Categories
Entertainment

Moufida Tlatli, Groundbreaker in Arab Movie, Dies at 78

Moufida Tlatli, the Tunisian director whose film “The Silences of the Palace” was the first international hit for a filmmaker from the Arab world in 1994, died on February 7th in Tunis. She was 78 years old.

Her daughter Selima Chaffai said the cause was Covid-19.

“The Silences of the Palace”, which Ms. Tlatli co-directed and wrote with Nouri Bouzid, is set in the mid-1960s, but mainly consists of flashbacks to a decade before Tunisia gained independence from France.

The protagonist, a young woman named Alia (played by Hend Sabri), reflects the impotence of women in this earlier era, including her mother Khedija (Amel Hedhili), a servant in the palace of Tunisian princes. Alias ​​memories show that even in the more liberated milieu of her time she has not achieved real autonomy.

“Silences” won several international awards, including a special mention in the best debut feature category in Cannes, which makes Ms. Tlatli the first female Arab director to be honored by this film festival. It was shown at the New York Film Festival later that year. Caryn James of the New York Times called it “a fascinating and accomplished film” in her review.

In an interview, Hichem Ben Ammar, a Tunisian documentary filmmaker, said “Silences” was “the first Tunisian film to hit the American market”.

Its importance was particularly great for women in the generally patriarchal film industry of the Arab world, said Rasha Salti, programmer at Arab film festivals. Although “Silences” wasn’t the first full-length film made by an Arab woman, “it has a visibility that outshines the achievements of others,” she said.

Moufida Ben Slimane was born on August 4, 1942 in Sidi Bou Said, a suburb of Tunis. Her father Ahmed worked as a decorative painter and craftsman in the palaces of the Tunisian nobility. Her mother Mongia was a housewife. Moufida, one of six children, looked after her younger siblings. As a teenager, she spent nights at a local movie theater watching Indian and Egyptian dramas.

She grew up in a time of social reform under the Tunisian President Habib Bourguiba, an advocate for women’s rights. In high school, Moufida’s philosophy teacher introduced her to the work of Ingmar Bergman and other European directors. In the mid-1960s she received a scholarship to the Institute for Advanced Cinematographic Studies in Paris. After graduating, she lived in France until 1972 and worked as a script supervisor.

In Tunisia, Ms. Tlatli was admired as a film editor and worked on classics of Arab cinema such as “Omar Gatlato” and “Halfaouine”. “Silences” was her debut as a director.

The theme of silence in the film is dramatized by the servant Khedija’s refusal to reveal her father’s identity to Alia. Alia never solves this riddle, but she sees a brutal reality: how her mother had quietly suffered from sexual ties to the two princes of the palace.

Silence is a hallmark of palace culture. During music lessons in the garden and at ballroom parties, aristocrats hold small talk and servants say nothing. Discretion means meekness. The same discretion, however, also veils the palace’s sexual violence and muzzles its victims. Servants learn to communicate with one another through grimaces or looks.

“All women follow the tradition of taboo, of silence, but the power of their looks is extraordinary,” said Ms. Tlatli in an interview with the British magazine Sight & Sound in 1995. “You had to get used to expressing yourself through their eyes.”

Ms. Tlatli discovered that this “culture of the indirect” was ideally suited to the medium of film.

“That’s why the camera is so amazing,” she said. “It is in complete harmony with this rather suppressed language. A camera is a bit smart and hidden. It’s there and can capture small details about something you’re trying to say. “

After “Silences”, Ms. Tlatli directed “The Season of Men” (2000), which also follows women of different generations who grapple with deeply rooted social customs. Her last film was “Nadia and Sarra” (2004).

In 2011, Ms. Tlatli was briefly Minister of Culture in the transitional government that took over Tunisia after the overthrow of the dictator Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali. “She has respect not only as a filmmaker and film editor, but also because she was not co-opted by the system,” said Ms. Salti, the film programmer.

In addition to her daughter, Ms. Tlatli survives her husband Mohamed Tlatli, a businessman involved in oil and gas exploration. a son, Walid; and five grandchildren.

Ms. Tlatli was inspired to make her own film after giving birth to Walid and leaving him with her mother according to Tunisian tradition, even though her mother already looked after four of her own sons. Her mother had been a “quiet woman” for a long time, Ms. Tlatli told The Guardian in 2001, before developing Alzheimer’s disease and losing her voice.

Her mother’s life has become “unbearable, exhausting, suffocating”.

Ms. Tlatli spent seven years outside of the film raising her children and helping her mother. The experience made her feel that there were unexamined gaps between women of different generations, similar to the one she portrayed in “Silences” between mother and daughter.

“I wanted to speak to her and it was too late,” she said in 1995 of her mother. “I projected all of this onto my daughter and thought: Maybe she didn’t feel close to me. That gave me the urgency to do this film. “

Lilia Blaise contributed to reporting from Tunis.

Categories
Entertainment

Amazon Strikes From Movie Business’s Margins to the Mainstream

“These films kept coming out number 1,” Ms. Salke said, referring to the films’ performance on Amazon Prime. “Every time we started one, the next one obscured the next. We trained our audiences to know that we would have great original films that are more commercial on Prime Video. It’s a bit of a “if you build it, they’ll come” strategy. “

But what happens to this plan when the pandemic is over and studios are no longer ready to sell their films to streaming platforms?

Amazon has around 34 films in various stages of production around the world, and Ms. Salke said the company is determined to spend more than $ 100 million on a production if it is earned. (Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is stepping down as CEO of the company this year, but the studio doesn’t expect much of a change if Andy Jassy takes over the reins.)

The complex in Culver City, California is still under construction and investments have tended to increase. Ms. Salke points to Aaron Sorkin’s upcoming film about Lucy and Desi Arnaz, with Nicole Kidman and Javier Bardem as a potential hit. There is also George Clooney’s film “The Tender Bar” with Ben Affleck and a romantic LGBTQ drama “My Policeman” with Harry Styles and Emma Corrin (“The Crown”).

“The new news is that in the future we will be adopting some larger, self-generated projects,” she said.

In Ms. Salke’s eyes, this was always where Amazon Film would land. And there is a renewed confidence in her attitude as she celebrates her third anniversary as head of the studio. In addition to her most recent acquisition, she has entered into general content deals with Mr. Jordan and actor and musician Donald Glover, which she believes will strengthen her mission to improve Amazon’s reputation as a talent-friendly place.

With its healthy subscription base, Amazon attracts those in Hollywood interested in the company’s global reach, but also curious about the company’s other companies that have the potential to grow a star’s brand beyond film and television.

Categories
Entertainment

‘Un Movie Dramatique’ Overview: College students Report the Paris Suburbs

In the documentary “Un Film Dramatique”, the artist Éric Baudelaire fulfills the task of creating a special work of art for Dora Maar, a newly built secondary school in the Paris suburb of Saint-Denis. For the project, Baudelaire filmed 21 students over four years and encouraged them to take the camera themselves. The finished film shows the liveliness and generosity that can emerge from bourgeois art.

The film passes in informal episodes. The filmmakers organized games and debates, and encouraged their classmates to discuss what they think the film will be about. Students consider what it means to be the subject and creator of a documentary and, in turn, calculate how their school fits into the world around them.

These youths are workers, often the children of immigrants, and they mock the bad reputation Saint-Denis has in Paris. With cameras in hand, they make their own record of what life is like in the suburbs. They dance, they sing, they offer house tours. Every child is confident, curious and cooperative.

The film has a patchwork quality that results from getting in and out from the perspective of different people. Some scenes are exciting when the Franco-Romanian student Gabriel-David debates through his Franco-Ivorian classmate Guy-Yanis what it means to have a country of origin if you have never lived there. But just as many sequences are banal – children film themselves watching TV as if they were streaming live on Instagram.

It is the cumulative effect of seeing the world through the eyes of these children that makes this film so profoundly joyful. This is an encouraging project, a philosophical excavation of a school marked by playful optimism.

A dramatic film
Not rated. In French with subtitles. Running time: Running time: 1 hour 54 minutes. Watch virtual cinemas.

Categories
Entertainment

Sundance Diary, Half 2: The Promise of Music in a Highly effective Movie

AO Scott, our critic in general, keeps a journal while attending the virtual Sundance Film Festival, which runs through Wednesday. Read part 1 here.

Friday, 1am: It’s been almost exactly a year since I took a plane, almost as long since I’ve been to a movie theater, and many months since I got up after midnight. The Sundance premier screenings are held in three-hour windows, which makes the start time flexible. I was able to wash some dishes before deciding to go sightseeing in the evening. And of course the pause button is available for snack or bathroom breaks.

Normally I would skip an event like “Opening Night Welcome”, but I checked into this short program of zoom-in greetings and video montages to mark the line between everyday life and festival. I also wanted to take a look at Tabitha Jackson, the festival director, when she added a new entry to her list of premieres. She is the first woman to lead Sundance and the first person of color and person to be born outside the United States in this role. And now she’s also the first to run an online festival.

Over the past few years, I might have found her brief remarks a little cheesy, evoking the strength of community and the power of storytelling. Instead, I was moved and touched by the greetings from festival goers waving from their living rooms in Austin, Denver, New York, and elsewhere. Human connection cannot be taken for granted these days.

Then I saw two films, one of which blew me away. I will concentrate on emphasizing the positive in the usual festival spirit. Directed by Ahmir Thompson, better known to music fans as Questlove, this is a documentary entitled “Summer of Soul” about the 1969 Harlem Cultural Festival.

This event is sometimes referred to as “Black Woodstock”, but the parallel is a bit misleading and describing “Summer of Soul” as a concert film doesn’t do it justice. I mean, it captures some absolutely fascinating musical performances – from Stevie Wonder, the Staples Singers, Max Roach, Nina Simone, Ray Barretto, and Sly and the Family Stone, among others – but it anchors them in a vibrant and intricate tableau of politics, Culture and city life.

Thompson uses archival footage and recent interviews wisely to contextualize long-lost footage of the festival itself, which ran over several summer weekends, including the day the moon landed. He contends that what happened in Harlem was at least as significant and should be remembered as a turning point in black history (as well as the history of New York, America and musicals).

More than 50 years later, when enthusiastic summer crowds and live performances are out of reach, it is a reminder of what is possible and the power and promise of popular art in troubled times.

Categories
Entertainment

Lawmakers Push for ‘Selena’ to Be Added to Nationwide Movie Registry

First there was Selena Quintanilla-Pérez, the pioneering Latina singer who inspired a generation of artists and was killed on the cusp of national fame. Then there was Selena, the movie that polished her legend and brought another Latina artist to fame.

Tribute albums, a Netflix series, and podcasts followed, and now, more than two decades after the film was released in 1997, a group of lawmakers are pushing for “Selena” to be listed on the national film register, declaring that his Taking up pressure on Hollywood could increase Latino representation in the ranks of the industry. The legislature’s efforts have been welcomed by film and Latino study experts, who said it was long overdue.

“It’s a recognition of Chicana and Latina talent in acting and representation,” said Theresa Delgadillo, professor of Chicana and Latina studies at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, “and a music innovator at the center.”

Ms. Quintanilla-Pérez broke into the male-dominated Tejano music industry in Texas, winning critical admiration, large following, and then a Grammy in 1994. A year later, only 23, she was shot dead by the founder of her fan club. Her English-language debut “Dreaming of You” was released posthumously.

For over a quarter of a century after her death, Ms. Quintanilla-Pérez remains a pop culture icon, especially among Mexicans and Latinos from her native Texas. At Spotify, she has more than five million listeners a month. “This month the Grammys will honor her with a special merit award.

But the 1997 film with Jennifer Lopez as Selena and Edward James Olmos as her Father, deserves credit too, said Representative Joaquin Castro, a Texas Democrat who leads the effort in Congress. In an interview, he said that Latino creators and their stories are too often pushed aside by gatekeepers of American culture like Hollywood and the national register, and that Latinos in all media are too often portrayed by negative stereotypes such as gang members, drug dealers, and hypersexualized women.

“Hollywood is still the picture-defining institution in the United States,” Castro said of his project for a more balanced representation. “All of us walking around with brown skin or a Spanish surname have to face the stereotypes and narratives created by American media, and historically some of the worst stereotypes have come out of Hollywood.”

In a letter from the 38 members of the Hispanic Caucus in Congress, Castro wrote that “the exclusion of Latinos from the film industry” “reflected the way Latinos continue to be excluded from America’s full promise – a problem that is yet to be resolved when our stories can be fully told. “

He said the National Film Registry could “help break down this exclusion by preserving important cultural and artistic examples of American Latino heritage”.

Each year a committee selects 25 films to be included in the national register established by Congress in 1988. Of the 800 films in the register, at least 17 are examples of Latino stories, including “El Norte”, “The Devil Never” Sleep “ and “Real women have curves,” said Brett Zongker, a spokesman for the Library of Congress. From 11 Latino directors on the list, 9 are men and two are women.

Although the film register tries to reflect the diversity in America, Zongker said, “Unfortunately, women and people with color are underrepresented in film history, especially as directors.”

The gap between Americans and the main cast extends to speaking roles. Although Latinos are the largest minority group in the United States, making up 18.5 percent of the population, a 2019 study found found that only 4.5 percent of all speaking characters in 1,200 highest-grossing films from 2007 to 2018 were Latino.

Mr Castro said he is still collecting entries on other films to submit, but “Selena” as a particularly loved film is the focus of efforts. Frederick Luis Aldama, a Latino film and television professor at Ohio State University, said the film “shows the complexity, dignity, humanity, and wealth of a Latino father and daughter, and it really shows us that we are not just the ‘bad hombres, as the twitter feeds have told the world over the past few years. “

Whether the film register accepts it or not, a wave of appreciation for the work of Ms. Quintanilla-Pérez has gripped the entertainment industry.

“They have these kind of artists that we lost when they flourished,” said Daniel Chavez, professor of Latin American studies at the University of New Hampshire. “These young characters become mythical in a way.”

In addition to the upcoming Grammy, Ms. Quintanilla-Pérez was recognized in the National Recording Registry last year for her 1990 album “Ven Conmigo”. The Netflix show “Selena: The Series” premiered last year and will return in May. And a podcast about her legacy titled “Anything for Selena” released its first episodes last week.

The podcast host Maria Elena Garcia said that as a young girl struggling with her identity, she was inspired by how Ms. Quintanilla-Pérez took on her Mexican and American heritage without apology.

“She was whole in both places,” Ms. Garcia said in an interview. “Although she didn’t sound like Mexican-born people, she told them it was, and I can say, my heritage. It was incredibly profound to me, even though I was a little girl. “

When Ms. Garcia saw her success, she added on the podcast and felt like “she brought us with her”.

It was this sense of representation for young Latinas that drove filmmaker Gregory Nava to direct Selena, he said. While pondering whether to make the film in the mid-1990s, Mr. Nava remembered a walk in Los Angeles and saw two young Mexican girls wearing Selena t-shirts. “Why do you love Selena?” he asked her.

“Because she looks like us,” they said.

“Our stories need to be told,” said Mr Nava in an interview. “These young girls that I made ‘Selena’ for are all grown up and have young girls and they need nicer pictures of who we are.”

Some scenes from “Selena” have proven to be big for many Latinos, like one in which Mrs. Quintanilla-Pérez and her father Abraham Quintanilla talks about the problems Mexicans face when they simply speak English and Spanish for different audiences.

“Being Mexican-American is tough,” says Mr. Olmos as Mr. Quintanilla. “Anglos jump over you if you don’t speak perfect English. Mexicans jump over you if you don’t speak Spanish perfectly. We have to be twice as perfect as everyone else. “

In the end, Ms. Quintanilla-Pérez became an idol for many Mexicans and Americans alike, but the effect of the film is probably felt most strongly in Texas, the singer’s homeland. “Selena” was made on a small budget, said Mr. Nava. When trying to re-enact Ms. Quintanilla-Pérez’s last appearance at the Houston Astrodome, he reached out to the ward for help.

“I insisted we shoot in Texas because I wanted to shoot in their country,” said Mr. Nava. “She was the earth, sky and sun of Texas.”

In newspaper advertisements, he asked the community to dress as if they were going to the opening concert of Ms. Quintanilla-Pérez’s concert. Mr. Nava said more than 35,000 people showed up.

And droves came out for other scenes, including an additional one who was later elected to Congress, Mr. Castro.

Categories
Entertainment

Good Luck Is a Curse in This Traditional Movie From Senegal

Neorealism was born in post-war Italy. However, in the mid-1950s, the largest examples were made abroad. “Mandabi” (“The Payment Order”), the second feature film by the dean of the West African filmmaker Ousmane Sembène (1923-2007), is one of them. Filmed with a cast of non-professionals on the streets of Dakar, Senegal, it’s a pickling fable of happiness gone bad. The newly restored film from 1968 can be streamed from the Film Forum from January 15th.

“Stop killing us with hope,” exclaims one of the two women of the dignified but unhappy protagonist of the film, Ibrahima, a devout Muslim who has not worked for four years. The postman just told them that out of the blue a money order from Ibrahima’s nephew had arrived in Paris.

News travels fast. Needy neighbors, not to mention the local imam, arrive with their hands outstretched. In the meantime, Ibrahima learns that he must have ID in order to redeem the money order. In order to receive an ID, he needs a birth certificate. To get a birth certificate, he has to have a friend in court – don’t mention a photo and the money to get one. Being illiterate, Ibrahima will also need someone to explain each procedure. Dakar was once the command center for the African colonies of France and has no shortage of bureaucrats.

While it is never clear how Ibrahima managed to support two women, seven children, and his own vanity in a city where fresh water is a cash asset, his wives wait for him as if he were a baby. A real child whines off camera as Ibrahima is pampered, but a deeper irony involves his identity. His mission to cash his nephew’s money order shows that, at least in the official sense, he doesn’t have one. Worse still, his quest for a stroke of luck that doesn’t even belong to him sets him up as a sign of all kinds of cheaters, hustlers and thieves – in a word, society in general.

Most of the people Ibrahima encounters are consumed with selfishness. “Mandabi”, however, is quite generous – rich in detail, a feast for the eyes and ears. The colors are vivid and saturated; The theme song was a local hit until the Senegalese government apparently recognized its subversive power and banned it from the radio. (Based on a short story by Senegal’s first president, Léopold Sédar Senghor, the film has a complicated relationship to authority, which may be responsible for the less than convincing optimism of its pinned ending.)

New York Times film critic Roger Greenspun reviewed “Mandabi” when it was shown at the 1969 New York Film Festival and wrote, “As a comedy dealing with the misery of life, it exhibits a controlled sophistication.” Indeed, “Mandabi” may at first seem like a story from Kafka or the Book of Job, but essentially criticizes a post-colonial system that pits classes against classes in the exploitation of almost all classes.

It is also a satire of self-deception. Years ago, Sembène told two Film Quarterly interviewers that “Mandabi” had been shown all over Africa “because every other country claims that what happens in the film only happens in Senegal.”

Available for screening January 15; filmforum.org.

Categories
Business

Studios experiment with launch fashions what meaning for movie piracy

A photographic illustration of pirated copies being illegally downloaded with the legal music service iTunes in the background in London, England.

Matthew Lloyd | Getty Images

2021 will be a completely different year for the cinema business. Hoping to find ways to make a profit from big budget blockbusters, new methods of film publishing have turned.

For Warner Bros., the pandemic led parent company AT&T to decide to release all films in theaters and on HBO Max on the same day. Universal, owned by Comcast, has chosen to sign contracts with individual theaters to reduce the time their films have to stay in theaters before they switch to premium video-on-demand.

Then there are those like Disney, who have largely postponed the majority of their films to 2021 and put a handful on their own streaming service.

But box office analysts won’t be the only ones watching closely how these films perform over the next year. Piracy experts are excited to see how these new publishing methods will affect illegal streaming.

“As a data science researcher, this is a dream,” said Brett Danaher, professor of entertainment analysis and data science at Chapman University. “It’s such a great experiment.”

Heading into 2021, piracy experts told CNBC that they have theories about how pirates will react to these different models, but aren’t entirely sure what will happen.

What we know about piracy

For one thing, piracy is difficult to track. Experts can track some downloads from major piracy websites, but once this file is downloaded it can be privately distributed and streamed to thousands of other viewers.

It’s also why experts make a range of claims that piracy could cost the US economy, rather than a fixed number. Last year, the Global Innovation Policy Center estimated that global online piracy cost the US economy between $ 29.9 billion and $ 71 billion in lost revenue each year.

But you can learn a lot from people who are pirates. Looking at the data, experts like Andy Chatterley, CEO and co-founder of MUSO, a global authority on digital piracy, can provide insights to media companies around the world.

For one thing, Chatterley noted that the bigger the buzz around a blockbuster, the more piracy it will see. Films with large marketing campaigns, pent-up inquiries from enthusiastic fans and a lot of media exposure lead to more illegal online downloads.

MUSO’s data also suggests that piracy will increase as higher quality versions of films become available on piracy sites. For example, “Bad Boys for Life” came out in theaters in January and saw a “pretty mild” amount of piracy, Chatterley said. However, when it became available on video-on-demand in mid-March, there was a huge surge in online piracy.

Conversely, Disney’s “Mulan,” which immediately went streaming, saw a massive spike and then a fall in overtime on its release day.

“The piracy was front loaded,” Chatterley said. “But the piracy wasn’t necessarily bigger or smaller.”

How to prevent illegal downloads

For companies like AT&T that release high quality versions of films on day one, there are a few ways to prevent piracy. For example, the film was released in theaters and on HBO Max internationally two weeks before the North American debut of “Wonder Woman 1984”.

This allowed audiences to see the film in theaters first before a high quality copy was released on piracy websites. This is especially important as HBO Max is currently only a domestic product.

“Of course there are people who always become pirates,” said Michael Smith, professor of information technology and marketing at Carnegie Mellon University. “The people you worry about are the people who would have legally bought your content but found it [piracy] is more convenient. “

People wearing masks walk past a billboard for the film ‘Wonder Woman 1984’. Photo taken on December 26th, 2020.

Simon Shin | SOPA pictures | LightRocket via Getty Images

Smith said the majority of pirates do this because they have no other legal way to consume a product. Had these viewers been given an easier legal route, they would have paid to watch the film.

While online piracy can have a negative financial impact on media companies, the data experts gathered can also help those companies determine what their audiences want to see. Data from groups like MUSO can tell companies which films or TV shows to buy or license domestically or in international locations.

For example, the European Union Intellectual Property Office found that “The Mummy” was disproportionately pirated in Spain and the TV show “South Park” was a popular illegal download in Finland.

This information tells Universal that “The Mummy” may be made more widely available in Spain and Viacom in order to sign a contract with a Finnish streaming service.

What could happen in 2021

As Danaher said, 2021 will be a big experiment for the industry when it comes to piracy. It is the first time that several different release strategies are carried out simultaneously and over a longer period of time.

While some titles are more popular than others, the data should include trends that show how people are consuming their entertainment.

As in the previous year, it will be difficult for experts to pinpoint a clear financial impact, especially since the pandemic is likely to have an impact on how people watch certain films. Those who cannot go to the theaters may opt for legal streaming when available, but choose illegal methods for big movies instead.

With premium video-on-demand becoming an option to buy sooner than usual, it may not be immediately clear whether on-demand buying or piracy is cannibalizing theater revenue.

“Unfortunately, I can’t tell you who will win the horse race,” said Danaher.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC.

Categories
Business

Marvel Girl 1984 opening weekend results in fast-tracked third movie

Gal Gadot plays Wonder Woman in “Wonder Woman 1984”.

Warner bros.

“Wonder Woman 1984” hit theaters on Christmas Day, securing the highest box office opening of any domestic film since the coronavirus pandemic crippled the entertainment industry in mid-March.

On Sunday, Warner Bros. announced that the film was worth $ 16.7 million in the United States and Canada. “Wonder Woman 1984” was one of the first major Hollywood blockbusters to be released in theaters and streaming on the same day.

Simultaneous release should accommodate a limited number of open theaters, limited seating capacity, and a broad public that continues to be afraid of returning to theaters.

Warner & Bros. mom AT&T said Sunday that nearly half of HBO Max subscribers saw “Wonder Woman 1984” on Christmas Day. Retail subscribers are those who purchase the streaming service directly, not through a cable or other streaming subscription.

As of October, HBO Max had around 3.6 million direct retail customers. It is unclear how many additional subscribers the company gained prior to the release of Wonder Woman 1984 on the platform.

“Wonder Woman 1984 broke records in the first 24 hours of service and exceeded our expectations for all major ad and subscriber metrics. The interest and momentum we’re seeing suggest this is likely well beyond the weekend will continue, “said Andy Forssell, executive vice president and general manager of WarnerMedia’s direct-to-consumer division. “In these very difficult times, it was nice to give families the opportunity to enjoy this uplifting movie at home where going to the theater wasn’t an option.”

The movie’s box office hit prompted the studio to accelerate a third installment in the Wonder Woman franchise, the company said. It’s written and directed by Patty Jenkins, who directed the previous two films and made it clear to the New York Times last week that she wouldn’t be returning to the franchise if a theatrical model wasn’t possible for the film.

At the beginning of the weekend, analysts weren’t sure the film could top the nearly $ 10 million that “The Croods: A New Age” had secured on the opening weekend during Thanksgiving. There were concerns that HBO Max audience numbers could be grossly cannibalizing ticket sales.

Despite the gross grossing, fans and critics are concerned about Warner Bros.’s DC Extended Universe.

A week before its US debut, Wonder Woman 1984 had a rating of 88% “Fresh” out of 92 reviews on the Rotten Tomatoes review page. As of Sunday afternoon, that score dropped from 285 ratings to 65%.

While the film’s star, Gal Gadot, received widespread acclaim, the film itself has been condemned for its poor story, plot inconsistencies, and inferior CGI.

For comparison, the first Wonder Woman movie released in 2017 scored 93%, the highest of any movie in the DC Extended Universe. Private watch parties and large format screens like IMAX and Dolby were the most popular way for moviegoers to see the latest movie over the vacation weekend, the company said.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. NBCUniversal owns Dreamworks Animation, the studio behind The Croods: A New Age, and Rotten Tomatoes.

Correction: Warner Bros. mom AT&T said Sunday that nearly half of HBO Max subscribers saw “Wonder Woman 1984” on Christmas Day.

Categories
Business

What the superhero movie could make

Gal Gadot plays Wonder Woman in “Wonder Woman 1984”.

Warner bros.

Can a nostalgic superhero movie convince people to leave their couches and go to the theaters? “Wonder Woman 1984” tries to answer this question.

Cinema owners are confident that the sequel to Wonder Woman, due out on Christmas Day, will attract a major demographic back to theaters despite the continued surge in coronavirus cases.

The ongoing pandemic isn’t their only concern, however. The same day that “Wonder Woman 1984” debuted on the big screen, it can also be streamed on HBO Max.

“Wonder Woman 1984 is the first test of a title of this size being released on both large and small screen at the same time,” said Paul Dergarabedian, Comscore senior media analyst.

Box office analysts have mixed opinions about how well the film will perform at the home box office. “Wonder Woman 1984” fell short of expectations on its international debut last weekend, grossing around $ 38.5 million. That was well below the industry’s predicted $ 60 million.

The movie could have even more trouble in the US and Canada considering that only around 34% of the theaters are open. That’s about 2,000 theaters, reports Comscore.

“It is difficult to place a number on its possible opening weekend as there really is no directly comparable release scenario,” said Dergarabedian. “And the biggest opening weekend for cinemas since the pandemic began in mid-March has not even passed the $ 10 million mark.”

It is related to “The Croods: A New Age,” an animated film by Dreamworks that debuted over Thanksgiving. It had the highest opening of any movie released during the pandemic, at just $ 9.7 million. The estimated $ 14.2 million for the entire five-day Thanksgiving weekend.

Still there is a pent-up demand for “Wonder Woman 1984”. This could convince moviegoers to go to the big screen instead of watching the movie at home.

“We’re seeing ‘Wonder Woman 1984′ getting the highest advance ticket sales of any movie in the pandemic era, but I’m cautiously leaning over $ 10 million for that, given the number of theater closings, audiences’ caution and caution A simultaneous streaming release weekend, “said Shawn Robbins, chief analyst at Boxoffice.com. “A number closer to $ 15 million could be achievable, but there is a lot of unpredictability that needs to be considered right now.”

Robbins said premium screens like IMAX and Dolby Cinema are likely to be among the top performing venues for the sequel as they offer higher quality sound and picture. Private party rentals, where moviegoers rent a theater to a group of up to 20 friends and family members, are also likely to generate a healthy share of the box office.

For the past five years, the box office has generated at least $ 80 million for a single day on Christmas Day. Analysts agree that that number won’t be seen this year.

In times without a pandemic, “Wonder Woman 1984” could have opened between $ 100 million and $ 150 million, said Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter. With so many movie theaters closed, the coronavirus threat looming, and the film available on HBO Max, Pachter forecast an opening of between $ 15 million and $ 25 million.

“While many choose to stay home and watch the movie this vacation, fans and families might find themselves in relatively fair numbers in markets where it is safe and possible, although far from what they are Usually for a blockbuster superhero, sequels are opening at Christmas, “said Robbins.

Disclosure: Comcast is the parent company of NBCUniversal and CNBC. NBCUniversal owns Dreamworks Animation.

Categories
Entertainment

Barbara Windsor, Beloved British TV and Movie Star, Dies at 83

LONDON – Barbara Windsor, a star of the “Carry On” films and long-running BBC soap opera “EastEnders”, whose dirty staccato laugh and ability to embody the life of the working class brought her to the collective memory of Britain, died on December 10th in a nursing home here. She was 83 years old.

Her death was announced in a statement from her husband and sole immediate survivor, Scott Mitchell, who said the cause was Alzheimer’s disease.

As a sign of the impact Ms. Windsor has had on Britain’s cultural life over the past six decades, royal family members have been among those paying tribute on social media, as has Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who wrote on Twitter that Ms. Windsor was “Cheered the world up with her own British brand of harmless cheek and innocent scandals.”

Ms. Windsor also made an impact in the United States, if only briefly, when she appeared on Broadway in 1964 in “Oh! What a fine war, ”Joan Littlewood’s music hall-style show that used disrespectful World War I songs to mock the absurdity of conflict.

Some American theatergoers may have found Ms. Windsor’s Cockney accent difficult to understand – one of her earliest films, “Sparrow’s Can’t Sing,” which was subtitled at some screenings in New York – but she won a Tony Award for Best Performance nominated actress in a musical.

In 1970 she told a BBC interviewer that she really wanted to do a movie in Hollywood, preferably a comedy with Jack Lemmon. “That would be great, wouldn’t it?” She said. She did not achieve that particular ambition but was soon immortalized in British cinemas thanks to her roles in the quirky, allusive and hugely successful “Carry On” films.

She later became even better known for her role as the matriarchal landlady Peggy Mitchell in “EastEnders,” a character she repeatedly portrayed from 1994 to 2016. She stopped when her Alzheimer’s disease made it impossible to continue.

Ms. Windsor was born Barbara Ann Deeks on August 6, 1937 in Shoreditch, then part of the working class in East London. Her father, John, a bus driver, and mother, Rose, a seamstress, had a tumultuous marriage, and by age 15, Ms. Windsor had to testify about their disputes in a divorce negotiation.

As a child during World War II, she was evacuated to Blackpool, a seaside resort in northern England. There, in her 2001 autobiography, All About Me: My Extraordinary Life, she revealed that she first stayed with a family that tried to sexually abuse her before moving in with a friend whose mother sent them both to dance classes. The mother was so impressed with her talent that she wrote a letter to Ms. Windsor’s parents asking them to go to London to teach them. “She’s a real show,” reads the letter Ms. Windsor recalled in the 1970 BBC interview.

Back in London, Ms. Windsor was discovered by a talent agent trying to cast her in a pantomime, the particularly British form of theater popular at Christmas, but her school refused to give her time off. She eventually went to drama school, where teachers repeatedly tried – and failed – to get her to lose her accent.

Despite the promise Ms. Windsor made, her break didn’t come until 1960 when she traveled to East London to audition for a role in Ms. Littlewood’s theatrical workshop, a company whose works often brought the life and humor of the working class to the stage. The recognition she received for her work there soon led to appearances on television and then in film, where she was hailed for her hackneyed roles in the “Carry On” comedies.

In these films, the camera often focused on the short (4-foot-11) but buxom Ms. Windsor’s figure. She is probably best remembered for a scene in “Carry On Camping” (1969) where her bikini top flies off during an outdoor aerobics class (an assistant peeled the top off with a fishing line during filming). This clip has since been shown several times on British television.

Although Ms. Windsor succeeded on screen, her personal life was in trouble. She had connections with a number of famous men, including soccer player George Best and East London gangsters Reggie and Charlie Kray. In 1964 she married Ronnie Knight, another gangster who was tried in 1980 for ordering a killer to murder his brother’s killer (he was acquitted), and in 1983 she married £ 6 million (more than £ 17 million or so) had stolen $ 23 million in today’s money) from a security deposit and fled to Spain.

Her relationship with Mr. Knight caused a nervous breakdown, she told the BBC in a 1990 interview. This marriage and a subsequent marriage ended in divorce.

Her life picked up again in the 1990s after she starred as Peggy Mitchell in EastEnders, the popular sink soap opera, whose storylines often reflected social themes.

She quickly became one of the stars of the show, known for beating her co-stars when the plot called for a climatic moment and for storylines that could be far darker than anything you could find in a “carry on” – Movie would find. (In 2010, one of her character’s sons burned the pub down in the middle of a crack cocaine binge.)

In the 1990s, her figure had breast cancer twice and had a mastectomy. This act prompted hundreds of viewers to write to the BBC to thank them for how sensitive they were with the subject. In 2016, when she last appeared on the series, her character killed himself because her cancer had returned.

Whatever happened to Ms. Windsor on-screen or off-screen, she never lost the joy of performing.

“I don’t think negatively,” she told the BBC in 1990 when asked how she would look back on her life. “I’m going to single out all of the wonderful things that happened and how happy I was paid – paid! – for something that I absolutely adored. “