Tag: Immigration

Categories
Politics

Biden’s Immigration Insurance policies Face Contemporary Judicial Setbacks

Biden’s Immigration Policies Face Fresh Judicial Setbacks

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department on Friday called on the Supreme Court to halt a judge’s order to restart a Trump-era program that was causing migrants crossing the southern border to seek asylum to await their cases in Mexico , often in life-threatening situations.

The move came in response to one of two court rulings this week that marked a backlash in President Biden’s efforts to reverse his predecessor’s tough immigration policies.

On Thursday, a federal appeals court in Texas dismissed an attempt by the Biden administration to halt a court order reinstating the controversial migrant protection protocols program, also known as “Remain in Mexico” asylum policy, underway during the Trump administration. The order should take effect on Saturday.

And in a separate case, a federal judge in Texas temporarily blocked the Biden administration’s short-term strategy of limiting arrests of undocumented immigrants by prioritizing those who most threatened national and public security. A Justice Department spokeswoman said the agency is reviewing Judge Drew B. Tipton’s 160-page verdict of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas and lawyers are considering next steps.

Taken together, the trials threaten two of the Biden government’s earliest efforts to reshape the country’s immigration system. Another blow came in July when a federal judge ruled that an Obama-era program protecting hundreds of thousands of undocumented young adults from deportation was illegal.

The judges’ decisions and the administration’s appeal to the Supreme Court on Friday, emphasized the role of the courts as the primary venue for shaping polarizing immigration policy, one legal challenge after another – a strategy that immigration advocates have refined during the Trump administration.

“Those who oppose the Biden government’s immigration agenda take every opportunity to ask political questions and have them answered in favorable courts,” said Tom K. Wong, director of the US Immigration Policy Center at the University of California, San Diego said.

The order for the Biden administration to restore Trump policies that forced asylum seekers to wait in Mexico while their cases were being handled in the United States came from Judge Matthew J. Kacsmaryk of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

He and Judge Tipton were both appointed by President Donald J. Trump. Of the three judges on the Fifth District Court of Appeal who on Thursday denied the government’s motion to stop the “stay in Mexico” ruling, two were appointed by Trump; the third was appointed by President George W. Bush.

On appeal to the Supreme Court, government attorneys said the reintroduction of asylum policy on Saturday was “almost impossible” and would cause “irreparable harm”. Critics said it would place asylum seekers in dangerous gathering environments at a time when the highly contagious Delta variant fueled a surge in coronavirus cases.

It was initially unclear what exactly the order would set in motion on Saturday or whether Mexico would allow the program to resume.

The program was also litigated during the Trump administration.

“You will likely see opponents of the Biden administration’s future policies using the courts to hold back progress, which only adds to the importance of Congressional action,” Wong said.

The most recent example is efforts to prevent the administration from prioritizing undocumented immigrants to be arrested.

In February, the Biden administration issued its preliminary arrest priorities for immigration and customs enforcement, a marked departure from the Trump administration’s policy of arresting undocumented immigrants for any immigration violations. The Biden team ordered ICE officials to give priority to the arrest of undocumented persons who pose a risk to national and public security, as well as those who recently illegally crossed the border. The Obama administration has similar enforcement priorities.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton celebrated the injunction on the priorities of Mr. Biden’s arrest, calling it “another Texas win over Biden.”

Texas is a party in both cases and this year has borne the brunt of the unusually high number of illegal border crossings, with many migrant families and children from Central America arriving in the state’s Rio Grande Valley and overwhelming border officials. The state has taken several measures to challenge the immigration policies of the Biden government; Earlier this summer, Republican Governor Greg Abbott ordered state law enforcement agencies to arrest migrants for trespassing in an attempt to tackle illegal immigration – because, he said, the Biden administration did not.

Alejandro N. Mayorkas, the Secretary of Homeland Security, has been working to outline permanent arrest priorities for ICE that would replace the tentative ones currently under attack. It was not immediately clear whether the judge’s ruling would apply to the administration’s final arrest priorities.

If the Biden government cannot continue with its immigration arrest strategy, the postponement will likely continue to weigh on an immigration detention system that is already near full. ICE arrests have so far decreased by more than half this year compared to the same period in 2020, according to immigration statistics, in part due to pandemic-related rules to limit the number of people in meeting places and temporary arrest priorities.

Mr. Wong said that even if Republicans were to challenge arrest priorities, it would not change the reality that there was not enough room.

“And so the policy of ‘enforcement en masse’ does not take into account finite resources,” he said, “including limited detention capacities.”

The government is also waiting for a judge to rule on a lawsuit that would prevent them from continuing a public health rule that the Trump administration put in place at the start of the pandemic to help many asylum-seeking families arriving at the border to refuse. Immigration advocates filed the lawsuit last year, when Vice President Kamala Harris, then a Senator from California and a presidential candidate, argued against the rule.

The plaintiffs’ attorneys hoped to reach an agreement with the Biden administration. But discussions collapsed last month when the White House decided not to lift the health rule anytime soon due to the overwhelming number of migrants arriving at the southern border and the risk of further Covid-19 infections.

If the courts ultimately order the administration to repeal the public health rule, it will expand the federal government’s enforcement capabilities even further.

Charlie Savage contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Biden Backs Democrats Advancing Immigration Modifications Unilaterally

Biden Backs Democrats Advancing Immigration Changes Unilaterally

President Biden said on Thursday night that he supported a plan championed by congressional Democrats to use a legislative process intended for budget-related measures to bypass Republican opposition and legalize millions of undocumented immigrants.

Senator Chuck Schumer, Democrat of New York and the majority leader, has been quietly exploring whether it would be possible to attach a broad revision of immigration laws to a $3.5 trillion budget plan that Democrats intend to pass unilaterally through a fast-track process known as budget reconciliation.

Mr. Biden said on Thursday night that White House staff were “putting out a message right now” that “we should include in the reconciliation bill the immigration proposal.”

That means throwing the White House’s weight behind using the budget maneuver to provide a pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented immigrants, should bipartisan talks on providing a pathway to citizenship fall apart.

Mr. Biden met on Thursday with Democratic lawmakers to discuss a program known as Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, that protects some immigrants, known as Dreamers, from deportation. Advocates have pushed for Democrats to provide expedited citizenship to Dreamers, amid legal challenges to DACA.

“It went very well,” Mr. Biden said of the meeting, which included members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus and leadership of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees.

The president spoke to reporters en route to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center with his wife, Jill Biden, who was to undergo a medical procedure on her foot.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi last month endorsed the idea of using reconciliation to push through an immigration measure, citing the “budget impacts of immigration in our country.”

Republicans, however, have already called it an abuse of the reconciliation process and raised questions about whether the parliamentarian would even allow immigration legislation to advance under a procedure that is intended to deal exclusively with budget rules.

Categories
Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris unveils technique to handle unlawful immigration

Vice President Kamala Harris unveils strategy to address illegal immigration

U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris speaks in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building during the National Bar Association’s virtual meeting in Washington, DC, the United States, on Tuesday, July 27, 2021.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Vice President Kamala Harris on Thursday released a comprehensive strategy to address the root causes of migration amid the recent surge in illegal border crossings between the US and Mexico.

The strategy states that the pandemic and “extreme weather conditions” have exacerbated the causes of migration, including corruption, violence, human trafficking and poverty.

The announcement comes as the government faces a crisis on the southern border with migrant detentions reaching a 20-year high in recent months.

More than 1.1 million arrests were recorded in the first six months of this fiscal year, according to US Customs and Border Protection. And in June alone, there was a record high of almost 190,000 arrests.

While the Biden government has sent millions of doses of vaccine and hurricane aid to Central America, Harris noted that such short-term aid “is not enough to provide long-term relief”.

Instead, the Vice President’s strategy promises more sustained efforts to address the motives for migration, including a realignment of engagement in Central America.

“In Central America, the root causes of migration run deep – and migration from the region has a direct impact on the United States,” Harris wrote in a cover letter about the plan. “Because of this, our nation must work consistently with the region to address the needs that are causing people to leave Central America and come to our border.”

Earlier this year, President Joe Biden appointed Harris to lead the government’s diplomatic efforts to address the root causes of migration from El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras, and she visited the US-Mexico border in June as part of that effort.

The strategy is the Vice President’s latest move to address these root causes and is a core part of the Biden government’s broader plan, released Tuesday, to establish a “fair, orderly and humane immigration system.”

The plan is divided into five pillars but does not provide a detailed timetable or policy actions to be taken. The pillars include combating economic insecurity and inequality, combating democratic corruption and promoting respect for human rights.

The plan also addresses gang violence and crime, and the fight against sexual and gender-based violence.

Harris noted that the United Nations and the governments of Mexico, Japan and South Korea have pledged to join efforts to combat the motives for migrating from Central America.

“The United States cannot do this job on its own,” Harris wrote in the cover letter. “Our strategy is far-reaching – and focuses on our partnerships with other governments, international institutions, companies, foundations and civil society.”

On Tuesday, the White House also published a “Collaborative Migration Management Strategy” ordered by President Joe Biden in February. It outlines how the US will work with other countries to “manage safe, orderly and humane migration” in North and Central America.

Efforts include expanding employment opportunities and protection in countries where migrants leave, ensuring safe and humane border management, and creating more legal routes for entry into the United States

Dozens of migrants of Central American and Mexican descent are sleeping on the esplanade of the National Institute of Migration near the El Chaparral border crossing, waiting for US authorities to allow them to enter the country to begin their humanitarian asylum process.

Stringer | Image Alliance | Getty Images

Republicans have criticized the Biden administration for its immigration policies, claiming that the withdrawal of several directives enacted under former President Donald Trump encouraged illegal migration to the United States

Democrats and immigration supporters have also put pressure on Biden to ensure humane treatment of migrant children and families at the border and repeal a Trump-era public health ordinance known as Title 42.

The Health Ordinance has allowed border officials to deport migrants without giving them the opportunity to apply for asylum.

On Monday, the Biden government also announced that it would speed up deportations for some migrant families through an “expedited deportation,” which allows immigration authorities to deport a migrant without a hearing from an immigration judge.

The expeditious deportation procedure will apply specifically to family units who are not deported to Mexico under Title 42 and who are not entitled to asylum, according to a statement by the Ministry of Homeland Security.

This decision drew further criticism from supporters of the left.

Categories
Politics

Vice President Kamala Harris visits the U.S.-Mexico border as immigration disaster continues

Vice President Kamala Harris visits the U.S.-Mexico border as immigration crisis continues

Vice President Kamala Harris made her first visit as Vice President to the US-Mexico border on Friday, touring immigration facilities and meeting with young women.

Speaking to reporters after her tour, Harris said the border trip increased the need to address the root causes of the surge in undocumented migrants from Central America.

“The lack of economic opportunity, very often violence, corruption and food insecurity,” said Harris, “including fear of cartels and gang violence.”

“The work we have to do is address the root causes or else we will continue to see the effects of what is happening at the border,” she said. “It will, as we have done, require a comprehensive approach that recognizes every part of it.”

Earlier this year, President Joe Biden appointed Harris to work to address these causes. In June, she visited Guatemala and Mexico, where she delivered a blunt message to potential migrants.

“I want to make it clear to people in the region who are considering making this dangerous hike to the US-Mexico border, don’t come. Don’t come,” Harris said at a press conference in Guatemala on June 7th. “I think if you get to our border, you will be rejected.”

Harris had been criticized by Republicans in recent weeks for not having personally visited the US-Mexico border.

The White House said Harris always plans to make the trip at the right time. However, the June 25 election may have been influenced by former President Donald Trump’s announcement on Tuesday to visit the June 30 border with Texas GOP Governor Greg Abbott.

A day after Trump announced his upcoming trip, the White House said Harris would visit the border on June 25. Harris’ trip took the White House press corps by surprise. Typically, West Wing aides brief a small group of reporters at least a week in advance of the President and Vice President’s travel plans to give news agencies time to organize their coverage.

Harris denied on Friday that Trump’s plans had any impact on her schedule.

“I said I was going to the border in March, so this is not a new plan,” Harris told reporters after landing in Texas. “Coming to the border … means looking at the effects of what we’ve seen in Central America.”

However, the White House said El Paso’s choice to visit was actually influenced by the former president. In his 2019 State of the Union address, Trump claimed his border wall had turned El Paso from a criminal city into a safe city that angered residents.

Biden and Harris have been criticized for pulling back on Trump-era restrictive immigration policies, even though immigrant detentions on the U.S.-Mexico border have hit 20-year highs in recent months.

Immigration remains a hot topic for both sides. Democrats and pro-immigrant activists have urged Biden to further reduce enforcement and ensure humane treatment of migrant children and families who arrive at the border.

White House officials have said for months that Harris’ efforts to curb immigration from Central America are diplomatic-centered and distinct from border security issues.

“The Vice President’s trip to Guatemala and Mexico earlier this year was about the causes, and this border visit is about the effects,” their spokesman, Symone Sanders, told reporters on Thursday. “Both trips will influence the government’s cause strategy.”

– Reuters correspondent Nandita Bose contributed to this report.

Categories
World News

The Democrats’ Immigration Drawback – The New York Instances

The Democrats’ Immigration Problem - The New York Times

For most of the decades the Democratic Party had a fairly clear stance on immigration. It advocated a mix of enforcement (like border security and deportation of undocumented immigrants who have committed serious crimes) and new laws for immigrants (like an increase in legal immigration and a path to citizenship for undocumented people).

In recent years, however, immigration advocates and progressive Democrats have grown dissatisfied with this combination. You have pointed out that Democratic support for tighter border security has not resulted in the bipartisan compromise it should have: Republicans continue to block bills that provide a route to citizenship.

In response, these progressives and activists have pushed the party to change. Bill Clinton ran for re-election on a platform that said, “We cannot tolerate illegal immigration and we must stop it.” Barack Obama once said: “We simply cannot allow people to flood into the United States undetected, without papers and without controls.” Instead, President Biden has emphasized the humane treatment of immigrants regardless of their legal status.

After taking office, Biden began to put this idea into practice. He announced a 100-day suspension of deportations (which a judge has blocked). He allowed more migrants – especially children – to enter the country instead of being detained. And Central American migrants, feeling the US has become more welcoming, are pouring north in the greatest numbers in two decades.

The upswing seems to have surprised the von Biden government, as Doris Meissner from the Institute for Migration Policy, which headed the immigration and naturalization service in the 1990s, told me. The Republicans have overthrown and accused the Democrats of preferring an “open border”.

Some Democrats are also unhappy. Biden’s policy “is an incentive for multitudes of people to come, and the only way to slow it down is to change the policy on our doorstep,” Texas representative Vicente Gonzalez told the Washington Post. Henry Cuellar, another Texas House Democrat, said the government was sending “terrible news.”

All of this is based on the fact that the Democratic Party no longer has a clear immigration policy.

While Donald Trump was president, he smoothed out internal tensions among the Democrats because they could unite against him. Trump used racist language; Democrats hated it. Trump separated families and caged children; Democrats promised to end this policy. Trump said he would build a border wall that Mexico is paying for; Democrats mocked his failure.

However, with Trump out of office, the party faces some tough, unresolved questions, including:

Do Democrats Still Advocate Deporting Anyone? Some activists criticized Obama as a “top deporter”. However, he focused the deportations on only two groups: newcomers and immigrants who had committed serious crimes.

If Democrats prefer more lenient policies than Obama’s, it’s not clear whether they support the deportation of anyone – or whether they believe instead that the humane solution is to allow anyone who can legally or illegally enter the US , to stay. The party’s 2020 platform does not mention any conditions under which a deportation is acceptable. Biden’s attempt to stop the deportations for 100 days underscores the party’s new stance.

Which migrants should be turned away at the border? And what should happen to them next?

There are no easy answers. One option is to prevent people from entering the country (as is currently the case with many adults traveling alone) – but this can lead to miserable conditions on the Mexican side of the border. A second option is to arrest people in the US while their legal cases are being investigated. Child detention is difficult, however, and many Democrats consider immigrant detention to be similar to Trumpism.

A third option is to take in migrants and order them to appear at a future court hearing (as is the case with many children and families). The adults often have to wear anklets. Still, the process can take years and raise other sensitive questions. Many migrants are not good asylum seekers; They come to find work or to be around relatives, which does not necessarily qualify them for legal entry.

Often it is left to the administration to decide who is ready for deportation.

There are possible political solutions to all of these questions. The US could increase legal immigration. It could build more detention facilities in humane conditions. It could do more to improve conditions in Latin America and get Mexico to control its own southern border. The Biden government follows many of these guidelines.

But if Biden and his aides seem less stable on immigration than many other policies, there is a reason: They are less stable.

Congress is unlikely to increase legal immigration many times over. Surveys show that while public opinion favors a route to citizenship for many undocumented immigrants, it also supports strict border security and the enforcement of existing immigration laws.

I’m not even sure if these views should be called conservative. In the past, many progressives supported immigration restrictions to keep wages high in the US. Today, working-class Americans – including many Asian-American, Black, and Latin American voters – tend to prefer more restrictions than progressive Democrats, who are often high-income professionals. This contrast could play a role in the recent Republican gains with minority voters.

“Unfortunately, the way the debate goes too often feels like, ‘Everyone should come and the border should be open,” said Cecilia Muñoz, a longtime immigrant attorney and former Obama adviser. “And that is what makes Americans fearful. “

One of the advantages of the old Democratic approach to immigration was that it was easy to describe: be firm on the border, be generous to people who have lived in the US for years. The new approach also has a lasting idea: be kinder to people who want to enter the country. But the Democrats still haven’t figured out the limits of this idea, which created an early problem for the Biden presidency.

How many immigrants should the US legally accept?

  • More: “There’s nothing wrong with open borders,” wrote Farhad Manjoo of the Times. Shikha Dalmia has argued that more immigration will fuel economic growth, and Matthew Yglesias wrote “One Billion Americans” in a book claiming that more immigration will help the US compete with China.

  • Fewer: “The ongoing argument for reducing immigration,” according to Philip Cafaro, revolves around higher wages. And David Frum of the Atlantic has suggested that less immigration will reduce the political appeal of nativism.

In flower: Spring has arrived in New York. Here come the cornflowers, butterfly milkweed, and black-eyed susans.

Lived life: Dr. Nawal el Saadawi was an Egyptian writer, doctor and advocate for women’s rights in the Arab world who told her own story about female genital mutilation in her memoirs. She died at the age of 89.

Model trains are the newest industry getting a pandemic boost from people looking for new hobbies. Märklin, a 162-year-old German company, is hiring new trainees as sales increase to learn the precise art of making miniature trains. (Take a virtual tour of the factory here.)

“It’s total chaos outside,” said one enthusiast. “But inside, around my little train set, it’s quiet, it’s picturesque.”

Spelling Bee’s pangram on Friday was unpopular. Here is today’s puzzle – or you can play online.

Here’s today’s mini crossword puzzle and a clue: palpitations (five letters).

Categories
Politics

Home passes immigration payments establishing path to citizenship for hundreds of thousands

House passes immigration bills establishing path to citizenship for millions

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) speaks during a press conference on immigration at the U.S. Capitol on March 18, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Win McNamee | Getty Images

Legislators in the House of Representatives on Thursday passed two bills paving the way for the citizenship or legal status of millions of undocumented immigrants, including those illegally brought into the country as children and agricultural workers.

The law was passed largely partisan, with Democrats and Republicans.

The bills are tighter than the comprehensive immigration package launched in February with the assistance of President Joe Biden. Even so, they face a difficult path to the Senate, where 10 Republicans would have to vote with each Democrat to approve them.

A non-partisan immigration deal – a key priority for the Biden government – has been hampered by recent events. Republicans have noted an increase in unaccompanied minors arrested on the US-Mexico border to press for stricter immigration enforcement.

About 4,500 children are in the care of Customs and Border Protection, most of whom are in a facility in Donna, Texas, an administrative officer said Thursday. Under Biden, more unaccompanied children are allowed to enter the United States than under Trump, whose administration was quick to evict minors seeking entry into the country.

In a television interview on ABC Tuesday, Biden said, “I can be very clear, don’t come,” adding that “we’re in the process of settling in, don’t leave your town or town.” “

Continue reading: Apple CEO Tim Cook praises the Dreamer bill and calls on Congress to pass it

The government has asked the Federal Agency for Disaster Management to protect the minors and move them to more humane facilities while refusing to label the situation a “crisis” or an “emergency”. During a call to reporters on Wednesday, an unnamed administration official said the issue was older than the Biden administration and that legislation was needed to address it.

“This is quite a government effort. We are currently managing the situation, but it will take time for the damage caused to be repaired,” the official said. “We also need to work with Congress to pass an immigration law that will give us more sensible laws to implement and enforce.”

The two bills passed on Thursday are the American Dream and Promise Act and the Farm Workforce Modernization Act.

The first would apply largely to those immigrants known as dreamers who are protected under former President Barack Obama’s “Deferred Action for Child Arrivals 2012” program. About 2.5 million people who came to the United States as children are entitled to a path to citizenship under the law, according to the authors.

The bill was passed between 228 and 197, and nine Republicans joined the Democrats in favor of the legislation.

The second bill would provide farm workers illegally in the country with a route to legal status estimated at at least half of the 2.4 million workers in the sector. Some farm workers could get a green card if they pay a fine and stay in the industry for another four to eight years, depending on how long they have already worked on the farm.

The bills aren’t as extensive as Biden’s immigration plan, the US Citizenship Act of 2021, which would have opened up avenues to citizenship for most of the 11 million undocumented immigrants in the United States. Democratic and Republican leaders have said in recent days that such a sweeping proposal has virtually no chance of garnering bipartisan support.

“I see no way to do that,” Senator Dick Durbin, D-Ill., The Majority Whip, told CNN. “I want it. I think we’ll be much more likely to deal with discrete elements.”

Senator Lindsey Graham, RS.C., a Senate immigration leader, said Monday, “It’s going to be really difficult to put together a bipartisan bill on anything that has a legalization component until you stop the flow.”

The White House officially endorsed both bills early Thursday in statements calling on lawmakers to move forward with the citizenship bill.

Subscribe to CNBC Pro for the TV livestream, deep insights and analysis of how to invest during the next president’s term.

Categories
Politics

Lindsey Graham, Dick Durbin unveil newest immigration reform invoice

Lindsey Graham, Dick Durbin unveil latest immigration reform bill

Protesters hold illuminated signs during a rally supporting the DACA or the Dream Act outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC on January 18, 2018.

Zach Gibson | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., And Lindsey Graham, RS.C., unveiled the latest version of the Dream Act Thursday, which is part of a new push to reform immigration.

The proposed legislation, first introduced in 2001, would give some young undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children the opportunity to pursue an avenue of American citizenship.

The reintroduction comes as President Joe Biden begins rolling out his immigration reform agenda, aiming to reverse many of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.

In 2012, President Barack Obama created the Deferred Action on the Arrivals of Children program after the Dream Bill was not passed in Congress on several occasions.

DACA protects young undocumented immigrants who would be affected by the dream law from deportation. Politics does not offer a route to citizenship.

Trump tried to end the DACA during his presidency, but the Supreme Court blocked his administration’s attempt in June. On January 20, Biden signed an ordinance to maintain the DACA.

“It is clear that only laws passed by Congress can give dreamers the chance to earn their way to American citizenship,” Durbin said in a statement Thursday.

The Dream Act would give some young undocumented immigrants legal permanent residence and eventually American citizenship if they meet certain criteria, including completing high school or earning a GED. Higher education, work or military service, and passing background checks.

The 2021 Dream Act is identical to the versions Durbin and Graham introduced in the last two sessions of Congress, the Senators say.

Graham said in a statement Thursday that he would like to pass the Dream Bill as part of a comprehensive immigration package rather than as a standalone bill.

“I believe it will be a starting point for us to find bipartisan breakthroughs that will bring relief to dreamers and also fix a broken immigration system,” said Graham.

In the last 15 years, Congress has not passed a comprehensive immigration law.

According to a survey by the June Pew Research Center, about three-quarters of Americans support the granting of permanent legal status to undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children.

Categories
Politics

Decide Blocks 100-Day Pause on Deportation, a Blow to Biden’s Immigration Agenda

Judge Blocks 100-Day Pause on Deportation, a Blow to Biden's Immigration Agenda

In the first legal challenge to the Biden government’s immigration agenda, a federal judge in Texas temporarily blocked a 100-day deportation break.

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas on Tuesday issued a 14-day statewide injunction requested by the Attorney General to prevent the implementation of the policy enacted by the Department of Homeland Security within hours of President Biden’s inauguration . The order remains in effect until the judge has considered a more comprehensive application for an injunction.

Judge Drew B. Tipton, appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, said in his ruling that the suspension of deportations would violate a provision of the immigration law as well as another law requiring authorities to make a rational statement their political decisions.

Immigration law provides that individuals with final deportation orders must be deported from the United States within 90 days. The court ruled that the 100-day break violated this requirement and that the mandatory language of the immigration law should not be “neutered by the broad discretion of the federal government.”

The court also ruled that the agency’s memorandum violated a separate law that required agencies to provide a logical and rational reason for their policy changes. The judge found that the Department of Homeland Security had violated the Administrative Procedure Act by failing to provide adequate justification for the temporary suspension of deportations.

Immediately after taking office, Mr. Biden began dismantling some of his predecessor’s initiatives to curb both legal and illegal immigration to the United States. The President has issued a number of implementing regulations, including one to lift travel bans for Muslim-majority countries.

The new Washington

Updated

Jan. 26, 2021, 5:10 p.m. ET

Immigration advocates challenged many of Mr Trump’s policies in federal court, and Judge Tipton’s ruling on Tuesday signaled that immigrant hawks may also sue to obstruct Mr Biden’s initiatives.

“The court order shows President Biden’s tough battle trying to lift the previous administration’s immigration restrictions,” said Stephen Yale-Loehr, an immigration attorney and professor at Cornell Law School. “A single judge can stop a federal agency’s efforts to review and re-prioritize its immigration policy.”

Following the decision on Tuesday, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said on Twitter it was a win over the left.

“Texas is the FIRST state in the nation to file a lawsuit against the Biden Admin. AND WE WON, ”wrote Republican Paxton, who is under investigation for bribery and abuse of power charges by former aides at the federal level.

“Within 6 days of Biden’s inauguration, Texas prevented its illegal deportation freeze,” Paxton wrote. “This was a seditious left-wing uprising. And my team and I stopped doing that. “

In a letter to Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, David Pekoske, last week, Mr. Paxton called the plan a “complete waiver of the Department of Homeland Security’s obligation to enforce federal immigration law,” which would make the state of Texas serious and irreparable would harm “and its citizens. “

Thousands of immigrants in detention centers have deportation orders that can be carried out once they have exhausted their remedies. Thousands more inland could be arrested for having pending deportation orders.

The Biden administration said the break should allow time for an internal review. The moratorium would cover most immigrants facing deportation unless they arrived in the United States after November 1, 2020, were suspected of having committed acts of terrorism or espionage, or posed a threat to the national Security.

“We are confident that as the process progresses, it will be clear that this was a reasonable move to order a temporary pause so the agency can carefully review its policies, procedures and enforcement priorities – while focusing more on public threats Security and national security, “a White House spokesman said Tuesday. “President Biden remains determined to take immediate action to reform our immigration system to ensure that American values ​​are preserved while protecting our communities.”