American forces in Iraq.

Following the drone attack, the Iraqi parliament passed a resolution calling on the government to evict American forces from Iraq. This step was not implemented.

“The presence of US forces is part of a larger problem unrelated to Daesh,” Jiyad said. “These kinds of things can’t just be washed away. The US has been helpful against ISIS.”

Eric Schmitt contributed to coverage from Washington.

Categories
World News

With Concessions and Offers, China’s Chief Tries to Field Out Biden

A trade pact with 14 other Asian nations. A promise to work with other countries to reduce CO2 emissions in order to combat global warming. Now an investment agreement with the European Union.

China’s leader, Xi Jinping, has been doing business for the past few weeks, pledging to position his country as an indispensable global leader, even after dealing with the coronavirus and increasing readiness to fight at home and abroad damaged his international standing.

In doing so, he underscored how difficult it will be for President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. to forge a united front with allies against China’s authoritarian policies and trade practices, a key focus of the new administration’s plan to compete with Beijing and Beijing Review The increasing performance. The picture of Mr Xi, who joined in a conference call with Chancellor Angela Merkel from Germany, President Emmanuel Macron from France and other European heads of state and government on Wednesday to seal the agreement with the European Union, was also a stinging accusation against the efforts of the Trump administration to isolate China’s Communist Party state.

The deals show the leverage that Mr. Xi has due to the strength of the Chinese economy, which is now growing the fastest among major nations as the world continues to grapple with the pandemic.

Noah Barkin, a China expert in Berlin at the Rhodium Group, described the investment agreement as a “geopolitical coup for China”. Chinese companies already had better access to European markets – a core complaint in Europe – and thus gained only modest openings in manufacturing and the growing renewable energy market. The real achievement for China is diplomatic.

China only had to make modest concessions to overcome increasingly vocal concerns about China’s toughest policies, including crackdown on Hong Kong and the mass imprisonment and forced labor of Uyghurs in Xinjiang, western China.

China agreed, at least on paper, to relax many of the restrictions on European companies operating in China, open China to European banks, and comply with international standards on forced labor. The question is whether the commitments can be enforced.

For China’s critics, Mr. Xi’s steps were tactical – even cynical. However, they have also proven successful to an extent that seemed impossible just a few months ago, when several European countries became more open against China.

“It would be wrong to see these Chinese concessions as a major change in policy,” said Barkin. “In the past year we have seen how the party got the economy more firmly under control, doubled itself compared to state-owned companies and started a new boost for independence. That is the direction of the policy that Xi has set and it would be naive to believe that this deal will change that. “

Instead, China has shown again that it pays little or no diplomatic costs for abuses that violate European values. For example, Europeans signed the investment deal the day after the European Union publicly criticized a Chinese lawyer who reported on the first coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan city.

Australia faced a similar compromise in November when it signed the Asian Trade Pact, the regional comprehensive economic partnership, despite China waging a campaign of economic coercion against the country.

China’s tremendous economic and diplomatic influence, especially at this time of global crisis, means that countries feel they have no choice but to embark on it, regardless of their uneasiness about the nature of Mr. Xi’s harsh rule. The Asian trade pact, for example, although limited in scope, involves more people – 2.2 billion people – than any other.

“The values ​​that we all hold in our Sunday speeches must be adhered to if we do not want to fall victim to a new systemic rival,” said Reinhard Bütikofer, a German member of the European Parliament who has spoken out against the European investment agreement with China .

“I think understanding is increasing,” he added, “but how to respond is not yet clear.”

China’s overtures will not end anger over its repressive policies, including the documented use of forced labor. However, they could appease China’s critics by seizing the lure of commercial profit in a country whose economy has recovered more from the pandemic than any other.

It would also undermine Mr Biden, who has already had four years of frustration in Europe to overcome President Trump’s standalone approach in facing China’s actions at home and abroad.

“I think now is a very good window for us,” said Wang Huiyao, president of the Center for China and Globalization, a think tank in Beijing. He said China could serve as a role model and partner in the cooperation, and suggested that Europe could play a moderating role between China and the United States.

“Everyone has seen China’s resilience, vitality, tenacity and stability, especially through its fight against the epidemic,” he said.

Of course, Mr. Xi did not acknowledge that any policy by China has undermined global confidence. The officials have also not signaled a renewed review of their core policy.

The country’s “Wolf Warrior” diplomacy, named after two jingoistic action films, shows no signs of indulgence. Australia is still exposed to China’s wrath, as is Canada over the US imprisonment of the chief financial officer of Chinese tech giant Huawei.

“I think they are taking a selective approach to improving their image,” said Minxin Pei, a professor at Claremont McKenna College in California.

In the long term, it remains to be seen how much China’s pacts and pledges will improve its international image, which collapsed this year due to its disguise due to the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan.

A poll by the Pew Research Center in October found that in 14 economically advanced countries, unfavorable attitudes toward China had reached their highest levels in more than a decade. A median of 78 percent of respondents said they had little or no confidence that Mr. Xi would do the right thing in world affairs. (An advantage for Mr. Xi: 89 percent felt the same way about Mr. Trump.)

China’s economic recovery has nevertheless given Mr. Xi a diplomatic opening, and he has seized it. Mr. Xi’s pledges to accelerate China’s carbon emissions reduction, which he began in September, have received international praise, even if the government is still unsure of how to wean itself off coal and other highly polluting industries.

At around the same time, Mr. Xi showed renewed interest in finalizing discussions on the seven-year European investment agreement. Just months earlier, a deal seemed as good as dead in the face of mounting hostility towards China in Europe. “There are real differences and we are not going to document them,” said Charles Michel, President of the European Council, in September.

A breakthrough came after the American presidential election. Mr Trump showed contempt for America’s traditional allies in Europe and Asia, but Mr Biden has pledged to form a coalition to meet China’s economic, diplomatic and military challenges.

China clearly foresaw the potential threat.

Just two weeks after the election, China signed the regional comprehensive economic partnership with the 14 other Asian nations. In early December, after phone calls with Ms. Merkel and Mr. Macron, Mr. Xi urged that the investment agreement be concluded with the Europeans.

The prospect raised alarms in both Europe and the United States. Mr Biden’s new National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, went on Twitter to insist that Europe should wait for consultations with the new government first – to no avail.

Critics said the deal would tie Europe’s economy even closer to China’s, helping Beijing build economic power and divert external pressure to open up its party-state economy.

They said the agreement did not do enough to address China’s human rights abuses, including labor rights. The promise that China’s negotiators have drawn on this issue to “make continued and sustained efforts” to ratify two international conventions on forced labor requires that China act in good faith. Critics have been quick to point out that China has not kept all of the promises it made when it joined the World Trade Organization in 2001.

The investment agreement has to be ratified by the European Parliament before it can enter into force and there is considerable opposition that it could derail. At the moment, Chinese officials are celebrating a deal that Mr. Xi described as “balanced, of high standard and mutually beneficial.”

“The Chinese leadership is concerned about a transatlantic front, a multinational front, and I think they are ready to make tactical concessions to get the Europeans on board,” said Barkin of the Rhodium Group. “You were very smart.”

Claire Fu contributed to the research.

Categories
Business

Main Arts Group Chief Steps Apart Amid Office Complaints

Robert Lynch, executive director of Americans for the Arts, the powerful national advocacy group, has resigned following complaints and investigations into the organization’s equity and diversity practices and workplace management.

Mr Lynch, who has held a leadership role there for more than three decades, will take paid leave, the group’s board of directors said in a statement on Wednesday. “It has been shown that despite our best efforts, we have not achieved our goals of leading, serving, and promoting the various networks of businesses and individuals who practice the arts in America,” the statement said.

Mr. Lynch, 71, was a prominent advocate of resources for nonprofit arts organizations. He was also a member of the Biden-Harris Transition Team for Arts and Humanities. His departure from his position at AFTA, where his annual compensation package was reported to be over $ 900,000 in tax returns, was voluntary and effective immediately, the statement said. (Mr Lynch’s work with the Biden-Harris transition team is complete, a spokesman said.)

His absence should enable a thorough review of AFTA, which has over $ 100 million in foundation assets. “It is Bob’s firm belief – one regrettably shared by the Board of Directors – that the most appropriate course of action at this time is to proceed with the investigation without the distraction and in the best interests of the mission of the organization and the field.” Statement said.

The move comes after a growing chorus of criticism from current and former AFTA staff and advisory board members who said the organization has failed to fulfill its mission regarding diversity, equity and inclusion. There were also complaints about sexual harassment and a management culture based on intimidation rather than transparency. Critics had asked Mr. Lynch to resign because he had not responded to the problems they listed for a long time. The excitement was also the subject of a report in the Washington Post earlier this week that detailed the issues, including reports of widespread reprisals among senior executives.

In recent months, as calls for diversification of AFTA’s leadership and better service to creative communities and paint artists increased, the group publicly defended its actions and promised to do better. It is one of several arts organizations, large and small, that have recently been forced to reckon with a history of inequality in their ranks and programs.

In its statement, AFTA said it will now be the subject of two independent investigations, one by law firm Proskauer Rose regarding the work environment and one by consulting firm Hewlin Group, which focus on AFTA’s policies and procedures regarding diversity will, equity and inclusion.

A retired former board member, U.S. Army Brig. General Nolen Bivens will lead the group as interim president and managing director, the board said.