Categories
World News

Augmented actuality agency Nreal targets IPO inside 5 years, CEO says

SHANGHAI — Nreal, a Chinese company making glasses for so-called augmented reality experiences, is looking to go public within five years, its CEO told CNBC.

“We’re thinking this is really a major tech market and really looking forward to what’s going to happen in the next 10 to 15 years. Very exciting – I think its more like ’06, ’07 of the smartphone business,” Chi Xu, CEO of Nreal said.

“We see a lot of good opportunities and, definitely, we’re thinking the market size is going to be massive. And we have this opportunity and we want to take this to the final end.”

He said an initial public offering could come in “less than 5 years.”

The company’s flagship product is a pair of lightweight glasses called Nreal Light, which has been released in a handful of markets including South Korea and Japan. Nreal says its glasses allow users to experience “mixed reality” where digital images are superimposed over the real world.

The Nreal Light connects to a smartphone. One of the immediate uses frees people from being tied to their small smartphone screens.

“Whatever you’re displaying in the cellphone screen in front of you, you put that in front of your face, into a massive screen, and that can be 3D, that can be ultra-high definition,” Xu said.

An attendee tries a pair of Nreal mixed-reality glasses at the MWC Shanghai exhibition in Shanghai, China, on Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2021.

Qilai Shen | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Nreal’s ambitions pit it against technology giants that see a bright future in augmented reality. Apple CEO Tim Cook has called AR the “next big thing” and the iPhone giant is reportedly working on a headset. Facebook, Microsoft, Google and other technology companies are all investing in AR.

But current headsets on the market are expensive and often bulky. Nreal is hoping its portable nature will appeal to consumers. The price varies by market depending on how it is distributed. For example, in Japan the headset costs around $700. But in South Korea, the device can be purchased through a telecom operator’s plan which subsidizes the headset to around $300.

Business model

Nreal has a platform for developers to create apps for the headset’s operating system called Nebula.

“It’s very similar to what Apple has been doing for smartphone,” Xu said. “We offer a platform where people use that for different kinds of experiences and developers — they can deploy, they can develop different content onto the field.”

Apple not only makes money from sales of its iPhones and other hardware but it also gets revenue from commissions off its App Store.

Nreal has some notable backers. Kuaishou, the short-video platform in China and iQiyi, a video streaming service, are among the company’s investors. Xu said Nreal would be working with both Kuaishou and iQiyi.

“As we mentioned, not only are we going to provide the hardware. We want to bundle different services with the glasses. So take video for example, whether it’s a long video or short video. We’re thinking glasses are a much better terminal to experience the video in,” the CEO said.

“So that’s why we’ll be working with those giants, really working on the new interface.”

Categories
Health

Mark Wahlberg-backed F45 pops on IPO day. The actor touts exercises’ vitality

Global fitness company F45 Training, backed by actor Mark Wahlberg, made its stock market debut Thursday.

Under the ticker symbol FXLV, it started trading on the New York Stock Exchange and went as high as $17.75 per share on its first day for a $1.6 billion market cap. The initial public offering of 20.3 million shares was priced Wednesday evening in the middle of the expected range at $16 per share. The company raised $325 million. The stock drifted back toward its offering price in afternoon trading, closing up 1.25% at $16.20 per share.

Before the stock opened, Wahlberg, known for his physique and his intense early morning workouts, told CNBC from the floor of the NYSE why he likes the company’s approach so much.

“Die-hard fitness enthusiasts who don’t have the schedule, got to do it in the middle of the night or first thing in the morning, don’t want to get on a bike. That’s fine. But eventually that becomes, stagnant and boring,” Wahlberg said. “You want to be in there with the energy of people working out with you, alongside you, inspiring you, pushing you and supporting you.” He added, “The energy is absolutely incredible.”

Founded in 2013 in Australia, F45 Training offers what it calls functional 45-minute studio and home workouts for people across all fitness levels. It has new workouts each day, inspired by a database of over 3,900 high-intensity interval training exercises consisting of both cardio and resistance.

The company currently has 1,555 studios and 2,801 franchises across 63 countries, and aims to ultimately have more than 23,000 studios worldwide.

“People at any level of fitness can come in and do the workout, and I had never seen that before,” Wahlberg said on “Squawk Box.” “Somebody who’s clearly in the beginning of their fitness journey working out with somebody who is an elite athlete, and being able to do the same exercises, where they’re modified, never the same exercise twice. It’s absolutely fantastic.”

Mark Wahlberg, left, and Adam Gilchrist, CEO, F45 Training Holdings at the New York Stock Exchange, July 15, 2021.

Source: NYSE

In addition to Wahlberg, F45 Training said in its IPO filing that it has promotional relationships with basketball legend Magic Johnson, soccer great David Beckham, standout golfer Greg Norman and super model Cindy Crawford.

The company plans to use $190.7 million of the IPO’s net proceeds to repay debt, $2.5 million to give select cash bonuses for select employees, and $25 million to acquire the Flywheel indoor cycling chain.

“We’re going to be opportunistic with that capital,” F45 founder and CEO Adam Gilchrist told CNBC, standing next to Wahlberg. “We’ve been fiscally conservative since 2013, having never had an unprofitable quarter, and there’s not many start-ups that have been growing at this sort of breakneck speed that can boast that.”

Gilchrist called the company’s acquisition of Flywheel a “great investment” because he said the cycling chain had invested $65 million in technology, saving F45 Training about $40 million on costs and the three years, he believes, it would have taken F45 to build that technology.

F45 Training prides itself on providing a judgement-free zone, Gilchrist said, adding the company’s studios are considered “sanctuaries” for members, with no mirrors and no scales. The program applauds people for coming in three times a week.

An average F45 Training studio has 175 members while the company’s break-even point — when total revenue equal total expenses — is 75 members, he said. The CEO added that 75% of the company’s members are female and 25% are male, with the general age demographic ranging from 25 to 42 years old.

The small membership size develops a tight-knit community within the studios, he said, where members show up at 6 a.m., and know each other by name.

“We are a premium product where they pay anywhere up to $3,000 a year,” Gilchrist said, adding that the company’s monthly retention rate is in the “low single digits.”

Wahlberg said the company has seen people in the second months of their membership visiting the studio more frequently than they did before the Covid pandemic.

“We’re trying to create communities and community for us is actually even more important than the actual workout,” Gilchrist said. “We want people to have a third place to go. Obviously, they have home, work, and F45 is that spot where … it’s a sanctuary for people to turn up, and just have a fun 45 minutes of the day.”

F45 Training agreed in June 2020 to merge with Crescent Acquisition Corp., a special purpose acquisition company, but later canceled the deal as the pandemic shut several of its studios.

— Reuters contributed to this report.

Categories
Health

Doximity recordsdata for IPO and says docs will get allocation

Uber offered it to the drivers. Airbnb did it for hosts. Now Doximity is making it available to doctors, but in a much bigger way.

In its IPO prospectus on Friday, health tech company Doximity – often referred to as LinkedIn for Doctors – announced that it will allocate up to 15% of the shares in the Doctors offering through a “reserved share program”.

This means eligible doctors can get shares at the same price as the select group of institutional investors who so often benefit from the IPO pop because they get an early allocation and don’t have to wait for trading to start. Doximity hasn’t yet said how many shares it plans to issue or at what price. In order to qualify for the program, members must meet certain activity thresholds.

“We strive to be the world’s largest physician-owned technology company, and our reserved stock IPO program is designed to both thank our members and help the process,” wrote co-founders Jeff Tangney, Nate Gross and Shari Buck in the Founder’s Letter section of the prospectus.

Airbnb, which went public in December, has reserved up to 7% of the shares in its IPO for hosts on the platform. After the stock fell 112% on its debut, hosts who bought the maximum number of shares posted a paper profit of over $ 15,000 on day one.

There is no guarantee that the stock will rally like this. When Uber went public in 2019, the hailship company made up to 3% of its offering available to drivers. IPO buyers are only up 14% while the Nasdaq Composite is up 74% over that stretch. Meanwhile, trading app Robinhood announced last week that it was launching a product called IPO Access to give retail investors more opportunities to get into deals at asking price.

Founded in 2011, Doximity is largely under the radar, despite being based in San Francisco. The company has not borrowed since 2014, only raised around $ 80 million in venture finance in its decade as a private company, and spent very little on marketing. The company is also profitable: net income rose 69% to $ 50.2 million last fiscal year.

Doximity has grown rapidly as doctors have become the standard location across the country to connect with each other and stay up to date on new research. It was also a very valuable tool for medical recruiters. The service is now used by 1.8 million medical professionals in all top 20 hospitals and health systems, according to the prospectus.

Revenue rose 78% last year to $ 206.9 million. Sales and marketing accounted for 30% of total sales. Most of that is “staff expenses, sales commissions, travel expenses, and other event expenses,” with a little bit spent on Google and Facebook ads. Only $ 2.6 million went into advertising last year.

While Doximity doesn’t do a lot for advertising, it generates a healthy amount of revenue from medical and pharmaceutical companies that use the app to reach out to doctors. All top 20 drug manufacturers use the service to educate medical professionals about their products. The company said its subscription paid marketing solutions product represented over 80% of sales in the past fiscal year.

Most of the remaining revenue comes from hiring solutions used by healthcare systems and medical recruitment firms to connect with Doximity’s doctors.

Doximity said it has more than 600 subscription customers, including 200 who spent $ 100,000 in fiscal 2021. Of those, 29 spent at least $ 1 million. Subscriptions made up 93% of total sales.

Doximity also launched a telemedicine product last year when Covid-19 forced patients to stay at home and communicate with their doctors remotely. The company only started charging for the telehealth service in early January.

“We have seen rapid adoption of our telehealth solutions by our healthcare customers as Doximity members who have used our productivity tools in the past have used organically,” the company said.

Doximity said it is competing with LinkedIn for members. It competes against recruiting companies in hiring and recruiting, while in the telemedicine market it faces competition from Teladoc and American Well and the universal video chat app Zoom.

CLOCK: Robinhood to allow users to get involved in IPOs

Categories
Business

Retail conglomerate Genuine Manufacturers Group readies for summer season IPO

People enter a Forever 21 store at a shopping mall in Montebello, California on September 30, 2019 a day after the fashion retailer filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images

The retail conglomerate Authentic Brands Group is preparing for an initial public offering that could come as soon as this summer, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Authentic Brands — which owns businesses including Juicy Couture, Brooks Brothers, Aeropostale and Forever 21 — is targeting a valuation of about $10 billion in its IPO, said the person, who requested anonymity because the discussions remain private. At $10 billion, that would mean Authentic Brands’ market value would surpass that of Under Armour, Kohl’s, Ralph Lauren and Dick’s Sporting Goods. However, the size of the deal could change since it isn’t finalized.

Authentic Brands was valued at more than $4 billion, inclusive of debt, when BlackRock invested in the business back in 2019.

The official registration statement for the public offering is expected to be filed by Authentic Brands in early July, the person said, and shares could begin trading by the end of that month.

A spokesperson from Authentic Brands declined to comment.

Since the company’s inception, Authentic Brands’ founder and CEO Jamie Salter has accumulated more than two dozen retail brands, including the bankrupt department store chain Barneys New York, Nautica and Nine West.

The business currently does more than $10 billion in retail sales annually, according to its website.

Authentic Brands’ strategy in recent years has entailed working with two of the biggest publicly traded mall owners in the United States, Simon Property Group and Brookfield Property Partners. The trio came together in 2016 to purchase the teen apparel retailer Aeropostale out of bankruptcy. They did it again with Forever 21 last year.

With Simon, Authentic Brands has separately created a joint-venture known as SPARC Group, which currently runs the operations of Brooks Brothers, Nautica, Aeropostale, Forever 21 and Lucky Brand.

Authentic Brands and SPARC recently announced they will be acquiring Eddie Bauer from the private-equity firm Golden Gate Capital.

In addition to BlackRock, Authentic Brands is backed by investors including General Atlantic and Leonard Green & Partners. BlackRock and General Atlantic declined to comment, while Leonard Green & Partners didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

“I’m in the first inning,” Salter told CNBC in an interview last year. “People are asking me, ‘Jamie. Mall-based retail? I don’t get it.’ … What I am going to say to you is, we need bricks and mortar. Retail really needs it.”

Bloomberg first reported on Authentic Brands’ plans to go public.

Categories
Business

Oatly, a Maker of Oat Milk, Is About to Have Its IPO

Private equity has a seat at the table, as does Oprah and Jay-Z. Food giants like Nestlé are trying to get a foot in the door. There are effects on the climate. There is even geopolitical rumble.

The unlikely focus of this fuss is Oatly, a maker of an oat milk substitute that can be poured onto muesli or foamed for a cappuccino. Oatly, a Swedish company, will sell shares to the public for the first time this week. The offering could be worth $ 10 billion and exemplify the changes in consumer preferences that are transforming the grocery store.

It is no longer enough that food tastes good and is healthy. More and more people want to make sure that ketchup, cookies, or mac and cheese don’t help melt the polar ice caps. Food production is a major contributor to climate change, especially when animals are involved. (Cows belch methane, a powerful greenhouse gas.) Milk substitutes made from soybeans, cashews, almonds, hazelnuts, hemp, rice, and oats have increased due to increasing demand.

“We have a bold vision for a food system that is better for people and the planet,” Oatly stated in his prospectus for the offering. The company’s shares are expected to trade in New York on May 20.

To justify its foamy valuation, Oatly needs to convince investors that it can dominate a market that is already highly competitive and where large food conglomerates are just beginning to deploy their vast resources. Nestlé, the world’s largest producer of packaged foods, launched its own milk alternative made from peas this month.

Oatly maintains an up-and-coming image with packaging art and a logo – Oatly! – that looks hand-drawn. It advertises that it is “like milk, but made for people”. But the company is more than 25 years old and has serious money backing it.

The majority shareholder is a partnership between a Chinese government company and Verlinvest, a Belgian company that invests part of the assets of the families who control the beer empire Anheuser-Busch InBev. Blackstone, the giant private equity firm, owns a little less than 8 percent of Oatly.

The interest from heavyweight investors is confirmation that vegan food has become mainstream, but it could also make it difficult for Oatly to maintain its anti-establishment image. The company faced a backlash from some fans after Blackstone made a $ 200 million investment in Oatly last year. Stephen A. Schwarzman, the executive director of Blackstone, has been a staunch supporter of former President Donald J. Trump who has claimed climate change is a hoax.

Oatly hoped Blackstone’s investment would inspire other private equity firms to “channel their total $ 4 trillion worth into green investments.” Blackstone’s support also helped make Oatly credible on Wall Street. And there was no sign that Blackstone’s involvement slowed Oatly’s sales, which doubled in the last year.

Oatly’s image benefited from a number of prominent investors, including Oprah Winfrey, Natalie Portman, Jay-Z’s Roc Nation company, and Howard Schultz, the former chief executive of Starbucks. All of them have a certain connection to the vegetable or healthy movement of life.

Oatly declined to comment, citing regulations restricting public speaking prior to going public.

Oat milk is part of a larger trend towards foods that mimic animal products. So-called food tech companies like Beyond Meat have raised just over $ 18 billion in risk financing, according to PitchBook, which tracks the industry. Plant-based dairy products, which include brands like Ripple (made from peas) and Moalla (bananas) in the U.S., raised $ 640 million last year, more than double the amount a year earlier.

In the US, milk substitutes like oat milk and rice milk make up a $ 2.5 billion industry that is expected to grow to $ 3.6 billion by 2025, according to Euromonitor. Globally, the $ 9.5 billion industry is expected to grow to $ 11 billion.

Once a niche market, alternative milk has become as American as baseball. A frozen version of oatly that mimics soft ice cream is on sale this season at Yankee Stadium, Wrigley Field in Chicago, and Globe Life Field in Arlington, Texas, where the Rangers play.

Although Oatly’s revenue rose from $ 204 million in 2019 to $ 420 million in 2019, the company posted a loss of $ 60 million as it invested in new factories, marketing, and new products. Oatly also sells its milk drink in chocolate and other flavors, as well as a non-dairy substitute for yogurt, ice cream, cream cheese and even crème fraîche.

Oatly was founded in 1994 by Rickard Oste, Professor of Food Chemistry and Nutrition in Sweden, and his brother Björn Oste. In Malmö, Sweden, they developed a method of processing an oat and water slurry with enzymes to achieve natural sweetness, as well as a milk-like taste and consistency.

In business today

Updated

May 17, 2021, 12:48 p.m. ET

The company’s growth accelerated after Verlinvest acquired a majority stake in 2016 through a joint venture with China Resources, a state-owned conglomerate with large stakes in cement, power generation, coal mining, beer, retail and many other industries. The new funding helped Oatly expand in Europe and export to the US and China, where many people cannot tolerate cow’s milk. China Resources’s commitment has undoubtedly helped open doors in the Chinese market. Asia, especially China, accounted for 18 percent of sales in the first quarter of 2021 and is growing 450 percent annually, according to Oatly.

In Europe, concerns are growing about Chinese investments in strategic industries such as automobiles, batteries and robotics. The European Commission has started putting regulatory barriers in place for companies with financial ties to the Chinese government. So far, however, no one has voiced concerns that China will dominate the global oat milk supply.

Just in case, Oatly’s prospectus offers a Hong Kong listing when foreign ownership becomes an issue in the US.

The potential of the market for milk alternatives is not lost by large food manufacturers. Oatly acknowledged in its offer documents that it faces stiff competition, including from “multinational companies with far greater resources and activities than we do”.

This includes the British consumer goods manufacturer Unilever, which announced last year that it would generate sales of one billion euros or 1.2 billion US dollars by 2027 with plant-based substitutes for meat and dairy products such as Hellmann’s vegan mayonnaise or Ben & Jerry’s dairy products free ice. Unilever has not announced any plans for a milk substitute.

Some industry analysts argue that Oatly’s size gives him an edge over these giants and allows him to be more innovative than a corporate giant. Food start-ups are “younger and faster,” said Patrick Müller-Sarmiento, head of the consumer goods and retail practice at Roland Berger, a German consulting firm.

The established food giants also have a harder time than newcomers convincing consumers that they sincerely want to save the planet, an important part of the oat milk sales pitch.

Mr. Müller-Sarmiento, the former managing director of Real, a German chain of big box stores, said that meat and milk alternatives have no problem competing with big food for valuable retail space. “Retailers are urgently looking for new products,” he said.

At the time, Nestlé or Unilever would have simply acquired Oatly, just as they devoured hundreds of other brands. However, they would struggle to justify the bold $ 10 billion price tag that Oatly has set as the benchmark for its stock offering.

Nestlé’s response was to develop its own milk substitute, Wunda, which the company launched this month and which will initially sell in France, Portugal and the Netherlands. Wunda is made from a variety of yellow peas and contains more protein than oat milk. Some nutritionists have said that oat milk and other milk alternatives are poor substitutes for cow’s milk because they don’t contain nearly as much protein.

Stefan Palzer, Nestlé’s chief technology officer, has had trouble with those who say a big company can’t move as fast as a bunch of Swedish foodies. A young team from Nestlé developed Wunda in nine months, including three-month market tests in the UK, Palzer said in an interview.

Nestlé was able to adapt existing production facilities to Wunda instead of building new factories as Oatly has to do. The company already had plant scientists who could identify the best pea and food safety experts to steer the regulatory approval process, Palzer said.

The Wunda developers “could have any expert they wanted for the project,” said Palzer. “That allowed them to move at that speed.”

Nestlé already has dairy-free versions of Nesquik drinks and Häagen Dazs ice cream, and sells creamer made from a blend of oat and almond milk under the Starbucks brand. The company goes to great lengths to develop substitutes for almost all types of animal products. The next frontier: fish. Nestlé has started selling a tuna substitute called Vuna and is working on scallops.

“It’s a great opportunity to combine health with sustainability,” said Palzer of plant-based alternatives to milk and meat. “It’s also a great growth opportunity.”

Categories
Business

Journey.com up greater than 4% in Hong Kong IPO, bullish on China journey in Might

Online travel agency Trip.com made a strong debut in Hong Kong on Monday. The shares rose by around 4.55% compared to the issue price.

The China-based company is now joining other US-listed Chinese tech heavyweights like Alibaba, JD.com and Baidu, who have moved closer to their homeland via second deals in Hong Kong. The IPO was valued at $ 268 Hong Kong per share and $ 8,478 million (US $ 1.09 billion) was raised unless the over-allotment option is exercised.

The secondary listing comes as Chinese tech companies continue to face the risk of being delisted in the US, which clouded investor sentiment.

This May vacation we already have … some of the inbound people and we’re seeing a record number of travelers in China – likely double digit growth from pre-Covid levels.

James Liang

Chairman of the Board of the Trip.com Group

James Liang, CEO of Trip.com Group, told CNBC that the “main reason” for listing the company as a secondary listing in Hong Kong was to make it easier for global investors in Asia and China to trade stocks.

“Most of our customers are in Asia. I think it’s pretty natural for us to be listed in Hong Kong,” he said in an interview with CNBC’s Street Signs Asia on Monday.

“Very optimistic” about the May vacation

Even if much of the global travel market continues to stall due to the coronavirus pandemic, Trip.com expects a “record number of travelers in China” for the long vacation ahead in May.

“This May vacation, we already have … some of the numbers that are coming in, and we’re seeing a record number of travelers in China – likely double-digit growth from pre-Covid levels,” Liang said. Labor Day holidays are May 1-5 in China.

In particular, upscale accommodations like resorts and short-haul travel are expected to see “very, very rapid growth” that could actually more than offset the decline in international travel, Liang predicted.

An employee walks through the reception area at the headquarters of Trip.com Group Ltd. on Thursday, February 4, 2021. in Shanghai, China.

Qilai Shen | Bloomberg via Getty Images

“The money people save by buying international airline tickets is what people are spending on hotels, especially high-end hotels and cars, you know, on local transport,” he said. “While the total transaction amount may not hit record levels, we are very optimistic about the number of travelers and margins.”

China was the first country to report on the coronavirus pandemic. After tight lockdown measures launched across the country weeks after the earliest Covid-19 cases occurred in Wuhan city in late 2019, the country largely managed to contain the spread of the virus and stepped as one of the few major economies in 2020 that expanded this year.

In contrast, authorities in other countries continue to struggle to vaccinate their populations in the face of increasing viral infections and potential mutations.

One example is India, which has seen a second wave of coronavirus infections since February and overtook Brazil last week to become the second worst affected country after the US, just behind the US

Categories
World News

Didi Chuxing elevating $1.5 billion in debt forward of IPO: Studies

A logo of the hail giant Didi Chuxing on a building in Hangzhou in the eastern Chinese province of Zhejiang.

STR | AFP | Getty Images

Chinese giant Didi Chuxing reportedly took on $ 1.5 billion in debt ahead of a blockbuster IPO in the United States, Bloomberg reported on Friday, citing sources familiar with the matter.

According to a Reuters report, the Softbank-backed company also plans on Friday to secretly file a July listing later this month under the auspices of Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley.

According to PitchBook data, Didi was valued at $ 62 billion after a fundraising round in August. Both Bloomberg and Reuters report that the company could consider a valuation of $ 100 billion at the time of its Wall Street debut.

A US-based spokesman for the company reached by CNBC declined to comment.

A Didi IPO could be one of the biggest tech IPOs this year and one of the biggest Chinese IPOs in the US since Alibaba was listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 2014. The Ant Group IPO, which would have been the largest in history, was pulled by regulators just days before trading began in Shanghai and Hong Kong in November. The IPO was suspended shortly after Jack Ma, the founder of Alibaba, which owns around a third of the Ant Group, made some comments that were critical of China’s financial regulator. The Ant Group was also an early investor in Didi.

Last May, Didi President Jean Liu told CNBC that the company’s core business was profitable and that it had picked up again after the coronavirus outbreak in China, its home market. Liu did not provide any specific numbers or what measure of profitability she was referring to.

Didi has been on the CNBC Disruptor 50 list for the past three consecutive years, most recently at number 30 on last year’s list. Headquartered in Beijing, the company operates in China and eight overseas markets, including Australia and Japan.

Categories
Business

Coupang, South Korea’s Reply to Amazon, Debuts in I.P.O.

SEOUL, South Korea – The little white vans drive through the streets of South Korea. The uniformed workers send photos of safely delivered packages to impatient customers. Workers can move as fast as the employer promises that the service is called “missile delivery”.

The trucks and operations are owned by Coupang, a start-up founded by a Harvard Business School dropout that rocked shopping in South Korea, an industry long dominated by giant button-down conglomerates. In a country where people are obsessed with “ppalli ppalli” or get things done quickly, Coupang has become a household name by offering next day and even same day and dawn grocery delivery and millions of other items without Surcharge.

The company, sometimes referred to as the Amazon of South Korea, received huge support from Wall Street on Thursday. The company’s shares rose 41 percent from a market price of $ 35 to $ 49.25. The IPO raised $ 4.6 billion and valued the company at around $ 85 billion. This is the second largest American balance sheet for an Asian company after the Alibaba Group of China in 2014.

Coupang may need the money. South Korea’s large conglomerates called Chaebol and others are building their own delivery networks as Coupang plans to expand. There are other issues as well, such as growing concerns about working conditions following the deaths of several warehouse and delivery workers in Coupang, who blamed some relatives and labor activists for overwork and poor work practices.

Coupang is currently South Korea’s largest e-commerce retailer. Its status is further cemented by people stuck at home during the pandemic and people in the country craving for faster delivery.

“I’m not going to go so far as to say that I can’t live without Coupang because there are so many other online shopping opportunities here that are fiercely competitive, and some of them can be as fast as Coupang or cheaper.” said Kim Su-kyeong, a coupang buyer and mother in Seoul. “But Coupang has branded itself so well that the name comes to mind when I think of shopping online.”

Bom Suk Kim, who founded Coupang in 2010, likes to say: “Our mission is to create a world in which customers ask themselves: How have I ever lived without Coupang?”

Kim, 42, ran an unofficial and short-lived Harvard alumni magazine in the United States before returning to his native land to revolutionize the e-commerce industry. Coupang’s rapid growth was driven by a combination of daring entrepreneurship and branding. This includes spending a lot on infrastructure to limit the inconvenience typically associated with online ordering and returns such as cardboard boxes. Rocket Wow Membership Program customers can return a Coupang product by leaving it outside the door with no box or return label.

“It’s not just free – it’s a stress-free experience,” said Mr Kim in an interview on Thursday. “We really tried to get to the extremes that have a really high bar, not to do something incrementally different, but to think about how we can just change the actual framework – the framework.”

The company’s name is a mixture of the English word “coupon” and “pang”, the Korean sound for the jackpot. In an industry where most delivery drivers drive around in nondescript trucks with drab jackets, Coupang’s fleet of full-time drivers – known as Coupang Men but recently renamed Coupang Friends – wear bright uniforms and drive around in branded vehicles exhibited by companies.

“Coupang has grown rapidly by meeting two key customer needs: affordable pricing and fast delivery,” said Ju Yoon-hwang, professor of sales management at Jangan University. “Coupang also offers more goods than its competitors, so consumers believe they can find everything on Coupang.”

Few startups – like Naver, South Korea’s dominant web portal and search engine, and Kakao, the leading messaging app and online bank – have been as successful as Coupang. But Naver and Cocoa are both listed in South Korea. Mr Kim brought Coupang to Wall Street to attract larger investors and a higher valuation that would allow his company to outperform its home rivals.

South Korea is one of the fastest growing e-commerce markets in the world and is expected to be the third largest in the world this year, after only China and the US. According to a market research firm Euromonitor International, the volume, which was valued at $ 128 billion last year, is projected to reach $ 206 billion by 2024.

And it’s great for e-commerce. Around 52 million people live in rural areas, the vast majority of them in densely populated cities. Almost every home has high-speed internet, and people pay taxes and gas bills with smartphones.

South Korea had a vibrant delivery culture long before the arrival of e-commerce. Families called to have their food delivered around the clock. Dry cleaning workers climbed stairs in residential buildings to deliver freshly pressed clothing. Motorcycle couriers brought documents, flowers and so on from one district to another.

Coupang’s first competitors were eBay-style marketplaces where customers found sellers. The deliveries were made by logistics companies that had contracts with independent couriers. Deliveries can take several days.

When Coupang started its “rocket delivery service” in 2014, it sparked a price and delivery war. Since then, the company has built up its own network of logistics centers. According to the company, 70 percent of the population live within seven miles of a Coupang logistics center. The company uses machine learning to predict demand and store goods in warehouses. It also operates its own fleet of 15,000 full-time Coupang Friend couriers.

In 2020, the company doubled its workforce to 50,000, making it South Korea’s third largest employer in the private sector. 50,000 more jobs are to be created by 2025.

Analysts said Coupang borrowed from Amazon’s Playbook in trying to become a dominant market power before turning a profit. The company’s revenue nearly doubled to $ 12 billion last year. However, the huge investments in the logistics network made possible by funding from foreign investors such as the Japanese SoftBank and the Vision Fund have continued to be in the red. Annual net loss rose to $ 1 billion in 2018, before decreasing to $ 475 million last year.

“The picture is pretty clear about the strength of the business,” said Mr. Kim. Although the company has not given a timeline for when it could turn a profit, he said Coupang will “continue to be able to finance itself” and “be aggressive about reinvestments”.

Coupang Eats, a food delivery service, and Coupang Play, a video streaming app, were recently launched. However, unlike Amazon, Coupang doesn’t have other companies like cloud computing that can easily generate the money needed for big expansions. And rivals are tough.

Some of the chaebol, the family-run conglomerates that dominate the economy, are expanding their e-commerce businesses, particularly Lotte and Shinsegae, which run the largest department store and mall chains in the country. So does Naver, who is already an e-commerce giant.

As competition intensifies, super-fast delivery is quickly becoming the new norm, which weakens the novelty of the Coupang missile delivery service.

Coupang has also undergone a review of its labor practices. Former coupang workers and labor activists accuse the company of exploiting its warehouse workers in a frenzied rush to process orders as quickly as possible.

As the number of workers doubled, the number of people suffering from work-related injuries or illnesses in Coupang and its camps rose from 515 in 2019 to 982 in 2020, according to government figures.

“Coupang is an inhumane company that treats its workers like slaves or machine parts and squeezes them to the last drop,” said Park Mi-sook, whose son Jang Deok-joon died of a heart attack shortly after returning in October from a night shift in a coupang warehouse. His death was deemed a work-related incident and Coupang has since apologized.

Coupang has denied mistreating its workers. In the past year alone, the company invested $ 443 million in automating its warehouse and increased the number of warehouse workers by 78 percent to 28,400 to make employees more efficient and reduce workload.

“What made Coupang’s missile delivery possible was its massive employment and investment,” the company said in a statement.

And it’s still an indispensable service for busy South Koreans.

In a letter to prospective investors, Mr. Kim shared an example of a typical Coupang shopper: a working mom who realizes late at night that she forgot to go shopping and then places an order online through Coupang.

“When she opens her eyes, it’s like Christmas morning,” wrote Mr. Kim. “The order is waiting at your doorstep.”

Categories
World News

Robinhood chooses the Nasdaq for its IPO, sources say

Avishek Das | LightRocket | Getty Images

Robinhood has selected the Nasdaq as the source for its eventual IPO, according to sources familiar with the matter.

The company has not yet officially applied for listing.

The stock trading app has lowered the market entry barrier for millions of retail investors, paving the way for one of the biggest public debuts of the year.

It is unclear whether Robinhood chose a direct listing or a traditional IPO. Regardless of method, Robinhood will file an S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It usually takes a month or two for companies to debut once they file with the SEC.

Goldman Sachs advises on Robinhood’s IPO.

Robinhood – whose long-standing mission is to “democratize” investment – is seen as the main gateway for young investors to gain access to the markets.

After record growth during the Covid-19 pandemic, the millennial stock trading app found itself in the middle of a firestorm in January amid brief pressure on GameStop, fueled in part by Reddit-fueled retail investors. Robinhood’s brand appears to be intact, however, as pre-IPO stock bids speak of the GameStop mania.

According to JMP Securities estimates, Robinhood gained 3 million users in January alone.

New York-based D1 Partners, Sequoia, Kleiner Perkins, and Google’s venture capital arm GV are among Robinhood’s largest venture capital investors.

The Nasdaq and Robinhood declined to comment.

Categories
Business

Bumble IPO a win for feminine founders, enterprise capital funds nonetheless low

Whitney Wolfe Herd speaks on stage during the Fortune Most Powerful Women Next Gen conference at Monarch Beach Resort on November 13, 2017 in Dana Point, California.

Joe Scarnici | Getty Images Entertainment

When 31-year-old Bumble CEO Whitney Wolfe Herd goes public this week, she will be known not only for her youth, but also as one of the few founders to have her company go public.

It’s a fitting achievement for the founder of a dating app that aims to put women in the driver’s seat. But it also hammers home the still unsuitable playing field for entrepreneurs.

Bumble, whose board of directors is 73% women, is slated to begin trading on the Nasdaq a few days before Valentine’s Day on Thursday. The company will sell its shares at $ 43 per share and raise $ 2.2 billion from investors. The offering initially valued the company at more than $ 7 billion.

The market reaction will serve as the litmus test of investing in women-owned businesses.

Today, women make up 7.4% of Fortune 500 CEOs – an all-time high, but still an astonishingly low number. Even fewer women founders of public limited companies. Nasdaq estimates that only 20 of the US public companies active today were led by their founder through the IPO.

Women’s funding falls as global deals rise

The problem is not a lack of women entrepreneurs, but a lack of support where it matters: funding.

In a 2018 study, the Boston Consulting Group found “a significant gender gap in new business financing.” According to the study, investments in businesses founded or co-founded by women averaged $ 935,000, less than half the average $ 2.1 million men receive.

Even so, startups founded by women and co-founded made 78 cents for every dollar invested, while startups founded by men made only 31 cents.

Covid-19 could be the greatest threat to female founders.

Matt Krentz

Managing Director and Senior Partner of the Boston Consulting Group

The pandemic has only widened this gap.

In 2020, global risk finance increased 13% year over year, while investments in women decreased 27%. In the meantime, the proportion of women founders who were only assigned to female founders has fallen from 2.8% to 2.3%, according to Crunchbase data. This is due to the fact that women, often primary caregivers, are said to be more affected by the pandemic overall.

“The convergence of crises – demands for racial justice, #MeToo, Black Lives Matter, Covid-19 and an economic downturn – makes this a crucial moment for business integration, justice and diversity,” said Matt Krentz, Managing Director and Senior Partner at BCG and The study co-authored, said CNBC. “Of all these problems, Covid-19 could be the greatest threat to female founders.”

Redirect investments where they are needed

The economic benefits of investing in women are well documented. By some estimates, equal business participation by men and women could add $ 5 trillion to the global economy.

And companies and institutions seem to be listening now. Many have made bold commitments to better support gender equality and female founders.

What female founders need is simple and equal access to financial investments.

Tanya Rolfe

managing partner, Her Capital

“Awareness of the funding gap and the impact of different leadership teams is better understood, and investors have begun to ask directly about the diversity of founders and leadership teams,” said Krentz.

Too often, however, these investments are poorly channeled, according to Tanya Rolfe, managing partner at Her Capital, a women-run venture capital company that focuses on female founders in Southeast Asia.

“Women seem to be at the center of a lot of additional mentoring, which only suggests that women are missing something,” said Rolfe. “What female founders need is simple and equal access to financial investments.”

Tanya Rolfe, managing partner of Singapore-based venture capital firm Her Capital.

Your capital

To achieve this, more diversity is needed at the fund manager level, Rolfe said.

According to All Raise, a nonprofit focused on accelerating the success of female founders and funders, women made up just 13% of all venture capitalists in 2020. An estimated 11% of fund managers were women, All Raise said.

“If we want to see diversity at the founder level, we need to invest in diversity at the capital allocator level – fund managers like me,” continued Rolfe. “It is almost more important to invest in venture capital funds with specific strategies for investing in different founders. This is where we will see the major changes.”

Revision of traditional investment figures

Nevertheless, various funds continue to face an uphill battle.

Since many are still in their infancy and have little success, they are usually outside the investment criteria of the institutes. As a result, managers often seek less lucrative and more time-consuming deals from private investors.

Pippa Lamb, a partner in early-stage mutual fund Sweet Capital, says such an approach needs to be revised.

The pricing of perceived risk based on a person’s race or gender is very out of date to me.

Pippa Lamb

Partner, Sweet Capital

“The pricing of perceived risk based on a person’s race or gender is very out of date to me,” said Lamb. “I would guess top-tier institutional investors are ready to do the job for full diligence managers no matter what they look like.”

“We need more diverse representation in all areas of the start-up ecosystem,” she said, citing female founders, female board members, female venture capitalists and female institutional investors. “When it comes to raising capital, the latter two are most critical, especially at the limited partner (LP) level: the investor’s investors.”

BCG’s Krentz hopes the tide will turn.

“Investors should understand that current market forces offer promising opportunities for women-owned companies,” he said. “The lack of funding means that there is less competition for women-supported companies and, on average, these companies perform better than companies with all male founders.”

But until this understanding grows, Rolfe and Lamb’s advice to female founders is simple: keep going.

“Women can do the same thing that male founders do to attract investors,” said Rolfe. “If you’re a great founder with a solid business plan and traction to prove your execution and thesis, that should be enough.”