Categories
Politics

Biden to Host Independence Day Occasion Celebrating Progress on the Pandemic

While the White House once set July 4th as the date when at least 70 percent of adults would be at least partially vaccinated, officials admitted last month that they would almost certainly miss that target as vaccination rates peaked at April has fallen.

Updated

July 4, 2021, 3:27 p.m. ET

And while 20 states, Washington, DC, and two territories passed the 70 percent mark last week, the country’s overall progress has slowed significantly, with now an average of about a million doses per week. According to the New York Times, about 67 percent of adults had received at least one injection on Sunday.

The rapid spread of the highly contagious Delta variant has also raised concerns among public health officials, who fear that new outbreaks could occur in parts of the country where vaccination rates have remained comparatively low, and that the variant could mutate to that extent vaccinated, Americans remain vulnerable.

While the pageantry at the White House will be a demonstration of normality that seemed far from likely at the start of Mr Biden’s tenure, the occasion will be marked by a reluctance seldom seen under the previous administration.

Even as new cases soared to a summer high last year, President Donald J. Trump hosted 35-minute fireworks and military flyovers on the National Mall, against the will of Washington Mayor Muriel E. Bowser, who urged people to do so do not participate. This year’s fireworks show will be half as long, and Ms. Bowser has welcomed guests to town, encouraged by advances on vaccines.

Under Mr Trump, the White House held other large gatherings well before vaccines were approved, including two to celebrate the nomination and endorsement of Judge Amy Coney Barrett, at which he and several other attendees were believed to have been exposed and infected.

For Mr Biden, this year’s celebrations seem choreographed to signal that Americans can enjoy some measure of normalcy when they get together, even as his own public health officials continue to emphasize the importance of maintaining momentum with vaccines to have.

Categories
Health

Is Biden Declaring ‘Independence From the Coronavirus’ Too Quickly?

“There is so much toxic politics around Covid that it’s constraining sensible action,” he said. “Obviously it makes sense to require proof of vaccination in various settings, but that has become a political lightning rod.”

Dr. Frieden and other experts said they feared that if the Delta variant continues to circulate, it will mutate in a way that leaves even the vaccinated vulnerable. That already seems to be happening elsewhere in the world; even countries like South Korea and Israel, where the virus seemed to be in check, have new clusters of disease.

“Compared to many other countries, we are in a much more secure situation,” said Dr. Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University. But, she added, “I really do worry that as America enjoys its freedoms, we forget about the rest of the world, and that could come back to bite us.”

When Mr. Biden announced his July 4 vaccination goal in early May, he said meeting it would demonstrate that the United States had taken “a serious step toward a return to normal.” For many people, that seems to be the case. The president said then that Americans would be able to gather in backyards for small Independence Day barbecues; his gathering of 1,000 guests is partly aimed at showing the country that his administration has exceeded expectations even if vaccinations have stalled.

While Mr. Biden has repeatedly spoken of “independence from the virus,” Dr. Arthur L. Caplan, the director of NYU Langone Medical Center’s medical ethics division, said the president should be careful about the language he uses.

“Before I went out and had my fireworks and sipped piña coladas on the White House veranda, I would say, ‘I’ve got to make clear, as president, we have major challenges unresolved,’” Dr. Caplan said. “I would say, ‘We’re doing well at halftime.’”

Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the president’s top medical adviser for the pandemic, said there was nothing contradictory about the administration’s message.

Categories
Politics

U.S. Vitality Independence Threatened by Hackers and Local weather Change

HOUSTON – When OPEC banned oil exports to the United States in 1973 and created long gasoline lines, President Richard Nixon promised an effort that would combine the spirit of the Apollo program and the determination of the Manhattan Project.

“By the end of this decade we will have developed the potential to meet our own energy needs without being dependent on foreign energy sources,” he said in a televised address.

Its timing was wrong – it took more than 40 years – but the country has come pretty close to energy independence in recent years thanks to an increase in domestic shale oil and natural gas production and the use of solar and wind power.

However, this independence is fragile. Cars lined up at gas stations in much of the Southeast last week after the colonial pipeline was paralyzed by a cyber attack by a criminal group seeking a ransom. The power grid is also under greater strain from climate change. Last year, a heat wave in California and a freezing state in Texas forced rolling blackouts as demand for electricity exceeded supply.

“Eight presidents wanted energy independence, and now that we have achieved that, we are more resilient to the global oil market,” said Daniel Yergin, energy historian and author of The New Map: Energy, Climate and the Clash of Nations. ”” However, resilience is still a question of how the system works under stress, whether it’s pipelines or electricity. “

The colonial pipeline disruption had nothing to do with turbulence in the Middle East or insufficient American power generation. Nonetheless, panic buying, which had seldom been seen for decades, led to bottlenecks, and pump prices rose by up to 20 cents per gallon for regular gas in a few days, according to the AAA.

Mr. Yergin said drivers who lined up at pumps to fill gas cans and even plastic bags made the situation worse. The impulse to hoard stems from the oil shocks of the 1970s and seemed to touch a chord in the national psyche.

“People remembered gas pipes even though they weren’t born yet,” said Yergin.

Colonial Pipeline, a privately held company, resumed full operations over the weekend, but it will be a few more days before many gas stations are refilled.

Energy companies are under increasing pressure from governments and investors to strengthen their defenses against cyberattacks, but these and other vulnerabilities will not be easy to overcome, especially after years of underinvestment.

In the case of networks in California and Texas, there are few simple solutions to the weaknesses exposed by heat waves and freezing temperatures that are costing these states billions of dollars and leaving many dead and thousands homeless. That the country’s two most populous states have been located low suggests that power plants and electrical lines are unprepared for the extreme weather events that climatologists say will happen in the coming years due to the build-up of gases that warm the planet, will be more common in the atmosphere.

Nationwide, weather-related power outages have risen by two thirds since 2000, according to the Ministry of Energy.

“Our traditional strategies for generating and delivering energy are threatened by the climate and cyber terrorists,” said Mark Brownstein, senior vice president, Environmental Defense Fund. “On the way to a cleaner and more sustainable energy future, we must also move towards a future that is fundamentally more resilient.”

Upgrading the energy system will not be easy. Dozens of competing companies operating a vast network of oil and gas wells, pumping stations, transmission lines, and power plants need to be persuaded to make their operations more resilient to weather and criminal attack. Significant resources must be made available by companies, government agencies and research to stay one step ahead of cybercriminals. President Biden’s $ 2 trillion infrastructure plan provides $ 100 billion for the transmission network.

The pursuit of energy independence has never been in a straight line, and there have been many unfortunate twists and turns. Reliance on Middle Eastern oil has been a major consideration in military action and diplomatic strategy, including alliances with countries like Saudi Arabia with disruptive human rights records. Half a century ago, the country switched from burning fuel oil to becoming more dependent on coal, which contributed to climate change.

The search for energy independence also led to innovations. Fracking – the hydraulic fracturing of shale oil and natural gas – not only reduced energy imports, but also made the United States a major exporter. Suddenly, oil and gas were no longer a national security hole, but a tool for advancing American interests.

For the past 15 years, US oil and gas production has kept energy prices down at home and abroad and strengthened the global economy. By exporting energy, Washington has been able to compete with Russian gas supplies to Europe, help allies like Japan, who import a lot of energy, and block Iranian and Venezuelan oil supplies.

In a twist, the shale boom also made some parts of the United States more vulnerable. In recent years, half a dozen refineries along the east coast have closed because they could not compete with more advanced refineries on the Gulf Coast that benefited from cheap and abundant oil and gas in Texas. The rivers on the Colonial Pipeline, which connects the Gulf Refineries to New Jersey, grew steadily, supplying nearly half of the region’s fuel needs.

When hurricanes hit and Gulf refineries shut down, gasoline and diesel prices tend to rise on the east coast. Usually this is not a huge problem as companies store a lot of fuel near where it is used and trucks and barges can usually make the difference. This time, however, uncertainty about how long it would take to restore supplies made the colonial pipeline shutdown much more disruptive.

The ransomware attack was the work of DarkSide, an extortionate ring that was responsible for numerous attacks on companies in several countries. But it is hardly the only group that infiltrates computer systems in order to extort money. Others have names like REvil, Maze, and LockBit.

“Technology is moving so fast that you fix a potential vulnerability or two or twenty in your computer systems and the hackers find another way to get in.” said Drue Pearce, a former assistant administrator for the Federal Pipeline Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

The criminal groups pose a threat to industries beyond energy. However, experts say that energy is of particular concern as it is essential for a functioning economy. The threat is no less complex than reducing the United States’ dependence on foreign oil, said Bill Richardson, a former energy secretary.

“This is a new threat that we are not prepared for,” he said.

Categories
World News

Of Brexit and Boris: What’s Driving the Name for Scottish Independence

The millions of votes counted across Scotland on Saturday could be some of the most momentous of recent times, and not because of their impact on things like health, education and fisheries. The biggest problem the country faced and was really at stake was nowhere on the ballot and that is the future of its 314 year old union with England.

While the final votes were still being counted in Saturday’s general election, it seemed almost certain that the Scottish Independent National Party would miss the majority it had hoped would provide an irresistible impetus for a new referendum to break off the elections would give United Kingdom. But it will keep power in Edinburgh, probably with the support of the Scottish Greens, to guarantee that the issue will continue to dominate Scottish politics, as it has for the past few years.

Much. A second referendum on independence after a referendum in 2014 could break the UK. If Scotland were to become independent, Britain would lose eight percent of its population, a third of its land mass and a considerable amount of international prestige.

Some say the loss of Scotland would be the greatest blow to a British Prime Minister since Lord North lost the colonies in America in the 18th century. Understandably, current Prime Minister Boris Johnson is not a fan of this idea.

In the 2014 referendum, the Scots rejected independence with a decisive lead of 55 to 45 percent. That should solve the problem for a generation, but two years later came the Brexit vote and that changed the landscape radically.

While England voted to leave the European Union, 62 percent of Scottish voters wanted to stay. With only about a tenth the population of England, Scotland outnumbered and its preference was simply ignored. Resentment about this has helped revive the urge for what is commonly known as “Indyref2”.

Then there is the person of Mr. Johnson. Already largely unpopular in Scotland, he did nothing to inspire himself, steadfastly advocating a hardline version of Brexit and finally “finishing it”, as he liked to say when 2021 arrived.

The resulting disruption to exporters, and particularly to the important Scottish fish and shellfish industry, which relied heavily on smooth trade with the European Union, has further angered Scots.

The main proponent is the Scottish National Party, led by Nicola Sturgeon, Scotland’s first minister. Her party has led the Scottish Government for 14 years and she has earned praise for her steadfast handling of the coronavirus pandemic, especially when compared to Mr. Johnson’s early appearances.

There are smaller parties who also want another vote, such as the Greens, who are close to the SNP. Another party for independence, Alba, is led by Alex Salmond, who is not an ally of Ms. Sturgeon – at least not anymore. As a former first minister, Mr. Salmond was once Ms. Sturgeon’s mentor, but the two have recently been embroiled in a bitter feud and his campaign has stalled.

The Scottish Parliament, newly established in 1999, was supposed to satisfy the demand for Scottish independence, but it did not work out that way. The independent SNP has become the dominant force and in 2011 won a rare overall majority in a parliament in which the voting system is designed to avoid the rule of one party. Following that outcome, Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron reluctantly approved the 2014 independence referendum.

Ms. Sturgeon had hoped that an overwhelming victory for the independence parties in these elections would give her the moral authority to call for another referendum. They stayed behind, but Mrs Sturgeon will keep pressure on a referendum claiming that she has a mandate along with the vote for the Greens.

They show a divided Scotland that is split in the middle over independence. This is in line with the results of opinion polls, which showed last year that a majority are in favor of independence, only to fall behind marginally in recent months. The Scottish Conservatives, the opposition Labor Party and the Liberal Democrats are all against independence.

The issue is so dominant that some anti-independence voters appear to have switched loyalty from their normal parties to support the party most likely to defeat the SNP in their area. Ms. Sturgeon is on track to remain first minister, which is an impressive achievement, but with her path to an overall majority likely cut off, her moral case for a second referendum has been weakened.

For a second independence referendum to be legal would almost certainly require London’s approval, and Mr Johnson has repeatedly said no. This is a big problem for Mrs Sturgeon because she wants the result of a second referendum to be accepted internationally and for Scotland to be allowed to return to the European Union.

Far from it. Even if she has to rely on the Greens, Ms. Sturgeon will likely have enough votes to get indyref2 legislation through the Scottish Parliament and then ask Mr. Johnson or his allies to stop them in court.

That could cause a constitutional crisis. After all, Scotland’s union with England was voluntary in 1707, which made it difficult for London to say no to another referendum forever. And Mrs Sturgeon can calculate that support for independence will only increase when the Scots see popular will being blocked by a government in England.