Categories
Politics

Lawmakers Unite in Bipartisan Fury Over Afghanistan Withdrawal

Moderate Democrats are angry with the Biden administration for their dire plans to evacuate the Americans and their allies. Liberal Democrats, who have long tried to end military engagements around the world, grumble that the images from Kabul are damaging their cause.

And Republicans, who months ago hailed former President Donald J. Trump’s even faster schedule to end US military involvement in the nation’s longest war, have brushed aside their earlier encouragement to accuse President Biden of humiliating the nation.

If Mr Biden hoped to find cover from politicians from both parties who had achieved broad consensus on the withdrawal, he has found little so far.

Faced with images of panicked Afghans bullying Kabul airport and inundated with appeals from Afghans seeking refuge, some Democrats openly attacked their president’s performance on Monday.

“I’ve been asking the administration for a refugee evacuation plan for months,” said Seth Moulton, Rep., Democrat of Massachusetts and former Marine Corps captain. “I was very clear: ‘We need a plan. We need someone to be in charge. ‘ To be honest, we still haven’t really seen the plan. “

“You had the opportunity for weeks. They had an amazing coalition of liberal and conservative lawmakers ready to assist the government in this effort, ”continued Moulton, who serves on the Armed Services Committee. “In my opinion, this was not only a national security mistake, it was also a political mistake.”

Some Liberal Democrats made appearances on television broadcast by White House officials on Twitter ahead of Mr Biden’s speech to the nation at the White House in defense of the President. However, finding few vocal defenders, administrative aides distributed topics to talk to Democrats in Congress to bolster the president’s position.

The government said the collapse of the Afghan government and the resulting chaos were not indictments of US policies, but evidence that the only way to prevent a disaster would have been to increase the presence of American troops. And in response to critics who say the president was caught on the wrong foot, the topics of the conversation read: “The government knew that there was a possibility that Kabul could fall to the Taliban. It wasn’t inevitable. It was a possibility. “

Rep. Barbara Lee, Democrat of California, who has been one of the fiercest voices against the wars that followed the 11th attacks for more than two decades, added, “We’ve been there for 20 years, spent over $ 1 trillion and trained over 300,000 of the Afghan armed forces. “

Rep. Jake Auchincloss, a Democrat of Massachusetts and a former Marine officer who served in Helmand Province, argued that Mr Biden’s only possible options would be to increase the American military presence in Afghanistan as the deadline for withdrawal agreed by Mr Trump. came and went – or to “finally tell the American people the truth”.

“What I have heard from voters,” he said in an interview, “is that what we are seeing in Afghanistan is worrying, but that people appreciate the President’s integrity for emphasizing that there is no end there are. Twenty years has been a long time to give Afghan leaders time to sow the seeds of civil society and instead they have only sown the seeds of corruption and incompetence. “

Updated

Aug. 16, 2021, 3:50 p.m. ET

In private, the Liberal Democrats were appalled by the widening catastrophe that Afghan refugees were exposed to. And some worried that the images of chaos in Kabul would serve as a cudgel for restrictive Republicans like Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the minority leader, to crack down on Democrats pushing for permits to use military force to be revoked who were in 1991 before the Gulf War, in 2001 after the 9/11 attacks, and in 2002 before the US invasion of Iraq.

The Democratic left flank has pushed for substantial cuts in military spending and the Department of Defense’s overseas operations, as well as a realignment of government priorities for poverty reduction, education and childcare. But they now have to grapple with indelible images of the cost of US withdrawal.

Rep. Daniel Crenshaw, Republican of Texas and former Navy SEAL, wielded that stick when he said of Fox and Friends on Monday, “We’re getting this because we’re focusing on hollow slogans like ‘Bring the Troops Home’ and ‘No Endless Get more. ‘”

Mr McConnell, who had been ruthless during Mr Trump’s tenure in his disdain for the former president’s desire to keep his campaign promise and withdraw troops from Afghanistan, pounded Mr Biden in a statement, saying that the nation’s enemies ” watch “embarrassment of a superpower that has been laid deep.”

“America’s two decades of engagement in Afghanistan have had many writers,” said McConnell. “Just like the strategic missteps along the way. But while the monumental collapse predicted by our own experts is happening in Kabul today, the responsibility rests directly on the shoulders of our current commander in chief. “

Few Republicans, however, were willing to allude to the role of one of Mr Biden’s predecessors – or that Mr Trump had supported an even faster withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and, in April, called ending the war “a wonderful and positive thing”. “

Rep. Andy Biggs, Republican of Arizona and chairman of the far-right House Freedom Caucus, accused Biden on Monday of “abandoning Trump’s peace plan and exit strategy and creating his own arbitrarily”. In February, he wrote to Mr Biden pleading with him to withdraw American troops from Afghanistan “in the coming weeks”.

But in a sign that lawmakers believed the withdrawal from Afghanistan was still supported by large American voters – at least for now – even some notoriously radical Republicans refrained from condemning the decision themselves.

“There is a difference between the decision to back out and the way that decision was carried out,” said Senator Tom Cotton, Republican of Arkansas, on Fox and Friends.

“Whatever you think of the initial decision, the execution of Joe Biden was ruthlessly negligent,” he said, adding that “everything” Biden “might have to wait a few more months” to begin the withdrawal.

The political ramifications of the chaos and possible bloodshed in Afghanistan are not clear either in next year’s mid-term congressional elections or in the 2024 presidential election. Mr Trump felt the political advantage of retreating when he signed a peace deal with the Taliban and even invited Taliban leaders to Camp David from Taliban-controlled Afghanistan ahead of the anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks. (The idea was quickly foiled.)

As soon as the images of Kabul fade off television screens this week, relief that the war was over – at least for US troops – could be the dominant emotional outcome.

Rep. Ruben Gallego, Democrat of Arizona and a former Marine who served in Iraq, said in a long statement on Twitter that the American public simply “stopped caring about Afghanistan years ago.”

“Our military has not abandoned Afghanistan. The American people have not abandoned Afghanistan, ”wrote Mr Gallego. “Hubris of us, the elites in Washington, DC, did that. We did not understand Afghanistan and we did not understand the will of the American public for a long commitment … again. “

Jonathan Weisman contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Entertainment

‘Wrath of Man’ Assessment: ‘H’ Has Some Fury

Filmmaker Guy Ritchie has long shown a willingness to embrace almost any blockbuster format a particular studio might want to offer him. Experience the noisy Sherlock Holmes-era shots he took with Robert Downey Jr. or his recent live-action look at Disney’s Aladdin. But his most entertaining films remain the tough, nasty crime thrillers with which he began his career in 1999 with “Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels”.

His new “Wrath of Man” is such an item, although it’s darker and less exuberant than “Lock”. It’s also a remake of the 2004 French film “Le Convoyeur”. Ritchie does better here with used material than with “Aladdin”, not to mention “Swept Away” (2002).

Jason Statham plays Hill, a mysterious, silent tough guy who takes a job at an armored car company that was recently hit by murderous robbers. His coach, Bullet, shortens Hill’s name to “H.” “Like the bomb,” Bullet explains to a colleague.

H proves his prowess by single-handedly hijacking a truck in which, in an extraordinarily satisfying moment, he pulls out a punk played by pop musician Post Malone. H’s staff greet him as a hero, but other characters wonder who exactly this guy is and what he’s doing on this job.

As Kirk Douglas pointed out in “The Fury” and Liam Neeson in “Taken,” there are certain men whose families shouldn’t be messed with. Here Statham is one of them. The severity of H’s true mission explains the tone of the film. Ritchie reveals key story points with clever time-juggling editing and keeps the tension going well into the climax of the film, which delivers exactly what the viewer was hoping for.

Wrath of man
Rated R for violence and language. Running time: 1 hour 58 minutes. In theaters. Please consult the Policies of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention before viewing films in theaters.

Categories
Business

European Tremendous League met with widespread fury

SALFORD, ENGLAND – MARCH 16: Salford City co-owner Gary Neville oversees the Sky Bet League Two game between Salford City and Colchester United at Moor Lane on March 16, 2021 in Salford, England. Sports stadiums across the UK remain tightly restricted due to the coronavirus pandemic as government social distancing laws ban fans in venues, resulting in games being played behind closed doors. (Photo by James Gill – Danehouse / Getty Images)

James Gill – Danehouse | Getty Images Sports | Getty Images

LONDON – A new breakaway football competition known as the European Super League has received widespread criticism and opposition from former players, politicians, governing bodies, experts and fans.

The ESL, announced on Sunday, should keep up with the UEFA Champions League format, which is currently Europe’s best annual club competition.

Twelve of Europe’s richest teams have signed up to be founding members of the new league, and JPMorgan has provided $ 6 billion in debt funding.

Teams that have agreed to play in the league are as follows:

  • England: Manchester United, Manchester City, Liverpool, Tottenham, Chelsea and Arsenal.
  • Spain: Barcelona, ​​Real Madrid and Atletico Madrid.
  • Italy: Juventus, AC Milan and Inter Milan.

“I’m disgusted … utterly disgusted,” said Gary Neville, a former Manchester United defender, regarding the Super League during an interview on Sky Sports News on Sunday.

Notable absences at ESL include French Paris Saint Germain and German Bayern Munich. However, three more teams will join the league ahead of the inaugural season, which will take place “as soon as it becomes practical”.

The ESL will eventually have 20 clubs and 15 of them will be permanent which means they cannot be relegated. This is controversial as teams currently have to qualify for the Champions League every year and can be promoted and relegated from the English Premier League, Spanish La Liga and Italian Serie A.

Real Madrid president Florentino Perez has been named the first chairman of the Super League.

“We will help football at all levels and bring it to its rightful place in the world,” Perez said in a statement on Sunday. “Football is the only global sport with more than 4 billion fans. As large clubs, we are responsible for responding to your wishes.”

The already wealthy founding teams of ESL will receive a total of 3.5 billion euros for infrastructure investments. According to The Financial Times, they will receive a welcome bonus of up to EUR 300 million each for joining the Super League.

At the same time, they plan to keep playing and making money in their existing leagues where some other clubs have struggled to stay in business.

New York-listed shares of Manchester United rose 8% in the pre-market due to the ESL announcement, while Juventus shares in Italy rose nearly 14%.

“Anti-Soccer Pyramid Scheme”

“If the fans are one against this anti-football pyramid scheme, it can be stopped,” said former English striker Gary Lineker, who is now presenting the BBC’s “Match of the Day” TV highlights.

Neville, now an expert and commentator on Sky Sports News, said he was particularly “disgusted” with Manchester United and Liverpool, which have long had close ties to the working-class communities that surround their northern England grounds.

“You’re leaving in an unrivaled league that you can’t relegate from,” said Neville. “We have to take back power in this country from the clubs at the top of this league, and that includes my club.”

The billionaire owners of the clubs who signed up as part of the ESL have been accused of being greedy.

“They have nothing to do with football in this country,” said Neville. “There is more than 100 years of history in this country of fans who have lived and loved these clubs and who need to be protected.”

An independent regulator should be put in place to ensure checks and balances are maintained in the English Premier League, he added.

Liverpool fan Tom Cook told CNBC: “It is transforming football into a US sports model where there is no relegation / promotion and the biggest teams control the broadcast rights.”

As a result, they are “getting richer and richer – with a questionable amount of that wealth supposedly trickling down the football pyramid,” added Cook.

UEFA is fighting back

UEFA said in a statement on Sunday that it is united with the top European leagues in its “efforts to stop this cynical project. This project is based on the self-interest of some clubs at a time when society is more than ever Solidarity needs. ” “”

It added: “We will look at all the measures available to us at all levels, both in the judiciary and in sport, to prevent this from happening. Football is based on open competition and athletic merit; it cannot be otherwise.”

The ESL was announced the day before the plans for an expanded and restructured Champions League were signed by UEFA. Planned changes reportedly include 100 more games per season and more financial ties between top clubs.

French President Emmanuel Macron said on Sunday he supported the position of the European football association UEFA in rejecting the prospect of a breakaway Super League.

“The President of the Republic welcomes the position of French clubs to refuse to participate in a European Super League football project that threatens the principle of solidarity and sporting merit,” the French Presidency said in a statement sent to Reuters.

“The French state will support all steps taken by the LFP, the FFF, UEFA and FIFA to protect the integrity of national or European federal competitions,” added the Elysee, referring to the national, European and global governing bodies for football.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson wrote on Twitter that the Super League “would be very harmful to football and we are helping football authorities to take action”.