Categories
World News

Afghanistan Reside Updates: Taliban Enter Kabul, Authorities Collapses as President Flees

Here’s what you need to know:

Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

Afghanistan’s government collapsed on Sunday with President Ashraf Ghani’s flight from the country and the Taliban’s entry into the capital, effectively sealing the insurgents’ control of the country after dozens of cities fell to their lightning advance.

On Sunday evening, former President Hamid Karzai announced on Twitter that he was forming a coordinating council together with Abdullah Abdullah, chairman of the Afghan delegation to peace talks, and Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, the leader of the Hesb-i-Islami party, to manage a peaceful transfer of power. Mr. Karzai called on both government and Taliban forces to act with restraint.

As it became clear that members of the Taliban had entered Kabul, the capital, thousands of Afghans who had sought refuge there after fleeing the insurgents’ brutal military offensive watched with growing alarm as the local police seemed to fade from their usual checkpoints.

At 6:30 p.m. local time, the Taliban issued a statement that their forces were moving into police districts in order to maintain security in areas that had been abandoned by the government security forces. Taliban fighters, meeting no resistance, took up positions in parts of the city, after Zabiullah Mujahid, spokesman for the Taliban, posted the statement on Twitter.

“The Islamic Emirates ordered its forces to enter the areas of Kabul city from which the enemy has left because there is risk of theft and robbery,” the statement said. The Taliban had been ordered not to harm civilians and not to enter individual homes, it added. “Our forces are entering Kabul city with all caution.”

As the sun set behind the mountains in the western part of the city, the traffic was clogged up as crowds grew bigger, with more and more Taliban fighters appearing on motorbikes, police pickups and even a Humvee that once belonged to the American-sponsored Afghan security forces.

Earlier in the afternoon, Interior Minister Abdul Sattar Mirzakwal announced that an agreement had been made for a peaceful transfer of power for greater Kabul, and that his forces were maintaining security.

“The city’s security is guaranteed. There will be no attack on the city,” he said. “The agreement for greater Kabul city is that under an interim administration, God willing, power will be transferred.”

Mr. Mirzakwal later announced a 9 p.m. curfew in the capital, and called on its residents to go home.

Mr. Ghani left in a plane for Uzbekistan with his wife, Rula Ghani, and two close aides, according to a member of the Afghan delegation in Doha, Qatar, that has been in peace negotiations with the Taliban since last year. The official asked not to be named because he did not want to be identified speaking about the president’s movements.

In a Facebook video, Mr. Abdullah, former chief executive of the Afghan government, criticized Mr. Ghani for fleeing.

“That the former president of Afghanistan has left the country and its people in this bad situation, God will call him to account and the people of Afghanistan will make their judgment,” Mr. Abdullah said in the video.

In negotiations being managed by Mr. Abdullah, Mr. Ghani had been set to travel to Doha on Sunday with a larger group to negotiate the transfer of power, but flew instead to Uzbekistan, the peace delegation member said.

Mr. Ghani had resisted pressure to step down. In a recorded speech aired on Saturday, he pledged to “prevent further instability” and called for “remobilizing” the country’s military. But the president was increasingly isolated, and his words seemed detached from the reality around him.

With rumors rife and reliable information hard to come by, the streets were filled during the day with scenes of panic and desperation.

“Greetings, the Taliban have reached the city. We are escaping,” said Sahraa Karimi, the head of Afghan Film, in a post shared widely on Facebook. Filming herself as she fled on foot, out of breath and clutching at her headscarf, she shouted at others to escape while the could.

“Hey woman, girl, don’t go that way!” she called out. “Some people don’t know what is going on,” she went on. “Where are you going? Go quickly.”

Wais Omari, 20, a street vendor in the city, said the situation was already dire and he feared for the future.

“If it gets worse, I will hide in my home,” he said.

The United States military stepped up its evacuation of American diplomatic and civilian staff. A core group of American diplomats who had planned to remain at the embassy in Kabul were being moved to a diplomatic facility at the international airport, where they would stay for an unspecified amount of time, according to a senior United States official.

On the civilian side of the airport, a long line of people waited outside the check-in gate, unsure if the flights they had booked out of the country would arrive.

After days in which one urban center after another fell to the insurgents, the last major Afghan cities that were still controlled by the government, other than Kabul, were seized in rapid succession over the weekend.

The insurgents took Mazar-i-Sharif, in the north, late on Saturday, only an hour after breaking through the front lines at the city’s edge. Soon after, government security forces and militias — including those led by the warlords Marshal Abdul Rashid Dostum and Atta Muhammad Noor — fled, effectively handing control to the insurgents.

On Sunday morning, the Taliban seized the eastern city of Jalalabad. In taking that provincial capital and surrounding areas, the insurgents gained control of the Torkham border crossing, a major trade and transit route between Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The Taliban offensive, which started in May when the United States began withdrawing troops, gathered speed over the past week. In city after city, the militants took down Afghan government flags and hoisted their own white banners.

Despite two decades of war with American-led forces, the Taliban have survived and thrived, without giving up their vision of creating a state governed by a stringent Islamic code.

After the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in the 1990s, movie theaters were closed, the Kabul television station was shut down and the playing of all music was banned. Schools were closed to girls.

Despite many Afghans’ memories of years under Taliban rule before the U.S.-led invasion in 2001, the insurgents have taken control of much of the country in recent days with only minimal resistance.

Their rapid successes have exposed the weakness of an Afghan military that the United States spent more than $83 billion to support over the past two decades. As the insurgents’ campaign has accelerated, soldiers and police officers have abandoned the security forces in ever greater numbers, with the cause for which they risked their lives appearing increasingly to be lost.

Leaving Kabul, the Afghan capital, on Sunday as the Taliban looked set to take over.Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

Panic gripped the Afghan capital, Kabul, Sunday as Taliban fighters started arriving in the city, inmates broke out of the main prison on the east side of the city, and the American-backed government appeared to crumble.

By the afternoon, President Ashraf Ghani was reported to have fled. And as American forces focused their energies on evacuation flights for embassy staff and other personnel, Afghan government officials were shown in video footage accepting a handover of power to their Taliban counterparts in several cities.

Early in the day, senior Afghan politicians were seen boarding planes at Kabul airport. Bagram Air Base was taken by Taliban forces midday Sunday as was the provincial town of Khost in eastern Afghanistan, according to Afghan media reports. The fall of Khost was part of a domino-like collapse of power of astonishing speed that saw city after city fall in just the last week, leaving Kabul as the last major city in government hands.

Interior Minister Abdul Sattar Mirzakwal announced in a video statement in the early afternoon that an agreement had been made for a peaceful transfer of power for greater Kabul and sought to reassure residents, saying that the security forces would remain in their posts to ensure security in the city.

“As the minister of interior, we have ordered all Afghan National Security Forces divisions and members to stabilize Kabul,” he said in a video statement released on the Facebook page of the ministry at 2 p.m. local time. “The city’s security is guaranteed. There will be no attack on the city. The agreement for greater Kabul city is that under an interim administration, God Willing, power will be transferred.”

But residents seemed unconvinced by their leaders’ assurances. In the center of the city people were pictured painting over advertisements and posters of women at beauty salons, apparently preparing for a takeover by the fundamentalist Taliban who do not allow images of humans or animal life, and have traditionally have banned music and the mixing of the sexes.

The Taliban denied rumors that their chief negotiator, Mullah Abdul Ghani Baradar, was already in the capital and preparing to take over control at the Interior Ministry.

Throughout the day, surreal scenes played out as it appeared ever more clear the Taliban were taking over.

The insurgency has long had its own power structure of shadow governors appointed for every province, and Sunday it was clear who was in control in strategic areas. The governors and tribal and political leaders who had been in power were shown in videos formally handing control to their Taliban counterparts in the strategic cities of Kandahar, the main stronghold of the south, and in Nangarhar, the main city of the east.

But in Kabul fears of the city being overrun were running high after a breakout of prisoners, many of them members of the Taliban, from the main prison at Pul-i-Charkhi.

“Look at this, the whole people are let free,” a man said as he filmed a video footage of people carrying bundles walking away from the prison, posted on Facebook. “This is the Day of Judgment.”

The breakout seems to have been by the prisoners from the inside, rather than an attack by Taliban forces from the outside.

Some Afghans still found room for humor amid the chaos: “Taliban have reached Kabul airport … their speed is faster than 5G,” one resident of Kabul posted on Facebook.

But others fled, though it is unclear where they could go with the Taliban in control of so much of the country.

“Greetings, the Taliban have reached the city. We are escaping,” said Sahraa Karimi, the head of Afghan Film, in a post shared widely on Facebook. Filming herself as she fled on foot, out of breath and clutching at her head scarf, she called on passers-by to get away.

Ruhullah Khapalwak contributed reporting.

The entrance to the United States embassy in Kabul after staff were evacuated to the airport on Sunday.Credit…Wakil Kohsar/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

KABUL, Afghanistan — As the Taliban entered Kabul on Sunday, completing the near total takeover of Afghanistan two decades after the American military drove them from power, an eerie quiet that had enveloped the city in recent days transformed into chaos.

A frenzied evacuation of U.S. diplomats and civilians kicked into high gear, while Afghans made a mad dash to banks, their homes and the airport. Crowds of people ran down the streets as the sound of gunfire echoed in downtown Kabul.

Helicopter after helicopter — including massive Chinooks with their twin engines, and speedy Black Hawks that had been the workhorse of the grinding war — touched down and then took off loaded with passengers. Some shot flares overhead.

Those being evacuated included a core group of American diplomats who had planned to remain at the embassy in Kabul, according to a senior administration official. They were being moved to a compound at the international airport, where they would stay for an unspecified amount of time, the official said.

The runway of the airport was filled with a constellation of uniforms from different nations. They joined contractors, diplomats and civilians all trying to catch a flight out of the city. Those who were eligible to fly were given special bracelets, denoting their status as noncombatants.

On the civilian side of the airport, a long line of people waited outside the check-in gate, unsure if the flights they had booked out of the country would arrive.

For millions of Afghans, including tens of thousands who assisted the U.S. efforts in the country for years, there were no bracelets. They were stuck in the city.

Rumors abounded: The Taliban were in the city, or weren’t they? Were the Americans securing the palace?

The streets of the city were packed, and many shops were closed. Traffic barely moved.

At one bank in downtown Kabul, hundreds of people clambered to get in once doors opened. Two men tried to climb a barred gate into the building.

At Abdul Haq Square in the center of the capital, five men who appeared to be Taliban fighters gathered as cars drove by showing their support for the militants.

Two other men, outside the American Embassy, said that they had just been freed by the Taliban from the giant Pul-e-Charkhi Prison.

On one street downtown, a pair of police officers said that they were readying for a fight with the Taliban and had changed into militia clothing. Another group of officers, none with weapons, seemed more curious about whether a house in the once coveted and protected green zone was now empty.

Some police officers appeared to have abandoned their usual checkpoints, leading to speculation that the government was no longer in control.

At a bus station in Kabul, members of the Afghan security forces were seen changing into civilian clothes as they waited for transport to their hometowns.

While President Biden has defended his decision to hold firm and pull the last U.S. troops out of Afghanistan by Sept. 11, his administration has become increasingly worried about images that could evoke a foreign policy disaster of the past: the fall of Saigon at the end of the conflict in Vietnam in 1975.

The swift advance of the Taliban has stunned many in the White House.

On Sunday, as a sense of panic gripped Kabul, guards at checkpoints inside the fortified green zone, who typically stop vehicles and check identity cards, lifted their metal barriers and waved all the cars through as the neighborhood drained of foreigners.

Convoys of armored vehicles raced to find safety in the headquarters of what had been the NATO center for its Operation Resolute Support. Others flocked to the Serena Hotel, a heavily fortified hotel popular among foreigners.

At the NATO center, military personnel handed out matchbox-size cardboard containers with ear plugs, and corralled people onto the helicopters. As the aircraft took off for the international airport, dozens of people evacuating got their last glimpses of the capital below — the fate of the city hanging in the balance.

Two Marines, standing by the runway at the Kabul airport, acknowledged that they were living a moment of history. A little earlier, they said, someone walked by after exiting one of the helicopters cradling a poorly folded American flag: It had just come down off the embassy.

Fahim Abed, Fatima Faizi, Thomas Gibbons-Neff, Christina Goldbaum, Sharif Hassan, Jim Huylebroek, Najim Rahimand Lara Jakes contributed reporting.

A man carrying the distinctive white flag of the Taliban directing traffic in Kabul on Sunday.Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

Confusion reigned in Washington early Sunday as the Taliban entered Kabul, Afghanistan’s capital, with U.S. officials scrambling to determine how safe Americans still there would be.

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken was expected to discuss the crisis on three television news shows on Sunday morning, hours after the American Embassy in Kabul closed and its small core of remaining diplomats fled to the capital’s international airport for safety.

Embassy staff had begun a vigorous effort to destroy documents and other sensitive materials before leaving the sprawling compound. A fourth senior U.S. official would not say whether the chargé d’affaires, Ross Wilson, and his immediate circle of advisers would remain at a diplomatic facility at the Kabul airport or return to the United States with other Americans who were being evacuated.

The Biden administration has repeatedly warned the Taliban against taking Kabul by force or even entering the city while the immense evacuation effort is underway, a process that could take days or even weeks to complete. Zalmay Khalilzad, the chief American envoy who has been negotiating with the Taliban in Doha, Qatar, has sought to broker a deal to reduce violence as the extremist group seized control of most of Afghanistan.

At the same time, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., the head of the military’s Central Command, has flown to the gulf region to oversee the military operations in Afghanistan. The Central Command’s forward headquarters is in Qatar.

A Defense Department official said Sunday that Bagram Air Base, the headquarters of the 20-year American war effort in Afghanistan, had also fallen to the Taliban.

Taliban fighters entered the base — which the United States turned over last month to Afghan security forces — on Sunday, the official said. More ominously, Taliban forces have also taken nearby Parwan prison, where thousands of prisoners, including Qaeda fighters, had been housed.

Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III and Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, raced to the Pentagon on Sunday morning for meetings on the unfolding crisis.

Senator Ben Sasse, Republican of Nebraska, who sits on the Intelligence Committee, called Afghanistan’s rapid deterioration an “unmitigated disaster” and blamed President Biden and former President Donald J. Trump for the troop withdrawals that Mr. Sasse said caused the country’s undoing.

“History must be clear about this: American troops didn’t lose this war — Donald Trump and Joe Biden deliberately decided to lose,” the senator said in a statement on Sunday morning.

“The looming defeat will badly hurt American intelligence and give jihadis a safe haven in Afghanistan, again,” Mr. Sasse said. “America will regret this.”

With their seizure of Jalalabad on Sunday, the Taliban appeared to be on the verge of a complete takeover of Afghanistan. Planes departing the airport in Kabul, the capital, were filled with people fleeing the city.

American and Afghan soldiers attended a handover ceremony at a military camp in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, in May.Credit…Afghan Ministry of Defense, via Associated Press

With the Taliban on the verge of regaining power in Afghanistan, President Biden has defended his decision to leave the country after two decades of U.S. military involvement.

In a statement on Saturday, Mr. Biden said that the United States had invested nearly $1 trillion in Afghanistan over the past 20 years and had trained and equipped more than 300,000 Afghan security forces, including maintaining the Asian country’s air force.

“One more year, or five more years, of U.S. military presence would not have made a difference if the Afghan military cannot or will not hold its own country,” Mr. Biden said. “And an endless American presence in the middle of another country’s civil conflict was not acceptable to me.”

Mr. Biden’s statement came hours after the Taliban seized Mazar-i-Sharif, in northern Afghanistan, but before the group captured the eastern city of Jalalabad on Sunday, The group entered Kabul, the capital, on Sunday as President Ashraf Ghani fled.

Mr. Biden partly blamed President Donald J. Trump for the unfolding disaster in Afghanistan, saying that the deal made with the Taliban in 2020 had set a deadline of May 1 this year for the withdrawal of American forces and left the group “in the strongest position militarily since 2001.”

“I faced a choice — follow through on the deal, with a brief extension to get our forces and our allies’ forces out safely, or ramp up our presence and send more American troops to fight once again in another country’s civil conflict,” Mr. Biden said.

This year, a study group appointed by Congress urged the Biden administration to abandon the May 1 deadline and slow the withdrawal of American troops, saying that a strict adherence to the timeline could lead Afghanistan into civil war. Pentagon officials made similar entreaties, but Mr. Biden maintained his long-held position that it was time for Afghanistan to fend for itself.

Since international troops began withdrawing in May, the Taliban have pursued their military takeover far more swiftly than U.S. intelligence agencies had anticipated. On Saturday, Mr. Biden accelerated the deployment of 1,000 additional troops to Afghanistan to help ensure the safe evacuation from Kabul of U.S. citizens and Afghans who worked for the American government. That deployment will temporarily bring to 5,000 the number of American troops in the country.

In his statement, Mr. Biden warned the Taliban that “any action on their part on the ground in Afghanistan, that puts U.S. personnel or our mission at risk there, will be met with a swift and strong U.S. military response.”

Displaced Afghan women pleading for help from a police officer in Kunduz, Afghanistan, last month.Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

A high school student in Kabul, Afghanistan’s war-scarred capital, worries that she now will not be allowed to graduate.

The girl, Wahida Sadeqi, 17, like many Afghan civilians in the wake of the U.S. troop withdrawal and ahead of a Taliban victory, keeps asking the same question: What will happen to me?

The American withdrawal, which effectively ends the longest war on foreign soil in United States history, is also likely to be the start of another difficult chapter for Afghanistan’s people.

“I am so worried about my future. It seems so murky. If the Taliban take over, I lose my identity,” said Ms. Sadeqi, an 11th grader at Pardis High School in Kabul. “It is about my existence. It is not about their withdrawal. I was born in 2004, and I have no idea what the Taliban did to women, but I know women were banned from everything.”

Uncertainty hangs over virtually every facet of life in Afghanistan. It is unclear what the future holds and whether the fighting will ever stop. For two decades, American leaders have pledged peace, prosperity, democracy, the end of terrorism and rights for women.

Few of those promises have materialized in vast areas of Afghanistan, but now even in the cities where real progress occurred, there is fear that everything will be lost when the Americans leave.

The Taliban, the extremist group that once controlled most of the country and continues to fight the government, insist that the elected president step down. Militias are increasing in prominence and power, and there is talk of a lengthy civil war.

Over two decades, the American mission evolved from hunting terrorists to helping the government build the institutions of a functioning government, dismantle the Taliban and empower women. But the U.S. and Afghan militaries were never able to effectively destroy the Taliban, who sought refuge in Pakistan, allowing the insurgents to stage a comeback.

The Taliban never recognized Afghanistan’s democratic government. And they appear closer than ever to achieving the goal of their insurgency: to return to power and establish a government based on their extremist view of Islam.

Women would be most at risk under Taliban rule. When the group controlled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001, it barred women from taking most jobs or receiving educations and practically made them prisoners in their own homes — though this was already custom for many women in rural parts of the country.

“It is too early to comment on the subject. We need to know much more,” Fatima Gailani, an Afghan government negotiator who is involved in the continuing peace talks with the Taliban, said in April. “One thing is certain: It is about time that we learn how to rely on ourselves. Women of Afghanistan are totally different now. They are a force in our country — no one can deny them their rights or status.”

The United States kept forces in Afghanistan far longer than the British did in the 19th century, and twice as long as the Soviets — with roughly the same results.Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

If there is a consistent theme over two decades of war in Afghanistan, it is the overestimation of the results of the $83 billion the United States has spent since 2001 training and equipping the Afghan security forces and an underestimation of the brutal, wily strategy of the Taliban.

The Pentagon had issued dire warnings to President Biden even before he took office about the potential for the Taliban to overrun the Afghan Army. But intelligence estimates indicated that it might happen in 18 months, not within weeks.

Commanders did know that the afflictions of the Afghan forces had never been cured: the deep corruption, the failure by the government to pay many Afghan soldiers and police officers for months, the defections, the soldiers sent to the front without adequate food and water, let alone arms.

Mr. Biden’s aides say that the persistence of those problems reinforced his belief that the United States could not prop up the Afghan government and its military in perpetuity. In Oval Office meetings this spring, he told aides that staying another year, or even five, would not make a substantial difference and was not worth the risks.

In the end, an Afghan force that did not believe in itself and a U.S. effort that Mr. Biden, and most Americans, no longer believed would alter events combined to bring an ignoble close to America’s longest war. The United States kept forces in Afghanistan far longer than the British did in the 19th century, and twice as long as the Soviets — with roughly the same results.

For Mr. Biden, the last of four American presidents to face painful choices in Afghanistan but the first to get out, the debate about a final withdrawal and the miscalculations over how to execute it began the moment he took office.

“Under Trump, we were one tweet away from complete, precipitous withdrawal,” said Douglas E. Lute, a retired general who directed Afghan strategy at the National Security Council for Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama.

“Under Biden, it was clear to everyone who knew him, who saw him pressing for a vastly reduced force more than a decade ago, that he was determined to end U.S. military involvement,” Mr. Lute added, “but the Pentagon believed its own narrative that we would stay forever.”

He continued, “The puzzle for me is the absence of contingency planning: If everyone knew we were headed for the exits, why did we not have a plan over the past two years for making this work?”

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken this month at the State Department.Credit…Pool photo by Brendan Smialowski

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken said on Sunday that the defeat of Afghan security forces that has led to the Taliban’s takeover “happened more quickly than we anticipated,” although he maintained the Biden administration’s position that keeping U.S. troops in Afghanistan was not in American interests.

“This is heart-wrenching stuff,” said Mr. Blinken, who looked shaken, in an interview on CNN after a night that saw members of the Taliban enter the Afghan capital, Kabul, and the shuttering of the U.S. Embassy as the last remaining American diplomats in Afghanistan were moved to a facility at the city’s airport for better protection.

Mr. Blinken stopped short of saying that all American diplomats would return to the United States, repeating an intent to maintain a small core of officials in Kabul.

But he forcefully defended the administration’s decision to withdraw the military from Afghanistan after 20 years of war, saying it could have been vulnerable to Taliban attacks had the United States reneged on an agreement brokered under President Donald J. Trump for all foreign forces to leave the country.

“We would have been back at war with the Taliban,” Mr. Blinken said, calling that “something the American people simply can’t support — that is the reality.”

He said it was not in American interests to devote more time, money and, potentially, casualties, to Afghanistan at a time that the United States was also facing long-term strategic challenges from China and Russia. But, Mr. Blinken said, American forces will remain in the region to confront any terrorist threat against the United States at home that might arise from Afghanistan.

He also appeared to demand more conditions for the prospect of recognizing the Taliban as a legitimate government or establishing a formal diplomatic relationship with them.

Earlier, the Biden administration had said the Taliban, in order to acquire international financial support, must never allow terrorists to use Afghanistan as a haven, must not take Kabul by force and must not attack Americans.

On Sunday, Mr. Blinken said the Taliban must also uphold basic rights of citizens, particularly women who gained new freedoms to go to work and school after the Taliban were ousted from power in 2001.

There will be no recognition of a Taliban government “if they’re not sustaining the basic rights of the Afghan people, and if they revert to supporting or harboring terrorists who might strike us,” the secretary of state said.

Mr. Blinken’s comments were swiftly criticized by the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Representative Michael McCaul of Texas, who said the Taliban’s swift takeover of Afghanistan “is going to be a stain on this president and his presidency.”

“They totally blew this one,” Mr. McCaul said. “They completely underestimated the strength of the Taliban.”

“I hate to say this: I hope we don’t have to go back there,” he said. “But it will be a threat to the homeland in a matter of time.”

Categories
World News

Ethiopian Forces Retreat in Tigray, and Rebels Enter the Capital

MEKELLE, Ethiopia — In a major turn in Ethiopia’s eight-month civil war in the northern Tigray region, Tigrayan fighters began entering the regional capital Monday night after Ethiopian government troops retreated from the city.

The Ethiopian military has occupied the Tigray region since last November, after invading in cooperation with Eritrean and militia forces to wrest control from the regional government. The Tigrayan fighters, known as the Tigray Defense Forces, spent months regrouping and recruiting new fighters, and then in the past week began a rolling counterattack back toward the capital, Mekelle.

New York Times journalists in Mekelle saw thousands of residents take to the streets on Monday night, waving flags and shooting off fireworks after hearing that Tigrayan forces had advanced to the city.

The Tigrayans’ rapid advance was a significant setback for the government of Ethiopia’s prime minister, Abiy Ahmed, who had declared when he sent his forces into the restive Tigray region last year that the operation would be over in a matter of weeks.

Sisay Hagos, a 36-year-old who was celebrating in Mekelle on Monday, said, “They invaded us. Abiy is a liar and a dictator, but he is defeated already. Tigray will be an independent country!”

Refugees and international observers have accused the invading forces of wide-ranging atrocities, including ethnic cleansing, and of pushing the region to the brink of famine.

But from the outset, the party in control of Tigray’s regional government, known as the Tigrayan People’s Liberation Front, or T.P.L.F., which for many years was the ruling party in Ethiopia, has vowed to resist.

Soldiers belonging to the Ethiopian National Defense Forces were seen leaving Mekelle in vehicles throughout the day on Monday, some of them with looted materials, according to international and aid workers. Soldiers also entered the compound of Unicef and the World Food Program, and disconnected the internet, they said. Shops in the city closed early.

Politicians with the interim government that had been installed in Tigray by Ethiopia’s central government have also retreated from Mekelle, and some were already back in the Ethiopian capital, Addis Ababa, the international officials said.

The recent shifts in Mekelle followed more than a week of escalating violence and troop movements in the Tigray region. Heavy weapons were part of the fighting on both sides, and key towns reportedly changed hands among Ethiopian, Eritrean and Tigrayan forces, U.N. security documents show.

The Tigray Defense Forces have in recent weeks captured areas south of Mekelle that until recently were controlled by soldiers from the neighboring country of Eritrea, which had allied with the Ethiopian government. The rebels say they have captured several thousand Ethiopian soldiers and are holding them as prisoners of war.

Ethiopian forces reportedly abandoned a number of strategic positions around Adigrat, Abiy Adiy and in several locations in southern Tigray.

Getachew Reda, an executive member of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front, said in a telephone interview last week that Tigrayan forces — which have mushroomed with thousands of new volunteers — have gone on the offensive, targeting four Ethiopian army divisions.

“We have launched an offensive at the divisions which we believed were critical,” Mr. Getachew said. “At the same time they have abandoned many towns and cities.”

Declan Walsh reported from Mekelle, Ethiopia, and Simon Marks from Brussels, Belgium.

Categories
Business

Daimler expects intense competitors if Apple, Alibaba enter automobile market

LONDON – The CEO of Daimler in Germany believes the automaker will face stiff resistance from tech giants like Google, Apple and Alibaba if it decides to launch its own electric vehicles.

While the tech giants haven’t started selling their own cars just yet, reports suggest they could soon launch products that combine hardware and software if the electric vehicle race gets hot.

“There will be intense competition,” Daimler boss Ola Kallenius told CNBC’s Annette Weisbach on Thursday when he was asked if he was concerned about the entry of digital companies into the electric vehicle market.

“When an industry changes, I think it is natural for new players to look at the industry,” he said.

Kallenius said Daimler will “look at what the brand stands for and carry that into the next technological age,” adding that the company will be able to build on its position if it does well.

His comments come when Mercedes Benz, owned by Daimler, launches an electric version of its flagship S-class luxury sedan.

“It’s kind of the beginning of a new era,” said Kallenius, before adding that the new vehicle was very “curious”.

Prices for the luxury sedan will be announced this summer, but Kallenius said Daimler expects to make money on the vehicle from the time it is sold.

He added that the variable cost of vehicles with a large electric battery is higher than that of vehicles with a traditional internal combustion engine.

“Our task in this decade of transformation is on the one hand to reduce variable costs and restore margin parity in all of our segments,” said Kallenius.

Electric vehicle technology is “still in its infancy” and there is “a lot to be done,” he continued. “It will be scaled and we will have technological developments. I am optimistic that we can restore the margins to which we are accustomed.”

Daimler versus Tesla

Daimler’s shares have risen by more than 173% year-on-year in the past 12 months and were quoted on Thursday at 75 euros per share.

“We have positive momentum in our stock,” said Kallenius, adding that this was due to improved financial performance and the company’s “technology strategy for the future.”

However, Daimler’s market capitalization has fallen from around 185 billion euros today in 1998 to just 80 billion euros. Meanwhile, Tesla’s market capitalization has risen to $ 694 billion.

“Now if we look at the total market capitalization of every single auto player in the world, you get an impressive number,” said Kallenius.

He added, “We need to make sure that the distribution of that total market cap is moving more in our favor. We are working on that.”

Like other automobile manufacturers, Daimler’s business was negatively impacted by the global shortage of chips.

“We can currently sell more than we produce,” said Kallenius

Categories
Business

New Suitor Could Enter Fray for Tribune Publishing

A deal that would transform the American newspaper industry ran into complications just a month after a deal was reached, said three knowledgeable people. As a result, New York hedge fund Alden Global Capital may have to fend off a new applicant for Tribune Publishing, the chain that owns major city-wide daily newspapers nationwide, including The Chicago Tribune, The Daily News and The Baltimore Sun, People said.

On February 16, Tribune Publishing’s largest shareholder, Alden, agreed with a 32 percent stake to buy the rest of the chain for $ 630 million. On the deal, Alden would take ownership of all of the Tribune Publishing newspapers – and then outsource The Sun and two smaller Maryland newspapers to a nonprofit owned by Maryland hotel magnate Stewart W. Bainum Jr is controlled.

For the past few days, Mr. Bainum and Mr. Alden have been arguing over the details of the company agreements that would go into effect when the Maryland papers transition from one owner to another. In response, Mr. Bainum has taken the first step to bid for the entire Tribune Publishing.

Mr Bainum has asked the Tribune Publishing Special Committee, a group of three independent board members, for permission to be released from a nondisclosure agreement that bans him from discussing the deal so that he can pursue partners for a new offering, people said.

A spokeswoman for Mr Bainum said he had no comment. Through a spokesman, the Tribune Publishing Special Committee declined to comment. An Alden spokesman had no comment.

Alden has been investing in the newspaper business for more than a decade. Through a subsidiary, the MediaNews Group, the company owns around 60 daily newspapers, including The Denver Post and The San Jose Mercury News. The deal to take over the rest of Tribune Publishing would make it an even bigger force in the news media industry, by some standards the second largest newspaper company after Gannett, the company that publishes one-fifth of all American newspapers, including USA Today.

Journalists have criticized Alden for drastically reducing the costs of its newspapers, often by laying off journalists and reducing local coverage. Over the past year, journalists from several Tribune newspapers have run public campaigns urging local benefactors to buy the newspapers they are employed in so they don’t fall under the control of the hedge fund. Alden claims that it is the rare company that keeps local newspapers from going out of business.

The Alden Tribune deal requires approval from shareholders who own approximately two-thirds of Tribune Publishing shares that Alden does not own. The largest holder of these stocks, with a combined stake of nearly 25 percent, is Patrick Soon-Shiong, the biotech billionaire who owns the Los Angeles Times with his wife Michele B. Chan. Dr. Soon-Shiong, who owns enough of Tribune Publishing to veto the deal himself, has refused to comment on the Alden-Tribune agreement. He declined to comment on Mr. Bainum’s plan on Sunday.

If Mr Bainum manages to reach an arrangement to buy Tribune, he would likely seek local owners for his other newspapers, which include The Hartford Courant, The Orlando Sentinel, and The South Florida Sun Sentinel.

Two of the people said Mr. Bainum, who lives in suburban Maryland, Washington, was willing to put $ 100 million in a bid and then ask for additional investment from others. Since 1997, Mr. Bainum has served as the chairman of Choice Hotels, a multi-billion dollar company that owns the Comfort Inn, Quality Inn, and MainStay Suites brands, a company that grew out of his father’s business.

Alden has been aiming for full ownership of Tribune Publishing since 2019 when it was announced that the company had purchased its 32 percent stake. Last year, an agreement to buy the rest of the company was not reached with an offer valued at $ 520 million for the entire company.

Tribune announced last month that it was holding $ 99 million in cash at the end of 2020. In December, it also announced the sale of a majority-owned subsidiary for $ 160 million.

Categories
Business

Bud Mild to launch arduous seltzer lemonade as new rivals enter market

All four flavors of Bud Light Seltzer Lemonade

Bud Light

Bud Light is launching a range of Hard Seltzer sodas to make a solid claim on the increasingly competitive category.

The Anheuser-Busch InBev brand entered the market for hard seltzer a year ago as part of a broader push by the parent company. Anheuser-Busch InBev also owns the seltzer maker Bon & Viv. As beer consumption has declined in recent years, brewers have turned to the hard seltzer to increase sales.

In the 52 weeks ending December 26, retail sales of selters rose 160% to $ 4.1 billion, according to Nielsen data. The trend started with the popularity of White Claw, owned by Mike’s Hard Lemonade brewer Mark Anthony Brands, but newcomers have boosted sales even further. Coca-Cola is entering the fray this year with Topo Chico Hard Seltzer, its first alcoholic beverage in the US since 1983, through a partnership with Molson Coors Beverage.

According to Euromonitor International, White Claw still holds more than half of the market share for hard seltzer through 2019. Truly Spiked & Sparkling, owned by Boston Beer, ranks second with a 28% share. At almost 10%, Bon & Viv is a distant third.

According to Bud Light, the success of its seltzer helped the beer brand gain more market share in 2020 than it has over the past five years. Its strong performance coincided with the coronavirus pandemic, which led more consumers to drink alcohol at home rather than in bars. AB InBev’s shares, valued at $ 122 billion, fell 13% last year after falling 8.2% in volume in the first nine months of last year.

“When we looked at the different types of seltzer, we tried to differentiate a segment of seltzer,” said Andy Goeler, vice president of marketing at Bud Light.

The seltzer was first launched with mainstream flavors like strawberry and black cherry, but Bud Light launched a special “ugly sweater” package with seasonal flavors for eight weeks over the holidays. The thematic beverage pack is sold out, said Goeler.

For his next seltzer innovation, Bud Light landed on lemonade, which has great appeal. According to Nielsen data, hard seltzer lemonade retailed just $ 313.97 million in the 52 weeks ended December 26. However, thanks to early entrants such as Truly’s version, the segment is growing much faster than that of hard seltzer. Nielsen data found that retail sales during this period were more than nine times higher than last year.

Bud Light tries to beat the competition by improving the taste. The brand ran blind taste tests for consumers and tweaked the recipe until Bud Light Seltzer Lemonade beat the competition every time.

“This one will have a much bolder lemonade taste,” said Goeler. “Again, we want to make sure we get the best lemonade.”

However, the nutritional profile of Seltzer lemonade is still in line with what consumers are looking for at Seltzer, which is widely considered a healthier alcoholic beverage compared to beer. It’s 100 calories and contains less than 1 gram of sugar.

After more than six months of development, the drink will hit shelves on January 18th. The 12-ounce cans will be available in packs of 12 with all four flavors: original lemonade, peach lemonade, black cherry lemonade, and strawberry lemonade.

While lemonade is usually thought of as a summer drink, Bud Light is confident of bringing the new drink to market in the dead of winter.

“The advantage of the release is that there is enough time to bring the product to market before spring begins,” said Goeler. “Things will pick up in the summer as with all beer sales and Selters is starting to follow that year-round demand.”

Promotion of the drink begins with commercials that air during the NFL playoffs, which begin Saturday. The ads play with the idea that grandma’s lemonade tastes best. Actors say the hard seltzer tastes better, leading to retribution from grandmothers.

Categories
Health

Israel to enter third nationwide lockdown regardless of profitable Covid vaccination marketing campaign

Despite its early success with the introduction of the Covid-19 vaccine, Israel is quickly facing a third national lockdown amid the spread of the virus.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and members of his cabinet blame a faster spread, first seen in the UK last month. Israeli officials confirmed four cases of the strain on December 23, days after British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said it was an emerging problem.

An ultra-Orthodox Jewish man receives a vaccination against coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as Israel continues its national vaccination campaign during a third national COVID lockdown at a Maccabi Healthcare Services office in Ashdod, Israel, on December 29, 2020.

Amir Cohen | Reuters

In a cabinet meeting Tuesday, Netanyahu told ministers, “We are in a state of emergency” as ministers agreed to a lockdown beginning Friday that closes schools, non-essential businesses and forces residents to be within a kilometer of their homes to stop.

It does so amid a global turmoil over a slow adoption of vaccines in the US and elsewhere that Israel largely avoided.

Tom, 69, and Judy Barrett, 67, of Marco Island wait in line early in the morning at the Lakes Park Regional Library to receive the COVID-19 vaccine in Fort Myers, Florida, the United States, on Dec. 30, 2020 . 2020.

Andrew West | USAToday | Reuters

Israeli officials have boasted that the country vaccinated more people in the first nine days of its vaccination campaign than it has had Covid-19 infections since the pandemic began.

The country had already vaccinated around 7% of its 9.2 million inhabitants last week. The Israeli Ministry of Health plans that up to 90% of the “at risk” population will receive their second of two shots from the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine within the next 25 days.

The effectiveness of its vaccination campaign has made it a potential model for the rest of the world, epidemiologists say.

Israel has an early advantage, said Dr. Itamar Grotto, Deputy Director General of the Israeli Ministry of Health and one of those responsible for the prosecution. “We have a national vaccination registry that was set up a few years ago. The whole country is in one database,” he said in an exclusive interview with CNBC.

Registration was started to ensure that children get all of their recordings. This infrastructure enabled Israel to be better prepared for this outbreak than many other countries fighting the virus. Israel had a terrifying dry run for Covid-19 when it was hit by a wild-type poliovirus outbreak in 2013.

The country brought this disease under control with an intensive vaccination campaign that paved the way for today’s vaccine database.

Israel’s medical infrastructure offers several other advantages, he said:

  • Medical care in Israel is largely socialized.
  • Israel only has four health organizations serving citizens across the country while many other nations have more competition in the system.
  • These HMOs are all linked to the country’s national health service, which keeps records of every Israeli citizen.
  • The whole system will be digitized under a single national system.

Before packages containing the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine arrived in Israel on December 9, a government-appointed panel began clarifying who would get the shots in the first wave.

Cardboard boxes containing the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine are being prepared for shipment at the Pfizer Global Supply Kalamazoo manufacturing facility in Portage, Michigan on December 13, 2020.

Morry Gash | Pool | Reuters

At the same time, the Ministry of Health began setting up a communication and distribution system so that the vials of the vaccine could arrive immediately, he said.

Patients in the database of the first group who received the vaccine were given an appointment via email, text, or an online registration form with a date and time period to receive their shot. Regular clinics, community centers, hospitals and some sports stadiums have been converted into vaccination centers and staffed with previously trained health care workers awaiting action, he said.

Because the vaccine cannot be frozen after thawing, Israel is encouraging vaccination site managers to use any dose.

According to Grotto, there is a ready list of people who can intervene at short notice if other people fail to show up at the end of the day. Officials at distribution centers also divide the vials into smaller packages suitable for each center. This is another attempt at avoiding waste.

However, the challenges facing Israel are far from over. Health officials recently confirmed that nearly 500 doses were wasted in the south of the country because health workers failed to get enough people ready to come to vaccination centers.

Israel expects more deliveries from Pfizer. Business has also been made with Moderna and AstraZeneca, but these recordings have not yet been delivered. But they are expected soon. Israel is also working on its own vaccine, but there is no word on when it will be ready.

Categories
Entertainment

Evaluate: This ‘Nutcracker’ Is a Fantasy You Can Enter

You may have seen the “Nutcracker” countless times. It might be a holiday tradition to see it every year. But have you ever been inside

This weekend, I was standing in front of a house I had never been to before, but familiar music made it seem like a place I’d known for a long time. Then the door opened and I went straight to the ballet.

This dreamy experience – and how it’s sustained – is the great performance of The Nutcracker at Wethersfield, which BalletCollective is running through December 23rd at the Wethersfield Estate in Amenia, NY. (The production is also streamed for free on his website December 23-26.)

Wethersfield is a find. A red brick Georgian house with antique drawing rooms surrounded by formal gardens and complemented with a big top. It’s a near-perfect “nutcracker” set. Or more than a set: the place you always imagined, a fantasy that you can enter.

This particular achievement is linked to a more fundamental one. Most, if not all, of the living “Nutcrackers” in the area have been canceled, including the one most important to the cast of this production. Its artistic director and choreographer Troy Schumacher and almost all of his 23 dancers are members of the New York City Ballet, whose benchmark Balanchine production they will not perform this year. (A 2019 recording will be broadcast on Marquee TV through January 3rd.)

However, during the pandemic, a haunted “nutcracker” is possible on a remote property. During this carefully designed operation, masked guests group themselves in seven to eight socially distant pods, self-selected groups of two to six people. I say “guests” because you can’t exactly buy tickets. Pandemic restrictions don’t allow that. Instead, underwriters who contribute at least $ 5,000 are invited to bring a group. Forty percent of the slots are offered for free to local nonprofits and key workers – and some critics like me, so we can tell the story.

A more intimate “nutcracker,” this is a pared-down one in some ways. For the opening party scene, it’s just the core family – mom and dad, Fritz and Marie (played by adults) – plus an avuncular Drosselmeyer with a gift for magic and three pods from audience members huddling in the corners. However, it is remarkable how much is preserved: the cozy atmosphere, two dance toys, four giant mice.

The Tchaikovsky music is played, but some guests experience an interlude in an ornate room in which violinist Lauren Cauley plays a piece by the composer “Sleeping Beauty” (in a new electroacoustic arrangement by Darian Donovan Thomas). It’s a nice addition to the party and also part of the not-entirely-flawless pace and spacing – it occupies the first few guests while later arrivals see a repeat of the opening section. In places where the process comes to a standstill, you can observe and admire the still impressive mechanism.

If you peer through the windows from the outside, you will witness bedtime and the arrival of the mice. Each target group sees a different point of view. In my case, all of the actors – Drosselmeyer, the father, a mouse – couldn’t resist playing around with a chess board as if they had all seen “The Queen’s Gambit”.

Most of the fresh specialties are like this: small, sweet. The human-sized nutcracker crosses swords with the mouse king in a courtyard and scares him instead of killing him and without the help of Marie. But then we follow the nutcracker in amazement.

At the edge of an oval pool, in the distance we watch a wonderfully framed “waltz of snowflakes”, whose dancers give their best on a grassy slope. We follow topiary paths strewn with fairy lights into the tent, where a table is set for each capsule, on which are fake and untouchable delicacies.

In the middle there is a stage, which means that you can dance properly. most of the usual diversions from Act II – minus “coffee” and “tea” and their ethnically stereotypical pitfalls. Mr. Schumacher’s choreography is appropriate and skilfully meets the challenge of an in-the-round staging with occasional bliss, but without any real magic.

The dancing was good too, up to the standards of the city ballet but not the heights of the city ballet. As can happen in the Balanchine production, the Sugarplum Fairy (Ashley Laracey, who takes turns with Sara Mearns) was outshone by Dewa, Mira Nadon, who shone with amplitude and ballerina authority amid eight waltz flowers.

But while part of the goal of this production is to get members of a great company dancing again, it’s not really about great choreography or great dancing. It’s also not really about the whole Nutcracker story, some of which is left behind in favor of the trip. After we leave the house, we never see Marie and her family again. It’s like we’ve become them.

This transformation is the real magic of this solution to a pandemic problem. What I found most moving was the pantomime with which the dancers and some ushers led us through the ballet. This was danced with kind permission, a warm welcome and, like the setting, it took me right into the heart of a ballet that luckily I hadn’t missed.

The Nutcracker in Wethersfield

Until December 23 at Wethersfield Estate, Amenia, NY; and streaming 23.-26. December, nutcrackeratwethersfield.com.

Categories
World News

What to Know as Troubled Afghan Peace Talks Enter a New Part

KABUL, Afghanistan – After four decades of fierce fighting in Afghanistan, peace negotiations between the Afghan government and the Taliban have at least opened the possibility that the long cycle of violence may one day end.

But that milestone is still a long way off. The most recent round of discussions, which started in September, was fraught with bureaucratic problems and months of debates on minor issues.

And although these talks resulted in an agreement on the principles and procedures that will guide the next round of peace negotiations, they came with a price. As the two sides met in Doha, Qatar, bloodshed on battlefields and in Afghan cities rose sharply.

Now that the peace talks are due to resume on January 5th, details of the next negotiations remain unclear.

While both the Afghan government and the Taliban have announced that they will not publicly publish their priority lists for the next round of negotiations, security analysts, researchers, and government and Taliban officials expect the following – and what hinders these talks must be overcome.

The ultimate goal of the negotiations is to establish a political roadmap for a future government. The head of the government’s negotiating team, Masoom Stanikzai, said Wednesday that a ceasefire would be the delegation’s top priority. The Taliban, who have leveraged attacks against security forces and civilians, are instead trying to negotiate a form of government based on strict Islamic laws before discussing a ceasefire.

However, it will not be easy to get to these larger fundamental questions as both sides continue to cling to the meanings of fundamental terms such as “ceasefire” and “Islamic”. There are many forms of ceasefire, from permanent and federal to partial and conditional, yet the public portion of the February US-Taliban agreement calling for the full withdrawal of American troops mentions but does not specifically mandate or fully define them how it should look.

The Taliban also refuse to specify what they mean by “Islamic” and the government’s insistence on an “Islamic” republic has been the subject of intense debate.

“The Taliban say they want an Islamic system, but they don’t specify which ones,” said Abdul Haific Mansoor, a member of the Afghan negotiating team, pointing out that there are almost as many systems as there are Islamic countries.

The next round of talks will also be made more difficult by the Taliban’s demand that the government release more Taliban prisoners. The government’s release of more than 5,000 prisoners removed the final barrier to negotiations in September, but President Ashraf Ghani has so far refused to release any more.

Both sides used the violence on the ground in Afghanistan as leverage during the Doha negotiations, but the Taliban have been more aggressive in their attacks than the government, whose troops tend to stay at bases and checkpoints to respond to sustained attacks.

According to a New York Times review, the number of security forces and civilians rose during the ongoing talks in the fall, before the Afghan government and Taliban negotiators announced in early December that they had reached an agreement on procedures for future talks had cold weather likely contributed to the decline as well. At least 429 pro-government forces were killed in September and at least 212 civilians were killed in October – the worst tolls in any category in more than a year.

“The killing and bloodshed have reached new heights,” said Atiqullah Amarkhel, a military analyst in Kabul. “What kind of will for peace is that?”

Ibraheem Bahiss, an independent Afghan research analyst, said the Taliban are pursuing two paths simultaneously: violence and negotiation.

“Your goal is to come to power and have a particular system of government,” said Bahiss. “Whether they achieve it through conversation or through fighting, both of them have costs that they are willing to bear.”

Although the Taliban have greatly reduced direct attacks on US forces since February, the insurgent group has relentlessly expanded the territory it controls by besieging local security forces.

In response, the Americans have launched air strikes where Afghan troops were under extreme stress during the Taliban’s attacks. One Taliban official said the level of violence in the group was direct response to air strikes from the United States or to military and poorly received diplomatic action by the Afghan government.

US air strikes this fall rescued the crumpled defenses of Afghan units in Kandahar and Helmand provinces, revealing deficiencies in Afghan ground and air forces that are under constant attack. US officials said the deteriorating morale of the armed forces has raised concerns about General Austin S. Miller, commander of the US-led mission in the country.

At the same time, the number of American troops dropped from around 12,000 in February to an estimated 2,500 by mid-January. A full withdrawal is planned by May, when the deal goes into effect. This has left Afghan officials unsure of how their forces can survive without American support.

The importance of the talks with the United States was underscored in November when Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Doha and met with negotiators, and again in mid-December when the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General Mark A. Milley, did the same.

A Pentagon statement said General Milley urged the Taliban to “reduce violence immediately,” a term that American officials have used several times this year and that is open to a wide range of interpretations. US officials are trying to balance the battlefield.

Both sides are also waiting to see whether President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. will stick to the troop withdrawal schedule or possibly renegotiate the entire deal.

If Mr Biden decides to leave any remaining American anti-terrorist military force in Afghanistan after May 2021, as suggested by some US lawmakers, Mr Bahiss said, “The Taliban have made it clear that the entire deal would be void.”

In light of the allegations and suspicions in Doha, some Afghan analysts fear that talks could stall for months.

“The distrust between the two sides has increased violence, but nothing has been done to eradicate that distrust,” said Syed Akbar Agha, a former leader of the Taliban’s Jaish-ul Muslim group.

This could indefinitely delay serious attempts to address core government issues such as human rights, free press, rights for women and religious minorities, and democratic elections, among others.

Taliban negotiators have stated that they support women’s rights, for example, but only under strict Islamic law. Many analysts interpret this as the same harsh oppression of women practiced by the Taliban when they ruled Afghanistan from 1996 to 2001.

The deeply divided government in Kabul also fears that the Taliban will try to shorten the time before all American forces depart, while the Taliban claim that Mr Ghani, who was re-elected in a bitterly controversial election last spring, stands still to serve out his five year tenure. If a form of national unity or an interim government were agreed, Mr Ghani would be unlikely to remain in office.

Another complication is the division within the Taliban, from stubborn commanders in Afghanistan to political negotiators in Doha’s hotels. Some Taliban factions believe they should fight and defeat the Americans and the Afghan government, not negotiate with them.

Mr. Agha, the former Taliban leader, said little progress was likely unless an impartial mediator emerged that could destroy the lack of confidence in Doha.

“If not,” he said, “I don’t think the next round of talks will end with a positive result.”

Some analysts fear an even more threatening result. Torek Farhadi, a former advisor to the Afghan government, said: “One thing is clear – without an agreement we are facing civil war.”

Najim Rahim, Fahim Abed and Fatima Faizi reported from Kabul.

Categories
World News

U.S. inventory futures rise as Wall Avenue set to enter final week of 2020

Traders work on the trading floor of the New York Stock Exchange.

NYSE

The stock futures rose slightly in night trading on the Sunday before the last trading week of 2020.

The futures on the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 149 points. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were also trading in slightly positive territory.

President Donald Trump signed a $ 900 billion law on Covid-19 that prevented the government from closing and expanded unemployment benefits to millions of Americans. The signing came days after Trump proposed vetoing the legislation and calling for $ 2,000 in direct payments to Americans instead of $ 600.

“I’m signing this bill to restore unemployment benefits, stop evictions, provide rental support, add money for PPP, get our airline employees back to work, add significantly more money to distribute vaccines, and much more,” Trump said in a statement on Sunday evening.

Wall Street has had a quiet week of holidays with major averages posting flat returns. The S&P 500 fell 0.2% last week as some investors took off year-end chips. The 30-share Dow gained 0.1% over the same period.

Profit taking could rise in the last week of the year, which has seen surprisingly high returns so far. The S&P 500 is up 14.6% year-to-date, while the Dow is up 5.8%. The Nasdaq is up 42.7% this year as investors preferred high-growth technology names amid the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic.

Dr. Anthony Fauci warned on Sunday that the country could see a surge in new Covid-19 infections after Christmas and New Years. Two vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna started the distribution process this month. To date, over a million people have been vaccinated in the United States.

Subscribe to CNBC PRO for exclusive insights and analysis as well as live business day programs from around the world.