Categories
Politics

New York Meeting will droop Andrew Cuomo impeachment investigation

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo listens during his announcement at the Jacob K. Javits Convention Center in Manhattan in New York City, New York, U.S., May 11, 2021

Eduardo Munoz | Reuters

The New York state Assembly will suspend its impeachment investigation of Gov. Andrew Cuomo after his resignation takes effect Aug. 25, Speaker Carl Heastie said Friday.

Cuomo announced his resignation earlier this week after the New York state attorney general’s office  found that he sexually harassed at least 11 women and oversaw a hostile working environment in his office.

Heastie said there is no longer a need for the state Assembly Judiciary Committee’s impeachment investigation, which was authorized in March, due to the governor’s resignation. The Judiciary Committee also advised the Assembly that the state constitution does not authorize the legislature to impeach and remove an elected official who is no longer in office, Heastie said.

However, the committee’s work over the last several months did uncover evidence related to allegations against the governor, Heastie said, which “could likely have resulted in articles of impeachment had he not resigned.”

This includes evidence related to sexual harassment and misconduct, the misuse of state resources in relation to the governor’s memoir, and misleading disclosure of nursing home data during the coronavirus pandemic.

Heastie has asked the Judiciary Committee to turn over to “relevant investigatory authorities” all the evidence gathered during the inquiry.

The state attorney general’s office is investigating issues concerning Cuomo’s memoir, while the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York is probing his administration’s actions related to nursing home data.

Investigations into the governor’s sexual misconduct are being carried out by local law enforcement authorities in five jurisdictions: Manhattan, Albany, Westchester, Nassau and Oswego.

“The people of this great state expect and deserve a government they can count on to always have their best interests in mind. Our government should always operate in a transparent, safe and honest manner,” Heastie said in a statement Friday.

Lindsey Boylan, a former aide to the governor and one of the 11 women who came forward with sexual harassment allegations, was critical of the Assembly’s decision.

“The Assembly’s decision to call off its impeachment investigation is an unjust cop out. The public deserves to know the extent of the Governor’s misdeeds and possible crimes. His victims deserve justice and to know he will not be able harm others,” Boylan said in a Twitter post Friday.

In his resignation speech Tuesday, Cuomo said he decided to step down to avoid distracting the state as it grapples with the pandemic and other issues.

“Given the circumstances, the best way I can help now is if I step aside and let government get back to government,” Cuomo said Tuesday. “And therefore that is what I’ll do, because I work for you, and doing the right thing, is doing the right thing for you.”

The governor has denied sexually harassing people, but conceded that some of his comments made women uncomfortable, and he apologized for that.

Cuomo dodging impeachment and removal means he still has the option of running for office again, including jumping into a future gubernatorial election.

Cuomo’s reelection campaign account had just more than $18 million on hand after the first half of the year, overwhelmingly surpassing the funds of New York Lt. Gov. Kathy Hochul, who will finish the remainder of the governor’s term when he steps down. Hochul intends to run for governor after she finishes out Cuomo’s term.

Records show Cuomo’s campaign paid more than $280,000 to his attorney’s firm, Glavin PLLC, while he was under investigation by the New York state attorney general’s office.

— CNBC’s Dan Mangan and Brian Schwartz contributed to this report.

Correction: Lindsey Boylan is a former aide to the governor and one of the 11 women who came forward with sexual harassment allegations. An earlier version misspelled her name.

Categories
Politics

Why America Isn’t Getting the Jan. 6 Investigation It Wants

Some of this sentiment reflects how conservative media has covered — or, perhaps, not covered — the siege. The events of Jan. 6 have been mentioned about four times as often on CNN and MSNBC as on Fox News, according to an analysis of television news clips. And it certainly reflects how dominant partisanship has become in our politics.

But these beliefs also show how difficult it will be for Speaker Nancy Pelosi to persuade large parts of the country that her select committee is conducting a truthful and nonpartisan investigation into the Jan. 6 riot. Republicans in Congress can opt out of participating in a bipartisan investigation into one of the most shocking events in the history of American politics with little fear of backlash from their base. In fact, many of their voters don’t want to hear much about the Jan. 6 attack at all.

Others are clearly looking for their leaders to defend rioters’ actions that day. That’s partly why Ms. Pelosi rejected two of Representative Kevin McCarthy’s picks for the committee, prompting Mr. McCarthy, the minority leader, to pull all of his Republican nominations from the panel.

Those two selections, Representatives Jim Banks of Indiana and Jim Jordan of Ohio, had openly expressed hostility to the mission of the committee and trafficked in revisionist history about the siege, and they may be material witnesses to the events leading up to that day.

Would keeping Mr. Jordan and Mr. Banks on the committee have helped build credibility for the effort among Republican voters? That seems unlikely, given that both had already broadcast their intention to undermine the effort.

Ms. Pelosi can still argue that her panel is bipartisan. It will include Representative Liz Cheney, a Wyoming Republican, and reports suggest that she could add Representative Adam Kinzinger of Illinois, also a Republican. Both lawmakers are reviled by their party’s base for attacking Mr. Trump’s effort to overturn the election and are unlikely to be seen as credible messengers by many Republicans.

Mr. McCarthy, meanwhile, has vowed to conduct his own investigation.

So after months of negotiation, the end result is likely to be two panels, one led by Democrats and the other by Republicans. It’s a situation that encapsulates our divided political moment: Whatever the process, the testimony or the findings, the results of either committee are unlikely to be trusted by voters from the opposing party. And reaching any kind of national consensus about what happened on that awful day feels like as much of a fantasy as any false-flag conspiracy theory.

Categories
World News

Israeli spy ware used to focus on telephones of journalists and activists, investigation finds

An Israeli woman uses her iPhone in front of the building of the Israeli NSO group in Herzliya near Tel Aviv on August 28, 2016.

Jack Guez | AFP | Getty Images

According to a comprehensive investigation by the Washington Post and 16 other news organizations, private Israeli spy software was used to hack dozens of smartphones belonging to reporters, human rights activists, business people and the fiancé of murdered Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi.

The military-grade spyware was reportedly licensed by Israeli spyware company NSO Group. The investigation found that the hacked phones were on a list of more than 50,000 numbers in countries known to monitor people.

The list of numbers was made available to the Post and other media organizations by the Paris-based nonprofit journalism organization Hidden Stories and the human rights group Amnesty International.

The NSO Group denied the results of the report in several statements, arguing that the investigation contained “unconfirmed theories” based on “misleading interpretation of leaked data from accessible and overt basic information”.

The NSO Group also said it would continue to investigate all credible allegations of abuse and take appropriate action.

NSO Group’s Pegasus spyware is licensed to governments around the world and can, according to the report, hack a cellphone’s data and activate the microphone. NSO said the spyware is only used to monitor terrorists and other criminals.

Read the full report here.

Categories
Health

FDA requires federal investigation into approval

Biogen shares fell on Friday after the head of the Food and Drug Administration called for an investigation into the recent approval of the company’s Alzheimer’s drug, Aduhelm.

Acting FDA Commissioner Dr. Janet Woodcock asked the Office of the Inspector General to investigate interactions between the US agency and Biogen representatives prior to the drug’s approval on June 7.

“I believe that it is critical that the events at issue be reviewed by an independent body such as the Office of the Inspector General in order to determine whether any interactions that occurred between Biogen and FDA review staff were inconsistent with FDA policies and procedures,” Woodcock wrote in a letter sent Friday.

Shares of Biogen fell by more than 3% after the announcement.

Biogen’s stock surged last month after the FDA approved the biotech company’s drug, the first medication cleared by US regulators to slow cognitive decline in people living with Alzheimer’s and the first new medicine for the disease in nearly two decades.

That decision marked a departure from the advice of the agency’s independent panel of outside experts, who unexpectedly declined to endorse the drug last fall, citing unconvincing data. At least three members of the panel have resigned in protest following the agency’s approval.

Federal regulators faced intense pressure from friends and family members of Alzheimer’s patients asking to fast-track the drug, scientifically known as aducanumab. STAT News and other media outlets reported FDA officials used a regulatory shortcut to gain approval in order to get the drug on the market sooner.

Biogen’s drug targets a “sticky” compound in the brain known as beta-amyloid, which scientists expect plays a role in the devastating disease.

It’s rare for an FDA chief to call for an investigation into the agency’s own decisions. It’s the latest setback for the company and the drug, which has been controversial since it showed promise in 2016.

In March 2019, Biogen pulled development of the drug after an analysis from an independent group revealed it was unlikely to work. The company then shocked investors several months later by announcing it would seek regulatory approval for the medication after all.

When Biogen sought approval for the drug in late 2019, its scientists said a new analysis of a larger dataset showed aducanumab “reduced clinical decline in patients with early Alzheimer’s disease.”

Alzheimer’s experts and Wall Street analysts were immediately skeptical, with some wondering whether the clinical trial data was enough to prove the drug works and whether approval could make it harder for other companies to enroll patients in their own drug trials.

Some doctors have said they won’t prescribe aducanumab because of the mixed data package supporting the company’s application.

Categories
Politics

FBI to help investigation, no U.S. troop plans

The crowd reacts near the Petionville Police station where armed men, accused of being involved in the assassination of President Jovenel Moise, are being detained in Port au Prince on July 8, 2021.

Valerie Baeriswl | AFP | Getty Images

The U.S. is sending senior FBI and DHS officials to Port-au-Prince as soon as possible to assist with the investigation into the assassination of Haitian President Jovenel Moise, the White House said Friday, in response to the Haitian government’s formal request for assistance.

“The United States remains engaged and in close consultations with our Haitian and international partners to support the Haitian people in the aftermath of the assassination of the president,” White House press secretary Jen Psaki said at a press briefing.

However, the U.S. has no plans to send military assistance at this time, White House officials told NBC News on Friday afternoon, amid reports that Haitian officials had requested troops to secure critical infrastructure.

An FBI spokesperson said the agency is working with the U.S. Embassy in Haiti and law enforcement partners to determine how to assist with the investigation.

Haiti’s ambassador to the U.S., Bocchit Edmond, said on Friday that the Haitian government’s request outlined the “critical role” the FBI and the Justice Department can play in the investigation into the assassination. 

Edmond added that the Haitian government also requested the U.S. impose sanctions on perpetrators involved in the attack under the Global Magnitsky Act, which authorizes the U.S. president to deny entry to and impose economic sanctions against any foreign individual responsible for extrajudicial killings or human rights abuses.

“We look forward to engaging with our US partners as we seek truth and justice,” Edmond said in a series of posts on Twitter.

Colombia has also announced that it will be assisting with the probe, Reuters reported Friday. Colombian President Ivan Duque said the head of Colombia’s national intelligence directorate and the intelligence director for the national police will be sent to Haiti with Interpol.

The U.S. State Department confirmed on Friday that two Americans have been arrested by Haitian authorities following the president’s assassination.

“We are aware of the arrest of two U.S. citizens in Haiti and are monitoring the situation closely,” a State Department spokesperson told CNBC. “We remain committed to cooperating with Haitian authorities on the investigation.”

The State Department declined to comment any further, citing privacy considerations, and pointed to Haitian authorities for further information.

Haitian police on Friday identified the American suspects, who are of Haitian descent, as James Solages and Joseph Vincent. Solages, 35, is the youngest of the suspects, and Vincent, 55, is the oldest, according to a document shared by Mathias Pierre, Haiti’s minister of elections.

They are among at least 20 suspects that Haitian police have detained so far in the shocking assassination, alongside 18 Colombians.

The search continues for at least five additional suspects, and four others were killed by police in an exchange of gunfire, according to Haitian police. Haiti Chief of Police Leon Charles on Thursday urged the Haitian public to help authorities locate the other suspects but not to “take justice into their own hands.”

U.S. President Joe Biden on Wednesday condemned the assassination and said he was “shocked and saddened to hear” about it.

“The United States offers condolences to the people of Haiti, and we stand ready to assist as we continue to work for a safe and secure Haiti,” Biden said in a statement. 

Citizens take part in a protest near the police station of Petion Ville after Haitian president Jovenel Moïse was murdered on July 08, 2021 in Port-au-Prince, Haiti.

Getty Images

A group of gunmen assassinated Moise and wounded his wife in their private residence Wednesday, plunging the Caribbean nation into an even deeper political crisis that has been fueled by gang violence and protests against the late president’s increasingly authoritarian rule. 

Claude Joseph, Haiti’s interim prime minister, said the police and military were now in control of security in Haiti. Authorities declared a siege in the country following the killing and closed the international airport. 

Edmond has called for an international investigation into the assassination and has asked the U.S. for assistance in bolstering Haitian security. 

The State Department on Thursday vehemently denied that the Drug Enforcement Administration was involved in the assassination after the attackers reportedly identified themselves as DEA agents. 

Edmond has said the attackers were posing as DEA agents, describing them as “well-trained professional killers, commandos” based on a video shot from a neighbor’s house during the attack. He also noted that some spoke Spanish. Haitians speak French and Creole. 

Protests against the late Haitian president turned violent in recent months as opposition leaders and their supporters demanded his resignation.

Moise had been accused of seeking to increase his power even after his term expired in February. Opposition leaders pointed to his approval of decrees limiting powers of a court that audits the government and his creation of an intelligence agency that answers only to him.

Opposition leaders and their supporters also rejected Moise’s plans to hold a constitutional referendum with controversial proposals that would strengthen the presidency’s power.

— The Associated Press contributed to this report.

Categories
Health

F.D.A. Requests Federal Investigation of Alzheimer’s Drug Approval

The Food and Drug Administration on Friday called for a federal investigation into the process that led to the approval of a new drug for Alzheimer’s disease that has sparked harsh criticism from lawmakers and the medical community.

In a letter to the independent office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health, Acting Commissioner of the FDA, Dr. Janet Woodcock, the scrutiny the agency has been through regarding the approval process for the drug known as Aduhelm. She pointed to interactions between representatives from drug developer Biogen and the agency, saying that some “may have occurred outside of the formal correspondence process”.

“To the extent that these concerns could undermine public confidence in the FDA’s decision, I believe it is critical that the disputed events be verified by an independent body,” wrote Dr. Woodcock. She noted that the review should investigate whether communications between agency staff and Biogen representatives violated FDA rules.

The unusual request to examine the decision-making process of one’s own employees for an individual drug approval is likely to exacerbate the controversy surrounding the approval of Aduhelm. The FDA approved the drug a month ago, overcoming stout objections from its own independent advisors who said there wasn’t enough evidence to know if the drug was effective.

After the decision, three of these experts left an FDA advisory panel.

Dr. Woodcock’s request for an investigation came a day after the FDA narrowed its recommendations on who should receive the drug. After initially being recommended for all Alzheimer’s patients, the agency’s new guidelines should only prescribe it to people with mild cognitive problems.

Biogen did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

STAT, the medical news organization, first reported that Dr. Billy Dunn, the agency’s head of neuroscience, in early May 2019 held an off-the-book meeting with a Biogen manager, Dr. Al Sandrock, exit. While it is not uncommon for pharmaceutical company executives to meet frequently with FDA officials, it is uncommon to provide data that would be part of an FDA application outside of a formal framework.

A few months earlier, Biogen had discontinued two late-stage studies of the drug after early analysis found the drug would not prove effective. However, the Biogen researchers who analyzed the data soon concluded that the decision to stop the studies was premature and that the drug might be effective after all.

The meeting between Dr. Dunn and Dr. Sandrock was a first step in resuming the talks that led to approval last month.

Categories
Politics

Trump Group and High Government Are Indicted in Tax Investigation

After raising their sons on Long Island, Mr. Weisselberg and his wife moved into a Trump-branded building on Manhattan’s West Side, where they lived rent-free for years. He bought a home in South Florida, not far from Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, and traveled there and back on weekends on Mr. Trump’s jet. His older son, Barry, went to work for the company managing Wollman Rink in Central Park and acted as the D.J. for Mr. Trump’s Christmas parties, where Allen Weisselberg let loose on the dance floor, according to people who attended. In 2004, Mr. Weisselberg appeared in an episode of “The Apprentice,” Mr. Trump’s reality television show.

“They are like Batman and Robin,” said Barry Weisselberg’s ex-wife, Jennifer, who has aided Mr. Vance’s investigation after a contentious divorce. “They’re a team. They’re not best friends. They don’t spend all their time together, but the world became so insular for Allen that he did not know anything else.”

Mr. Weisselberg had become so woven into the fabric of the Trump Organization that when Mr. Trump moved into the White House in 2017, he entrusted Mr. Weisselberg, along with the former president’s adult sons, with running his company. His earnings reflected his importance: Between 2007 and 2017, his total pay averaged nearly $800,000 a year; in 2018, he earned more than $977,000 in salary and deferred compensation, according to tax return data obtained by The New York Times as part of an investigation published last year.

A lawyer for Mr. Weisselberg, Mary E. Mulligan, declined to comment. A lawyer for the Trump Organization could not immediately be reached for comment.

Even before the indictment, Mr. Weisselberg had in recent years been drawn publicly into Mr. Trump’s controversies and scandals, including investigations over the misuse of charitable funds by the Donald J. Trump Foundation and payments to women on Mr. Trump’s behalf to buy their silence about affairs they said they had with Mr. Trump.

Mr. Trump’s former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, testified in Congress that Mr. Weisselberg had helped orchestrate a cover-up to reimburse him for a $130,000 payment to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels, and that together they had concocted phony valuations of the company’s real estate holdings to suit Mr. Trump’s needs at any given moment.

Categories
Politics

Bitcoin Is Truly Traceable, Pipeline Investigation Reveals

When Bitcoin hit the market in 2009, fans touted the cryptocurrency as a secure, decentralized, and anonymous way to conduct transactions outside of the traditional financial system.

Criminals, often operating in hidden areas of the internet, flocked to Bitcoin to do illegal business without revealing their name or location. The digital currency quickly became just as popular with drug dealers and tax evaders as it was with contrarian libertarians.

But this week’s revelation that federal officials recovered most of the Bitcoin ransom paid in the Colonial Pipeline’s recent ransomware attack revealed a fundamental misconception about cryptocurrencies: they’re not as difficult to track as cybercriminals think they are.

On Monday, the Justice Department announced that it had tracked 63.7 of the 75 bitcoins – about $ 2.3 million of the $ 4.3 million – that Colonial Pipeline paid to the hackers when the ransomware attack took place the company’s computer systems had shut down, leading to fuel shortages and an increase in revenue for gasoline prices. Officials have since declined to provide any further details on how they precisely recovered the bitcoin, which was fluctuating in value.

Yet for the growing community of cryptocurrency enthusiasts and investors, the fact that federal investigators tracked the ransom as it moved through at least 23 different electronic accounts from DarkSide, the hacking collective, before accessing an account, showed that law enforcement grew with the industry.

That’s because the same properties that make cryptocurrencies attractive to cyber criminals – the ability to instantly transfer money without a bank’s permission – can be used by law enforcement agencies to track and track criminals’ funds at the speed of the internet confiscate.

Bitcoin is also traceable. While digital currency can be created, moved and stored outside the jurisdiction of a government or financial institution, every payment is recorded on a permanent fixed ledger called a blockchain.

This means that all Bitcoin transactions are open. The Bitcoin ledger can be viewed by anyone connected to the blockchain.

“It’s digital breadcrumbs,” said Kathryn Haun, former federal prosecutor and investor in the venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz. “There’s a path that law enforcement can follow pretty well.”

Ms. Haun added that the speed with which the Justice Department confiscated most of the ransom was “groundbreaking” precisely because of the use of cryptocurrencies by hackers. In contrast, she said, obtaining records from banks often requires months or years of searching through paperwork and red tape, especially when those banks are overseas based.

Given the public nature of the ledger, cryptocurrency experts said, all law enforcement agencies need to do is figure out how to connect the criminals to a digital wallet that holds the bitcoins. To do this, the authorities have likely focused on what is known as a “public key” and a “private key”.

A public key is the sequence of numbers and letters that Bitcoin holders use to transact with others, while a “private key” is used to keep a wallet secure. Tracking down a user’s transaction history was a matter of determining which public key they controlled, authorities said.

The seizure of the assets then required obtaining the private key, which is more difficult. It is unclear how federal agents got hold of DarkSide’s private key.

Justice Department spokesman Marc Raimondi declined to say more about how the FBI confiscated DarkSide’s private key. According to court documents, investigators accessed the password for one of the hackers’ Bitcoin wallets, but did not do exactly how.

The FBI didn’t seem to be relying on any underlying flaw in blockchain technology, cryptocurrency experts said. The most likely culprit was good old-fashioned policing.

Federal agents could have confiscated DarkSide’s private keys by infiltrating a human spy into DarkSide’s network, hacking computers that stored their private keys and passwords, or forcing the service holding their private wallet to do so to surrender them by warrant or other means.

“If they get their hands on the keys, they can be confiscated,” said Jesse Proudman, founder of Makara, a cryptocurrency investment site. “Just relying on a blockchain does not solve this fact.”

The FBI has partnered with several companies that specialize in tracking cryptocurrencies across digital accounts, according to officials, court documents and the companies. Startups with names like TRM Labs, Elliptic, and Chainalysis, tracking cryptocurrency payments and exposing possible criminal activity, have emerged as law enforcement agencies and banks seek to forestall financial crime.

Their technology tracks blockchains in search of patterns that suggest illegal activity. It’s similar to how Google and Microsoft tamed email spam by identifying and then blocking accounts that distribute email links across hundreds of accounts.

“Cryptocurrency allows us to use these tools to track funds and financial flows along the blockchain in ways we could never do with cash,” said Ari Redbord, general manager of legal at TRM Labs, a blockchain intelligence company who sells its analytics software to law enforcement agencies and banks. Previously, he was senior financial intelligence and terrorism advisor at the Treasury Department.

Several longtime cryptocurrency enthusiasts said recovering much of the Bitcoin ransom is a win for the legitimacy of digital currencies. That would help change Bitcoin’s image as a criminal playground, they said.

“The public is slowly being shown on a case-by-case basis that Bitcoin is good for law enforcement and bad for crime – the opposite of what many have believed in the past,” said Hunter Horsley, CEO of Bitwise Asset Management, a cryptocurrency company. Investment company.

In the last few months, cryptocurrencies have become more and more mainstream. Companies like PayPal and Square have expanded their cryptocurrency services. Coinbase, a startup that enables people to buy and sell cryptocurrencies, went public in April and is now valued at $ 47 billion. Over the weekend, a Bitcoin conference in Miami drew more than 12,000 attendees, including Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and former boxer Floyd Mayweather Jr.

As more and more people use Bitcoin, most of them access the digital currency in a way that mirrors a traditional bank, through a centralized intermediary such as a crypto exchange. In the United States, anti-money laundering and identity verification laws require such services to know who their customers are, thereby establishing a link between identity and account. Customers must upload an official ID when registering.

Ransomware attacks have taken a close look at unregulated crypto exchanges. Cyber ​​criminals are flocking to thousands of high risk areas in Eastern Europe that do not obey these laws.

After the attack on the Colonial Pipeline, several financial leaders proposed a ban on cryptocurrencies.

“We can live in a cryptocurrency world or a world without ransomware, but we cannot have both,” Lee Reiners, executive director of the Global Financial Markets Center at Duke Law School, wrote in the Wall Street Journal.

Cryptocurrency experts said the hackers could have tried to make their Bitcoin accounts even more secure. Some cryptocurrency holders go to great lengths to store their private keys for everything connected to the Internet in what is known as a “cold wallet”. Some people remember the sequence of numbers and letters. Others write them down on paper, although they can be obtained through search warrants or police work.

“The only way to preserve the truly invulnerable characteristics of the asset class is to memorize the keys and not have them written down anywhere,” said Mr Proudman.

Justice Department Mr Raimondi said the ransom seizure through the Colonial Pipeline was the federal prosecutor’s latest stabbing operation to recover illegally acquired cryptocurrency. He said the department had “many hundreds of millions of dollars of seizures of non-hosted cryptocurrency wallets” used for criminal activity.

In January, the Justice Department disrupted another ransomware group, NetWalker, which was using ransomware to extort money from communities, hospitals, law enforcement agencies and schools.

As part of that sting, the department received approximately $ 500,000 of the cryptocurrency from NetWalker that was collected from victims of their ransomware.

“While these individuals believe they are acting anonymously in the digital space, we have the ability and tenacity to identify and prosecute these actors to the fullest extent of the law and confiscate their criminal proceeds,” said Maria Chapa Lopez, then US Attorney for the Middle East District of Florida said when the case became known.

In February, the Justice Department announced that it had arrest warrants for the seizure of nearly $ 2 million in cryptocurrencies that North Korean hackers had stolen and debited from two different cryptocurrency exchanges.

Last August, the department also unsealed a complaint against North Korean hackers who stole $ 28.7 million in cryptocurrencies from a cryptocurrency exchange and then laundered the proceeds through Chinese cryptocurrency laundering services. The FBI traced the funds to 280 cryptocurrency wallets and their owners.

In the end, “cryptocurrencies are actually more transparent than most other forms of value transfer,” said Madeleine Kennedy, a spokeswoman for Chainalysis, the start-up that tracks payments in cryptocurrencies. “Certainly more transparent than cash.”

Categories
Politics

ProPublica tax leak investigation will probably be precedence, Lawyer Basic Garland says

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland previously testified at a hearing of the Senate Subcommittee on Funds for Commerce, Justice, Science and Allied Agencies on the proposed 2022 budget for the Department of Justice on June 9, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Susan Walsh | AFP | Getty Images

Attorney General Merrick Garland told lawmakers Wednesday that investigating the source of a massive taxpayer information leak behind an article by investigative news agency ProPublica will be one of its top priorities.

“I promise it will be at the top of my list,” Garland assured Senator Susan Collins, R-Maine, during a budget hearing before the Senate Grants Committee.

The former federal judge said he knew nothing at the moment but what he had learned from reading the long article that revealed that in recent years billionaires like Amazon boss Jeff Bezos, Tesla boss Elon Musk and businessmen Michael Bloomberg , Carl Icahn and George Soros paid no federal income taxes.

“Senator, I take this as seriously as you do. I remember very well what was President [Richard] Nixon did it in the Watergate period – making lists of enemies and punishing people by checking their tax returns, ”Garland said. “This is extremely serious business. People are of course entitled to a great deal of privacy with regard to their tax returns. “

The ProPublica article, which is expected to be the first in a series, did not reveal how the journalists obtained the tax records, and the outlet did not respond to a request for comment. The article said the research was based on “an enormous treasure trove of data from the Internal Revenue Service on the tax returns of thousands of the richest people in the country, covering more than 15 years.”

The article adds that the tax strategies used by the ultra-rich individuals quoted appeared to be perfectly legal. The investigation is said to “destroy the cornerstone of the American tax system: everyone pays their fair share and the richest Americans pay the most.”

The outlet published a separate article defending its decision to publish the private records.

Tax information is generally confidential and those who disclosed the documents can be prosecuted.

Garland said he believed IRS Commissioner Charles Rettig was working on the matter.

“He said their inspectors were working on it, and I’m sure that means it will go to the Justice Department,” Garland said. “This was on my list of things to raise after I finished preparing for this hearing.”

Rettig said during a Senate Finance Committee hearing Tuesday that he shared “every American’s concern about the sensitive and private nature and confidentiality of information received by the IRS.”

Garland’s comments came as the Justice Department, acting on President Joe Biden’s orders, sought to move away from the aggressive tactics used against journalists and media organizations under former President Donald Trump and previous administrations.

On Saturday, the ministry said it would refrain from confiscating reporters’ records when investigating leaks, “in alteration of its longstanding practice.” Last month, Biden called this practice “simply wrong” even though his position had not yet been formalized as a guideline.

Also on Wednesday, Garland defended the Justice Department against criticism from the left that it was not moving fast enough to distance itself from the Trump administration.

On Monday, the ministry filed a controversial letter to effectively defeat a case against Trump by columnist E. Jean Carroll who claims Trump defamed her when he denied the rape. Senator Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., Asked Garland, “How does this come about.”

“Are these criticisms justified?” Leahy asked.

“I know the criticisms,” Garland replied. “The Justice Department’s role in making legal decisions is not to assist a previous or current government. Our job is to represent the American people. “

Sometimes, Garland said, “we have to make a decision about the law that we would never have made and that we strictly disagree with on political grounds.”

Subscribe to CNBC Pro for the TV livestream, deep insights and analytics.

Categories
Health

WHO says Covid origin investigation is being ‘poisoned by politics’

Executive Director of the World Health Organization’s (WHO) emergencies program Mike Ryan speaks at a news conference on the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Geneva, Switzerland.

Denis Balibouse | Reuters

A top World Health Organization official said Friday that investigations into the origins of Covid-19 are being “poisoned by politics.”

U.S. President Joe Biden announced Wednesday that he’s ordered intelligence agencies to conduct “a report on their most up-to-date analysis of the origins of Covid-19, including whether it emerged from human contact with an infected animal or from a laboratory accident.”

The WHO has come under increasing pressure in recent days from U.S. and European officials to take another look at whether the coronavirus could have escaped from a lab in Wuhan, China, after a previously undisclosed U.S. intelligence report came to light, revealing that three researchers sought hospital care after falling ill with Covid-like symptoms in November 2019.

Dr. Mike Ryan, executive director of WHO’s Health Emergencies Program, asked if countries could separate the politics from the science.

“Putting WHO in a position like it has been put in is very unfair to the science we’re trying to carry out, and it puts us as an organization, frankly, in an impossible position to deliver the answers that the world wants,” Ryan said at a news briefing.

The WHO has been repeatedly accused of allowing the Chinese government to avoid a thorough investigation into the origins of Covid-19, which was first discovered in Wuhan in late 2019. At a Senate hearing earlier this week Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., pressed White House chief medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci on the WHO’s close ties to China.

“Can we agree that if you took (Chinese) President Xi Jinping and turned him upside down and shook him, the World Health Organization would fall out of his pocket?” Fauci responded by saying that he has no way of knowing China’s influence on the agency.

The hypothesis that Covid-19 came from a Wuhan virology lab was initially dismissed as a right-wing conspiracy theory, but it’s been gaining traction in recent weeks.

The majority of the intelligence community believes that it is equally plausible that the virus originated in a lab and in an animal. Federal health officials continue to maintain their position that it is more likely that the virus has zoonotic origins. The CDC’s website still states “we know that it originally came from an animal, likely a bat.”