Categories
Politics

What Voters in a California Swing District Say About Afghanistan

In a time of deep division, voters polled over the weekend in a Southern California congressional district where the Democrats narrowly outperform Republicans were largely unanimous on at least one issue: After a two-decade war, President Biden was right to withdraw American troops of Afghanistan.

The bombing of Kabul airport had done little to change their minds, with the killing of 13 soldiers stunned rather than sad. Many said they were simply too overwhelmed to pay attention to another overseas crisis. “We have a lot to repair here,” said Ms. Ortiz, who described herself as politically moderate and voted for Mr. Biden.

In the midst of a still raging pandemic and economy still recovering, this is a time to focus on issues domestically and not overseas, more than a dozen Republican, Democratic and independent voters said in talks in and around Hacienda Heights, a community of 55,000 people about 20 miles east of downtown Los Angeles, where first and second generation immigrants fill the neighborhoods and malls.

Afghanistan can be ignored, they said, but the possibility that their children, who are too young to be vaccinated, cannot. Washington leaders might be concerned about the terrorism threat or America’s standing with allies, but Hacienda Heights voters said they were far more concerned about issues that affect them directly: Covid-19, homelessness and climate change , to name just a few.

They also seemed reluctant to hold Mr Biden accountable for the attacks over the past week, at least for the time being.

“If you don’t have a good choice, you still have to choose one,” said Patrick Huang, a 65-year-old independent who voted for both Republicans and Democrats. “They had a lot of time to prepare to get everyone out and they totally screwed it up. But I don’t blame President Biden for everything. It happened after many, many presidents made mistakes. “

Categories
Politics

Trump tax returns in arms of Manhattan district lawyer

Former President Donald Trump’s tax records were turned over to Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. after the Supreme Court rejected the ex-President’s recent efforts to keep the documents safe.

A Vance spokesman Danny Frost confirmed that a subpoena against Trump’s longtime accounting firm Mazars USA was passed on Monday, hours after the country’s highest court dismissed Trump’s appeal.

The subpoena requested Trump’s 2011 personal and company records, including his tax returns. Trump defied modern precedent by refusing to make his tax returns available to the public despite running two campaigns for the presidency.

A spokesman for the former president did not immediately comment on Thursday. After the court allowed the rendition, Trump promised to “keep fighting” and said Vance was pursuing a “fishing expedition.”

The long-term investigation was closely monitored. Early reports suggested that prosecutors were looking into hush money payments made on Trump’s behalf to women allegedly linked to the real estate tycoon. Trump denied the affairs.

Recent court records have revealed that Vance may be investigating Trump and his company of the same name, The Trump Organization, for possible banking and insurance fraud. Trump has repeatedly denied allegations of financial inappropriateness and accused investigators of partisan motives.

The dispute over Trump’s tax documents reached the Supreme Court twice. On both occasions the panel refused to stop the lower court’s decisions on Vance’s side. In July, Chief Justice John Roberts wrote a statement for a 7-2 court rejecting Trump’s sweeping argument that he was immune to state criminal investigations during his tenure.

“In our judicial system, the public has a right to any man’s evidence.” Since the earliest days of the Republic, “every man” has included the President of the United States, “said Roberts, who was appointed to court by then-President George W. Bush.

After this decision, Trump’s lawyers continued to fight the subpoena on the grounds that it was too broad and badly issued, but the lower courts denied these claims. In October, Trump’s attorneys again called on the Supreme Court to intervene, but the court wrote in a one-line order on Monday that it was not.

Vance’s possession of Trump’s tax records does not guarantee that the public will ever know what they contain. The recordings were obtained in connection with a grand jury investigation and New York State law requires that the grand jury proceedings be confidential. It’s likely that the public will only be able to see the records if Vance ultimately charges and includes portions of the records in billing documents.