Categories
Business

Electrical car agency Lucid Motors to go public in $11.eight billion blank-check merger

The Lucid Air sedan, which is slated to go into production at a facility in Arizona next year.

Clear

Electric vehicle company Lucid Motors plans to enter through a reverse merger with a blank check company founded by veteran investment banker Michael Klein with a combined equity value of $ 11.75 billion and a pro forma equity value of $ 24 billion to go the stock market.

The deal between Lucid of Newark, California, and Churchill Capital Corp IV is the largest in a series of such collaborations between EV companies and blank check companies, also known as Special Purpose Acquisition Companies or SPACs.

Previous SPAC deals with EV startups like Nikola, Fisker, and Lordstown Motors achieved pro forma valuations of less than $ 4 billion, but Lucid is further ahead than these companies. Lucid will deliver its first vehicle this spring – a luxury sedan named Air.

The deal will generate approximately $ 4.4 billion in cash for expansion plans for Lucid, including the current Arizona factory.

CCIV stocks fell roughly 30% to $ 40 in expanded trading.

Lucid is led by ex-Tesla engineering manager and automotive veteran Peter Rawlinson, who joined the company as Chief Technology Officer in 2013 before adding CEO to his duties in April 2019. He will continue these functions after the expected closing of the EU deal in the second quarter, according to the company.

Lucid was founded in 2007 as Atieva, a name it now uses for its technical and engineering division that supplies batteries for the Formula E electric circuit. The company initially focused on electric battery technology before changing its name to an electric vehicle manufacturer in 2016, three years after Rawlinson joined the company to lead technology development.

Lucid struggled with some difficulty raising capital to fund his plans until he received $ 1 billion from the Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund in September 2018.

Rawlinson described SPAC deals last year as easy money but not enough capital to get a vehicle into production, which has led companies like Fisker to look for contract manufacturers.

Prior to the announcement at Klein’s company, Rawlinson said the company had the funds to begin producing the air at a facility in Casa Grande, Arizona, southeast of Phoenix.

The new funding is intended to support Lucid in its expansion plans. Rawlinson expects the Air to be the catalyst for a number of future all-electric vehicles, including an SUV starting production in early 2023, and cheaper vehicles across the board.

Lucid currently employs almost 2,000 people. The US is expected to employ 3,000 people domestically by the end of 2022.

The deal includes a total investment of around $ 4.6 billion. It is funded with $ 2.1 billion in cash from CCIV and a fully committed PIPE of $ 2.5 billion at $ 15 per share from the Saudi Arabian state fund, as well as funds and accounts held by BlackRock, Fidelity and managed by others.

Categories
Business

A Shadowy however Highly effective Wall St. Agency Has Its Second in Washington

The GameStop saga was a David versus Goliath story, in which little traders competed against large hedge funds, and a cautionary story about what happens when fast-moving Silicon Valley collides with the highly regulated world of Wall Street.

Cast members include one of the most influential – and perhaps the least visible – personalities in the financial world, Chicago billionaire Kenneth C. Griffin.

And when the House Financial Services Committee meets on Thursday to interview key players in the GameStop madness, Mr Griffin will be asked about the two distinct roles his companies played in a two-week trading frenzy that created billions of dollars in wealth and destroyed.

The first company, Citadel, is a hedge fund firm that placed a small bet that GameStop stock would fall. It suffered as stocks rose as millions of small investors started buying up the stock, but not nearly as badly as another hedge fund, Melvin Capital, the Citadel, and some of its employees made a $ 2 billion investment in support of his finances.

The second company, Citadel Securities, is a broker who claims it handles more than a quarter of all stock trading in the United States. When retail investors furiously bought and sold GameStop stock – many of them through trading apps like Robinhood – Citadel did brisk business. It pays Robinhood and other retail brokers to process these orders, and makes money by pocketing tiny price differences between buy and sell orders that add up quickly.

“Citadel is one of the many truly gigantic financial companies that are incredibly important and woven throughout the financial system, but never visible to the public,” said Dennis M. Kelleher, president and CEO of Better Markets, a nonprofit group that supports this additional Financial regulation. “They operate in the shadows and they want to stay in the shadows and they don’t want anyone to pay attention to how they run their business.”

On Thursday, lawmakers will put Mr Griffin in the spotlight. He is – together with the directors of Robinhood and Reddit, the social media site – to testify before the House committee about the GameStop rally. Also on the list of witnesses are Keith Gill, a Reddit user and YouTube poster who made millions on his popular GameStop deal, and Gabe Plotkin, the founder and CEO of Melvin, who was bruised so badly that he became Citadels Help accepted.

In particular, Mr. Griffin has to deal with speculation that he used his companies’ stakes to manipulate the situation for his own benefit. Retail investors, irritated that Robinhood was restricting GameStop trading, suggested Citadel lag behind the boundaries, and put pressure on Robinhood to protect its own bet against the video game dealer – claims that both Citadel and Robinhood have denied to have.

“There’s a huge pachyderm walking around and that’s the crazy theory that we got Robinhood or some other company to impose trade restrictions on GameStop,” Griffin said in an interview on Wednesday. “Never in my life have I seen such a completely absurd theory.”

Representative Maxine Waters, the California Democrat who heads the committee, said the hearing – the first of three she has planned – was an information trip.

“They will tell their story,” she said of Citadel and the other witnesses. “We hope the hearing gives us some facts and a very clear understanding of who did what.”

For Mr. Griffin, who started trading at Harvard in his sophomore year, the answer to such questions depends precisely on which arm of his financial empire officials ask about.

Citadel – the hedge fund – had limited holdings of GameStop and other meme stocks, which have soared over the past month. On January 22, the Friday before GameStop went through the roof, Citadel’s bet against GameStop was limited to just 92 shares, said a person familiar with the company’s position at the time. However, after GameStop shot up, Mr. Griffin – one of the most accomplished operators in the financial world – discovered an opening in beleaguered Melvin.

One of Mr. Griffin’s lieutenants called Mr. Plotkin to show interest in an investment, Mr. Griffin said. At the end of the day, Citadel and Melvin had a handshake. Citadel and some of its executives would buy less than 10 percent of Melvin for $ 2 billion in cash, said a person who was familiar with the details of the transaction and had no authority to disclose confidential details about it. That money, along with $ 750 million from hedge fund Point72, allowed Melvin to weather heavy losses when GameStop – a stock he’d bet on – rose more than 600 percent.

Melvin’s losses were staggering: 53 percent in January. Citadel, which at the time had little risk for Melvin’s loss and a loss on its own GameStop investment, was down 3 percent. (The S&P 500 was down 1.1 percent over the month.)

However, the opportunity that GameStop’s rise offers for Mr. Griffin’s hedge funds has to do with the other role his companies play, particularly Citadel Securities. And here damaged investors smelled a conspiracy.

On the morning of January 28, Robinhood, the Silicon Valley startup that had become a target for small investors, throttled sales of GameStop and a few other stocks. The reasons were not fully explained and had the immediate effect of reversing the rally.

Users were angry – first with Robinhood and then with Citadel.

Some amateur traders, knowing that Citadel had already invested in Melvin and that Citadel Securities ran a huge trading operation of which Robinhood was a customer, jumped online to conspiracy theories. (The agreement, known as “Paying for Order Flow,” allows Robinhood and other app users to trade for free.)

“Little did I know Citadel had its hands in so many pockets !!” One commenter wrote on Reddit’s Wall Street Bets forum on Jan. 31, “Remember, they own some of Melvin’s capital! They tried to manipulate the market against us. “

Mr. Griffin said he and his team paid little attention to the online chatter because they were busy with the huge flood of trades. For example, on January 28, Citadel Securities traded 7.4 billion shares in total – roughly the same amount as the total volume of the exchange on any given day in 2019.

But when Mr. Griffin recognized the reputational risk of the rumor mill, he issued statements from both companies denying any role in Robinhood’s decision to restrict trade.

Citadel Securities had no commercial reason to slow or stop trading because of its business model, Griffin and other company officials said. The company bridges the tiny gap between a buy and sell price for a single stock order as a fee and slower trading that limits Citadel Securities’ ability to make money.

But the anti-Citadel vitriol hasn’t waned even after Robinhood’s chief executive Vlad Tenev presented the reason for the slowdown: The heavy trading of a wildly volatile stock by Robinhood’s users meant a large safety net payment was required to the industry-run clearinghouse who makes the deal.

Thursday’s hearing could provide more details on what was going on in the companies so closely linked to the GameStop rally, but it’s also likely that both parties are showing populist anger against both Robinhood and the Targets short sellers targeting GameStop.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a New York Democrat and member of the Financial Services Committee, said Robinhood’s decision to shut down some business for GameStop in January was “unacceptable.” And Representative Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat on the committee, called the decision “utterly absurd” and accused the app of “blocking the ability to trade to protect hedge funds.”

David McCabe contributed to the coverage.

Categories
World News

Robinhood CEO says it restricted shopping for in GameStop to ‘shield the agency and shield our prospects’

Robinhood Co-Founder and Co-CEO Vlad Tenev speaks on stage during the TechCrunch Disrupt New York event on May 10, 2016.

Noam Galai | Getty Images for TechCrunch

Vlad Tenev, CEO of Robinhood, said Robinhood’s attempt to stop trading certain speculative names is in the best interests of the company and its millions of users.

“In order to protect the company and our customers, we had to limit the purchase of these stocks,” Tenev told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin on Thursday evening.

“Robinhood is a brokerage firm, we have a lot of financial requirements. We have SEC net capital requirements and clearinghouse deposits. So this is money that we have to deposit with different clearing houses. Some of these requirements fluctuate significantly in the market and they can be in because of the volatility Given the current environment where there is a lot of volatility and a lot of concentrated activity in these names that have gone viral on social media, “Tenev said.

Tenev denied the firm had any liquidity issues, saying Robinhood had drawn on lines of credit as a proactive measure.

“We want to be able to enable our customers to be as unrestricted as possible in accordance with requirements and regulations,” said Tenev. “So we pulled these lines of credit so that we could maximize the funds we have to deposit with the clearing houses within a reasonable range.”

In the midst of a wild week of speculative retailing, Robinhood restricted trading in thirteen stocks, including GameStop and AMC Entertainment, on Thursday. The pioneer of free stock trading only allowed clients to sell positions in certain securities, no open messages, increased margin requirements and even said it would automatically close some positions if the client ran the risk of not having the required collateral.

“We haven’t seen this level of concentrated interest rate market on a small number of names before,” Tenev said. “We believe you should be able to buy and sell the stocks you want.”

Robinhood then said after Thursday’s closing bell that it would allow limited purchases of restricted stocks on Friday.

The broker’s original decision met with outrage from his group of loyal private investors. However, Robinhood stated the move was taken to meet the SEC’s capital requirements for broker-dealers.

“We saw unprecedented interest because the funding was culturally relevant in ways never seen before,” Tenev said. “Of course, Robinhood is about everyday investors. From the beginning we advocated open access investors. It hurts us to have to impose these restrictions and we will do everything we can to get these stocks trading as soon as possible enable.” As we can. “

Tenev said Robin’s decision was not made under the direction of a market maker or hedge fund.

GameStop stock closed 44% on Thursday after Robinhood restricted trading and rose more than 60% after the close of business after the decision to ease restrictions.

Subscribe to CNBC PRO for exclusive insights and analysis as well as live business day programs from around the world.

Categories
Politics

Biden brother touts relationship in Inauguration Day advert for regulation agency

President Joe Biden’s brother, Frank, promoted his relationship with the Commander-in-Chief in an Inauguration Day advertisement for the law firm he advised.

Frank Biden is a non-attorney senior advisor to the Berman Law Group. The company is based in Boca Raton, Florida. The Frank Biden ad was printed in the Jan. 20 Daily Business Review, also based in Florida.

The ad focuses on a lawsuit the company is bringing against a group of sugar cane companies in Florida. It includes a photo of Frank Biden as well as quotes on his relationship with the new president and family name.

In an email to CNBC, Frank Biden said he didn’t use his brother’s name to attract customers.

“I’ve never used my brother to get clients for my company. Our company has been involved for a long time [with] this lawsuit. Social justice is something I’ve been involved in for years, “said Frank Biden.” I will never be employed by a lobbyist or lobby company. “

After CNBC emailed the firm’s co-founders, Matthew Moore, one of the Berman Law Group’s attorneys, responded on behalf of the firm. CNBC asked the company if Frank Biden would continue to use the Biden name in future advertisements while his brother was president. The company’s answer provided no answers to these questions.

“Frank Biden has been with the Berman Law Group for years. He is committed to social justice and campaigns against corporate sizes that fall victim to the little guy,” said Moore in an email. “The Big Sugar Fall has been around for more than two years and it’s the flagship of corporate influence. We are honored to have Frank Biden with us as our social justice leader,” he added.

A White House spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.

Following the publication of this story, a White House official in Biden told CNBC that the president’s name should not be used in any commercial activity that suggests any form of endorsement or support.

“It is the policy of this White House that the president’s name should not be used in connection with any commercial activity, to suggest his endorsement or support, or to be understood in any way that could reasonably be implied,” the official said late Wednesday opposite CNBC.

The main focus of the ad is promoting the company’s work on a class action lawsuit against a group of sugar cane farmers in South Florida. The ad and Biden himself highlight the relationship with his brother, who is now president, as a reason to partner with the company.

“The two Biden brothers have long been committed to bringing environmental issues to the fore. The president-elect has vowed to rejoin the Paris Agreement and wants, for example, to set ambitious targets for reducing greenhouse gases,” the ad said in the newspaper.

“My brother is a role model for how to do this job,” says Frank Biden in the ad. “One of its central tenets is that one should never question or blame another man or woman’s motives. That way you avoid creating an inequality that prevents any clash. You can, of course, make the judgment of one Question people, and that’s what We bring to justice. “

The ad suggests that Frank Biden Company engaged because of Biden’s “reputation and motivation for engaging with philanthropic, social and environmental issues that arose”.

It then lists the company’s 800 phone number, along with contact information for Frank Biden and the company’s founders. The firm’s website states that they specialize in not only class actions, but also corporate law, real estate law, and government relations.

This is not the first time Frank Biden has announced his family name while his brother was in a position of power.

ABC News covered at length early last year on many occasions when he used his name to support affiliated companies and groups. In 2011, Frank Biden referred to his last name when his brother was vice president.

Politico and other outlets reported other attempts by members of the Biden family, including President’s son Hunter and his other brother James, to use their last name in business opportunities during the 2020 presidential election. Hunter Biden announced in December that he was being investigated by the Delaware federal prosecutor’s office on his “tax affairs”.

The January 20 ad with Frank Biden raised some concerns among political ethics experts.

Richard Painter, chief White House ethics attorney in the George W. Bush administration, said that while Frank Biden has the right to promote the Biden name, it doesn’t look good on him or the government.

The painter said either Biden or administrative officials should encourage Frank Biden not to use her name and convey the message to senior officials not to bother with him.

“The Biden White House must have a very strict protocol on the use of the Biden name,” Painter said in an interview with CNBC on Wednesday. “Brothers, law firm employees, and anyone else who uses the Biden name should not address the president or anyone else who works with the president.”

While working in the Bush administration, Painter worked as part of a team of attorneys who contacted legal representatives of Bush family members and employees to encourage them not to use their last name for business purposes.

Categories
World News

Apple invests $10 million in Harlem Capital VC agency

Early-stage venture capital firm Harlem Capital is receiving a $ 10 million investment as part of Apple’s Diversity Push.

Apple announced the investment on Wednesday as part of its plan to dedicate $ 100 million to racial justice and justice.

CEO Tim Cook originally announced the Racial Justice and Justice Initiative in June as one of several corporate responses to civil unrest following the murders of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor.

The funding will come over the next two decades and will help Harlem Capital achieve its goal of investing in 1,000 diverse companies in 20 years.

“We always try to get capital in relation to the population in the hands of the people,” said Jarrid Tingle, managing partner of Harlem Capital, in an interview on “Squawk Alley” of CNBC on Thursday.

The company currently has 21 investments in 11 cities and nine industries. Forty-three percent of companies are run entirely by women, and 47 percent by black or Latin American CEOs.

Companies in the company’s portfolio include black media company Blavity and government platform GovPredict.

The company previously received a portion of PayPal’s $ 50 million investment to fill the venture capital financing gap that black and Latin American entrepreneurs are facing.

According to a Crunchbase Diversity Spotlight report for 2020, the founders of Black and Latino accounted for only 2.6% of the total $ 87.3 billion in funding towards the end of 2020, though dollar amounts are increasing every year.

However, Tingle remained optimistic that the tide would turn.

“The time will come,” said Tingle. “The challenge is that they didn’t really get those opportunities until 2013 or 2014, so they never got the chance to get to the point where they would go public.”

While some experts point out a pipeline issue, Tingle said he doesn’t face it when identifying companies with different leadership skills. When Harlem Capital started an investment search, they found 200 women, black and Latino-run companies that had independently raised over $ 1 million.

“Our bet at Harlem Capital is that helping these entrepreneurs help them build businesses, create wealth, hire different people and then invest back when they are successful, and that happens,” said Tingle. “But we also believe that you cannot be what you cannot see.”

Categories
Business

Walmart to create fintech start-up with funding agency behind Robinhood

Cars drive past a Walmart store in Washington, DC on August 18, 2020.

Nicholas Comb | AFP | Getty Images

Walmart said Monday that a fintech startup is making it with Ribbit Capital, one of the venture capital firms behind Robinhood.

The big box dealer did not disclose the name of the new company, nor did they indicate when their services would be available. The company will develop unique and affordable financial products for Walmart employees and customers.

Shares rose more than 2% after close of trading on Monday. Walmart’s market cap is $ 416.7 billion.

The fintech startup will be majority-owned by Walmart and its board of directors will include several company executives including CFO Brett Biggs and Walmart’s US CEO John Furner. It said it will also appoint independent industry experts to the board and may acquire or work with other fintech companies.

“For years, millions of customers have trusted Walmart not only to save money shopping from us, but also to help them manage their financial needs,” Furner said in a press release. “And they made it clear that they want more from us in the financial services sector.”

With more than 4,700 stores across the country, Walmart interacts with millions of customers each year – including some who have no relationship with a bank or financial advisor.

Six percent of adults have no checking, savings, or money market accounts, according to the Federal Reserve. About 16% are “under-banked,” which means they have a bank account, but also use alternative financial services products such as a money order. These Americans are more likely to turn to short-term solutions like a pawn shop or payday loan, which can result in additional fees or high interest fees.

Walmart already offers some financial services to customers. For example, it has Walmart MoneyCard, a prepaid debit card that customers can top up with money and use to make purchases. The card has some features that will promote money management or help people who may have poor credit ratings, such as: B. No overdraft fees, no monthly fee and no minimum balance requirement.

The retailer also offers alternative payment plans for customers on a tight budget, e.g. B. Layaway and Affirm, a fintech company that allows customers to buy an online item instantly and pay for it in installments.

Walmart’s co-owner of the new venture, Ribbit Capital, has invested in fintech companies in the past. The portfolio includes Affirm; Robinhood, a royalty-free start-up; and Credit Karma, a company that offers consumer-friendly tools like free credit checks.