Categories
World News

Renewables might oust fossil fuels to energy the world by 2050

Employees clean solar modules that will be exported to Sudan on October 16, 2020 at a factory in Ji an, Jiangxi Province, China.

Deng Heping | Visual China Group | Getty Images

LONDON – Solar and wind power could completely replace fossil fuels and become a global source of electricity by 2050, a new report says.

The Carbon Tracker think tank report released on Friday also predicted that if wind and solar power continued on their current growth trajectory, they would displace fossil fuels from the electricity sector by the mid-2030s.

Current technology gave the world the ability to generate 6,700 petawatt hours (PWh) of electricity from solar and wind energy, the researchers said – more than 100 times the global energy consumption in 2019.

Despite the potential to generate enormous amounts of energy, according to the report, only 0.7 PWh of solar energy and 1.4 PWh of wind energy were generated in 2019.

However, the authors were confident that the continuing decline in costs would lead to exponential growth in the generation of solar and wind power. With an annual growth rate of 15%, the sun and wind would generate all of the world’s electricity by the mid-2030s and supply all of the world’s energy by 2050.

The report found that the cost of solar energy had decreased by an average of 18% per year since 2010, while the price of wind power had decreased by an average of 9% per year over the same period.

According to the report, solar energy had grown an average of 39% per year over the past decade and had almost doubled every two years. Meanwhile, wind power capacity had increased 17% per year, with advances such as better panels and taller turbines helping to reduce costs.

Rise in steam and exhaust gas from the RWE Weisweiler coal-fired power plant on February 11, 2021 near Inden.

Lukas Schulze | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Nevertheless, there is still skepticism about the likelihood of an imminent so-called energy transition. Some climatologists believe that it is already “practically impossible” to limit the temperature rise of the planet to 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels – a fundamental goal set in the Paris Agreement.

Carroll Muffett, executive director of the nonprofit center for international environmental law, told CNBC earlier this month that “embedded power structures and continued support for dying industries” would thwart progress in the transition to renewable energy sources.

And while many global companies are pledging to help in efforts to slow climate change, others are doubling their funding for fossil fuels.

Of the 60 largest banks in the world, 33 increased their funding for the fossil fuel sector between 2016 and 2020. This emerges from a CNBC analysis of the Banking on Climate Chaos 2021 report.

“Abundant” Africa

Carbon Tracker researchers identified four key groups of countries based on their potential to use wind and solar energy to meet domestic demand.

Low-income, low-energy countries in sub-Saharan Africa were labeled “overabundant,” meaning they had the potential to generate at least 1,000 times more energy than their domestic demand.

Africa in particular has great potential in implementing renewable energy infrastructure, the report said. Researchers said the region could become a “renewable energy superpower”.

Those with the potential to use at least 100 times more energy than demand were labeled “abundant” countries. Australia, Chile and Morocco, which had well-developed infrastructure and governance, were classified as “abundant”.

China, India and the US, which had the potential to produce enough to meet their domestic demand, were “full” while Japan, South Korea and much of Europe were “stretched” when it came to using their renewable resources effectively use.

Categories
World News

Tanzanian President’s Absence Fuels Hypothesis About His Well being

NAIROBI, Kenya – When an unrecorded number of Tanzanians succumbed to the coronavirus, the country’s president consistently downplayed the pandemic, opposed protective measures, scoffed at vaccines and said God helped eradicate the virus.

Well, President John Magufuli’s unusually long absence from the public is fueling speculation that he himself is seriously ill with Covid-19 and is being treated outside of the country.

Rumors started buzzing this week after Tanzania’s leading opposition, Tundu Lissu, said Mr Magufuli was infected with the virus and was being treated at a hospital in neighboring Kenya. In a text message, Mr Lissu said he learned from “fairly authoritative sources” that the president was flown to the Kenyan capital, Nairobi, on Monday evening and checked into Nairobi Hospital, one of the largest private facilities in the country.

On Tuesday, Mr Lissu asked the authorities to reveal the whereabouts of the president, who has not appeared publicly for almost two weeks. On Wednesday, he said that Mr. Magufuli was rushed to a hospital in India to “avoid being embarrassed on social media” if “the worst happens in Kenya”.

Mr. Magufuli did not attend a virtual summit for leaders of the East African regional bloc on February 27 and was represented by Vice President Samia Suluhu Hassan.

“The most powerful man in Tanzania is now sneaking around like an outlaw,” said Lissu in a Twitter post on Wednesday.

“His COVID denialism in ruins, his folly about prayer over science has turned into a deadly boomerang,” he said in another post on Thursday.

Comments from Mr. Lissu came after the Tanzanian human rights organization Fichua Tanzania said Mr Magufuli had left the country to seek treatment in Kenya.

With speculation on social media about his whereabouts and illness remaining widespread, the Kenyan newspaper Daily Nation also reported that an “African leader” had been admitted to the Nairobi hospital, citing diplomatic sources saying the The leader is “on a ventilator”.

While these and similar rumors about the president’s health were circulating, government officials defended President Magufuli and threatened to punish these circulating presumptions about his health.

Updated

March 11, 2021, 4:04 p.m. ET

“The head of state is not a TV presenter who had a show but didn’t show up,” said Mwigulu Nchemba, Minister for Legal and Constitutional Affairs, in a Twitter post. “The head of state is not the leader of jogging clubs that should be in the neighborhood every day.”

Information Minister Innocent Bashungwa warned the public and the media that using “rumors” as official information was against the country’s media laws.

From At the start of the pandemic a year ago, the 61-year-old Magufuli railed against masks and social distancing measures, advocated unproven cures as cures, and said the country “absolutely ended” the virus through prayer. Popularly known as “The Bulldozer”, Magufuli also questioned the effectiveness of vaccines, arguing that if the vaccines made by “The White Man” had been effective, AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria would have been eradicated.

Under the leadership of Mr Magufuli, which began with his election in 2015, Tanzania, once a model of stability in the region, has slid towards autocracy and authorities cracked down on the press, opposition and right-wing groups. Mr Magufuli won a second five-year term last October in an election marked by allegations of widespread fraud and irregularities.

Mr Lissu, who was the main opposition candidate against Mr Magufuli, left the country to go into exile in Belgium, where he is staying.

As of last April, Tanzania has not disclosed any data on the coronavirus to the World Health Organization, reporting only 509 cases and 21 deaths from Covid 19. This lack of transparency has been widely condemned, including by WHO Director General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Last May, the head of the national laboratory in Tanzania was suspended after Mr Magufuli questioned the effectiveness of the test kits supplied by the Africa Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mr Magufuli said the kits had shown positive results on samples secretly taken from a goat and a papaya fruit – allegations that have been rejected by the CDC in Africa and WHO

When lawmakers sounded the alarm over a spate of pneumonia deaths, health experts and foreign diplomats urged the government to take the pandemic seriously.

In January, the US embassy in Dar es Salaam, the former capital and largest city of Tanzania, warned of a “significant increase” in Covid-19 cases. The Roman Catholic Church has also urged the government to admit the truth of the virus and urged its parishioners to avoid large gatherings.

Tanzanian leaders like Seif Sharif Hamad, the first vice president of the semi-autonomous Tanzanian island of Zanzibar, have died after contracting the coronavirus. Shortly after it became known that Mr Hamad had succumbed to the virus last month, Treasury Secretary Philip Mpango appeared at a press conference in the Tanzanian capital, Dodoma, to deny rumors that he too had died. However, Mr. Mpango was not particularly comforting when, flanked by exposed doctors, he began to gasp violently and cough restlessly.

Finally, under pressure, in late February, Mr Magufuli changed course and asked people to wear masks and take advice from experts.

But it was not too late for Mr Lissu.

“It is a sad comment on his administration of our country that this has happened,” said Mr Lissu in a post on Twitter about the infection of Mr Magufuli, which is evidence that “prayers, steam inhalations and other unproven herbal mixtures are being used are.” Advocates are no protection against coronavirus! “

Categories
World News

U.S. is ‘nonetheless struggling to maneuver away from fossil fuels’ 

The world’s largest carbon-emitting nations have lagged far behind their competitors in tackling a “global climate emergency”, according to new research.

The Green Future Index, released by MIT Technology Review late last month, measures and rates 76 nations and territories for their progress in building a low-carbon future. It found that China and the United States continue to lag behind Europe and other parts of the world in decarbonization.

“Europe is fast becoming a leading climate company with 15 of the top 20 countries in the index,” Claire Beatty, editorial director at MIT Technology Review Insights, told CNBC.

The open assessment underscores the slow progress that major polluters are making in their efforts to decouple their energy systems and economies from fossil fuels, despite new pledges to prioritize clean technology, industry and infrastructure in their post-pandemic recovery plans.

At the top of the Green Future Index is Iceland, a nation with a strong track record in clean energy generation and carbon capture technology. This is followed by Denmark (2nd), Norway (3rd), France (4th) and Ireland (5th).

The index takes into account five pillars, including carbon emissions, the share of renewable energies in energy consumption, environmentally friendly initiatives of a society, innovations in decarbonization and the effectiveness of national climate policy.

“Many of these countries, especially in Northern Europe, are very ambitious in decarbonising and building green infrastructures into their energy and transportation industries,” said Beatty.

Beyond the European bloc, the survey reveals a far more troubling history of global efforts to address the global climate challenge.

Great country ranking

The largest carbon emitting nations in the world had poor results. India (21st) was well ahead of the US (40th) and China (45th) in overall decarbonization efforts.

Despite strong emissions growth, India said India was “rapidly adopting renewable energy and building some of the world’s largest solar systems”. Even so, India still relies heavily on coal for cheap power generation and jobs.

Researchers said the United States, responsible for 15% of global emissions, “is still struggling to move away from fossil fuels and carbon-intensive agriculture.” The Joe Biden government pledges to reverse the rolling back on environmental regulations and make the US a 100% clean energy economy with net zero emissions by 2050.

“The lack of political leadership in the US on climate and energy over the past four years has been very problematic,” Kurt Waltzer, executive director of the research organization Clean Air Task Force, told CNBC.

“The US has seen significant growth in renewable energy, but it started from a very small base. To truly move to a decarbonised energy system, the US needs to set clear requirements in conjunction with energy innovation strategies that will keep all sectors out of emissions cause, “Waltzer added.

China, responsible for 28% of global emissions, has pledged to hit net carbon zero by 2060, but progress is slow. Coal continues to play a key role in China’s energy mix.

“National climate ambitions are currently too low – an issue that will be the main theme of COP26 later this year – but it is important that we do not treat all countries equally,” said Waltzer.

“The industrialized countries should lead with mandates and innovation policies that create decarbonised energy markets. Developing countries must incorporate innovation into economic development and plan longer-term routes to net zero,” he added.

Middle East Progress

The Middle East’s petroeconomics also underperformed, even if the rich Gulf states continue to push ahead with their climate plans.

Morocco (26th) was the highest ranking country in the Middle East and North Africa. Over 40% of the country’s electricity is now generated from renewable sources.

Israel (38th) took second place in the region and promised to get 13% of its energy from renewable sources by 2025. The UAE (43rd) took third place.

Petrostats like Saudi Arabia (61st), Russia (73rd) and Iran (74th) were classified as “climate protection” because of “a lack of progress and commitment to the development of a modern, clean and innovative economy”. Qatar was ranked 76th at the bottom of the index.

The report said the pressure on oil revenues associated with Covid-19 would likely delay national economic diversification programs and further stall emissions reduction efforts.

Categories
Health

Johnson & Johnson’s Vaccine Provides Sturdy Safety however Fuels Concern About Variants

[Live updates: follow our coverage of the coronavirus]

Johnson & Johnson announced on Friday that its one-dose coronavirus vaccine provided strong protection against Covid-19, potentially offering the United States a third powerful tool in a desperate race against a worldwide rise in virus mutations.

But the results came with a significant cautionary note: The vaccine’s efficacy rate dropped from 72 percent in the United States to 57 percent in South Africa, where a highly contagious variant is driving most cases. Studies suggest that this variant also blunts the effectiveness of Covid vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna and Novavax. The variant has spread to at least 31 countries, including the United States, where two cases were documented this week.

Johnson & Johnson said that it planned to apply for emergency authorization of the vaccine from the Food and Drug Administration as soon as next week, putting it on track to receive clearance later in February.

“This is the pandemic vaccine that can make a difference with a single dose,” said Dr. Paul Stoffels, the chief scientific officer of Johnson & Johnson.

The Johnson & Johnson vaccine was 85 percent effective in preventing severe disease, regardless of what variant caused it, the company said. While less effective than the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines, Johnson & Johnson’s is still considered a strong vaccine by scientists. Annual flu vaccines, for example, are typically 40 to 60 percent effective.

The company’s announcement comes as the Biden administration is pushing to immunize Americans faster even with a tight vaccine supply. White House officials have been counting on Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine to ease the shortfall. But the company may only have about seven million doses ready when the F.D.A. decides whether to authorize it, according to federal health officials familiar with its production, and about 30 million doses by early April.

The variant from South Africa, known as B.1.351, could make things even worse for the vaccine push. Given the speed at which the variant swept through that country, it is conceivable that by April it could make up a large fraction of infections in the United States.

The fact that four vaccines backed by the federal government seem to be less effective against the B.1.351 variant has unsettled federal officials and vaccine experts alike. Facing this uncertainty, many researchers said it was imperative to get as many people vaccinated as possible — quickly. Lowering the rate of infection could thwart the contagious variants while they are still rare, and prevent other viruses from gaining new mutations that could cause more trouble.

“If ever there was reason to vaccinate as many people as expeditiously as we possibly can with the vaccine that we have right now, now is the time,” Dr. Anthony S. Fauci, the government’s top infectious disease expert, said in an interview. “Because the less people that get infected, the less chance you’re going to give this particular mutant a chance to become dominant.”

As the United States scrambles to get enough vaccines, the country is turning into something of an evolutionary experiment. The B.1.351 variant is one of several that have arrived in the country or originated here, all with the ability to spread faster than other variants.

“The pandemic is a lot more complicated now than it was a couple months ago,” said Dr. Dan Barouch, a virologist at Beth Israel Medical Center in Boston.

Vaughan Cooper, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Pittsburgh, said that all the new variants were likely evolving quietly for months before bursting on the scene. “I think we’re going to see many stories like this,” he said.

Federal regulators are also still waiting on data from Johnson & Johnson’s new manufacturing facility in Baltimore that prove it can mass-produce the vaccine. The company is counting on that factory to help reach its contractual pledge to the federal government of 100 million doses by the end of June.

If Johnson & Johnson can deliver vaccines quickly enough to the United States, it might be able to help drive down cases before variants make things worse. Since the vaccine requires only a single shot — unlike the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines, which require two — that delivery would translate into full coverage for 100 million people.

Johnson & Johnson’s vaccine has another advantage that might help speed up the rollout. It can stay viable in a refrigerator for three months, while the two authorized vaccines have to be kept frozen. That gives the company an edge not just in reaching more isolated parts of the United States, but in getting the vaccine to remote areas of the world that could otherwise seed more aggressive mutants.

“I hope this vaccine gets approved as soon as possible to reduce disease burden around the world,” said Akiko Iwasaki, immunologist at Yale University. She pointed out that the shot greatly reduced the number of severe Covid cases, even those caused by the variant. “This is a really great result.”

Still, Johnson & Johnson and other vaccine makers must prepare for the B.1.351 variant or another one surging to dominance and demanding new vaccines. “You’ve got to be nimble enough to be able to adapt by upgrading our vaccines that match the dominant strain,” Dr. Fauci said.

Exactly when to make that switch will be a difficult decision, because the viruses are spreading unpredictably, and manufacturing new doses will be a huge undertaking.

“The implications of that are big. You would not take that choice lightly,” said John D. Grabenstein, an epidemiologist with the Immunization Action Coalition, a nonprofit organization that disseminates information about vaccines. “It’s not doomsday. It’s just that we are going to need a bigger boat.”

Johnson & Johnson’s announcement came one day after Novavax said an early analysis of its 15,000-person trial in Britain had revealed that the two-dose vaccine had an efficacy rate of nearly 90 percent there. But in a small trial in South Africa, the efficacy rate dropped to just under 50 percent.

Johnson & Johnson presented only a summary of findings of its clinical trial. The vaccine was 85 percent effective in preventing severe disease in all three regions where the trial was run: the United States, Latin America and South Africa. After 28 days, none of the vaccinated participants who developed Covid-19 had to be hospitalized.

The company reported that the vaccine’s protective effect seems to increase with time. But without long-term data on immunity, scientists and regulators do not yet know whether the vaccine’s efficacy peaks at some point before dropping.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

Am I eligible for the Covid vaccine in my state?

Currently more than 150 million people — almost half the population — are eligible to be vaccinated. But each state makes the final decision about who goes first. The nation’s 21 million health care workers and three million residents of long-term care facilities were the first to qualify. In mid-January, federal officials urged all states to open up eligibility to everyone 65 and older and to adults of any age with medical conditions that put them at high risk of becoming seriously ill or dying from Covid-19. Adults in the general population are at the back of the line. If federal and state health officials can clear up bottlenecks in vaccine distribution, everyone 16 and older will become eligible as early as this spring or early summer. The vaccine hasn’t been approved in children, although studies are underway. It may be months before a vaccine is available for anyone under the age of 16. Go to your state health website for up-to-date information on vaccination policies in your area

Is the vaccine free?

You should not have to pay anything out of pocket to get the vaccine, although you will be asked for insurance information. If you don’t have insurance, you should still be given the vaccine at no charge. Congress passed legislation this spring that bars insurers from applying any cost sharing, such as a co-payment or deductible. It layered on additional protections barring pharmacies, doctors and hospitals from billing patients, including those who are uninsured. Even so, health experts do worry that patients might stumble into loopholes that leave them vulnerable to surprise bills. This could happen to those who are charged a doctor visit fee along with their vaccine, or Americans who have certain types of health coverage that do not fall under the new rules. If you get your vaccine from a doctor’s office or urgent care clinic, talk to them about potential hidden charges. To be sure you won’t get a surprise bill, the best bet is to get your vaccine at a health department vaccination site or a local pharmacy once the shots become more widely available.

Can I choose which vaccine I get?How long will the vaccine last? Will I need another one next year?

That is to be determined. It’s possible that Covid-19 vaccinations will become an annual event, just like the flu shot. Or it may be that the benefits of the vaccine last longer than a year. We have to wait to see how durable the protection from the vaccines is. To determine this, researchers are going to be tracking vaccinated people to look for “breakthrough cases” — those people who get sick with Covid-19 despite vaccination. That is a sign of weakening protection and will give researchers clues about how long the vaccine lasts. They will also be monitoring levels of antibodies and T cells in the blood of vaccinated people to determine whether and when a booster shot might be needed. It’s conceivable that people may need boosters every few months, once a year or only every few years. It’s just a matter of waiting for the data.

Will my employer require vaccinations?Where can I find out more?

Dr. Stoffels said the company was still waiting for more data on whether the vaccine can protect against asymptomatic infection.

The company is preparing a lengthy briefing document it will submit to the F.D.A. in its application for authorization. The agency’s scientists will review the raw data from the trial and present their own analysis.

Unlike the messenger RNA vaccines made by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, Johnson & Johnson uses an adenovirus, which normally causes the common cold. While adenovirus-based vaccines have been investigated for some three decades, they have yet to be licensed for use in the United States.

Johnson & Johnson’s Ebola vaccine became the first approved adenovirus-based vaccine for any disease when European regulators gave it the green light last July. Astra-Zeneca and the University of Oxford used a different adenovirus for their coronavirus vaccine, which is now authorized in Britain and other countries. Russian scientists created their Sputnik V vaccine from adenoviruses as well.

Johnson & Johnson received $456 million from Operation Warp Speed to support its research. In July, the government agreed to purchase 100 million doses for $1 billion if it proved safe and effective.

That same month, the company moved into clinical trials, which found that a single shot produced a strong immune response, consistent with experiments done on monkeys. Johnson & Johnson began the final “Phase 3” trial in September, again using a single dose. It recruited volunteers in the United States, South Africa and Latin America.

Half of the volunteers received the vaccine, and half received a placebo. The company then had to wait. Only when enough people in the trial got Covid-19 would an independent board of advisers look at the results to see how many sick volunteers were vaccinated — a process known as unblinding.

Late last year, surges of coronavirus infections accelerated the trial toward unblinding. In December, Johnson & Johnson decided it would not need to recruit 60,000 volunteers as it originally planned. It capped the trial at 45,000.

Like other vaccine developers, Johnson & Johnson was required by the F.D.A. to also record information about adverse events experienced by the volunteers for the first few months after vaccination.

Dr. Barouch, who led the team that designed the vaccine and tested it on animals last year, had to wait for months for the unblinding. “I’m thinking a lot about it,” he said in a Jan. 11 interview. “But, no, I don’t have champagne ready to go.”

After he learned the results, Dr. Barouch said he was delighted. “I think this vaccine will have a public health benefit throughout the world,” he said.

Johnson & Johnson is also moving forward with other trials of the vaccine to see how it can be improved. In December it began a trial with two doses. Dr. Fauci was optimistic that people who get a so-called prime boost may enjoy even more protection.

“If they get a prime boost, it’s entirely conceivable that they can get up to 90-plus percent,” he said.

In addition, Dr. Stoffels said that Johnson & Johnson was tailoring a version of its vaccine with a protein patterned after the B.1.351 variant. It could potentially deploy it in countries where that version of the virus was a threat.

“Pretty much all vaccine developers now are having that conversation,” said Dr. Peter J. Hotez, a vaccine expert with the Baylor School of Medicine and the creator of a different coronavirus vaccine.