Categories
World News

Taliban content material banned on Fb, Instagram, WhatsApp

Taliban fighters with a vehicle on a highway in Afghanistan.

Saibal Das | The India Today Group | Getty Images

Facebook and TikTok said Tuesday that they will not lift the ban on content promoting the Taliban after the group takes control of Afghanistan.

The social media giants told CNBC that they consider the Afghan group, which has been using social media platforms to get their messages across for years, as a terrorist organization.

Facebook said it has a dedicated team of content moderators that monitor and remove posts, pictures, videos and other Taliban-related content. It is unclear how many people are on the team.

Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid criticized Facebook for censorship at a public press conference in the capital Kabul on Tuesday, claiming the group’s freedom of expression was stifled by the tech giant’s ban. Facebook reportedly removed several user accounts linked to Mujahid this week after they were reported to the company by New York Times journalists.

Afghanistan fell victim to the Islamic militant group over the weekend when they captured Kabul, including the presidential palace. After President Joe Biden’s decision in April to withdraw US troops from Afghanistan, the Taliban made breathtaking strides on the battlefield – and almost the entire nation is now under insurgent control.

A Facebook spokesman told CNBC: “The Taliban are sanctioned as a terrorist organization under US law and we have banned them from our services under our dangerous organization policy.”

The Taliban have been banned from Facebook for several years, the spokesman said.

Facebook said it means removing accounts held by or on behalf of the Taliban, as well as those that praise, support and represent them.

“We also have a dedicated team of Afghanistan experts who are native Dari and Pashto speakers and who know the local context and who help us to identify and raise awareness of emerging problems on the platform,” said the Facebook spokesman.

Facebook said it doesn’t decide whether to recognize national governments. Instead, it follows the “authority of the international community”.

TikTok declined to issue a statement, but told CNBC that it has classified the Taliban as a terrorist organization and is continuing to remove content that it praises, glorifies, or endorses.

WhatsApp dilemma?

The ban on Facebook also applies to Instagram and WhatsApp, but reports suggest that the Taliban are still using WhatsApp to communicate. The chat platform is end-to-end encrypted, which means that Facebook cannot see what people are sharing on it.

“As a private messaging service, however, we do not have access to the content of people’s personal chats.

A Facebook spokesperson told CNBC that WhatsApp uses AI software to analyze unencrypted group information including names, profile photos and group descriptions to meet legal obligations.

Alphabet-owned YouTube said its community guidelines apply to everyone equally and that it enforces its guidelines on the content and the context in which it is presented. The company said it allows content that has sufficient educational, documentary, scientific, and artistic context.

“The situation in Afghanistan is developing rapidly,” a Twitter spokesman told CNBC. “We’re also watching people across the country use Twitter to seek help and advice. Twitter’s top priority is keeping people safe and we’re staying vigilant.”

“We will continue to proactively enforce our rules and review content that could violate Twitter rules, particularly the glorification of violence, platform manipulation and spam,” added the spokesman.

Rasmus Nielsen, professor of political communication at Oxford University, told CNBC it was important that social media companies act consistently in crisis situations.

“Every time someone is banned, there is a risk that they are only using the platform for legitimate purposes,” he said.

“Given the disagreement over terms such as ‘terrorism’ and who can identify individuals and groups as such, civil society groups and activists will want clarity on the nature and extent of working with governments on these decisions,” added Nielsen. “And many users will be reassured that any technology used for enforcement will protect their privacy.”

Categories
Business

Fb and Information Corp Strike Pay Deal for Australian Content material

MELBOURNE, Australia – Facebook agreed to pay Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp for its journalistic content in Australia a month after the social media platform temporarily blocked news links within the country because legislation pushed digital giants to compensate publishers.

The multi-year deal, announced on Tuesday, includes news content from major conservative Murdoch media outlets such as The Australian, a national newspaper and news site news.com.au, as well as other publications from major cities, regions and communities.

It comes a month after Google announced its own three-year global agreement with News Corp to pay for the publisher’s news content, and under heavy criticism Facebook stepped back from its drastic move to block news links from being shared or viewed in Australia.

Few details were released, including how much Facebook News Corp pays for content.

In a statement on Tuesday, News Corp. CEO Robert Thomson said the agreement, which he called a “milestone”, “would have a material and significant impact on our Australian news business.”

News Corp leaders, Thomson added, “had a global debate” as the rise of the digital giants impoverished the news industry. With the deal, Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook, and his team would have contributed to “creating a future for journalism that was under extreme stress”.

However, critics said the deal did little to guarantee the kind of public interest journalism touted by the Australian government when it proposed legislation that was passed last month.

“There are no guarantees that the public will benefit,” said Tanya Notley, a communications professor at Western Sydney University, who noted that the first major news companies to do business with Facebook were conservative and aligned with the current government were.

Others said it further emphasized the excessive power of social media companies to control news and public information. “They’re the keepers of the news for public consumption,” said Marc Cheong, a researcher on digital ethics at the University of Melbourne.

In a statement, Facebook said the agreements would help people gain access to news articles and breaking news videos from a network of national, urban, rural and suburban newsrooms.

“We are determined to bring Facebook news to Australia,” said Andrew Hunter, director of Facebook partnerships in Australia and New Zealand.

That was a distinctly different tone from what the tech giant struck in February when Facebook blocked messages in Australia.

At the time, William Easton, executive director of Facebook Australia and New Zealand, said of the draft Australian law: “The proposed law fundamentally misunderstands the relationship between our platform and publishers who use it to share news content.”

While the Australian government has pointed to the consolidation of digital advertising spending in companies like Google and Facebook, the tech giants say they are benefiting news companies by driving traffic to their websites.

Facebook has also announced tentative collective bargaining agreements with independent news organizations such as Private Media, Schwartz Media and Solstice Media. So far, however, only agreements with News Corp and Seven West Media, another large conservative news company, have been cemented.

Sky News Australia, also owned by Mr. Murdoch, extended an existing agreement with Facebook.

Categories
World News

Russia slows down Twitter to guard residents from unlawful content material

Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Alexei Nikolsky | Reuters

Russia has announced that it will impose restrictions on the social media platform Twitter for not removing illegal content from its platform.

The Federal Service for Communications, Information Technology and Mass Communication, also known as Roskomnadzor, announced on Wednesday that it was slowing the speed of Twitter.

The communications guard said he was taking measures to ensure the safety of Russian citizens and could completely block the service if Twitter does not respond appropriately.

Twitter did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

According to Roskomnadzor, speeds will be reduced on all mobile devices and 50% of all non-mobile devices such as computers, it said in a statement on its website.

Roskomnadzor accused Twitter of not removing content that encourages minors to commit suicide, as well as child pornography and drug use.

The regulator asked Twitter to remove links and posts more than 28,000 times between 2017 and March 2021. Other social networks have been more cooperative than Twitter to remove content that encourages minors to commit suicide.

Russia’s move to curb Twitter follows similar actions by governments in Turkey and India, which have also threatened jail sentences for platform managers.

Matt Navara, a social media advisor, told CNBC that the “threat of restricting, blocking, or banning social media platforms appears to be a growing trend for countries notorious for tougher, less democratic regimes” .

Social media platforms are in a constant battle to keep inappropriate content off their platforms. Facebook, TikTok, YouTube, and Twitter all use a combination of software and human content moderators to monitor what’s being shared on their platforms, but none of them have really mastered content moderation.

One of the most notorious examples of recent times was the Christchurch shooter who broadcast his mass murder live on Facebook and other platforms. The video was quickly cloned and re-shared by other users, faster than the content moderators could remove, and it remained on Facebook for a few weeks after the attack.