Categories
Business

China says retail gross sales grew 17.7% in April, lacking expectations

A worker uses a thermometer to check a customer’s temperature as they enter a Starbucks store while the country is hit by the new coronavirus outbreak in Beijing, China on Jan. 30, 2020.

A worker uses a thermometer to check a customer’s temperature as they enter a Starbucks store while the country is hit by the new coronavirus outbreak in Beijing, China on Jan. 30, 2020.

BEIJING – As the latest sign of a sluggish recovery from the coronavirus pandemic, China said on Monday that consumer spending grew more slowly than expected in April.

Retail sales rose 17.7% year over year last month, the National Bureau of Statistics said on Monday. According to analysts polled by Reuters, this fell short of expectations of 24.9% growth in April.

Retail sales in April also slowed from 34.2% year over year in March.

“China is still experiencing an unbalanced recovery as employment, household income, consumption, manufacturing investment, the service sector and private businesses have not yet returned to pre-pandemic levels,” Bruce Pang, director of macro and strategic research at China Renaissance, said in one Explanation.

Catering sales, which also include restaurants, rose 46.4% year over year in April from 91.6% in March.

Online sales of consumer goods rose 23.1% year over year in the first four months of the year, slower than the growth rate of 25.8% in the first three months of the year. The statistics bureau has not published any growth rates for a month.

In a quarterly monetary policy report released last week, the People’s Bank of China noted that the foundation for economic recovery is not yet solid and consumer spending remains constrained.

The urban unemployment rate fell from 5.3% in March to 5.1% in April, but the average number of hours worked fell from 46.9 hours in March to 46.4 hours last month.

Consumption has left China’s macroeconomic recovery from the coronavirus pandemic behind. Retail sales declined last year despite the expansion of China’s GDP – the only major economy that grew last year.

“The travel, leisure, and entertainment sectors are a busy place for a lot of people,” said Zhiwei Zhang, chief economist at Pinpoint Asset Management, in a note. “The uncertainty of Covid is still holding these sectors back.

“Economic growth is likely to have peaked quarter over quarter in the first quarter,” he said, reckoning that growth will slow in the coming months and that the likelihood of a rate hike by the central bank has decreased.

In yet another sign of persistent consumption weakness, Chinese tourist travel surged to a record high during the May 1-5 holidays, but spending was still below 2019 levels.

Other April numbers showed steady growth in non-consumer sectors.

Industrial production rose 9.8% in April, in line with Reuters’ expectations.

Fixed investment rose 19.9% ​​in the first four months of the year, slightly above the 19% forecast by a Reuters survey.

Categories
World News

China’s Census Reveals Inhabitants Barely Grew in 10 Years as Births Plummet

China’s population has grown the slowest since the 1960s, with births declining and a graying workforce presenting the Communist Party with one of its greatest social and economic challenges.

Figures for a census conducted last year and released Tuesday showed the country has 1.41 billion people, about 72 million more than that 1.34 billion, which was counted in the last census in 2010.

According to Ning Jizhe, head of China’s National Bureau of Statistics, only 12 million babies were born in China last year. This is the fourth year in a row that births in the country have fallen. This is the lowest official birth rate since 1961, when a famine caused by Communist Party policies killed millions of people and only 11.8 million babies were born.

The figures show that China is facing a demographic crisis that could slow the growth of the world’s second largest economy. China faces age-related challenges similar to those of developed countries, but its households, on average, live on much lower incomes than the US and elsewhere.

In other words, the country is getting old without first getting rich.

“Aging has become a fundamental national condition in China for a while,” Ning said at a press conference at which the census results were announced.

China’s population problems could force Xi Jinping, the country’s leader, to reckon with the flaws in the ruling Communist Party’s family planning policy, which for decades has been a major cause of public discontent in the country. If the trend continues unabated, it risks complicating Mr. Xi’s “Chinese Dream,” a promise of the long-term economic prosperity and national rejuvenation on which he has placed his legacy.

Beijing is now under greater pressure to abandon its family planning policies, which are among the most intrusive in the world. Revising an economic model that has long been based on a huge population and a growing pool of workers; and fill yawning gaps in health care and pensions.

“China is facing a unique demographic challenge that is the most urgent and severe in the world,” said Liang Jianzhang, research professor of applied economics at Beijing University and a demographic expert. “This is a long-term time bomb.”

The new population puts the average annual growth rate over the past ten years at 0.53 percent after 0.57 percent from 2000 to 2010. India, as the most populous nation in the world, is well on the way to being surpassed in the coming years.

The results of the census once a decade also showed that the population is aging rapidly. People over 65 make up 13.5 percent of the population today, up from 8.9 percent in 2010. When they were younger, that population was one of China’s greatest strengths.

For decades, China relied on an endless stream of young workers willing to work for low wages to fuel economic growth. Labor costs are rising today, partly due to labor shortages. Factory owners in the southern city of Guangzhou stand on the streets asking staff to choose them. Some companies have turned to robots because they cannot find enough workers.

While most industrialized countries in the west and Asia are also aging, China’s demographic problems are largely self-inflicted. China imposed a one-child policy in 1980 to curb population growth. Local officials enforced it with sometimes draconian measures. It may have prevented 400 million births, according to government figures, but it has also reduced the number of women of childbearing age due to cultural preferences for boys.

As the population ages it will put tremendous pressure on the country’s overburdened hospitals and underfunded pension system. China continues to grapple with a huge surplus of single men, which has created problems like the bride trade, an unintended consequence of its family planning rules.

These trends are difficult to reverse. Three decades after the one-child policy was introduced, attitudes towards family size have changed and many Chinese now only prefer one child.

Wang Feng, a professor of sociology at the University of California at Irvine, compared China’s birth control to a mortgage the government took out on their future.

“The census results will confirm that the payback time is now,” Professor Wang, an expert on China’s demographic trends, said before the results were released. “Demographics will limit many of China’s ambitious endeavors.”

The census could lead policymakers to further relax family planning restrictions, which have been eased since 2016 to restrict couples to two children. Many local governments already allow families to have three or more children without paying fines.

However, demographers say there are no easy solutions. A growing cohort of educated Chinese women is postponing marriage, which has been declining since 2014. China is unwilling to rely on immigration to strengthen its population. The divorce rate has increased steadily since 2003. Many millennials are put off by the cost of raising children.

In southwestern Chengdu, Tracy Wang, the 29-year-old founder of an English children’s enrichment center, said she decided in her early twenties that she didn’t want to have children.

“Basically, I don’t like children very much – yes, they may be cute – but I don’t want to give birth to them or take care of them,” Ms. Wang said.

“Before, a lot of people thought it was such an incredulous thought, ‘How can you even think like that?'” She said. “But now everyone understands that you can’t afford it.”

In the coming decades, Beijing will face the daunting task of sustaining strong economic growth and remaining globally competitive as the labor pool shrinks.

“China’s economy may not overtake that of the US as the largest economy in the foreseeable future.” said Julian Evans-Pritchard, a senior Chinese economist at Capital Economics, a research firm. “And the main reason for that is demographic differences.”

China is also maturing much faster than most countries, a rate that is rapidly outpacing the government’s meager investment in health and social services for an older population. A key challenge for Beijing is to help the country’s younger generation look after the growing number of retirees. People under the age of 14 made up 18 percent of the population, up from 17 percent 10 years ago.

The government wants to raise the retirement age, which is 60 for men and 50 for most women, among the lowest in the world, to ease pressure on the underfunded pension system. China’s largest state pension fund, which relies on tax revenues from its workforce, runs the risk of running out of money by 2036 if policies remain unchanged, according to a study commissioned by the party.

However, when people work longer hours their own problems arise and opposition to delaying retirement is widespread. Many young Chinese adults fear that such a move would make it harder for them to find work, and those with children fear that if they cannot retire, they will not be able to rely on their parents for childcare. Some older adults fear that it will be difficult for them to find or keep jobs in a society where younger workers are often preferred.

Elsie Chen contributed to the coverage. Claire Fu contributed to the research.

Categories
Business

Hershey tracked Covid traits after seeing s’mores demand rise as circumstances grew, CEO says

Hershey sees strong demand for chocolates and seasonal sweets as people are locked in their homes looking for every small occasion to celebrate.

“Throughout the year, the season was a major driver as consumers really wanted the comfort and normalcy associated with seasonal traditions and rituals at a time when Covid was uprooting their lives,” said Michele Buck, CEO of Hershey, in an interview with Sara from CNBC on Thursday, ironed about “Closing Bell.”

A notable example was a trend Hershey spotted when coronavirus cases increased across the country, demand for s’mores ingredients increased. Families no doubt sought fun by setting up barbecues in their backyards and roasting S’Mores over the fire. According to Hershey, chocolate sales were 40% to 50% higher in areas with increased numbers of Covid-19 cases than in areas with lower cases.

“Over the past year we have found that wherever the number of Covid cases has increased, there has been higher sales of s’mores ingredients. We were then able to use the case number as a harbinger of where we were doing some of that effort should focus and build shows and places media in these markets, “said Buck.

Retailers are also familiar with the trends and stocked up on Valentine’s Day and Easter candy sooner than ever to ensure they have plenty of choice.

Hershey stock closed Thursday less than 1% at $ 147.22 after sales rose 5.7% to $ 2.19 billion in the fourth quarter. Net income increased 41% to $ 291.4 million. Excluding items, Hershey earned $ 1.49 per share, beating analysts’ estimates.

Categories
Business

U.S. Financial system Grew 1 P.c within the Final Quarter: Stay Updates

Here’s what you need to know:

Gross domestic product, adjusted for inflation and seasonality, at annual rates

Gross domestic product, adjusted for inflation

and seasonality, at annual rates

The U.S. economic recovery stumbled but didn’t collapse at the end of last year, setting the stage for a much stronger rebound this year.

Gross domestic product rose 1 percent in the final three months of 2020, the Commerce Department said Thursday. That represented a sharp slowdown from the previous quarter, when business reopenings led to a record 7.5 percent growth rate. On an annualized basis, G.D.P. increased 4 percent in the fourth quarter, down from 33.4 percent in the third.

Looking at the quarter as a whole obscures the full extent of the slump: Many analysts believe economic output declined outright in November and December, as rising coronavirus cases and waning government aid led consumers to pull back on spending and forced businesses to shut down, in some cases for good.

But four weeks into January, the new year looks different. Aid passed by Congress in December has begun to flow in enhanced unemployment benefits, small-business loans and direct payments to households. Two runoff elections in Georgia delivered Democratic control of the Senate, making further rounds of assistance more likely. And the rollout of coronavirus vaccines, though slower than hoped, offers the prospect that hotels, bars and other businesses hurt by the pandemic will see customers return later this year.

“That fiscal stimulus is helping push the train of the economy through the tunnel, and the light on the other side is widespread vaccination and inoculation,” said Nela Richardson, chief economist at the payroll processing firm ADP.

The late-year slump was driven by a slowdown in consumer spending. Spending grew less than 1 percent in the fourth quarter, compared with 9 percent in the third. But parts of the economy that are less exposed to the pandemic helped pick up the slack. The housing market continued to surge, partly because of low interest rates, and business investment was strong, a sign of confidence among corporate leaders.

The economy is still in a significant hole. Measured against the final quarter of 2019, G.D.P. ended 2020 down 2.5 percent, making it the second-worst calendar year on record after a 2.8 percent contraction in 2008. Comparing 2020’s output over all with the previous year’s, G.D.P. fell 3.5 percent, the worst on record. The economy has regained roughly three-quarters of the output lost during the collapse last spring, and only a bit more than half of the jobs.

Cumulative percent change in

G.D.P. from the start of the

last five recessions

Final quarter

before

recession

4 quarters

into recession

Cumulative percent change in G.D.P.

from the start of the last five recessions

Final quarter

before

recession

4 quarters

into recession

Still, the rebound has been significantly stronger than most forecasters expected last spring. In May, economists at the Congressional Budget Office estimated that G.D.P. would end the year down 5.6 percent and wouldn’t reach its pre-pandemic level until well into 2022. Now, most forecasters expect it to hit that benchmark this year.

Last year’s overall showing was “bad but not historically bad, and not as bad as what was experienced in the Great Recession, and not nearly as bad as what was expected midyear,” said Jason Furman, a Harvard economist who ran the Council of Economic Advisers under President Barack Obama.

The stronger-than-expected rebound is partly a reflection of businesses’ flexibility — retailers embraced online sales, restaurants built outdoor patios, and factories reorganized production lines to allow for social distancing. But it is also a result of trillions of dollars in federal aid, which kept households and small businesses afloat when much of the economy was shut down.

“The fiscal stimulus package was not perfect,” said Stephanie Aaronson, an economist at the Brookings Institution. “But the truth is both Congress and the Fed acted very, very quickly, and I think that did save the economy from a much worse outcome.”

An outdoor dining area under construction at a San Diego restaurant after California relaxed restrictions on gathering in the latest phase of the pandemic.Credit…Ariana Drehsler for The New York Times

New claims for unemployment fell last week, the government reported on Thursday, but the elevated levels are fueling worries about prolonged damage inflicted on the labor market by the pandemic and the slow rollout of vaccines.

A total of 873,966 workers filed first-time claims for state unemployment benefits for the week that ended Jan. 23, the Labor Department said, while an additional 426,856 new claims were filed under a federal pandemic jobless program that covers freelancers, part-time workers and others normally ineligible for state jobless benefits. Neither figure is seasonally adjusted. On a seasonally adjusted basis, new state claims totaled 847,000.

The figures for newly filed claims are below the staggering levels of last spring, when the coronavirus started its march across the map, but they continue to dwarf previous records.

The impact of the virus on the service sector, particularly leisure and hospitality, is extracting the heaviest toll. “We need the service sector to come back for the economy more broadly to come back,” said Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics.

Although the Conference Board reported on Tuesday that consumer confidence edged up in January, views of the labor market’s current health dropped. The percentage of respondents saying jobs are “plentiful” declined, and the share saying that “jobs are hard to get” rose.

“Everything goes back to the health crisis,” Ms. Farooqi said, “Once you get most of the population vaccinated, that’s a completely different picture.”

The $900 billion pandemic relief bill signed into law last month has provided a bridge of support, but provisions specifically extending relief to jobless workers are scheduled to expire in mid-March.

President Biden has proposed a $1.9 trillion emergency relief package that includes a $400 weekly unemployment insurance supplement, although Republicans and a handful of Democratic lawmakers have balked at the cost of the overall proposal.

Isaac Curtis, left, picked up donations at a food bank in Augusta, Maine, on Wednesday. Mr. Curtis interviewed for a job earlier in the day.Credit…Tristan Spinski for The New York Times

Job recruiters are accustomed to seeing a pattern in late January: When the holiday crush and seasonal gigs end, job-hunting surges. But not this year.

The demand is there, but many of the job seekers aren’t, said Julia Pollak, a labor economist with the hiring site ZipRecruiter.

“In our marketplace over the past three weeks, employer activity has been completely exuberant, it has surpassed our forecasts,” Ms. Pollak said. But the ranks of “job seekers are way, way, way lower than usual.”

Some have argued that generous jobless benefits are discouraging people from working. But Ms. Pollak disagrees, saying the main reason for the low number of applications is the continuing fallout from the coronavirus pandemic.

“Many people who should be looking for jobs aren’t even eligible for benefits, like millions of women who left the labor market for child care,” she said. And some are staying home because of other family responsibilities, or out of concern about getting sick if they re-enter the work force, particularly with the arrival of a more infectious coronavirus strain, she said.

Ernie Tedeschi, an economist and head of fiscal analysis at Evercore ISI, described the labor market as “treading water right now.”

The pandemic and the cold winter months in parts of the country continue to hobble the economy’s recovery, he said, and vaccine distribution has been too slow to have much effect.

At ZipRecruiter, the strongest demand for jobs can be found in delivery services, e-commerce, big-box and grocery stores and warehouse clubs as well as tax preparation, mortgage origination and home building.

Industries like hospitality, leisure, travel and others that involve face-to-face contact have incurred the biggest job losses, but in one way that lopsidedness is reassuring, Mr. Tedeschi said. Those are businesses that one would expect to be down because of the pandemic. It would be more worrying if the weakness had spread throughout the labor market, a sign of longer-term scarring in the economy, he said.

American lost nearly $8.9 billion in 2020, which its chief executive, Doug Parker, described as “the most challenging year in our company’s history.Credit…Lindsey Wasson for The New York Times

American Airlines, Southwest Airlines and JetBlue Airways reported steep annual losses on Thursday, joining industry peers in closing the books on a merciless year for aviation.

American lost nearly $8.9 billion in 2020, which its chief executive, Doug Parker, described as “the most challenging year in our company’s history.” JetBlue shed almost $1.4 billion and Southwest nearly $3.1 billion, its first annual loss since 1972.

“The Covid-19 pandemic challenged our industry in ways we have never seen before,” Robin Hayes, JetBlue’s chief executive, said in a statement.

The airline industry’s hopes now rest on the distribution of the coronavirus vaccine, but none of the airlines expect a rebound to materialize soon. In fact, Southwest expects to incur higher daily losses in January and February than it did in the final three months of 2020 because of a seasonal decline in travel and the rising cost of fuel.

Southwest said it also expected revenues to be down between 65 and 70 percent in January and February compared to a year earlier. American said it expected revenues to be down 60 to 65 percent in the first three months of 2021 compared to the same period in 2019. JetBlue forecast a similar decline.

Operating revenues for 2020 were down about 63 percent for Southwest and 65 percent for both American and JetBlue compared to 2019. Southwest said it ended the year with about $13.3 billion in easily accessible cash and short-term investments, while American had nearly $14.3 billion and JetBlue about $3.1 billion.

Southwest also said that it expects to start flying Boeing’s 737 Max on March 11, just over two years after the plane was grounded worldwide following two fatal crashes. The Federal Aviation Administration lifted its ban on the jet in November and has since been followed by regulators in Brazil, Canada and Europe.

The trio of financial results on Thursday came a day after Boeing reported a $11.9 billion loss in 2020, its worst year ever. Earlier this month, United Airlines reported a $7 billion annual loss and Delta Air Lines a loss of over $12 billion. At the time, Delta’s chief executive called 2020 the “toughest year” in the carrier’s history, and United’s chief executive said the pandemic had “changed United Airlines forever.”

After a tumultuous day on Wednesday, futures markets indicated New York trading would open with a measure of calm on Thursday. The S&P 500 was set to open little changed following the worst single-day drop since October.

European markets opened lower before recovering some of their losses, and Asian stock markets closed in the red. This week, traders have been unnerved by the gloomy short-term outlook for the global economy and the havoc caused by speculative trading in other corners of the market.

Investors are facing a host of concerns, which has increased volatility. There is uncertainty about whether the market can sustain its relentless rise of recent months, and whether asset bubbles were starting to form. They also worried about whether the Biden administration would be able to quickly pass an ambitious stimulus spending program or be forced to pare it back to get a bill through a closely contested Senate.And investors are watching the pace of the coronavirus vaccine rollout, wary of delays that could push back the economic recovery around the world.

“The assumption was by the time we got to midyear we were fully back to normal and that’s being questioned,” said Karen Ward, a strategist at J.P. Morgan Asset Management.

“The whole timeline of vaccine rollout and that point of normality is going back a few months,” she said. “The markets are pretty comfortable waiting as long as they know that in the economic cost that’s incurred in the interim is absorbed by governments.”

Unease also stemmed from the shocking run-up in shares of companies with big brand names but uncertain prospects, like GameStop, the video game retailer; AMC, the movie theater chain; and BlackBerry, once the maker of hand-held devices that no financial professional would leave the office without. The surge pointed to frothy conditions in financial markets, suggesting a bunch of amateurs investors could take the reins and force steep losses on established hedge funds.

Investors who had bet that these stocks would perform poorly were taking losses at a steep cost brought on by a group of traders cheering each other on in a Reddit forum for picking stocks. Point72, the hedge fund run by Steve Cohen, the billionaire hedge fund manager and owner of the New York Mets baseball team, has lost nearly 15 percent this year, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

Regulators stepped in to say that they were watching the situation. In premarket trading on Thursday, shares in GameStop rose again. Naked Brand, a clothing retailer, was one of the most heavily traded stocks in premarket trading, up more 70 percent after being cited in a Reddit forum.

Elsewhere, investors moved money into traditionally safe assets. Yields on U.S. Treasury bonds fell back toward 1 percent as prices rose.

  • The Stoxx Europe 600 was down 0.7 percent.

  • The FTSE 100 in Britain fell 1 percent, the DAX in Germany was down 0.6 percent, and the CAC 40 in France was 0.2 percent lower.

  • In Japan, the Nikkei 225 index tumbled 1.5 percent.

  • China-related stocks also suffered. The Shanghai Composite Index fell 1.9 percent, while Hong Kong shares were down 2.6 percent.

GameStop One-Week Share Price

GameStop’s shares were one of the most actively traded stocks in premarket trading on Thursday as amateur traders continue to drive it higher, while collectively taking on some of Wall Street’s most sophisticated investors. They’ve piled into trades around companies — big and small — that other investors had written off, pushing stock prices to stratospheric levels.

The main focus is GameStop, the troubled video game retailer. Its stock is up about 40 percent in premarket trading, a much more moderate gain after trading platforms placed restrictions on the stock. But it’s already up 1,700 percent this month, including Wednesday’s climb of 135 percent, that has given the company an astonishing market valuation of $24 billion. AMC Entertainment rose 300 percent on Wednesday, and BlackBerry is up more than 275 percent this month.

Billions of shares were traded in Naked Brand, a clothing manufacturer, on Wednesday. Its share price rose from 39 cents to $1.38, a 252 percent gain. It was again one of the most traded stocks in premarket on Thursday, rising 110 percent, after being cited on a Reddit forum. The company had been trying to orchestrate its own turnaround and escape “penny stock” status to avoid being delisted.

The surging shares have become detached from the factors that traditionally help establish a company’s value to investors — like growth potential or profits. But the traders who are piling in probably aren’t thinking about those fundamentals.

Instead, they are part of a frenzy that appears to have originated on a Reddit message board, WallStreetBets, a community known for irreverent market discussions, and on messaging platforms like Discord. (One comment from WallStreetBets read, “PUT YOUR LIFTOFF DIAPERS ON ITS ABOUT TO START.”) Both Tesla’s Elon Musk and the billionaire tech investor Chamath Palihapitiya have encouraged the crowd via Twitter.

Egged on by the message boards, these traders are rushing to buy options contracts that will profit from a rise in the share price. And that trading can create a feedback loop that drives the underlying share prices higher, as brokerage firms that sell the options have to buy shares as a hedge.

As more traders snap up options, the brokers have to buy up more shares, driving the astounding rise in the company’s stock prices. GameStop began the year at $19 and ended trading on Wednesday at nearly $348.

Another reason the shares are rising so quickly is that, until recently, they were heavily targeted by big investors who bet the stocks would decline by taking on short positions. As the shares surge, the shorters also have to buy the stock in order to cut their losses, and that triggers a so-called short squeeze — a sudden spike in a share’s value.

Gabe Plotkin, the hedge fund trader whose Melvin Capital was shorting GameStop, confirmed to CNBC on Wednesday that he had exited his position after having to raise a $2.75 billion bailout from Citadel and his former boss, Steve Cohen, amid the short squeeze. Mr. Plotkin’s other short bets appear to be suffering, possibly because they are being targeted by traders — Melvin and Mr. Plotkin are often pilloried on the message boards.

The Securities and Exchange Commission said Wednesday it is “actively monitoring” the volatile trading.

Point72, Steve Cohen’s hedge fund, has an investment in Melvin Capital, which maintained a big bet against GameStop.Credit…Sasha Arutyunova for The New York Times

As shares of GameStop, the video game retailer, have surged amid a wave of speculative investment by small investors, Point72, the hedge fund run by the Mets owner Steve Cohen, has lost nearly 15 percent this year, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

GameStop’s sudden rally — the shares jumped 135 percent on Wednesday alone and are up more than 1,700 percent this year — has taken a toll on some large investors who had bet against the stock. The losses at Point72, which manages nearly $19 billion in assets, stem in part from the firm’s investment in Melvin Capital, a hedge fund that had a massive bet against GameStop.

As the shares rose, Melvin was saddled with sudden losses and had to accept $2.75 billion in rescue capital from two outside investors. One of the rescuers was Point72, which already had roughly $1 billion under management with Melvin, said two people with knowledge of the relationship, and added $750 million to help stabilize Melvin this week.

Because Melvin was investing money on Point72’s behalf, Point72’s results have also been hurt by the recent turmoil, said those people.

Point72’s losses are the first clear indication of the ripple of effect of Melvin’s recent troubles, which have been a cause of concern for both Wall Street and the baseball community. Stocks faced their worst performance since October on Wednesday in part because investors are worried that other large funds could be facing losses as well.

And late Tuesday night, Mr. Cohen faced questions on Twitter over the potential impact of the Melvin losses on the Mets, which he purchased for about $2.5 billion in November.

“Why would one have anything to do with the other,” Mr. Cohen replied in a post on Twitter.

A spokesman for Mr. Cohen said he was not available for comment.

Andrea Enria, the head of the European Central Bank’s bank supervision arm, said there were signs that commercial lenders were ignoring signs of a potential spike in problem loans.Credit…Armando Babani/EPA, via Shutterstock

The European Central Bank on Thursday effectively warned eurozone banks to clean up their acts, saying that many are complacent about losses they may suffer from a surge in problem loans caused by the pandemic.

The central bank, which has ultimate supervisory authority over commercial banks in the 19 countries that belong to the eurozone, also said that top managers at many lenders were not doing a good job of overseeing their operations and that many banks lacked a clear plan to address chronically weak profits.

No large European banks have failed since the pandemic hit. That is largely because after the financial crisis a decade ago, regulators forced lenders to reduce risk and increase their ability to absorb losses.

But in its annual report on the health of eurozone banks, the European Central Bank said that risks to banks remained high, especially as government support programs begin to run out.

Andrea Enria, the head of the European Central Bank’s bank supervision arm, said there was evidence that commercial banks are deliberately ignoring signs that problem loans could spike once emergency measures expire. He pointed to rules that allow companies and individuals to delay loan repayments.

Banks are required to set aside money to cover loans that are likely to default. But these provisions cut into profits and banks often try to keep these reserves as low as they can get away with. Mr. Enria said that provisions for problem loans in Europe were lower than in the United States and other countries, a sign that banks may be systematically underestimating risk.

“Asset quality deterioration remains our main concern for 2021,” Mr. Enria said at a news conference.

He also expressed concern that eurozone banks are loading up on leveraged loans, packages of high-risk credit to businesses that have invited comparison to the mortgage-backed securities that led to the 2008 financial crisis.

Without naming any bank, the European Central Bank criticized managers for “insufficient follow-up and oversight of business functions.” It also said banks were not doing enough to rectify the fact that most of them are barely profitable, if at all.

Mr. Enria urged banks to consider mergers as a way to address the overcrowded European banking market, and said that they need to do more to reduce costs.

“Staff cuts will be absolutely necessary,” he said.

Eric Bolling with Melania Trump. Mr. Bolling was hired by Sinclair TV in 2019.Credit…Ethan Miller/Getty Images

Eric Bolling, a former Fox News personality whose weekly talk show for the Sinclair Broadcast Group showcased his friendly relationship with former President Donald J. Trump, is leaving the broadcasting network, he said on Wednesday.

Mr. Bolling said that he planned to return to television shortly, but that he would wait to share details about his new job until after his Sinclair program, “America This Week,” ends on Saturday. He is also starting a podcast next month with the former Green Bay Packers quarterback Brett Favre.

Hired by Sinclair in 2019 to expand its current-affairs programming, Mr. Bolling was one of a handful of conservative-leaning hosts granted interviews with Mr. Trump during his tenure in the White House. His show aired on Sinclair stations in dozens of local markets.

Sinclair gained attention for mandating that its affiliates air segments from pro-Trump commentators, including a former Trump campaign aide, Boris Epshteyn. In October, Sinclair was forced to edit an episode in which Mr. Bolling spread misinformation about the coronavirus and questioned the utility of lockdowns and face masks.

“Eric has decided to pursue other professional opportunities,” Sinclair said in a statement on Wednesday. “We wish Eric the best in his future endeavors.”

Mr. Bolling was a co-host of “The Five” on Fox News. He left the network in 2017 after denying allegations that he had sent lewd messages to colleagues. He later became a prominent national advocate for curbing opioid abuse after the death of his son, who had taken a pill laced with fentanyl.

It’s called a short squeeze, and it involves investors betting on which way a stock will go — up or down. These bets are placed by buying stock options, and the options allow an investor to make money even if the stock itself loses value. If the stock goes up in value, the bets can become losers. Investors who bet against a stock are called “shorts.”

In the case of GameStop, the video game retailer many professional investors had written off, the shorts include at least two big hedge funds. Now a band of day traders, fueled in part by a message board on Reddit, are putting the squeeze on Wall Street.

The Times’s Matt Phillips explains what’s going on.

Peacock, Comcast’s ad-supported streaming service, grabbed over 33 million customers as of the end of last year, a 50 percent jump from September, the company reported in its fourth-quarter results Thursday.

The company overall saw a 2.4 percent drop in sales to $27.7 billion and a 29 percent plummet in adjusted profit to $2.6 billion as the pandemic continued to cut into its theatrical and theme parks businesses. Still, Comcast’s performance beat investor’s expectations. Brian Roberts, the chief executive, said he is “optimistic” the company will come back toward growth as vaccines are distributed throughout the world.

Comcast also announced it would raise its dividend payments to shareholders by 8 cents on an annualized basis to $1 per share and plans to repurchase shares later in the year. The stock rose more than 3 percent in premarket trading.

Comcast has recast itself as more of an internet and technology provider than a television service, and its focus on Peacock is part of that effort. The company’s quarterly performance has become a regular reminder of that ongoing transformation. Comcast’s traditional pay-TV business lost 248,000 customers in the period, but it added 538,000 broadband subscribers for a total of 30.6 million, a high. Its cable video customers now number only 19.8 million.

The company’s NBCUniversal division, which continues to undergo a massive reorganization, last week announced a deal with WWE to make Peacock its exclusive streaming provider, in effect buying out the WWE Network’s digital TV service. NBCUniversal has been bolstering Peacock’s sports lineup, adding the majority of its Premier League games to the platform. Comcast also plans to shut down its NBC Sports Cable network by the end of this year and shunt its programming over to Peacock and the USA Network.

But longer term, Peacock is meant to replace the lost advertising dollars from a shrinking pay-TV universe. That means it will need to be far larger and be available on digital players as well as other broadband systems such as Cox and Charter. Adding more sports and exclusive content would help add leverage to those negotiations.

Comcast’s NBC broadcast group saw a 12 percent drop in sales to $2.7 billion on weaker advertising, in part because of the loss of sports programming, while its studios division fell 8.3 percent to $1.4 billion. Advertising across its broadcast and cable networks fell 7.8 percent to $2.5 billion. Theme parks dropped 63 percent to $579 million.

The company still expects the Tokyo Olympics to take place this summer, a cash cow for its advertising business.