Categories
Health

CDC research reveals 74% of individuals contaminated in Massachusetts Covid outbreak had been absolutely vaccinated

Boston EMS medics work to resuscitate a patient on the way to the ambulance amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Boston, Massachusetts, April 27, 2020.

Brian Snyder | Reuters

About three-fourths of people infected in a Massachusetts Covid-19 outbreak were fully vaccinated against the coronavirus, according to new data published Friday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The new data, published in the U.S. agency’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, also found that fully vaccinated people who get infected carry as much of the virus in their nose as unvaccinated people, and could spread it to other individuals.

“This finding is concerning and was a pivotal discovery leading to CDC’s updated mask recommendation,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said in a statement. “The masking recommendation was updated to ensure the vaccinated public would not unknowingly transmit virus to others, including their unvaccinated or immunocompromised loved ones.”

On Tuesday, the CDC reversed course on its prior guidance and recommended fully vaccinated Americans who live in areas with high Covid infection rates resume wearing face masks indoors. The guidelines cover about two-thirds of the U.S. population, according to a CNBC analysis.

While the delta variant continues to hit unvaccinated people the hardest, some vaccinated people could be carrying higher levels of the virus than previously understood and are potentially transmitting it to others, Walensky told reporters on a call Tuesday. She added the variant behaves “uniquely differently from past strains of the virus.”

A CDC document that was reviewed by CNBC warned that the delta variant sweeping across the country is as contagious as chickenpox, has a longer transmission window than the original Covid strain and may make older people sicker, even if they’ve been fully vaccinated.

Delta, now in at least 132 countries and already the dominant form of the disease in the United States, is more transmissible than the common cold, the 1918 Spanish flu, smallpox, Ebola, MERS and SARS, according to the document. Only measles appears to spread faster than the variant.

The data published Friday was based on 469 cases of Covid associated with multiple summer events and large public gatherings held in July in Barnstable County, Mass., according to the CDC. The events were held in an unnamed town in Barnstable, which encompasses Cape Cod and is just outside Martha’s Vineyard. Approximately three quarters, or 74%, of the cases occurred in fully vaccinated people who had completed a two-dose course of the mRNA vaccines or received a single dose of Johnson & Johnson’s.

Overall, 274 vaccinated patients with a breakthrough infection were symptomatic, according to the CDC. The most common side effects were cough, headache, sore throat, muscle pain and fever. Among five Covid patients who were hospitalized, four were fully vaccinated, according to the agency. No deaths were reported.

Testing identified the delta variant in 90% of specimens from 133 patients.

The CDC the data has limitations. The agency noted that as population-level vaccination coverage increases, vaccinated persons are likely to represent a larger proportion of Covid cases. Additionally, asymptomatic breakthrough infections might be underrepresented because of detection bias, the agency said.

The CDC also said the report is “insufficient” to draw conclusions about the effectiveness of the authorized vaccines against Covid, including the delta variant, during this outbreak.

Categories
Health

Dr. Scott Gottlieb estimates as much as 1 million Individuals contaminated with Covid every day as delta spreads

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration

Getty Images

Dr. Scott Gottlieb told CNBC on Friday he believes the coronavirus is significantly more widespread in the U.S. than official case counts reflect as the highly contagious delta variant sweeps the nation.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if, on the whole, we’re infecting up to a million people a day right now, and we’re just picking up maybe a 10th of that or less than a 10th of that,” the former Food and Drug Administration commissioner said in an interview on “Squawk Box.” Gottlieb now serves on the board of Covid vaccine maker Pfizer.

The current seven-day average of new daily coronavirus cases in the U.S. is roughly 67,000, according to a CNBC analysis of Johns Hopkins University data. That’s up 53% compared with a week ago, as the country grapples with a surge in new infections driven largely by delta, first discovered in India and now the dominant variant in the U.S.

The highest seven-day day average of new Covid cases recorded in the U.S. was roughly 251,000 on Jan. 8, according to CNBC’s analysis. Case counts had dropped off dramatically in the spring as the country’s vaccination campaign picked up speed.

But in recent weeks, as U.S. cases again started to accelerate, Gottlieb has said a large number of coronavirus infections were likely going unreported because the testing landscape is different now than at earlier stages in the pandemic.

For example, he previously told CNBC people can now complete at-home tests and those results are unlikely to make their way to health authorities and then show up in official case counts.

Additionally, Gottlieb has said vaccinated Americans who may become infected are likely to have a mild case or remain entirely asymptomatic, making them less likely to seek out a Covid test than they would’ve been before they were inoculated against the disease.

— CNBC’s Nate Rattner contributed to this report.

Disclosure: Scott Gottlieb is a CNBC contributor and is a member of the boards of Pfizer, genetic testing start-up Tempus, health-care tech company Aetion Inc. and biotech company Illumina. He also serves as co-chair of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings’ and Royal Caribbean’s “Healthy Sail Panel.”

Categories
Health

Beforehand contaminated individuals would profit from vaccines

Dr. Scott Gottlieb believes people who have previously been infected with coronavirus would still benefit from receiving Covid vaccines.

In Tuesday’s interview on CNBC’s “Squawk Box,” the former Food and Drug Administration commissioner acknowledged that some individuals may think their antibodies generated from having the disease offer enough protection against future infection or illness and, as a result, forgo getting the Covid inoculation.

The reason to still receive the vaccine is “two-fold,” contended Gottlieb, who serves on the board of vaccine maker Pfizer.

“One, we believe the vaccine provides a more durable and broader immunity, so it’s going to protect you better against the variants,” he said, alluding to the highly transmissible delta variant, which is causing concern for public health officials.

“Two, if you’ve been previously infected and even if you get a single dose of the vaccine — forget getting both doses of the vaccine, just a single dose of the vaccine — you get a very robust immune response,” Gottlieb said.

Pfizer’s vaccine requires two shots for fully immunity protection, as does Moderna’s vaccine. Johnson & Johnson makes a single-dose vaccine. Those are the only three vaccines approved for emergency use in the U.S.

“It’s sort of the best of both worlds if you’ve been previously infected and you get vaccinated,” said Gottlieb, who led the FDA from 2017 to 2019 in the Trump administration. “At least with one dose, you do develop a broad, very deep, very durable immunity based on the data that we’ve seen so far, so there’s still a lot of compelling reasons why you’d want to get vaccinated even if you’ve been previously infected.”

More than 157 million people in the U.S., or 47.4% of the population, have been fully vaccinated against Covid, according to data compiled by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Around 182.4 million people, or nearly 55% of the population, have received at least one dose.

After an aggressive push this spring to deliver the Covid shots to Americans, the pace of uptake slowed. In response, state and local officials — and businesses, too — launched various promotional efforts to encourage vaccination.

Nevertheless, among some people, hesitancy remains. According to the CDC, as of last week, about 1,000 counties in the U.S. had less than 30% of residents vaccinated.

The increasing presence of the delta variant, in both the U.S. and across the globe, adds urgency to calls for more people to get vaccinated. The variant, first discovered in India, has shown to make the vaccines slightly less effective, but still provide protection against severe disease, especially.

“We expect to see increased transmission in these communities unless we can vaccinate more people,” CDC Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said Thursday, referring to those roughly 1,000 U.S. counties with low vaccination rates.

“Preliminary data over the last six months suggest 99.5% of deaths from Covid-19 in the states have occurred in unvaccinated people,” she added. “The suffering and loss we are now seeing is nearly entirely avoidable.”

Disclosure: Scott Gottlieb is a CNBC contributor and is a member of the boards of Pfizer, genetic testing start-up Tempus, health-care tech company Aetion Inc. and biotech company Illumina. He also serves as co-chair of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings’ and Royal Caribbean’s “Healthy Sail Panel.”

Categories
Health

Ebola Survivor Contaminated Years In the past Could Have Began New Outbreak

Genetic sequences of virus samples from current patients were compared to those from the 2014-16 outbreak and found to be so similar that they must be closely related, the researchers said. The report, which went online on Friday, involved researchers from the Guinean Ministry of Health, other laboratories in the country, the Pasteur Institute in Senegal, the University of Edinburgh, the Medical Center of the University of Nebraska and the PraesensBio company.

The results were published on Friday by Science and Stat.

“There are very few genomic changes and for these to occur the virus must multiply,” said Dr. Conductor. “I think the virus is mostly in hibernation.”

“Among other things, it shows you the brilliant insights that molecular sequencing of the entire genome can provide,” he said. “Up until that point, we all thought the current outbreak was a result of the transmission of bats from nature. But it probably came from a human reservoir. “

Michael Wiley, a virologist at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and executive director of PraesensBio, which provided materials to study the samples, described the current outbreak as a “continuation” of the previous one.

He said persistent infections and sexual transmission were already detected during the outbreak in West Africa and during an outbreak in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Every new milestone for virus persistence was a shock, he said: first 180 days, then 500 days and now more than five years after the initial infection.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said in a statement from spokesman Thomas Skinner: “CDC has reviewed sequencing data from samples taken during the current outbreak in Guinea. While we can’t be 100 percent sure, CDC agrees that the data support the conclusion that cases of the current outbreak are likely to be related to cases in the region during the 2014-2016 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. “

He added, “This suggests that the outbreak likely came from persistent infection, survivor, rather than new introduction of the virus from the animal reservoir. While we have seen survivor-related outbreaks in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the amount of time between the end of the 2014-2016 outbreak and when this outbreak occurred is surprising, underscoring the need for further research to better understand the complex epidemiology of Ebola. “

Categories
Health

Virus Variant in Brazil Contaminated Many Who Had Already Recovered From Covid-19

Within a few weeks, two variants of the coronavirus have become so popular that you can regularly hear their unfathomable alphanumeric names on the television news.

B.1.1.7, first identified in the UK, has demonstrated the ability to spread widely and quickly. In South Africa, a mutant called B.1.351 can evade human antibodies and affect the effectiveness of some vaccines.

Scientists have also kept an eye on a third variant that originated in Brazil and is called P.1. Research on P.1 had been slower since its discovery in late December, so scientists weren’t sure how much to worry about it.

“I held my breath,” said Bronwyn MacInnis, an epidemiologist at the Broad Institute.

Now three studies offer a sobering story of P.1’s meteoric rise in the Amazonian city of Manaus. It most likely occurred there in November and then led to a record spike in coronavirus cases. It came to dominate the city in part because of an increased risk of contagion, research found.

However, the ability to infect some people who had immunity to previous attacks from Covid-19 was also gained. And laboratory experiments suggest that P.1 could weaken the protective effects of a Chinese vaccine currently used in Brazil.

The new studies have yet to be published in scientific journals. Their authors warn that findings from cells in laboratories do not always translate into the real world, and they have only just begun to understand how P.1 behaves.

“The results apply to Manaus, but I don’t know if they apply to other locations,” said Nuno Faria, a virologist at Imperial College London who led much of the new research.

But even with the puzzles that existed around P.1, experts said it was a variant that should be taken seriously. “It is right to be concerned about P.1, and this data gives us the reason why,” said William Hanage, epidemiologist at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health.

P.1 is now spreading across the rest of Brazil and has been found in 24 other countries. In the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has registered six cases in five states: Alaska, Florida, Maryland, Minnesota, and Oklahoma.

To reduce the risk of P.1 outbreaks and reinfections, Dr. Faria, it is important to double up on any measure to slow the spread of the coronavirus. Masks and social distancing can work against P.1. And vaccinations can help reduce transmission and protect those who become infected from serious illnesses.

“The ultimate message is that you need to step up all vaccination efforts as soon as possible,” he said. “You have to be one step ahead of the virus.”

Dr. Faria and his colleagues began tracking down the coronavirus when it exploded in Brazil last spring. Manaus, a city of two million people in the Brazilian Amazon, was particularly hard hit. At the height of spring, the Manaus cemeteries were overwhelmed by the corpses of the dead.

But after a peak in late April, Manaus appeared to have overcome the worst of the pandemic. Some scientists believed the decline meant Manaus had gained herd immunity.

Dr. Faria and his colleagues looked for coronavirus antibodies in samples from a Manaus blood bank in June and October. They found that roughly three-quarters of Manaus residents were infected.

However, towards the end of 2020, the number of new cases increased again. “There were actually far more cases than the previous peak of cases, which was in late April,” said Dr. Faria. “And that was very puzzling to us.”

To look for variants, Dr. Faria and his colleagues launched a new genome sequencing effort in town. While B.1.1.7 had arrived in other parts of Brazil, they did not find it in Manaus. Instead, they found a variant that no one had seen before.

Updated

March 1, 2021, 9:49 p.m. ET

Many variants in their samples shared a set of 21 mutations that were not seen in other viruses circulating in Brazil. Dr. Faria texted a colleague, “I think I’m seeing something really strange and I’m pretty worried about it.”

Some mutations in particular worried him, as scientists had already found them in B.1.1.7 or B.1.351. Experiments suggested that some of the mutations might make the variants better able to infect cells. Other mutations allow them to evade antibodies from previous infections or to be produced by vaccines.

While Dr. Faria and his colleagues analyzed their results, researchers in Japan made a similar discovery. Four tourists who returned home from a trip to the Amazon on Jan. 4 tested positive for the coronavirus. Genome sequencing revealed the same mutations that Dr. Faria and his colleagues in Brazil saw.

Dr. Faria and his colleagues posted a description of P.1 on an online virology forum on January 12th. Then they investigated why P.1 is so common. Its mutations could have made it more contagious, or it could have been lucky. Coincidentally, the variant might have surfaced in Manaus when the city became more relaxed about public health policies.

It was also possible that P.1 became common because it could re-infect people. Usually, coronavirus reinfections are rare as the antibodies produced by the body after infection are effective for months. However, it was possible that P.1 had mutations that made it difficult for these antibodies to attach to it, allowing them to slip into cells and cause new infections.

The researchers tested these possibilities by tracking P.1 from its earliest samples in December. At the beginning of January it was 87 percent of the samples. By February it had completely taken over.

The researchers combined the data from genomes, antibodies and medical records in Manaus and came to the conclusion that P.1 conquered the city thanks to biology rather than luck: its mutations contributed to its spread. Like B.1.1.7, it can infect more people on average than other variants. They estimate that it is between 1.4 and 2.2 times more transmissible than other coronavirus lineages.

But it also gets a benefit from mutations that allow antibodies from other coronaviruses to escape. They estimate that out of 100 people who were infected in Manaus last year, between 25 and 61 were re-infected by P.1.

The researchers found support for this conclusion in an experiment in which they mixed P.1 virus with antibodies from Brazilians who had Covid-19 last year. They found that the effectiveness of their antibodies against P.1 decreased six-fold compared to other coronaviruses. This decline could mean that at least some people are susceptible to new infections from P.1.

“There seems to be a growing body of evidence to suggest that most of the second wave-related cases are actually some kind of reinfection,” said Dr. Faria.

Dr. Faria and other researchers are now looking across Brazil to observe the spread of P.1. Dr. Ester Sabino, an infectious disease expert at the University of São Paulo Faculty of Medicine, said one of the new outbreaks has occurred in Araraquara, a Brazilian city of 223,000 that did not have high rates of Covid-19 before P.1 arrived.

If the people of Araraquara did not have high antibody levels prior to P.1’s arrival, it suggests that the variant may have spread to locations without Manaus’ extreme history. “This could happen in any other place,” she said.

Michael Worobey, a virologist at the University of Arizona who was not involved in the research, said it was time to pay attention to P.1 in the US. He expected it to become more common in the United States, although it would have to compete with B.1.1.7, which could soon become the predominant variant in much of the nation.

“At least it will be one of the competitors,” said Dr. Worobey.

In their experiments, Dr. Faria and his colleagues also received antibodies from eight people who received CoronaVac, a Brazilian-made vaccine that was used in Brazil. They found that the antibodies produced by the vaccine were less effective at stopping the P.1 variant than other types.

Dr. Faria warned that these results, taken from cells in test tubes, don’t necessarily mean vaccines are less effective at protecting real people from P.1. Vaccines can very well provide strong protection against P.1, even if the antibodies they produce are not quite as effective. And even if the variant manages to infect vaccinated people, they will most likely remain protected from a severe attack of Covid-19.

For Dr. Sabino is the ultimate meaning of P.1 the threat that variants pose if they can appear anywhere in the world.

“It’s just a matter of time and chance,” she said.

Categories
Business

UK search thriller particular person contaminated with Brazil Covid variant

A worker who distributes vaccination cards as members of the public will be vaccinated at a drive-through vaccine center in Hyde near Manchester, UK on Friday January 8, 2021.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

UK health officials are keen to track down one in six people infected with a contagious variant of the coronavirus that was originally identified in Brazil.

Up to six cases of the new strain – named P.1 and classified as a “variant of concern” by global health experts – have been identified in the UK, three in Scotland and three in England.

What worries officials, however, is that one of the three cases found in England has not been traced. The government issued a statement on Sunday noting that two of the cases in England came from a South Gloucestershire household and had traveled to Brazil in the past.

The cases in South Gloucestershire, southeast England, were quickly followed up by a team from Public Health England and their contacts were identified and retested, the government said. All passengers on the same flight – Swiss Air flight LX318 from Sao Paulo via Zurich to London Heathrow on February 10 – were also followed by officials.

As a precautionary measure, health officials are stepping up testing of asymptomatic cases in the South Gloucestershire area and increasing sequencing of positive samples from the area.

The mysterious case

However, further research is ongoing into a separate third case of the variant identified in England. The health authorities are calling on anyone who did not receive the result of a Covid test carried out on February 12 or 13 to report.

“The person did not fill out their test registration card, so no follow-up details are available,” the government stated.

“We therefore ask anyone who took a test on February 12th or 13th and has not yet received the result or has an incomplete test registration card to call 119 in England or 0300 303 2713 in Scotland for assistance as soon as possible receive.”

UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock will hold a meeting later Monday to inform UK lawmakers of all parties of the variant, the BBC reported.

Why are officials concerned?

Health officials are concerned because the variant first identified in Brazil is believed to be a more contagious strain of the coronavirus and could cause more severe infections. There are also concerns that it could make coronavirus vaccines less effective. However, this is not confirmed and research is being carried out to see if it is.

While scientists are doing this research, vaccine manufacturers are developing booster vaccinations for target variants.

The UK is already grappling with the spread of a far more contagious variant, which was responsible for an increase in cases over the winter. The strain has since become dominant in the country and has spread worldwide.

The latest weekly report from the World Health Organization said 101 countries have now reported cases of the variant first identified in the UK.

Regarding the strain found in Brazil, it said 29 countries have reported cases so far. This P.1 variant was first identified in four travelers from Brazil to Japan in January during a routine screening at Haneda Airport outside Tokyo.

The strain has been classified as “Concerning” because it has some crucial mutations with the variant first identified in South Africa. According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the P.1 variant has a total of 17 unique mutations and was first detected in the US at the end of January.

regulate

When the first cases of this variant were discovered in the UK, people traveling from abroad had to self-isolate at home for 10 days.

However, that changed on February 15th and now travelers to the UK must be quarantined in hotels for 10 days at their own expense. In mid-January, Great Britain banned travelers from various South American countries from entering the country unless they had a right of residence.

The move was an attempt to prevent the spread of infectious variants and potentially undermine the previously successful introduction of the coronavirus vaccine in the country. The UK reached another milestone on Sunday after vaccinating 20 million people with a first dose of a Covid vaccine.

Dr. Susan Hopkins, PHE’s Strategic Response Director for Covid-19 and NHS Test and Trace Medical Advisor, said the new cases in the UK were identified thanks to the country’s advanced sequencing capabilities, “which means we are finding more variants and mutations than many other countries.” and are therefore able to act quickly. “

“The most important thing is that whatever the variant, Covid-19 spreads the same way. That means the measures taken to contain the spread won’t change,” she said, advocating good personal hygiene and leaving only the house for essential reasons.

Scotland’s Falls

The three cases identified in Scotland were found in people returning to Aberdeen from Brazil via Paris and London. These cases are not related to the three cases in England.

As required at the time, the individuals entered self-isolation upon their return to Scotland and subsequently tested positive for coronavirus. The people then self-isolate for the required 10-day period, the Scottish Government said in a statement.

Due to possible concerns about this variant, other passengers on the flight from London to Aberdeen were contacted, the Scottish government found.

Categories
Health

You’re Contaminated With the Coronavirus. However How Contaminated?

With Covid-19 patients flocking to hospitals across the country, doctors face an impossible question. Which patients in the emergency room are more likely to get worse quickly and which are most likely to fight the virus and recover?

As it turns out, there may be a way to differentiate these two groups, although it’s not yet widely used. Dozens of research published in the past few months found that people with bodies full of coronaviruses were more likely to get seriously ill and die more often, compared to people who carried much fewer viruses and were more likely to be relatively unharmed.

The results suggest that knowing what is known as viral load – the amount of virus in the body – could help doctors predict a patient’s course and more accurately distinguish those who may only need an oxygen check once a day from those who need it monitored, said Dr. Daniel Griffin, an infectious disease doctor at Columbia University in New York.

Tracking viral load “can actually help us stratify risk,” said Dr. Griffin. The idea is not new: viral load management has long been the foundation of caring for people living with HIV and stopping the transmission of this virus.

Little effort has been made to track viral loads in Covid-19 patients. However, earlier this month the Food and Drug Administration announced that clinical laboratories may report not only whether a person was infected with the coronavirus, but also how much virus was transmitted in their body.

This is not a change in policy – laboratories could have reported this information all along, according to two senior FDA officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity for not having the authority to speak publicly on the matter.

Still, the news came as a welcome surprise to some of the experts who have spent months pushing laboratories to record this information.

“This is a very important step by the FDA,” said Dr. Michael Mina, epidemiologist at Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health. “I think it’s a step in the right direction to make the most of one of the little pieces of data we have for a lot of positive people.”

The FDA change followed a similar move by the Florida Department of Health to require all laboratories to report this information.

Omitting viral load from test results was a missed opportunity not only to optimize strained clinical resources but also to better understand Covid-19, experts say. For example, an analysis of viral load shortly after exposure could reveal whether people who die of Covid-19 are more likely to have high viral loads at the onset of their illness.

And a study published in June showed that the viral load decreased as the immune response increased, “just as you would expect from an old virus,” said Dr. Alexander Greninger, a virologist at the University of Washington in Seattle. who directed the study.

An increase in the average viral load across communities could indicate an increasing epidemic. “We can get an idea of ​​whether the epidemic is growing or decreasing without relying on the number of cases,” said James Hay, postdoctoral fellow in Dr. Mina’s laboratory.

Fortunately, viral load data – or at least a rough approximation of it – is readily available to feed into the results of the PCR tests that most laboratories use to diagnose coronavirus infection.

A PCR test is performed in “cycles”, doubling the amount of viral genetic material originally taken from the patient sample. The higher the initial viral load, the fewer cycles the test takes to find genetic material and generate a signal.

A positive result at a low cycle threshold or Ct implies a high viral load on the patient. If the test is positive after completing many cycles, the patient is likely to have a lower viral load.

Researchers at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York recorded the viral load of more than 3,000 hospitalized Covid-19 patients on the day they were admitted. They found that 40 percent of patients with high viral loads – whose tests were positive at a Ct of 25 or less – died in the hospital, compared with 15 percent of those who tested positive at higher Ct and presumably lower viral loads.

In another study, the Nevada Department of Health found an average Ct of 23.4 in people who died from Covid-19 compared to 27.5 in people who survived their diseases. People who were asymptomatic had a mean of 29.6, suggesting they carried much fewer viruses than the other two groups.

These numbers seem to vary very little, but they represent millions of virus particles. “These are not subtle differences,” said Dr. Greninger. A study from his lab showed that patients with a Ct less than 22 were more than four times as likely to die within 30 days as compared to those with a lower viral load.

However, using Ct values ​​to estimate viral load is a difficult practice. Viral load measurements for HIV are highly accurate because they are based on blood samples. Tests for the coronavirus rely on wiping your nose or throat – a process that is subject to user error and the results of which are less consistent.

The amount of coronavirus in the body changes drastically as the infection progresses. The levels go from undetectable to positive test results in just a few hours, and the viral load continues to rise until the immune response sets in.

Then the viral load decreases rapidly. However, viral fragments can remain in the body and produce positive test results long after the patient is no longer infectious and the disease has resolved.

Given this variability, capturing viral load at a given point in time may not make sense if there is no more information about the progression of the disease, said Dr. Celine Gounder, Infectious Disease Specialist at Bellevue Hospital Center and a member of the Coronavirus Inbound Management Advisory Group.

“When do you measure the viral load on this curve?” Asked Dr. Gounder.

The exact relationship between a Ct value and the corresponding viral load can vary between tests. Instead of validating this quantitative relationship for each machine, the FDA authorized the tests to provide diagnoses based on a limit value for the cycle threshold.

Most manufacturers conservatively set the thresholds for diagnosing their machine between 35 and 40. These values ​​generally correspond to an extremely low viral load. However, the exact threshold for a positive result or for a certain Ct as an indication of infectivity depends on the instrument used.

“So I’m very concerned about many of these Ct-based ratings,” said Susan Butler-Wu, director of clinical microbiology at the University of Southern California.

“Of course it is a value that can be useful in certain clinical circumstances,” said Dr. Butler-Wu, “but the idea that you can have a unicorn Ct that correlates perfectly with an infectious or non-infectious condition makes me very nervous.”

Other experts recognized these limitations, but said that the benefits of collecting Ct values ​​outweighed the concerns.

“All of these are valid points when looking at the test results of an individual patient, but they don’t change the fact that, on average, looking at the results of the admission tests of these Ct values, actually identifies patients at high risk of decompensation will and die, “said Dr. Michael Satlin, an infectious disease physician and lead researcher on the Weill Cornell Study.

Dr. Satlin said adjusting his team’s results for duration of symptoms and various other variables did not change the high risk of death in high viral load patients. “Regardless of how you try to statistically adjust, that association is extremely strong and won’t go away,” he said.

At the population level, too, Ct values ​​can be valuable during a pandemic, said Dr. Hay. High viral loads in a large group of patients may indicate recent exposure to the virus, suggesting an incipient increase in community transmission.

“This could be a great monitoring tool for less well-equipped facilities that need to understand the course of the epidemic but are unable to conduct regular, random tests,” said Dr. Hay.

Overall, information on the viral load is too valuable to be ignored or discarded without analysis.

“One of the things that has been difficult with this pandemic is that everyone wants to do evidence-based medicine and do it at the right pace,” said Dr. Greninger. “But we should also expect certain things to be true, like that more viruses are usually not good.”