Categories
World News

As China forges international commerce ties, U.S. dangers falling behind

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang attends the signing ceremony of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement following the fourth RCEP summit held on November 15, 2020 via video link. Chinese Trade Minister Zhong Shan signed the agreement on behalf of China.

Xinhua News Agency | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

The biggest hole in the Biden government’s otherwise encouraging efforts to better compete with China – a loophole that could undermine all other parts – is the lack of an international trade strategy.

As President Xi Jinping’s China accelerates its efforts to negotiate multilateral and bilateral trade and investment agreements around the world, both Republicans and Democrats in the US have become allergic to such agreements.

“The Chinese firmly believe in the importance of the correlation of forces, and they believe the correlation is in their favor right now,” said Stephen Hadley, former national security adviser to President George W. Bush. If the US does not change this Chinese belief, it will not regain the leverage needed to deal with Beijing.

“The most important missing element in changing this Chinese rationale is a trade strategy,” says Hadley, which could gather global allies, create American jobs and growth, and counter the escalating Chinese efforts to organize the world economy around them.

Former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright once called the US the “indispensable country” of the world, but Xi now positions China as the “indispensable economy” of the world.

By 2018, 90 countries in the world were trading twice as much with China as they did with the United States. By 2019, China surpassed the US as the world’s largest recipient of FDI. The underlying message now is that China’s market is so large, its liquidity so deep and its recovery from Covid-19 so dramatic (up 18% in the first quarter) that no sane country can resist its acceptance.

“In times of economic globalization, openness and inclusion are an unstoppable historical trend,” President Xi told the Boao Asia Forum this week. Without mentioning Washington by name, he said that “attempts to” build walls “or” decouple “are contrary to economic law and market principles. They would harm the interests of others without being of any use to yourself.”

It is far too easy to poke holes in Xi’s statement: China is still rich in market protection measures and government interventions at home and abroad are on the rise. Intellectual property theft and cybercrime continue.

But without a modern, future-oriented trade strategy, the US is entering this global crisis with one arm behind its back.

“The US and China are in a strategic competition that will determine the shape of world politics this century,” former US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson Jr. wrote in the Wall Street Journal. “But when it comes to trade, a critical dimension of this competition, America is stepping down.”

This undermines the early successes of the emerging Biden approach to China.

First, Biden has benefited from a bipartisan consensus, rare in Congress these days, on the urgency to face the Chinese challenge.

Second, Biden has started gathering friends and allies in Asia and Europe who share his concerns about China.

In March, Biden called the first meeting of the heads of state and government of the “Quad”, in which the US, India, Australia and Japan participated, in order to balance China in the region. To address China’s far-reaching vaccine diplomacy, countries agreed to distribute 1 billion doses of vaccines by 2022.

Last week, Biden welcomed Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga as the first head of government to visit Washington. Their joint statement made no mention of China, but did promise that “free and democratic nations that work together” could act to withstand “challenges to the free and open rules-based international order”. You also spoke of ensuring cross-strait peace. This is the first mention of Taiwan by a Japanese prime minister in a joint statement with a US president since 1969.

And for the first time, on March 22, the EU imposed economic sanctions on China for human rights abuses in the Xinjiang Autonomous Region, which acted alongside the US, Canada and the UK.

Third, the Biden government’s $ 1.9 trillion Covid-19 stimulus plan and its upcoming $ 2.3 trillion infrastructure-related investment will keep the US competitive through investment in human capital, physical infrastructure and advanced Improve technology.

The problem is that the same bipartisan consensus in Congress on the Chinese challenge comes with a bipartisan allergy to the kind of multilateral and bilateral trade and investment deals that are required to address Beijing’s dynamic.

Last November, China was one of 15 Asia-Pacific countries, accounting for 30% of global GDP, to sign the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). It was China’s first free trade agreement with its US allies Japan and South Korea, which formed the largest trade bloc in history.

China has also expressed an interest in joining the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (CPTPP). This was the trade deal that eleven countries signed after the Trump administration pulled out of the effort as one of its first acts of government.

Should the RCEP agreement enter into force, which is expected to be before January 2022, and should China be able to join the CPTPP, the international trade agreement in Asia would have largely ended and China would have won.

At the same time, China is making progress on other fronts.

In January, it signed the EU-China Comprehensive Investment Agreement (CAI), much to the dismay of incoming Biden administration officials. (The conclusion of this agreement has stalled in the European Parliament due to new Chinese sanctions against the EU.)

Whatever happens in Brussels, most European countries are eager to sign trade and investment deals with China, which became the EU’s largest trading partner for the first time last year.

The real problem lies in Washington’s lack of alternatives – fueled by the misrepresentation by both parties that globalization has worked against American interests and jobs.

When the Republican Party transformed into the Trump Party, it abandoned the kind of free trade policy that President Ronald Reagan saw as “one of the keys to our nation’s great prosperity.”

While President Barack Obama was negotiating the Trans-Pacific Partnership during his presidency, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton rejected the deal in 2016 after calling it the “gold standard” only three years earlier.

“Both Democrats and Republicans are now advocating ‘a trade policy for the middle class,'” writes Adam Posen of the Peterson Institute in a convincing foreign policy that exposes this approach. “In practice, this appears to mean tariffs and ‘Buy American’ programs aimed at saving jobs from unfair foreign competition.”

Instead, he writes: “Washington should conclude deals that increase competition in the United States and raise tax, labor and environmental standards. It is the self-deceptive withdrawal from the international economy that has failed American workers for the past 20 years , not globalization itself. “

While the Biden government has put its trade agenda on hold, China marches forward – closing deals and setting the standards that will shape the future.

Frederick Kempe is a best-selling author, award-winning journalist, and President and CEO of the Atlantic Council, one of America’s most influential think tanks on global affairs. He worked for the Wall Street Journal for more than 25 years as foreign correspondent, assistant editor-in-chief and senior editor for the European edition of the newspaper. His latest book – “Berlin 1961: Kennedy, Khrushchev, and the Most Dangerous Place in the World” – was a New York Times bestseller and has been published in more than a dozen languages. Follow him on Twitter @FredKempe and subscribe here to Inflection Points, his view every Saturday of the top stories and trends of the past week.

More information from CNBC staff can be found here @ CNBCopinion on twitter.

Categories
Health

Covid instances are falling, however unequal vaccine entry threatens world restoration, WHO says

Worldwide Covid-19 cases are declining, but the uneven distribution of life-saving vaccines could prolong the global economic recovery and leave developing countries even further behind, the World Health Organization said on Wednesday.

In the week ending January 31, 3.7 million new global coronavirus cases were reported, a 13% decrease from the previous week. This emerges from the latest WHO situation report. Covid-19 deaths, which are a few weeks behind new cases, saw a slight 1% decrease over the week.

That’s good news when you consider that 5.5 million cases are injured each week worldwide, but more than 3 million new infections are “still a lot of people,” said Dr. Mike Ryan, Executive Director of the WHO Health Emergencies Program.

“The rain has subsided, but the sun isn’t shining yet,” Ryan said during a live Q&A session at the agency’s Geneva headquarters.

Health experts have warned that new, highly infectious variants of the virus, first identified in the UK, South Africa and Brazil, could already add fuel to furious outbreaks in countries around the world.

A faster transmitting virus could lead to more infections and would ultimately lead to more hospitalizations and deaths if it spreads uncontrollably. But even in areas where the variants have emerged, cases are declining, said Maria Van Kerkhove, director of the WHO’s Department of Emerging Diseases and Zoonosis.

In Great Britain, which identified variant B.1.1.7 in December, cases have decreased by 31% compared to the previous week, according to a WHO report. In South Africa, where a similar variant called B.1.351 was also discovered late last year, cases fell by 44%, the report said.

“This is important because people are scared when they hear mutations, mutants and variants,” said Kerkhove. “We can’t let go of our guard. We can’t let go.”

The emergence of new coronavirus variants did not surprise scientists, as it is normal for viruses to mutate as they spread. Experts fear that some of the strains, particularly variant B.1.351 found in South Africa, could pose a risk to the effectiveness of the vaccines and therapeutics currently available.

Drug makers have claimed that their shots should continue to work against the new variants, but health experts have stressed the importance of containing the spread of the virus to prevent further mutations while countries provide primary care with Covid-19 vaccines .

However, not all countries have had equal access to life-saving medicines.

Of the countries that have started dosed doses to their residents, most were in higher-income countries that claimed early delivery of vials through their own delivery agreements, warned WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

That’s a problem because the vaccines will eventually allow countries to reopen their economies without the risk of an increase in hospital stays and deaths from the virus, Ryan said Wednesday. WHO has voted for countries to sign up for COVAX, a global alliance they jointly lead and aim to deliver coronavirus vaccines to the world’s poorest countries.

The program hopes to deliver 2.3 billion cans by the end of this year. Earlier Wednesday, COVAX officials announced that they had so far provided at least 330 million doses to poorer countries, which are expected to be delivered in late February or early March. These early doses would be used to vaccinate the most vulnerable, such as healthcare workers.

Ryan said this would allow countries to reopen their economies without worrying about putting more strain on their hospital systems. However, this will only be possible if “we can deliver the minimum number of vaccine doses to all countries”.

“If we want our societies to be open, if we want to be on the path to normalizing and normalizing our way of life, we have to be fair in how we distribute the funds to live normally,” said Ryan. “Right now, the uneven distribution of vaccines means that not all societies have an equal chance to get back online, and that’s just not fair.”

– CNBC’s Holly Ellyatt and Reuters contributed to this report.

Categories
Business

Pandemic’s Toll on Housing: Falling Behind, Doubling Up

As the second year of the pandemic begins, millions of tenants are grappling with lost income and the uncertainty of not knowing how long they will have a home. Their savings are exhausted, they have credit card debt to earn the rent, or they have months overdue payments. Families move in together and settle housing costs by finding others to share them.

The nation has a plague of housing instability that celebrated long before Covid-19, and the economic burden of the pandemic only made it worse. Now the financial scars are deepening and the disruptions to family life are becoming more severe. They leave a legacy that will last long after mass vaccination.

As recently as last year, around 11 million households – one in four US renters – were spending more than half of their pre-tax income on housing, and overcrowding was increasing. It is estimated that there are only 36 affordable rental apartments available for 100 very low-income households.

Now the pandemic is increasing the pressure. A study by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia found tenants who had lost jobs due to the pandemic had accumulated $ 11 billion in arrears in rent, while a broader measure by Moody’s Analytics, which includes all criminal tenants, estimated that As of January, they owed $ 53 billion in rent back, utilities, and late fees. Other surveys show that families are increasingly pessimistic about earning their rent for the next month and that they will need less groceries and other essentials to pay bills.

On Friday, President Biden underscored the residential real estate uncertainty that millions have faced as monthly employment data provided fresh evidence of a stalled recovery. The rent support in his $ 1.9 trillion relief plan is essential “to keep people in their homes instead of being thrown on the streets.”

The most desperate, wavering over the surface of a missed payment, are already improvising by moving to even more crowded homes, joining friends and relatives, or taking on lodgers.

Such is the case of Angelica Gabriel and Felix Cesario, residents of a two-story apartment complex in Mountain View, California that is largely inhabited by cooks and waitresses as well as maids and workers – the type of workers hardest hit by the pandemic.

Ms. Gabriel, a fast food worker, and her husband, a landscaper, recently moved out of the bedroom they had shared with their two youngest children, 6 and 8. You are now renting the bedroom to a friend of a friend’s while the couple and children sleep on a mattress in the living room. (Two daughters, 14 and 20, continue to share the other bedroom.)

The agreement kept her up to date by raising $ 850 for the monthly rent of $ 2,675.37 Ms. Gabriel handled on the penny.

“We couldn’t pay the rent ourselves,” she said in Spanish. “Suddenly the hours fell. You couldn’t pay, buy food. “

Such changes aren’t directly reflected in rental rates or credit card bills, but various studies show that disturbed and overcrowded households have a number of effects, including poorer long-term health and a decline in educational attainment.

Given the broader economy, the pain is deepest in the US housing market. Surveys of large landowners, whose units tend to be of higher quality and more expensive, have been remarkably resilient to the pandemic. Surveys of small landlords and low-income tenants show that late fees and debts are mounting.

One measure of relief came when Mr Biden extended a federal eviction moratorium, which was due to expire in late January, by two months as states and cities also extended their own eviction moratoriums. In addition, approved rental aid of $ 25 billion is due to be distributed in December.

But for every million households displaced in the United States each year, there are many more millions who move out before missing out on a payment, cut food and medication to make rent, and take up informal housing that does it exists outside of the traditional landlord-tenant relationship.

Updated

Apr 6, 2021, 2:14 p.m. ET

“What happens in the housing court will miss most people in need,” said Davin Reed, an economist with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.

While rents have fallen in many major cities, vacancy rates for the cheapest buildings are essentially unchanged from last year, according to CoStar Group, a commercial property group. In other words: Nothing about Covid-19 has changed the fact that there has long been a shortage of affordable housing. So if you lose an affordable home, it will still be difficult to find a new one.

And just as subprime mortgages were a leading indicator of the housing crisis in the mid-2000s, informal tenants – roommates and sub-tenants who don’t have proper leases – are now offering a peek below the surface. These low-income and often undocumented immigrants find these apartments through word of mouth, social media, and Spanish-language news sites where single room apartments (“I rent a room with a bed for $ 400”) are a staple of the classifieds ad.

Kaitlin Heinen, an attorney for the Housing Justice Project in Seattle, said she has seen a significant increase in the number of “unauthorized inmates” in which a landlord tries to evict someone for doing it off the books in recent months has deleted roommate in the device. Claas Ehlers, executive director of Family Promise, a nonprofit homeless prevention organization that has more than 200 subsidiaries in 43 states, said people without a lease account for an overwhelming proportion of the group’s requests for rental assistance and assistance.

“We are seeing this domino effect where cheaper, affordable housing is still saturated, and now we are encountering unauthorized residents,” said Ms. Heinen.

It’s a world of money rent and verbal agreements that are unstable and easy to tear apart – a big reason why various studies show that informal renters are more likely to become homeless.

“People who have places to be evicted are better off than those who don’t,” said Marybeth Shinn, a professor at Vanderbilt University who studies homelessness.

John Wickham found his last spot on Facebook. Mr. Wickham, 60, lives in Decatur, Georgia and worked in customer service for a tree pruning company before losing his job last summer. He collected unemployment insurance but could no longer afford the $ 1,200 a month he was paying to live in a residential hotel. So he resorted to subletting $ 600 with a stranger. His girlfriend found it on Facebook Rentals. Mr Wickham has since defaulted on his share of the rent and is looking for a new place.

“We’re trying to find something on our budget and it doesn’t look easy,” he said.

Renters like Mr. Wickham pose a major challenge to governments trying to prevent evictions and stem the flow of homelessness. Consider what happened last year when a federal deadline approached to spend rental aid that went to states through federal CARES law. Despite the strong demand for help, cities and states struggled to get money to tenants, partly because their criteria were too restrictive.

“Our systems are based on these bourgeois models where everyone has documentation for everything,” said Elizabeth Ananat, economics professor at Barnard College. “Much of the world doesn’t work like that, but most of the people who write laws live in the world that works.”

Cities like Los Angeles and Philadelphia have tried to remedy this by switching to cash assistance programs. California lawyers recently passed a bill extending the state’s eviction moratorium and using up to $ 2.6 billion in federal rent subsidies to pay off rent. Legislation allows tenants to apply for rental assistance by filing documents such as bills and school registrations in lieu of a formal rental agreement, as many other city and state rental assistance programs require.

“The state’s housing crisis wasn’t caused by Covid, and this bill alone certainly won’t solve it,” said Governor Gavin Newsom. “While we need to reaffirm housing affordability, this bill protects in a fair and equitable manner from the worst economic effects of the pandemic.”

In California and elsewhere, aid distribution work is largely reserved for nonprofits. They also filled in the gaps. Take Destination: Home, a San Jose organization that works to end and prevent homelessness. In addition to distributing aid under the CARES Act, the group has raised approximately $ 30 million in private donations that it can make available to a wider segment of the population with less limited spending.

Around 40 percent of the organization’s rental subsidies have been distributed to tenants who do not have a traditional lease, said Jennifer Loving, the executive director.

“People we would never have seen are in trouble now,” she said.

One evening in Mountain View, another non-profit organization, the Reach Potential Movement, distributed bread, cereal, milk and diapers to economically stressed families in the apartment complex where Mrs. Gabriel and Mr. Cesario live.

One of the residents, Hilario Saldívar, a 43-year-old cook and dishwasher, saw his hours cut to four hours a day four days a week and is therefore struggling to afford the $ 2,600 monthly that he pays for the two bedroom apartment he shares with his brother, sister, her husband and child. Mr Saldívar never missed a rental payment, but keeping up to date has come at the expense of his meager savings and even his groceries.

“We’re in a tough battle, a sad battle,” he said in Spanish.

His neighbor Rosa Arellano, a 47-year-old mother of three, cleaned schools and offices before she was laid off last year. She is months behind the $ 1,300 rent for her one bedroom apartment. Ms. Arellano recently signed a document with her landlord stating that California law prohibited her eviction for the time being, but she still owed a balance of $ 3,900, which rose to $ 5,200 with the February rent.

After a year of loss of income, she asked, “Where do we get all the money we owe?”

Liliana Michelena contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Health

Why complaints about docs are falling regardless of pressured system

The American healthcare system may buckle under the weight of the coronavirus pandemic, but one number is inexplicably falling.

Disciplinary measures against doctors fell sharply in the first nine months of 2020. The National Practitioner Data Bank, a federal registry of health professionals and institutions, has recorded 4,393 reports of adverse behavior against doctors. Compared to 5,225 reports over the same period in 2019, that’s a decrease of nearly 16%, the U.S. Department of Health told CNBC.

The total includes 3,752 actions taken by government regulatory agencies, compared to 4,521 in the same period in 2019. Also in 2020, 641 doctors had limited or suspended their clinical privileges through September, compared to 704 in the same period last year.

The reasons for the decline are unclear. The pandemic forced widespread delays in non-Covid proceedings. In one study, more than 28 million elective surgeries were delayed or canceled in 2020. Patient advocates also point to the shortage of doctors during the pandemic, the crushes of critically ill patients, and even the heroic status of healthcare workers serving on the front lines of the crisis.

The president of the Federation of State Medical Boards denied that the shortage of doctors was a factor in states taking fewer measures against doctors over the past year.

“The guiding light, our north star, is the protection of the public,” said Dr. Humayun Chaudhry told USA Today in September. “It’s the facts of the complaint and the case. The problem of the workforce is not taken into account in individual cases.”

However, the decline in reports to the National Practitioner Data Bank almost certainly doesn’t mean the problem physicians’ problem is gone, patient safety experts say, despite extensive reforms in recent years.

“The mechanism is there. Indeed, it is required. And yet it does not work,” said Dr. Lucian Leape, Professor of Retired Health Policy at the Harvard School of Public Health.

Leape, whose 1994 publication “Error in Medicine” is widely recognized as revolutionizing the profession’s approach to medical errors, founded the Lucian Leape Institute, a think tank to improve patient safety.

Leape told CNBC’s American Greed that despite numerous safeguards – such as requiring incidents to be reported to the database and doctors being certified and assessed regularly – there are still too many incentives to maintain the status quo.

“Even if you get it right,” he said, “people fight back viciously because their livelihoods are at stake. And that’s a deterrent. Nobody wants to spend their time in court defending the fact that they’re doing this Guy asked to go. “

Activate ‘Dr. Death’

Leape is quick to point out that problem physicians are a tiny part of the profession. However, their effects can be catastrophic.

Neurosurgeon Christopher Duntsch, who came to be known as “Dr. Death,” was able to practice in at least four Texas hospitals over a period of three years, despite dozens of botched surgeries and two patient deaths. In 2017, a Texas judge sentenced 49-year-old Duntsch to life imprisonment for deliberately injuring an elderly person.

This photo from the Dallas County Jail shows Christopher Duntsch. A Texas jury found the neurosurgeon guilty on Tuesday, February 14, 2017 of mutilating patients who had turned to him for surgery to fix debilitating injuries.

Dallas County Jail via AP

The patient, 74-year-old Mary Efurd, became paraplegic after Duntsch botched her spinal surgery. Fellow surgeon Robert Henderson, who took care of Efurd after the incident, told CNBC’s American Greed that the complications were so severe that he wondered if Duntsch was really a doctor.

“I couldn’t imagine someone taking an anatomy class in medical school doing so much harm,” said Henderson.

In fact, Duntsch had an extensive and real resume, including a medical degree from the University of Tennessee at Memphis and a prestigious scholarship in spinal surgery.

Duntsch did not respond to several American Greed requests for comment.

Prosecutors said Duntsch could stay active that long because of the many cracks in a system designed to root out bad doctors. Alleged safeguards include a requirement to report incidents to the National Practitioner Data Bank, which Congress set up specifically in 1986 to prevent problem doctors from moving from hospital to hospital.

Two days after a committee at Baylor Plano Hospital in Dallas found that Duntsch had violated his standard of care in two botched operations, Duntsch simply resigned instead of being discharged. A fire would have been reported to the database. There was no resignation.

The hospital has since changed its name to Baylor Scott & White Health. Spokeswoman Jennifer McDowell declined to go into details of the case.

“Dr. Duntsch, who started his career in North Texas with impressive references and excellent referrals, ended up hurting families, employees, and the trust we all have in doctors,” McDowell said in an email. “Out of respect for the affected patients and families and the privilege of a number of details, we will continue to limit our comments. There is nothing more important to us than serving our community through high-quality, trustworthy healthcare.”

In another case, Dallas Medical Center granted Duntsch temporary privileges. He wasn’t hired. The reporting requirements for the database only apply to employees.

“Everyone knows when to get in touch, and no one likes breaking someone’s reputation,” said Michelle Shugart, Dallas County’s assistant district attorney who prosecuted Duntsch. “And so they are using these little techniques to find ways to avoid reporting someone.”

In a statement to American Greed, Dallas Medical Center spokesman Vince Falsarella said the facility had been in new ownership since Duntsch’s time there.

“The administration that existed at that time is no longer in the hospital,” he wrote. “Dallas Medical Center has a thorough physician certification process in place that meets all industry standards, best practices, and guidelines and regulations from the National Practitioner Data Bank to ensure the safety of our patients.”

Another hospital, the Legacy Surgical Center in Frisco, north of Dallas, said it had changed hands since Duntsch began practicing there. The fourth, University General in Houston, has closed.

None of the hospitals have been charged with criminal misconduct. The Texas Department of Health fined Baylor Plano $ 100,000 for violating the state’s administrative law in 2014, but subsequently overturned the finding without explanation.

Shugart believes some facilities were motivated by something more sinister than just avoiding the hassle of reporting a bad doctor.

“Neurosurgeons are one of the most lucrative aspects of the hospital business,” she said. “The financial incentives are a big part of what drives him and the people around him.”

Leape, the patient safety expert, said bad doctors don’t operate alone.

“These people have enablers,” he said. “This neurosurgeon didn’t take his patients out of thin air. Doctors refer patients. Neurosurgeons receive their patients from other doctors.”

Attention patient

To make matters worse, patients have few options to see a doctor in advance. The National Practitioner Database is confidential to the general public – you can find out the number of complaints, but not the doctors or institutions behind them.

For this reason, Leape believes it is important for patients who have had a bad experience with a doctor to report it.

“You need to make some noise,” he said. “You should go to the board of directors of the hospital and say, ‘You have to do something about this person’.”

Ultimately, Leape believes the rules need to be tightened. He advocates a federal patient safety agency to enforce standards and remove bad doctors, rather than the current patchwork of state regulators and hospital committees.

“We ask people to regulate their own profession and regulate themselves, and people just can’t,” he said.

Leape said hospitals – large chains in particular – have begun to prioritize patient safety. But he said that consciousness can only go so far.

“The systems are only as good as the people in them,” he said. “Systems work when people make them work.”

See how Christopher Duntsch got the nickname “Dr. Death” and how he got away with it for so long. Check out a NEW American Greed on Monday, February 1st at 10pm ET / PT on CNBC only.

Categories
Business

Why ultra-low price service Spirit Airways is falling behind

Spirit Airlines, the low-cost airline known for bright yellow planes, sassy style and cheap fares, helped revolutionize the way we pay for travel. To balance the tariffs, the carrier charges everything from hand luggage to bottles of water.

As of 2019, Spirit Airlines has been profitable for 13 consecutive years. However, since then the airline has gotten into tough times.

With the coronavirus pandemic that crashed passenger traffic, Spirit announced total revenue of $ 402 million in the third quarter, a 60% year-over-year decrease.

To keep passengers safe and on board, Spirit requires face coverings for passengers and crew, disinfects the aircraft with fog machines, and waives some change fees. But is it enough? And will Spirit Airlines be able to recover from the economic fallout from the aviation industry?

See more:

Why GNC filed for bankruptcy protection despite the boom in vitamin sales
Why rural hospitals go bankrupt