Categories
Business

Weekly Jobless Claims Report Will Give Newest Indication of Restoration: Reside Updates

Here’s what you need to know:

Credit…Toby Melville/Reuters

The start of 2021 has been rocky for Britain. Its exit from the European Union unleashed a colossal amount of red tape that has left some industries desperate for help, and the country is under yet another lockdown because of a fast-spreading strain of the coronavirus.

But there has been a glimmer of hope. More than four million people in Britain have been partially vaccinated against the coronavirus, a promising pace of inoculation.

Investors looking to ride a wave of optimism about a vaccine rollout have turned to Britain’s stock market, which has posted a strong start to the year, jumping more than 6 percent in the first week.

Overall, in the first two and a half weeks of January, the FTSE 100, Britain’s benchmark stock index of large companies, gained 4.3 percent — outstripping the S&P 500 index, which rose 2.6 percent, and the Stoxx Europe 600 index, which was up 3 percent. Even when the gains are converted to U.S. dollars, the FTSE 100 still has a clear lead.

Beyond the vaccine rollout helping to ensure an economic rebound, another factor is drawing investors: the relative cheapness of British stocks.

Britain’s FTSE 100 index is benefiting from an investment strategy in which traders buy so-called value stocks. These are companies that are perceived to be trading below their true value because their business has been disrupted by a recession, especially in the financial and energy sectors, and the FTSE 100 has a large share of these stocks.

Analysts at Citigroup have ordained Britain’s stock market their “favorite” value trade.

“I would emphasize the very much unloved and horrible dreadful U.K. market might be worth a look this year,” Robert Buckland, a Citigroup equity strategist, said in a presentation last week. “We all know it’s been a place to avoid for many, many years.”

The British stock market has been a laggard for years.

Once converted into dollars, the annual returns of the FTSE 100 have been the worst of the three indexes for the past nine years.

Why are investors betting on a turnaround now? For one, many of them are ready for a bargain. The equity bull market has been dominated by shares of American tech companies that are expensive, which makes some investors nervous about how much they can keep rising. Cheap stocks in industries that tend to do well during economic boom times are offering an alternative.

And then there is Britain’s free-trade deal with the European Union. Some investors have put aside whether it’s a good or bad deal in its detail, in favor of relief that an agreement was reached in late December.

The deal “reduced that overhang people had of uncertainty,” said Caroline Simmons, the U.K. chief investment officer at UBS Global Wealth Management.

Waiting for coronavirus tests in San Bernardino, Calif. A surge in the virus and the slow rollout of vaccinations have set back recovery hopes.Credit…Alex Welsh for The New York Times

The new Biden administration will get its first dose of economic reality Thursday morning when the Labor Department reports the latest weekly data on initial jobless claims.

Last week, the government reported a surge in demand for unemployment benefits, with more than one million new claims, as pandemic-related restrictions and lockdowns took a fierce toll on employment.

The virus has hardly abated since then, with the death toll topping 400,000 in the United States, and few economists expect any significant letup in layoffs. Although job losses have been concentrated in service industries like restaurants and leisure and entertainment, the broader economy has also shown signs of a slowdown recently.

“I think it’s going to be another bad number, but some of what we saw last week was catch-up after the holidays,” said Diane Swonk, chief economist at the accounting firm Grant Thornton in Chicago. “I think we will be able to see Thursday how much was catch-up and how much was deteriorating economic conditions.”

The beginning of vaccinations in December provided optimism about a quick turnaround, but the slow rollout in many parts of the country has set back those hopes. On the other hand, the passage of a $900 billion relief package late last year and the prospect of more aid under the Biden administration have allayed fears of a double-dip recession.

An additional $300 a week in supplemental unemployment benefits may encourage more people to file for benefits, said Carl Tannenbaum, chief economist at Northern Trust in Chicago. The increased assistance was part of the new stimulus effort.

Over all, the best bet for the economy is more vaccinations, Mr. Tannenbaum said.

“There is no better economic stimulus than a successful vaccine rollout,” he said. “It will reduce the risk of human interaction and provide a basis on which different types of businesses can open more durably.”

Windmills made by Vestas on the Danish coastline. Shares in renewable energy companies have risen this week as President Biden has recommitted the United States to the Paris climate agreement. Credit…Charlotte de la Fuente for The New York Times

  • Stocks on Wall Street were set to open higher on Thursday after the S&P 500 index closed at a record high after President Biden was sworn in the previous day.

  • The benchmark U.S. index was heading for a 0.2 percent increase as investors await the latest data on weekly unemployment claims. It will give the new Biden administration its first signal of how the American labor market is responding to new fiscal stimulus as the pandemic rages on. Last week, the number of claims jumped, though some of that was attributed to a catch up in the data from the holiday period.

  • European stocks were mostly higher as traders anticipated more U.S. fiscal stimulus. The Stoxx Europe 600 index rose 0.4 percent, reaching an 11-month high. Most markets in Asia closed higher.

  • Renewable energy stocks extended gains this week after Mr. Biden recommitted the United States to the Paris climate agreement. Shares in Orsted and Vestas, two Danish wind energy companies, are up nearly 6 percent and 8 percent this week. Siemens Gamesa, a Spanish subsidiary of Siemens Energy that makes wind turbines, rose more than 3 percent on Thursday. Shares in First Solar, an American company, were up 2.8 percent in premarket trading.

  • Shares in the Canadian company TC Energy fell 1.2 percent on Wednesday, after it said it would stop work on the Keystone XL oil pipeline. Later in the day, Mr. Biden rescinded the company’s construction permit.

  • Oil prices declined on Thursday. Futures of West Texas Intermediate fell 0.6 percent to just under $53 a barrel.

  • The euro rose 0.3 percent against the U.S. dollar before the European Central Bank announces its latest policy decision, though traders were not expecting a change from the current stance of negative interest rates and asset buying.

  • The pound rose 0.6 percent against the U.S. dollar and was stronger against most major peers after the Bank of England governor struck a cautious tone about the use of negative interest rates, diminishing some expectations in the market that the tool could be used soon. The central bank governor, Andrew Bailey, said that he expected the British economy to experience a “pronounced recovery” as the vaccination program is rolled out.

To help the White House with its goal of vaccinating 100 million people in its first 100 days, Amazon offered to vaccinate a large share of its workers.Credit…Johannes Eisele/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

On President Biden’s first day in office, the head of Amazon’s consumer business, Dave Clark, sent a letter to the White House with an offer to help achieve the goal of vaccinating 100 million people in the administration’s first 100 days. By way of assistance, the retailer offered to vaccinate a large share of its workers.

The e-commerce giant has made similar offers to state governments, including Tennessee and Washington, although Amazon was not among the companies Gov. Jay Inslee of Washington announced as partners in its vaccination plan this week.

Those earlier letters to governors were signed by Brian Huseman, who runs Amazon’s U.S. lobbying team, which has been seeking permission from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to vaccinate “essential” workers at the company’s warehouses, data centers and Whole Foods “at the earliest appropriate time.”

The company has hired a health care provider to help administer the vaccine to employees, it said in the letters.

This suggests that public-private partnerships to distribute vaccines may come with perks for the companies taking part, the DealBook newsletter notes, potentially giving companies leverage to push employees up the line in priorities set by states. Several states are struggling to roll out vaccines as fast as they’d like because of issues with funding, staffing and logistics. In his letter to Mr. Biden, Mr. Clark said that Amazon could help with “operations, information technology and communications capabilities,” though he didn’t specify what that would entail.

Already oil companies have found roughly 10 billion barrels of probable recoverable reserves of oil and gas off the coast of neighboring Guyana.Credit…Adriana Loureiro Fernandez for The New York Times

Suriname, Guyana and Brazil are the new areas of focus for oil companies, attracting more new investment than the Gulf of Mexico and other more established oil fields. They are helping to keep global oil prices relatively low, undermining efforts by Russia and its allies in the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, like Saudi Arabia, to manage global supply and push up prices.

The recent pickup in interest in Guyana and Suriname is somewhat surprising because their promise as oil producers has often come up empty, reports The New York Times’s Clifford Krauss. Companies drilled more than 100 unsuccessful wells there, mostly in shallow waters, from 1950 to 2014. But after rich fields were found in the deep waters off Brazil, Exxon Mobil and other companies returned to take another look. Exxon struck a gusher in Guyanese waters in 2015, opening the current flurry of exploration.

In Guyana, oil companies have found more than 10 billion barrels of probable reserves of accessible oil and gas offshore, according to IHS Markit, the energy consulting firm. Production began in 2019 and is ramping up quickly. Guyana already accounts for one of the top 50 oil basins worldwide, according to consultants.

Suriname has at least three billion to four billion barrels of reserves, energy experts said, or up to half the new oil and gas discovered around the world last year.

Oil companies say they can make money in Suriname with oil prices as low as $30 to $40 a barrel because of lower costs. That is roughly equivalent to the threshold in Guyana and well below today’s oil price. It is also below break-even levels in many places, including some U.S. shale fields, where costs usually add up to nearly $50 a barrel.

The European Central Bank left its stimulus measures intact Thursday, as expected, as it waited to see whether measures announced in December would be enough to limit economic damage from the pandemic.

Following a meeting of its governing council, the bank reiterated its intent to pump as much as 1.9 trillion newly created euros, or $2.3 trillion, into bond markets as part of a “pandemic emergency” program intended to keep market interest rates low.

The bond purchases will continue at least until March 2022 and longer if necessary, the bank said.

As expected, the central bank also said that it would maintain a program that effectively pays banks to lend money to businesses and consumers.

The European economy continues to suffer from the burden of extended lockdowns, but analysts had not expected the central bank to take further action Thursday after expanding programs intended to encourage banks to lend and hold down market interest rates.

Ramp service employees unload cargo from a United Airlines plane O’Hare International Airport in Chicago in December.Credit…Sebastian Hidalgo for The New York Times

United Airlines lost $1.9 billion in the fourth quarter, bringing its total losses for 2020 to just over $7 billion, its worst year since merging with Continental Airlines a decade ago. Despite that terrible loss, the airline said it expects 2021 to be a “transition year” as it prepares for a recovery from the coronavirus pandemic.

“The truth is that Covid-19 has changed United Airlines forever,” the company’s chief executive, Scott Kirby, said in a statement. “The passion, teamwork and perseverance that the United team showed in 2020 is exactly what will help us build a new United Airlines that’s better, stronger and more profitable than ever.”

The airline reported about $3.4 billion in operating revenue in the final three months of last year, down more than two-thirds from the same period in 2019. It ended the year with access to nearly $20 billion in cash or cash-equivalent funds, not including federal stimulus loans.

Delta Air Lines last week reported a $12.4 billion loss in 2020, capping what its chief executive called the “toughest year in Delta’s history.”

In anticipation of a recovery, United has resumed major maintenance and engine overhauls so that planes sidelined by weak demand will be ready as more people start flying again, it said.

But that recovery is unlikely to arrive for quite some time. United said it expects to bring in about a third as much operating revenue in the first quarter of this year as it did during the same three months in 2019. Most analysts believe the airline industry will not fully recover from the pandemic for several years.

Categories
Politics

Georgia election official disputes Trump claims about Biden win

Gabriel Sterling, manager for the implementation of the voting system in the Georgian Foreign Minister’s office, speaks at a press conference at the State Capitol in Atlanta, Georgia on January 4, 2021.

Facebook Facebook Logo Log in to Facebook to connect with Mike Segar Reuters

President Donald Trump made a number of “demonstrably false” claims during his controversial phone call to pressure the Georgian Foreign Secretary to reverse President-elect Joe Biden’s victory there, a senior election official said Monday.

Gabriel Sterling, Georgia’s implementation manager for the voting system, point by point rejected Trump’s claims at a press conference two days after Trump relied on Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger during an unprecedented hour-long phone call to “find” the president has enough votes to win Biden to beat.

During that call, recorded by officials in Raffensperger’s office, Trump made a series of allegations of alleged voting irregularities in the Georgian presidential election that resulted in Biden’s unjust victory.

The president and his allies elsewhere have made similar allegations relating to offenders, minors and dead people who allegedly cast ballots.

“The reason I have to be here today is because there are people in positions of authority and respect who have said their votes don’t count, and that’s not true,” Sterling said.

“And I’ll do it again, and I’ll go through all of this, ‘Anti-Disinformation Monday’.”

Standing next to a chart that read “Claim vs. Fact” with two lines under each of these words, Sterling said, “This is all easily and demonstrably wrong.”

“However, the president remains in place, undermining the confidence of Georgians in the electoral system, especially Georgian Republican in this case,” he said.

Sterling also said Trump campaign lawyers “deliberately misled” the public by claiming that a videotape showed fraudulent votes given to Biden during an election count.

Sterling suggested that Trump’s allegations could hurt Republican incumbents David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler in their runoff elections Tuesday for Georgia’s Senate seats, where they face major challenges from Democrats Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, respectively.

There are concerns among GOP leaders that Trump’s allegations of widespread electoral fraud in Georgia and Perdue and Loeffler’s support for the president’s rhetoric could dampen turnout by Republican voters.

Sterling urged voters to register for Tuesday’s election race even if they had concerns about the integrity of the elections.

“I’m not admitting that there was massive electoral fraud because there wasn’t. But if you believe in your heart, the best you can do is to stand out and vote and make it harder to steal,” said he.

Sterling seemed upset as he quickly ran over claims made by Trump and his allies.

“I’ll admit after listening to the audio from [Trump’s] Phone call … I wanted to scream, well, I screamed at the computer and I screamed and talked about it in my car, on the radio, because this was exposed, “Sterling said.

Referring to the nearby chart and Trump’s claims, Sterling said, “Nobody changes parts or parts of Dominion voting machines.”

“That said, that’s – I don’t even know what that means. That’s not a real thing,” added Sterling.

“It’s not shredded. It’s not real.”

Trump’s call to Raffensperger sparked speculation that the president could face criminal prosecution for attempting to influence a state official to change the results of an election.

When asked whether the undersecretary, who did not appear at the press conference, considered asking Georgia’s attorney general or a local district attorney to investigate Trump over the call, Sterling said, “I don’t know.”

“I’m going to leave other people to make the decision,” Sterling said when asked if the call was an attack on democracy. “Personally, I found it to be something that was abnormal and out of place, and no one I know who would be president would do that to a secretary of state.”

“Trump probably had eight to 10 points [during the call]”Every one of his numbers was wrong,” Raffensperger said later Monday during a controversial interview with Fox News. “Our numbers will be confirmed in court.” Your numbers won’t be. “

Congress will meet on Wednesday to confirm Biden’s victory in the electoral college. A planned effort by a number of GOP senators and members of the House of Representatives to question the results of several battlefield states won by Biden is likely to fail.

Categories
Business

Unemployment Claims Stay Excessive as Thousands and thousands Nonetheless Wrestle to Discover Work

For many people, the economy will not improve noticeably for at least a few months. Ms Swonk expects attitudes to remain unchanged or decrease in December compared to November.

Updated

Jan. 3, 2021, 1:23 AM ET

“The entire labor market loses momentum at a critical point when cases rise,” she said.

Seasonally adjusted, the number of new government claims was 787,000, down from 806,000 the previous week.

The second stimulus

Answers to your questions about the stimulus calculation

Updated December 30, 2020

The economic aid package will issue payments of $ 600 and will distribute federal unemployment benefits of $ 300 for a minimum of 10 weeks. Find out more about the measure and what’s in it for you. For more information on how to get help, please visit our hub.

    • Do I get another incentive payment? Individual adults with adjusted gross income on their 2019 tax return of up to $ 75,000 per year will receive a payment of $ 600, and a couple (or someone whose spouse died in 2020) who earns up to $ 150,000 per year receives twice this amount. There is also a payment of $ 600 for each child for families who meet these income requirements. Individuals filing taxes with head of household status and earning up to $ 112,500 will also receive $ 600 plus the additional amount for children. People with incomes just above this level will receive a partial payment that decreases by $ 5 for every $ 100 of income.
    • When could my payment arrive? The finance department said on December 29 that it had started making direct deposits and would be mailing checks the next day. However, it will take a while for everyone to receive their money.
    • Does the agreement concern unemployment insurance? Legislators agreed to extend the length of time people can receive unemployment benefits and restart an additional federal benefit that is on top of the usual state benefits. But instead of $ 600 a week it would be $ 300. That will last until March 14th.
    • I am behind on my rent or expect to be soon. Do I get relief? The deal calls for $ 25 billion to be distributed by state and local governments to help backward tenants. In order to receive support, households must meet various conditions: the household income (for 2020) must not exceed 80 percent of the area median income; At least one household member must be at risk of homelessness or residential instability. and individuals must be eligible for unemployment benefits or face direct or indirect financial difficulties due to the pandemic. The agreement states that priority will be given to support for lower-income families who have been unemployed for three months or more.

Tighter state and local restrictions on restaurants and other businesses will weigh heavily on the labor market in the coming weeks, said Scott Anderson, chief economist at Bank of the West in San Francisco.

Mr. Anderson believes the monthly employment report will show the unemployment rate rose from 6.7 percent in November to 6.9 percent in December. The unemployment rate has fallen sharply from its high of 14.7 percent in April, but hiring has slowed as the economy has stalled in recent months.

The economy may have only created about 20,000 jobs in December, said Rubeela Farooqi, US chief economist at High Frequency Economics. That would mean a “huge slowdown from last month,” she added, as the wage bill rose 245,000.

Additionally, the pace of layoffs has remained high as industries like hospitality, travel, and entertainment struggle with the pandemic keeping many people at home, even in states and cities that haven’t placed many restrictions on businesses. In contrast, many employees who were able to work remotely emerged relatively unscathed from the economic turmoil.

The introduction of vaccines is a bright spot, as are positive economic signs such as rising stock prices and a booming real estate market. But it will be months before enough Americans can be vaccinated so that people can go to restaurants, events, and movie theaters without fear of infection.

Categories
World News

Weekly jobless claims fall for a second straight week

The number of people applying for unemployment benefits for the first time fell unexpectedly last week, marking its second consecutive decline.

Initial jobless claims fell by 19,000 to 787,000 in the week ended December 26, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Dow Jones expected initial jobless claims to rise to 828,000. The previous week’s total for initial applications has been revised up by 3,000 to 806,000.

Ongoing entitlements, which include those who have received unemployment benefits for at least two weeks, decreased by 103,000 to 5.219 million in the week of December 19. The data on ongoing claims is one week behind the original claims figures.

The number of people receiving benefits in all unemployment programs decreased by 800,000 to 19.6 million.

The four-week moving average for first-time registrants rose 17,750 to 836,750, indicating that the job market is still under pressure as the coronavirus pandemic rages on.

“There’s no real improvement in the data,” John Ryding, business advisor at Brean Capital, told CNBC’s Squawk Box. “What we are seeing is a very difficult time in the economy with the virus uptake we saw and the slow adoption of vaccination.”

The United States has at least 181,998 new coronavirus cases every day based on a 7-day average calculated by CNBC using data from Johns Hopkins University. The hospital stay rate in Covid has also increased, exceeding 125,000 for the first time.

“There is good news ahead of us, but you can’t see it in these numbers,” said Ryding. “This good news will come when there is enough [vaccine] Shots in people’s arms and we’re approaching something like herd immunity. Unfortunately that won’t be until summer. “

U.S. lawmakers recently approved a $ 900 billion Covid stimulus package that includes direct payments of $ 600 to most Americans. This week the House passed a measure to raise those payments to $ 2,000, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has blocked them.

Subscribe to CNBC PRO for exclusive insights and analysis as well as live business day programs from around the world.

Categories
Business

‘I Am So Misplaced’: Black Owners Wrestle to Get Insurers to Pay Claims

When a pipe burst and their house flooded in 2018, Deonne Burgess knew the cleanup was going to be chaotic. What she wasn’t expecting was a review by State Farm, her home insurer.

A State Farm claims adjuster tried to remove as many items as possible from a repair list of her home in Inglewood, a mostly black neighborhood in Los Angeles, Ms. Burgess said. The adjuster argued that State Farm didn’t have to pay to replace a door that was so damaged by the flood that it was no longer closed.

Ms. Burgess, the global payroll director for Wonderful Company, which makes packaged foods like pomegranate juice and pistachios, began to believe that she was treated with particular suspicion for being black. She told State Farm it was unlikely that policyholders would receive the same treatment in a white neighborhood.

“It was right after the Malibu fires and I said, ‘Nobody in Malibu would have to justify things like that,'” she said.

Ms. Burgess’ claims “are unfounded,” said Roszell Gadson, a state farm spokesman. “State Farm is committed to a diverse and inclusive environment in which all customers are treated with fairness, respect and dignity.”

Ms. Burgess could not prove that her experience with the state farm adjuster was racism. After all, the same insurer paid out a car insurance claim for their BMW 5 Series sedan, which was also destroyed by the flood; Another group of people took care of it and there wasn’t much to argue about. But Mark Young, the State Farm hired salesman who arranged for her walls and floors to be repaired, and Leonard Redway, the plumber Mrs. Burgess hired to fix a broken pipe, said Mrs. Burgess was treated worse than her white customers. Both are black too.

Redway said applicants in predominantly white, affluent neighborhoods would generally have a much easier time getting insurers to cover repair costs. “If I were in the year 90210, it would be almost like an open check,” he said, referring to the affluent Beverly Hills zip code. “Sometimes the adjusters don’t even come out to see it.”

Accusations of racism are often difficult to prove, but especially in homeowner insurance where insurers have a lot of discretion and don’t always provide detailed explanations as to why claims are denied. Because company representatives often review claims and assess an applicant’s credibility through home visits, face-to-face interactions, and other measures, biases can arise.

While claims disputes are hardly uncommon in the industry, many black customers say they feel they are being treated unfairly because of their race – something Jeff Major, a Manhattan-based public expert who haggles claims with insurance companies on behalf of policyholders, has testified to his work.

“You can actually tell a difference between a Caucasian family and an African-American, Hispanic, or Asian family,” Major said. “It’s kind of known. It is not talked about. It’s a culture. “

The insurers keep their policy sales and claims data firmly under control. They have long argued that the size and timing of disbursements, as well as the neighborhoods in which claims are registered and addressed, are proprietary information and disclosure of this data would affect their competitiveness. They guard it so eagerly that even most regulators do not have detailed information on how insurers evaluate individual claims.

Michael Barry, a spokesman for the Insurance Information Institute, a trade group, said claims data is private because payouts are viewed as “losses” and disclosing them would “put insurers at a competitive disadvantage”.

Where data is publicly available, such as auto insurance, researchers have found that policies discriminate against black drivers by charging them higher premiums. But homeowner insurance was opaque.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Dec. Dec. 23, 2020 at 8:59 p.m. ET

Forcing insurers to segregate data can be difficult, in part because it is regulated by states, not the federal government. For example, federal laws that banned redlining for banks after the civil rights movement don’t apply equally to insurers. And by 2014, 17 states had no bans on racial discrimination by insurers, according to a group of university researchers.

In late September, the Federal Insurance Advisory Board, which includes top executives from the country’s largest insurers, voted against a proposal to investigate racist bias in the industry, fearing that the study would tarnish the distinction between the legitimate discretionary insurers’ claims Claimant and unfair bias.

To assess the veracity of their clients’ claims, insurers send adjusters to meet with claimants in person. This gives companies a wide range of discretion in determining the extent of the damage and what information should be classified as potentially fraudulent.

“Whenever there is a lot of discretion, that discretion can be influenced by implicit or explicit bias,” said Tom Baker, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School who studied insurance payouts to victims of Hurricane Andrew in 1992. Latino applicants have had significantly longer delays in receiving funds from insurers than white applicants.

Lisa Thompson, a black homeowner in Toledo, Ohio, had been living with her daughter while the roof of her home was being repaired when thieves broke into that home, stripped it and tore down her water heater, appliances, and part of her roof. Ms. Thompson filed a lawsuit with her insurer, Allstate.

A adjuster posted by the company accused them of orchestrating the theft, Ms. Thompson said. In order to pursue their claim, Allstate representatives would have to come to the offices of a law firm hired by the company to make a deposit. On December 9, 2019, Ms. Thompson spent nearly four hours answering questions about her employment history, family, and time at the home.

Allstate sent her a letter on June 8, saying that her claim is still being investigated and asked for an additional 180 days to complete the process. Shortly thereafter, she canceled her policy, saying her investigator found that Ms. Thompson did not qualify as a “resident” of her home because she lived with her daughter. But Ms. Thompson didn’t find out her claim had been denied when the New York Times contacted Allstate in November to inquire about her case. The insurer had sent the letter informing her of the denied claim to the address where Mrs. Thompson had not lived.

“We apologize for the failure of your client to receive this correspondence,” an Allstate representative later wrote to an attorney assisting Ms. Thompson with her claim. Your house will remain uninhabitable. She files a discrimination lawsuit against Allstate with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission.

Nicholas Nottoli, an Allstate spokesman, said the claim was denied “on the basis of facts after thorough investigation”. He added that the company had no record of its appraisal accusing Ms. Thompson of helping the thieves and that “race is not a factor in pricing, underwriting or claims settlement”.

Mr. Young, the salesman hired by State Farm to arrange repairs to Ms. Burgess’ house, saw insurers knock down other black customers and lobby on their behalf – even though his Los Angeles company, Valley Green, which specializes in the repair of damaged houses, depends on insurers for companies.

He fought on behalf of Langston Phillips, who nearly lost his house during a fight with his insurer Pacific Specialty. Three years ago, Mr. Phillips’s kitchen had been flooded in a burst pipe and ruined parts of his three-bedroom house in Inglewood. A Pacific Specialty appraiser found that the company owed Mr. Phillips to repair costs of just over $ 11,000. Mr. Phillips’ contractor said his house needs far more extensive repairs.

Pacific Specialty asked Mr. Young to take a look. Mr. Young decided the repairs would cost more than $ 33,000. A battle ensued in which Mr. Young sided with Mr. Phillips despite being hired by Pacific Specialty.

Because of the dispute, the amount Pacific Specialty was willing to pay to pay Mr. Phillips even reached him, forcing him to move into a single hotel room with his two children while he waited for his kitchen to be rebuilt. On a particularly bad day, he emailed a Pacific Specialty representative asking for clarification on when some of that money would arrive. “I’m so lost,” he wrote.

“We strive to pay claims as quickly and fairly as possible in order to bring the insured back to their pre-loss standard of living,” said Kara Holzwarth, Pacific Specialty General Counsel. “We find that water leakage can be fraught with disagreement.” She said Pacific Specialty’s treatment of Mr. Phillips had nothing to do with his race.

After two years of fighting, Mr. Phillips gave up. Concerned about the loss of the house, he moved back in and started working on weekends to pay for the repairs – replacing the cabinets, floors, and plumbing – that he was doing himself. “I’m bone tired,” he said.

Mr. Young has since realized that most insurers are unwilling to work with him. He is currently suing 17 insurance companies in succession for discrimination after the companies refused to include him on their supplier lists. He has reached a confidential settlement in his lawsuit against travelers and has pending complaints against others.

“I’m the only one who rattles the cages,” he said, “and says why don’t you give minority sellers work?”

Niraj Chokshi contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Trump’s Fraud Claims Died in Court docket, however the Fable of Stolen Elections Lives On

Die unbegründeten und verzweifelten Behauptungen von Präsident Trump über eine gestohlene Wahl in den letzten sieben Wochen – die aggressivste Förderung des „Wahlbetrugs“ in der amerikanischen Geschichte – konnten vor Gericht in sieben Bundesstaaten keine Wirkung entfalten oder den erlittenen Verlust annähernd rückgängig machen an Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Aber die Bemühungen haben zu mindestens einem unerwarteten und völlig anderen Ergebnis geführt: Eine gründliche Entlarvung der Art von Wahlbetrug behauptet, die Republikaner hätten verwendet, um das Stimmrecht für den größten Teil des jungen Jahrhunderts zurückzudrängen.

Herr Trump und seine Verbündeten haben eine Reihe von Tropen und Canards ausprobiert, die den Republikanern ähnlich sind, um Gesetze zu rechtfertigen, die in vielen Fällen die Abstimmung für Schwarze und Hispanics überproportional erschwerten , die Demokraten weitgehend unterstützen.

Ihre Behauptungen, dass Tausende von Menschen durch die Annahme anderer Identitäten in Wahllokalen „doppelt gewählt“ hätten, stimmten mit denen überein, die zuvor als Grund für die Einführung strenger neuer Gesetze zur Identifizierung von Wählern angeführt wurden.

Ihre Behauptung, dass eine große Anzahl von Nicht-Bürgern illegale Stimmen für Herrn Biden abgegeben habe, stimmte mit den Behauptungen überein, die Republikaner erhoben haben, um für strenge neue Anforderungen an den „Nachweis der Staatsbürgerschaft“ für die Wählerregistrierung einzutreten.

Und ihre Geschichten über eine große Anzahl von Betrügern, die im Namen von „toten Wählern“ Stimmzettel abgeben, ähnelten denen, mit denen mehrere Staaten aggressive „Säuberungen“ von Abstimmungslisten durchgeführt haben, bei denen Zehntausende von Registrierungen fälschlicherweise zur Kündigung vorgesehen waren.

Nachdem Herr Trump und seine Verbündeten rund 60 Klagen eingereicht und sogar einen finanziellen Anreiz für Informationen über Betrug geboten hatten, konnten sie keinen Fall einer illegalen Abstimmung im Namen ihres Gegners endgültig nachweisen vor Gericht – kein einziger Fall eines undokumentierten Einwanderers, der einen Stimmzettel abgibt, keine doppelte Abstimmung der Bürger oder glaubwürdige Beweise dafür, dass Legionen der stimmberechtigten Toten Herrn Biden einen Sieg bescherten, der nicht ihm gehörte.

“Es sollte wirklich einen Todesstoß in diese Erzählung bringen, die sich mit Behauptungen über Wahlbetrug befasst, die einfach nie begründet wurden”, sagte Kristen Clarke, die Präsidentin des Nationalen Anwaltsausschusses für Bürgerrechte, einer gemeinnützigen Rechtsgruppe und ein ehemaliger Anwalt des Justizministeriums, dessen Arbeit Abstimmungsfälle umfasste. “Sie haben sich selbst vor Gericht gestellt und sind gescheitert.”

Es gibt jedoch keine Anzeichen dafür, dass diese Niederlagen vor Gericht den Verlauf der laufenden Bemühungen zur Einschränkung der Stimmabgabe ändern werden, die seit den umstrittenen Wahlen von 2000 für die konservative Politik von zentraler Bedeutung sind. Dies fiel mit der zunehmenden Besorgnis der Partei zusammen, dass der demografische Wandel die Demokraten in der Bevölkerung begünstigen würde Abstimmung.

Die falschen Vorstellungen haben in Mr. Trumps Twitter- und Facebook-Feeds weitergelebt. im Fernsehprogramm von Fox News, Newsmax und One America News Network; und in Anhörungen im Staatshaus, in denen republikanische Führer auf der Grundlage der zurückgewiesenen Anschuldigungen über restriktivere Wahlgesetze nachgedacht haben.

In Georgien haben republikanische Gesetzgeber bereits die Verschärfung der staatlichen Regeln für die Briefwahl und die Identifizierung der Wähler erörtert. In Pennsylvania erwägen republikanische Gesetzgeber, Schritte rückgängig zu machen, die die Abstimmung in Abwesenheit erleichtert hatten, und ihre Kollegen in Wisconsin erwägen ebenfalls strengere Beschränkungen für die Briefwahl sowie für die vorzeitige Abstimmung.

Wenn überhaupt, hat Präsident Trump der Bewegung, den Zugang zu Stimmzetteln zu beschränken, neue Impulse gegeben und ist gleichzeitig der einzigartige, charismatische Führer geworden, den er nie hatte.

Nachdem er geradezu erklärt hatte, dass ein hohes Wahlniveau schlecht für die Republikaner sei, überzeugte er seine Basis davon, dass das Wahlsystem von Betrug verfault ist, und betrachtete diese Fiktion als ein Grundprinzip der Partei. Mehrere kürzlich durchgeführte Umfragen haben gezeigt, dass die Mehrheit der Republikaner die Wahlen für betrügerisch hält, obwohl Wahlbeamte im ganzen Land berichten, dass sie überraschend verlaufen sind Selbst bei einer Pandemie reibungslos, mit außergewöhnlich hoher Wahlbeteiligung und ohne Anzeichen von Betrug, abgesehen von dem üblichen Zertrümmern von schlechten Schauspielern oder Fehlern von gut gemeinten Wählern.

In den letzten anderthalb Monaten der Gerichtsurteile wurden Wahlbetrugsvorwürfe immer wieder als unzureichend oder glaubwürdig zurückgewiesen, häufig von von Republikanern ernannten Richtern.

Herr Trump und seine Verbündeten haben argumentiert, dass die 59 Verluste, die sie in 60 seit dem Wahltag eingereichten Klagen erlitten haben, auf Verfahrensentscheidungen beruhten, und sich darüber beschwert, dass die Richter sich geweigert haben, die Einzelheiten der Vorwürfe zu prüfen, mit denen sie versucht haben, eine Wahl zu stürzen. Herr Biden gewann mit 7 Millionen Stimmen (und mit 74 im Wahlkollegium).

Laut einer Analyse der New York Times haben sie jedoch in mehr als zwei Dritteln ihrer Fälle nicht einmal offiziell Betrug behauptet und stattdessen argumentiert, dass lokale Beamte von den Wahlkodizes abgewichen seien, die Wahlen nicht ordnungsgemäß verwaltet hätten oder dass die am Wahltag geltenden Regeln nicht eingehalten worden seien waren selbst illegal.

In dem Einzelfall, in dem Herr Trump gewann, forderte seine Kampagne eine staatlich angeordnete Fristverlängerung in Pennsylvania für die Vorlage eines Personalausweises für per Post versandte Stimmzettel heraus, was sich auf eine geringe Anzahl von Stimmen auswirkte.

In fast einem Dutzend Fällen hatten ihre Betrugsvorwürfe tatsächlich ihre Tage vor Gericht und brachen unter Kontrolle immer wieder zusammen.

Trotz des endgültigen Charakters dieser Entscheidungen bestand die Antwort der Republikaner darin, an den Betrugsfiktionen des Präsidenten festzuhalten.

Die Republikaner im Kongress haben sie ebenfalls befördert, da Herr Trump Senatoren und Mitglieder des Repräsentantenhauses dazu drängt, die Ergebnisse des Wahlkollegiums bei einer angeblichen Verfahrensabstimmung abzulehnen, um Herrn Bidens klaren Sieg über den Präsidenten am 6. Januar zu bestätigen.

In einer Anhörung des Senats am 16. Dezember beispielsweise wiederholte Senator James Lankford aus Oklahoma eine Reihe von Behauptungen der Trump-Kampagne wegen illegaler Wahlen in Nevada.

“42.000 Menschen in Nevada haben Ihrer Arbeit zufolge mehr als einmal gewählt”, sagte Lankford während der Befragung eines Anwalts der Trump-Kampagne, Jesse Binnall. Herr Lankford wiederholte die Behauptungen der Trump-Kampagne, dass Tote, Einwohner außerhalb des Bundesstaates und Nicht-Staatsbürger in Nevada in beträchtlicher Zahl illegale Stimmzettel abgegeben hätten. Die Kampagne hatte diese Anschuldigungen auf Analysen gestützt, die Abstimmungslisten mit Aufzeichnungen aus kommerziellen und staatlichen Quellen abgleichen.

Der Prozessrichter im Fall Nevada hatte die Klage jedoch fast zwei Wochen zuvor abgewiesen und diese Analysen als nicht stichhaltig und nicht überzeugend zurückgewiesen. Er erklärte, die Kampagne habe „unter keinem Beweisstandard bewiesen, dass illegale Stimmen abgegeben und gezählt wurden“.

Solch ein sogenannter “Listenabgleich”, auf den sich Staaten verlassen, um ihre Liste ungültiger Wähler zu reduzieren, erfordert sorgfältige Arbeit von langjährigen Experten. Es ist leicht schlecht zu machen. Es waren schlecht konzipierte oder schlecht durchgeführte Datenanalysen, die Georgia und Texas kürzlich dazu veranlassten, Zehntausende gültiger Registrierungen zu Unrecht zu eliminieren und den Kurs erst umzukehren, nachdem Stimmrechtsgruppen und andere auf die Fehler aufmerksam gemacht hatten.

Konservative haben solche Datenanalysen auch verwendet, um im Laufe der Jahre wilde Behauptungen über Wahlbetrug aufzustellen, und sind häufig vor Gericht auf Stolpersteine ​​gestoßen, da sich herausstellte, dass sie stark fehlerhaft oder falsch waren.

Dieses Muster hielt auch in der diesjährigen Flut von Pro-Trump-Klagen an.

Zum Beispiel haben die Republikaner bei der Verbreitung ihrer Fälle im ganzen Land auf Datenanalysen eines Cybersecurity-Managers und eines einmaligen texanischen Kongresskandidaten namens Russell J. Ramsland Jr. verwiesen. In einem seiner Berichte wurde behauptet, dass verschiedene Bezirke in Michigan Stimmenzahlen hatten, die über ihrer Bevölkerung lagen , was bedeutet, dass ihre Gesamtzahl mit illegalen Stimmzetteln aufgefüllt wurde; Es stellte sich heraus, dass sich die fraglichen Grafschaften in Minnesota befanden, nicht in Michigan.

Ebenso wurden mehrere spezifische Anschuldigungen, dass Menschen illegal Stimmzettel im Namen von Toten abgegeben haben, aus einer amateurhaften Datenanalyse geboren, die sich später als fehlerhaft erwies.

In einem Bundesfall, den die Trump-Kampagne mit sich brachte, um die Zertifizierung der Ergebnisse in Michigan zu verzögern, war die spezifische Erwähnung eines von einem toten Wähler abgegebenen Stimmzettels falsch: Durch die Registrierung des Toten wurde keine Stimme abgegeben. Vielmehr stimmte ein Mann mit genau demselben Namen legal ab. (Mr. Trumps Team zog diesen Fall aus der Akte, als Michigan sich der Zertifizierung näherte.)

Dies ist ein häufiges Problem bei Behauptungen über „tote Wähler“, „Doppelwähler“ und „nichtstaatliche“ Wähler. Blinde Vergleiche offizieller Daten führen häufig dazu, dass „falsch positive Ergebnisse“ zwei Personen mit demselben Namen wie dieselbe Person behandeln.

In Georgien versuchen Anwälte des Außenministers, dass das Gericht eine „Experten“ -Analyse ablehnt, in der festgestellt wird, dass das Gewinnergebnis von Herrn Biden mehr als 10.000 Stimmzettel von toten Bürgern enthielt. Der staatliche Experte in diesem Fall, der MIT-Politikwissenschaftler Charles Stewart III, kam zu dem Schluss, dass die Trump-Kampagne nur “die unauffällige Tatsache zu identifizieren schien, dass einige Georgier, die gewählt haben, den Namen und das Geburtsjahr einer anderen Person teilen, die gestorben ist” Staatsanwälte sagen es. In mehreren anderen Fällen erwiesen sich die „toten Wähler“, in deren Namen die Trump-Kampagne sagte, dass Stimmzettel abgegeben wurden, als sehr lebendig.

In der vergangenen Woche haben die Behörden in Pennsylvania eine Festnahme aufgrund einer Anschuldigung vorgenommen, die die Trump-Kampagne erstmals im November erhoben hatte. Die Staatsanwaltschaft von Delaware County sagte, ein Mann namens Bruce Bartman habe im Namen seiner verstorbenen Mutter eine Briefwahl abgegeben – für Mr. Trump. Der Anwalt von Herrn Bartman sagte, Herr Bartman habe dies als fehlgeleitete „Form des Protests“ getan, und der örtliche Staatsanwalt sagte, es sei nichts weiter als „ein Beweis dafür, dass eine Person Wahlbetrug begangen hat“.

Herr Trump und seine Verbündeten haben auch Wahlbeamte selbst angegriffen. In einer neuen Variante der Mythologie des Wahlbetrugs haben sie behauptet, die Beamten hätten sich entweder an fantastischen Betrugsprogrammen beteiligt oder seien bereit, daran teilzunehmen. In mehreren Staaten wurden solche Anschuldigungen von Richtern kurzerhand zurückgewiesen.

In Arizona reichten die Republikaner eine Bundesklage ein, in der sie behaupteten, sowohl Wahlhelfer als auch demokratische Beamte, die die Wahlen überwachen, hätten eine beliebige Anzahl betrügerischer Aktivitäten “aufrechterhalten” können. Die Richterin Diane J. Humetewa, eine vom ehemaligen Präsidenten Barack Obama ernannte Richterin, wies die Klage ab und sagte, dass „diese Anspielungen die Standards für Betrugsvorwürfe nicht erfüllen“.

In Michigan wurde Richter Timothy M. Kenny, ein Staatsrichter, gebeten, die Behauptung zu prüfen, dass Wahlbeamte Menschen zur Stimmabgabe „gecoacht“ hätten – eine Behauptung, die laut Richter bei der Entlassung ohne einen Ort, ein Datum oder eine andere relevante Aussage aufgestellt wurde Einzelheiten.

Nur wenige Betrugsvorwürfe aus der Trump-Ära haben sich in konservativen Medien so gut durchgesetzt wie solche, die computergestützte Abstimmungssysteme beinhalten, die angeblich Trump-Stimmen auf Biden-Stimmen „umstellen“.

Eine der wildesten dieser Behauptungen war die Anschuldigung, dass Beamte in mindestens vier Bundesstaaten von Dominion Voting Systems erstellte Stimmzettel verwendet haben, um Hunderttausende, wenn nicht Millionen Stimmen von Herrn Trump an Herrn Biden abzugeben.

Diese unwahrscheinliche Verschwörung wurde in vier Klagen von Sidney Powell, einem ehemaligen Anwalt für die Trump-Kampagne, am ausführlichsten ausgestrahlt.

Ihre persönliche Bilanz ähnelt der aller anderen gescheiterten republikanischen Wahlbetrugsklagen. Trotz der Widerlegung durch Richter und Wahlbeamte im ganzen Land wurde ihre Erzählung in den rechten Medien immer wieder wiederholt, um sicherzustellen, dass der Begriff des umfassenden Betrugs ungehindert an Bedeutung gewinnt.

Ein Richter in Phoenix nannte Frau Powells Beschwerde “ohne plausible Anschuldigungen”. Eine Richterin in Michigan schrieb, dass Frau Powells Überzeugung, dass Wahlmaschinen das Wahlergebnis veränderten, „eine Verschmelzung von Theorien, Vermutungen und Spekulationen“ sei.

Die gründlichste Entlarvung von Frau Powells Verschwörungen erfolgte letzte Woche in einem blasigen Brief von Dominion, in dem die Integrität seiner Maschinen bestätigt wurde, der in unabhängigen Audits überprüft wurde. Das Unternehmen forderte sie auf, ihre Aussagen zurückzuziehen, und beschuldigte sie, sich auf eine „rücksichtslose Desinformationskampagne“ einzulassen.

Dominion gab an, dass es auch rechtliche Schritte gegen Rudolph W. Giuliani, der die rechtlichen Bemühungen von Herrn Trump nach der Wahl angeführt hat, und mehrere prominente konservative Medienvertreter überlegte.

Während sie ihren Betrugsmythos auf nationaler Ebene weiter vorantreibt, hat Frau Powell ihre Argumente vor den Obersten Gerichtshof gebracht und dabei engen Kontakt zu Herrn Trump gehalten, der sich persönlich im Weißen Haus getroffen hat.

Die Stadt Detroit beantragt Sanktionen gegen Frau Powell, und die Generalstaatsanwältin von Michigan, Dana Nessel, sagt, sie erwäge dies auch wegen „absichtlicher Falschdarstellungen“ in den rechtlichen Unterlagen von Frau Powell.

Trotz alledem lebt die Handlung weiter, sogar an Heiligabend, als sich Herr Trump die Zeit nahm, auf Twitter zu schreiben: „VOTER BETRUG IST KEINE VERSPRECHUNGSTHEORIE.“

Categories
Business

Google Denies Antitrust Claims in Early Response to U.S. Lawsuit

Google said Monday that it had not used its multi-billion dollar deals with other major technology firms to protect its position as the dominant online search engine. This was the company’s first formal rebuttal of Justice Department allegations that these deals violated antitrust laws.

The filing, a 42-page document, is a paragraph – and sometimes sentence – denial of claims by the government and a group of states that have joined their lawsuit. In the filing, Google says it “developed, continuously innovated and promoted” its search product as part of its mission to “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful”.

“People use Google Search because they choose, not because they’re forced to, or because they can’t just find alternative ways to search for information on the Internet,” the company said.

The filing is Google’s most significant to date in its antitrust battle with the Justice Department, but it will not be the last by a long way. The judge, Amit Mehta, said last week that the trial would not start until 2023.

Google has a growing number of legal disputes in the United States. Republican attorneys general in Texas and other states said in a lawsuit last week that Google broke the law to maintain and protect a monopoly on the technology that serves ads over the Internet.

A day later, a bipartisan group of states led by Colorado and Nebraska filed their own lawsuit focusing on the search business and expanded the Justice Department’s allegations in October. They asked to combine their case with the federal lawsuit.

The lawsuits are at the center of a growing legal backlash against the power of tech giants to act as gatekeepers for trade, communication and culture. The Federal Trade Commission and 40 attorneys general filed lawsuits against Facebook this month, saying they stamped out the competition by buying Instagram and WhatsApp, a lawsuit that the company could ultimately resolve if successful. Federal and state officials are also pursuing investigations against Amazon and Apple.

The Justice Department said in its lawsuit that Google had agreements with device manufacturers like Apple, Samsung, and LG to ensure that it was the default search engine on their phones. This pole position is powerful and prevents competing search products like DuckDuckGo from growing, prosecutors said. Eleven attorneys general signed the lawsuit when it was filed. Other states, including California, have asked to join the case.

The company claims that buying standard shelf space on mobile devices is no different from a consumer brand buying preferred shelf space in a grocery store. It is also argued that it is easy for Apple and Android smartphone users to switch from its search service to that of a competitor.

In its filing on Monday, Google admitted that some of the government’s claims were upheld: True, the company said that some dictionaries classify “Google” as a verb. It admitted that “it started in a garage in Menlo Park 22 years ago, creating an innovative way to search the internet. “

And it admitted that its parent company Alphabet is valued at around $ 1 trillion – but denied that such a claim could be made through Google itself.

A Justice Department spokeswoman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Categories
Business

Unemployment Claims Present Influence of Layoffs as Virus Surges

The surge in coronavirus cases is rippling through the economy, forcing employers to lay off workers with an extraordinarily high layoff rate, even as new vaccines and the possibility of further government aid offer hope for the next year.

The number of Americans filing initial unemployment insurance claims remained high last week, the Department of Labor reported Thursday. After falling earlier in the fall, claims have risen, dwarfing the pace of past recessions.

Consumer caution, coupled with new restrictions on business activities such as indoor restaurants, has hit the hotel, lodging, airline and other service industries. The debut of a coronavirus vaccine offers some prospect of relief, but until mass vaccination begins next year the economy will remain under pressure.

“Companies are closing, and as a result, job losses are increasing – and that is exactly what we feared we were going into the winter,” said Rubeela Farooqi, US chief economist at High Frequency Economics. “It will definitely be a challenging couple of months.”

The pace of retail sales has already slowed, as has overall economic growth. Few expect coronavirus cases to subside this winter and further drag on economic activity, but advances on a new relief law on Capitol Hill could ease the blow.

935,000 new state benefit claims were made last week, compared to 956,000 the previous week. Adjusted for seasonal fluctuations, last week’s value was 885,000, an increase of 23,000.

There have been 455,000 new applications for assistance from Pandemic Unemployment, a government-funded program for part-time workers, the self-employed, and other people who are normally not eligible for unemployment benefits. This sum, which was not seasonally adjusted, increased by 40,000 compared to the previous week.

The move to limit business and consumer activities by government agencies was evident in the new data. In Illinois, where indoor eating was banned on November 20, claims rose by over 35,000. In California, where restrictions went into effect December 3, new registrations rose by nearly 24,000.

As of late November, more than 20 million workers were receiving unemployment benefits under state or federal programs, according to data from the Department of Labor. Although the unemployment rate fell from 14.7 percent in April to 6.7 percent in November, the ongoing layoffs underscore the economic fragility of many Americans.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Apr. 17, 2020, 4:35 pm ET

“We’re not going in the right direction,” said Gregory Daco, chief US economist at Oxford Economics. “With the services expiring, it’s even more worrying.”

The pain in the labor market is particularly acute for the less skilled, whose jobs and finances are far more affected than those of wealthier Americans.

The S&P 500, the Dow Jones Industrials and the Nasdaq Composite Index closed at record highs on Thursday and have completed a strong rally in recent weeks. The IPO was hot news and shaped thousands of paper millionaires in Silicon Valley and elsewhere.

The housing market has also been resilient, fueled by low interest rates that make mortgages more affordable as city dwellers flee to the suburbs.

Total wages and salaries have returned to pre-pandemic levels at $ 9.6 trillion a month after falling below $ 8.7 trillion in the depths of the spring recession. But the American share of the labor force remains well below a year ago, underscoring the deep hole the economy is slowly working its way out of.

Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress resumed talks Thursday on another pandemic relief bill that economists have warned is overdue. With no action taken, two key unemployed programs will expire this month – Pandemic Unemployment Assistance and Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation, which provide extra weeks of assistance after government benefits expire and cut payments to millions.

In addition to extending these programs, the $ 900 billion package is expected to include $ 600 stimulus payments to individuals, a $ 300 weekly unemployment benefit allowance, and rent and food aid.

The $ 2.2 trillion CARES bill, passed in March, has been credited with helping the economy weather the depths of lockdowns in many parts of the country last spring. But partisan battles in Washington have held up renewed federal support for months.

Economists have warned that without a new aid package from Washington, economic growth could stay flat in the first quarter of 2021. In addition, the abrupt end of unemployment benefits for millions could further weigh on consumer spending.

Data released on Wednesday showed retail sales declined 1.1 percent in November, a disappointing start to the crucial Christmas season. Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC Financial Services, expects economic growth to be weak for the next several months before accelerating later in 2021.

“Until we vaccinate many people, the economy will face a difficult test,” he said. “I don’t know if there will be a total decline or loss of jobs, but the pace of improvement will slow significantly.”

Categories
Business

Unemployment Claims Present Toll of Rising Covid Instances: Reside Updates

Here’s what you need to know:

Credit…Maddie McGarvey for The New York Times

Rising Covid-19 cases are taking a steep toll on economic activity, battering the labor market even as new vaccines offer a ray of hope for next year.

The number of Americans filing initial claims for unemployment insurance remained high last week, the Labor Department reported Thursday. After dropping earlier in the fall, claims have moved higher, and they remain at levels that dwarf the pace of past recessions.

There were 935,000 new claims for state benefits, compared with 956,000 the previous week, while 455,000 filed for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, a federally funded program for part-time workers, the self-employed and others ordinarily ineligible for jobless benefits.

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the number of new state claims was 885,000, an increase of 23,000 from the previous week.

Consumer caution, coupled with new restrictions on business activity like indoor dining, has pummeled the hospitality industry, lodging, airlines and other service businesses. The debut of a coronavirus vaccine this week offers the prospect of relief, but until mass inoculations begin next year, the economy will remain under pressure.

“Businesses are closing, and as a result, we are seeing job losses mount — and that’s exactly what we were fearful of going into the winter,” said Rubeela Farooqi, chief U.S. economist at High Frequency Economics. “It’s going to be a challenging few months, no doubt.”

At the end of November, more than 20 million workers were collecting unemployment benefits under state or federal programs, Labor Department data indicates.

With the weakening economy as the backdrop, Republican and Democratic leaders in Congress continued talks on Wednesday on another pandemic relief bill, something that economists have warned is overdue. Without action, two key programs for unemployed workers will expire this month, cutting off benefits to millions.

“We are not moving in the right direction,” said Gregory Daco, chief U.S. economist at Oxford Economics. “With the looming expiration of benefits, it’s even more worrisome.”

Data released on Wednesday showed a 1.1 percent drop in retail sales in November, a disappointing start to the crucial holiday season. Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC Financial Services, expects economic growth to be weak for the next few months before picking up later in 2021.

“Until we get a lot of people vaccinated, the economy will face a difficult test,” he said. “I don’t know if we will see an outright contraction or the loss of jobs, but the pace of improvement will slow markedly.”

Christian Smalls leads a workers strike at the Amazon fulfillment center on Staten Island in May.Credit…Gabriela Bhaskar for The New York Times

The National Labor Relations Board said on Thursday that it had found merit in a complaint that Amazon wrongfully fired a warehouse worker in retaliation for organizing colleagues concerned about pandemic safety conditions.

Kevin Petroccione, a congressional liaison for the National Labor Relations Board, said if Amazon did not settle, the board would file a formal complaint against the company.

Amazon did not respond to a request for comment. The finding was earlier reported by Vice.

The charge of unfair labor practices was brought by Gerald Bryson, who worked at Amazon’s warehouse in Staten Island, N.Y. Mr. Bryson had joined with other workers, including one named Christian Smalls, in a protest over safety concerns in late March after the pandemic struck. Amazon immediately fired Mr. Smalls. About a week later, Mr. Bryson protested again in the parking lot of the building.

Amazon fired Mr. Bryson about two weeks later, saying he had violated the company’s vulgar language policy during a confrontation with another worker in the second protest, according to Frank Kearl, Mr. Bryson’s lawyer.

In June, Mr. Bryson filed a case with the National Labor Relations Board, effectively saying that Amazon selectively enforced its vulgar language policy as an excuse to retaliate against Mr. Bryson for his organizing. Mr. Kearl said the agency told him of the finding late last month.

If Amazon does not reach a settlement, which could include back pay or reinstating Mr. Bryson’s job, the agency plans to file a complaint to be heard by an administrative law judge. It filed a similar retaliation complaint against Amazon in a case of a worker in Pennsylvania who protested conditions during the pandemic. That case is pending.

Do you work in an Amazon warehouse and have a labor issue? We want to hear from you. Contact the reporter of this article at karen.weise@nytimes.com.

Nearly a year after the coronavirus outbreak, the full impact of the pandemic on the U.S. economy remains unclear. Some of the most obvious indicators are in conflict: As some companies report enormous profits, the number of unemployed Americans is nearly 10 million more than it was in February, and hundreds of thousands are expected to have filed new unemployment claims last week.

The Times interviewed a rage of economists and experts who suggested looking at eight measures to understand the state of the economy that President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. will face on Jan. 20.

  • Wages: That wages and salaries have bounced back quickly is a sign that things are on track for a rapid recovery. During the last recession — which Mr. Biden and then-President Barack Obama inherited in 2009 — drops of wages and salaries took years to recover.

  • Unemployment for Black men: The current crisis has had a particularly negative, persistent impact on employment for Black men, who face an unemployment rate of 11.3 percent, five percentage points higher than the unemployment rate for white men.

  • Long-term unemployment: The number of Americans who are still in the labor force but have been unemployed for more than six months has been increasing since April. A sociologist with a left-leaning think tank said the rise in long-term unemployment, coupled with the fact that millions of workers have left the labor market altogether since February, indicated “a very serious problem in connecting people who are able to produce needed goods and services with the opportunity to do so.”

  • Housing costs: Home prices and rents have risen during the pandemic. But while the rising costs have strained low-income renters, the rise in housing prices typically signals strong economic growth.

  • New businesses: Even as countless businesses have been forced to close over the course of the pandemic, the increase in business applications over the last year is a sign that the economy may be adapting rather than totally seizing.

  • Spending on goods: Though the pandemic has altered Americans’ day-to-day lives, it hasn’t halted their spending as much as some feared it would. Consumption has shifted toward goods over services — buying alcohol from stores instead of from bars, for example — bucking a generational trend toward a service economy.

  • Food scarcity — More families across the country are unable to meet their basic needs for housing and food security, according to a Census Bureau survey.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi in the Capitol. After months of stalemate, congressional leaders were on the verge of cementing a stimulus deal.Credit…Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times

Top Democrats and Republicans in Congress haggled on Thursday over the remaining hurdles to an emerging $900 billion stimulus deal, with Democrats making a last-ditch effort to use the package to deliver more emergency aid to states struggling amid the pandemic.

With Congress running out of time to deliver another round of relief to Americans and stave off a government shutdown on Friday, Speaker Nancy Pelosi reported more momentum toward a compromise that could be ready as early as today.

“We made some progress this morning,” Ms. Pelosi, of California, told reporters at the Capitol. Asked if a final agreement would be announced within the day, she said: “We’ll let you know.”

The plan under discussion would provide a dose of badly needed relief after months of stalled negotiations and amid a national public health crisis that has killed more than 307,000 people.

That includes a new round of stimulus payments, probably $600, to American adults; a temporary infusion of enhanced federal jobless aid of around $300 per week; and rental and food assistance. It would also revive a loan program for struggling small businesses and provide funding for schools, hospitals and the distribution of the vaccine.

With plans to merge a final agreement with a sweeping omnibus government funding package, Congress may have to approve another stopgap spending measure to avert a government shutdown on Friday while negotiators put the finishing touches on the stimulus deal. Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and the majority leader, warned Republicans on Wednesday that they should prepare to remain in Washington through the weekend.

“I hope it wouldn’t be more than 24 or 48 hours,” Senator John Thune of South Dakota, the No. 2 Republican, said of a possible stopgap bill, adding, “I really think this is coming to a close.”

Ms. Pelosi, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the minority leader, and Steven Mnuchin, the Treasury secretary, spoke late Wednesday evening to continue ironing out differences over the measure, a spokesman for Ms. Pelosi said, and they planned to continue talks on Thursday.

In order to reach an agreement, Republicans appear to have dropped their demand for a sweeping coronavirus liability shield for businesses in exchange for Democrats agreeing to exclude a direct funding stream for state and local governments that are facing fiscal crises, according to two officials familiar with the discussions.

But Democrats were pushing to provide billions of dollars for governors to use for health-related expenses during the pandemic — including vaccine distribution — and extend emergency federal assistance for states and local governments through the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Republicans who have fiercely opposed sending more aid to states and cities were resisting the moves, concerned about leaving FEMA with enough money for future natural disasters and about the lack of restrictions on how the funds are spent.

Some Republicans — in particular Senator Patrick J. Toomey, Republican of Pennsylvania — were pushing to curtail the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending authority, which Democrats argue would hamper the Biden administration’s ability to continue supporting the country’s economic recovery. After the Federal Reserve used such authority earlier this year after the enactment of the $2.2 trillion stimulus law, Mr. Mnuchin clawed back the remaining funds in part to offset the cost of another stimulus bill.

There is also a push to include billions of dollars in relief for theaters and venues, something that lawmakers in both parties support.

Zach Montague contributed reporting.

By: Ella Koeze·Source: Refinitiv

  • A generally upbeat mood prevailed in global stock markets on Thursday, as lawmakers from both parties in Washington signaled they were close to reaching a deal on an economic aid package, an extraordinary shift in tone from both Republicans and Democrats, and more people received a coronavirus vaccine.

  • Investors are also looking toward an economic recovery sometime next year with one coronavirus vaccine already approved in several countries, and a second close to receiving emergency approval.

  • Still, the pandemic is far from over and continuing to take a staggering human and economic toll. Claims for state unemployment insurance illustrated this on Thursday, with 935,000 filing new claims last week, the Labor Department said.

  • The market gains on Thursday were relatively small: the S&P 500 rose about half a percent in early trading. The Stoxx Europe 600 gained 0.5 percent, while the FTSE in Britain was flat. Most Asian indexes closed the day with gains.

  • In Washington, talks continued on a $900 billion stimulus plan that would provide a new round of direct payments to millions of Americans as well as additional unemployment benefits, food assistance and rental aid. Republicans and Democrats alike signaled that they were ready to coalesce around the main elements, though a final agreement hasn’t been reached.

  • The Federal Reserve chair, Jerome H. Powell, on Wednesday made a point of saying the central bank was in no mood to begin scaling back its efforts to bolster the economy. He said the Fed’s policy decisions were intended to show that policymakers would “deliver powerful support to the economy until the recovery is complete.” He said the economy would face near-term challenges, but would likely bounce back quickly once vaccines were widely available, perhaps by midyear.

Baiju Bhatt and Vladimir Tenev, Robinhood’s co-founders, in 2018. Millions of investors have turned to the app in recent years.Credit…Reuters

The Securities and Exchange Commission on Thursday said that Robinhood, the stock trading app, had misled its customers about how it was paid by Wall Street firms for passing along customer trades, the latest enforcement action against the popular platform.

Robinhood agreed to pay a $65 million fine to settle the charges, the latest blow to the company whose popularity has surged since its founding, offering commission-free trading and an easy-to-use app. Critics have said that the company relied on practices that hurt its rapidly growing base of customers, who tend to be younger and less experienced.

The charges announced on Thursday apply to Robinhood’s disclosures from 2015 to late 2018, the regulator said.

The S.E.C. had charged Robinhood with “repeated misstatements that failed to disclose the firm’s receipt of payments from trading firms for routing customer orders to them, and with failing to satisfy its duty to seek the best reasonably available terms to execute customer orders,” it said in a statement.

“Robinhood provided misleading information to customers about the true costs of choosing to trade with the firm,” Stephanie Avakian, director of the S.E.C.’s enforcement division, said in a statement. “Brokerage firms cannot mislead customers about order execution quality.”

As part of the settlement, Robinhood did not admit or deny the allegations. But Dan Gallagher, its chief legal officer, said that the company was committed to helping meet its customers’ needs. “The settlement relates to historical practices that do not reflect Robinhood today,” he said in a statement.

Millions of investors have turned to Robinhood in recent years, lured by the simple fact that the site allows investors to trade without paying commissions. Much of the retail brokerage industry has since followed suit, resulting in a surge of retail trading activity this year.

Because they do not charge commissions, brokerage firms like Robinhood make money by charging high-speed trading firms for the right to execute their clients’ orders, a practice called payment for order flow. The trading firms are willing to pay Robinhood because they can eke out incremental gains on individual trades, which because of their speed and scale add up to large amounts of money.

But that also means that the high-speed trading firms determine the price one of Robinhood’s clients would pay for shares, or what they might receive for selling stock.

The S.E.C. said that for several years, the company had failed to be transparent with customers about its use of payment for order flow. It also said that the brokerage firm had violated a duty to get customers the best possible prices for their orders, tying that failure to the high payment rates it received from trading firms in exchange for customers’ trades.

In its order summarizing the settlement, the S.E.C. said that although the company was publicly declaring that its customers were getting trading terms as good as or better than what rivals offered, internal reviews showed that was far from the case.

The federal charges come a day after regulators in Massachusetts accused Robinhood of aggressively courting and manipulating inexperienced investors and then failing to protect them. In a complaint, the Massachusetts secretary of the commonwealth, William F. Galvin, said that Robinhood focused on signing up young traders with perks like free shares, and then used “gamification” marketing techniques to persuade them to trade often.

Matt Phillips and Gregory Schmidt contributed reporting.

Google received a kernel of good news on Thursday when European Union authorities approved its acquisition of the fitness-tracking company Fitbit after a lengthy review to determine whether the $2.1 billion takeover violated antitrust laws.

European regulators had been under pressure to block the deal, first announced last year, but allowed it to move forward after Google agreed not use the health and fitness data collected from Fitbit’s wearable devices and services to target ads at internet users. Google also agreed to continue providing its free Android software to competing makers of fitness and health devices.

The announcement comes as Google faces two antitrust lawsuits in the United States. On Wednesday, 10 state attorneys general accused the Silicon Valley giant of abusing its power in digital advertising. In October, the Justice Department accused the company of using illegal tactics to maintain dominance for its search engine.

The European Commission, the E.U.’s executive body, has brought three antitrust cases against Google in recent years. The company is appealing the fines.

The central bank left its benchmark interest rate at 0.1 percent and did not increase its purchases of government bonds. Credit…Andrew Testa for The New York Times

The Bank of England, which has been battling not only a pandemic but the threat of a disruptive exit from the European Union, made no changes to its monetary policy Thursday amid signs that both threats could be receding.

The central bank left its benchmark interest rate at 0.1 percent and did not increase its purchases of government bonds. In November, at its last meeting, the bank’s Monetary Policy Committee expanded the bond purchases, a way of holding down market interest rates, by £150 billion. The bank said Thursday it would continue to aim for total asset purchases of £895 billion, or $1.2 trillion.

The bank also extended by six months a program that allows commercial banks to borrow money at or close to the benchmark interest rate, if they funnel the money to small and midsize businesses.

Successful development of vaccines against the coronavirus are “likely to reduce the downside risks to the economic outlook from Covid,” the Monetary Policy Committee said in a statement. But the committee also said growth would be “a little weaker” than policymakers expected in November because of sharper lockdowns.

Negotiators for Britain and the European Union continued to meet in Brussels on Thursday, and there were indications they had narrowed their differences, potentially averting a no-deal Brexit that would be bad for both economies, but especially Britain’s.

In one example of the potential damage, the German automaker BMW warned that it would have to significantly raise prices for cars sold in Britain if there were no deal. Nicolas Peter, the company’s chief financial officer, told German media on Wednesday that BMW would also have to raise the price of British-made Minis sold in Europe because of import and export tariffs.

  • Unilever, a major advertiser, said it would resume spending in January on U.S. ads on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter but would continue to monitor the social media platforms for hate speech, misinformation and postelection “polarization.” The company stepped away in June but said on Thursday that it was “encouraged by the platforms’ new commitments and reporting to monitor progress.”

  • Ten state attorneys general on Wednesday accused Google of illegally abusing its monopoly over the technology that delivers ads online. The state prosecutors said that Google overcharged publishers for the ads it showed across the web and edged out rivals who tried to challenge the company’s dominance. They also said that Google had reached an agreement with Facebook to limit the social network’s own efforts to compete with Google for ad dollars. Google said the suit was “baseless” and that it would fight the case.

  • Tyson Foods has fired seven workers accused of being involved in a betting pool over how many employees would get the coronavirus, the company said Wednesday. The son of a meatpacking worker who died in April filed a suit claiming that the manager of the Waterloo, Iowa, pork plant organized a “cash buy-in, winner take all” betting pool. In all, about 1,000 workers at the plant — about a third of the work force — tested positive for the virus. Tyson had hired the law firm Covington & Burling to conduct an independent investigation of the matter, led by Eric H. Holder Jr., the former U.S. attorney general.

The Pandemic’s Toll

Credit…Audra Melton for The New York TimesCredit…Audra Melton for The New York Times

There remains widespread confusion about a key element of the plan to protect some of the most vulnerable Americans against the coronavirus, report Rebecca Robbins and Jessica Silver-Greenberg for The New York Times: how nursing homes will get consent to vaccinate residents who aren’t able to make their own medical decisions.

Some states are starting vaccinations in their nursing homes this week, but a broader nationwide effort will start in earnest on Monday as CVS and Walgreens employees begin to arrive at tens of thousands of nursing homes and assisted-living facilities to vaccinate staff and residents.

A CVS executive said such residents’ legal representatives will be able to provide consent to nursing homes electronically or over the phone, but officials at multiple large nursing home chains said they were not aware of that.

If residents or their representatives have not given consent before CVS or Walgreens employees show up, it is not clear whether or when they will have another chance to be inoculated.

There is no federal requirement for people to give consent before getting vaccinated, but it is standard practice and is often needed for billing purposes. States have different requirements about how medical consent can be given and what information needs to be provided to the person who is consenting. Guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is that residents or their representatives should receive a fact sheet about the coronavirus vaccine and then consent to receiving it.

Executives from CVS and Walgreens said in interviews that they had been planning the vaccination campaign for months and were confident it would work. “If there are concerns or challenges, we certainly are open to work with facilities to try to minimize any disruption that they may have,” said Rick Gates, a Walgreens executive leading the company’s planning.

Categories
Business

Unemployment Claims Rise as Financial Disaster Grinds On: Reside Updates

Here’s what you need to know:

Credit…Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times

The Treasury secretary, Steven Mnuchin, was rebuked on Thursday at a congressional oversight hearing over his management of the economic relief effort, facing criticism from lawmakers over his decision to pull the plug on five of the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending programs.

Scrutiny of Mr. Mnuchin’s handling of the programs comes as he is negotiating with Congress over another $900 billion economic relief bill that lawmakers hope to pass before the end of the year.

The criticism over Mr. Mnuchin’s decision to end the Fed programs adds to the controversy surrounding one of his final acts as Treasury secretary. Mr. Mnuchin insisted again on Thursday that he was following the intent of the law in ending the lending programs at year-end and in clawing back billions from the Fed. That position is at odds with what many legal experts and Democrats in Congress say was actually required under the law.

“This was a political decision — one intended to hamstring the incoming administration even as Covid deaths are spiking and the economic recovery is slowing,” Bharat Ramamurti, an appointed member of the Congressional Oversight Commission, said at Thursday’s hearing. “Let me put it this way: Does anyone think the Treasury would have ended these programs if Donald Trump were re-elected?”

Mr. Ramamurti, a Democrat, noted that Mr. Mnuchin’s decision was only made public after the election and that Treasury had earlier indicated that the programs could continue depending on market conditions.

On Nov. 19, Mr. Mnuchin declared that the he believed all along that the programs could not continue past year-end and asked the Federal Reserve to give back the unused investments.

Mr. Mnuchin was also grilled over Treasury’s decision to extend a loan to a trucking company that was struggling before the coronavirus.

Republicans on the commission, Senator Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania and Representative French Hill of Arkansas, both raised questions about why the company, YRC Worldwide, was worthy of loan that was justified on the grounds that the company was critical to national security.

“It’s been hanging on by a thread since the global financial crisis,” Mr. Hill said.

Mr. Toomey said that YRC, which had been contracted by the Defense Department to provide meal kits, protective equipment and other supplies to military bases, appeared to be nearly insolvent and asked whether giving it money was a prudent use of taxpayer funds.

Mr. Mnuchin, a former banker, agreed that he would not have underwritten the loan if he was still in private industry but said the law gave Treasury the ability to help prevent financial problems and job losses at companies deemed critical to national security.

There was a tremendous risk to the Deparment of Defense and a tremendous risk to the number of jobs,” Mr. Mnuchin said.

Lawmakers also pressed Mr. Mnuchin about one of YRC’s financial backers, Apollo Global Management, a private equity firm that also has ties to the White House.

Mr. Ramamurti asked Mr. Mnuchin if Jared Kushner, President Trump’s son-in-law and senior adviser, had encouraged him to approve the loan. In 2017, Apollo lent $184 million to Mr. Kushner’s family real estate firm, Kushner Companies, to refinance the mortgage on a Chicago skyscraper.

Mr. Mnuchin said that Mr. Kushner had no input and defended the loan, claiming that it staved off substantial job losses.

“I do think it would have been bankrupt and the company would have fired lots of people,” Mr. Mnuchin said.

Pandemic Unemployment

Assistance claims

Pandemic Unemployment

Assistance claims

Applications for jobless benefits resumed their upward march last week as the worsening pandemic continued to take a toll on the economy.

More than 947,000 workers filed new claims for state unemployment benefits last week, the Labor Department said Thursday. That was up nearly 229,000 from the week before, reversing a one-week dip that many economists attributed to the Thanksgiving holiday. Applications have now risen three times in the last four weeks, and are up nearly a quarter-million since the first week of November.

On a seasonally adjusted basis, the week’s figure was 853,000, an increase of 137,000.

Nearly 428,000 applied for Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, a federal program that covers freelancers, self-employed workers and others who don’t qualify for regular state benefits.

Unemployment filings have fallen greatly since last spring, when as many as six million people a week applied for state benefits. But progress had stalled even before the recent increases, and with Covid-19 cases soaring and states reimposing restrictions on consumers and businesses, economists fear that layoffs could surge again.

“It’s very clear the third wave of the pandemic is causing businesses to have to lay people off and consumers to cut back spending,” said Daniel Zhao, senior economist for the career site Glassdoor. “It seems like we’re in for a rough winter economically.”

Jobless claims rose in nearly every state last week. In California, where the state has imposed strict new limits on many businesses, applications jumped by 47,000, more than reversing the state’s Thanksgiving-week decline.

The monthly jobs report released on Friday showed that hiring slowed sharply in early November and that some of the sectors most exposed to the pandemic, like restaurants and retailers, cut jobs for the first time since the spring. More up-to-date data from private sources suggests that the slowdown has continued or deepened since the November survey was conducted.

“Every month, we’re just seeing the pace of the recovery get slower and slower,” said AnnElizabeth Konkel, an economist with the job site Indeed. Now, she said, the question is, “Are we actually going to see it slide backward?”

Many economists say the recovery will continue to slow if the government does not provide more aid to households and businesses. After months of gridlock in Washington, prospects for a new round of federal help have grown in recent days, with congressional leaders from both parties signaling their openness to a compromise and the White House proposing its own $916 billion spending plan on Tuesday. But the two sides remain far apart on key issues.

The stakes are particularly high for jobless workers depending on federal programs that have expanded and extended unemployment benefits during the pandemic. Those programs expire later this month, potentially leaving millions of families with no income during what epidemiologists warn could be some of the pandemic’s worst months.

Dara Khosrowshahi, Uber’s chief executive, said that drivers had served as a “lifeline” during the pandemic by delivering food and transporting health care workers.Credit…Jeenah Moon for The New York Times

Uber drivers and food delivery couriers should get priority access to the coronavirus vaccine, Dara Khosrowshahi, Uber’s chief executive, wrote in a letter to the governors of all 50 states.

Arguing that drivers had served as a “lifeline” during the pandemic by delivering food and transporting health care workers, Mr. Khosrowshahi said that they had earned a spot near the front of the vaccination line alongside other kinds of frontline workers.

“As you finalize your state-level allocation and distribution plans, I encourage you to recognize the essential nature of their work” Mr. Khosrowshahi wrote to the governors. “I want to ensure these individuals can receive immunizations quickly, easily and for free.”

He also offered to use Uber’s app to promote the vaccine and said Uber could be used to help people get to vaccination appointments.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recommended that health care workers who are at risk of contracting the virus and residents of long-term care facilities should be the first people to receive the vaccine.

Essential workers should be next, the C.D.C. suggested. But individual states have varied definitions of which workers meet the criteria. Uber drivers should be considered in that phase, Mr. Khosrowshahi said.

Volunteers prepare food for families in need in Newton Centre, Mass. Two federal unemployment programs are set to expire, potentially leaving millions vulnerable to eviction and hunger.Credit…Cody O’Loughlin for The New York Times

Millions of Americans will lose their only income in a few weeks if Congress doesn’t act soon to extend unemployment benefits.

Congress created two programs in the spring to expand the unemployment safety net: Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation, which offers 13 weeks of payments to people whose regular state benefits have run out, and Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, which is intended for people left out of the regular unemployment insurance system. But the week ending Dec. 26 is the last for which people can claim benefits under the programs.

Figuring out how many people stand to lose benefits is surprisingly difficult. Data from the Labor Department on Thursday showed that 4.5 million people were enrolled in the program to extend state benefits as of the third week of November. That was down slightly from a week earlier but had been rising quickly as people exhaust their regular benefits, which last six months in most states. If the program ends, some people will qualify for a separate federal extended benefits program, but that extension isn’t available in all states.

Pandemic Unemployment Assistance is even more complicated. The report on Thursday showed that 8.6 million people were enrolled, but that figure is almost certainly an overestimate. A recent report from the Government Accountability Office found that the program had been plagued by fraud and double counting, rendering the data unreliable.

By any accounting, however, millions stand to lose their income if the programs end. Many have already drawn down savings, leaving them with little financial cushion and putting them at risk of eviction or foreclosure.

“They’re going to be very quickly forced to make a lot of bad financial decisions to put food on the table,” said Andrew Stettner, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation, a progressive group. “It can be something you can’t recover from or that takes years to recover from.”

Outside the European Central Bank’s former headquarters, in Frankfurt. Credit…Yann Schreiber/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images

The European Central Bank administered another dose of stimulus to the eurozone economy on Thursday, as policymakers signaled that they expected the impact of the pandemic to linger into 2022 even as the rollout of vaccines begins.

The bank’s Governing Council, which met on Wednesday and Thursday, extended and enlarged programs intended to keep borrowing costs low for eurozone businesses and consumer.

The bank said it would increase pandemic-related bond buying — essentially a money-printing program — by 500 million euros, to a total of €1.85 trillion euros, or $2.2 trillion. The bank said it expected to continue the purchases at least until March 2022, nine months longer than planned.

The central bank also extended by a year, to June 2022, an initiative that allows commercial banks to borrow money at negative interest rates, provided the banks pass the credit on to their customers.

The decisions indicate that the European Central Bank’s Governing Council believes economic recovery is still months away, and extraordinary measures are needed to blunt the damage caused by the pandemic.

A second wave of coronavirus infections provoked a renewed economic downturn in the last quarter of this year, prompting the bank to take action, Christine Lagarde, the president of the European Central Bank, told reporters during a news conference.

The most recent analysis by central bank economists suggests “a more pronounced near-term impact of the pandemic on the economy and a more protracted weakness in inflation than previously envisaged,” Ms. Lagarde said.

The new burst of stimulus was not a surprise after Ms. Lagarde telegraphed policymakers’ intentions at a news conference in October, and repeated the message several times afterward. The only unknowns were what precise form the stimulus would take, and how big it would be.

The measures announced Thursday were in addition to 1.35 trillion newly created euros that the central bank had allocated to buy government and corporate bonds. The purchases are a way of pushing down market interest rates to keep borrowing costs low.

Since April, the central bank has also been lending to commercial banks at interest rates as low as minus 1 percent, in effect paying lenders to take the money as a way of pumping credit into the economy. The commercial banks must lend the money to their customers and meet other conditions to qualify.

United Airlines agreed to invest in a venture plans to build large plants where carbon will be captured from the air and stored underground.Credit…Jeff Chiu/Associated Press

United Airlines said on Thursday that it planned to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions to zero by 2050, in part by investing in capturing and storing carbon.

The airline said it had agreed to invest in 1PointFive, a joint venture between a subsidiary of Occidental Petroleum and Rusheen Capital Management, a private equity firm. That venture plans to build large plants in the United States where carbon will be captured from the air and permanently stored deep underground. Each plant will be designed to remove a million tons of carbon dioxide a year, or the equivalent of the carbon removed by about 40 million trees, according to the airline.

United is among a growing list of companies to promise to effectively eliminate their contribution to climate change. Airlines face a particularly difficult challenge because the technology to produce a zero-emission jet that can economically ferry hundreds of people over long distances does not yet exist and may not for decades.

Some experts and corporate leaders, including United’s chief executive, Scott Kirby, said the world would not be able to meet its climate goals without capturing carbon dioxide in the air and storing it in perpetuity. The approach is technically feasible, but it is expensive and has yet to be deployed on a large scale.

“Everyone that really wants to get the globe down to zero is going to have to come to grips with direct capture and sequestration because that is going to be the only way to get there by 2050,” Mr. Kirby told reporters on a call on Wednesday.

To meet its goal, United also plans to invest in the development and use of “sustainable fuel” and undertake other measures. American Airlines recently announced a similar pledge to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050, and Delta Air Lines said this year it would invest $1 billion to become the world’s “first” carbon neutral airline.

  • Stocks drifted between gains and losses on Thursday, as new data showed that unemployment claims jumped sharply in the United States last week, and the European Central Bank’s plans to expand stimulus measures fell short of what some traders were expecting.

  • The S&P 500 fell half a percent in early trading before recouping those losses. The Stoxx Europe 600 slipped about 0.8 percent, while the FTSE 100 index in Britain was flat after giving up its early gains.

  • The Labor Department said on Thursday that more than 947,000 workers filed new claims for state unemployment benefits last week, up nearly 229,000 from the week before. Applications have now risen three times in the last four weeks.

  • The report highlights the importance of a new economic stimulus plan to shore up households and businesses as the pandemic grinds on. Prospects for a new round of federal help have grown in recent days, with the White House proposing its own $916 billion spending plan on Tuesday. But lawmakers remain far apart on key issues.

  • The E.C.B., which has bought more than 600 billion euros’ worth of European bonds as part of an effort to keep government borrowing costs low, said on Thursday that it would increase its bond-buying plan by 500 billion euros and keep purchasing the debt until at least March 2022.

  • The pound fell against all other major currencies, losing 0.9 percent against the euro and 0.6 percent against the dollar, after Prime Minister Boris Johnson of Britain returned from Brussels without a breakthrough on Brexit trade talks with the European Union. The two sides have set a new deadline of Sunday to secure a deal.

  • On Wednesday, Britain signed trade agreements with Singapore and Vietnam. Britain has rushed to sign dozens of free-trade agreements with countries because on Jan. 1 it will be independent of the European Union customs union. The agreements essentially replicate the terms of the E.U. pacts with those countries.

Merck’s chief executive, Kenneth C. Frazier, will lead a workplace diversity effort called OneTen.Credit…Mike Cohen for The New York Times

Jarred by the death of George Floyd and the issues of racial injustice raised in its wake, the chief executives of three dozen companies are starting an initiative to provide a million jobs for Black workers in the next decade.

The effort, called OneTen, is led by Merck’s chief executive, Kenneth C. Frazier, and IBM’s executive chairman, Ginni Rometty. It includes leaders at 37 companies like American Express, AT&T, Bank of America, Cisco, Delta Air Lines, General Motors, Johnson & Johnson, Nike, Stryker, Target and Wal-Mart.

The companies hope to draw in a more diverse community of workers through a recruiting start-up that will identify potential job applicants with the help of community colleges, nonprofit groups, and other organizations known for cultivating Black talent.

Organizers said the jobs would have a wide range, from nurse practitioners to roles relying on specialized technology skills. The hope, they said, is to put more Black employees into better-paying, more secure jobs that will help sustain working families and provide better access to the upper echelons of corporations.

“The primary creator of wealth in the United States is the private sector,” Mr. Frazier said. “We can rebuild our country coming out of this pandemic. And if private companies decide that they’re going to hire, as we rebuild our economy, with an equity lens, then we’ll change the country.”

Mr. Frazier, one of only a few chief executives in the Fortune 500 who is Black, said the OneTen effort began after the killing of Mr. Floyd last May by a Minneapolis police officer. The event set off angry protests over racial inequities and “soul searching” in corporate America as well, Mr. Frazier said.

Talking with other chief executives, business organizations and Ms. Rometty, who has emphasized the importance of a diverse work force at IBM, Mr. Frazier said he came to believe that, as employers, their best tool for combating systemic racism was to attract new Black talent into well-paying jobs at their companies. Given that only about 22 percent of Black people over the age of 25 in the United States have attained a bachelor’s degree — a markedly lower percentage than white and Asian people — Mr. Frazier and Ms. Rometty said that drawing more Black talent would probably require dropping certain college-education requirements.

“As an employer, if I state that every job has to have a college degree, I am predetermining the outcome,” said Ms. Rometty. “The talent is out there; I must find another pathway for it to come to me.”

OneTen — the name refers to hiring one million workers in 10 years — is set to begin its work in January. A chief executive has not yet been named.

Dr. Vivek H. Murthy advised the N.C.A.A. Board of Governors in the early days of the coronavirus pandemic.Credit…Hilary Swift for The New York Times

President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s choice for surgeon general, Dr. Vivek H. Murthy, had a central role in the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s decision in March to cancel this year’s national basketball tournaments — one of the earliest and most culturally significant signs that the virus would upend ordinary life in America.

The work of Dr. Murthy, a member of the association’s powerful Board of Governors who was surgeon general during part of the Obama administration, offers a view into how he approached the pandemic’s initial threat in the United States, and how he might help shape the federal government’s response under Mr. Biden.

A newcomer to the insular world of college athletics, Dr. Murthy proved a cautious, deliberate expert who was wary of making drastic decisions prematurely, interviews with more than a dozen people who participated in the N.C.A.A.’s meetings suggest. But they said that as the tournaments approached and more data and scientific research emerged, Dr. Murthy was a forceful and effective champion of measures that had been unthinkable to most of society only days or weeks earlier.

Indeed, it was Dr. Murthy who urgently told board members that they risked fueling a deadly crisis if they allowed the tournaments to proceed as scheduled.

“He was instrumental in convincing the board that the time to act was now,” said Kenneth I. Chenault, a former chairman of American Express who sits on the N.C.A.A. board.

But board members like Mr. Chenault said that it was plain that Dr. Murthy understood the cultural and financial repercussions of a decision like canceling the basketball tournaments, which generate hundreds of millions of dollars.

  • The Trump administration announced Wednesday that it was filing a challenge to measures that Canada uses to protect its dairy market, the first enforcement action taken under a new trade agreement that the countries agreed to last year. Under the terms of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, which replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement this year, the United States and Canada will now enter consultations, and if the issue isn’t resolved the United States can request a special panel be formed to examine the matter.

  • Starbucks announced on Wednesday that Mellody Hobson will be the next non-executive chair of the company’s board, as the coffee chain moves closer to its goal of increasing diversity among its leadership. One of the most senior Black women in finance, Ms. Hobson has served on the board for 15 years and will step into the new role in March. She will replace Myron Ullman III, who has served as chair since 2018 and is retiring.