Categories
Politics

Cuomo to signal regulation stripping emergency his Covid powers

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo rejected calls to resign Sunday after new allegations of inappropriate workplace behavior were raised. However, he will sign a bill that removes his emergency powers to fight the Covid-19 pandemic as he faces growing political pressure from his own party.

The Democratic governor, who grappled with waves of criticism and called for his resignation over dueling crises in his government, also vowed that he would “not be distracted” in the fight against Covid.

“I am signing the State Emergency Powers Act today and I will implement it today,” Cuomo said on a conference call with reporters.

Cuomo said he would take this step with the “major change” that will allow Empire State restaurants outside of New York City to increase indoor dining capacity from 50% to 75%.

“The numbers have gone down. If the numbers have gone down, we’ll adjust the economic reopening valve,” said Cuomo.

The change will be implemented on March 19, according to the governor. But he warned: “If the numbers change, if something happens, if there is a downturn, then obviously we will adjust.”

Cuomo is under fire amid a growing number of allegations of sexual harassment or inappropriate workplace behavior, as well as an ongoing scandal over his government’s handling of care home deaths in Covid.

New York Senate majority leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins ​​on Sunday called for Cuomo’s resignation after two more women were added to the file to accuse the governor of inappropriate behavior.

“Every day there is a different report that stands out from the government business,” said Stewart-Cousins.

“We have allegations of sexual harassment, a toxic work environment, the loss of credibility related to the Covid-19 nursing home data and questions about the construction of a major infrastructure project.”

“New York is still in the midst of this pandemic and still facing the social, health and economic repercussions,” she said. “We have to govern without daily distraction. For the good of the state, Governor Cuomo must resign.”

Carl Heastie, the Democratic spokesman for the New York State Assembly, said in a statement Sunday that he “agrees with Stewart cousins” on the governor’s ability to continue running this state.

“The allegations about the governor that have been reported over the past few weeks have been deeply troubling and have no place in government, at work or anywhere else,” said Heastie.

“We face many challenges and I think it is time for the governor to give serious thought to whether he can effectively meet the needs of the people of New York.”

But Cuomo was defiant earlier on Sunday when he was riddled with questions about several women’s allegations, including two more who came up on Saturday.

“There are some lawmakers suggesting that I step down on allegations,” Cuomo said. Some members of Cuomo’s own party, including Senator Alessandra Biaggi, have asked him to resign.

“I was elected by the people of this state, I was not elected by politicians. I will not resign on charges,” he said.

“The premise of resigning on allegations is indeed anti-democratic,” added Cuomo. He urged people to let New York Attorney General Letitia James conduct her independent investigation into harassment claims before drawing any conclusions.

“Let the attorney general do her job. She’s very good, she’s very competent. And that’s going to be a due process and then we’ll have the facts,” he said.

“There is no way I can step down,” added Cuomo. “But I won’t let that distract me either … We have a lot to do.”

When asked about Biaggi in particular, Cuomo replied: “I have a flash of news for you: There is politics in politics.”

“I have political differences with people,” said Cuomo, also with some Democrats and Biaggi. “But they don’t override the will of the people. They don’t override elections. They cannot hear an allegation and decide on the allegation,” he said.

– CNBC’s Dan Mangan contributed to this report.

Categories
Business

Proposed E.U. Legislation Goals to Rectify Gender Pay Hole

BRUSSELS – The European Union urged member states to close the gender pay gap and on Thursday announced details of a legislative proposal requiring companies to disclose gender pay gaps in wage interviews and giving applicants access to salary information. It would too Providing women with better tools to fight for equal pay.

The move takes place as workers all over the world were disproportionately affected by the economic effects of the coronavirus crisis and could lead to sanctions against companies that does not correspond.

The proposed law would also allow women to verify that they are being adequately compensated versus male colleagues. The European Commission, the bloc’s executive branch, wants to give workers the opportunity to apply for appropriate compensation in the event of discrimination.

Under the proposed law, those who believe they are victims could take action through independent observers of compliance with the equal pay requirements. You could also raise gender pay complaints through employee representatives either individually or in groups.

“You need transparency for equal pay,” said Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the Commission, who had undertaken to make pay transparency binding after taking office in December 2019. “Women need to know whether their employers treat them fairly. And if they don’t, they must have the power to fight back and get what they deserve. “

Although in theory the principle of equal pay for equal work is one of the basic values ​​of the European Union of 27 countries, the difference in salaries for men and women doing the same work is 14.1 percent and the difference in pensions is 30 percent. said the commission. According to the European Institute for Gender Equality, a research group, female managers earn a quarter less than men.

Despite several efforts to enforce equal pay in practice, it appeared to be inaccessible to women across the bloc for more than 60 years, which is a beacon for human rights and equality. So far, only 10 European countries, including Austria, Germany, Italy and Sweden, have introduced national legislation on wage transparency.

The proposed EU-wide law requires the approval of the member states and the European Parliament. There are concerns that it could be blocked by national governments, as has happened with the European Commission’s proposal to introduce gender quotas on boards of directors. Faced with these potential obstacles, Vera Jourova, the bloc’s top official for values ​​and transparency, described the pay proposal as “pure pragmatism and good economic calculations”, stressing that companies benefit from gender equality at work.

“We see quite limited appetites in some Member States and surprisingly in those who have already put such measures in place,” said Ms Jourova. “What gives me hope is that this is badly needed.”

Companies with more than 250 employees would be required to publicly disclose their gender pay gap, reflecting the concerns of smaller organizations that have suffered a severe economic blow from the coronavirus.

“I am aware that in times of economic downturn and the uncertainty caused by the pandemic, this proposal may seem out of date for some,” said Helena Dalli, the bloc’s equal opportunities commissioner, and stressed that the law was “appropriately proportionate ” be.

Under the bill, national governments would be required to penalize companies that violate equal pay measures. Governments could decide on the penalties imposed, including financial sanctions, which must be effective and proportionate, the commission said.

The suggestion comes as researchers warn that the virus could significantly delay women’s progression in the workplace. According to the 2020 Women in Work Index, which is compiled annually by PricewaterhouseCoopers in 33 industrialized countries, advice, economic damage caused by the pandemic and the effects of government policy have a disproportionately high impact on women. This has reversed the steady trend of gains for women in employment and resulted in what the consultancy calls “shecession”.

Women’s rights groups welcomed the Commission’s initiative. “Information is power: Pay transparency would enable employees to know the value of their work and to negotiate salaries accordingly,” said Carlien Scheele, Director of the European Institute for Gender Equality. “This would help combat discrimination in the workplace, which can only be a boon to gender equality.”

Aware of the possible legal and economic implications of the proposal, employers carefully assessed it and blamed it on what they described as profound reasons for gender inequality.

“Appropriate compensation transparency requirements can be part of the answer,” said Markus J. Beyrer, head of BusinessEurope, a lobby group. “However, the key to improving gender equality is addressing the root causes of inequalities, particularly gender stereotypes, labor market segregation and inadequate childcare.”

Mr Beyrer said the Commission must respect the “competences of the national social partners” and “should not add undue burdens to human resource management and pave the way for inappropriate litigation”.

According to Ms. Jourova, “binding rules” are required, not just trust in social responsibility Companies. “We see it’s going nowhere,” she said.

Categories
Entertainment

When Does Regulation & Order: Organized Crime Premiere?

The newest entry in the Law & Order Franchise, Law & Order: Organized Crimeis finally almost there. The closer we get to the premiere date, the more we learn about the premise and cast of the show – but when does it actually premier? The new show is part of NBC’s mid-season program, which will arrive on Thursday, April 1st at 10 p.m. ET / 9 p.m. CT.

Like most major networks, due to production delays related to the COVID-19 pandemic over the course of 2020, NBC has pushed back much of its “fall” programs to actually debut in early 2021. Law & Order: Organized Crime is broadcast right after his parent’s show, Law & Order: Special Victims Unit on Thursday evening. There is a suitable schedule there Organised crimeThe protagonist is Detective Elliot Stabler (Christopher Meloni), who was there regularly SVU for twelve seasons before leaving the show in 2011. Before Law & Order Doubleheader, NBC will have a one-hour comedy block on Thursdays.

Law & Order: Organized Crime is one of only two new full-length dramas to debut for NBC this shortened season; The other is the science fiction drama debris). In fact, new shows across the network are pretty slim! NBC has also debuted three comedies – Lord Mayor, Young skirt, and Kenan – but that’s it in terms of scripting. It’s not surprising as most networks stick with what they know in ever changing times.

Bringing back Stabler has long been on the wish list of Law & Order Fans, that’s why it’s especially exciting to see him run his own show! Not many details have been released about what is bringing Stabler back. The official NBC synopsis of the show reads simply: “Detective Elliot Stabler (Christopher Meloni) steps back into line to take on New York’s most devious crime syndicate with a new task force after a devastating loss that left him to the core shaken, Stabler has to rebuild his life. ” and careers in an evolving criminal justice system that faces its past and works to get things right. “We can’t wait to see what Stabler has been up to for the last decade since he’s been on our screens, and it won’t be long before we find out!

Categories
Politics

Mexican Regulation Halts U.S. From Turning Again Some Migrant Households

WASHINGTON – A Mexican law prevented the United States from quickly turning away immigrant families on one of the busiest stretches of the southwest border and forced agents to resume releasing families into the country, according to three government officials from Biden.

The Trump administration began rejecting migrants entering the US in March, citing the coronavirus threat, and the emergency rule effectively sealed the border from asylum seekers. Due to a law that Mexico passed in November banning the detention of immigrant children and families, the country has stopped accepting such families from South Texas, an area normally prone to illegal crossings.

The recent postponement has alerted Homeland Security officials and poses an immediate challenge to the Biden government. Homeland Security officials said the emergency rule was necessary to prevent the spread of the coronavirus in detention centers along the border, even if it prevented vulnerable families from hearing their asylum applications. In recent weeks, increasing numbers of families have been held in such facilities in the Rio Grande Valley and Del Rio, Texas.

Stephanie Malin, a Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman, said due to pandemic precautions and social distancing guidelines, some facilities have reached full “safe holding capacity”.

“CBP takes the safety and wellbeing of its workforce and those they encounter very seriously and we are taking even more precautions due to Covid-19,” said Ms. Malin. “As always, the number of people crossing the border continues to fluctuate and we are adjusting accordingly.” She said the agency is working with organizations in the community to release migrants into the public domain.

The United States has turned back more than 390,000 migrants to Mexico or their home countries since March. The ruling reduced the number of migrants detained on the U.S. side of the border, but it also put Central American families in trouble when they learned that their children had been taken to Mexico, in violation of international treaties. And while politics was a crucial part of the Trump administration’s attempts to close the border to migrants, the rule also had the unintended effect of giving migrants more chances of illegal entry.

Customs and Border Protection recorded more than 73,000 crossings in December, up from more than 40,000 in July. Agents arrested more than 40,000 migrants in December 2019.

Mexican law, which went into effect in January, doesn’t apply to the entire border. American border officials still reject single adults, and so do families in places like Arizona, officials said. It is unclear how the law will affect other parts of the border.

A State Department spokesman in Mexico declined to comment on whether it had stopped accepting migrant families, saying only that the United States continued to have the pandemic emergency rule.

However, Biden’s administration was unable to return migrant families to Reynosa, Mexico, a change first reported by the Washington Post. The relocation has raised concerns among Customs and Border Protection about a possible increase in family crossings into the neighboring Rio Grande Valley. Border crossings in recent years have been fueled mainly by Central American families fleeing persecution, violence and poverty.

The Department of Homeland Security is currently building a tent complex in Donna, Texas to house migrants. However, an administrative official said this was not related to the law in Mexico. Customs and Border Guard said in November it would close the main McAllen detention center for renovations.

President Biden campaigned for asylum restoration on the southwestern border and this week signed an executive order directing the government to roll back President Donald J. Trump’s restrictive policies.

The new government has not publicly announced when the pandemic emergency rule will be lifted. After a federal judge in the District of Columbia lifted a blockade on the rule that prevented the United States from turning away unaccompanied migrant children, the White House said it would use its own discretion to decide when to apply the policy.

Mr Biden said in December that his administration would take a cautious approach to reversing Trump-era policies to avoid a surge on the border.

His immigration plan was to rely more on programs that migrants follow after their release to the United States to ensure they appear before immigration tribunals, rather than on their detention.

Mexico, for its part, praised the fact that it had imposed restrictions on those detained.

“Mexico is taking a crucial step towards ending child detention and we are encouraged by this promising development,” said Gillian Triggs, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

While top Trump administration officials argued their emergency rule was just an attempt to prevent the spread of the coronavirus, Mr Trump’s White House attempted to use the policy to advance its goals of curbing illegal immigration.

Kirk Semple contributed to coverage from Mexico City.

Categories
Politics

Biden brother touts relationship in Inauguration Day advert for regulation agency

President Joe Biden’s brother, Frank, promoted his relationship with the Commander-in-Chief in an Inauguration Day advertisement for the law firm he advised.

Frank Biden is a non-attorney senior advisor to the Berman Law Group. The company is based in Boca Raton, Florida. The Frank Biden ad was printed in the Jan. 20 Daily Business Review, also based in Florida.

The ad focuses on a lawsuit the company is bringing against a group of sugar cane companies in Florida. It includes a photo of Frank Biden as well as quotes on his relationship with the new president and family name.

In an email to CNBC, Frank Biden said he didn’t use his brother’s name to attract customers.

“I’ve never used my brother to get clients for my company. Our company has been involved for a long time [with] this lawsuit. Social justice is something I’ve been involved in for years, “said Frank Biden.” I will never be employed by a lobbyist or lobby company. “

After CNBC emailed the firm’s co-founders, Matthew Moore, one of the Berman Law Group’s attorneys, responded on behalf of the firm. CNBC asked the company if Frank Biden would continue to use the Biden name in future advertisements while his brother was president. The company’s answer provided no answers to these questions.

“Frank Biden has been with the Berman Law Group for years. He is committed to social justice and campaigns against corporate sizes that fall victim to the little guy,” said Moore in an email. “The Big Sugar Fall has been around for more than two years and it’s the flagship of corporate influence. We are honored to have Frank Biden with us as our social justice leader,” he added.

A White House spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.

Following the publication of this story, a White House official in Biden told CNBC that the president’s name should not be used in any commercial activity that suggests any form of endorsement or support.

“It is the policy of this White House that the president’s name should not be used in connection with any commercial activity, to suggest his endorsement or support, or to be understood in any way that could reasonably be implied,” the official said late Wednesday opposite CNBC.

The main focus of the ad is promoting the company’s work on a class action lawsuit against a group of sugar cane farmers in South Florida. The ad and Biden himself highlight the relationship with his brother, who is now president, as a reason to partner with the company.

“The two Biden brothers have long been committed to bringing environmental issues to the fore. The president-elect has vowed to rejoin the Paris Agreement and wants, for example, to set ambitious targets for reducing greenhouse gases,” the ad said in the newspaper.

“My brother is a role model for how to do this job,” says Frank Biden in the ad. “One of its central tenets is that one should never question or blame another man or woman’s motives. That way you avoid creating an inequality that prevents any clash. You can, of course, make the judgment of one Question people, and that’s what We bring to justice. “

The ad suggests that Frank Biden Company engaged because of Biden’s “reputation and motivation for engaging with philanthropic, social and environmental issues that arose”.

It then lists the company’s 800 phone number, along with contact information for Frank Biden and the company’s founders. The firm’s website states that they specialize in not only class actions, but also corporate law, real estate law, and government relations.

This is not the first time Frank Biden has announced his family name while his brother was in a position of power.

ABC News covered at length early last year on many occasions when he used his name to support affiliated companies and groups. In 2011, Frank Biden referred to his last name when his brother was vice president.

Politico and other outlets reported other attempts by members of the Biden family, including President’s son Hunter and his other brother James, to use their last name in business opportunities during the 2020 presidential election. Hunter Biden announced in December that he was being investigated by the Delaware federal prosecutor’s office on his “tax affairs”.

The January 20 ad with Frank Biden raised some concerns among political ethics experts.

Richard Painter, chief White House ethics attorney in the George W. Bush administration, said that while Frank Biden has the right to promote the Biden name, it doesn’t look good on him or the government.

The painter said either Biden or administrative officials should encourage Frank Biden not to use her name and convey the message to senior officials not to bother with him.

“The Biden White House must have a very strict protocol on the use of the Biden name,” Painter said in an interview with CNBC on Wednesday. “Brothers, law firm employees, and anyone else who uses the Biden name should not address the president or anyone else who works with the president.”

While working in the Bush administration, Painter worked as part of a team of attorneys who contacted legal representatives of Bush family members and employees to encourage them not to use their last name for business purposes.

Categories
Business

Grindr is fined $11.7 million below European privateness regulation.

The Norwegian Data Protection Agency announced on Monday that it would punish Grindr, the world’s most popular gay dating app, 100 million Norwegian kroner, or about $ 11.7 million, for illegally disclosing private information about its users to advertising companies.

The agency announced that the app had transmitted the exact locations, user tracking codes and the name of the app to at least five advertising companies, with people in violation of European data protection law being essentially marked as LGBTQ without their express consent. Grindr shared users’ private data with MoPub, Twitter’s mobile advertising platform, among others, which, according to the agency, can exchange data with more than 100 partners.

Tobias Judin, head of the international division of the Norwegian Data Protection Agency, said that Grindr’s data mining practices have not only violated European data protection rights, but also seriously endangered users in countries like Qatar and Pakistan where consensual same-sex sexual acts take place could be illegal.

Recognition…Ilya Hendel

“If someone finds out that they are gay and knows their movements, they can be injured,” said Judin. “We’re trying to make these apps and services understand that this approach – not informing users, not getting valid consent to share their data – is completely unacceptable.”

The fine comes a year after European nonprofit groups filed complaints against Grindr and its advertising partners with data protection authorities. In testing last January, the New York Times found that the Android version of the Grindr app was exchanging location information that was so precise that it pinpointed reporters on the side of the building they were sitting on. In April, Grindr revised its user consent process.

In a statement, a spokesperson for Grindr said the company has received “valid legal approvals from all” of its users in Europe on multiple occasions and is confident that its “approach to protecting user privacy in social apps is top-notch”.

The statement added: “We are continuously improving our data protection practices with a view to evolving data protection laws and regulations and look forward to a productive dialogue with the Norwegian Data Protection Authority.”

The company has until February 15 to comment on the ruling before it is final. The Norwegian agency said it was investigating whether the advertising companies that received user data from Grindr also violated European data protection law. “

Privacy experts said the ruling would have far-reaching implications beyond dating apps.

“Not only does this set limits for Grindr,” said Finn Myrstad, director of digital policy at the Norwegian Consumers’ Council, one of the groups that made the complaints, “but it sets strict legal requirements for an entire industry that benefits from collecting and sharing . ” Information about our preferences, location, purchases, physical and mental health, sexual orientation, and political views. “

Categories
Politics

Distinguished Attorneys Need Giuliani’s Legislation License Suspended Over Trump Work

Dozens of prominent lawyers have signed a formal complaint requesting the suspension of Rudolph W. Giuliani’s bar license – the latest and loudest in a series of calls to reprimand him for his actions as President Donald J. Trump’s personal attorney.

The lawyers said Mr Giuliani crossed ethical boundaries in helping Mr Trump prosecute false allegations of election fraud and then delivered an incendiary speech reiterating those claims just before the January 6 uprising at the Capitol.

A draft complaint to the New York Supreme Court Appeals Committee accuses Mr. Giuliani of knowingly making false allegations about the election and calls for an investigation into “conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deception or misrepresentation in or outside the court” .

Demands for Mr. Giuliani to be disciplined have increased in the weeks since the uprising and are only increasing now after Mr. Trump stepped down. The latest complaint, signed by a non-partisan who-is-who of legal figures from New York and beyond, is possibly the most serious condemnation of Mr Giuliani’s conduct to date.

The list included former acting US attorney general Stuart M. Gerson, former US district judges H. Lee Sarokin and Fern M. Smith, and two former attorneys general, Scott Harshbarger of Massachusetts and Grant Woods of Arizona. The complaint was also signed by prosecutors working for the same United States law firm for the Southern District of New York that Mr. Giuliani ran in the 1980s, including Christine H. Chung.

Ms. Chung, a member of the steering committee of Lawyers Defending American Democracy, the organization that made the complaint, said the group had reviewed Mr. Giuliani’s work on behalf of Mr. Trump and that it was a “targeted campaign for the going.” with a lie about a stolen election from the American people. “

“This is a man who once ran the highest law enforcement agency in this nation and he knows what is fraud and what is not,” said Ms. Chung, who did not work for the US law firm during Mr. Giuliani’s tenure. She added, “It is forbidden for a lawyer to attack the rule of law and it is dangerous.”

Ms. Chung said that by Thursday afternoon, more than 500 people had signed the complaint, which anyone could sign on the Lawyers Defending American Democracy website, and that she expected “thousands” more to add their names.

The complaint seeking the suspension of Mr Giuliani’s admission to exercise his right during an investigation into his conduct is one of several complaints that have been lodged with the Board of Appeal. It comes a week after New York Senator Brad Hoylman, chairman of the judiciary committee, urged the state judicial system to begin the formal process of revoking Mr. Giuliani’s legal license.

It could take months or even years to conduct the investigation and determine an appropriate sentence, largely due to procedural hurdles and the complexity of Mr Giuliani’s case, said Stephen Gillers, a law professor at New York University and an expert in legal ethics.

Mr Gillers said he hoped the court would conduct a thorough investigation suspending Mr Giuliani’s license as Mr Giuliani used his reputation as a lawyer to spread false accounts.

“It is a privilege and an honor to be a New York attorney, and in investigating Giuliani and possibly sanctioning him for his behavior, the courts are reiterating that fact,” Gillers said.

Mr Giuliani, who did not respond to requests for comment, discussed the complaints about his behavior on his radio show last week.

“I’ve been a prosecutor all my life – I’m not stupid,” he said. “I don’t want to get in trouble. And personally, I have a great sense of ethics. I hate it when people attack my integrity. “

In the weeks since the insurrection, Mr Giuliani also redoubled his allegations of electoral fraud, arguing on conservative talk radio and social media that the masses indicting the Capitol were left-wing radicals who were involved in a conspiracy around him and To discredit Mr. Trump.

The numerous demands for disciplinary action underscore the extent to which Mr Giuliani’s reputation has grown since his years as Federal Prosecutor for Organized Crime and his two terms as Mayor of New York City, during which he advocated law enforcement and emphasized cleaning, has changed the streets.

At Mr Trump’s rally on Jan. 6, not long before a violent mob stormed the Capitol, Mr Giuliani called for a “trial by battle” to address his discredited allegations of electoral fraud.

“I am ready to maintain my reputation, the president is ready to strengthen his reputation because we will find crime there,” said Giuliani.

In the complaint, Mr Giuliani is accused of holding on to his false allegations of widespread electoral fraud only on January 16, thereby sacrificing his reputation.

“Other lawyers have met ethical obligations by withdrawing from representing Mr Trump and his campaign,” the complaint said. “Mr. Giuliani not only gave the company his stature and attorney status, but he also shows no inclination to stop lying.”

Earlier this week, a person close to Mr Trump said Mr Giuliani would not be part of Mr Trump’s defense during his second Senate impeachment trial.

Categories
Politics

Trump’s ‘Legislation and Order’: One Extra Misleading Tactic Is Uncovered

“The attack on the Capitol was the result of years of erosion of the line between fact and fiction and right and wrong,” said Rory Cooper, a Republican strategist. Mr. Cooper argued that there is now an opening for a “conservative candidate” to finally decouple appeals to law and order from the selective enforcement of the Trump era, “but we are a long way from that time.”

Other Republicans insist that no reason has been lost on this issue – that the party is likely to have the upper hand in the eyes of voters. “I think Republicans have the benefit of law and order right now and still do, regardless of what happened at the Capitol,” said Chris Russell, a longtime Republican advisor and advertiser.

And should the Democrats “hold on to a message that defeats the police,” added Russell – although Mr Biden denounced it – Republican candidates are likely to continue to succeed in calling their party more committed to public safety and making it stronger to support law enforcement.

All of this is in line with how some Republican lawmakers streamlined the attack on the Capitol. They insist that the sea of ​​protesters and rioters was not the result of months of indulgence for the president’s lie that the election was stolen, did not reflect the core of the party, in fact did not reflect the party at all. Republican officials across the country have falsely claimed the deaths and damage were caused by Antifa.

Hogan Gidley, a spokesman for the president, argued that Mr Trump’s message of love did not include those who stormed the Capitol. “The President didn’t talk about these people. It was clearly the people who were there to peacefully gather and protest peacefully, ”said Mr Gidley, although Mr Trump had not specified that fact. “Because we believe in protecting not only the concept of law and order, but also the courageous men and women who introduce law and order.”

However, if law and order imply a commitment to equal security and justice, not even Mr Trump’s own staff seem certain that his supporters will adhere to it in the final days of his presidency.

And so the Law and Order Presidency ends as follows: Hundreds of National Guards who are posted behind a ten foot fence with barbed wire and protect the Capitol not from the people Mr. Trump demonized during his presidency, but from those who which he didn’t do.

Categories
Business

Parler accuses Amazon of breaking antitrust regulation in suspending internet hosting providers.

Hours after going offline on Monday, social media start-up Parler filed a lawsuit in federal court accusing Amazon of antitrust violations and calling for an injunction to prevent that the tech giant is blocking access to cloud computing services.

Amazon told Parler over the weekend that the service would be discontinued because “a steady increase in violent content” on the site indicated the company did not have a reliable process to prevent it from violating Amazon’s Terms of Service. Amazon said it would make sure Parler’s data is preserved so it can be migrated to a new hosting provider.

Millions of people turned to Parler after Twitter and Facebook banned President Trump following the Capitol uprising last week. Apple and Google kicked Parler out of their app stores later this week, although users who had already downloaded the app could still use it. However, the app relied on Amazon’s cloud computing technology.

Parler’s complaint was dated Sunday before Amazon suspended Parler. However, the lawsuit wasn’t filed with the court until Monday.

In the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western Washington District, Parler accused Amazon of terminating, rather than just banning, its account – and said it should have been given 30 days notice. It has also been argued that Amazon violated antitrust laws by teaming up with Twitter, a large Amazon customer, to start Parler just as it was gaining broader appeal. It said it had 12 million users and “expects millions more this week given the growth in recent days.”

Parler did not provide direct evidence that Amazon and Twitter coordinated the response. Instead, it cited a December press release announcing a multi-year strategic partnership between Amazon and Twitter, and cited Twitter’s own challenges in monitoring the content.

Parler said losing Amazon’s services would be a “death knell,” although other platforms popular with far-right and conspiracy theorists, such as Gab and 8chan, have managed to bounce back after being canceled by hosting providers.

David J. Groesbeck, a sole intellectual property attorney based in Olympia, Washington, filed the lawsuit on behalf of Parler. Amazon didn’t respond to an instant request for comment.

Categories
World News

What Argentina’s New Legislation Legalizing Abortion Means for Latin America

Latin America has long been hostile terrain to abortion rights advocates, even in the last few decades as legal abortion became available in most parts of Europe, North America, and other parts of the world.

But a grassroots feminist movement won a victory in Argentina on Wednesday when the Senate legalized abortion in a surprisingly sweeping vote. This made Argentina the first large country in Latin America to take this step.

Here are some of the forces behind the drive for change in Argentina and some of the questions that arise from it.

The women’s rights movement has taken on a new urgency across Latin America in recent years, nowhere more than in Argentina.

A movement that emerged in 2015 over the murders of women – including the gruesome murders of a 14-year-old and a 16-year-old – grew over the years into a broad national campaign for rights called Ni Una Menos or not one woman less. Legalizing abortion became its primary political goal, largely driven by young activists who have become well organized, vocal, and staged repeated demonstrations.

The #MeToo movement, which broke out in the US in 2017 and spread around the world, has stepped up these efforts.

In some countries, such as Mexico, the focus was on violence against women. But efforts from state to state in Mexico to make legal abortion more accessible there have also gained ground. The state of Oaxaca was the second after Mexico City to legalize the procedure last year.

Increasing secularism in Argentina and many other countries, especially among young people, has also lowered the barriers to liberal ends.

A major factor in Argentina was the election of President Alberto Fernández last year, one of the most socially liberal leaders in Latin America. He campaigned for abortion rights, gender equality, and gay and transgender rights, and last month legalized the cultivation of marijuana for medicinal purposes at home.

About two dozen countries around the world have laws that not only prohibit abortion but make no exceptions, according to groups that closely monitor access to abortion.

These countries, especially in America and Africa, include Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, the Dominican Republic, Haiti, Jamaica and Suriname. The ban was zealously enforced, with women whose pregnancy does not end with the birth of a healthy baby sometimes coming under suspicion and those sentenced to decades in prison for abortion.

From Mexico to Chile, a predominantly Roman Catholic region, most countries prohibit abortion early in pregnancy, but make exceptions if pregnancy puts a woman’s life at risk.

Some countries also allow abortions up to a certain point in pregnancy if the pregnancies are due to rape or incest, or if there are serious fetal abnormalities. Chile joined these countries in 2017 when it reversed one of the world’s toughest abortion bans.

Paraguay caught international attention when a pregnant 10-year-old girl who allegedly had been raped by her stepfather was unable to perform an abortion because her life was not in danger. The case led to calls for the Conservative government to liberalize the law, but it was not changed.

In all of Latin America, only three countries have legalized early pregnancy abortion for any reason, and all three countries are small and outliers in other important ways as well.

Ruled by the Communist Party for more than 60 years, Cuba legalized abortion in the 1960s. Guyana, a former British colony with a large non-Christian South Asian population, took this step in the 1990s. And Uruguay, where around 40 percent of people say they have no religious affiliation, did so in 2012.

Historically, more than 90 percent of the people in Latin America have been Catholic, and the Church, which strongly opposed abortion, exerted a powerful influence not only on religious beliefs but also on governments and ethical and social norms.

But the Church’s influence has steadily waned since the 1970s, and by 2014 less than 70 percent of Latin Americans called themselves Catholic, according to the Pew Research Center.

The sexual abuse scandals that rocked the Church have hit Latin America as hard as they have in many other parts of the world, driving some people from the Church and weakening their moral authority. A growing number of people who still identify as Catholic, especially young people, are not paying attention and are comfortable when they violate the teachings of the Church.

But evangelical Protestants, who are often more conservative than many Catholics on social issues, are on the rise and now make up about a fifth of Latin Americans. This explains why Central America, where the evangelical churches are strongest, has some of the strictest abortion laws.

At the same time, the number of people who have no religious affiliation and are more liberal on social issues has risen, although their ranks are still much smaller than those of the Protestant population.

Despite being the home of Pope Francis, America’s first Pope, Argentina is one of the most secular countries in Latin America. It’s unusual for polls to show that people without religion are more evangelicals.

The debate in Argentina has received tremendous attention in Latin America and is sure to stimulate discussion on abortion in other countries.

Recent efforts to facilitate access to abortion – successful in the case of Argentina, Chile and the Mexican state of Oaxaca and unsuccessful in the case of El Salvador, Brazil and Colombia – show that a region is emerging with changing social, cultural and political changes grapples.

The urge to change is often due to grassroots movements. Left-wing presidents who had taken power in Latin America over the past two decades showed little or no interest in changing abortion laws. These include Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Dilma Rousseff from Brazil, Andrés Manuel López Obrador from Mexico, Daniel Ortega from Nicaragua, and Hugo Chávez and Nicolás Maduro from Venezuela.

The left Bolivian government decriminalized early abortion for “students, adolescents or girls” in 2017 – and repealed the change weeks later.

Argentine President Fernández represents a new generation and a change from his predecessors, as a leftist who has made access to abortion one of his top priorities.