Categories
Health

A Child’s Blood Sodium Ranges Had been Dangerously Excessive. What Was the Trigger?

The couple sat in silence as they drove home from Blank Children’s Hospital in Des Moines. Her 5-month-old appeared to be dwarfed by the baby carrier strapped to the back seat. He was tiny. He hadn’t grown since he was 2 months old. He weighed just 10 pounds – barely three pounds more than when he was born.

The baby was breastfed from birth, but his mother immediately noticed that he struggled with it more than his three older brothers. She tried putting her breast milk in a bottle to see if that would be easier for her baby to handle. When that didn’t help, she tried adding baby food. He often spat; sometimes it seemed as if more was coming out than was going in. His pediatrician prescribed him an acid-reducing medication. It didn’t seem to do much either.

Despite his size, he looked healthy. He was active. He was able to achieve all of his milestones. He could hold his head up. He could turn around. His fontanelle, the soft spot on his head, was flat—as it should be. His pediatrician advised patience, but when the boy still hadn’t gained any weight at his 4-month visit, she sent blood samples to the lab.

In the late afternoon, the parents received a call with the results. The baby had worrisome abnormalities in his blood chemistry. The salt level in his blood was very high, so high that he could trigger a seizure. In fact, it was so high that he could die if not addressed. Parents rushed the little boy to Blank Children’s Hospital.

Samples taken in the hospital’s emergency room quickly confirmed the anomaly. The child’s sodium level was 159, more than 10 points above normal. The high number not only told his doctors that he had too much sodium, but also that he didn’t have enough water in his body, that he was very dehydrated.

Normally, when there is too much sodium in the body, the brain triggers the urge to drink in order to absorb more water. The brain also tells the kidneys to retain as much water as possible.

The brain communicates all of this with a hormone called vasopressin. Problems with vasopressin can cause a condition first described in the 1700s as diabetes insipidus (DI) — a disease that produces copious and watery (rotten) urine.

The combination of the child’s high sodium levels and watery, dilute urine immediately led doctors to suspect he had DI. His high sodium levels should have caused his brain to send a vasopressin message to his kidneys to hold on to as much water as possible. And yet his urine consisted almost entirely of water. Why? Wasn’t the pituitary gland in his brain able to make the hormone? Or was there a problem on the news-receiving side in his kidneys?

No matter where the problem started, there were medications that could help. Doctors give the baby two drugs that are normally used to control high blood pressure and that cause the kidneys to excrete sodium. Almost immediately, the baby’s sodium began to drop. This indicated that the baby had DI. If so, was the problem in the brain, where the hormone is made, or in the kidneys? How the problem was handled depended on where it originated.

An MRI was done to look for signs of a problem in the pituitary gland. It looked normal. The problem, his doctors thought, was probably in his kidneys. They sent samples to look for a genetic reason for his abnormality, but those results would not be available for weeks.

In the meantime, they continued to give the baby the medicines that helped him get rid of the salt. And slowly the levels dropped. After a few days on these drugs, the baby’s chemistry was perfectly normal. His parents were told he should start gaining weight now. But he did not do it. By the day the doctors decided the baby was well enough to go home, it still hadn’t gained an ounce.

Parents were instructed to feed the child every three hours 24/7 to help him get the maximum number of calories. They should contact their pediatrician and see a genetics specialist. Then they were sent home. They had a strong feeling that their baby was not ready to leave the hospital. He was brought in with a diagnosis of failure to thrive and he’s still not doing well. He was in the zero percentile on the growth chart. Zero. They brought this argument to the boy’s doctors. He will gain weight now that his chemistry is normal they were told. Just give him time.

The child’s parents felt that he did not have time, that his life was still in danger. So early the next morning, parents and baby were back in the car. They had talked their way through to an appointment with the genetics specialists at the University of Iowa Stead Family Children’s Hospital in Iowa City, two hours away. When they got there, the parents shared their concerns. Was the baby’s inability to gain weight because of his DI? Or was there something else going on?

The child had been tested for cystic fibrosis at Blank Hospital. The test was inconclusive. Dozens of other medical conditions can affect a baby’s growth. Parents and baby were sent to the lab to have blood drawn to check for other genetic abnormalities and to the cardiology department to make sure his heart was normal.

The geneticist also wanted the baby to be evaluated by a pediatric gastroenterologist. It was clear he was having trouble feeding and seemed to spit out much of what he was able to eat. The geneticist turned to Dr. Eyad Hanna, who saw the child later that day. It was only minutes before the gastroenterologist decided the child was too small to send home. Like the child’s parents, he feared that if the baby couldn’t gain weight in the hospital, he might not be able to make it at home either. The baby was taken into Hanna’s care and fed around the clock to try to help him get back on the growth curve. Hanna also turned to a pediatric kidney specialist, Dr. Pat Brophy, who recommended adding plain water to make up for the water the boy lost with his urine. Doctors usually advise mothers not to give their babies water because breast milk contains enough water. But this clearly wasn’t a normal baby. And because of the reflux and difficulty breastfeeding the baby, Brophy also recommended placing a tube in the baby’s stomach — a gastrostomy, or G-tube — to ensure it could get enough calories, medication, and much-needed extra water.

The baby continued to spit up copious amounts of the milk and water he was given. Usually, this type of spitting goes away as an infant’s esophagus lengthens and stomach enlarges. But this baby would not grow at all without more food. Hanna recommended adding baby food and dry food to the milk. He had her enlarge the hole in the bottle’s nipple so the thickened liquid could flow through easily.

And then they waited. Test results trickled in. He didn’t have cystic fibrosis. His heart was perfectly normal. But even as the negative results began to roll in, the baby’s parents could see that he was doing better just because he was getting the calories and most importantly, the water he needed. Every night he got the equivalent of an 8-ounce glass of water through his G-tube. Every day he was fed every three hours to get a total of 1,300 calories. And slowly he started gaining weight – 30-40 grams per day. He stayed in the hospital for almost two weeks, and by the time he and his parents were able to go home he had gained over a pound. He needed a few more months to get back on the growth curve. Only then did they get the results of the genetic test, which confirmed what they already knew: the baby had DI

This baby is now 7 years old. He’s learning to live with his DI. He continues to take the medications that help him get rid of his sodium. He often has to go to the toilet. And he has to drink lots and lots of water to replace whatever he loses in his urine. He’s not as big as his brothers – not yet and maybe never. But he’s still growing and thriving, and that’s more than enough for his parents.

Lisa Sanders, MD, is a contributing writer for the magazine. Her latest book is Diagnosis: Solving the Most Baffling Medical Mysteries. If you have a solved case you want to share, write to her at Lisa.Sandersmdnyt@gmail.com.

Categories
Health

CDC recommends vacationers with excessive danger of Covid problems keep away from cruises

The Royal Caribbean cruise ship will be seen on the Hudson River in New York City, United States, on August 18, 2021 as the region’s first cruise ship docks back in New York Harbor.

Tayfun Coskun | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Friday that travelers at high risk of serious complications from Covid-19 should avoid cruises regardless of their vaccination status.

The updated guidelines also recommended that travelers who are not fully vaccinated should not cruise.

The new council follows several coronavirus outbreaks reported on board cruise lines, according to the CDC.

While the agency doesn’t introduce the same masking requirements that apply to planes, trains, and other public transportation, it suggested that face-covering be worn for cruise passengers in common areas.

“The virus that causes Covid-19 spreads easily between people in close proximity on board ships, and the likelihood of getting Covid-19 on cruise lines is high,” the CDC said in its updated guidance.

The agency advised all travelers, regardless of their vaccination status, to get tested one to three days before a cruise and three to five days after their return. Anyone taking a cruise should be in quarantine for seven days after returning, even if they tested negative for the virus.

The new policy comes just a week after the Belize Tourism Board announced that 27 people on board a Carnival cruise tested positive for Covid.

During Friday’s extended trading, Carnival Cruises shares fell more than 2%, Norwegian Cruise Line shares fell nearly 3%, and Royal Caribbean Cruises shares fell more than 2%.

After the industry closed at the beginning of the pandemic due to multiple outbreaks on board ships, the CDC has enforced strict guidelines to prevent similar events from occurring.

Of the three cruise lines, Royal Caribbean was the first to return to operations and had few cases on board ships, which was the target, according to CEO and Chairman Richard Fain.

Royal Caribbean and Carnival have allowed some unvaccinated passengers on board ships, but Norwegian has not.

Norwegian even filed a lawsuit against Florida surgeon general to halt a state ban that prevented companies from requiring customers to provide proof of Covid vaccination. The cruise company was granted a temporary stay in enforcement, but Florida has filed an appeal.

Categories
Health

Third Covid vaccine shot excessive precedence

Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, listens during a Senate Fund Subcommittee hearing in Washington, DC, on Jan.

Stefani Reynolds | Swimming pool | Reuters

Federal health officials are working “ASAP” to get a third Covid-19 vaccine approved for Americans with weakened immune systems, said Dr. White House chief physician Anthony Fauci on Thursday.

It is now clear that immunocompromised populations – which include patients with cancer, HIV, or organ transplants – generally fail to generate an adequate immune response after two doses of a Covid vaccine, Fauci said.

“Immunocompromised people are vulnerable,” said Fauci during a Covid briefing at the White House. “It is extremely important for us to give these people their boosters and we are working on it now and we will do this as soon as possible. … It is a very high priority.”

Immunocompromised populations make up only about 2.7% of the adult US population. Still, they account for about 44% of hospitalized breakthrough Covid cases – an infection in a fully vaccinated person, according to data released late last month by an advisory group from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Studies suggest that a third shot might help people whose immune systems don’t respond as well to a first or second dose.

Four small studies cited by the CDC last month showed that 16% to 80% of people with compromised immune systems had no detectable antibodies to Covid after two shots. Among immunocompromised patients who had no detectable antibody response, 33 to 50% developed an antibody response after receiving an additional dose, according to the CDC.

“From the observational data we have made, it now appears that they are generally not giving an adequate response that we believe would be adequately protected,” Fauci said Thursday.

Other countries such as France are already giving third vaccinations to people with cancer or other immune deficiencies. Israel announced last month that it would offer booster syringes to people over the age of 60 as the syringe seems to be becoming less effective in these people.

Some doctors have pushed for the US to allow an extra dose to immunocompromised populations, and many immunocompromised Americans are already finding extra doses of the vaccines, medical experts say.

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who headed the Food and Drug Administration during Donald Trump’s presidency from 2017 to 2019, told CNBC on Monday that he believes the elderly and immunocompromised people will receive booster shots by September or October.

Categories
Politics

FTX, Cryptocurrency Chief, Strikes to Curb Excessive Threat Trades

A popular cryptocurrency exchange announced on Sunday that it was curbing some type of high-risk trading, partly due to the sharp fluctuations in the value of Bitcoin and the. is held responsible Casino-like atmosphere on such platforms worldwide.

Switching the exchange, FTX, would reduce the amount of bets investors can place by lowering the leverage offered from 101 to 20 times. Leverage multiplies the trader’s chance not only of profit, but also of loss.

“We will take the first step here,” said Sam Bankman-Fried, 29, the billionaire and founder of the platform, which operates from Hong Kong, on Twitter on Sunday. “Today we are removing the high leverage from FTX. The maximum permissible value will be 20x. “

The announcement came after the New York Times, in an article posted online on Friday, described the risky trades offered on FTX and other global exchanges such as Binance and BitMEX that accelerated a global crash in May. This month, those bets worth more than $ 20 billion were liquidated on cryptocurrency exchanges around the world.

Bankman-Fried said lowering leverage “is a step in the direction the industry has been headed and has been for a while,” adding, “Although we believe many of the arguments in favor of With high leverage, we don’t miss the mark either, believing it’s an important part of the crypto ecosystem, and in some cases it’s not a healthy part of it. “

Global platforms like FTX allow traders to borrow big when betting on price fluctuations – traders don’t buy and sell cryptocurrencies, but instead predict where the prices of the underlying assets will go. These bets, known as derivatives, mean that the exchange will grant them credit when they raise $ 1,000 so they can wager on the future price of the cryptocurrency worth up to $ 101,000 on FTX. Now, with the new cap, the maximum on this transaction would be $ 20,000.

This type of transaction should not be available to professional investors in the United States, but – at least historically – some of these investors have used workarounds to trade on the sites.

Leverage makes investors much more susceptible to their accounts being liquidated due to an automated margin call if the price of the cryptocurrency goes against their prediction and they do not have enough collateral on their accounts to support their bets.

It happened in May. When cryptocurrency prices began to fall due to market-moving events such as China’s announcement of regulatory action or Tesla’s decision to suspend Bitcoin payments, it prompted exchanges to automatically liquidate the accounts of the most leveraged investors before their collateral were no longer sufficient to cover their positions.

“These liquidations are obviously a big factor in the price crash,” said Clara Medalie, head of research at Kaiko, a provider of cryptocurrency market data in Paris, and recalled the sudden fall in value of the cryptocurrency in mid-May. “It is a doom-loop.”

Bankman-Fried said on Sunday that only a small percentage of traders are taking advantage of the maximum leverage available. He also argued that FTX had fewer liquidations than other exchanges and that he had long sought to “promote responsible trading”.

Still, he predicted in an interview last week that some investors would not welcome a move to reduce debt. “We’d get a consumer outcry if we got rid of it and we’d get very bad press,” he said. “But it could be the right thing.”

Mr Bankman-Fried also admitted that high leverage created the impression that exchanges like him were promoting risky trading, although he claimed it was not a fair conclusion.

Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, offers up to 125x leverage. Changpeng Zhao, the Sino-Canadian founder of Binance and a developer who traces his professional roots back to Wall Street, has said that the extreme leverage numbers were just a “marketing gimmick” and that most traders don’t use them.

Timothy Massad, the former chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which regulates derivatives in the U.S., said he welcomed FTX’s decision and hoped other platforms like Binance would follow suit.

The change, he said, could be motivated in part by FTX’s success last week in raising $ 900 million in venture capital, the highest ever value for a cryptocurrency exchange. FTX’s high leverage offerings are more likely to damage its reputation as Mr Bankman-Fried seeks to expand the global reach of its platform, Mr Massad said.

“Sam has bigger visions, and this step removes a focus that might be in the way,” said Massad. “Take it off the table.”

Categories
Health

This is a map displaying the place low vaccination charges meet excessive case counts as infections surge

In more and more US states with low vaccination rates, Covid cases are rising, exposing residents to the risk of “unnecessary” infections, hospitalizations and possibly death as the Delta variant rips across the country, according to US health officials.

“After several weeks of falling case numbers followed by a long plateau, we are now seeing an increase in the number of cases in many parts of the country,” said Dr. Jay Butler, CDC assistant director, infectious diseases, on a call hosted Tuesday by an industry group. Hospitalization rates, which tend to lag behind confirmed cases, are similarly starting to rise, he said.

A CNBC analysis of US vaccination rates and Covid cases shows that there are 463 counties in the United States with high rates of infection – which have reported at least 100 new cases per 100,000 residents in the last week – more than double the US rate . The majority of these counties, 80%, vaccinated less than 40% of their 23 million residents, analysis shows data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and Johns Hopkins University.

More than half of the counties in Missouri, Arkansas and Louisiana have low vaccination rates and increased Covid cases, according to CNBC analysis. These three states had some of the highest cases per capita in the country in the past seven days as the spread of the Delta variant increased in southwest Missouri.

“There will continue to be an increase in cases among unvaccinated Americans and in communities with low vaccination rates, especially given the spread of the more transmissible Delta variant,” Jeff Zients, White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator, told a news conference last week . Virtually all Covid hospital admissions and deaths, 99.5%, occur in those who have not been vaccinated, US officials say.

In fact, nationwide cases are on the rise again as the highly transmissible delta variant asserts itself as the dominant strain in the US. The seven-day average of newly confirmed Covid cases has risen to about 23,300 per day, almost double the weekly average, according to data from Johns Hopkins before.

The rise of the Delta variant has spurred officials in some states like Mississippi to issue new calls for masking and social distancing, especially among older and more vulnerable residents.

“When the Delta strain emerged (in Utah) it quickly became the dominant strain, and by dominant I don’t mean 50%. For the last full week of data, more than 80% of the sequence viruses were Delta viruses and so far this week are it is 92% of all variants, “said Dr. Andrew T. Pavia, director of the Department of Pediatric Infectious Diseases at the University of Utah School of Medicine, in a call hosted Tuesday by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

“If you think about what it means to have such a rapid virus takeover, it means that it is the most suitable virus, that it spreads more efficiently, that it spreads in unvaccinated pockets, and many diseases cause a lot of stress inside” , he added.

Mississippi has given at least one injection to just 37% of its population, making it last in the country. Officials there urged people over 65 and immunocompromised residents to avoid indoor mass gatherings in the next two weeks in the event of “significant transmission” of the Delta variant in the coming weeks.

“We don’t want anyone to die unnecessarily,” said Dr. Mississippi State Health Commissioner Thomas Dobbs during a news conference Friday.

According to Dr. Rochelle Walensky, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as successful in preventing serious illness, hospitalizations and deaths from the Delta variant.

Breakthrough infections are rare, and around 75% of people who die or are hospitalized after being vaccinated with Covid are over 65 years old, according to the CDC.

“Preliminary data for the past six months suggests that 99.5% of deaths from Covid-19 in the states have occurred in unvaccinated people … the suffering and loss we see now are almost entirely preventable,” Walensky said Earlier this month.

In addition to the risk of disease for Americans who have not yet received a vaccination, unvaccinated sections of the population could threaten the country’s ability to control the pandemic. Continued transmission of the virus means additional opportunities for new variants to emerge with the ability to bypass vaccine protection.

While 48% of Americans are fully vaccinated, the pace of daily vaccinations has slowed significantly in recent months. According to CDC data, an average of about 515,000 vaccinations were administered daily for the past week, after a steady decline from the peak of more than 3 million daily vaccinations.

President Joe Biden renewed his administration’s efforts to increase vaccination rates after failing to meet his July 4th goals, with a focus on youth and increasing availability in places like doctor’s offices and work environments.

Nearly 1,600 counties in 40 states with 72 million people have vaccinated less than 40% of their population, according to CNBC analysis. Six states where vaccination data were not available at the county level were excluded from the analysis.

Categories
Health

5 vaccinated international locations with excessive Covid charges depend on China vaccines

Covid-19 vaccines from Chinese companies Sinopharm (left) and Sinovac arrived at Phnom Penh International Airport in Cambodia on June 8, 2021.

Sovannara | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

Among the countries with both high vaccination rates and high Covid-19 infection rates, most rely on vaccines made in China, a CNBC analysis shows.

The results come as the effectiveness of Chinese vaccines comes under increasing scrutiny, compounded by a lack of data on their protection against the more transmissible Delta variant. CNBC found that weekly population-adjusted Covid cases have remained elevated in at least six of the world’s most heavily vaccinated countries – and five of them rely on vaccines from China.

CNBC identified 36 countries with more than 1,000 weekly new confirmed cases per million people on July 6, using figures from Our World in Data, which compiles information from sources such as the World Health Organization, governments and Oxford University researchers. CNBC then identified countries among those 36 where more than 60% of the population had received at least one dose of the Covid vaccine.

There were six countries, and five of them use Chinese vaccines as an essential part of their national vaccination programs: United Arab Emirates, Seychelles, Mongolia, Uruguay, and Chile. The only country among them that does not rely on Chinese vaccines is the United Kingdom.

The UK has now approved vaccines from Moderna, AstraZeneca-Oxford, Pfizer-BioNTech and Janssen. Covid cases in the UK have increased in recent weeks as the more transmissible Delta variant has spread there.

Sinopharm and Sinovac did not respond to CNBC requests for comment.

Several factors can lead to an increase in Covid cases in countries with high vaccination rates. Vaccines do not offer one hundred percent protection, so those who are vaccinated can still get infected. At the same time, new variants of the coronavirus might prove better at overcoming vaccines.

The best option for many countries

Countries shouldn’t stop using Covid-19 vaccines from China, epidemiologists say, especially when vaccine supplies are limited in low- and middle-income countries.

Many of the countries and territories that have approved Sinopharm and Sinovac vaccines are developing countries that cannot compete with wealthier countries for vaccines developed in the United States and Europe.

Ben Cowling, a professor in the University of Hong Kong’s School of Public Health, said countries could choose to use certain vaccines depending on their long-term goals.

“Some countries may accept low prevalence as long as there are relatively few serious cases and deaths from COVID-19,” Cowling, who heads the school’s epidemiology and biostatistics department, told CNBC in an email. “That should be achievable with a high coverage of all available vaccines.”

However, some countries avoid vaccines in China. Costa Rica turned down shipments of vaccines developed by Sinovac last month after it concluded they were not effective enough.

WHO approval

The World Health Organization has approved Sinopharm and Sinovac vaccines for emergency use.

The two Chinese vaccines are less effective than Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, both of which have shown greater than 90% effectiveness.

Sinopharm’s vaccine is 79% effective against symptomatic Covid infections, the WHO says, but its effectiveness in certain groups – such as people over 60 – is not clear. The effectiveness of Sinovac’s shot ranges from around 50% to over 80%, depending on the country in which the trials took place.

Experts say that the results cannot be directly compared between clinical trials because each study is structured differently. However, a study in Hong Kong found “significantly higher” antibody levels in people who received the BioNTech injection compared to those who received the Sinovac vaccine, the South China Morning Post reported.

Some experts suggest that the technology behind the various Covid vaccines could explain differences in their effectiveness.

Sinopharm and Sinovac vaccines trigger an immune response by exposing the body to a weakened or “inactivated” virus – a proven method that vaccines have used for decades. Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna based their vaccines on a technology called messenger RNA, which instructs the body to make viral proteins that trigger an immune response.

“Inactivated vaccines are easy to make and are known for their safety, but tend to have a weaker immune response compared to some other vaccine types,” wrote Michael Head, Senior Research Fellow on Global Health at the University of Southampton in the UK, in an article, published on The Conversation website.

Still, large phase three clinical trials showed that inactivated vaccines were “highly effective against serious illness and death” from Covid, Cowling said.

The professor told CNBC that the spikes in Covid cases in some countries using Chinese vaccines “are typically an increase in mild infections with very few severe cases in fully vaccinated people”.

‘Herd Immunity’

When vaccines are less effective, more people need to be vaccinated to achieve “herd immunity”. This happens when the virus stops being transmitted quickly because most people are immune to vaccination or have recovered from an infection.

Some countries decided to try to achieve herd immunity at the beginning of the pandemic, but are not known to have succeeded. Some who said they would achieve herd immunity, like Sweden, have been hit much harder by Covid than neighboring countries that have taken the vaccination route.

A study by the Kirby Institute at the University of New South Wales in Sydney claimed that in the Australian state of New South Wales, herd immunity could be achieved if 66% of the population were given vaccines that were 90% effective against all infections.

The percentage of the population who needs to be vaccinated increases to 86% when vaccine effectiveness is 70%, and herd immunity is not achievable when vaccine effectiveness is below 60%, the study showed.

Categories
Health

Quidel recollects Lyra Covid take a look at attributable to excessive threat of false detrimental outcomes

A man inquires in a mobile test car in Brooklyn, New York, the United States, Jan.

Brendan McDermid | Reuters

Quidel is recalling its Lyra Covid-19 assay test due to a high risk of false negative results in patients who actually have high levels of the virus.

Quidel is a company that makes diagnostic health products worldwide. The Covid test received emergency approval from the Food and Drug Administration in March. It uses a swab sample from the nasal area to detect RNA that is specific for the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

“False-negative results can lead to delayed diagnosis or inadequate treatment of SARS-CoV-2, which can harm the patient, cause serious illness and death,” the FDA wrote on its website announcing the recall.

False negative results could also spread the virus further into a community, putting others at high risk of injury or death.

Quidel has received five complaints about the product, but there are currently no reports of injury or death from its use. The company’s stock plunged around 5% in after-hours trading.

Categories
Politics

Proving Racist Intent: Democrats Face Excessive New Bar in Opposing Voting Legal guidelines

The Supreme Court’s 6-to-3 ruling on Thursday that upheld the Arizona voting restrictions effectively raised the bar for voting lawyers for filing federal cases under the Voting Rights Act: demonstrating discriminatory intent.

This burden is causing civil rights and electoral groups to reshuffle their approach in court to challenge the series of new restrictions imposed by Republican-controlled lawmakers this year following Donald J. Trump’s electoral defeat in November. You can no longer rely on the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, to act as a backbone to prevent racially discriminatory electoral restrictions.

“We have to remember that the Supreme Court doesn’t save us – it will not protect our democracy in those moments when it is most needed, ”said Sam Spital, the head of litigation at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, on Friday.

The Supreme Court in a 2013 ruling gutted the core protections of the Voting Rights Act, and on Thursday the court further narrowed the law’s scope in combating discriminatory laws by setting tough new guidelines for demonstrating the effects of the law on colored voters thus litigation parties to overcome the much higher bar for the evidence of a specific intention to discriminate.

Mr Spital said his group must carefully weigh their next steps and “think very carefully” before bringing up new cases that, if defeated, could set harmful new precedents. The Arizona case, filed by the Democratic National Committee in 2016, was seen as a weak tool to challenge new electoral laws; even the Biden administration acknowledged that Arizona law was non-discriminatory under the electoral law. Choosing the wrong cases in the wrong jurisdictions could lead to further setbacks, said Mr. Spital and other proxies.

At the same time, according to Mr. Spital, it is imperative that the election restrictions imposed by the Republicans do not remain unchallenged.

“It will force us to work even harder in the cases we bring,” he said. “Once the rules of the game are in place, even if they’re against us, we have the resources – we have exceptional lawyers, exceptional clients, and we have the facts on our side.”

Thursday’s ruling also revealed an uncomfortable new reality for Democrats and electoral activists: Under current law, they can expect little help from the federal courts with electoral laws passed by the party that controls a state government. Republican lawmakers in Georgia, Florida, and Iowa have been aggressive to enforce electoral laws, brushing aside protests from Democrats, constituencies, and even big corporations.

The Arizona Republicans were open about the partisan nature of their efforts when the Supreme Court heard the case in March. An Arizona Republican Party attorney told judges that the restrictions were necessary because, without them, Republicans in the state would have “a competitive disadvantage compared to the Democrats.”

“It’s a lot harder to prove these things – it takes a lot more evidence,” said Travis Crum, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis who specializes in voting rights and reassignment cases.Courts are often reluctant to label lawmakers as racist. That is why the effect standard was added in 1982. “

The High Court’s decision also increases stakes for the 2022 gubernatorial competitions in major swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, where Democratic governors stand ready to block measures proposed by Republican-controlled lawmakers. If a Republican won the governor’s seat in any of these states, lawmakers would have a clear way of enforcing new electoral laws.

Republicans on Friday praised the Supreme Court ruling, calling it an affirmation of the need to tackle electoral fraud – although no evidence of widespread fraud emerged in President Biden’s victory.

Justin Riemer, chief counsel for the Republican National Committee, argued that the new majority opinion Judge Samuel Alito “guides” would be welcome and would force recognition of the wider choice in a state.

“It affirmed, for example, that states have an incredibly important interest in protecting themselves from electoral fraud and in strengthening voter confidence,” said Riemer. “When the court looked at Arizona law, it found how generous the voting rules were.”

Riemer noted that Democrats would also find it harder to meet new standards to show that laws place undue burdens on voters.

“I don’t want to say that it completely excludes them from Section 2, but it will make it very difficult for them to remove laws that are really minimal, if any, onerous,” said Riemer, referring to the sections of the Voting Rights Act dealing with racially discriminatory practices.

Major rulings by the Supreme Court confirming a new restriction on the right to vote have been followed in the past by waves of new law at the state level. In 2011, 34 states introduced some form of new voter identification laws after the court upheld the Indiana Voter Identification Act in 2008.

The first immediate test of a newly encouraged legislature will take place next week in Texas, where the legislature is due to hold a special session in a second attempt by Republicans to pass an election revision bill. The first attempt failed after the Democrats staged a controversial night strike in the state legislature and temporarily halted proposals that were among the most restrictive in the country.

These proposals included bans on new voting methods, shortening Sunday elections, and provisions that would facilitate the cancellation of elections and greatly empower partisan election observers.

The uncertain litigation will be played out in a federal justice system reshaped during Mr. Trump’s tenure, and Democrats in Congress have failed to enact federal voter protection.

The Legal Defense Fund, which Mr. Spital represents, sued Georgia in May over its new voting laws, arguing that the laws had a discriminatory effect. Other lawsuits, including one filed by the Justice Department last week, argue that Georgia acted with intent to discriminate against colored voters.

However, some Democrats complained about the Supreme Court decision, but noted that they still have many constitutional tools to challenge repressive electoral laws.

“Obviously, litigation is getting harder now,” said Aneesa McMillan, deputy general manager of Super PAC Priorities USA, which oversees the organization’s voting efforts. “But most of the cases we contest we contest based on the first, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution.”

One of the guidelines that Judge Alito formulated was an assessment of the “standard practice” of voting in 1982 when Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was amended.

“It is relevant that in 1982 the states generally obliged almost all voters to cast their ballots in person on election day, and only allowed narrow and well-defined categories of voters to cast postal ballots,” wrote Judge Alito.

The court did not address the purpose clause in Section 2. However, these cases are often based on racist statements by lawmakers or irregularities in the legislative process – elements of a legal dispute that are more difficult to prove than the effects.

“You won’t get any evidence of this smoking gun,” said Sophia Lakin, the ACLU’s deputy director of the Voting Rights Project. “Much evidence is being brought together to show that the purpose is to take away the rights of colored voters.”

In Texas, some Democrats in the Legislature had hoped they could work towards a more moderate version of the bill in the special session beginning next week; It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court decision will lead Republicans to adopt an even more restrictive law.

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and State Representative Briscoe Cain, both Republicans, did not respond to requests for comment. Speaker Dan Phelan and State Senator Bryan Hughes, both Republicans, declined to comment.

However, whether the Supreme Court decision will open the floodgates for more restrictive electoral laws in other states remains an open question; more than 30 state legislatures adjourned for the year, and others have already passed their voting laws.

“It is hard to imagine what an increase in election restrictions would look like now because we are already seeing such a dramatic increase, more than ever since the reconstruction,” said Wendy Weiser, director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, a research institute. “But the passing of new waves of laws has certainly been the answer in recent years.”

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers is one of the Democratic governors withholding voting actions passed by Republican-led lawmakers. On Wednesday, he vetoed the first of several Republican electoral process laws.

In an interview, he said that the Republicans’ months of efforts to revive the 2020 elections have made voting at the health and education level a top priority for voters in Wisconsin.

“People are realizing more and more that it’s an important issue,” said Evers. “Frankly, the Republicans have taken it upon themselves. I don’t think the Wisconsin people thought the election was stolen. You understand it was a fair choice. And so the Republicans’ inability to accept the loss of Donald Trump makes it more of a bread-and-butter problem here. “

Categories
Health

Asia faces ‘bumpy street’ forward as Covid instances stay excessive

A woman is given a dose of Covid-19 vaccine during the mass vaccination at Tanah Abang Textile Market in Jakarta, Indonesia on June 19, 2021.

Agung Kuncahya B. | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

Asia’s fight against the coronavirus is far from over, but an expected increase in the spread of Covid vaccines in the coming months could defuse the situation, according to investment bank HSBC.

India was the hardest hit country this year, suffering from a devastating second wave that saw cases soar between February and early May. Although the daily reported numbers of infections have dropped significantly from a peak of over 414,000 cases in a day, the South Asian nation still reports an average of 50,000 cases per day.

Countries like Indonesia, Malaysia and Nepal have seen a sharp surge in cases recently, while the numbers of infections in other places continue to rise. Nations like Singapore, South Korea, Japan, and China have also faced outbreaks recently.

“It’s easy to believe or tempting to think we’ve got through it all, but the reality is, if you look at Asia ex-India, we’re currently seeing record numbers of daily infections,” said Frederic Neumann, co-head of Asian economic research at HSBC, said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia” on Wednesday.

“There are still terrible human tariffs in many parts of Southeast Asia and even in India,” he said.

Delta variant

Experts say the closely watched coronavirus mutation known as the delta variant is partly responsible for the rise in new cases in many parts of the world. First discovered in India and now present in over 80 countries, Delta is said to be more contagious than previous variants.

Although it remains unclear whether the variant is more deadly than previous strains, its increased transmissibility, especially in environments with low vaccination and minimal social distancing, means that in absolute terms it is likely to infect more people, according to analysts at political risk advisory group Eurasia Group.

“Countries with younger populations and wetter climates could therefore experience more severe outbreaks than previous waves, even if the proportion of young people with serious illnesses remains the same,” said Eurasia Group analysts in a recent statement. They added that there is a growing risk of health system overload in many emerging markets.

Asia lags far behind North America and Europe in vaccines. The data showed that just over 23% of the population received at least one Covid vaccine dose, compared to over 40% or more in the other two regions.

“We are far from finished,” said Neumann from HSBC. “That said, if we look at the third quarter, there’s still a risk that at least some glitches will get through. We just need these vaccines. We need more supply. We have to introduce them. “

Economic recovery

Neumann said that based on publicly available information, HSBC predicts that many Asian countries will not achieve herd immunity until early 2022 at the earliest.

“That means some of the restrictions, especially on travel, remain in place, and unfortunately that still means a bit of a bumpy road for the next few months,” he said.

When a country reaches herd immunity, it means that the virus can no longer spread rapidly because most of the population is either fully vaccinated or would have become immune from infection.

In a release, Neumann and other HSBC analysts said they expect local demand growth in the region to pick up pace over the next six months. It is due to a large, expected surge in vaccine distribution, they said.

According to the bank, exports remain strong despite ongoing transport disruptions and supply chain bottlenecks.

“The latter should slowly subside as demand for services recalibrates and factories make up for lost time. However, the crisis has shown that there is an urgent need for more investment in capacity – expect investment to rise as the region tiptoe out of the pandemic, ”wrote the HSBC analysts.

The investment bank forecast that Asia (excluding Australia and New Zealand) will grow 6.6% year-on-year in 2021 – compared to a 0.9% decline in the previous year – and 4.6% in 2022.

Categories
Politics

Excessive Hopes for Johnson & Johnson’s Covid Vaccine Have Fizzled within the U.S.

But manufacturing problems at a factory in Baltimore run by Emergent BioSolutions, Johnson & Johnson’s subcontractor, have had serious consequences for the vaccine. Because of a major production mishap that resulted in a two-month shutdown in operations, Johnson & Johnson has essentially been forced to sit out the brunt of the pandemic in the United States while Pfizer and Moderna, the other federally authorized vaccine makers, provided almost all the nation’s vaccine stock.

Johnson & Johnson has had to throw out the equivalent of 75 million doses, and the regulatory authorities in Canada, South Africa and the European Union also decided to pull back millions more doses made at the Baltimore plant. The company has been able to deliver only one-fourth of the 100 million doses it promised the federal government by the end of this month.

Dr. Anne Zink, Alaska’s chief medical officer, said that in her state, Johnson & Johnson’s shot had become a victim of its own timing. By late February, when it was authorized by the Food and Drug Administration, Alaska had figured out how to get two-dose vaccines to remote areas, leaving the one-shot regimen less crucial than she had initially imagined.

Dr. Clay Marsh, West Virginia’s Covid-19 czar, said that the pause and Johnson & Johnson’s later authorization — more than two months after Pfizer’s and Moderna’s — deprived it of a “halo effect.” By the time West Virginia had an ample supply of all three vaccines, he said, “people started to get this concept that maybe there’s something better about being immunized with Pfizer and Moderna.”

The Johnson & Johnson shot had also suffered from a “social network effect,” said Andrew C. Anderson, a professor of public health at Tulane University who researches vaccine hesitancy. Most Americans who were inoculated in the early months of the vaccine campaign received Moderna and Pfizer shots, and so their friends and family were less likely to deviate and accept a different brand.

In Louisiana, hospitals in the New Orleans area have started offering the Johnson & Johnson shot to people on their way out of the emergency room; the thinking is that people will be more likely to accept the vaccine when a doctor who has treated them asks them to take it. And in Arkansas, where only a third of the population is fully vaccinated, state officials are offering Johnson & Johnson doses to agriculture, manufacturing, wastewater and poultry workers, with gift certificates for hunting and fishing licenses as a reward.