Categories
Health

Future Vaccines Rely upon Take a look at Topics in Quick Provide: Monkeys

Mark Lewis was dying to find monkeys. Millions of lives around the world were at stake.

Mr. Lewis, the CEO of Bioqual, was responsible for providing laboratory monkeys to pharmaceutical companies such as Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, which the animals needed to develop their Covid-19 vaccines. But when the coronavirus spread in the United States last year, there were few of the specially bred monkeys in the world.

About a dozen companies that could not provide scientists with monkeys, which can cost more than $ 10,000 each, looked for laboratory animals at the height of the pandemic.

“We lost our jobs because we couldn’t take care of the animals on time,” said Lewis.

The world needs monkeys whose DNA is very similar to that of humans to develop Covid-19 vaccines. However, a global shortage stemming from unexpected demand due to the pandemic has been exacerbated by a recent ban on the sale of wild animals from China, the leading supplier of laboratory animals.

The recent shortage has rekindled discussion of creating a strategic monkey reserve in the United States, an emergency supply similar to that maintained by the government for oil and grain.

As new variants of the coronavirus threaten to obsolete the current amount of vaccines, scientists are looking for new monkey sources, and the US is rethinking its reliance on China, a rival with its own biotech ambitions.

The pandemic has underscored the extent to which China controls the supplies of life-saving items, including masks and drugs, that the United States needs during a crisis.

American scientists have searched private and government-funded facilities in Southeast Asia and Mauritius, a tiny island nation off Southeast Africa, for populations of their preferred test subjects, rhesus and cynomolgus monkeys, also known as long-tailed macaques.

But no country can make amends for what China delivered before. Before the pandemic, China supplied over 60 percent of the 33,818 primates, mostly cynomolgus macaques, imported to the United States in 2019, according to analyst estimates based on data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In the United States, 25,000 laboratory monkeys live in its seven primate centers – predominantly rhesus monkeys with pink faces. About 600 to 800 of these animals have undergone coronavirus research since the pandemic began.

Scientists say monkeys are ideal samples for coronavirus vaccine research before testing in humans. The primates share more than 90 percent of our DNA. Because of their similar biology, they can be tested with nasal swabs and their lungs scanned. Scientists say finding a replacement for testing Covid-19 vaccines is almost impossible, despite drugs like dexamethasone, the steroid used to treat President Donald J. Trump, have been tested in hamsters.

The United States once relied on India to supply rhesus monkeys. In 1978 India stopped exporting after the Indian press reported that the monkeys were being used in the US for military tests. Pharmaceutical companies were looking for an alternative.

Eventually they landed on China.

The pandemic disrupted the decades-long relationship between American scientists and Chinese suppliers.

“When the Chinese market closed everyone was forced to go to fewer animals available,” said Lewis.

Updated

Apr. 23, 2021, 7:02 p.m. ET

For years, several airlines, including the major American airlines, have also refused to transport animals used in medical research because animal rights activists oppose it.

Meanwhile, the price of a cynomolgus monkey has more than doubled year over year to well over $ 10,000, Lewis said. Scientists researching cures for other diseases, including Alzheimer’s and AIDS, say their work has been delayed as coronavirus researchers give priority to the animals.

The shortage has led more and more American scientists to urge the government to ensure constant care for the animals.

Skip Bohm, associate director and senior veterinarian at the Tulane National Primate Research Center outside of New Orleans, The discussion about a strategic monkey sanctuary began about 10 years ago under the directors of the national primate research centers. However, due to the time and money invested in setting up a breeding program, a supply was never created.

“Our idea was like the strategic oil reserve in that there is a lot of fuel somewhere that can only be tapped in an emergency,” said Professor Bohm.

However, when new variants of the virus are discovered that may resume the race for a vaccine, scientists say the government must take immediate action on the supply.

“The strategic monkey reserve is exactly what we needed to deal with Covid and we just didn’t have it,” said Keith Reeves, principal researcher at the Center for Virology and Vaccine Research at Harvard Medical School.

However, a robust strategic reserve may still not be able to meet the skyrocketing demand for laboratory animals, researchers in China have learned. Even with a government-controlled supply of around 45,000 monkeys, researchers in China say they are struggling with a shortage.

Researchers often collect hundreds of samples from a single monkey, whose tissue can be frozen for years and examined over long periods of time. Scientists say they make the most of every animal, but monkeys infected with Covid-19 cannot be returned to live among other healthy animals and will eventually have to be euthanized.

In January, Shen Weiguo, general manager of Shanghai Technology Venture Capital Group, told local lawmakers that three major biomedical companies in the city were nearly 2,750 research monkeys, according to a report in the state news media last year. The deficit is set to grow 15 percent annually for the next five years, Shen said.

Hubei Topgene Biotechnology breeds monkeys for its own research and for export. The US used to be the top export destination, but the company currently doesn’t have enough animals to conduct its own experiments, said Yan Shuo, a sales manager.

“Now it’s not even about money,” said Mr. Yan. “We don’t even have monkeys to sell abroad.”

The United States has seven national primate research centers where the animals, when unexplored, live in colonies with access to nature and enrichment activities. The facilities are attached to research universities and are funded by the National Institutes of Health. Animal rights activists have long accused the centers of abuse, including separating babies from their mothers.

Matthew R. Bailey, president of the National Association for Biomedical Research, said he was preparing to increase the monkey shortage in the Biden administration. He said China’s decision to stop exports at the start of the pandemic was “likely a prudent emergency,” but suggested that China could resume exports given how the virus is now spreading.

The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the ban was not aimed at specific species or countries.

As soon as the international situation improves and the conditions for imports and exports are met, the Ministry will issue a statement actively considering resuming import and export permits and other related work.

Experts said the United States had some responsibility for not having enough research monkeys.

Budgets in the national primate centers have either remained flat or have been falling for more than a decade. Koen Van Rompay, an infectious disease expert at the California National Primate Research Center, said the federal government asked the center to expand its breeding colonies about 10 years ago but did not grant it an increase in funding, so it instead downsized its colony.

“What we did in a number of cases was give birth control to our women,” said Dr. Van Rompay. “So fewer babies would be born in the spring.”

At a panel organized by the National Institutes of Health in December 2018, the scientists discussed the challenges facing American primate care. There was an awareness then that “if China chooses to turn the cone off, we will be in big trouble,” said Jeffrey Roberts, associate director of the California National Primate Research Center.

Participants “agreed that the need to breed cynomolgus macaques domestically is essential and, if not met, could jeopardize biomedical research in the United States as a whole,” a report from the meeting said. “They stressed that it may be too late to meet these needs, but it will certainly be too late within a few months.”

Amber Wang and Elsie Chen contributed to the research.

Categories
Politics

The Virginia G.O.P. Voted on Its Future. The Losers Reject the Outcomes.

On the second front, how a convention would work, Republicans are grappling with a state ban on most gatherings of more than 10 people. As a result, the party cannot hold a personal meeting of several thousand people. Party leaders are trying to change their rules to allow for a congress that will be held in dozens of locations in Virginia.

This requires the approval of three-quarters of the members of the state central committee – a threshold that has not yet been reached, as 31 of the 72 members of the committee are campaigning for a primary school. In other words, these Republicans are trying to block the possibility of a convention in the hope that eventually a primary will have to be held.

“The fact that there is a minority faction that has lost and is standing in the way of a safe convention to try to get the primary that they can’t win fair – that says a lot about them,” said Patti Lyman, who Republican national committee woman for Virginia. “All of their arguments can be reduced to the following: We have lost and we don’t like it.”

Ms. Chase, who still argued with less than a week in Mr. Trump’s presidency that he could still be inaugurated for a second term, said Thursday that she “does not trust conventions” to which she is wrongly restricting electoral access Members of the military and others who cannot make it to a personal website.

“If we’re going to win as Republicans, we have to get more voters, who vote Republicans, rather than fewer,” she said. “Stop creating so many barriers for people who would normally choose.”

Some proponents of a convention advocate ranking voting, a system promoted by progressives elsewhere. The dispute threatens to undermine the already tough Republican struggle in this year’s elections and to extend democratic control of the state.

At the center of the party’s argument is a crowded group of Republican gubernatorial candidates, each with a candidate from the Trump and Establishment wings of the GOP and two wealthy wildcards. The main candidates are Ms. Chase; Kirk Cox, a former State House Speaker who is the party’s elected legislature favorite; Pete Snyder, a technology millionaire who lost an offer for lieutenant governor nomination at a party conference in 2013; and Glenn Youngkin, an even richer former private equity executive who is new to politics.

Categories
Health

Why Walmart is trying to past retail for future progress

A woman wearing a face mask walks past a sign informing customers that face coverings are required outside a Walmart store in Washington, DC on July 15, 2020.

Andrew Caballero-Reynolds | AFP | Getty Images

Walmart wants to unlock what it sees as its greatest asset: its reach.

160 million customers visit the store or website every month. The company doesn’t just want to sell groceries, clothing and other items. The company wants to look for new business opportunities, from increasing its ad sales to becoming a major healthcare provider. With the strategy, Walmart acknowledges a difficult reality: retail may not be enough to propel its future.

On Thursday, on a virtual investor day, executives at the retail giant spoke and outlined a plan to keep momentum as some pandemic tailwinds ease and online sales spike.

Doug McMillon, CEO of Walmart, said the discounter will bring together various services customers want, from issuing a credit or debit card to dropping groceries on their doorstep. It will also increase investments to meet customers’ changing shopping habits, such as: Take automation, for example, which helps keep pace with the high volume of roadside pick-up orders.

“We feel encouraged and are now moving faster and more aggressively,” he said. “We are scaling new functions and companies and designing them in such a way that they are mutually reinforcing.”

A new playbook

With the move, the big box retailer is taking a side from retailers like Apple and Amazon who have built an ecosystem of products and services to deepen loyalty and attract more customer wallets. Amazon Web Services was the profit engine of its parent company, helping the e-commerce giant offset the challenging economics of selling items that it has to pick, pack, and ship.

It’s a different Amazon strategy too. This fall, Walmart + was launched, a subscription-based service with benefits such as free shipping and unlimited home grocery deliveries. The service costs $ 98 per year or $ 12.95 per month.

However, Walmart is skeptical when it unveils the new game book. Despite a robust Christmas season and a surge in sales due to economic reviews, it fell short of earnings estimates for the fourth quarter. The results and the forecast of sales reductions in the coming year led to a sell-off. Shares fell more than 5% on Thursday lunchtime. During the fiscal year, Walmart increased its sales by $ 35 billion, but higher sales alone don’t mean higher profits.

Large investments are required to remain competitive. Walmart plans to spend around $ 14 billion in the coming year to improve the supply chain and improve automation, said the company’s CFO Brett Biggs. That’s higher than the typical rate of $ 10 to 11 billion, he said. These improvements are likely to make online sales more efficient and profitable.

Still, McMillon sees an opportunity for Walmart to capitalize on its assets – including its 4,700+ US locations. For example, the company can turn TV and cash register screens in stores into advertising opportunities, use its large parking lots to support health clinics opened in parts of the country, and promote online merchandise through the TikTok live streaming event.

“This is the right time to make these investments,” he said. “The strategy, the team and the skills are there. We know where the customer is going. We have momentum and our balance sheet is strong.”

Stay a few steps ahead

Walmart recently rebranded its advertising business, telling CNBC it plans to grow that business more than ten-fold over the next five years. It has opened 20 clinics with cheaper medical services like annual doctor’s offices, dental checkups, and therapy appointments – with plans for more. With the investment company Ribbit Capital, a fintech start-up is launched to offer its customers and employees unique, affordable financial products.

McMillon said the company needs to be a few steps ahead, especially given the rapid pace of change in retail. The pandemic has profoundly changed the way some customers shop by quickly relaying many of the customer trends that Walmart was prepared for, according to McMillion.

“People will continue to want to shop in compelling stores in the future, but there will be more and more instances where they will prefer to pick up an order or have it delivered,” he said.

“Some customers will at some point allow and pay us to replenish them in their homes with the items they routinely buy,” he said. “For an increasing number of customers, Walmart is seen more as a service. Customers will see us as the dealer who fulfills their wants and needs, but in a way that takes less time and effort.”

That is why it is investing in converting its stores into mini-warehouses, which use robots and staff to quickly complete online orders for delivery or roadside collection. This, in turn, will help attract more members to Walmart’s subscription service Walmart +, as home delivery is a major reason customers sign up, he said.

McMillon added that Walmart is letting go of some areas while investing in others. He said it will continue to segregate markets and companies, which will allow it to focus on areas with greater growth potential.

Categories
Business

The Auto Business Bets Its Future on Batteries

“Today’s batteries are not competitive,” said Jagdeep Singh, general manager of QuantumScape, based in San Jose, California. “Batteries have enormous potential and are vital to a renewable energy economy, but they need to get better.”

For the most part, all of the money that goes into battery technology is good news. Capitalism is working to solve a global problem. However, this reorganization of the auto industry will also claim some victims, such as the companies that build parts for cars and trucks with internal combustion engines, or the automakers and investors who rely on the wrong technology.

“Battery innovations are not overnight,” said Venkat Srinivasan, director of the Argonne National Laboratory’s Collaborative Center for Energy Storage Science. “It can take many years. All kinds of things can happen. “

Most experts are certain that the demand for batteries will boost China, which refines most of the metals used in batteries and produces more than 70 percent of all battery cells. According to predictions by Roland Berger, a German management consultancy, China’s influence on battery production will diminish only slightly over the next decade despite ambitious plans to expand production in Europe and the US.

Battery production has “profound geopolitical implications,” said Tom Einar Jensen, managing director of Freyr, which is building a battery factory in northern Norway to harness the region’s abundant wind and hydropower plants. “The European auto industry does not want to rely too much on imports from Asia in general and China in particular,” he added.

Freyr plans to raise $ 850 million as part of a proposed merger with Alussa Energy Acquisition Corporation, a Shell company that sold shares before it had assets. The deal, announced in January, would bring Freyr to the New York Stock Exchange. The company plans to manufacture batteries using technology developed by 24M Technologies of Cambridge, Massachusetts.

The first priority for the industry is to make batteries cheaper. Electric car batteries for a midsize vehicle cost about $ 15,000, or about twice the price that electric cars need for mass adoption, Srinivasan said.

Categories
Business

Ford will not ‘cede the longer term to anybody’ on electrical automobiles: CEO Farley

Ford Motor CEO Jim Farley on Friday touted the automaker’s strategy for electric vehicles and told CNBC that the company intends to compete strongly in the growing market.

Farley’s comments on “Squawk on the Street” came a day after Ford reported better-than-expected earnings in the fourth quarter. As part of that announcement, Ford said it would increase its electric vehicle investment to $ 22 billion by 2025, almost double what it had previously promised.

Ford’s shares rose 2.7% on Friday to around $ 11.70 apiece.

“We won’t leave the future to anyone,” Farley told CNBC’s Phil LeBeau. “Our electric strategy is very specific. We will invest in segments where we are the dominant player and we have economies of scale like the F-150, the transit van and our Mustang.”

As Ford provides new capital for the years to come, Farley said the company’s EV transition is now yielding results, pointing out that its all-electric Mustang Mach-E crossover has hit showrooms. He said he viewed the Mach-E as a “credible competitor” to Tesla’s compact SUV known as the Model Y.

Ford’s all-electric transit van is expected to arrive by the end of this year, Farley said, and the company’s work on a Michigan plant to build the electric version of its best-selling F-150 is ongoing. “This is the year. We’re not talking about aspirations,” said Farley, who took over the business on October 1.

The charging connection for the Ford E-Transit is located in the radiator grille of the vehicle.

ford

Wall Street’s focus on electric vehicles has increased. A number of players in space, including battery manufacturers and charging station companies, have gone public in the past few months. Ford’s Crosstown rival General Motors has also drawn street attention for its aggressive investments in electric vehicles. GM said last week it plans to cease production of all diesel and gasoline-powered cars, trucks and SUVs by 2035.

Before the announcement, Adam Jonas, an analyst at Morgan Stanley, told CNBC that GM, led by CEO Mary Barra, may be orchestrating “one of the most profound strategic turns not only in the auto industry, but also in the economy.” GM stocks are up more than 100% in the past six months, while Ford’s stocks are up more than 65% over the same stretch.

As the production and adoption of electric vehicles increases, some have raised concerns that there could be a battery shortage. Farley acknowledged that the company “needs to make sure when Ford ramp up EV manufacturing” [battery] Care so that we don’t end up in a situation where we are in chips. “Ford had to temporarily cut F-150 production to respond to an ongoing semiconductor shortage affecting the global automotive industry.

“That will be due to each manufacturer making the commitment,” Farley said. “We have to make our own decisions about vertical integration. Our $ 22 billion [EV investment] doesn’t even include that. You could expect more news from us on this vertical integration. “

Categories
Business

San Francisco’s Prime Artwork Faculty Says Future Hinges on a Diego Rivera Mural

The San Francisco Art Institute was on the verge of losing its campus and art collection to a public sale last fall when the University of California’s Board of Regents bought its $ 19.7 million debt from a private bank, to save the 150-year old institution from collapse.

The deal provides a lifeline, but the future of a beloved work of art – a $ 50 million mural by Diego Rivera that official figures could help balance the budget – is still in the air, and faculty and alumni are outraged.

The work from 1931 entitled “Making a Fresco Showing the Building of a City” is a fresco within a fresco. The tableau shows the creation of a city and a mural – with architects, engineers, craftsmen, sculptors and painters who work hard. Rivera himself can be seen from behind, holding a palette and a paintbrush with his assistants. It is one of three frescoes by the Mexican muralist in San Francisco that had a tremendous impact on other artists in the city.

Years of costly expansions and declining enrollments at the institute put it at risk, a situation that worsened during the pandemic.

The school has stressed that no final decision has been made to sell the mural. Behind the scenes, however, the institute’s administrators and directors are strongly pushing for it as it would pay off the debt and allow them to make ends meet on an annual operating budget of around $ 19 million.

In a December 23 email to employees in the New York Times, Jennifer Rissler, vice president and dean of academic affairs, admitted that a number of people had raised concerns about the possible sale of the mural. She added that “As part of its fiduciary duty, the board has voted to review all options to save the SFAI and continue to explore avenues and offers to furnish or sell the mural.”

At a board meeting on December 17, SFAI chair Pam Rorke Levy stated that filmmaker George Lucas was interested in buying the mural for the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art in Los Angeles. Details of this discussion were provided by a participant who asked for anonymity as the participant was not authorized to discuss internal matters.

Speaking to faculty members on Dec. 17, Ms. Levy outlined another plan that would see the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art take possession of the mural but leave it on campus as an adjoining room, said Dewey Crumpler, associate professor at the school .

A spokeswoman for the institute, Sara Fitzmaurice, the founder of the PR firm Fitz & Co., declined to discuss ongoing negotiations about the possible sale. “A number of discussions were held with several institutions about the possibility of renting or purchasing the mural in order to secure the future of the school,” she said in a statement.

In an interview last March, Ms. Levy said she would be receptive to selling the painting. “When you have an asset that is this valuable, there is always a discussion,” she said. “As a small college in an expensive city, we feel the pain.”

Faculty and staff have repeatedly raised objections. The final counter-argument came in a December 30 letter to the school community from a union representing their additional teachers, nearly 70 of whom were fired during the pandemic but who previously made up the majority of the faculty.

“The Diego Rivera mural is not a commodity whose identity and value is solely based on market valuation,” the letter said, “while selling it would resolve immediate financial bottlenecks,” it would represent a limited lifeline and would not appeal to samples Misconduct and mismanagement by the board and senior executives of the SFAI. “

In a statement, the institute described the allegations of bad leadership as “gross misrepresentation” and said that almost all board members joined the school after the debt arose.

The Rivera mural is intertwined with the legacy of the SFAI, which claims to be the oldest art school west of the Mississippi and has former students such as Annie Leibovitz, Catherine Opie and Kehinde Wiley. Selling the mural, having become such an important part of the institute’s identity over the past 90 years, may alienate the students, alumni, and faculties who value it.

“It’s insulting and heartbreaking,” said Kate Laster, an alumna of the institute who produced student exhibits in a gallery featuring the mural before graduating in 2019. “Selling the mural is an impractical option given the school’s duty to protect its own historical heritage.”

Aaron Peskin, an elected official in the district where the institute is located, also opposes the sale. “The idea of ​​anyone, let alone the University of California, selling this is heresy,” he recently told Mission Local’s news site, which first covered the deal with the regents on December 30th. “It would be a crime against the arts and the city’s heritage. Educational institutions should teach art, not sell it.”

The money for the institute comes from a 2016 loan that was used to finance the construction of the new campus in Fort Mason. Collateral for the loan included the school’s older campus on Chestnut Street and 19 works of art. Last year, the financial burden led school principals to consider permanent closure. It remained open in limited capacity after receiving $ 4 million in donations.

But it wasn’t enough. In July, Boston Private Bank & Trust Co. notified the institution that it had violated the loan terms by failing to repay a $ 3 million annual credit line required to extend the loan. The bank issued a public sale notice in October listing the collateral, including the Rivera mural and frescoes, including those by Victor Arnautoff, whose paintings are threatened with destruction elsewhere in San Francisco.

The Board of Regents blocked the sale by buying the institute’s debt earlier that month. With the new agreement, the public university system acquired the institute’s charter and became its landlord. The SFAI administrators have six years to buy back the property. Otherwise, the University of California would take possession of the campus.

And if the institute lost its home, school administrators would have to make more difficult decisions about the future of the mural. “If the SFAI gets out of the Chestnut Street campus for good, we may have to move the Diego Rivera mural,” said Ms. Fitzmaurice. “We were informed that such a potential move could be a multi-year process, so we started to investigate what is possible in this case.”

Categories
Business

Oxford researcher says future strains might be protected towards

Sir John Bell, a professor at Oxford University in the UK, told CNBC on Wednesday that he was confident that Covid-19 vaccines could be upgraded to provide effective protection against future coronavirus mutations.

Bell’s comments on “Closing Bell” come as global attention is focused on a strain of the virus that is widespread in the UK and that may spread more easily than previous variants. It has since been discovered in Colorado and California.

“This is going to be a game of cat and mouse,” said Bell, who worked with AstraZeneca to oversee vaccine development at Oxford. The UK government approved emergency vaccine use on Wednesday after granting limited approval for Pfizer and BioNTech’s vaccine earlier this month.

Studies are currently underway to officially determine whether Oxford-AstraZeneca’s vaccine will protect against the new strain of the virus, Bell said. “We think they probably can, but we just want to be absolutely sure.”

“Given the level of disease in the UK with the new variant … we will have many examples of people who have had the vaccine and are exposed to the virus and we will be able to report fairly quickly on whether the vaccine actually protects against this strain,” added Bell added.

In addition to the coronavirus variant found in Great Britain, a separate strain has come into focus, which was first found in South Africa. Officials at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said Wednesday it may also be floating around in America.

Bell told CNBC that he believes the variant discovered in South Africa has mutations that make it “a little more worrying” than the UK’s predominant strain. Still, Bell expressed confidence in how scientists will deal with virus mutations that escape the protection of existing vaccines.

“If we need to make new vaccines, now that we’ve done the first work, we can make them. I’m sure our friends can do the same with the RNA vaccines,” said Bell. Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccines were developed using messenger RNA technology, a new approach that uses genetic material to trigger an immune response. Oxford-AstraZeneca’s viral vector vaccine uses a weakened version of a cold virus that causes infections in chimpanzees.

“We are ready if we need to make another vaccine to get closer,” added Bell. He also noted that the vaccine update development process is unlikely to require the same large-scale clinical trials conducted this year, just immunogenicity studies to ensure that an immune response is elicited.

According to Dr. It is not uncommon for viruses to mutate, Scott Gottlieb, a former Food and Drug Administration commissioner who serves on Pfizer’s Board of Directors. “Some viruses like the flu develop their surface proteins very quickly, so we need a different flu vaccine every season,” he told CNBC earlier this month.

Gottlieb said at the time that he also believed the vaccines in place will protect against the strain of virus transmitted in the UK, as the vaccines target the entire spike protein of the coronavirus.

“We are developing antibodies against many different regions of this protein. Even if part of this protein were mutated and some antibodies no longer recognized it, there would be antibodies against other parts of this protein,” he said. “That probably won’t bypass our vaccines that easily, but at some point we’ll have to update the vaccines.”

Disclosure: Scott Gottlieb is a CNBC employee and a member of the boards of directors of Pfizer, the genetic testing startup Tempus, and the biotech company Illumina. Gottlieb is also co-chair of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings and Royal Caribbean’s Healthy Sail Panel.