Categories
Health

New Findings on 2 Methods Kids Turn into Severely Ailing From the Coronavirus

A large nationwide study found important differences in the two main causes of serious illness in children from the coronavirus. These results can help doctors and parents better identify the conditions and understand more about the children at risk.

The study, published Wednesday in JAMA magazine, analyzed 1,116 cases of young people being treated in 66 hospitals in 31 states. Just over half of the patients had acute Covid-19, the predominantly lung-related disease that affects most adults with the virus, while 539 patients had the inflammatory syndrome, which in some children follows a typical mild one weeks Disease broke out, initial infection.

The researchers found some similarities, but also significant differences, in the symptoms and characteristics of the patients, who ranged from infants to 20-year-olds who were hospitalized between March 15 and October 31 last year.

Young people with the syndrome known as Pediatric Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome, or MIS-C, were more likely to be between 6 and 12 years old, while more than 80 percent of patients with acute Covid-19 were either younger than 6 years or older were as 12.

More than two-thirds of patients with both conditions were Black or Hispanic, which experts say most likely reflects socio-economic and other factors that some communities have disproportionately exposed to the virus.

“It is still shocking that the vast majority of patients are not white, and that goes for MIS-C and for acute Covid,” said Dr. Jean A. Ballweg, Medical Director, Pediatric Heart Transplant and Advanced Heart Failure at Children’s Hospital & Medical Center in Omaha, who was not involved in the study. “There are clearly racial differences.”

For unclear reasons, while Hispanic adolescents appeared to be equally at risk for both conditions, black children appeared to be at greater risk for developing the inflammatory syndrome than the acute disease, said Dr. Adrienne Randolph, the study’s lead author and a specialist in pediatric intensive care at Boston Children’s Hospital.

One possible clue that the authors mention is that in Kawasaki disease, a rare childhood inflammatory syndrome that shares similarities with some aspects of MIS-C, black children are more likely to have cardiac abnormalities and are less responsive to one of the standard treatments: intravenous Immunoglobulin.

The researchers found that young people with the inflammatory syndrome were significantly more likely to have no underlying illnesses than those with acute Covid. Nevertheless, more than a third of patients with acute Covid had no previous illness. “It’s not that previously healthy children are completely unscathed here,” said Dr. Randolph.

In the study, obesity was assessed separately from other underlying health conditions and only in patients 2 years and older. It found that a slightly higher percentage of young people with acute Covid were obese.

Updated

Apr. 26, 2021 at 1:54 am ET

Dr. Srinivas Murthy, an associate professor of pediatrics at the University of British Columbia who was not involved in the study, said he was not convinced the results show that healthy children are at higher risk for MIS-C. It could “mostly be a numbers game where the proportion of infected children and the proportion of healthy children is out there, instead of saying that healthy children have something immune that puts them at disproportionately higher risk,” he said.

Overall, the study’s documentation of the differences between the two conditions was useful, especially because it reflected “a reasonably representative group of hospitals in the US.”

Young people with the inflammatory syndrome were more likely to have had to be treated in intensive care units. Her symptoms more commonly included gastrointestinal problems and inflammation, as well as skin and mucous membranes. They were also much more likely to have heart problems, although many of the acute Covid patients didn’t get detailed heart exams, the study said.

About the same large proportion of patients with any disease – more than half – required airway support, with slightly less than a third of patients requiring mechanical ventilation. About the same small number of patients in each group died: 10 with MIS-C and eight with acute Covid-19.

The data does not reflect a recent surge in inflammatory syndrome cases that followed a surge in total Covid-19 infections across the country during the winter holiday season. Some hospitals have reported that there were more seriously ill MIS-C patients in the current wave compared to previous waves.

“I’ll be intrigued to see a comparison with this group from November 1st because I think we all felt that the kids with MIS-C have been even sicker lately,” said Dr. Ball path.

An optimistic sign from the study was that most severe heart problems in young people with inflammatory syndrome improved to normal within 30 days. Dr. However, Randolph said any remaining effects are still unknown, which is why one of her co-authors, Dr. Jane Newburger, assistant director of academic affairs in the cardiology department at Boston Children’s Hospital, conducted a statewide study to track children with inflammatory syndrome for up to five years.

“We can’t say 100 percent for sure that everything will be normal in the long run,” said Dr. Randolph.

Categories
Health

WHO outlines Wuhan findings on origins of Covid pandemic

Peter Ben Embarek and Marion Koopmans (R) come to a press conference on February 9, 2021 to conclude a visit by an international team of experts from the World Health Organization (WHO) to the city of Wuhan in the Chinese province of Hefei.

HECTOR RETAMAL | AFP | Getty Images

An international team of scientists led by the World Health Organization said Tuesday that the search for the introduction of the coronavirus was still in progress. Further research is needed to investigate how and whether the disease circulated in animals prior to human infection.

Scientists have been working in the Chinese city of Wuhan, where the disease was first identified, for four weeks, looking for clues to the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The research team has visited hospitals, laboratories, and markets including the Huanan Seafood Market, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and the laboratory of the Wuhan Center for Disease Control.

During the secret visit, researchers were also supposed to speak to early responders and some of the early patients. The team completed two weeks of quarantine before starting visiting local locations.

Dr. Peter Ben Embarek, WHO food safety and animal diseases specialist and chairman of the investigation team, told a press conference that the “most likely” path for Covid is to transition from an intermediate species in humans. That hypothesis will “require more study and more specific (and) targeted research,” he said.

The first results of the investigation found no evidence of major Covid outbreaks in Wuhan or anywhere else before December 2019. However, researchers found evidence of wider Covid spread outside the Huanan seafood market in the same month, Ben Embarek said.

He added that it was not yet possible to determine the intermediate animal host for the coronavirus and described the results as “in the works” after nearly a month of meetings and site visits.

“To understand what happened in the early days of December 2019, we dramatically changed the image we had before? I don’t think so,” said Ben Embarek.

“Have we improved our understanding? Have we added details to this story? Absolutely,” he said.

WHO has tried to meet expectations for a definitive conclusion on the origins of the Covid pandemic. To put the mission in a broader context, it took more than a decade to find the origins of SARS, while the origins of Ebola – first identified in the 1970s – are not yet known.

It is hoped that information on the earliest known cases of the coronavirus, first discovered in Wuhan in late 2019, can help pinpoint the start of the outbreak and prevent similar pandemics in the future.

After concerns about access and delays in issuing visas, the team led by the World Health Organization arrived in Wuhan on January 14 to work with Chinese scientists to investigate the origin of the coronavirus.

Laboratory leak “extremely unlikely”

A theory that the coronavirus leaked from the Wuhan Institute of Virology has been discredited by the research team. The hypothesis had been upheld by former President Donald Trump’s administration without any burden of proof and was strictly denied by Chinese officials.

“The hypothesis of a laboratory incident is extremely unlikely to explain the introduction of the virus into the human population,” said Ben Embarek. “Hence, it is not in the hypotheses that we will propose for future studies.”

Liang Wannian, head of the Covid expert panel at the Chinese National Health Commission, said on Tuesday, alongside Ben Embarek of the WHO from the Hilton Optics Valley Hotel in Wuhan, he agreed with this assessment.

The team had concluded that a laboratory leak should be considered extremely unlikely “on the basis of serious discussion and very careful research,” he added.

Mink are seen on a farm in Gjol, Northern Denmark on October 9, 2020.

HENNING BAGGER | Ritzau Scanpix | AFP via Getty Images

Liang said ongoing research into the origins of the virus needs to focus on how the virus circulated in animals before humans were infected.

Animal hosts have yet to be identified, but bats and pangolins are both potential candidates for transmission, Liang said, but samples from these species have not been found “sufficiently similar” to the Covid virus.

The high susceptibility of minks and cats to the Covid virus suggests that there may be other animals that act as reservoirs, Liang continued, but research is currently insufficient.

China’s national health commission spokesman said there could have been an unreported spread of the coronavirus before it was first discovered in Wuhan. However, Liang said there was no evidence of significant spread of Covid in Wuhan prior to the outbreak in late 2019.

International concern

The WHO previously cited genetic sequencing that showed the coronavirus had started in bats and likely jumped to another animal before infecting the human.

Many of the people who contracted the new virus in Wuhan, a city of around 11 million people, are said to have had connections to the Huanan fish market.

Scientists initially suspected the virus came from wildlife sold in the fish market, which prompted China to swiftly restrict public access to the market early last year.

China’s CDC has since said samples from the fish market suggest that the virus has spread from where the outbreak first occurred.

Additionally, China’s Liang said Tuesday that the Huanan Fish Market was one of the places where the coronavirus first appeared. However, he added that with current evidence it is impossible to determine how the virus was first introduced to the fish market.

Security guards stand guard outside the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan as members of the World Health Organization (WHO) team investigating the origins of the COVID-19 coronavirus visit the institute in Wuhan, central China’s Hubei Province, on February 3, 2021.

HECTOR RETAMAL | AFP | Getty Images

The origins of the coronavirus remain important as the virus is constantly evolving, as demonstrated by highly infectious mutant strains in the UK and South Africa.

To date, more than 106 million people worldwide have contracted the coronavirus and it has caused at least 2.32 million deaths, according to Johns Hopkins University.

The US has by far reported the highest number of confirmed Covid cases and deaths, with more than 27 million reported infections and 465,072 deaths.

China has released little information about its research into the origins of the coronavirus, and there has been widespread international concern about what researchers in Wuhan are allowed to see and do as part of their research.

– CNBC’s Evelyn Cheng contributed to this report.