Categories
Entertainment

Prince Harry Proclaims $1.5 Million Memoir Charity Donation

In addition to telling us his side of the story, Prince Harry’s upcoming memoir will benefit charities as well. While participating in a polo game for Sentable on August 19, the Duke of Sussex announced that he would donate $ 1.5 million of the proceeds of his memoirs to the charity. “This is one of several donations I would like to make to charity, and I am grateful to be able to give back to the children and communities in desperate need,” Harry said in a statement.

Harry founded Sentable with Prince Seeiso of Lesotho in 2006 to help children affected by the HIV / AIDS epidemic in Africa. “Our realigned mission at Sentebale is to address the urgent needs of vulnerable children in southern Africa, provide them with access to vital health services, receive the care they need and build skills to be more resilient and self-sufficient in the future,” added Harry added. In response to Harry’s donation, the charity expressed its appreciation in a statement: “Sentebale is grateful for his personal contribution, which enables the organization to continue to work fully and to continue to provide important services to vulnerable youth in southern Africa.”

The memoir, set to be released in 2022, will cover everything from Harry’s childhood and time in the military to his marriage to Meghan Markle. “I’ve worn many hats over the years, literally and figuratively, and I hope that by telling my story – the ups and downs, the mistakes, the lessons learned – I can help show them that no matter where we come from, we have more in common than we think, “he said in a statement announcing the book.” I am deeply grateful for the opportunity to share what I have learned in my life so far. and I am pleased that people are reading a first hand account of my life that is accurate and completely truthful. “

Categories
World News

Harry Will Attend Philip’s Funeral, Elevating Hope Royal Rift Will Heal

LONDON – Buckingham Palace said Saturday that Prince Harry would be returning to the UK for Prince Philip’s funeral this coming weekend to spark feverish speculation over whether the reunion would fix fences in the royal family or sow deeper discord.

The visit, Harry’s first since stepping down as high-ranking king last year, will force a meeting with his brother, Prince William, and father, Prince Charles, whom Harry said in an explosive interview last month was in one trapped in unhappy palace life. But Harry will be traveling without his wife, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, who, according to palace officials, would stay at the couple’s California home by order of the doctor because she is in the final stages of pregnancy.

For weeks as the world waited for Oprah Winfrey’s interview with Harry and Meghan last month, many Brits’ eyes were on the health of Philip, Harry’s grandfather, who had been hospitalized with heart disease.

The newspapers pictured Prince Charles getting out of bed of Philip, his father, in February – the son’s eyes bloodshot as he was evicted. Harry and Meghan have been scourged for comments about leaving their royal roles, which critics found indecent in the face of Philip’s illness. “Don’t you have any respect?” yelled the Daily Mail.

This period of national concern about Philip’s health lent sympathy to the royal family amid an unusual cloud of dust within the institution that brother versus brother when Harry accused his family of racism and emotional abandonment in an interview with Mrs. Winfrey.

With this conflict still raging, Philip’s death on Friday at the age of 99 opened a new and uncertain chapter in the turbulent life of the House of Windsor. Among the first acts of the post-Philip era was the announcement that Harry would attend his grandfather’s funeral, slated for April 17, a scaled-down ceremony that palace officials said would be limited to 30 people.

No question bothered royal watchers more than whether Harry would make peace with his brother, Prince William, after a month-long feud.

“Harry will come home and a meeting between the brothers and maybe, with luck, a reconciliation over their dead grandfather might be a possibility,” said Penny Junor, a royal historian.

Or not.

“It will go one way or the other,” said Ms. Junor. “There is a kind of war going on in the family that is fought out in public. It was everything the family doesn’t want. “

The warming of these tensions during Philip’s hospital stay created an uncomfortable split screen with Buckingham Palace defenders attacking Harry and Meghan for doing anything that could harm the patriarch’s health.

In her interview, Meghan referred to Philip’s illness after Mrs Winfrey asked about regrets. She said she woke up that morning to find out that Philip had been hospitalized.

Even so, she and Harry offered a painful account of their lives in “The Firm,” the family institution that Philip spent much of his life preserving.

They said family members have raised concerns about how dark the skin of the couple’s then-unborn child, Archie, would be. Meghan said her mental health efforts had been rejected by palace officials who were concerned about possible harm to the monarchy.

Harry was so concerned about how the interview would affect Philip and Queen Elizabeth II that he contacted Ms. Winfrey shortly after it aired.

“He wanted to make sure I knew, and when I had the opportunity to share, that his grandmother or grandfather wasn’t part of those conversations,” she told CBS News, referring to the comments on Archie’s skin color.

The interview was barely featured in wall-to-wall coverage of Philip’s death on UK news channels on Friday. And for some in the country, it was a time to leave the royal turmoil of the past few months behind.

“Obviously there was so much scandal over the Meghan and Harry thing,” said 18-year-old Lottie Smith, who heard of Philip’s death on a train ride to London on Friday and came to Buckingham Palace to pay her respects. “I think his death will somehow leave that alone now.”

Her friend Catherine Vellacott, 19, stepped in in hopes that she “might unite the nation more”.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson saw it that way too. He tossed Philip’s death on Friday as a reminder of the glue that held Britain to its monarchy for so long.

“Like the seasoned coachman that he was,” said Mr Johnson of Philip outside Downing Street, “he helped steer the royal family and monarchy so that it remains an institution conducive to balance and happiness is undeniably important to our national life. ” ”

Even so, the greatest test of whether Philip’s death can reunite his warring family seems likely to come at his funeral.

In keeping with Philip’s preference to avoid fuss, as well as Covid-19 restrictions on large gatherings, he will not be in the state, a ceremony where the public should have seen his coffin. The 30-person limit for his funeral at St. George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle was in line with state restrictions and forced him to cut back a guest list that would normally have been several hundred people.

Palace officials said Saturday that his coffin would be carried around the palace grounds in a Land Rover. The plans for the television ceremony that Philip approved a few years ago have been scaled back because of the pandemic.

Members of the royal family and military personnel will take part in the procession.

Gun salutes marking Philip’s death were fired from cities in the four nations of the United Kingdom and at sea on Saturday. This tradition goes back centuries. In London, among other things, 13 pounder field guns from the First World War were fired, which were also fired at the wedding of Philip and Queen Elizabeth II in 1947.

While serving in the British Navy during World War II, Philip was credited with devising a plan in 1943 to save the lives of crew members when they were shot at by German bombers.

Harry told James Corden, the talk show host, about video chatting with his grandfather and Archie during the lockdown in late February when Philip, instead of pressing the red button at the end of the call, opened the lid of the laptop.

Travelers to England need to self-isolate, although private coronavirus testing can shorten it. Harry’s representatives said he would follow the protocols.

Few elements of the conflict between Harry and the rest of his family have tormented the British as much as his strained relationship with William, with whom he once had a very close relationship.

“If there is a gathering at the funeral and the boys the brothers can talk to each other and forgive and forget, then I think the hope is that Philip’s death could end something that might otherwise have been going on for decades,” said Ms. Junor, the historian, who wrote, “The Company: The Troubled Life of House Windsor. “

“But that hasn’t happened yet, and it can’t happen,” she said. “I definitely hope so.”

Royal commentators suggest that as Philip stepped down from his busy public schedule in recent years, he continued to play an active role in major problems faced by the family, with Harry and Meghan departing.

If the Queen is Britain’s head of state, commentators say, Philip was the head of the royal household. He has been credited with giving television cameras an early glimpse into the family’s private life in the 1960s and introducing efficiency improvements at Buckingham Palace.

Still, his administration of the royal household was not without its difficulties. Known for cracking the whip, he wounded Charles, his eldest son, with frequent disparities. And while Philip took upon himself to steer the family through marital issues, he was blamed in part for the palace’s seemingly reluctant response to grief over the death of Charles’ wife Diana, Princess of Wales, in a car accident in Paris in 1997.

Geneva Abdul and Stephen Castle contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Health

Meghan and Harry Interview: A Trauma Knowledgeable Weighs In

Being treated as irrelevant by family members – the attachment trauma or witnessing persistent patterns of abuse – creates a different type of psychological pattern. People’s identity is based on questions like “What did I do wrong?”. or “What could I have done differently?” That becomes the central preoccupation of her life.

The important factors are what these challenges are and at what age they arise. The character is formed in the first 10 to 14 years of life. These years are the most critical and the sooner a real trauma occurs, the more lasting it is usually. As people get older, they become more independent agents and can tolerate more rejection and more emotional pain.

Don’t most children experience at least one experience that they later consider traumatic or severely challenging?

Yes. Most people have very challenging lives, and major conflicts with family members are by no means uncommon. To be rejected by your in-laws – this is of course not uncommon, and it doesn’t matter how prominent you are or whether you live in a palace. Then a major problem in the couple’s relationships becomes whether the spouse chooses you or their family.

Could the same experience that changed one child’s life have less of an impact on another child’s life?

Yes. People have very different impulses, very different reactions to the same challenges. But your attachment system – who you belong to, who knows you, who loves you, who you play with – is more fundamental than trauma. As long as people feel safe with the people in their immediate vicinity, in their families, tribes or troops, they are amazingly resilient.

Risking or relinquishing these bonds, as Harry did, is a very profound step. The standard psychological position is to adapt your behavior and expectations to your family of origin. It takes tremendous courage to break these bonds and create new and more fruitful connections.

Categories
Business

Buckingham Palace’s response after Harry and Meghan’s Oprah interview

Queen Elizabeth II looks out of a window at Pinewood Studios’ underwater stage on November 2, 2007.

Pool / Tim Graham Picture Library | Tim Graham Photo Library | Getty Images

LONDON – All eyes are on Buckingham Palace after Prince Harry and the Duchess of Sussex conducted an explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey on Tuesday, alleging racism at the palace and lack of support from the royal family regarding mental health issues were media slump.

So far, following the interview, which aired Sunday night on CBS and Monday night on UK broadcaster ITV and drew millions of viewers on both sides of the Atlantic, there has been a wall of silence from the royal family.

The palace is said to have had “crisis talks,” according to British media reports including the BBC, with senior royals having urgent discussions on how to limit the impact of the interview in which Harry and Meghan claimed they were members of the royal family had asked what skin tone her unborn child could be.

Meghan, the first multiracial member of the modern British royal family, would not reveal who made the comment, saying, “It would be too harmful for her.”

The palace would not comment on the interview if contacted by CNBC on Tuesday. During a public visit to a Covid vaccination center in London on Tuesday, Prince Charles was asked what he thought of the interview by a Sky News reporter but made no comment.

Oprah Winfrey later made it clear that the king who made the comment was not Queen Elizabeth II or Prince Philip. The two-hour interview, cleverly conducted by veteran broadcaster Winfrey, was seen by 17.1 million viewers in the United States. More than 12 million viewers watched the British broadcast, as ITV announced on Tuesday.

In addition to allegations of racism, the interview contained harmful allegations that the Palace did not support Meghan when she was experiencing mental health issues that made her suicidal.

Talking about the pressures of royal life, the Sussexes also said they had been told to leave the UK and step back from their role as working royals early last year because the British tabloids were hostile to saying the palace had failed to defend them.

(LR) Queen Elizabeth II, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, Prince William, Duke of Cambridge and Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge, watch the RAF route on the balcony of Buckingham Palace while members of the Royal Family attend events to mark the 100th anniversary of the RAF on July 10th 2018 in London, England.

Neil Mockford | GC images

Still, the couple also said the royal family welcomed Meghan when their relationship began in 2016. Meghan also said that the queen has always been “wonderful” to her.

The British press responded on Tuesday with a mixture of acknowledgment of the harmfulness of the interview and a certain degree of defensiveness.

While many newspapers pondered the “bombing” allegations that “rocked” the palace, others said the interview was selfish for the couple and disrespectful to the queen. The Daily Mirror headline said the interview sparked “the worst royal crisis in 85 years,” while the Daily Express headlined “So sad it came” alongside a picture of the Queen. Meanwhile, the Daily Mail headlined its newspaper Tuesday morning, “What have you done?”

How harmful is it?

The interview has questioned commentators and royal correspondents about how damaging the allegations are to the royal family, an institution that has worked to uphold a public image of duty and decency and has always tried to address internal family matters, let alone cracks and Controversy, keep out of the spotlight.

After the interview aired in the US, there was widespread public support for Meghan among commentators and friends of the couple. In Britain, a country where most people hold the Queen in high esteem, if not always the broader monarchy, the response has been more mixed.

In a live YouGov poll on Tuesday, the public was asked after the interview, “with whom you mostly sympathize”. The latest results showed that 40% of those polled were more personable to the Queen and Royal Family, and 24% to Harry and Meghan. Significantly, another 24% said “neither”.

Oprah Winfrey interviews Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.

Harpo Productions | Joe Pugliese | Getty Images

Whether the revelations will spark a lasting fascination with the British royal family at home and abroad remains to be seen. However, the dispute will restart the debate about the value of the monarchy and the republican sentiment.

In Australia, part of the Commonwealth and where the Queen is still head of state, there has already been discussion about whether it is time for change. Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull reportedly told ABC TV on Tuesday that “our head of state should be.” An Australian citizen should be one of us, not the Queen or the King of the United Kingdom. “

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said Monday that the country is unlikely to stop having the queen as head of state anytime soon.

Royal worth?

There has long been a debate about the value and cost of the monarchy, which brings tourism revenue to the country but also burdens the UK taxpayer.

The royal household receives income from the so-called Crown Estate – land owned by the Queen such as Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle, which are open to the public at normal times and generate income – and from the so-called Sovereign Grant.

The one-time grant is government-paid money that enables the queen to “perform her duties as head of state,” says the government, but it also supports the official duties of other high-ranking kings such as foreign visits, hospitality and public engagements.

In return for these public funds, however, the Queen must surrender the revenue from the Crown Estate to the government, which in turn calculates how much money the grant represents.

The government stated last year how the Sovereign Grant works: “In return for this public support, the Queen is handing over the proceeds from The Crown Estate to the government, which amounted to £ 343.5 million for the period 2018-19. The Sovereign Grant for 2020-21 is £ 85.9m which is 25% of £ 343.5m. “

The government grant for the 2018-2019 period was £ 82.2m (US $ 107.1m) compared to £ 76.1m for the 2017-2018 period, which is £ 1.24 per person in the UK. Currently the royal family costs each British (on a) total population 66.8 million) £ 1.28 a year.

That’s not much as the royal family draws visitors to the UK. The tourism agency Visit Britain reported back in 2017 that tourism linked to royal residences such as Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle has 2.7 million visitors annually. However, it is difficult to determine how many visitors are coming to the UK specifically because of the monarchy.

Royal weddings, including Prince William and Kate Middleton in 2011 and the wedding of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle in 2018, have also been seen as boosting UK tourism by attracting hundreds of thousands of visitors and boosting GDP. The weddings of both princes have been a boon to British tourism and the economy. Again, weddings involve extra security and expenses that ultimately fall on the taxpayer’s shoulders. Harry and Meghan’s wedding reportedly cost about $ 42.8 million, with a large portion of the budget spent on security and additional policing, while William and Kate’s wedding in 2011 cost the taxpayer £ 20 million, or about US $ 27 million -Dollars cost.

The anti-monarchy campaign group Republic denies the idea that the monarchy is a boon to British tourism, stating that there is no evidence to support such claims.

Categories
Business

Oprah, Meghan and Harry Draw 17.1 Million Viewers to CBS

Since then, the rise of digital media and its infinite screen time options have deeply struck the power of the major broadcasters. As audiences splintered, prime-time interview opportunities that had to be seen became more and more rare. Even the greatest lone fighters of the last few years lacked the character power of the specials from two decades ago and more. The 17.1 million audience for Ms. Winfrey’s interview with Ms. Markle and Prince Harry matched the number of viewers who tuned in when Caitlyn Jenner revealed that on a 2015 episode of ABC’s “20/20” she was transgender for Ms. Sawyer.

The Sunday night special was unusual in that it was not overseen by a network news department. Ms. Winfrey’s company, Harpo Productions, produced it, and CBS paid at least $ 7 million to license the show, according to one person with knowledge of the arrangement. (The Wall Street Journal previously reported the number.) The deal was also a gamble: it was taped after the network bought the rights, according to two people who knew how the show was made. During the interview, Ms. Winfrey said she had been trying to land the exclusive with the couple for about three years.

Despite Ms. Winfrey’s rocky experience, CBS was named a winner at 60 Minutes, where she made a special contribution in 2017 and 2018. In a 2019 interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Ms. Winfrey revealed that the show’s producers criticized her delivery. She said she had “too much emotion” in her voice even when she said her own name. (Ms. Winfrey was connected to the network through good friend Gayle King, an anchor on CBS This Morning, and appeared on that show on Monday.)

Another complication in CBS’s attempt to achieve the great success was the thicket of media outlets that surrounded Ms. Winfrey and the former royal couple. Ms. Winfrey has her own cable network, OWN, and is an important part of the AppleTV + streaming platform. The most recent episodes of Apple’s “The Oprah Conversation” featured her interviews with Barack Obama, Dolly Parton and Mariah Carey.

Ms. Markle and Prince Harry signed a multi-year deal with Netflix last year to direct documentaries and other shows. They also signed up to create podcasts for Spotify and released the first episode on December 29th. It included guest appearances by Elton John, Tyler Perry, and other celebrities, as well as the first public statement by her son Archie.

The pact between CBS and Harpo Productions mainly focused on TV rights. The interview ran live on ViacomCBS’s newly renamed streaming service, Paramount +; For now, at least, it won’t be available for on-demand viewing on Paramount +. Instead, the special will be available on CBS.com and the CBS app for 30 days, a CBS spokesperson said.

Originally played for 90 minutes, a two hour show ended. CBS released teaser clips prior to airing, and British tabloids unfriendly to Ms. Markle shot back with anonymized articles about her apparent misdeeds.

The estimate of 17.1 million viewers won’t grow until after Nielsen tabulates a few viewers who streamed the special, as well as the off-home ad.

Categories
Entertainment

Meghan and Harry Help Girls’s Shelter Broken Texas Storm

It was announced just last week that the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are officially stepping down from their royal duties for good, but that doesn’t mean they are stepping back from the causes that mean most to them. On February 21, Harry and Meghan surprised Genesis Women’s Shelter & Support in Dallas, TX, assisting them with repairs caused by the winter storm that devastated the state.

“Today news of our damage reached Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex!” Genesis Women’s Shelter & Support – an organization dedicated to providing protection, safety, and advice to women and children who have experienced domestic violence – wrote on their Twitter page. “Through your non-profit organization [Archewell Foundation]They support us by replacing the roof of our temporary shelter and helping us meet our immediate needs. ”

Although Meghan and Harry are forced to give up various royal patrons and honorary appointments by stepping down as high-ranking working members of the royal family, they can retain their private patronages, including charities and projects like Smart Works, Mayhew, The Invictus Games, and of course their Archewell Foundation . This under-the-radar couple’s recent help shows that the Duke and Duchess will always be people of action, regardless of royal patronage.

Genesis has set up an Amazon wish list to help with donations.

Today the news of our damage reached Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex! Through their non-profit organization, they support us by replacing the roof of our transitional shelter and helping us meet our immediate needs. THANK YOU, ARCHEWELL FOUNDATION! pic.twitter.com/rFtxzvtFRo

– Genesis Women’s Shelter & Support (@GenesisShelter) February 22, 2021