Categories
World News

Home of Representatives Reimposes Masks Mandate in Its Chamber

The House of Representatives will once again require all lawmakers and staff to wear masks inside, a sharp turnaround in policy as mounting fears about the Delta variant hit the front door of Congress. Senators are also encouraged to mask themselves, but are not required to do so.

In a memo late Tuesday night, Dr. Brian P. Monahan, Chief Medical Officer in Congress, he is recommending the change based on new CDC guidelines and the nature of the Capitol, which is mingling with thousands of people from across the country every week.

“For the congress, which is a collection of people who travel weekly from different risk areas (both high and low rates of disease transmission), everyone should wear a well-fitting medical filter mask (e.g. a KN95 mask) when they are are located in an interior, ”wrote Dr. Monahan to officials of the house.

In a letter to the senior senate leaders, Dr. Monahan gave the same advice but held no recommendation for a mask mandate. The Senate is a smaller body, and during much of the pandemic, its members voluntarily wore masks. Most of the senators are vaccinated.

Six weeks ago, the house triumphantly dropped its longstanding mask requirement to show optimism that the grip of the pandemic is loosening. Since then, at least one House MP and an assistant to Spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi have tested positive for the coronavirus after being fully vaccinated, and others on Capitol Hill have gone into voluntary quarantine after exposing people infected with Covid-19. At the same time, new cases have skyrocketed across the country.

Like wider mask policies by the CDC and aggressive interventions President Biden is considering to increase the country’s vaccination rate, the new mask mandate in the House of Representatives is likely to test the patience of a weary public and the Republican opposition party eager to Raise charges against Democrats who undermine confidence in vaccines and put the health of the recovering economy at risk. The Republicans in the House of Representatives immediately protested, with the prospect that they might refuse to comply.

“Make no mistake – the threat to return masks is not a science-based decision, but a decision conjured up by Liberal government officials who want to continue living in an eternal pandemic state,” said Rep Kevin McCarthy, Republican of California and the minority leader, wrote on twitter.

House rules state that any lawmaker who does not wear a mask in certain rooms of the Capitol Complex can be fined $ 500 or more. Several Republicans were fined for this reason earlier this year. However, it is unclear what Ms. Pelosi and other House leaders would do if many Republican members refused to participate. Democrats have been far more forgiving in the past, and many have resumed voluntarily wearing masks in the past few days.

Categories
Politics

U.S. Chamber of Commerce rips $300 jobless profit, requires repeal

A help call sign is posted on a taco stand in Solana Beach, California.

Mike Blake | Reuters

The largest corporate lobby group in America on Friday accused $ 300 a week of unemployment benefits for tricking Americans into staying home and April’s far weaker-than-expected job report.

“The disappointing employment report makes it clear that the pay of people who do not work is dampening the stronger labor market,” said the US Chamber of Commerce in the hours after the Labor Department published its April 2021 employment report.

“One step that policymakers should take now is to end the additional $ 300 weekly unemployment benefit,” added the lobby group. “Based on the Chamber’s analysis, the $ 300 benefit means that roughly one in four recipients takes home more unemployment than they earned.”

A chamber spokesman confirmed to CNBC that it will use similar messages to lobby the White House and Capitol Hill to end the payout.

The group’s attack on federal unemployment benefits came hours after the Labor Department reported that total non-farm employment rose by 266,000 last month, well below the 1 million Dow Jones polled economists expected.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

The Biden government has pushed back arguments like those of the Chamber. Labor Secretary Marty Walsh, who appeared on CNBC Friday, dismissed arguments from Republicans and corporate groups that the increased unemployment benefits are encouraging potential workers to stay home.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen also waved such criticisms, telling reporters Friday afternoon that she disagreed that the unemployment benefit increase “is really the factor that makes a difference”.

“When you look at states or sectors or workers, if it is really the added benefits that are hindering hiring, expect it to be either in states or for workers in or sectors where the replacement rate is due [unemployment insurance] is very high – you would expect the placement rates to be lower, “she said.” In fact, you see exactly the opposite. “

Minnesota-born Democrat Ilhan Omar was cynical about the Chamber’s criticism of the $ 300 weekly benefit.

For much of the past year, millions of unemployed Americans have qualified for special federal unemployment benefits to replace income lost from layoffs during the Covid-19 pandemic.

The first such federal unemployment benefit began under former President Donald Trump in March 2020 when he signed the CARES bill. This law gave unemployed Americans a weekly allowance of $ 600, which in many cases was a higher income than workers received while working full-time.

Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Countered that companies should pay higher wages to their workers instead.

President Joe Biden’s US $ 1.9 trillion bailout plan, which went into effect in March, provides unemployment benefits of $ 300 per week. Without additional government intervention, this benefit will expire at the beginning of September.

Some economists and many Republicans have accused the benefit of deterring Americans from returning to the jobs they held before the pandemic.

For example, South Carolina governor Henry McMaster earlier this week ordered the state’s Department of Employment and Labor to withdraw from the federal government’s pandemic programs by the end of June.

“This labor shortage is caused in large part by the additional unemployment benefits that the federal government is providing applicants with on top of their state unemployment benefits,” McMaster said in a press release Thursday.

“What was meant to be short-term financial assistance to vulnerable and displaced people during the height of the pandemic has become a dangerous federal claim that encourages and pays workers to stay at home rather than encourage them to return to work. ” he added.