Categories
Business

Elon Musk and Memes: A Controversy Over Giving Creators Credit score

Elon Musk – the Tesla CEO, SpaceX founder and soon-to-be Saturday Night Live host – is an open admirer of memes.

“Whoever controls the memes controls the universe,” tweeted Mr. Musk last summer. He has called the visual jokes “modern art” and shares them regularly on Twitter, where he has more than 52 million followers.

Mr. Musk doesn’t make a lot of memes himself. Instead, he finds them online and has others send them their favorites. Sometimes he republishes his favorites without naming their origins.

This practice is not uncommon. Lots of people on the internet share other people’s memes without giving credit to the creators, in part because it can be difficult to spot credit. Memes are based on reinterpretations of joke formats, and it’s not always clear where they start.

But the fact that Elon Musk frequently steals memes has essentially become a meme in itself. And it’s not always felt to be very funny.

For comedians and content creators, memes are valuable intellectual property. Nick Noerdlinger, 23, executive director of the Meme Insider website, noted that granting or denying credit has business implications. “Because the internet is so big and wide, the only thing that draws people back to someone who can ultimately make a living on the platform is credit,” he said. “In the creative economy, even without credit, the creators would not be able to make money, build a brand around them, and appeal to an audience.

In the past few years, viral meme accounts that have seen great success and monetization by republishing other developers’ work without credit or payment have met with backlash. In 2019, a conversation about this issue was sparked by a campaign against an Instagram account operated by Jerry Media. It helped change the standards that brands and top influencers adhere to today.

Quinn Heraty, a lawyer specializing in intellectual property law, found that rapper Ludacris was sued by the LittleThings website in 2017 for posting an illustration from the website on his Instagram without acknowledging it. (The parties have reached an agreement.)

Ms. Heraty said that without “transformative use” there could be a case for copyright infringement. “If he brushes the picture off the picture and publishes it without reference to the original creator, it shows willpower,” she said of Mr. Musk.

Generally, when a brand uses a meme for marketing purposes, it asks permission to share the image and credits the owner. In many cases, the brand also pays off. One exception seems to be Mr Musk, who is both a successful businessman and a freewheeling personal brand.

“It’s very difficult to talk about something like this without looking like you’re crazy about it,” said Patrick Monahan, 37, a comedian and podcast host whose meme was shared by Mr. Musk without appreciation. “Ultimately, this doesn’t steal a script or an entire song, but it’s the same spiritually. It’s just not cool. “

It may speak more to the simple fact that Mr Musk, who was briefly the richest man in the world according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index this year, has used Twitter to bolster his personality (and promote cryptocurrencies and stocks, including his own ).

Jamie Trufin, who runs a meme account called @DogeCoinDaddy, said he was disappointed when Mr. Musk posted one of his Doge memes with no credit in March.

“It kills your mood,” said the 24-year-old Trufin. “You work so hard making all of these memes. I could have got a few hundred followers from it, and it would have made the community fatter and happier. He got us all excited about Dogecoin, but he tore down meme pages and did them no credit which kills the fun. “(The price of Dogecoin, a cryptocurrency, has continued to rise, thanks in part to tweets from Mr. Musk.)

In January, Mr. Musk posted a meme about web domains created by Ben Howdle, 31, who has a tech meme account. Mr. Howdle was puzzled as to why someone with such great resources would share someone else’s work with no credit. “You would think if you were the richest person in the world, you wouldn’t have to massage your ego,” he said. (For what it’s worth, Mr. Musk is only the second richest now.)

Mr. Musk has been doing this for a while. In April 2020, he shared a meme created by a comedian with a photo of their dog, which some say Mr. Musk tried to pass it off as his own.

After being criticized in 2019 for sharing artwork on Twitter without credit, Mr. Musk first tweeted, “Always credit everyone.” Then he reversed course: “Nobody should ever be credited,” he wrote, suggesting that “any fool can find out in seconds who the artist was”.

Miles Klee, a 36-year-old Los Angeles writer, heard from a friend that a meme he made in April about vaccinated people enjoying a promiscuous summer had been republished by Mr. Musk. “Someone in my group chat said, ‘LOL, did everyone see Elon steal a meme that Miles made?'”

Mr. Klee is not angry with Mr. Musk, but found the behavior repulsive. “Of course he has his henchmen who are ready to defend what he does,” said Mr. Klee, “but for everyone else who is normal and has been on the Internet for a long time, it’s like:” Yes, that’s a wack Move.'”

Chas Steinbrugge, 19, a freshman who runs the @Trigomemetry meme account, is also the creator of Meme Citations, a website that shares the origins of memes in the Modern Language Association format.

“Personalities like Elon Musk don’t give credit, it hurts the creators,” he said. “He could create a situation where he encourages young meme creators and contributes to the community by tagging whoever created them or adding watermarks.”

Several people whose content was published by Mr. Musk have since asked for payment, be it in dollars, Teslas or Bitcoin. (Mr. Monahan said he was willing to accept “only $ 80,000”.)

Mr. Klee took a newer approach. “Can someone help me create and sell an NFT of a screenshot of Elon Musk posting a horny vaccine meme that I made?” he asked his followers on Twitter. Someone turned the tweet into an NFT that Mr. Klee could sell for $ 1,000 in Ethereum, a cryptocurrency.

Mr Musk, who received a comment on this article via email, responded with two uncredited memes:

Categories
Health

JAMA Editor Positioned on Go away Following Racial Controversy

Following controversial comments from a deputy editor at JAMA on racism in medicine, the editor-in-chief of the renowned medical journal was put on administrative leave on Thursday.

An American Medical Association committee that oversees the journal said Dr. Howard Bauchner will be replaced by an interim editor pending the results of an independent investigation. The decision was announced in an email to employees on Thursday.

JAMA is one of the world’s leading medical journals, publishing research that shapes the scientific agenda and public order around the globe. The controversy began when Dr. Ed Livingston, an associate editor, said on a February 24 podcast that structural racism no longer exists in the United States.

“Structural racism is an unfortunate term,” said Dr. Livingston who is white. “Personally, I think it will be helpful to take racism out of the conversation. A lot of people like me are offended that we are kind of racist. “

The podcast was promoted with a tweet from the magazine that said, “No doctor is racist. So how can there be structural racism in healthcare?” The response to both was quick and furious, causing the diary to shut down the podcast and delete the tweet.

A week later, Dr. Bauchner on the controversy. “The comments made on the podcast were inaccurate, offensive, hurtful and contrary to JAMA’s standards,” said Dr. Bauchner in a statement. “We’re making changes to fix these types of errors and prevent them from happening again.”

Dr. Livingston later resigned. On Thursday evening, JAMA officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Many in the medical community said that the diary did not go far enough and that events provided an opportunity to make more systemic changes. In an email to the AMA leaders, a group of doctors called for “a careful investigation into the editorial and board of JAMA, including the removal of Dr. Howard Bauchner.”

The authors also initiated a petition, which has now been signed by nearly 7,000 people, calling on the journal to contact Dr. Hold Bauchner accountable and review and restructure the editorial process.

“It’s not only that this podcast is problematic – it’s also that there is a long and documented history of institutional racism at JAMA,” said Dr. Brittani James, a black doctor who practiced on the south side of Chicago and helped start the petition.

“This podcast should never have happened,” said Dr. Uché Blackstock, an ambulance doctor in New York. “That tweet should never have happened. The fact that podcasts were conceived, recorded, and published was incomprehensible. “

“I think it’s caused an incalculable amount of pain and trauma to black doctors and patients,” she said. “And I think it will be a long time before the diary heals this pain.”

More recently, other prominent journals have faced their role in perpetuating racism in medicine. In January, Health Editor-in-Chief Alan Weil admitted that “the magazine’s employees and executives are overwhelmingly white and economically privileged,” and committed to reviewing the editorial process.

The AMA’s email to staff promised that the investigation would look into “how the podcast and related tweet were developed, reviewed and ultimately published,” and that the association had hired independent investigators to ensure objectivity.

The email did not include a deadline for completing the investigation.

Categories
Business

Atlanta Dream offered to Larry Gottesdiener following Kelly Loeffler controversy

Renee Montgomery of the Atlanta Dream.

Adam Pantozzi | National Basketball Association | Getty Images

Kelly Loeffler is no longer a WNBA team owner.

The Women’s National Basketball Association announced Friday that it and the NBA Board of Governors unanimously approved the sale of the Atlanta Dream to Larry Gottesdiener, chairman of Northland real estate company.

Other team investors include former dream star Renee Montgomery and Northland President and COO Suzanne Abair.

“With the unanimous WNBA and NBA votes, today marks a fresh start for the Atlanta Dream organization and we are delighted to welcome Larry Gottesdiener and Suzanne Abair to the WNBA,” said WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert in a statement . “I admire her passion for women’s basketball, but most of all I am impressed by her values.”

In a media call about the sale, Engelbert said Montgomery was a huge “win” for the new owners. She described Montgomery as “a pioneer who made a huge impact both in the game and beyond”. Montgomery, 34, played 11 years in the WNBA, including two seasons with the franchise (2018-19) before retiring on February 9.

“I want to keep growing and we will continue to build momentum in Atlanta for Atlanta Dream,” said Montgomery on the conference call.

Conditions of sale were not provided.

However, sports bankers paint a picture of the WNBA team ratings and estimate that a larger market team – the New York Liberty – will sell in the $ 10 million to $ 14 million range in 2019. Brooklyn Nets owner Joe Tsai now owns the team.

When asked by CNBC to confirm whether sales fell within the price range, Engelbert said the terms are “confidential,” but added, “We look forward to continuing the transformation to include all elements of the WNBA for us all Our franchises can offer added value and a valuation for the future. “

Atlanta owner Kelly Loeffler (right) speaks to Dream General Manager Chris Sienko (left) during the WNBA game between the Las Vegas Aces and the Atlanta Dream on September 5, 2019 at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, GA.

Rich von Biberstein | Icon Sportswire | Getty Images

Loeffler, the former U.S. Senator from Georgia, lost her Senate seat in the Georgia runoff election in January. It made headlines in July 2020 after speaking out against support for the black social justice team after multiple high profile shootings involving police.

The Dream wore shirts that supported the Black Lives Matter movement and commemorated Breonna Taylor, who was killed by police in Louisville, Kentucky last March. Loeffler wrote to Engelbert to oppose the movement’s support and to express their support for players wearing the American flag on shirts.

After the letter, Dream players used their platform to support their opponent, now US Senator Raphael Warnock. The players wore “Vote Warnock” shirts, which reportedly raised over $ 236,000 for his campaign.

On January 19, reports surfaced that a sale of the dream had been completed. In 2011 Loeffler and Mary Brock took over the majority stake in Dream after the owner at the time, Kathy Betty, left the group of owners in 2011.

“That is now a thing of the past, we look to the future and a new beginning for the dream players and, to be honest, for the WNBA,” said Engelbert.

The Dream ended 7-15 last season and failed to make the playoffs. The team will select third place in the 2021 WNBA draft.

“It is a privilege to join a team of inspiring women who seek excellence on the pitch and justice off the pitch,” said Gottesdiener. “I would like to thank Commissioner Engelbert, Commissioner (Adam) Silver, and the boards of governors of the WNBA and the NBA for the opportunity.”