Categories
Politics

Biden Indicators Government Order to Bolster Federal Authorities’s Cybersecurity

WASHINGTON – As the east coast suffered the effects of a ransomware attack on a major oil pipeline, President Biden signed an executive order on Wednesday that set tough new standards for the cybersecurity of software sold to the federal government.

The move is part of an overall effort to strengthen the defense of the United States by encouraging private companies to practice better cybersecurity or at risk of being banned from federal treaties. However, the bigger effect may come from what, over time, might look like a government safety rating for software products, similar to how cars get a safety rating or restaurants in New York get a health safety rating.

The contract comes amid a wave of new cyberattacks that are more sophisticated and far-reaching than ever before. Last year, around 2,400 ransomware attacks hit corporate, local and federal agencies in blackmail schemes that block or publish victims’ data unless they pay a ransom.

The most pressing fear is an attack on critical infrastructure, a point that Americans who panicked to buy gasoline became clear this week. A ransomware attack on Colonial Pipeline’s information systems forced the company to shut down a critical pipeline that has been supplying 45 percent of the east coast’s gasoline, diesel and jet fuel for several days.

While every president since George W. Bush has issued new guidelines to strengthen the country’s digital defenses, Biden’s command is designed to dig deep into the private sector. And it’s far more detailed than any previous effort.

For the first time, the US will require all software purchased by the federal government to meet a set of new cybersecurity standards within six months. Although companies would have to self-certify, violations would be removed from federal procurement lists, which could affect their chances of selling their products in the commercial market.

The contract also sets up an incident review board, much like the teams that investigate aircraft accidents to learn lessons from major hacking episodes. The White House dictates that the first incident investigated will be the SolarWinds hack, in which Russia’s leading intelligence agency changed the computer code of an American company’s network management software. It gave Russia broad access to 18,000 agencies, organizations, and companies, mostly in the United States.

The new regulation also stipulates that all federal agencies must encrypt data, regardless of whether it is stored or transmitted – two very different challenges. When China stole 21.5 million files via federal employees and contractors who had security clearance in place, none of the files were encrypted so they could be easily read. (Chinese hackers, investigators later concluded, encrypted the files themselves – so as not to be discovered when they sent the sensitive records back to Beijing.)

Previous efforts to set minimum standards for software failed at Congress, particularly at a major showdown nine years ago. Small businesses have said the changes are not affordable and larger businesses have resisted an intrusive role the federal government plays in their systems.

But Mr Biden decided it was more important to act quickly than try to fight for broader mandates on Capitol Hill. Its staff said it was a first step, and industry officials said it was bolder than expected.

Updated

May 12, 2021, 7:36 p.m. ET

Amit Yoran, the executive director of Tenable and a former cybersecurity officer in the Department of Homeland Security, said the question everyone was wondering was whether Mr. Biden’s orders would stop the next Colonial or SolarWinds attacks.

“No politics, government initiative or technology can do that,” said Yoran. “But that’s a good start.”

Government officials have complained that Colonial had poor defenses, and although it built a hard shell around its computer networks, it had no way of monitoring an adversary who got inside. The Biden administration hopes that the standards set out in the Executive Ordinance, which require multifactor authentication and other protective measures, will become widespread and improve security worldwide.

Senator Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia and chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, praised the order but said it should be followed by Congressional action.

Mr Warner said the recent attacks “have shown what has become increasingly apparent in recent years: that the United States is simply unwilling to fend off government sponsored or even criminal hackers who intend to compromise our systems for profit or espionage.” “

The new order is the first major public part of a multi-faceted review of defense, offensive, and legal strategies against opponents around the world. However, this arrangement focuses solely on deepening the defense in hopes of deterring attackers because they fear they will fail – or are at greater risk of being detected.

The Justice Department is setting up a new task force to take over ransomware. Now that it has been discovered in recent months that such attacks are more than just blackmail, they can topple economic sectors.

Mr Biden announced sanctions against Russia for the SolarWinds hack, and his national security adviser Jake Sullivan said there would be “invisible” consequences as well. So far, the United States has not taken similar action against the Chinese government because it was believed to have been involved in another attack and exploited loopholes in a Microsoft system used by large corporations around the world.

The Executive Order was first drafted in February in response to the SolarWinds intrusion. This attack was particularly nifty because hackers working for the Russian government managed to modify the company’s under development code that unsuspectingly distributed the malware in an update to its software packages. It was discovered during Mr Biden’s transition and led him to state that he could not trust the integrity of the federal computer systems.

Established under the Executive Ordinance, the review body is jointly chaired by the Minister of Homeland Security and a private sector official, based on the specific episode currently being investigated, in order to attract industry executives who fear the investigation could be fodder for lawsuits .

Since it was created by executive order rather than an act of Congress, the new body will not have the same extensive powers as a security body. However, officials remain confident that this will be helpful in identifying vulnerabilities, improving security practices, and pushing companies to invest more in improving their networks.

Much of the executive order focuses on information sharing and transparency. The aim is to reduce the time it takes for organizations that have been hacked or discover vulnerabilities to share this information with the Cyber ​​Security and Infrastructure Security Agency.

Categories
Politics

Federal Decide Strikes Down Moratorium on Evicting Renters

Homeowners have long argued that the moratorium was based on legally shaky ground, questioning the constitutionality of tying a major intervention in the national housing market to federal law aimed at stopping disease transmission.

The ruling “further demonstrates the illegality of this policy and reaffirms the extent to which the CDC has exceeded its authority,” said Robert Pinnegar, president of the National Apartment Association, a trade association representing large landlords that has also pushed for an end to the moratorium.

“The government must end enforcement of the CDC regulation and begin notifying stakeholders, including judges, now to prepare them to end,” he said.

The moratorium covers tens of millions of Americans at various income levels.

The Executive Order signed by Mr. Trump applies to every single renter earning less than $ 99,000 per year and families earning twice as much. According to the Census Bureau, around 8.2 million renters said they had slumped in their rents during the pandemic.

Enforcing the moratorium has always been an uncertain, even chaotic matter, left to the discretion of the judges of the State Housing Court.

These judges make decisions based on a variety of criteria, not just the federal moratorium, including local eviction orders and subjective factors such as a renter’s payment history and a landlord’s records of repairs.

Federal decisions, like the one passed on Wednesday, are significant but serve as a guide rather than an order – although a clear decision from a prominent federal court is likely to sway some local judges, said Eric Dunn, litigation director for the National Housing Law Project, a tenants’ agency .

Categories
Politics

Rudy Giuliani condominium searched by federal investigators in probe of Trump lawyer

Federal investigators carried out search warrants on Wednesday morning in the home and office of Rudy Giuliani in Manhattan, former New York City mayor who was former President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, NBC News reported.

The searches were part of a criminal investigation into Giuliani’s business in Ukraine, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing three people with knowledge of the matter.

FBI agents were taken to Giuliani’s apartment by his doorman, a source close to the former mayor told CNBC.

Outside of Rudy Giuliani’s home in New York, April 28, 2021.

And manganese | CNBC

They handed Giuliani an arrest warrant and requested “all electronic devices,” the source said.

Giuliani gave them a cell phone, iPad, and laptop, according to the source. The agents left after about 45 minutes, the source added. The arrest warrant for Giuliani’s office also authorized the seizure of electronic devices.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

A source told NBC that FBI agents had also executed a search warrant in the home of Republican attorney Victoria Toensing near Giuliani, near Washington.

Toensing, who is married to and works with former top Washington, DC prosecutor Joseph diGenova, represented Ukrainian oligarch Dmytro Firtash, who is himself the subject of indictment in the United States.

The source said no other arrest warrants other than those against Toensing and Giuliani were carried out on Wednesday.

The diGenova-Toensing law firm released a statement early Wednesday evening saying it was not a target in the investigation.

“Ms. Toensing is a former federal prosecutor and an official of the Ministry of Justice. She has always behaved and her legal practice according to the highest legal and ethical standards,” the statement said. “She would have liked to hand over all relevant documents. All they had to do was ask. Ms. Toensing was informed that she is NOT a target of the investigation.”

Giuliani is a retired United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, the same bureau that is investigating him.

The New York prosecutor’s office last year obtained approval from top Justice Department officials to request a search warrant for Giuliani’s electronic communications, NBC reported.

A source familiar with the investigation told NBC on Wednesday that prosecutors had sufficient grounds to obtain a search warrant late last year.

But the source said it was “just a matter of timing,” suggesting the Department of Justice – which oversees individual US law firms – may want to wait until the Trump administration ended in January.

A Giuliani attorney, Robert Costello, said authorities arrived at the Upper East Side apartment at 6 a.m. and confiscated electronic devices during the search, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The investigation is investigating possible violations of foreign lobbying rules, and the search warrant looked for communications between Giuliani and others, including conservative columnist John Solomon, Costello told The Journal.

Costello called the search “Legal Thuggery,” according to The Journal.

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, U.S. President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, speaks in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania on November 7, 2020.

Eduardo Munoz | Reuters

Giuliani tweeted Wednesday that he would be making a live statement on WABC-AM radio in New York at 3 p.m. ET. But he didn’t appear on that station as planned, and the show, hosted by Dominic Carter at the time, was discussing the Mayor’s race in New York City.

Giuliani also deleted his tweet.

In a detailed statement to NBC late Wednesday, Costello accused the Justice Department of “corrupt double standards” and compared his treatment of Giuliani to “high-ranking Democrats whose blatant crimes are ignored, such as Hilary Clinton, Hunter Biden and Joe Biden.”

Costello’s statement also alleged that the extracted materials were “loaded” with information that is protected under the rights of an attorney or client.

A Trump spokesman did not immediately respond to CNBC’s comments. The Justice Department and a spokesman for the SDNY declined to comment.

Giuliani attempted to gather harmful information about Hunter Biden in connection with the younger Biden’s business relationships in Ukraine in 2019.

Efforts by Giuliani, Trump, and others in his orbit to pressure Ukrainian officials to investigate the Bidens – or at least announce an investigation – prompted House Democrats to indict the former president for the first time. Democrats argued that Trump’s re-election ambitions sparked the dirt-seeking efforts.

The Senate, which was held by Republicans at the time, acquitted Trump.

Prosecutors in Manhattan were known to be reviewing Giuliani’s bank records in connection with an investigation into his activities in Ukraine.

Giuliani responded to the investigation last winter, claiming in an angry tweet that federal investigators were acting as “secret police” to aid Biden.

“You want to confiscate my e-mails. No reason. No wrongdoing. Attorney-client privilege.?” Giuliani tweeted on December 22nd.

The search was the second time SDNY investigators raided the property of someone who was serving as Trump’s attorney.

The first was Michael Cohen, whose office and home were raided three years ago this month.

Cohen, once a Trump loyalist, later turned on his former boss and pleaded guilty to several crimes related to the ex-president and the Trump organization. Trump and Giuliani both annoyed Cohen after his plea in November 2018.

Cohen is currently partnering with an ongoing criminal investigation into Trump and his business conducted by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office, Cyrus Vance Jr. This investigation focuses, among other things, on possible banking and insurance fraud related to Trump Organization real estate assets.

In a tweet on Wednesday, Cohen responded enthusiastically to news of the raid on Giuliani’s property.

“Here we go people !!!” Cohen tweeted.

Andrew Giuliani, the son of the former mayor and former Trump administration official, told CNN last week that he would be traveling to Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida to meet with the ex-president Discuss New York gubernatorial offer.

Andrew Giuliani speaks to the press outside the home of his father Rudy Giuliani, former President Donald Trump’s personal attorney and former Mayor of New York City, after the FBI issued a search warrant in Manhattan, New York City, United States, April 28, 2021 .

Tayfun Coskun | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

Meanwhile, in Manhattan, journalists and spectators were still gathered in front of Rudy Giuliani’s apartment building early Thursday evening when “It’s the Hard Knock Life” from the musical “Annie” was blown from a nearby car.

A passing man asked who the crowd was waiting for. “Steve Bannon,” one woman replied jokingly, referring to Trump’s former top advisor and campaign manager. Before stepping down, Trump pardoned Bannon, who had been on federal charges.

When he was told that the reporters and photographers were waiting for Giuliani, the man cracked: “Giuliani was attacked today? Over time.”

– CNBC’s Amanda Macias and Shepard Smith contributed to this report.

Categories
Business

Lobbyists urge updates to federal automobile security guidelines after Tesla crashes

Two major US auto industry lobby groups are pushing for updates to federal vehicle safety regulations following major accidents involving Tesla vehicles.

During a Senate subcommittee hearing Tuesday, executives from the Alliance for Automotive Innovation and the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association said the U.S. needed better standards and protocols to sell automated driving systems like Tesla’s under the Autopilot and Full Self-Driving brand names to address.

Tesla has been critical of the development, testing, and marketing of these systems, including the failure to prevent drivers from misusing or overestimating the capabilities of the autopilot and FSD.

There are questions about whether autopilot or FSD were in any way to blame for the recent Tesla accidents that the National Transportation Safety Board and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration are investigating. To date, the NHTSA has initiated around 28 investigations into Tesla vehicle accidents, of which around 24 are active. NTSB has launched 8 such investigations.

Automated driving systems, also known as driver assistance systems, can control some functions of a vehicle. However, automakers continue to require drivers to remain alert and drive even when the systems are in use.

In general, driver assistance is based on a mixture of cameras and sensors. Some automakers use advanced maps along with sensors to restrict the use of their systems to specific streets.

Despite their commercial availability, the United States does not regulate precise federal regulations or performance standards for automated driving systems.

“The US is at risk of losing our competitive advantage because of a lack of clear national guidelines,” said Ann Wilson, senior vice president of government affairs for the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association, during the hearing on Tuesday. She later added, “NHTSA can and should do more.”

John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said a “more strategic and robust approach” is needed for the government’s New Car Assessment program. He also said any modernization of the government’s Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), which set requirements for the design, construction, performance and durability of vehicles, should also be analyzed in relation to highly automated and autonomous vehicles.

“We need a national strategy, a framework that accommodates a new kind of regulation,” he said.

The comments came Tuesday afternoon during a Senate Land Transport, Shipping, Freight and Ports subcommittee on how automotive innovations will affect the future of vehicle safety, mobility and technology in a global economy.

It came a day after three Democratic U.S. Senators on Monday introduced laws mandating performance standards for driver monitoring systems and requiring those systems to be installed in new vehicles.

Tesla is not a member of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation or the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association. The company did not respond to a comment.

A steering wheel light bar and cluster icons indicate the status of Super Cruise ™ and prompt the driver to return their attention to the road if the system detects that the driver’s attention has been turned away from the road for too long.

Source: General Motors

Driver monitoring

Prior to the hearing, the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, which represents automotive suppliers and manufacturers who produce nearly 99% of new cars and light trucks sold in the US, published several safety principles related to driver monitoring in vehicles with driver assistance systems such as Tesla Autopilot.

Among other things, the guidelines call on car manufacturers to introduce camera-based driver monitoring systems for vehicles with automated driving or driver assistance systems. These are intended to recognize whether the drivers are attentive and ready to drive manually in situations in which the automated program is insufficient.

General Motors, Subaru, and BMW already have camera-based driver monitoring systems, and others like Ford Motor have announced similar plans. Tesla vehicles have cabin cameras, but according to the company’s operating instructions, they are not used for driver monitoring. With Tesla’s systems, the driver has to “check in” by touching the steering wheel.

“This issue that we are now debating – and I agree with you – is a consumer awareness and confidence issue. That is why we have set out these driver monitoring principles today,” Bozzella said during the hearing, without any company or specific company To mention system. “Driver monitoring is an important element in this.”

Tesla research

Last week consumer reports found that a 2020 Tesla Model Y “can easily get the car to drive even if no one is in the driver’s seat.”

The test included upgrading the Tesla steering wheel to bypass the vehicle’s safety features that otherwise might have disabled the autopilot. The test followed a fatal spring 2019 Model S crash in Texas in April that sparked two federal investigations by the National Transportation Safety Board and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

After a preliminary investigation, a Harris County police officer named Mark Herman told television that his investigators were “sure” that no one was in the driver’s seat of the Tesla at the time of the crash.

Extensive investigations have not been completed, and authorities have not disclosed whether the autopilot or Tesla’s premium automatic driving system FSD was in use before or at the time of the collision. Tesla advises in its owner’s manual that the autopilot and FSD require active monitoring.

The remains of a Tesla vehicle can be seen in this still from a video captured via social media after the crash in The Woodlands, Texas on April 17, 2021. Video recorded on April 17, 2021.

Scott J. Engle | via Reuters

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, said in a tweet earlier this month, “Data logs recovered so far show that autopilot was not activated and this car did not purchase an FSD. Also, the standard autopilot would require turning on lane lines that this road does not would have. “”

In a first quarter earnings call on Monday, Musk said journalists should be “ashamed” of their coverage of the crash. Tesla’s vice president of automotive technology, Lars Moravy, also shared additional details Tesla learned from helping with the local and state investigation to date.

Among other things, Moravy said that in the spring incident in Texas, “Autosteer couldn’t and couldn’t get into the road condition as it was designed.” He added that the car “only accelerated to 30 mph” before hitting a tree, and that a steering wheel deformity indicated to Tesla a “likelihood that someone was in the driver’s seat at the time of the accident”.

Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Motors, unveils a new all-wheel drive version of the Model S on October 9, 2014 in Hawthorne, California.

Lucy Nicholson | Reuters

During Tuesday’s government hearing, Senator Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn. Criticized Tesla and Musk for speaking about the crash while the federal investigation was ongoing.

“I was very disappointed that Tesla took to Twitter through its CEO to downplay the involvement of the company’s advanced driver assistance system before both the NTSB and NTHSA completed their ongoing investigations into the fatal accident,” he said.

The NTSB emailed CNBC, “Our investigation is ongoing and we are focused on the operation of the vehicle and the post-accident fire.”

The NHTSA and Spring, Texas police were not immediately available for comment.

Blumenthal said he agrees with some auto lobbyists that federal safety standards and new regulations are required.

He said, “Tesla’s crash shows that there are many unanswered questions about the technology that is supposed to be automated. Unfortunately, there are no current regulations that give the public much convenience that more automation is the answer without much improved consumer protection.”

Categories
Business

Biden to Elevate Minimal Wage for Federal Contractors to $15: Stay Updates

Here’s what you need to know:

Credit…Damon Winter/The New York Times

President Biden plans to sign an executive order on Tuesday raising the minimum wage paid by federal contractors to $15 an hour, the latest in a set of ambitious pro-labor moves at the outset of his administration.

The new minimum is expected to take effect next year and is likely to affect hundreds of thousands of workers, according to a White House document. The current minimum is $10.95 under an order that President Barack Obama signed in 2014. Like that order, the new one will require that the new minimum wage rise with inflation.

White House economists believed the increase would not lead to significant job losses, a finding in line with recent research on the minimum wage, and that it was unlikely to cost taxpayers more money, two administration officials said in a call with reporters. They argued that the higher wage would lead to greater productivity and lower turnover.

The White House also contends that although the number of workers directly affected by the increase is relatively small as a share of the economy, the executive order will indirectly raise wages beyond federal contractors by forcing other employers to bid up pay as they compete for workers.

Several cities have a minimum wage of at least $15 an hour, and several states have laws that will raise their minimum wage to at least that level in the coming years. There is so far little evidence on how a $15 minimum wage affects employment in lower-cost areas of such states.

Two years ago, the House of Representatives passed a bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour by 2025, but the legislation has faced long odds in the Senate. Mr. Biden sought to incorporate such a measure in his $1.9 trillion pandemic relief package so that it could pass on a simple majority vote, but the Senate parliamentarian ruled that it could not be included.

Mr. Biden’s executive order will also eliminate the so-called tipped minimum wage for federal contractors, which currently allows employers to pay tipped workers $7.65 an hour as long as their tips put them over the regular minimum wage. Under the new minimum, all workers must be paid at least $15 an hour.

The order will technically begin a rule-making process that is expected to conclude by early next year. The wage will be incorporated into new contracts and existing contracts as they are extended.

Traffic in Philadelphia last month. BP reported higher earnings on Tuesday, and said it expected demand for oil would continue to recover from the pandemic.Credit…Matt Rourke/Associated Press

BP reported a sharply higher profit for the first quarter of 2021 on Tuesday, signaling that after a grim 2020, oil companies’ earnings are recovering along with demand for their products.

BP said that underlying replacement cost profit, the metric most closely watched by analysts, was $2.6 billion, up from $791 million in the period year earlier. The London giant said that the price it received for its oil in the quarter was up more than 20 percent. BP described its trading and marketing of natural gas, where prices also increased, as “exceptionally strong.”

Citing strong economic growing in China and the United States, BP said that it expected the oil market to continue to recover from the effects of the pandemic.

Bernard Looney, the chief executive, has said he wants to use the cash from oil and gas operations to finance a shift toward electric power and other clean energy.

In the first quarter, the plan seemed to work well. The company raked in about $10.9 billion, a sum that included revenue from sales of fossil fuel businesses, among them a stake in a gas field in Oman. Because of divestments, BP’s oil production fell by 22 percent compared with the same period a year earlier.

At the same time, BP expanded into the offshore wind business. It entered into a partnership with Equinor, the Norwegian energy company that is developing wind farms off the East Coast of the United States, and is acquiring offshore wind acreage off Britain at what some in the industry considered high prices.

BP also said that, having met debt reduction targets, it would resume a program of buying back shares, a way to increase the price of BP stock; it had not bought back shares since the first quarter of last year, as its business was battered by the pandemic. In the second quarter the company plans to spend $500 million on such purchases.

Last summer, BP also cut its dividend for the first time since the Deepwater Horizon disaster a decade ago, to 5.25 cents a share. The dividend will remain at that level, the company said.

BP said it could generate a surplus with oil prices above $45 a barrel. Lately, prices have been considerably higher, with Brent crude, the international benchmark, at about $66 a barrel.

Nonprofit organizations “across the ideological spectrum” filed briefs supporting Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted. Credit…T.J. Kirkpatrick for The New York Times

A Supreme Court case argued on Monday has created strange bedfellows, which did not escape the attention of the justices.

The matter pits charities against the State of California over donor disclosure requirements, and it’s a dispute over a seemingly small technical issue that some say has serious implications for political donations. It has turned groups that are often on opposite sides of political fights into — tentative — allies, the DealBook newsletter reports.

Nonprofit organizations “across the ideological spectrum” filed briefs supporting the petitioners, the Koch-backed charity Americans for Prosperity Foundation, Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted. The foundation argues that California violates the constitutionally protected right to anonymous association by collecting major donor data and failing to protect it (the state’s website has experienced security breaches). Justice Kavanaugh cited a filing from the American Civil Liberties Union, the N.A.A.C.P. Legal Defense and Education Fund and others who all agreed that “a critical corollary of the freedom to associate is the right to maintain the confidentiality of one’s associations.”

“Certainly, we don’t see eye to eye with the petitioners in this case on every issue,” Brian Hauss of the A.C.L.U. said at a news conference after arguments at the court. In this case, the A.C.L.U. standing with the Americans for Prosperity Foundation because of what it calls California’s “systemic incompetence” in failing to protect nonpublic data. Legally speaking, however, it recognized a distinction between public disclosure and nonpublic disclosure. In other words, the brief didn’t argue for a general extension of anonymity.

Opponents say this is a case about “dark money.” Democratic senators argued in a brief that the foundation is advancing the matter as a way to make it easier for special interests to influence politics with untraceable money. “This case is really a stalking horse for campaign finance disclosure laws,” Justice Stephen Breyer said. A ruling is expected in June.

Shares in UPS were rising in premarket trading after the delivery company released first-quarter results that showed consolidated operating profit up 158 percent compared with a year ago.Credit…Patrick Semansky/Associated Press

  • U.S. stocks were little changed on Tuesday as investors digested more company earnings reports and awaited the Federal Reserve’s next policy decision on Wednesday. The S&P 500 drifted between gains and losses soon after the start of trading.

  • Tesla fell 2 percent even after the electric-car maker posted a quarterly profit of $438 million, its highest ever. UPS rose 11 percent after the parcel delivery company reported earnings that beat analysts’ expectations.

  • Alphabet, Microsoft and Visa are among companies also reporting earnings on Tuesday after the market closes.

  • By last Friday, a quarter of companies in the S&P 500 had published their first-quarter results, with 84 percent of them reporting earnings that were better than expected, according to FactSet. If this trend holds, it would be the highest percentage since FactSet started tracking the metric in 2008.

  • Most European stock indexes fell. The Stoxx Europe 600 declined nearly 0.3 percent.

  • HSBC rose 2 percent, becoming the best performer in the FTSE 100, after the bank said its pretax profits rose nearly 80 percent in the first quarter compared with last year. As the global economic outlook has improved, the bank released $435 million it had set aside for loan losses.

  • UBS dropped 3 percent after the Swiss bank said it lost $774 million in the first quarter from the collapse of the American hedge fund Archegos Capital Management.

Talasheia Dedmon enrolled her son Braylon in a college savings account through SEED for Oklahoma Kids, an effort to help a new generation climb the educational ladder and build assets. Credit…September Dawn Bottoms for The New York Times

An experiment called SEED for Oklahoma Kids, or SEED OK, is one of a growing number of efforts by cities and states — governed by Democrats and Republicans alike — to help a new generation climb the educational ladder and build assets

SEED OK is a far-reaching research project begun in Oklahoma 14 years ago to study whether creating savings accounts containing $1,000 for newborns would improve their graduation rates and their chances of going to college or trade school years later, Patricia Cohen reports for The New York Times.

Research about the Oklahoma project published this month by the Center for Social Development at Washington University in St. Louis, which created SEED OK, found that families that had been given accounts were more college-focused and contributed more of their own money than those that hadn’t been. And the effects are strongest among low-income families.

The 1,300-plus children who were chosen at random to be given accounts in 2007 had an average of $3,243 saved by the end of 2019. Among the control group — another 1,300 children who were randomly selected to take part but were not given any money — only 4 percent had an account.

Proposals at the federal level to establish savings accounts at birth, for college, homes, business or retirement savings, go back to the 1990s. Canada, Israel, South Korea and Singapore have established versions of the idea. Pennsylvania, Nebraska and Illinois are among the states that have created programs.

Technical problems marred the Small Business Association’s first attempt at accepting applications for the grant program.Credit…Zack Wittman for The New York Times

After months of delays and technical problems, the federal government finally opened a $16 billion grant fund for music club operators, theater owners and others in the live-event business on Monday.

Thousands of people hit the website for the Shuttered Venue Operators Grant program the moment it began accepting applications. Speed mattered: The money — awarded on a first-come-first-served basis — is widely expected to run out fast.

One applicant posted a screenshot showing that he was in line behind more than 6,000 others waiting for their turn to apply. “Hunger Games” memes — “May the odds be ever in your favor” — popped up in Twitter posts from desperate business owners venting their collective anxiety.

But this time, the system stayed up. As of 5 p.m. on Monday, the agency had received 6,040 grant applications, according to Andrea Roebker, an agency spokeswoman. Nearly 8,400 more had been created but not yet been completed.

Sarah Elger, chief executive of Pseudonym Productions, an events production company in Philadelphia, successfully submitted her application 16 minutes after she got access to the system.

“It was such a relief,” Ms. Elger said. She was one of thousands of business owners who had their hopes dashed earlier this month, when the Small Business Administration, the agency that runs the program, tried — and failed — to start taking applications. After four hours, the agency took the system offline for what turned into weeks of technology repair work.

Ms. Elger estimated that she uploaded more than 100 documents for her application, which she and her husband, Ricky Brigante, spent months preparing. They knew they would have to move quickly once the application website opened.

“We turned it into a game,” Ms. Elger said. “We had lots of folders on the desktop and raced through the uploads.”

The Small Business Administration said it would immediately start reviewing the applications, which are intended to yield grants for 45 percent of applicants’ prepandemic gross earned annual revenue, up to $10 million.

“We recognize the urgency,” said Barb Carson, the deputy associate administrator of the agency’s Office of Disaster Assistance. “With venue operators in danger of closing, every day that passes by is a day that these businesses cannot afford.”

The program, created in the $900 billion economic support package that President Donald J. Trump approved in December, is the first large direct-to-businesses grant program the Small Business Administration has ever run. The process, for both the agency and applicants, has for months been fraught with complexity and confusion.

John Russell, the executive director of the Montford Park Players, a nonprofit community theater group in Asheville, N.C., submitted his application on Monday afternoon. He is relying on the grant to help cover his group’s return to the stage.

After a full year of hosting only virtual events, the group is planning to open its first full in-person production, the Shakespeare play “The Comedy of Errors,” next month.

“We figured people are in the mood for comedy,” Mr. Russell said. The show’s actors are volunteers, but the production creates paid jobs for its director, stage manager, lighting designer, food vendors and others, as well as for the theater troupe’s support staff.

The Small Business Administration is also preparing to open a second grant program, the Restaurant Revitalization Fund, a $28.6 billion support fund for bars, restaurants and food trucks that was created in last month’s $1.9 trillion relief bill. That program is planning a seven-day test to help the agency avoid the kind of technical problems that plagued the venue program.

Lyft lost $1.8 billion last year as the pandemic cut into its revenue.Credit…Mike Blake/Reuters

Lyft will sell its unit devoted to developing autonomous vehicles to Woven Planet, a Toyota subsidiary, the companies announced on Monday. Woven Planet will pay $200 million in cash for Level 5, Lyft’s self-driving car initiative, and will follow up with additional payments of $350 million over five years.

Lyft is among several tech companies that have stepped back from developing autonomous vehicles over the last year as the technology has proved difficult to master and the pandemic has placed pressure on the company’s bottom lines. In December, Uber essentially paid Aurora, a self-driving truck start-up, to take its autonomous vehicle unit.

Some automotive executives have said they overestimated how soon the technology would be ready for the road. And although Waymo, the autonomous vehicle unit owned by Google’s parent company, Alphabet, has recently expanded its operations, the chief executive of Waymo stepped down earlier this month to pursue “new adventures.”

Lyft said unloading Level 5 would cut about $100 million in annual expenses, helping the company edge closer to profitability after the pandemic sliced into its revenue. Lyft lost $1.8 billion last year. The company is set to report earnings for the first three months of 2021 next month.

Lyft will still have a team focused on third-party self-driving technology and will continue to collect data from trips to help train autonomous systems, the company said.

“Not only will this transaction allow Lyft to focus on advancing our leading autonomous platform and transportation network, this partnership will help pull in our profitability timeline,” Lyft’s president, John Zimmer, said in a statement.

Categories
Politics

Federal Help to Renters Strikes Slowly, Leaving Many at Danger

WASHINGTON – Vier Monate, nachdem der Kongress zig Milliarden Dollar an Notmiethilfe bewilligt hatte, hat nur ein kleiner Teil Vermieter und Mieter erreicht, und an vielen Orten ist es unmöglich, überhaupt einen Antrag zu stellen.

Das Programm erfordert, dass Hunderte von staatlichen und lokalen Regierungen ihre eigenen Pläne ausarbeiten und umsetzen, und einige haben nur langsam begonnen. Das Tempo wird jedoch hauptsächlich durch die Komplexität der Aufgabe behindert: Das Starten eines riesigen Popup-Programms, das Millionen von Mietern erreicht, ihre Schulden überprüft und Vermieter gewinnt, deren Interessen nicht immer mit denen ihrer Mieter übereinstimmen.

Das Geld, um das es geht, ist riesig. Der Kongress genehmigte im Dezember 25 Milliarden US-Dollar und fügte im März mehr als 20 Milliarden US-Dollar hinzu. Die Summe, die die Bundesregierung jetzt für die Nothilfe in Höhe von 46,5 Milliarden US-Dollar zur Verfügung hat, entspricht dem Jahresbudget des Ministeriums für Wohnungsbau und Stadtentwicklung.

Experten sagen, dass eine sorgfältige Vorbereitung die Ergebnisse verbessern kann; Es braucht Zeit, um die bedürftigsten Mieter zu finden und die Zahlungsgenauigkeit sicherzustellen. Da jedoch jeder siebte Mieter angibt, dass er mit den Zahlungen im Rückstand ist, erleiden die Vermieter destabilisierende Verluste, je länger die Verteilung des Geldes dauert, und die Mieter riskieren die Räumung.

Millionen von Mietern sind nur durch ein dürftiges Bundesmoratorium vor Räumung geschützt, das mehreren gerichtlichen Herausforderungen gegenübersteht, viele Haushalte auslässt und voraussichtlich im Juni ausläuft.

“Ich bin beeindruckt von der Menge an Arbeit, die unbesungene Beamte leisten, um diese Programme einzurichten, aber es ist problematisch, dass nicht mehr Geld aus der Tür kommt”, sagte Ingrid Gould Ellen, Professorin an der New York University studiert die Anstrengung. “Es gibt nachgelagerte Effekte, wenn kleine Vermieter ihre Gebäude nicht aufrechterhalten können, und Sie möchten Familien erreichen, wenn sie zum ersten Mal in eine Krise geraten, damit sich ihre Probleme nicht verschärfen.”

Die Schätzungen der unbezahlten Mieten variieren stark zwischen 8 und 53 Milliarden US-Dollar, wobei die vom Kongress genehmigten Beträge am oberen Ende des Bereichs liegen.

Die Situation zeigt den Patchwork-Charakter des amerikanischen Sicherheitsnetzes. Lebensmittel, Bargeld, Gesundheitsversorgung und andere Arten von Hilfe fließen durch separate Programme. Jedes hat seine eigene Mischung aus Bundes-, Landes- und lokaler Kontrolle, was zu großen geografischen Unterschieden führt.

Während einige Pandemiehilfen durch etablierte Programme geflossen sind, ist die Miethilfe sowohl dezentral als auch neu, was die Abweichung besonders ausgeprägt macht.

Unter den Hilfesuchenden befindet sich Saundra Broughton, 48, eine Logistikarbeiterin außerhalb von Charleston, SC, die sich im Herbst als sichere Mittelklasse betrachtete, als sie eine Wohnung mit Fitnesscenter und Salzwasserpool mietete. Zu ihrem Schock wurde sie bald entlassen; Nachdem sich ihre Arbeitslosenunterstützung verzögert hatte, erhielt sie einen Räumungsbescheid.

“Ich habe immer gearbeitet und auf mich selbst aufgepasst”, sagte sie. “Ich war noch nie in öffentlicher Unterstützung.”

Ein Richter gab Frau Broughton 10 Tage Zeit, um ihre Wohnung zu verlassen. Nur ein Anruf in letzter Minute zur Prozesskostenhilfe brachte die Nachricht vom Bundesmoratorium, wonach sich die Mieter bewerben müssen. Sie eilte in die Bibliothek, um das Formular innerhalb von 24 Stunden auszudrucken. “Aber ich schulde immer noch das Geld”, sagte sie, ungefähr 4.600 Dollar und zählte.

Wenn Frau Broughton im nahe gelegenen Berkeley County gelebt hätte, hätte sie bereits am 29. März Hilfe suchen können. Im ein paar Meilen entfernten Charleston County hätte sie sich am 12. April bewerben können. Als Einwohnerin des Dorchester County muss sie sich jedoch durch bewerben Der Staat, der 272 Millionen US-Dollar an Bundesgeldern hat, aber noch keine Anträge entgegennimmt.

“Warum halten sie das Geld?” Sie sagte. „Ich habe Tausende von Dollar Schulden und könnte jederzeit rausgeschmissen werden. Es ist ein sehr beängstigendes Gefühl. “

Die enormen Hilfsmaßnahmen, die zu Beginn der Pandemie ergriffen wurden, enthielten keine spezifischen Bestimmungen zur Unterstützung der Mieter, obwohl sie den meisten Haushalten Bargeld gaben. Aber Hunderte von staatlichen und lokalen Regierungen haben Programme mit diskretionärem Geld aus dem CARES-Gesetz gestartet, das im März 2020 verabschiedet wurde. Diese Bemühungen zahlten 4,5 Milliarden US-Dollar aus, was einem Übungslauf für die derzeit laufenden Bemühungen mit dem Zehnfachen des Geldes entsprach.

Zu den genannten Lektionen gehört die Notwendigkeit, die ärmsten Mieter zu erreichen, um ihnen mitzuteilen, dass Hilfe verfügbar ist. Technologie war oft ein Hindernis: Mieter mussten sich online bewerben, und vielen fehlten Computer oder Internetzugang.

Die Forderung nach Unterlagen verhinderte auch die Hilfe, da viele Personen ohne Nachweis von Mietverträgen oder Einkommensverlusten die Anträge nicht abschließen konnten. Einige Vermieter lehnten eine Teilnahme ab und zogen es möglicherweise vor, neue Mieter zu suchen.

Trotz des steigenden Bedarfs gaben Programme in Florida und New York, die durch den CARES Act finanziert wurden, zig Millionen nicht ausgegebener Dollar an die Staaten zurück. Als der Kongress im Dezember das neue Programm verabschiedete, gab fast jeder fünfte Mieterhaushalt an, mit den Zahlungen im Rückstand zu sein.

Die nationalen Bemühungen, das Emergency Rental Assistance Program, werden von der Finanzabteilung durchgeführt. Es verteilt Geld an Staaten sowie an Städte und Landkreise mit mindestens 200.000 Einwohnern, die ihre eigenen Programme durchführen möchten. Etwa 110 Städte und 227 Landkreise haben sich dafür entschieden.

Das Programm bietet Mietern mit niedrigem Einkommen, die durch die Pandemie wirtschaftlich geschädigt wurden, bis zu 12 Monate Miete und Nebenkosten, wobei Haushalte mit weniger als der Hälfte des Durchschnittseinkommens der Region Vorrang haben – in der Regel etwa 34.000 USD pro Jahr. Das Bundesgesetz verweigert die Hilfe für Einwanderer ohne Papiere nicht, obwohl dies in einigen Bundesstaaten und Landkreisen der Fall ist.

Moderne Hilfe scheint eine Mischung aus Jacob Riis und Bill Gates zu erfordern – Kontakt zu den Ausgegrenzten und Hilfe bei der Software. Die Fortschritte verlangsamten sich einen Monat lang, als die Biden-Regierung die unter Präsident Donald J. Trump herausgegebenen Leitlinien annullierte und Regeln entwickelte, die weniger Dokumentation erfordern.

Andere Gründe für langsame Starts variieren. Progressive Gesetzgeber in New York diskutierten monatelang darüber, wie die bedürftigsten Mieter am besten geschützt werden können. Die konservativen Gesetzgeber in South Carolina konzentrierten sich weniger auf das Thema. Das Ergebnis war jedoch weitgehend dasselbe: Keiner der Gesetzgeber hat sein Programm bis April verabschiedet, und keiner der Staaten nimmt noch Anträge an.

“Ich weiß nur nicht, warum es nicht dringender war”, sagte Sue Berkowitz, die Direktorin des South Carolina Appleseed Legal Justice Center. “Wir haben ununterbrochen von Leuten gehört, die sich Sorgen um die Räumung machen.”

Es gibt keine vollständigen Daten darüber, wie vielen Mietern geholfen wurde. Aber von den 17,6 Milliarden US-Dollar, die an die Regierungen der Bundesstaaten vergeben werden, gehen 20 Prozent an Bundesstaaten, die noch keine Anträge stellen, obwohl einige lokale Programme in diesen Bundesstaaten dies tun. Florida (mit 871 Millionen US-Dollar), Illinois (566 Millionen US-Dollar) und North Carolina (547 Millionen US-Dollar) gehören zu denen, die noch nicht begonnen haben.

“Das Tempo ist langsam”, sagte Greg Brown von der National Apartment Association, der betonte, dass die Vermieter Hypotheken, Steuern und Unterhalt zu zahlen haben.

In einem kürzlich in der Brookings Institution gehaltenen Vortrag lobte Erika Poethig, eine Immobilienexpertin im Innenpolitischen Rat des Weißen Hauses, die „beispiellose Menge an Mietunterstützung“ und sagte, „die Bundesregierung hat nur so viel Fähigkeit“, schnellere Maßnahmen zu fördern.

Das Akzeptieren von Bewerbungen ist nur der Anfang. Mit 1,5 Milliarden US-Dollar hat Kalifornien 150.000 Anfragen nach Hilfe angezogen. Von den beantragten 355 Millionen US-Dollar wurden jedoch nur 20 Millionen US-Dollar genehmigt und 1 Million US-Dollar ausgezahlt.

Texas, mit 1,3 Milliarden US-Dollar, begann schnell, aber das Unternehmen, das es mit der Ausführung des Programms beauftragte, hatte Softwarefehler und Personalmangel. Ein Ausschuss im Repräsentantenhaus stellte fest, dass das Programm nach 45 Tagen nur 250 Haushalte bezahlt hatte.

Im Gegensatz dazu hatte ein Programm, das von der Stadt Houston und Harris County gemeinsam durchgeführt wurde, etwa ein Viertel seines Geldes ausgegeben und fast 10.000 Haushalte unterstützt.

Nicht jeder ist von dem Tempo betroffen. “Das Geld schnell rauszuholen ist hier nicht unbedingt das Ziel, insbesondere wenn wir uns darauf konzentrieren, sicherzustellen, dass das Geld die am stärksten gefährdeten Menschen erreicht”, sagte Diane Yentel, die Direktorin der National Low Income Housing Coalition.

Angesichts der Herausforderung sagte sie: “Ich denke, es geht in Ordnung.”

Sie weist auf ein Programm in Santa Clara County, Kalifornien, hin, das letztes Jahr für seine Reichweite gelobt wurde. Viele der Leute, denen es diente, sprachen wenig Englisch oder es fehlten formelle Mietverträge, um sie einzureichen. Jetzt, da 36 Millionen US-Dollar im Rahmen des neuen Programms ausgegeben werden sollten, entschied man sich für wochenlange zusätzliche Planungen, um 50 gemeinnützige Gruppen auszubilden, um die ärmsten Haushalte zu finden

“Geld zu verschenken ist eigentlich ziemlich schwierig”, sagte Jen Loving, die Destination: Home leitet, eine Wohnungsgruppe, die die Kampagne leitet. “Das ganze Geld der Welt spielt keine Rolle, wenn es nicht an die Menschen geht, die es brauchen.”

In Charleston, SC, wurde der Wohnungsbau zu einem Problem, nachdem eine Studie aus dem Jahr 2018 ergab, dass das Gebiet die höchste Räumungsrate des Landes aufweist. Charleston County führte drei Runden Mietentlastung mit CARES Act-Geldern durch, und der Staat führte zwei Runden durch.

Das zweite staatliche Programm, das im Februar mit 25 Millionen US-Dollar begann, zog so viele Anträge an, dass es innerhalb von sechs Tagen abgeschlossen wurde. Aber South Carolina bearbeitet diese Anfragen immer noch, während es entscheidet, wie die neuen Bundesmittel verteilt werden sollen.

Antonette Worke gehört zu den Bewerbern, die auf eine Antwort warten. Sie zog letztes Jahr von Denver nach Charleston, angezogen von günstigeren Mieten, wärmerem Wetter und einem Jobangebot. Aber der Job scheiterte und ihr Vermieter beantragte die Räumung.

Frau Worke, die an Nieren- und Lebererkrankungen leidet, ist vorübergehend durch das föderale Räumungsmoratorium geschützt. Es gilt jedoch nicht für Mieter, deren Mietverträge ablaufen, wie dies Ende nächsten Monats der Fall sein wird. Ihr Vermieter sagte, er würde sie zum Umzug zwingen, selbst wenn der Staat die überfälligen 5.000 Dollar Miete zahlen würde.

Trotzdem sagte sie, die Hilfe sei wichtig: Eine saubere Tafel würde es einfacher machen, eine neue Wohnung zu mieten und sie von einer unmöglichen Schuld zu befreien. “Ich bin so gestresst, dass ich mich krank gemacht habe”, sagte sie.

Charleston County bewegte sich schneller als der Staat und startete vor zwei Wochen sein 12-Millionen-Dollar-Programm. Die Arbeiter haben Computer zu Bauernmarkierungen, Gemeindezentren und einem Parkplatz in einem Einkaufszentrum gebracht. Christine DuRant, eine stellvertretende Bezirksverwalterin, sagte, die Hilfe sei notwendig, um Zwangsvollstreckungen zu verhindern, die den Wohnungsbestand verringern könnten. Kritiker würden sich jedoch stürzen, wenn das Programm Zahlungen an Personen senden würde, die sich nicht qualifizieren. Sie sagte: „Wir werden geprüft“, möglicherweise dreimal.

Latoya Green ist dort gefangen, wo der Wunsch nach Geschwindigkeit und Buchhaltung aufeinander treffen. Als Angestellte, die durch die Pandemie Stunden verloren hat, schuldet sie 3.700 US-Dollar an Miete und Nebenkosten und ist nur bis zum Ablauf ihres Mietvertrags im nächsten Monat durch das Räumungsmoratorium geschützt.

Sie beantragte an dem Tag, an dem das County-Programm begann, Hilfe, hat den Antrag jedoch noch nicht ausgefüllt. Sie sagte, sie sei verunsichert über die E-Mails, in denen sie um ihren Mietvertrag gebeten werde, der ihr fehlt, und über den Nachweis von Einkommensverlusten.

Dennoch kritisiert Frau Green keine Beamten des Charleston County. “Ich denke, sie versuchen ihr Bestes”, sagte sie. “Viele Leute machen Betrug.”

Mit der Zeit fügte sie hinzu: „Ich hoffe nur und bete zu Gott, dass sie mir helfen können.“

Categories
Politics

Federal Inspectors Worry Extra Vaccines Have been Uncovered to Contamination

WASHINGTON – Federal regulators have identified serious defects at the Baltimore plant that resulted in up to 15 million potentially contaminated doses of Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine being spilled. This casts doubt on the continued production of a vaccine in the US that the government once considered essential in the fight against the pandemic.

Food and Drug Administration regulators said the company that makes the Emergent BioSolutions vaccine may have contaminated additional doses at the facility. They said the company had not fully investigated the contamination while raising concerns about the disinfection practices, the size and design of the facility, the handling of raw materials and the training of workers.

“There is no guarantee that other lots have not been exposed to cross-contamination,” said the FDA’s 12-page report.

The report was a harsh reprimand for Emergent, who had long downplayed setbacks at the factory, and added to the problems for Johnson & Johnson, whose vaccine was viewed as a game changer because it only takes one shot and is mass-produced can volume and is easy to store.

In the US, production is now ceasing and all vaccines made at the factory have been quarantined. Johnson & Johnson fell far short of its promises to deliver tens of millions of doses to the federal government, partly because concerns about an extremely rare but dangerous blood clotting disorder led federal officials to temporarily suspend distribution last week.

The FDA’s findings, based on an inspection that ended Tuesday, underscore questions raised in New York Times reports about why Emergent didn’t fix issues sooner and why federal officials overseeing their lucrative contracts weren’t demanding better performance .

A series of confidential audits The Times conducted last year warned of the risk of viral and bacterial contamination and a lack of adequate sanitation at the Baltimore plant. Separately, The Times reported, a leading federal manufacturing expert warned last June that Emergent must be “closely monitored.”

Some health officials were surprised by the FDA’s conclusions.

“I’m shocked – I can’t put it any other way,” said Dr. José R. Romero, chairman of a panel that advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and will recommend the use of Johnson & Johnson vaccine later this week. “Inappropriate disinfection, prevention of contamination – these are significant and serious violations.”

In statements on Wednesday, the FDA, Emergent and Johnson & Johnson said they were working to resolve the issues at the factory. There was no indication of how long that would take.

Emergent said, “While we are never satisfied with defects in our manufacturing equipment or processes, they can be corrected and we will take quick action to correct them.”

The FDA has not yet certified the facility in the Bayview neighborhood of Baltimore, and no doses administered there have been released to the public. All Johnson & Johnson recordings made in the United States are from overseas.

In a statement, Dr. Janet Woodcock, Acting Commissioner of the FDA, and Dr. Peter Marks, the top vaccine regulator: “We will only allow the release of products when we are sure that they meet our quality expectations.”

Emergent is a longtime government contractor who has spent much of his time over the past two decades building a market for federal biological defense spending.

Although the Emergent government placed a $ 163 million contract in 2012 to prepare the Baltimore plant for mass production in a pandemic, the site remained largely untested and the company failed to meet the requirement to demonstrate its rapid-reaction capabilities, according to former health officials and contract documents.

Even so, the Emergent government placed a $ 628 million order in June last year, largely to reserve manufacturing space at the plant, and prompted the company to manufacture the Johnson & Johnson shot and a separate vaccine developed by AstraZeneca.

Now Emergent’s dealings with the government are being scrutinized more and more closely. On Tuesday, the House Select Coronavirus Crisis Subcommittee and House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform announced an investigation into the company’s Covid-19 vaccine deal, as well as its long-standing control over an oversized portion of the country’s emergency medicine budget to Reserve, the Strategic National Stockpile.

A Times investigation found that the company’s purchase of the company’s anthrax vaccine over the past decade accounted for nearly half of the reserve’s total annual budget, leaving less cash to spend on critical supplies like masks, which were in short supply last year.

The Bayview facility was supposed to produce most of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which received federal emergency approval this year, but only for doses made in the Netherlands. AstraZeneca’s vaccine is not yet approved in the US, regardless of where it is made.

The FDA inspection began after routine checks revealed that Emergent employees had contaminated at least part of a batch of 13-15 million doses of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine with the harmless virus used to make the AstraZeneca shot. Regulators determined that Emergent did not investigate this incident thoroughly and only performed a routine cleanup afterwards. A previous review by Bayview for a pharmaceutical customer found that Emergent glossed over deviations from manufacturing standards without conducting thorough reviews.

The inspectors who examined security recordings as part of their review found that Emergent was not considering whether one or more employees might have been the source of the contamination. Workers are expected to change clothes, ankle boots and showers before moving between the various manufacturing zones for Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca.

But regulators said the rule appeared to be routinely violated. In a period of 10 days in February, for example, 13 employees moved from one zone to another on the same day, but only one documented having showered. The inspectors also said Emergent failed to consider whether using common storage containers for raw materials might have caused the contamination. Emergent’s internal audit last July found that the flow of workers and materials through the plant was not adequately controlled “to avoid mix-ups or contamination.”

Federal officials have already insisted on a major change that they believe should significantly limit the risks. This month they instructed Emergent to stop the AstraZeneca shot at the factory and are now trying to help AstraZeneca find a new manufacturing facility.

In another result, the FDA regulators wrote that the Bayview building “is not being kept in a clean and hygienic condition”. Nor is it “of the appropriate size, design and location to facilitate cleaning, maintenance and proper operation,” they said.

They cited peeling paint, damaged walls, improperly trained staff, overcrowded equipment and poor waste disposal. A problem that, in their opinion, could lead to contamination of the warehouse in which raw materials are stored.

The results were released two days prior to the CDC’s scheduled vote to extend, lift, or change the suspension of Johnson & Johnson. Officials recommended the break to investigate eight cases of a rare coagulation disorder in vaccine recipients, one of which was fatal.

Johnson & Johnson resumed its rollout in Europe this week after regulators investigated similar concerns. They recommended putting a warning about the blood clots on the vaccine label, but said the benefits outweighed the risks.

The inspection report comes as a group of shareholders sued Emergent, alleging executives misled investors about the company’s ability to manufacture Covid-19 vaccines in Baltimore.

Emergent’s share price soared following announcements of $ 1.5 billion in deals with the federal government, Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca last year. Throughout 2020, its founder and chairman Fuad El-Hibri deposited over $ 42 million in shares and options, and the company’s executive director Robert Kramer recently received a cash bonus of $ 1.2 million.

The lawsuit alleges that the stock price was artificially increased because executives failed to disclose significant quality control issues at the facility. Emergent stocks have been falling in the past few weeks.

Shortly after the Trump administration’s Operation Warp Speed ​​decided to award the $ 628 million contract to Emergent, Carlo de Notaristefani, a manufacturing expert who has been overseeing vaccine production for the federal government since last May, warned the company about his To have to “strengthen” quality controls. requires “significant resources and dedication”.

Dr. Robert Kadlec, the former Trump administration official overseeing the procurement process, said in an interview Tuesday that officials “recognized that there would be inherent risks,” but the government intends “to try to manage those risks consistently.” to reduce. ” . ”

Dr. Romero, the head of the CDC advisory board who is also the Arkansas Secretary of Health, was concerned that the plant’s problems could keep people from getting vaccinated, even though doses from there have not reached the public. Andy Slavitt, a senior health advisor to President Biden, told reporters that the audit “demonstrated a process that is working as it should”.

Johnson & Johnson said it had already increased oversight of Emergent and would “ensure that all FDA observations are promptly and comprehensively addressed”.

The pharmaceutical company is expected to nearly double its supervisors at the Bayview facility to perhaps a dozen, although Emergent will continue to employ around 600 people.

Categories
Politics

Senators Debating Federal Voting Legal guidelines Scrutinize Georgia Statue

Senate Democrats again on Tuesday pushed for a national extension of voting rights, calling together leaders from the battlefield state of Georgia to work out a public case in which Congress should intervene to break down state electoral barriers.

At a heated hearing on Capitol Hill, Senators polled elected officials, academics, and supporters of the state’s new electoral law, and dozens of others, as it has been introduced in Republican state houses since the 2020 elections to restrict access to ballot papers. Her main witness was Stacey Abrams, the Georgia suffrage activist who arguably did more than any other Democrat to formulate her party’s views on electoral issues.

For over four hours, Ms. Abrams argued that Republican-led states like hers were seeing “a resurgence in anti-color-voting policies” against color voters across the country. She accused Republicans of using “racial animation” to tip the electorate in their favor after former President Donald J. Trump lost Georgia and unfoundedly claimed he was a victim of electoral fraud.

She warned that decades of profits could be reversed if Congress didn’t intervene.

“When basic suffrage is left to the political ambitions and prejudices of state actors who rely on repression to maintain power, federal advocacy is the appropriate tool,” Abrams said.

While the Justice Committee hearing wasn’t specifically legislative, it was part of a push by the Democrats to use their leverage in Washington to propose a few key voting bills that could counter hundreds of restrictive proposals in the states.

The first is a gigantic overhaul of the national elections, known as HR 1, which would, among other things, force states to expand early voting and postal voting, mandate automatic voter registration, and neutral restrictive voter identification laws.

The second bill, named after civil rights icon John Lewis, would restore a key enforcement provision in the Voting Rights Act of 1965 that made it difficult for states to oppose color voters. It was put down by the Supreme Court in 2013.

Republicans oppose both bills but have directed their anger most directly at the election overhaul, which includes a new funding system for public campaigns and a revision of the federal election commission. Calling it a gross overreach of the federal government on Tuesday to help the Democrats consolidate power, they rejected allegations of racism and renewed their vows to defeat them in the evenly divided Senate.

“HR 1 is not about correcting mistakes,” said Senator Lindsey Graham, Republican from South Carolina. “It’s about power.”

In a sign of how polarized the debate over the vote has become, the two parties have even argued over the title of the hearing itself. Senator Richard J. Durbin, Democrat of Illinois and chairman of the panel, had called it “Jim Crow 2021: The Recent Assault on the Suffrage”. The Republicans called this historically inaccurate and accused the Democrats – including President Biden – of cheapening the stain of violent racial repression by comparing it to current electoral laws.

“It is disgusting and insulting to compare the actual suppression and violence of voters of the day we grew up with a state law that only requires people to show their ID,” said Republican Burgess Owens, Republican of Utah , adding that he “actually” had witnessed Jim Crow Laws “as a child in the south.

Mr Durbin acknowledged that Jim Crow “was more violent at its worst than the situation we face today”. But he insisted that the goal was similar.

“The bottom line of this hearing is whether there is a bill or intention in legislation in many states, including Georgia, to limit or restrict minority suffrage,” said Mr. Durbin. ” I think that goes without saying. “

The unified Republican opposition poses certain problems for a major federal electoral law. The Democrats would have to convince all 50 of their senators to vote for the bill and create a drafting of Senate rules to pass it by a simple majority, relying on the casting vote of Vice President Kamala Harris. But for now, Senator Joe Manchin III, Democrat of West Virginia, has opposed this approach and called for bipartisan negotiations.

The attempts by the Democrats to renew the voting rights law appear to be just as steep. Republicans no longer consider it necessary to re-establish the affected provision, which required federal approval of changes in voting procedures in parts of the country with a history of discrimination.

Without them, proxies say they have seen an increase in restrictive state electoral laws like Georgian and will have to spend years in court trying to overturn laws that violate the Constitution.

“Litigation is a blunt tool,” said Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund. “What the pre-clearance gave us was to be one step ahead of voter discrimination before it happened.”

Republicans have repeatedly turned to their own witnesses to back up proposals from Democrats, including Bill Gardner, New Hampshire’s long-time electoral officer and Democrat. Mr Gardner argued that trying to overhaul his party would backfire.

“Why should we be made to be like California in particular or in other states?” Mr. Gardner said. “We have a method that works for the people of New Hampshire. The turnout is proof that it works, and this type of federal legislation is detrimental to the way we vote. “

Georgia House Republican spokesman Jan Jones vigorously defended her state’s new electoral law, saying Republicans were merely “making voting easier and cheating harder.”

She said a provision banning third groups from providing food and water to voters waiting in line to cast their ballots is not a draconian tactic to stifle voter turnout, but an attempt to target activists and candidates to prevent food and other goodies from being used to influence voters.

An analysis by the New York Times identified 16 provisions in Georgian law that either impair people’s voting power or shift power to the Republican-controlled legislature.

Republican senators also seemed eager to question Ms. Abrams, a Democratic star who might run for governor of Georgia again next year, directly. Mr. Graham and Senator John Cornyn of Texas showered them with questions designed to make their claims about voter identification laws contradictory and their condemnation of the Georgian Statute hypocritical.

“So the voter card is sometimes racist, sometimes not racist?” Asked Mr. Cornyn in a long exchange.

“Intent is always important, sir, and that is the point of this conversation,” replied Ms. Abrams, saying that she supports some voter identification laws. “That’s the point of the Jim Crow narrative. That Jim Crow looked at not just the activities but the intent as well. “

Polls show that the public generally supports such laws, but proponents of voting rights argue that they can make it difficult for some people of color to vote.

Mr. Cornyn kept rephrasing the question. Mrs. Abrams pushed back.

“Senator, I am happy to answer your questions, but if you characterize my answers incorrectly, it is inappropriate,” she said.

Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton blamed Ms. Abrams for Major League Baseball’s decision to move this summer’s All-Star Game from Georgia, and said her public criticism of the electoral law was “central to” one Decision played that this could cost their state economically.

Ms. Abrams disagreed strongly, saying she spoke out against the league move but would stand by anyone who defends the right to vote.

“For me a game day is not worth losing our democracy,” she said.

Categories
Business

Congressional investigation launched into Emergent BioSolutions’ federal vaccine contracts

Top House Democrats have launched an investigation into whether Emergent Biosolutions, which recently botched 15 million doses of Covid-19 vaccine, won the federal contract for inclusion because of its cozy relationship with a former top Trump government official.

New York Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, Chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, and James E. Clyburn of South Carolina, Chair of the Select Subcommittee on Coronavirus Crisis, sent a joint letter to Emergent Solutions CEO Robert G. Kramer and board chairman Fuad El-Hibri demand that they testify before the coronavirus subcommittee.

“In particular, we are investigating reports that Emergent has won multi-million dollar contracts to manufacture coronavirus vaccines, despite a long, documented history of inadequately trained personnel and quality control issues,” the legislature wrote.

The committees deal specifically with the role that Dr. Robert Kadlec, former Emergent Advisor and Trump’s Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response, has played in helping the company get the job done. They asked the company to hand over a number of documents, including all federal contracts since 2015, all communications with Kadlec, as well as information on audits and inspections of its facilities, drug pricing and executive compensation.

“Emergent received $ 628 million in June 2020 to set up the primary US vaccine manufacturing facility developed by Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca,” lawmakers wrote in a letter sent to Kramer and El-Hibri on Monday . Kadlec “appears to have pushed for this award, although there are indications that Emergent was unable to reliably perform the contract.”

According to the letter, an FDA inspection of the Baltimore plant in April 2020 revealed that Emergent did not have the personnel to manufacture a coronavirus vaccine. Another inspection in June revealed that Emergent’s plan to manufacture much-needed coronavirus vaccines was inadequate due to poorly trained staff and quality control issues.

Despite falling short on federal inspections, the Trump administration paid the company $ 628 million in June to manufacture coronavirus vaccines.

Reports later surfaced indicating quality control issues at Emergent’s Baltimore facility.

“During the manufacturing process, your company contaminated millions of doses of Johnson & Johnson’s one-shot coronavirus vaccine with ingredients from the AstraZeneca vaccine,” the legislature wrote.

Emergent was forced to destroy up to 15 million tainted doses of the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, and an additional 62 million doses remained pending until it was found not to have been mistaken by the York Times.

Emergent’s Baltimore facility has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, so none of the cans produced at the site were ever distributed or made it into the arms of the Americans.

“We are concerned about the cost to taxpayers and the potential impact on our country’s vaccination efforts from failed attempts by Emergent to manufacture these vaccines,” the legislature wrote.

Lawmakers also said they are considering Emergent’s role as the sole anthrax vaccine supplier on the Strategic National Stockpile.

“Emergent has increased the government purchase price for the anthrax vaccine by 800% since the drug was purchased in 1998. As a result, nearly half of the SNS budget has been spent on purchasing Emergent’s anthrax vaccine over the past decade,” so the representative wrote.

According to the letter, after Kadlec was confirmed in the Trump administration, Emergent received millions of dollars in federal contracts from his agency, including inventory contracts, “which were put out to tender”.

Emergent encouraged oversight of the inventory to be transferred from the Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention to the Deputy Secretary’s Office for Preparedness and Response under Kadlec’s control according to the letter.

Until 2015, Kadlec Emergent advised through his company RPK Consulting. Kadlec was confirmed as the head of the Office of the Ministry of Health and Human Services in 2017.

Kramer and El-Hibri were asked to testify before the subcommittee on May 19 at 10:30 am ET.

Categories
Business

Peloton Pushes Again In opposition to Federal Company Over Treadmill Warning

Exercise bike company Peloton struggled Saturday after a federal agency warned those with children at home should stop using the company’s Tread + treadmills.

The agency, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission, issued an “urgent warning” after reports of 38 injuries and one death related to the machine previously known as the Tread.

The agency said those with young children at home should stop using the machine and warned that the Tread + posed a risk to children, including abrasions, breaks, and even death.

The commission said at least one accident reportedly happened while one parent was using the treadmill. Those who continue to use it should do so in a locked room that is inaccessible to children and pets, the agency said.

The commission also shared a video on Saturday of a child stuck under the machine. After a few seconds the child was able to break free and walk away.

The commission did not provide the age of the deceased or injured child.

Joe Martyak, a commission spokesman, said it continues to investigate the dangers associated with the Tread + machine.

“Given the pattern of hazards that have been reported to affect children in private households with this product, public health and safety warrants such a warning,” Martyak said.

Peloton pushed back on Saturday, saying the commission’s warning was “inaccurate and misleading”. The company said in the statement that there was no reason for consumers not to use the machine, adding that safety warnings should always be followed.

Peloton admitted that “a child died while using the Tread + machine,” adding that they were “shocked and devastated” to learn of the death. The company also reported that another child suffered a brain injury in an accident. The child should make a full recovery, Peloton said.

In business today

Updated

April 16, 2021, 1:30 p.m. ET

“While Peloton knows the Tread + is safe for the home in accordance with warnings and cautions, the company is committed to taking all necessary and reasonable steps to further educate members about potential risks,” the company said.

“The importance of following Peloton’s safety warnings and instructions is very evident in the video,” Peloton said, referring to the video shared by the commission. The company added that Peloton is instructing its customers to remove the machine’s security key when not in use to prevent such incidents.

The machine costs more than $ 4,200, according to the company’s website.

Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Connecticut Democrat, urged Peloton to work with the agency.

“It is clear that the Peloton Tread + needs to be recalled,” said Blumenthal. “The company’s attempts to disapprove consumer abuse reports are irresponsible and inexcusable as there have been several incidents involving adults using the treadmill as directed by the company.”

Peloton said it had asked the commission to make a joint announcement about the risks of failing to follow safety instructions and asked John Foley, the company’s executive director, to meet with the agency.

“Peloton is disappointed that, despite its offers to collaborate and despite the fact that the Tread + meets all applicable safety standards, CPSC was unwilling to have significant discussions with Peloton before issuing its inaccurate and misleading press release,” the company said .

In a letter published in March, Mr. Foley addressed the child’s death.

“While we have known only a small handful of Tread + -related incidents that have injured children, everyone in Peloton is devastating and our hearts go out to the families affected,” said Foley.