Categories
Politics

Gary B. Nash, 88, Dies; Drew Ire for Attempting to Replace Historical past Schooling

Before he became famous as Mr. Limbaughs bête noire, Dr. Nash widely recognized as a leading figure in so-called New Left History who rejected the discipline’s traditional focus on elites as movers of history in favor of everyday life.

His book “Red, White and Black: The Peoples of Early America” ​​(1974), for example, looked at the colonial era through the eyes of Indians, working class whites, and free and enslaved blacks.

Although he spent the rest of his life in Los Angeles, Dr. Nash was fond of Philadelphia and often used his hometown to illustrate his man-on-the-street approach. In “The Urban Crucible: The Northern Seaports and the Origins of the American Revolution” (1979), a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize, he examined how political ideas among sailors, dockworkers and other workers in Philadelphia – including Boston and New York – played a crucial role in the independence movement.

“It changed the focus of what people were doing from the standard study of ideology and ideas to the actions of ordinary people on the ground,” said Mary Beth Norton, a historian at Cornell University, in an interview.

Dr. Nash saw a continuation between his approach to history and his commitment to contemporary education and grassroots politics. After the Watts Riots in 1965, he joined an organization that supported black entrepreneurs. He was working to liquidate Pacific Palisades, the affluent area of ​​Los Angeles where he lived. And after the university’s Board of Regents fired black activist Angela Davis from her post as professor of sociology, Dr. Nash set up a faculty committee to reinstate her.

Although his critics often labeled him anti-American – or worse – Dr. Nash insisted he was optimistic about the country.

“If you were a radical left historian in the United States, you would not have written what he did. He’s always been optimistic about the United States, ”said Carla Pestana, a PhD student with Dr. Nash studied and is now the chairman of UCLA’s history department. “He thought the real story was about common people trying to make the country better.”

Categories
Business

President Biden’s first formal tackle drew practically 27 million viewers.

Almost 27 million people watched President Biden’s first official address at a joint congressional session on Wednesday evening, to a large television audience these days but a much smaller audience than similar speeches by other presidents, according to Nielsen’s data.

The speech, which aired on all major networks and cable news networks starting at 9:00 p.m. Eastern Time, attracted a much larger television audience than the Oscars program, which aired on ABC on Sunday and was watched by approximately 10 million people. The audience, however, was significantly smaller than that for President Donald J. Trump’s first official address to Congress in 2017, which was attended by 48 million people.

The television audience for Mr. Biden’s address also lagged behind that for equivalent speeches from other recent presidents. Barack Obama had an audience of 52 million in 2009; George W. Bush pulled 40 million in 2001; and Bill Clinton’s first address was seen by 67 million in 1993.

Several factors contributed to the lower ratings. Due to public health and safety concerns at the Capitol, Mr. Biden’s speech came later in his presidency than that of his youngest predecessors, all of which took place in February. There was also less pomp on Wednesday. Instead of a personal audience of 1,600 Senators, Supreme Court justices, and other dignitaries who sat on the cheek with members of the House of Representatives, only 200 people were in attendance due to socially distant restrictions.

TV audience ratings have generally declined in recent years as more people have canceled cable subscriptions in favor of streaming, a shift accelerated by pandemic viewing habits. And the number of people watching TV in spring tends to be lower compared to winter.

According to Nielsen, ABC had the largest audience for the address at around 4 million viewers, and MSNBC was right behind at 3.9 million. Fox News and the Fox Broadcasting Networks had the smallest audience with 2.9 million viewers (Fox News) and 1.6 million viewers (Fox Broadcast).

The Fox audience stepped in for post-anchor analysis and commentators and the Republican counter-argument from South Carolina Senator Tim Scott. In the 30 minutes following the address, Fox News was the only network with an increase in viewership, averaging 3.2 million viewers.

The analysis of the language was different depending on the network. Fox News agent Ben Domenech called Mr. Biden’s speech a “handkerchief of lies”. On MSNBC, anchor Brian Williams referred to it as “Rooseveltian in size and girth”.

Categories
Business

Apple and Google Reduce Off Parler, an App That Drew Trump Supporters

According to a group of Amazon employees, Amazon assists Parler in operation by hosting its web traffic on its servers. These employees and at least one member of Congress have asked Amazon to ban Parler from this service, which could jeopardize its viability. Amazon did not respond to a request for comment.

Apple’s action is more of an issue for Parler than Google, as Apple requires all iPhone apps to go through the App Store. Google cut Parler out of its flagship Android app store, but it also allows apps to be downloaded from elsewhere, so Android users can still find the Parler app, just with a little more work. Parler will continue to be available through web browsers on phones and computers.

Before Apple blocked Parler on Saturday, Apple had given the company 24 hours to improve moderation and avoid being removed from the App Store. During this time, Parler appeared to have tried to remove some areas that appeared to call for violence.

For example, L. Lin Wood, an attorney who sued to overturn Mr. Trump’s election loss, wrote on Parler Thursday morning: “Prepare the firing squad. Pence goes first. “According to a screenshot in the Internet archive, the post was viewed at least 788,000 times. The post was removed on Saturday morning.

In a text message, Mr. Matze said the item had been removed “in accordance with Parler’s Terms of Use and Anti-Incitement to Violence Rules”. He said he wasn’t sure Apple knew Parler removed the post.

In a statement to Parler on Saturday, Apple said it had “continued to find direct threats of violence and incitement to illegal activity” in the app. Apple informed the company that its app cannot be approved in the App Store until “you have demonstrated your ability to effectively moderate and filter the dangerous and harmful content of your service”.

In an interview, Jeffrey Wernick, Parler’s chief operating officer, blamed “a culture of abandonment at Apple” for the company’s poor prospects. He said he would advise other platforms not to try and compete on Apple’s App Store. “Because if you raise money and attract investors and end up like Parler, what is it about?” he said.