Categories
World News

Russia Doesn’t Ship U.S. Investor to Jail however Nonetheless Sends a Warning

MOSCOW – A Russian court on Friday sentenced an American businessman, who is one of the country’s most prominent foreign investors, to five and a half years suspended sentence in a penal colony for embezzlement conviction, undermining Russia’s ability to attract foreign investment.

The suspended sentence for businessman Michael Calvey, founder of Baring Vostok, a private equity firm with $ 3.7 billion in assets under management, means he has no time in Russia’s notoriously harsh penal colony system, the successor to the Gulag Camp, unless he is in breach of probation.

However, the risk of jail time that Mr Calvey and his six co-defendants still face in the case was expected to dampen foreign interest in doing business in Russia, where FDI is already hampered by weak property rights and Western sanctions.

The ruling became all the more worrying for business leaders when, despite deteriorating ties with the West, Calvey had consistently advocated investment in Russia despite many companies pulling out of the country.

Mr. Calvey, 53, founded Baring Vostok in the 1990s, shortly after the collapse of communism, with the aim of bringing investors into Russia’s newly capitalist economy. In its 27 years in business, the company has attracted billions of dollars in private equity capital for Russian companies like Yandex, a search engine that competes locally with Google, and Ozon, an online retailer.

The co-defendants, including Philippe Delpal, a French national and senior executive at Baring Vostok, received similar suspended sentences in the Russian prison system.

The case arose out of a business dispute with shareholders in a Siberian bank.

Prosecutors said Mr. Calvey and other executives of his fund embezzled 2.5 billion rubles (about $ 34 million) by persuading the bank’s shareholders, Vostochny Bank, to inflate a stake in another company Accept price.

In his defense, Mr. Calvey argued that the bank’s shareholders had full access to information about the value of the shares when they accepted them in lieu of repaying a loan and that the case should also have been resolved through commercial arbitration.

“I came to Russia and stayed here because I loved this country from the start and believed that Russia had the potential to become one of the world’s leading investment markets,” Calvey said in a closing statement at his trial last month .

“I convinced investors to share my confidence in Russia’s future,” he said. “Even after 2014, when the geopolitical climate deteriorated and sanctions were imposed on Russia, I continued to defend Russia’s image as an attractive country to work and invest in.”

Calvey’s investment drive continued despite two decades of corporate government takeovers, ruble devaluations, and politically tinged arrests, including Sergei L. Magnitsky, who died on custody and worked as an attorney for another prominent foreign investor, William F. Browser.

Russia’s once richest man, Mikhail B. Khodorkovsky, the founder of an oil company, was convicted twice and sentenced to long prison terms in the penal colonies.

The conditions there are tough. In a prison, Mr. Khodorkovsky was stabbed in the face with a homemade knife. The guard said another detainee was blocking unwanted sexual advances, which Mr. Khodorkovsky denied.

Mr. Calvey’s investment firm had focused on internet and retail start-ups that benefited from the riches of the petroleum industry and successfully served the country’s emerging middle class.

The arrest and detention of Mr Calvey and his colleagues in 2019 raised fears that executives at other American companies might be similarly arrested in a climate of strained relations with the United States. The seven executives were convicted by a Russian court on Thursday and sentenced on Friday.

During his detention, Mr. Calvey continued to speak out in favor of the investment case for Russia and read statements about it at hearings from the aquarium in which defendants are being held in Russian courts.

Russian entrepreneurs are often the target of market shakes and shadowy plans to steal assets, said Russia’s own corporate ombudsman. Arrests are common. Today, around one in ten prisoners in Russia’s penal colonies are white-collar criminals.

Government revenues from commodity exports such as oil and natural gas, which flow regardless of what Russian courts do in the country, have left the country’s investment climate largely unconcerned, economists noted. And an independent judicial system that would help investors could also weaken control over the political opposition.

“Russia is in what could be described as an investment pause,” said Natalia Akindinova, a researcher at the Higher School of Economics, in an interview.

Categories
Health

Dr. Anthony Fauci says speak of Covid booster photographs does not imply vaccines aren’t working

The Senior Medical Advisor to the White House, Dr. Anthony Fauci told CNBC on Tuesday that Covid booster vaccinations are currently unnecessary.

“The discussion about boosters is really adequate preparation on the part of the [drug] Company are working with the NIH and CDC and others to be prepared in the event you may need a boost, “Fauci said in the Squawk Box.

“But if you translate that into ‘We’re going to need a boost; everyone is going to get a boost’, that’s not appropriate. We still haven’t vaccinated enough people in the main part of it,” he added, emphasizing the booster discussion. ” has absolutely nothing to do with the effectiveness of the vaccine “.

With schools reopening in the fall and the spread of new coronavirus variants, questions are circulating about the need for booster vaccinations, even if the pace of primary vaccinations in the US has slowed since the spring.

On Monday, Pfizer officials met with federal health officials to advocate for the potential need for Covid boosters as the drug company prepares for US approval of a third dose of its current vaccine.

Pfizer announced last week that it is also developing a booster vaccine to combat the highly transmissible Delta variant – now the dominant strain of the virus in the US – and said the immunity was boosted by its Two, developed with German partner BioNTech Shot vaccine wears off.

However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Food and Drug Administration released a joint statement blaming Pfizer’s insistence on a third dose, saying that fully vaccinated Americans do not currently need a booster dose.

The officials’ conversation with Pfizer was mostly “a courtesy meeting,” Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, also told CNBC on Tuesday. He said the real question right now is how long protection against the vaccines will last and at what level of protection, a view shared by other health experts.

Former Obama administration official, Dr. Kavita Patel told CNBC on Monday ahead of the Pfizer meeting that booster shots seem like “inevitable” due to newer variations, but questioned when it will happen. She also stressed that when discussing boosters in the US, it is important to take into account the global impact on vaccine adoption in other parts of the world.

Dr. Ashish Jha, dean of Brown University’s School of Public Health, told CNBC on Friday that he had “seen no evidence yet of anyone needing a third injection”.

According to CDC data, the majority of Americans were vaccinated with Pfizer, followed by the two-shot Moderna vaccine and Johnson & Johnson’s single-shot course. More than 184 million people in the United States, or 55.5% of the population, have had at least one injection. Almost 160 million people, or 48% of the population, are fully vaccinated.

Fauci also told CNBC on Tuesday that he would be “amazed” if Pfizer, Moderna and J & J’s coronavirus vaccines don’t get full approval from US drug regulators. These three vaccines are the only ones approved by the FDA in the United States, and they were approved for emergency approval.

Categories
Entertainment

In ‘Luca,’ a Character’s Incapacity Doesn’t Outline Him

In a small fishing boat on the glittering Mediterranean Sea, Alberto Scorfano’s eyes land on Massimo Marcovaldo’s right arm, which ends at his shoulder. Massimo catches him staring and Alberto’s eyes pop out. Massimo looks at his shirt sleeve, which is pinned up with a fishhook.

“A sea monster ate it,” he growls.

“Hm? What? ”Alberto gasps.

Massimo relaxes into a laugh. “Mom, no. That’s how I was born. “

He hauls in his fishing net, clamps a lost piece of driftwood between his teeth and slices it out of the net with his left arm.

“Whoah”, Alberto exhales.

This scene, which appears roughly in the middle of “Luca”, the latest Pixar film (streaming on Disney +), takes the rare step of depicting a character with different limbs – without making them a defining characteristic. The story takes place in the fictional coastal town of Portorosso on the Italian Riviera and tells the story of Luca Paguro (voiced by Jacob Tremblay) and Alberto (Jack Dylan Grazer), both young sea monsters who explore the human world.

In Portorosso, Luca and Alberto meet Giulia (Emma Berman), a red-haired outsider who is determined to win the city’s annual triathlon.

Enter Massimo (Marco Barricelli) – Giulia’s single father – an imposing fisherman who sings along with arias on the radio while he cuts off fish heads for dinner. At first glance, his stature and fish spears intimidate the two boys. After the boat scene, however, the tide begins to turn: Luca and Alberto find their way into Massimo’s big heart.

Since the movie was streamed last month, the internet has praised Massimo’s character for skillfully showing a limb difference on screen. The filmmakers said the decision that the fisherman was born with one arm was very deliberate.

“We really thought long and hard about how we could achieve a representation that was true to the place and time,” said director Enrico Casarosa. “When the Massimo idea came up, I think we came up with the idea pretty quickly.”

The film is set in post-war Italy, where Casarosa spent his childhood, and originally the director imagined that Massimo, modeled on the anti-fascist journalist Italo Calvino, fought the Italian resistance during World War II. Maybe he lost his arm in battle, thought Casarosa.

Or maybe he was born that way. To ponder the details of Massimo’s character, the “Luca” team – including Casarosa and producer Andrea Warren – decided to consult with disability rights activist and filmmaker Jim LeBrecht.

“It was a really rich conversation,” said LeBrecht, co-director of the Oscar-nominated documentary “Crip Camp,” which was released last year.

Together they concluded that the line “This is how I was born” felt right. Like Luca and Alberto, Massimo was born differently. The fisherman was skillful with his limbs all his life and remained a loved, respected and vital part of his community.

“Let’s go beyond these tragic stories, these ancient tropics where someone with a disability only appears in a story when it is about their disability,” said LeBrecht. “And let’s do what we’ve done with other marginalized communities over the years and let’s just say, ‘Let’s look, we’re part of the fabric of society.'”

LeBrecht was born with spina bifida, a disease of the spinal cord, and now uses a wheelchair. “Crip Camp” accompanies him and other former summer campers from Camp Jened in New York State, which was created for young people with disabilities, years later through their fight for accessibility laws.

“Jim shared some very difficult stories with people responding to his physical presence and asking children,” Warren said. “But sometimes there is this interaction with children looking or wondering.”

These stories helped shape Massimo’s response as Alberto responded to his disability. And it’s not an uncommon experience for people with limb differences.

Sheriauna Haase, 14, saw “Luca” the day it came out when she and her family were visiting Niagara Falls for Father’s Day. (Her two brothers, ages 4 and 5, had been demanding to see it all day.)

The aspiring high school student and dancer is a congenital amputation; she was born without her left hand. She immediately noticed the fishing boat scene and laughed at the line “A sea monster ate it”. Sometimes she finds her own answer to the question “What happened to your arm?”

“If they stared I’d say, ‘Yeah, I actually got into a shark attack. My arm was bitten by a shark, ”said Haase. “And after that I feel bad because the look on their faces is so shocked and scared. ‘Oh my god, I’m so sorry.’ And I say, ‘No, I’m kidding, I’m kidding. I was just born that way. ‘”

Representation is important to Haase. And with nearly 2 million people living limbless in the United States, Hollywood is starting to take care. But there’s a fine line between organic representation and forced tokenization, as producer Warren pointed out.

“You can’t tick every box on every movie,” she said. “It has to be authentic to make sense. That connection and that recognition won’t happen if it feels like it’s some kind of symbolic addition, something that’s been pushed into it. “

But the authenticity portrayed in films like “Luca” only comes about when people from the communities represented on the screen work behind the camera. Every week, LeBrecht hears stories from and about the disabled community that could make for engaging television and film.

“The industry needs to make the same diversity and inclusion efforts that it has made for other marginalized communities towards the disabled community,” LeBrecht said. “It’s not a wish. It’s not a charity. It’s good business. “

Categories
Business

In Antitrust Trial, Tim Cook dinner Argues Apple Doesn’t Harm App Makers

Tim Cook, who testified on Friday in a lawsuit that could undermine Apple’s efforts to stave off growing control of its power, defended his company on allegations that it harmed app makers looking to increase their profits.

Mr. Cook, who took the stand for the first time as CEO of Apple, answered friendly questions from an Apple attorney and faced targeted questions from both an opposing attorney and the federal judge who will rule the case.

The results of the study could maintain or improve Apple’s dominance in the $ 100 billion app market. Epic Games, creator of the popular game Fortnite, is suing Apple, claiming the iPhone maker created a monopoly on its App Store and is using that power to take an unfair cut from other companies that rely on the App Store to Reach customers.

An epic win would enliven a growing cartel war against Apple. Federal and state regulators are scrutinizing Apple’s control over the App Store, and the European Union recently accused Apple of violating antitrust laws over its app rules and fees. Apple is facing two more federal lawsuits over its App Store fees – one from developers and one from iPhone owners – that are seeking class action lawsuit status.

Mr. Cook’s testimony came towards the end of a three-week lawsuit in federal court in Oakland, Calif., Dealing with the performance Apple gets from its App Store and 30 percent commission on the sale of most digital goods and subscriptions.

He entered the courthouse on Friday morning from an underground parking garage rather than the main entrance, which enabled him to avoid photographers gathering in front of the building. At around 7:30 am, journalists noticed he was going through security checks and shouted questions. Mr. Cook, wearing a dark gray suit, white shirt, and gray tie, held up his hand in a peace sign.

For over an hour, an Apple attorney led Mr. Cook through complaints against Apple, allowing him to explain why Apple did business in certain ways – and why it did no harm to app developers.

Mr Cook testified that Apple faced stiff competition and said commissions Apple collected from app developers helped fund better security in the App Store. “There’s a conflict between what the developer wants and what the consumer wants,” he said. He added that Apple has cut app store fees for many developers who are much smaller than Epic.

In a cross-examination, an epic attorney targeted Mr Cook’s credibility and asked why Mr Cook said he was unaware of some of the details of Apple’s business, including the App Store profit margins, which an outside expert testified on behalf of Epic said , could be up to 80 percent.

Mr. Cook said that was wrong. He said the App Store was profitable, but Apple hadn’t tried to pinpoint exactly how profitable it was, partly because it would be difficult to structure Apple’s costs.

Epic’s attorney denied this claim, showing internal Apple documents from Mr. Cook showing that the company could calculate the profitability of the App Store. Mr. Cook countered that the documents showed incomplete figures.

Epic’s attorney then moved on to an issue affecting the lawsuit, but it seemed to illustrate Apple’s hypocrisy: The way the company operates in China undermines Apple’s public enthusiasm for consumer privacy. The New York Times reported this week that Apple had compromised its Chinese users’ data and supported the Chinese government’s censorship by proactively removing apps.

While Mr Cook said Apple must obey laws in China, Epic’s attorney noted that other companies dissatisfied with Chinese policies had left the country. “I don’t know anyone in the smartphone business who doesn’t sell to China,” replied Cook.

The most worrying moment for Mr. Cook and Apple was the end of his testimony when Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the US District Court for the Northern District of California participated in Mr. Cook’s questioning.

Throughout the trial, Judge Gonzalez Rogers posed specific questions to Apple and Epic witnesses, and her back and forth with Mr. Cook on Friday resulted in a particularly intense scrutiny of Apple’s arguments. Why couldn’t Apple allow iPhone owners to have more options to buy apps, she asked, especially if that meant lower prices for consumers?

“If you let people leak like this, we would essentially be giving up our total return on our intellectual property,” replied Mr. Cook.

The judge asked if Apple’s decision last year to reduce commission on app sales for developers making less than $ 1 million a year was aimed at distracting the review of Apple’s App Store policies. Mr Cook admitted that testing was a factor, but added that Apple primarily wanted to help small developers who were hit by a weak economy during the coronavirus pandemic.

Judge Gonzalez Rogers then launched a poll that found 39 percent of app developers were dissatisfied with Apple’s management of the App Store. “It doesn’t seem to me that you are again feeling any real pressure or competition to actually change the way you act to address developer concerns,” she said.

The judge’s biggest challenge in ruling the case may be to define the market that Epic and Apple are contending over.

Epic lawyers have argued that these are iPhone apps and that a game maker needs to walk through Apple’s “walled garden” to reach the more than one billion people who use the devices. This stifles innovation, Epic claims, and allows Apple to enforce strict rules and harm app developers by charging excessive fees. The company wants to host its own digital storefront within Apple.

Mr Cook said on Friday that “I am not a gamer,” but he argued that Epic distributes its games in a number of ways, including web browsers, game consoles and personal computers. Many of these platforms charge a commission similar to that of the App Store. If gaming is the market, Apple has argued, then there are a lot of competitors – like Microsoft, Sony, and Nintendo – and Apple cannot have a monopoly.

Judge Gonzalez Rogers expressed frustration with the market semantics. “One side will say it’s black, the other say it’s white – usually it’s somewhere in the gray,” she said last week.

At the beginning of the study, Trystan Kosmynka, Apple’s senior director, testified that the company rejected 40 percent of all app submissions in 2020. Apple cannot effectively monitor which apps get onto iPhones when Epic has its own app store. Said Kosmynka.

Epic responded with a flurry of internal Apple emails showing times when malicious apps got past Mr. Kosmynka’s team. An app released during the summer protests against Black Lives Matter was a game that allowed users to shoot cannons at protesters.

Apple tried to show why allowing an app store on an app store can be problematic. Lawyers criticized Epic’s digital business for not keeping controls tight enough, saying companies managed to use it to sell games they described as “offensive and sexualized.”

In an attempt to tie Epic to inappropriate content, Richard Doren, an Apple attorney, brought up Peely, a comic banana in Fortnite who is sometimes wearing a tuxedo and sometimes naked. Mr Doren implied that it would have been inappropriate to show Peely in federal court without a tuxedo. Matthew Weissinger, Vice President Marketing at Epic, made it clear that Peely, naked or suitable, wasn’t scandalous.

“It’s just a banana man,” he said.

The battle between the companies began in August when Epic broke Apple’s rules by bypassing Apple’s payment system in the Fortnite app. Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, and Epic immediately sued the company and launched an advertising campaign around the suit.

On the first day of the trial, Epic’s chief executive Tim Sweeney testified that his company filed a lawsuit because he wanted to show the world the consequences of Apple’s policies. Judge Gonzalez Rogers cut him off and asked if Mr. Sweeney knew of another developer lawsuit against Apple.

Mr. Sweeney said he did.

“And you just ignored that and went alone,” replied the judge.

The trial will complete on Monday, but Judge Gonzalez Rogers said a decision would likely take months. “Hopefully before August 13th,” she said. She also said her decision would likely be challenged, meaning the process could only be the first chapter of a lengthy battle.

Categories
Entertainment

Musicians Say Streaming Doesn’t Pay. Can the Trade Change?

An example of this tension is the pop duo Frenship from Los Angeles.

In 2016, the group with Brett Hite and James Sunderland had a breakout hit with “Capsize”, recorded with singer and songwriter Emily Warren. Frenship released the song independently, and it was quickly added to a prominent playlist on Spotify. Capsize hit 40 million streams in 10 weeks and raised $ 150,000 in payments, the group said.

“Spotify made our career possible for us,” Hite said in an interview.

Then the group signed with Columbia Records, which launched a radio advertising campaign centered around “Capsize”. The song failed to break the Top 40 on the Billboard Hot 100 chart, but it remained a steady streaming success, now with around 570 million clicks on Spotify. The band declined to disclose specific details of their time in Columbia – they agreed to confidentiality in their 2018 separation agreement with the label – but Hite glorified his time with the majors with an anecdote about buying a car in the months “Capsize” lifted off.

“I look at BMWs and when I break down, I leased a Honda CR-V,” he said. “I’ll let this be the tale of where our hit brought us from.” The group is now independently preparing its next release.

Columbia declined to comment.

Despite the criticism of the artists of their labels, the contracts with the big record companies have steadily developed in recent years, which benefits the performers. Joint venture deals and shorter engagements are now more common, according to music managers, lawyers, and artist managers.

And the all-important license fee is also increasing. A 2002 study by Steven S. Wildman of Michigan State University that examined hundreds of major label contracts from that time found that artists who received their first contract from a label had, on average, royalties of 15 to 16 percent were offered. Tony Harlow, the managing director of Warner Music UK, told the parliamentary committee in January that the company’s royalties to artists had “increased from 27 to 32 percent” since 2015.

Categories
Business

For the Financial system, the Current Doesn’t Matter. It’s All In regards to the Close to Future.

It is generally considered bad journalistic practice to start an article this way, but it has to be said: the new job numbers that the Department of Labor released on Friday morning don’t matter.

These numbers can sometimes be unimportant as any economic report is only part of the story and is subject to error rates and future revisions.

But in this case, it’s more than that. This job report doesn’t matter because the economy is at an important turning point. What matters is not what has happened in the last few weeks, but where things will end in a few weeks.

The report that 379,000 jobs were created in February and the unemployment rate fell to 6.2 percent is good news. It’s a better result than January and better than forecasters expected.

But the economy is still in a deep hole, with nine million fewer jobs than a year ago, or around 12 million fewer than where we would be if employment growth had continued before the pandemic last year.

Think of a simple model of today’s economy as follows: A huge, complicated assembly line was shut down for a year and is now coming back online. Different stations on the assembly line come back at different speeds. The number of end products currently rolling off the line is less important than the details of the progress (or not) all of these various stations are making towards full capacity.

In normal times, the total employment growth reported on Friday would be a blockbuster number. However, continuing to create jobs at this rate would still mean a two-year return to pre-pandemic employment levels. The question is whether job creation will accelerate in the coming months as more Americans get vaccinated and return to normal behavior, especially when it comes to travel and entertainment.

A worrying sign of the new employment figures: State and local governments appear to be cutting jobs en masse. They cut a total of 83,000 jobs, around 69,000 of them in the education sector.

Will many of these jobs return when schools are at full capacity by fall? The Senate Biden Pandemic bailout plan provides for $ 130 billion to reopen schools safely and another $ 350 billion to support broader state and local budgets. If that money proves appropriate for the job, the February downsizing could turn out to be a temporary slip up.

Updated

March 5, 2021, 7:20 p.m. ET

In February, some of the sectors most directly affected by the pandemic saw huge job gains, particularly a 355,000 increase in leisure and hospitality jobs, largely related to restaurant jobs.

That’s good news, but restaurant employment is still 16 percent below last February’s level, a two million job hole. Widespread vaccination that allows people to return to restaurants safely is the only way those jobs can return.

This week’s news that Merck will help manufacture Johnson & Johnson’s coronavirus vaccine is bigger business for unemployed waiters and line chefs than the 286,000 bars and restaurant jobs added in February.

The longer-term effects of the crisis remain bleak. The rise in employment in February was entirely due to the layoffs – the number of these temporarily unemployed workers fell by 517,000. The number of permanent job losers remained constant at an astronomical level – 2.2 million more than a year ago.

That raises questions about which jobs destroyed during the pandemic will return. Are there certain behavior patterns and business models that have disappeared forever? And what will the people who once worked in these companies do now?

That is the hardest question for the future. It’s easy to describe the way back for jobs in schools and restaurants. However, real economic health means these 2.2 million people are returning to the ranks of the workforce too, and that could take more than just a shot in the arm.

Categories
Health

Altria asks FDA to unfold the phrase that nicotine does not trigger most cancers

A Marlboro cigarette.

Daniel Acker | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Marlboro’s parent, Altria, has asked the Food and Drug Administration to help spread the word that nicotine doesn’t cause cancer.

CNBC received a copy of a letter Altria sent to the FDA on Thursday asking the agency to spread the word about nicotine as part of a proposed publicity campaign about the risks of tobacco use.

“We received the letter and we will respond directly to the company,” FDA spokeswoman Alison Hunt told CNBC in an email.

Altria was not immediately available to comment on the matter.

In the February 25 letter signed by Paige C. Magness, senior vice president of Regulatory Affairs, Altria cited government studies on misperceptions about nicotine. It was said that eliminating such misperceptions would help traditional smokers switch to non-flammable methods of using nicotine, which may be less risky than products containing smoke.

Bloomberg News first reported the letter Thursday.

While the vast majority of Altria’s revenue comes from the sale of cigarettes and cigars, the company is also involved in vaping firm Juul and the nicotine pouch brand On! Involves and markets IQOS, a smokeless tobacco product that heats tobacco instead of burning it in the United States

There are at least 60 carcinogens in cigarette smoke, but these newer products deliver nicotine without the smoke.

As the regulator of Altria, the FDA can determine what claims it can make of its products. The FDA has allowed Altria to market IQOS in a way that would reduce the exposure of users to harmful chemicals than cigarette smoke.

Nicotine is the addicting ingredient to tobacco and it can have other negative health effects. In its report, Bloomberg said studies have shown that nicotine can affect brain development and birth outcomes, and in large doses acts as an agricultural poison.

Categories
Health

‘Model would not matter. Get the primary vaccine out there,’ Dr. Vin Gupta says

The intensive care unit and the pulmonologist Dr. Vin Gupta told CNBC’s “The News with Shepard Smith” that patients should stop weighing the pros and cons of the Covid vaccine and still get the first shot in the arms as soon as possible, a new Israeli study that shows that the Pfizer vaccine will actually stop the spread of Covid.

“People say maybe I want the Pfizer vaccine instead of Johnson & Johnson or another,” said Gupta, a professor at the Department of Health Metrics and Assessment at the University of Washington, during an interview Monday evening. “That’s the wrong way to think about it. The brand here doesn’t matter. Get the first vaccine available.”

Gupta tweeted a photo of the lungs of a Covid patient who died of life support. The lungs developed holes that were once lung tissue, and Gupta said the vaccines can prevent this type of severe progression of the virus.

“This right-sided image is severe pneumonia that requires life support,” Gupta said. “All vaccines in the pipeline or approved prevent this, regardless of the variant.”

According to the Johns Hopkins University, the United States has exceeded 500,000 deaths from the coronavirus pandemic, and that’s twice as many as any other nation. In fact, the US has recorded an average of one death per minute over the past year.

President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris honored the lives lost on Monday with a moment of silence and a candle-lighting ceremony in the White House. White House press secretary Jen Psaki also ordered Biden to lower the state flags to half the staff for the next five days. The bells at Washington National Cathedral rang 500 times in memory of the Americans killed by Covid.

The grim milestone of the pandemic comes when virus numbers improve. According to Johns Hopkins, the average daily cases are 69,986, a 52% decrease in this month alone. The average daily deaths are 1,872, the lowest since December 2. Hospital admissions are down 41% this month alone, according to the Covid Tracking Project.

However, Gupta told host Shepard Smith that people shouldn’t give up their vigilance when it comes to the virus.

“I think right now we have to be very careful how we feel about this good news,” said Gupta. “We still have to be vigilant, but yeah, that’s really good news, bright at the end of the tunnel, hopefully by midsummer.”

The highly transmittable new Covid variants have surfaced in several places in the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The British variant was found in 44 states, the South African variant in 10 states and the Brazilian variant in 4 states.

Gupta noted that the US doesn’t have the sequencing technology to understand the “true spread” of the variants and is another reason for Americans to remain vigilant against the virus.