Categories
Business

Frustrations Boil at Tempo of Vaccinations at Lengthy-Time period Care Amenities

In mid-December, a top Trump administration official floated an enticing possibility: All nursing home residents in the United States could be vaccinated against the coronavirus by Christmas. “It’s really a remarkable, remarkable prospect,” Alex M. Azar II, the secretary of health and human services, declared.

It turned out to be a fantasy.

A month later, vaccinations of some of the country’s most vulnerable citizens are going more slowly than many state officials, industry executives and families expected. Their hopes had been buoyed when government officials said long-term care facilities would be at the front of the line for vaccines.

CVS and Walgreens, which are largely responsible for vaccinating residents and workers in long-term care facilities, are on track to make at least initial vaccination visits to nearly all nursing homes they are working with by Jan. 25. The two pharmacy chains have already given out more than 1.7 million vaccine doses at long-term care facilities.

But the progress is uneven across the country and not nearly as comprehensive for different types of long-term care. For example, thousands of assisted living facilities — for older people who need less care than those in nursing homes — do not yet even have an appointment for their first visit from the pharmacy teams, in large part because states have given such facilities lower priority in their vaccine-distribution plans.

“I’ve had facilities call me, and I’ve had people cry, I’ve had people curse, because this was the first sign of hope that they’ve had in many, many months,” said Betsy Johnson, who leads a group that represents Kentucky’s nursing homes and assisted living facilities.

“It’s just human nature to think, ‘OK, but I was supposed to be first — and I don’t even know when my clinic is going to happen,’” Ms. Johnson said.

In Pennsylvania, teams from CVS or Walgreens are not scheduled to visit some nursing homes until February, and the vast majority of the state’s assisted living facilities have not yet been scheduled for a first visit, said Zach Shamberg, president of the Pennsylvania Health Care Association.

“There’s a great deal of frustration, there’s a great deal of apprehension, as to when or if this vaccine will come,” Mr. Shamberg said.

The pace of the vaccination program has taken on greater urgency as the rapidly spreading virus continues to decimate nursing homes and similar facilities. The virus’s surge since November has killed about 30,000 long-term care staff and residents, raising the total of virus-related deaths in these facilities to at least 136,000, according to a New York Times tracker. Since the pandemic began, long-term care facilities have accounted for just 5 percent of coronavirus cases but 36 percent of virus-related deaths.

Even as the vaccination campaign accelerates, the suffering is unlikely to wane. The coming months could be “the deadliest of the pandemic” for people living and working in long-term care, according to an analysis released on Thursday by the Kaiser Family Foundation.

The Trump administration announced in October that it had teamed up with CVS and Walgreens to lead a federal effort to vaccinate residents and workers at long-term care facilities, among the first eligible groups.

On Friday, CVS said it had given out just over one million doses in more than 12,000 initial visits to long-term care facilities. Nearly 8,000 visits are scheduled for the coming week. Walgreens said it had given out nearly 750,000 doses in nearly 9,000 visits to facilities, mostly nursing homes. The number of visits that Walgreens has scheduled with assisted living facilities “continues to accelerate,” a company spokeswoman, Rebekah Pajak, said.

The vaccinations by CVS and Walgreens were always expected to take several months because of the need to visit tens of thousands of facilities three times. The first two visits are for most residents and staff to get the two doses of the vaccine, with the third visit as a backup for people who missed the first clinic.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine?

While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.

When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated?

Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.

If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask?

Yes, but not forever. The two vaccines that will potentially get authorized this month clearly protect people from getting sick with Covid-19. But the clinical trials that delivered these results were not designed to determine whether vaccinated people could still spread the coronavirus without developing symptoms. That remains a possibility. We know that people who are naturally infected by the coronavirus can spread it while they’re not experiencing any cough or other symptoms. Researchers will be intensely studying this question as the vaccines roll out. In the meantime, even vaccinated people will need to think of themselves as possible spreaders.

Will it hurt? What are the side effects?

The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection won’t be any different from ones you’ve gotten before. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. But some of them have felt short-lived discomfort, including aches and flu-like symptoms that typically last a day. It’s possible that people may need to plan to take a day off work or school after the second shot. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign: they are the result of your own immune system encountering the vaccine and mounting a potent response that will provide long-lasting immunity.

Will mRNA vaccines change my genes?

No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

The idea that all nursing home residents could get their first doses by Christmas was not a realistic prospect even when Mr. Azar, the health secretary, floated it 12 days before the holiday. By that point, some states had told the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention that they would not activate the federal program to vaccinate their nursing homes until Dec. 28. The logistics would have been challenging even if states had put a priority on getting their first doses to nursing homes.

Michael Pratt, a spokesman for the Health and Human Services Department, said Mr. Azar had been speaking only aspirationally about what states were capable of doing, since they had enough vaccine doses to cover all nursing home residents by Christmas. But that would have required that states place less of a priority on vaccinating high-risk groups like heath care workers.

T.J. Crawford, a spokesman for CVS, said the chain was making first visits to all facilities within four weeks of each state’s activating its vaccination program for nursing homes or assisted living facilities.

“This isn’t a drive-through or stadium vaccination effort,” Mr. Crawford said. “We’re visiting more than 40,000 facilities with an average of less than 100 residents, in some cases going room to room.” He said CVS was “on track and delivering on goals established and communicated early in the process.”

But a growing number of governors and state health officials have voiced frustration with CVS’s and Walgreens’ speed.

In Mississippi, some long-term facilities won’t get their first visit until Feb. 11, the state health officer, Dr. Thomas Dobbs, said this month. “We’re clearly disappointed with the progress in the long-term care program,” he said.

Some states and cities are exploring ways to hasten the inoculations.

Seattle is using its Fire Department to vaccinate nearly 1,000 residents and staff at adult family homes, a type of long-term care, by the end of January. Florida hired an emergency services company, CDR Maguire, to give out doses at 1,900 assisted living facilities that had not been scheduled for visits by CVS and Walgreens teams before Jan. 24.

In Michigan, officials have asked the federal government to let them work with other pharmacies, such as the supermarket chains Meijer and Kroger, to speed up the vaccination effort in long-term care facilities, said Bobby Leddy, a spokesman for Gov. Gretchen Whitmer.

West Virginia is the only state that has not activated the federal program involving CVS and Walgreens, though Walgreens is separately working with West Virginia to vaccinate 32 of its long-term care facilities. Relying mostly on local independent pharmacies, the state said on Dec. 30 that it had wrapped up the first round at its 214 long-term care facilities.

Some of the initially feared problems that could slow down the vaccine rollout in nursing homes have not emerged as serious obstacles, at least so far, according to facility operators and industry researchers.

Despite widespread worries that the vaccines’ side effects — which can include fevers, chills and fatigue — would cause staff to miss work and residents to need more care, that has not happened to any significant degree. And while there was early confusion about how nursing homes should get consent from residents or their families, that process has largely gone smoothly.

But other things are slowing the campaign. A significant number of long-term care workers have balked at receiving the vaccine. The virus’s spread is also delaying the process. People should not be vaccinated while they still have Covid-19 symptoms or are isolating, according to the C.D.C.

Outbreaks and cases of Covid-19 in some long-term care communities have led Walgreens to delay scheduling initial visits or to reschedule them, said Rick Gates, an executive leading the company’s long-term care vaccinations.

CVS has encountered the same issue, though it has not been widespread. The company has left the decision about whether to proceed with visits in such cases to local clinic team leaders and officials at the facilities, Mr. Crawford said.

Another factor is that some states did not quickly activate their programs to vaccinate people at assisted living facilities and similar communities. In some cases, they waited until weeks after they began vaccinations at nursing homes.

But many long-term care facilities include both nursing homes and assisted living. In those cases, pharmacy teams have been able to vaccinate only a subset of residents.

In Prairie du Chien, Wis., for example, a team from Walgreens on Thursday made its first visit to the local nursing home, Prairie Maison, to inject nearly all of its roughly 50 residents with the Moderna vaccine.

But Prairie Maison is part of a larger senior community, which includes about 50 assisted living residents. Because Wisconsin did not activate its vaccination program for assisted living until Friday, those residents weren’t offered the vaccine — even though they are in the same building as the nursing home residents.

“Vaccinating one group and not the other doesn’t make a lot of sense,” said Dr. Mark Grunwald, the chairman of Prairie Maison’s board.

Abby Goodnough contributed reporting.

Categories
Health

UnitedHealthcare launches digital major look after employer plans

This arranged photo shows a UnitedHealth Group health insurance card in a wallet in this image illustration dated October 14, 2019.

Lucy Nicholson | Reuters

UnitedHealthcare is expanding its telemedicine offering for employers to include a new virtual basic care service that gives doctors access to routine visits on their phones or computers who pay little or no co-payments.

“Before Covid, we worked with big primary care practices … and it was really difficult to get an admission. Patients wanted it, but doctors were really uncomfortable with the whole idea of ​​virtually seeing patients,” said Dr. Donna O’Shea, Chief Medical Officer, Population Health Management at UnitedHealthcare, the health insurance arm of the UnitedHealth Group.

Doctors have been slow to introduce telemedicine, as the reimbursement rates for virtual visits were often lower than for personal care. That has changed because of Covid. Government Medicare’s plans for seniors and private health insurers increased reimbursement rates during the pandemic last year, and inevitably increased adoption of virtual care by doctors and patients.

Now UnitedHealth is betting that patients are ready to take the next step towards a more convenient option.

“We know 25% of people don’t have a basic provider … maybe it’s really difficult to get out of work (to see one) and maybe if it were easier for you, you might have one,” said O’Shea .

The pandemic has also fueled the race to enter virtual basic services. Telemedicine provider Teladoc Health has tried to move beyond one-time urgent care visits to a basic care model for employers. So is Amazon, which is exploring the expansion of its in-house Amazon Care virtual health program for Washington state workers to include a service for other employers.

While non-traditional companies like Amazon can bring expertise to consumer engagement, that is not enough to gain a foothold with employers, said Steven Shill, national director of the BDO Center for Healthcare Excellence & Innovation.

“There must be complementary skills and part of the complementary skills must be healthcare,” Shill said, adding that half of the healthcare executives surveyed by BDO plan to consider new partnerships this year.

“I think these partnerships will come and go until you have the right partners together,” he said.

UnitedHealth is working with telehealth provider Amwell, who will provide the platform for virtual care and clinical services through its medical group. The virtual primary care program will initially be available to employers in 11 states, including Colorado, Texas, Maryland and Washington, DC.

Editor’s Note: This story has been updated to reflect that Donna O’Shea is the Chief Medical Officer for Population Health Management at UnitedHealthcare, the health insurance arm of the UnitedHealth Group.

Categories
Health

Well being Care Employee Had Critical Allergic Response After Pfizer’s Covid Vaccine

WASHINGTON – Two health care workers at the same Alaska hospital developed reactions just minutes after receiving the coronavirus vaccine from Pfizer this week, including a worker who was supposed to stay in the hospital until Thursday.

Health officials said the cases would not disrupt their plans to launch vaccines and that they would share the information for the sake of transparency.

The first worker, a middle-aged woman with no history of allergies, had an anaphylactic reaction that began 10 minutes after receiving the vaccine at the Bartlett Regional Hospital in Juneau on Tuesday, a hospital official said. She had a rash over her face and trunk, shortness of breath, and an increased heart rate.

Dr. Lindy Jones, the hospital’s emergency room medical director, said the worker was first given a shot of adrenaline, a standard treatment for severe allergic reactions. Her symptoms subsided, but then came back and she was treated with steroids and an adrenaline drop.

When the doctors tried to stop the drip, her symptoms reappeared, so the woman was taken to the intensive care unit, which was observed all night, and then taken off the drip early Wednesday morning, Dr. Jones.

Dr. Jones had said earlier Wednesday that the woman should be discharged that evening, but the hospital said late Wednesday that she would be staying one more night.

The second worker received his shot Wednesday and developed eye swelling, lightheadedness and a sore throat 10 minutes after the injection, the hospital said in a statement. He was taken to the emergency room and treated with adrenaline, Pepcid, and Benadryl, though the hospital said the reaction wasn’t anaphylaxis. The worker was back to normal within an hour and was released.

The hospital, which had given a total of 144 doses on Wednesday night, said both workers didn’t want their experience to negatively impact others who line up for the vaccine.

“We have no plans to change our vaccination schedule, dosage, or treatment regimen,” said Dr. Anne Zink, Alaska’s chief medical officer, in a statement.

Although the Pfizer vaccine was shown to be safe and 95 percent effective in a clinical trial of 44,000 participants, the Alaska cases are likely to heighten concerns about possible side effects. Experts said developments could lead to calls for stricter guidelines to ensure recipients were carefully monitored for side effects.

Dr. Paul A. Offit, a vaccine expert and a member of an outside advisory panel that recommended the Food and Drug Administration approve Pfizer’s emergency vaccine, said the appropriate precautions have already been taken. For example, he said, requiring recipients to remain in place for 15 minutes after receiving the vaccine helped ensure that the woman was treated quickly.

“I don’t think this means we should take a break,” he said. “Not at all.” But he said the researchers need to find out “which component of the vaccine is causing this response”.

Dr. Jay Butler, a leading infectious disease expert with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, said the situation in Alaska showed that the surveillance system was working. The agency has recommended that the vaccine be given in environments where oxygen and adrenaline are available to treat anaphylactic reactions.

Millions of Americans are expected to be vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine by the end of the year. As of Wednesday evening, it was unclear how many Americans had received it so far. Alex M. Azar II, the secretary for health and human services, said his department would release these data “several days or maybe a week later.”

The Alaska woman’s response was believed to be similar to the anaphylactic reactions two health workers in the UK had after receiving the Pfizer BioNTech vaccine last week. How they both recovered.

These cases are expected to occur Thursday, when FDA scientists are due to meet with the agency’s external panel of experts to decide whether regulators should recommend Moderna’s Covid-19 vaccine for the emergency.

Although the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines are based on the same technology and are similar in their ingredients, it is not clear whether an allergic reaction to one vaccine would occur with the other. Both are made up of genetic material called mRNA, which is trapped in a bubble of oily molecules called lipids, although they use different combinations of lipids.

Dr. Offit said the bladders in both vaccines are coated with a stabilizing molecule called polyethylene glycol, which he saw as a “prime candidate” for causing an allergic reaction. He stressed that further research was needed.

Pfizer’s study did not identify serious adverse events from the vaccine, although many participants experienced pain, fever, and other side effects. The Alaskan reactions were thought to be related to the vaccine because they came on so quickly after the shot.

A Pfizer spokeswoman, Jerica Pitts, said the company doesn’t have all the details of the Alaska situation but is working with local health officials. The vaccine contains information that indicates that medical treatment should be available in the event of a rare anaphylactic event, she said. “We will closely monitor any reports suggestive of serious post-vaccination allergic reactions and update the labeling language as necessary,” said Ms. Pitts.

After workers in the UK fell ill, authorities there warned against giving the vaccines to anyone with a history of severe allergic reactions. They later clarified their concerns and changed the wording of “severe allergic reactions” to mean that the vaccine should not be given to anyone who has ever had an anaphylactic reaction to a food, medicine, or vaccine. That type of response to a vaccine is “very rare,” they said.

Pfizer officials said the two Britons who had the reaction had severe allergies in the past. A 49-year-old woman has had egg allergies in the past. The other, a 40-year-old woman, had a history of allergies to several drugs. Both wore EpiPen-like devices to inject adrenaline in the event of such a reaction.

Pfizer has said that its vaccine does not contain egg ingredients.

The UK update also said a third patient had a “possible allergic reaction” but did not describe it.

In the United States, federal regulators on Friday gave adults ages 16 and older full approval for the vaccine. Healthcare providers have been warned not to give the vaccine to anyone with a “known history of a severe allergic reaction” to any component of the vaccine. This is a standard warning for vaccines.

Due to the UK cases, FDA officials have announced that they will require Pfizer to step up surveillance for anaphylaxis and provide data on it once the vaccine continues to be used. Pfizer also said that it was recommended that the vaccine be given in environments with access to anaphylaxis treatment equipment. Last weekend, the CDC said people with severe allergies could be safely vaccinated, with close monitoring 30 minutes after receiving the shot.

Anaphylaxis can be life-threatening, with difficulty breathing and drops in blood pressure that usually occur within minutes or even seconds of contact with a food or drug or even a substance such as latex that the person is allergic to.

Carl Zimmer contributed to the reporting.

Categories
Health

Amid Pandemic, Scientists Reassess Routine Medical Care

Now the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, a federally funded research group, is prospectively collecting data during the pandemic from more than 800,000 women and nearly 100 mammography centers across the country.

Millions of women missed their regular mammograms in the first wave of the pandemic.

Before the pandemic, around 100,000 women had screening mammograms every day in the United States. In the spring, almost all mammography centers closed for three months, and although they reopened in the summer, almost all of them did not work normally until October. That may change as new coronavirus infections rise, but for now women who want mammograms can get them.

Clinics have had to slow the speed at which they perform mammograms due to the precautions taken by Covid-19, including physical removal and cleaning of equipment between exams. But they make up for the delays by keeping longer hours and opening on weekends.

The situation may be different for women with worrying findings, such as a lump or a suspicious finding on a mammogram. The wait for diagnostic imaging and biopsies can be long, stretching for weeks or months, said Dr. Christoph Lee, Professor of Radiology and Health Research at the University of Washington.

Doctors expect many women who missed their mammograms this past spring will not return because they can do the screening test again, some because they fell out of the habit, others because of the social and economic impact of the pandemic. Women may have to stay home to look after children or they may have lost their jobs and health insurance.

The Breast Cancer Consortium should have the first results of the screening shutdown’s impact on patient outcomes in six months, said Dr. Lee.

“We have never been able to argue to stop screening for a period of time as the standard of care is regular screening,” said Dr. Lee. “We’re trying to find out whether less screening leads to more or less harm.”

Categories
Health

The doubtless crushing toll of rationing well being care

Presbyterian Healthcare Services’ chief medical officer, Dr. Jason Mitchell told CNBC that doctors “do everything we can” to prevent rationing care when the governor of his state signed an executive order that brought New Mexico one step closer to rationed care – the place where the patient is sake Coronavirus to be treated.

“It’s really important to realize that the goal of introducing a nursing crisis standard is to expand services so we don’t have to ration,” said Mitchell. “Also, we’re going to use places that we don’t normally use, whether it’s tents or clinics, to put up hospital beds. We’re really going to do everything. That’s what we’re going to focus on and try to make everything so that you don’t . ” Come to this point. “

The Albuquerque doctor added that hospitals will bring in doctors and nurses who normally practice in clinics, as well as rotating doctors who normally do not work in intensive care units. The intensive care units in New Mexico reached 103% capacity, the highest in the country. 935 people are being hospitalized with Covid in New Mexico, with hospital admissions more than doubling in the last month, according to the Covid Tracking Project.

Mitchell said a group of doctors, nurses, ethicists, and academics are working on an equitable route to potential ration supplies to ensure that health care providers can provide as many resources as possible to as many people as possible.

“The other important thing is that we all do this together. So every health organization uses the same criteria, the same mechanisms to ensure that equity, to ensure that patients are distributed across the state and that we are providing as much care and savings as that many lives as possible, “Mitchell said in an interview on Tuesday night about” The News with Shepard Smith “.

The United States has exceeded more than 15 million confirmed coronavirus cases. In context, that means roughly one in 22 Americans has tested positive since the pandemic began. This is evident from a CNBC analysis of the Johns Hopkins data. Mitchell told Shepard Smith that while health care professionals are already exhausted, the toll that “not having what you need for every patient” may be oppressive.

Dr. Bruce Becker, associate professor of behavioral medicine and social sciences in the School of Public Health at Brown University, echoed Mitchell’s concerns about the policy of rationing care.

“The individual frontline health worker must execute the policy on a personal level and look a patient or family member in the eye and tell them that they do not meet certain policy criteria,” Becker said. “This shatters a person’s soul, it shatters their heart, piece by piece, and day by day, as they take on the brunt of the pain and suffering of the patient or family that has been condemned by politics not to do so . ” Receive everything that exists. ”