Categories
Entertainment

What Does a Dancing Physique Really feel Like in Ukraine? ‘I Am a Gun.’

Anna Vinogradova, an independent dance artist living in Kyiv, doesn’t carry a gun. She’s not even particularly patriotic, she said. Her body, though, is speaking up. “It’s like, I am a gun,” she said, “and I am staying here to protect the city.”

She knows that she can’t actually defend people. She knows the army is in charge of that. “But with my presence, with my energy,” she said, “I’m fighting.”

Before the Russian invasion on Feb. 24, Vinogradova helped to run a small movement school for children. She had also become enamored of pole dancing, which led to a satirical work, combining standup and pole dancing, that she performed in a strip club. Vinogradova dressed as a miner — a homage to her hometown, Donetsk, which has been in conflict with Russia since 2014.

“I tried to look at my culture through pole dancing,” she said.

Times have changed. Now there is little opportunity for that kind of artistic reflection or for dance making. “This is life and death, and there are many things that need to be done,” said Larissa Babij, a Ukrainian American dancer who has lived in Ukraine since 2005 and now works at the foundation Heroes Ukraine to support a unit of the country’s Special Operations Forces.

Stories of Ukrainian ballet dancers have made headlines in the United States and Europe, but I was curious about Ukraine’s lesser-known contingent of independent dance artists and contemporary choreographers. Over the past few months, I have spoken to more than a dozen independent and experimental dance artists living in Ukraine, in video interviews and on WhatsApp, to discover more about what the scene was — small and underfunded, yet a network of people all the same — and what it has become.

Many dancers have left Ukraine to live and work elsewhere — most going to other parts of Europe. And many who have remained understandably don’t have dancing on their minds. There’s too much else to contend with, even when bombs aren’t dropping.

Some are using their knowledge of bodies and dance in practical ways to help the military (and themselves) contend with the mental stress and physical strain of war. Others are finding solace in the simple yet essential routines that hold the body together — sleeping and showering, stretching and breathing. Viktor Ruban, a dance artist, scholar and activist, said he views these as a somatic practice that comes “from the impulse of the body.”

He also spoke about crying. He is not a crier. But when tears come, he lets them flow.

“The amplitude of the emotions is so, so huge on a daily basis,” he said. “I experience from my body the tension in the chest and also some muscle spasms and trembling feet or trembling arms, palms. Just noticing what’s happening in the body is also helping a lot.”

Beyond securing Ukraine’s freedom, there isn’t a theme tying the stories of these artists together. How could there be? This is a war and they are individuals, reacting to it and to their own altered reality in different ways.

Dance artists have a particular sensitivity to the way trauma inhabits the body. Many I spoke to have experience in somatic work, which places a spotlight on the internal experience of moving: feeling sensations within the body. It’s less about changing your outward physicality and more about how movement affects you from the inside out. It can be robust or slow and methodical; it tends to be calming and centering. An aim is to unearth a greater awareness of and insight into the mind-body connection.

Mykyta Bay-Kravchenko, a dancer and teacher who lives in Lviv, has started to teach somatic classes focusing on what he called “static movement,” which facilitates connections among people, in part because of how he feels in his own body: At times, frantic.

“I feel like something is drumming inside,” he said, likening the sensation to Steve Reich’s minimalist, propulsive composition “Drumming.” “It’s not a good feeling of energy. We have terrible news every day. Every day something is bombed, and always you have it in your mind that today can be your last day.”

Other artists are volunteering in humanitarian and military efforts. After the Russian invasion began, Krystyna Shyshkarova, whose Totem Dance School in Kyiv is a prominent space for contemporary dance, left for a small town in the Vinnytsia area in west-central Ukraine, where she used her skills as a teacher and a choreographer to direct volunteers. Around that time, she described the way she felt as having a “cold anger inside — I’m like a machine a little bit.”

Since early May, Shyshkarova has been back in Kyiv, where she is teaching and choreographing at her school, although with a much smaller group of students. One of her studios is deep in the building. There are no windows. “It’s completely defended, like in a capsule,” she said, so when the alarms sound, “We are like, What can we do? Let the rockets fly and we’ll dance. It’s a strange feeling.”

She still does volunteer work, locating drones, thermal vision goggles and vests. One part of her studio is essentially a storage facility. But recently she has started to think about how she could help in a more specific, perhaps even lasting way.

“I start to see how many traumas the soldiers have,” Shyshkarova said, “and it’s not about the bullet, not about bombs. It’s because they run too much and something goes wrong with the back. Or they turn, and something is wrong with the knees.”

She and her husband, Yaroslav Kaynar, also a dancer, choreographer and teacher, began to take courses in tactical training. And she studied YouTube videos about how to manage weapons and to move with greater efficiency. “There are mechanical and good body patterns or healthy body patterns,” Shyshkarova said. “This is what we have in contemporary dance — we learn this from childhood.”

To better train those in the military, Shyshkarova is creating a system that she calls “tactical choreography” and is developing it with Andrii Polyarush, a soldier who lost a hand in March.

“He wants to be useful,” she said. “He wants to go back to the battlefield. I said, ‘Come on, you don’t have a hand. How you can do it?’ Stay here. Help me.”

Using a combination of modern dance techniques and tactical training, the program will feature preparatory exercises for civilians and military personnel to create healthy movement habits. Sitting down, standing up, rolling over — without injuring any joints — are not as simple as they sound. And try adding to that body armor and ammunition.

“How to fall quickly,” she said. “How to move parallel to the floor or change the position of the body without letting go of the weapon and without losing focus on the enemy.”

Reading Lynn Garafola’s recent biography of Bronislava Nijinska, I sensed a connection between the grit of these contemporary dance artists and the innovative spirit of Nijinska, who developed her progressive ideas about movement and dance working in Kyiv, starting in 1915. The sister of the brilliant dancer Vaslav Nijinsky, Nijinska was a member of Diaghilev’s groundbreaking Ballets Russes. But it was in Kyiv, away from her former ballet life in Russia, that her radical movement theories were formed. She and her experimental colleagues were ahead of their time: For her, the arts could let go of narrative. Dance didn’t need music; the body could exist on its own.

Nijinska formed her School of Movement in Kyiv, but left the country in 1921 because of political pressures. (Ukraine’s prolific avant-garde period — of which theater was always more prominent than dance — came to an end in the 1930s, suppressed by Stalin.)

Ruban is invested in preserving Ukrainian dance and theater heritage; his work grows out of the embers not just of Nijinska — with Svitlana Oleksiuk, another dance artist, he created a lecture-performance about the choreographer — but also of that experimental period more broadly.

For Ruban, who recently presented a version of an older piece — he said he finds it easier to look at past work and adapt it to the current climate — now it is not the time to delve into a deep creative process. “It’s really hard to find the movement and dance language to speak about the situation,” he said. “We do things that are more vital at this point.”

One thing he has done is start the Ukrainian Emergency Performing Arts Fund to provide financial assistance to artists. He has also begun working with Liudmyla Mova, a choreographer, psychologist and professor, on a new program that helps people in the military cope with physical and mental stress. “We’ll be giving work on body structure and centering,” he said, as well as on grounding, balancing and “many other applicable things from somatic work.”

Somatic methods are not alien to the military. Katja Kolcio, a somatic movement educator and a professor of dance at Wesleyan University, helped to develop a program in somatic resiliency during war and has worked closely with Ukrainian war-relief workers, the Ukrainian National Guard, Ukrainian Armed Forces and veterans.

“Somatic practices combine movement exploration with reflection in order to deepen awareness by drawing on our own inner wisdom and resilience,” Kolcio said.

The lived experiences, memories and the culture of participants matter. Those practices, she continued, “are particularly effective in the context of this war on Ukraine because they draw on the very resources that Putin is aiming to eradicate — Ukrainian cultural history and knowledge, passed down through generations of Ukrainian experience.”

It is through the arts, she said, that Ukrainians have been able to maintain a sense of selfhood, even when books and language were banned, and performances and artwork censored by the Soviets (as well as by Russia, long before Soviet times):“It was such an explicit attempt to erase a sense of Ukrainian-ness,” she said, and yet that was preserved “through the embroidery, through the chants and songs and movements.”

She added, “And so I think being able to finally feel one’s selfhood, it’s a physical act.”

At Soma, an independent space for movement exploration in Lviv, led by Olha Marusyn, somatic classes are offered, including a morning preparation. The word preparation is intentional. “You really prepare yourself for something, for anything,” she said. “And then we try to work with the body-mind connection, with attention, with knowing where you’re situated and what you’re looking at and what’s happening around.”

But dancing as an art continues in Ukraine, too. This month, the All-Ukrainian Association Contemporary Dance Platform presents “Let the Body Speak,” featuring dance videos by Ukrainian choreographers. Anton Ovchinnikov, a founder of the platform and an established Ukrainian choreographer and festival organizer, said it is “a kind of archive of, as we say, body memory. The idea is to edit these videos until the end of the war.”

Ovchinnikov estimates that 70 percent to 75 percent of Ukrainian choreographers have left the country for other parts of Europe. “Let the Body Speak” features their voices, too. (It is supported by the British Council and the Ukrainian Institute, and created in collaboration with the Place, a London organization for dance.) “Our idea is not about presenting it in Ukraine, but abroad,” Ovchinnikov said, as a way to “represent Ukrainian contemporary dance.”

Not everyone thought it was a good idea. “There were a group of dancers who told us that now is not the time to present dance or dance videos,” he said.

But Ovchinnikov said everyone must decide for themselves whether to make dances now. “It’s very, very private,” he said. “It’s important that this decision should be outside of any of the opinions or restrictions.”

There is also the question of what Ukrainian contemporary dance is. Especially in this moment. Of course, there is still ballet and folk dance. (At the National Opera of Ukraine in Kyiv, ballet performances have resumed, though at a smaller scale until more dancers become available.) There are street dancers in Kyiv who raise money for war efforts. The contact improvisation scene in Kyiv was described to me as being strong and well organized — as much of a social club as a dancing community. Yet what some see as contemporary work is not avant-garde, but commercial dance more aligned to what you might see on the TV show “So You Think You Can Dance.”

What can dance, as an art form, mean under these circumstances? For the young choreographer Danylo Zubkov, who leads a group in Kyiv, Ukrainian contemporary dance can only be created now by dance artists living in the country since the Russian invasion on Feb. 24. And that means starting from scratch. As he sees it, now is the time for the birth of authentic, essential Ukrainian contemporary dance. To be an independent artist, he says, is about trying to create something new. “When you do not question yourself,” he said, “you cannot find it.”

He works regularly with his dancers, but it’s early days: He said he doesn’t have the words to describe his work now. But what he does know is that it has nothing to do with generating choreographic material for a show. He wants to usher in a new era of dance; to him, that’s what being an independent artist is all about. “And this new is not connected with anything,” he said. “Me and my friends are not making dance just as a way to forget about the reality. We are trying to save it as something more.”

Categories
Politics

Everytown for Gun Security to Prepare Volunteers to Run for Workplace

Gun control group Everytown for Gun Safety plans to spend $ 3 million to recruit and train its volunteers for the candidacy, with the goal of getting 200 races in the next election cycle.

The program is the latest step in a year-long effort by groups supporting stricter gun laws to become politically competitive with the National Rifle Association, which has a strong grip on American politics amid the rise in mass shootings.

That dynamic has started to shift as the NRA loses its hold on moderate Democrats and more gun restrictions are passed by state lawmakers. But even proposals with broad bipartisan support among voters, such as universal background checks and red flag laws, have failed in Congress.

Everytown’s new program, called Demand a Seat, will begin this fall and will include training on the fundamentals of running a campaign, as well as instruction from lawyers who have become legislators, such as Rep. Lucy McBath, Democrat of Georgia. It is aimed at members of Moms Demand Action and Students Demand Action, two branches of Everytown supported by Michael R. Bloomberg.

“Our volunteers have fought to have the people at the table listen to them, and some wouldn’t, so now our volunteers and gun violence survivors will be fighting to occupy those seats,” said Shannon Watts, founder of Moms Demand action.

Everytown said more than 100 of its volunteers ran for office last year and 43 won.

The group said more than 50 former volunteers were elected to state parliaments, 18 to city or district councils, eight to school boards, and two to Congress: Ms. McBath and Marie Newman, Democrats of Illinois.

Ms McBath, who was first elected in 2018, said in an interview on Monday that as a lawyer for Moms Demand Action, she learned how to organize people, give speeches and talk about politics with different audiences. But she said, “I had no idea how to campaign.”

“I’ve never run for office,” said Ms. McBath, who joined Moms Demand Action after her son Jordan Davis was fatally shot. “I got a bit of help from people around me and went to bootcamp training over a weekend, but I wish I had this kind of structure, an ongoing structure that I could relate to all the time.”

State Representative Jo Ella Hoye, a Democrat, was elected to the Kansas Legislature in November after leading the chapter of Moms Demand Action in Kansas for about three years. She said she mostly staffed her campaign with other volunteers making more than 10,000 calls for her.

“You have this lightbulb moment: I used this database for our organization and I will use it for our campaign. We attend training on messaging and social media, ”said Ms. Hoye. “If you formalize it, the lightbulb will click just a little earlier.”

You and Ms. McBath will advise the participants in the program, as will, among others, the Mayoress Keisha Lance Bottoms of Atlanta, a Democrat; former New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu, a Democrat; and former Florida MP David Jolly, who was Republican during his tenure but has since left the party.

Categories
Politics

Mexico sues U.S. gun producers, alleging they trigger huge harm to nation

Mexican soldiers guard a crime scene.

Guillermo arias | AFP | Getty Images

The Mexican government on Wednesday sued several US arms manufacturers for contributing to the illegal arms trade in Mexico.

The lawsuit was filed in US federal court in Boston. Among the defendants named in the lawsuit are Smith & Wesson, Barrett Firearms, Beretta USA, and Colt’s Manufacturing Company.

The companies did not immediately respond to CNBC’s requests for comment.

The arms manufacturers are accused of negligent business practices that facilitate the smuggling of arms to Mexico and cause “massive damage” to the country. The lawsuit alleges that they knowingly supply the criminal arms market in Mexico. Military-style companies’ weapons often end up in the hands of drug cartels and other criminals who harm civilians and government personnel.

Mexico has reported historically high murder rates in recent years, some of which in the lawsuit are attributable to the arms trade from the United States in violation of Mexican gun laws.

“The consequences in Mexico were dire. In addition to the exponential increase in the murder rate, the behavior of the defendants has had an overall destabilizing effect on Mexican society,” the lawsuit said.

The Mexican government is demanding compensation for the financial toll and bloodshed caused by the alleged wrongful conduct of the defendants. Mexican Foreign Minister Marcelo Ebrard said at a press conference on Wednesday that the government is targeting an estimated $ 10 billion, Reuters reported on Wednesday.

Mexico’s Secretary of State Marcelo Ebrard watches during a press conference to announce that Mexico has sued several arms manufacturers in a U.S. federal court accusing them of negligent business practices that resulted in the illegal arms trade that took place in Mexico in Mexico City, Mexico, on 4th, 2021.

Luis Cortes | Reuters

“For decades, the government and its citizens have been the victims of a deadly flood of military and other particularly lethal weapons that have passed from the United States across the border into criminal hands into Mexico,” the lawsuit said.

“This flood is not a natural phenomenon or an inevitable consequence of the gun business or US gun laws. It is the predictable result of the willful acts and business practices of the defendants, ”it said.

The compensation would cover, among other things, the cost of deaths and injuries to Mexican police and military personnel, social services for victims of gun crimes and their families, and strengthening law enforcement to prevent the gun trade, the lawsuit said.

Laws in Mexico severely restrict the sale of firearms, and the Mexican government issues fewer than 50 gun permits each year, according to the lawsuit.

But the defendants are undermining these laws, the lawsuit says. An estimated half a million weapons are smuggled into Mexico from the United States each year, and the defendants produce over 68% of them, the lawsuit said.

That means they sell more than 340,000 firearms to criminals annually, which flow across the U.S.-Mexico border, according to the lawsuit.

The lawsuit states that the defendants do not regulate their gun distribution practices. They sell guns to any distributor or dealer with a US license, regardless of whether they illegally sold guns to Mexico, the lawsuit says.

The defendants are also charged with marketing their weapons in a way that attracts transnational criminal organizations such as Mexican drug cartels. Barrett Firearms, for example, markets one of its rifles as a “weapon of war,” but sells it to the general public without restrictions, the lawsuit said.

The lawsuit alleges that it enabled criminals to attack the Mexican military and police, and increased extortion and kidnapping.

Ebrard on Wednesday urged U.S. arms manufacturers to end their business practices which he believes are contributing to violence and deaths in his country, Reuters reported. He said he believed the US government, not mentioned in the lawsuit, was ready to work with Mexico to curb the illegal arms trade.

Categories
Politics

How the A.T.F., Key to Biden’s Gun Plan, Turned an N.R.A. ‘Whipping Boy’

The mere presence of a permanent leader like Mr Chipman has the potential to be transformative, former agency officials said.

“I’ve never been the president’s man, and being the president’s person means people are less likely to push back against you,” said Mr. Brandon, the former interim director. “It gives you a lot more road credit.”

Mr. Chipman served as a special agent during a 22-year ATF career that ended in 2010, first in the hectic Detroit office, then in stations on the Interstate 95 corridor, the country’s largest illegal firearms canal, and in the headquarters of the office. There, he told The Trace website, he observed “the disastrous drawbacks of the gun lobby’s efforts to prevent the ATF from modernizing”.

Gabrielle Giffords, the former Arizona Congressman who became a gun control activist after being seriously wounded in an assassination attempt, pushed for Mr. Chipman’s hiring along with other gun security groups in mid-November, shortly after Biden was elected, according to several people with knowledge the situation.

But for weeks after the inauguration, the White House and its Senate allies paused, in part to save gun-friendly Democrats like West Virginia Senator Joe Manchin III from a tough vote as they focused on the pandemic and spending.

The shootings that killed 18 people in Atlanta and Boulder, Colorado in mid-March changed that.

Shortly thereafter, Mrs. Giffords wrote to Mr. Biden asking him to meet with her to discuss Mr. Chipman. By this point, Mr. Biden’s chief of staff Ron Klain had thrown his support behind Mr. Chipman, and Mr. Biden later said to Ms. Giffords that he was ready to fight for the nomination, according to an administrative officer with knowledge of the exchange.

Almost immediately, the NRA announced plans to spend $ 2 million to defeat Mr. Chipman and cut a complaint against Senator Susan Collins, a moderate Republican from Maine.

Categories
Politics

C.D.C. Funding Gun Violence Analysis For First Time in Many years

This was the argument he used to persuade Congress to spend reasonable money on research into gun violence in 2019. The research itself was never banned entirely, and in 2013, weeks after the massacre that killed 26 people at Connecticut’s Sandy Hook Elementary School, President Barack Obama directed the CDC to reconsider funding studies on gun violence.

The agency commissioned a report from the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council that set out the priorities, but that little changed. By 2019, after the Democrats took back the house, liberal organizations like MoveOn.org petitioned Congress to overturn the Dickey amendment. Almost every House Democrat has signed up.

Dr. However, Rosenberg argued that it should remain intact to “protect Republicans and gun-loving Democrats who can put money into science and tell their constituents,” This is not gun control money. “”

Representative Rosa DeLauro, a Connecticut Democrat who chaired the House subcommittee that oversees the CDC’s budget at the time, said she put $ 50 million into the budget bill this year, but that of the House Republican-controlled Senate got rid of it. The two chambers reached a compromise of $ 25 million, but they hoped to double the funding this year.

Dr. Naik-Mathuria, the Houston trauma surgeon, said she would like Washington to address gun violence as an issue of injury prevention rather than policy. She began researching methods of reducing gun violence about six years ago after seeing “Children walked in dead for shooting themselves in the head when they found a gun at home”.

Her current study aims to determine risk factors for gun violence in children and adults, and her previous work has led to some changes in medical practice, she said.

Pediatricians in Texas, she said, are reluctant to talk about gun safety, fearing that “it would upset parents or become political”. So she and her group made a broader security video that included gun safety news – like locking and storing guns – with tips on how to keep children out of poison.

Categories
Politics

White Home Weighs Govt Orders on Gun Management

WASHINGTON – With Congress unlikely to move quickly on guns legislation, the White House is pushing forward plans for a series of executive orders that President Biden is expected to put in place in the coming weeks to keep pressure on the issue.

A day after Mr Biden urged the Senate to pass a ban on assault weapons and step up background checks in response to two mass shootings last week that killed 18 people, White House officials said on Wednesday that the legislation was being passed Gun safety remained a goal; it would take time, given the vehement opposition from the Republicans.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki said laws were needed to make permanent changes. But she also suggested that the executive measures under consideration could be a realistic starting point.

“There is of course a lot of leverage that you can use as president and vice president,” she said.

At the moment, administrative officials have reached out to Senate Democrats to discuss three executive actions. One would classify so-called ghost guns as firearms – kits with which a weapon can be assembled from parts. Another would fund community violence intervention programs, and the third would strengthen the background control system, according to congressional assistants familiar with the talks.

The White House attorney’s office was aware that any executive action against guns will come with legal challenges and has also reviewed those actions to ensure they stand up to judicial review.

A White House spokesman declined to comment on the upcoming actions. But Mr Biden is under pressure from weapons security groups to act as quickly as possible.

“If there’s one thing we’ve been into over the past year, inaction costs lives,” said John Feinblatt, president of Everytown for Gun Safety, an organization dedicated to preventing gun violence. “It’s not about next week, it’s not about next month, it has to be about today. It has to be right now. “

During his campaign, Mr. Biden, a prominent proponent of the 10-year offensive weapons ban in 1994, promised to enact a general background check law banning all online firearms sales, and the manufacture and sale of assault weapons and magazines to ban high capacity.

But Mr Biden has acknowledged that he doesn’t know what legislation might be possible, even after the recent Atlanta and Boulder shootings. “I haven’t counted yet,” he said Tuesday when asked if he had the political capital to advance gun security measures.

With the National Rifle Association, once the most powerful lobby group in the country, which went bankrupt and spent more money on legal fees than fighting the White House or Congress, Mr Biden could have more room for maneuver.

Colorado shooting

Updated

March 24, 2021, 6:58 p.m. ET

Since the transition, officials in the Biden administration have met regularly with Mr. Feinblatt and other gun control advocates to discuss what actions are possible that do not require the cooperation of Congress.

Ideas they discussed include the Federal Trade Commission, which evaluates gun reports for false or misleading safety claims, the Education Department, which promotes measures to prevent students from gaining access to firearms, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that Gunshot wounds must ensure reliable data tracking.

They also discussed whether to make gun violence a public health emergency – a move that would free up more funds that could be used to support community gun violence programs and enforce applicable laws.

“The Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives Bureau has funds to inspect the average arms dealer every five years,” said Kris Brown, president of Brady: United Against Gun Violence, a nonprofit group. “We have more arms dealers than Starbucks and McDonald’s.”

Designating gun violence as a public health crisis, Ms. Brown said, would allocate more money to allow for more regular inspections. This is a proposal that has been shared with the Biden transition teams.

What to Know About Gun Laws and Shootings in the United States

“We also talked about what can be done by agencies like the Department of Health and Human Services to motivate the health community to focus on preventive measures that can stop gun violence before it starts,” Ms. Brown said .

At the moment, one of the government’s greatest efforts has been to classify “ghost rifles” as firearms. Such a classification would require that they be serialized and subjected to background checks.

The government has also spoken to Democratic senators about its upcoming plans to fund community-based violence intervention programs. How much money is still up for debate?

During the campaign, Mr. Biden pledged to launch an eight-year $ 900 million initiative to fund evidence-based interventions in 40 cities across the country.

“There are programs in this country that do a proven job,” Ms. Brown said. “But they are drastically underfunded. We want a $ 5 billion investment in such violence intervention programs across the country. “

White House officials described a “robust interagency process” but said the proposed executive action was still ongoing.

While there are no plans for impending legislative pressure on guns from a White House dealing with crises on multiple fronts, Mr Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris continued to call legislative action imperative.

“I am not ready to give up what we must do to speak to the hearts and minds and cause of the members of the United States Senate,” Ms. Harris said in an interview with CBS This Morning on Wednesday.

“It is time for Congress to act and stop making wrong decisions,” she said. “This is not about getting rid of the second amendment. The point is simply to say that we need adequate gun safety laws. There is no reason why we have assault weapons on the streets of a civil society. They are weapons of war. They are supposed to kill a lot of people quickly. “

Categories
Politics

The place Will the Gun Management Debate Go Now (if Anyplace)?

New York Times Podcasts

My experience with the interview with Senator Bernie Sanders is that you usually speak to someone who realizes that they are rowing against the tide of American politics. They usually talk about what he thinks the president should do but not, or what the Democratic Party should but not support.

But the American rescue plan was different. It’s President Biden’s bill, of course, but it’s the kind of thing Mr Sanders has been fighting to get passed for years. This also applies to the next package for full employment through investment. And so I wanted to hear what Mr. Sanders thought of that moment when he apparently lost the election but won many of the arguments.

So I asked him on my podcast, and I got a much more upbeat Mr. Sanders than I’ve ever spoken before. “Congress doesn’t pass perfect bills,” he told me. “But for workers, this is the most important law passed since the 1960s.”

We also talked about the filibuster, which went from being a supporter to being rejected even during the 2020 campaign. and the struggles over language and culture, in which he clearly has concerns about where liberals are headed and how difficult it is to speak to voters who might otherwise economically agree with them.

“These cultural problems,” he said, “I don’t know how to fill the gap.” But “somehow, in some cases, the intellectual elite have a disdain for the people who live in rural America,” he said, arguing that the first step in winning those voters back is to prove that you respect them.

It’s an interesting, thoughtful conversation with a politician who is finally rowing with the tide and obviously excited to see how far he can go. I hope You will be listening by following “The Ezra Klein Show” Anywhere you can get your podcasts or read the transcript here.

Categories
Politics

Senate Panel to Debate Gun Management After Two Mass Shootings

Senators quickly split by partisan standards on Tuesday as Democrats called for action after two mass shootings last week and Republicans denounced their calls to highlight the political divide that has fueled a decade-long cycle of inaction against gun violence.

At a Senate Justice Committee hearing scheduled ahead of the Atlanta and Boulder shootings that killed at least 18 people, Democrats argued that the recent slaughter left Congress with no choice but to issue stricter guidelines. They lamented the grim pattern of fear and outrage, followed by partisanship and paralysis that had become the norm after mass shootings.

“In addition to a moment of silence, I would like to invite a moment of action,” said Senator Dick Durbin, Democrat of Illinois and chairman of the committee. “A moment of real care. A moment when we don’t allow others to do what we have to do. Prayer leaders have an important place here, but we are Senate leaders. What do we do?”

Even before the recent shootings, the Democrats had begun to push for stricter arms control measures, which face great opportunities in the 50:50 Senate. House Democrats passed two bills this month aimed at expanding and strengthening background checks on gun buyers by applying them to all gun buyers and extending the time it takes for the FBI to review those flagged by the national emergency inspection system.

But the two laws passed in the House were deemed too expansive by most Republicans – only eight Republicans in the House voted to push universal background scrutiny legislation. The bills would almost certainly not get the 60 votes required to clear a filibuster in the Senate.

Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, the top Republican on the panel, said in his opening address he was confident that Democrats and Republicans could work together to make “bipartisan, sensible” progress on gun control. But he said that the legislation passed by the House did not fit this bill as the measures would be passed almost entirely on a party-political basis.

“That’s not a good sign that all voices and perspectives are being considered,” said Grassley.

Senator Ted Cruz, Republican of Texas, went further, slapping Senator Richard Blumenthal, Democrat of Connecticut, who said Republicans had offered “fig leaves” rather than actionable, meaningful gun control solutions.

“Every time there is shooting, we play this ridiculous theater where this committee comes together and proposes a number of laws that do nothing against these murders,” said Cruz. “But what they suggest – not only does it not reduce crime, it makes it worse.”

The renewed focus on gun control is expected to return attention to Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia, who speaks out against the downsizing of the legislative filibuster but has long – unsuccessfully – endeavored to propose a bipartisan Say goodbye to gun control. Following the 2012 massacre of Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, Mr. Manchin signed a contract with Senator Pat Toomey, Republican of Pennsylvania, to fill legal loopholes that would allow people to buy firearms at gun shows or on the Internet , allow background checks to be avoided, but proponents could not muster enough support to pass them.

Mr Manchin told CQ Roll Call earlier this month that he was speaking out against the General Background Review Bill passed by the House, citing its provision citing checks for individual sales, but said he was in favor of a legislative revival from Manchin-Toomey interested.

Categories
Politics

Man arrested close to Kamala Harris residence, gun and ammunition discovered

A Texas man wanted by the police was stopped by US intelligence and arrested on Wednesday afternoon near the Washington residence of Vice President Kamala Harris.

Police found a rifle, a large amount of ammunition, and several gun clips in a car owned by 31-year-old Paul Murray of San Antonio after telling them it was parked in a garage several miles away near the Washington Convention center, according to NBC 4.

That black Chevy Impala also had what the police called a large capacity ammunition feeder.

A police report stated that Murray was in possession of “an AR-15 semi-automatic rifle, 113 rounds of unregistered ammunition and five 30-round magazines.”

Murray was stopped around noon by intelligence officials in northwest Washington on Massachusetts Avenue, just outside the Naval Observatory where Harris’ residence is located.

A person arrested by the Secret Service at the Vice President’s residence in Washington DC.

penguinsix | Youtube

Police said they arrested Murray in response to a Texas intelligence bulletin.

The Vice President and her husband Doug Emhoff do not currently reside at the Naval Observatory as the residence is currently under renovation. The couple live in Blair House near the White House.

Murray was accused of carrying a dangerous weapon, rifle or shotgun outside of a store, possession of unregistered ammunition, and a large capacity ammunition feeder.

Andrew Leyden, a former Capitol Hill employee who lives near the Naval Observatory, told CNBC that he witnessed the arrest when he stopped by on a scooter on his way to the Irish embassy to watch a St. Patrick’s Day video to shoot for his YouTube channel.

“A couple of policemen passed me at the National Cathedral,” Leyden said. “What was really strange was that they were marked units and unmarked units.”

A video Leyden recorded of the scene showed Murray surrounded by police officers with a bicycle in the nearby grass.

“I saw this shaggy looking guy tied up,” said Leyden, who posted a video of the scene on Twitter.

Harris’ spokeswoman Sabrina Singh referred CNBC to the Secret Service when asked for comment.

Categories
Politics

Biden calls on Congress to reform gun legal guidelines on anniversary of Parkland capturing

President Joe Biden speaks as he meets with senators from both parties at the White House on February 11, 2021.

Doug Mills-Pool / Getty Images

President Joe Biden on Sunday called on Congress to tighten gun laws on the third anniversary of the mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida.

“Today as we mourn with the Parkland community, we mourn all those who lost loved ones to gun violence,” Biden said in a statement released by the White House.

The president called for several provisions, including background checks of all arms sales, a ban on offensive weapons and high-capacity magazines, and the lifting of immunity from arms manufacturers.

“This government will not wait for the next mass shootings to respond to this call. We will take steps to end our gun violence epidemic and make our schools and communities safer,” said Biden. “We owe it to everyone we have lost and everyone who has been left behind to grieve in order to change something.”

Fourteen students and three staff were killed in the Parkland shootings. The student survivors started the March for Our life movement in support of the gun legislation.

Spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Said in a statement on Sunday that Congress would work with the Biden administration to pass two background check laws. The House passed the bipartisan background check law and the extended background check law during the last Congress.

“On this solemn remembrance, Democrats join the American people in renewing our commitment to our unfinished work and to ensure that no family or community is forced to endure the pain of gun violence,” Pelosi said. “We will not rest until all Americans, in schools, at work, in places of worship, and in our communities are safe once and for all.”

Susan Rice, chair of the White House Home Affairs Council, and Cedric Richmond, a senior adviser to Biden, hosted a virtual meeting with leaders of gun violence prevention advocacy groups last week to discuss how gun violence can be reduced.