Categories
Politics

Biden Inherits Household Separation Disaster From Trump

“I can’t wait for the day I wake up from this nightmare,” said 34-year-old Xiomara, who spoke on condition that she could only be identified by her first name for security reasons.

One of her last acts of motherhood was bathing and dressing her daughter after she heard from border officials that Briselda, then 8, was being taken away. She said she watched helplessly as officers escorted Briselda to a number of children, most of whom were crying and waiting to get into a van that drove to the airport.

For her daughter’s safety, Xiomara said she preferred Briselda to stay in the United States with her family rather than return to her in El Salvador. They’re in regular contact on WhatsApp, she said, but the removal has taken an emotional toll, and Xiomara has battled depression and recently started seeing a therapist.

Others, despite their reunification, continue to suffer from the effects.

Fifteen days passed before Oscar, a Honduran immigrant imprisoned in McAllen, Texas, heard from his then eight-year-old son Daniel, from whom he had been separated.

“I felt angry. I went crazy, ”recalls Oscar, 35, who spoke on condition that he could only be identified by his middle name.

On one tearful phone call, his son announced that he was living in a Houston animal shelter. The father and son were reunited after 33 days by order of a judge and moved to Charlotte, NC

Since then, Oscar has grappled with how to help his son, whom he described as “not the same boy since we split up”. Daniel runs away when he sees someone in police uniform and wakes up at night screaming, Oscar said.

Categories
Health

Biden Inherits a Vaccine Provide Unlikely to Develop Earlier than April

As the Biden administration takes power with a pledge to tame the most dire public health crisis in a century, one pillar of its strategy is to significantly increase the supply of Covid-19 vaccines.

But federal health officials and corporate executives agree that it will be impossible to increase the immediate supply of vaccines before April because of lack of manufacturing capacity. The administration should first focus, experts say, on fixing the hodgepodge of state and local vaccination centers that has proved incapable of managing even the current flow of vaccines.

President Biden’s goal of one million shots a day for the next 100 days, they say, is too low and will arguably leave tens of millions of doses unused. Data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention suggests that the nation has already reached that milestone pace. About 1.1 million people received shots last Friday, after an average of 911,000 people a day received them on the previous two days.

That was true even though C.D.C. data indicates that states and localities are administering as few as 46 percent of the doses that the federal government is shipping to them. An efficient vaccination regimen could deliver millions more shots.

“I love that he set a goal, but a million doses a day?” said Dr. Paul A. Offit, the director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and a member of a federal vaccine advisory board.

“I think we can do better,” he said. “We are going to have to if we really want to get on top of this virus by, say, summer.”

The pace of vaccination is critical not just to curbing disease and death but also to heading off the impact of more infectious forms of the virus. The C.D.C. has warned that one variant, which is thought to be 50 percent more contagious, might become the dominant source of infection in the United States by March. Although public health experts are optimistic that the existing vaccines will be effective against that variant, known as B.1.1.7, it may drive up the infection rate if enough people remain unvaccinated.

The current vaccination effort, which has little central direction, has sown confusion and frustration. Some localities are complaining they are running out of doses while others have unused vials sitting on shelves.

Mr. Biden is asking Congress for $20 billion to vastly expand vaccination centers to include stadiums, pharmacies, doctors’ offices and mobile clinics. He also wants to hire 100,000 health care workers and to use federal disaster relief funds to reimburse states and local governments for vaccination costs.

Dr. Mark B. McClellan, the director of Duke University’s health policy center, said those moves should help clear the bottlenecks and “push the number beyond a million doses a day and probably significantly beyond.”

The nation’s vaccine supply in the first three months of the year is expected to substantially exceed what is needed to meet the administration’s goal. According to a senior administration official, Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna have been ramping up and are now on track to deliver up to 18 million doses a week. Together, they have pledged to deliver 200 million doses by the end of March. A third vaccine maker, Johnson & Johnson, might also come through with more doses. If all of that supply were used, the nation could average well over two million shots a day.

Asked Thursday afternoon by a reporter if one million shots a day was enough, Mr. Biden said: “When I announced it, you all said it’s not possible. Come on, give me a break, man. It’s a good start.”

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine?

While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.

When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated?

Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.

If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask?

Yes, but not forever. The two vaccines that will potentially get authorized this month clearly protect people from getting sick with Covid-19. But the clinical trials that delivered these results were not designed to determine whether vaccinated people could still spread the coronavirus without developing symptoms. That remains a possibility. We know that people who are naturally infected by the coronavirus can spread it while they’re not experiencing any cough or other symptoms. Researchers will be intensely studying this question as the vaccines roll out. In the meantime, even vaccinated people will need to think of themselves as possible spreaders.

Will it hurt? What are the side effects?

The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection won’t be any different from ones you’ve gotten before. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. But some of them have felt short-lived discomfort, including aches and flu-like symptoms that typically last a day. It’s possible that people may need to plan to take a day off work or school after the second shot. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign: they are the result of your own immune system encountering the vaccine and mounting a potent response that will provide long-lasting immunity.

Will mRNA vaccines change my genes?

No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

The administration is promising to purchase even more vaccine doses as they become available from the vaccine makers, and to use the Defense Production Act to spur production. But federal health officials and corporate executives said those were longer-term goals because the supply for the first three months of the year was essentially fixed.

The Trump administration invoked the Defense Production Act to force suppliers to prioritize orders from Pfizer, Moderna and other vaccine makers whose products are still in development. Health officials said it was unclear how the new administration could use the law beyond that to boost production.

One senior federal health official involved in the government’s vaccine efforts said that Operation Warp Speed, the Trump administration’s crash development program, had looked at all available manufacturing capacity domestically and globally and that there was little space left to negotiate at this point. The official said that if there had been more doses available to the government in the first quarter, they would have been purchased.

Experts generally agree that the federal government should be locking in purchases of as many doses as possible because no one knows yet how long the vaccines will protect against the coronavirus, whether booster shots will be required and what threats mutations of the virus could pose.

From April and thereafter, the supply outlook brightens. Pfizer and Moderna have each committed to supply another 100 million doses by the end of July, and the companies might be able to provide even more. A week ago, Pfizer and BioNTech, its German partner, increased their global production target to 2 billion doses for the year from 1.3 billion doses.

Pfizer has delayed deliveries to European countries while it retools its Belgium factory to expand production. But at the firm’s factory in Kalamazoo, Mich., which supplies doses for Americans, production has quickened since the federal government ordered suppliers to prioritize Pfizer’s needs. The unexpected discovery that efficient syringes could extract a sixth dose from its vials also upped Pfizer’s estimates.

Moderna has also raised its production targets for the year to 600 million doses, up from 500 million.

Johnson & Johnson is expected to announce results from its vaccine trial within days. If that vaccine proves effective, it could drastically speed up the pace of vaccinations because unlike Moderna’s and Pfizer-BioNTech’s vaccines, it requires only one dose. The company could apply for emergency use authorization from the Food and Drug Administration as soon as the end of the month. While its manufacturing has lagged, Johnson & Johnson is trying to catch up to the goals detailed in the federal contract it signed last year.

The firm is now expected to deliver anywhere from several million to 12 million doses by the end of February, and 10 million to 20 million more doses at the end of March or the first week in April, according to several people familiar with the firm’s manufacturing output. The first batch would be produced at its Dutch factory, and later batches at a factory in Baltimore operated by its manufacturing partner, Emergent BioSolutions.

But to deliver the second batch that quickly, federal regulators may have to agree to delay certain manufacturing reviews of the vaccine from the Baltimore plant, according to people familiar with the situation. Those discussions are now underway.

Johnson & Johnson is also in preliminary talks with Merck, a major American pharmaceutical company, about using its production lines, one of several ideas that federal health officials discussed with the Biden transition team. Federal officials are interested in boosting the nation’s vaccine-making power long-term, and Merck’s facilities may be among the few with remaining manufacturing capability.

But Dr. McClellan, who sits on Johnson & Johnson’s board of directors, said it would take months to adapt Merck’s factory to produce Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine. A senior administration official predicted that it could take until the end of the year.

Other vaccine makers may also come through by midyear. Novavax has worked to iron out what were recently dire manufacturing problems that delayed its clinical trials. Moncef Slaoui, the scientific head of the federal vaccine development program in the Trump administration, said in a recent interview that Novavax could apply for emergency use authorization in late April. The government has already ordered 110 million doses of the Novavax vaccine, to be delivered by the end of June, and Novavax has said it believes it can meet that target.

Mr. Biden has surrounded himself with new health officials assigned to getting vaccines from factories to recipients, including Dr. Bechara Choucair, the former Chicago health commissioner who is the White House’s vaccinations coordinator, and Tim Manning, a former top official at the Federal Emergency Management Agency who is now the supply coordinator. Dr. David Kessler, the former F.D.A. commissioner, will help lead the federal government’s vaccine development program at the Department of Health and Human Services, with special attention to manufacturing.

After both the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines proved to be highly effective in clinical trials late last year, the Trump administration considered whether to rethink its strategy of backing six different vaccine makers and instead throw all of its weight behind the proven producers. One senior administration official described “countless hours of debate” over the issue.

In the end, officials decided it was critical to keep aiming for a broad portfolio of vaccines, in part because no one has figured out which vaccines might work best for children or be most effective against emerging variants. They recommended that the Biden administration do the same.

Katie Thomas and Donald G. McNeil Jr. contributed reporting.

Categories
Health

This Is the Well being System That Biden Inherits From Trump

President-elect Joe Biden will inherit a healthcare system that seeks to cater to a population made sicker from both coronavirus and skipped care while trying to make up for the money lost in 2020.

But he will face another immediate challenge: hospitals that tend to care for the poor and vulnerable are under great financial pressure, while wealthier hospital systems expect them to be easily injured but not broken.

“All of this will increase inequality,” said Alan Morgan, president of the National Rural Health Association. “There’s no way around it.”

The policies that Mr Biden adopts in his early months as president – such as how to pay for telemedicine visits as the pandemic progresses, or whether to provide additional incentives for health care providers – will be critical to shaping the long-term future of the health system.

“Every crisis brings change, and it will clearly make big changes,” said David Cutler, a Harvard health economist who served as a health advisor in the Obama administration. “We don’t know yet whether it will be good or bad.”

American doctors and hospitals have been used to constant growth in spending for decades. But 2020 was on track to be the only year in this era that healthcare spending is falling. Even if the pandemic overwhelms the capacity of some providers, they appear to be losing money due to the numerous profitable election processes that were canceled this spring.

For Mr Biden, this likely means fights between hospitals, insurers and patient advocates who fear that the equality gains made by the Affordable Care Act have been undermined. Healthcare providers, who typically care for vulnerable populations, may face difficult decisions between closing down or selling to a larger competitor.

“The health system lost a lot of money when people didn’t show up in March and April,” Cutler said. “It is not clear whether the money will be returned. I assume that a wave of providers will go under, demanding higher prices and bailouts. “

Pick almost any metric and it will show the tremendous growth of the American healthcare system over the past few years. Total healthcare spending soared from $ 2.9 trillion in 2010 to $ 3.6 trillion this year, driven by medical prices that rose faster than inflation. Healthcare jobs grew at the same time, peaking at 16.5 million workers in February.

The number of policyholders increased significantly in the 2010s, largely due to the expansion of insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act. Even with some setbacks under President Trump, the uninsured rate is still lower than it was at the beginning of the decade, about 9 percent last year, up from 16 percent in 2010.

The growth of the past decade has not only meant more money poured into hospitals and doctor’s offices. It also appears to have made access to health care and certain health outcomes more equitable.

For example, the expansion of coverage under the Health Act had an overwhelming impact on the insurance of Black Americans and Latinos and the reduction in the disparity in uninsured rates. In 2013, there was a 25.7 percentage point gap between the uninsured rates for Hispanic and White Americans. By 2018, that number had dropped to 16.3 percentage points, a study by the nonprofit Commonwealth Fund found.

Medicaid’s expansion into many states is credited with keeping rural hospitals operating. Some research has found that the expansion reduced unequal outcomes in areas such as maternal and child mortality.

Now experts see that these profits are diminishing. The change began under the Trump administration, which restricted the promotion of health law and allowed states to impose new restrictions on the registration of Medicaid. One million Americans lost coverage between 2017 and 2019. Experts were particularly alarmed by the decline in public coverage among children.

The trend accelerated with the pandemic and a sharp drop in medical revenues this spring. Hospitals across the country lost billions when patients canceled lucrative procedures like hip replacements and cataract surgeries. Family doctors struggled to stay open as check-up dates dropped. Federal aid compensated for some, but not all, of these losses. Experts working on the health system now believe that much of the care canceled this spring will not be postponed.

Updated

Apr. 18, 2020 at 2:27 am ET

Safety net health systems, which because of their mission or mandate to provide care regardless of people’s ability to pay, say they are already starting to push richer hospitals forward. Employment in the health sector is recovering: around two thirds of the 1.5 million jobs lost during the recession have returned. However, there is evidence that these profits are not evenly distributed.

Mr. Morgan of the Rural Health Association hears from members who say they are having trouble keeping nurses. Some workers are getting better-paid offers from wealthier health systems who need traveling nurses to help fight the pandemic.

“Two weeks ago I heard from a hospital director that he was losing his clinical staff because they could make more money elsewhere,” he said. “His clinical staff are going offline in the middle of a pandemic. It’s a workforce crisis. “

Margaret Mary Health System, who operates a 90-year-old nonprofit hospital in rural Indiana, predicts a 4 percent deficit this year, even after factoring in state aid payments. The hospital has treated hundreds of coronavirus patients who sometimes occupied 23 of the hospital’s 25 beds.

“It all makes it so difficult, how hard we’ve worked this year,” said Tim Putnam, the hospital’s general manager. “We have invested so much to serve our community and it is difficult to suffer a loss as a financial result.”

Before the pandemic, Margaret Mary’s executives felt they had solid financial foundations. The hospital received a boost from Indiana’s Medicaid expansion in 2015. It looked so good last year that it decided to purchase a new electronic health record system.

Margaret Mary is now preparing for even greater financial losses after Indiana announced on Thursday that it would again suspend elective health procedures.

“It’s hard to pinpoint where this ends until we figure out how the pandemic ends,” Putnam said. “To remain viable and continue to serve our community, we need to do better than breakeven and we need to find a way to do it in 2021.”

North Oaks Medical Center in Hammond, La., Is a public hospital serving mostly low-income patients. It was planning its “best fiscal year in the history of the hospital” before the pandemic broke out, said chairman Michele Sutton.

Instead, it took many workers off this spring to break even. North Oaks encountered issues that a hospital with more affluent patients would not face – such as the fact that many of its patients did not have reliable access to the Internet to support video doctor visits.

“Because our community is poor, we didn’t have much access to telemedicine,” said Ms. Sutton. “We didn’t have the fiber capacity.”

Her hospital had to do extra work to set up wards where doctors could video chat with their patients, something other healthcare systems didn’t have to wear. Now it is preparing for another difficult year of treating sick patients.

“We’re seeing an increase in suicide, a lot more strokes, a lot more heart attacks,” Ms. Sutton said, “and a decrease in routine maintenance for fear of getting Covid.”

Some of the early decisions the Biden team is facing are small, practical: Should Medicare continue to pay the high but temporary reimbursement rates it offered for telemedicine visits this year, a signal that would encourage private plans to to do the same?

“Imagine that I am a general practitioner, I am already having great financial success and trying to decide: am I making a large investment in telemedicine or not?” said Dr. Ateev Mehrotra, a Harvard health researcher. “It’s hard for a clinical practice not to know what you’ll get paid for in a week or two.”

Other decisions are more extensive, e.g. For example, whether additional incentives should be provided for healthcare providers and how they should be allocated.

Doctors know that patients have put off some treatments and are preparing for the consequences. Dr. Mehrotra and his colleagues released research this week that found fewer patients starting treatment for opioid addiction during the pandemic, as some providers feel uncomfortable about prescribing a new drug without a face-to-face meeting.

The Biden government’s guidelines will help determine how providers are caring for this sick population as health coverage decreases. To increase the number of signups, the administration could use waivers to expand Medicaid coverage or restore the Affordable Care Act advertising budget. Major expansions to coverage, such as a public option that would allow all Americans to sign up for Medicare, would require Congressional approval.

“There is a large population that worries me very much that they have diabetes, high blood pressure, and heart failure and that has postponed all that care,” said Dr. Mehrotra. “The accumulation of inadequate care creates complications. But at this point it is unclear what exactly these complications of the disease will look like. “