Categories
Business

Retail conglomerate Genuine Manufacturers Group readies for summer season IPO

People enter a Forever 21 store at a shopping mall in Montebello, California on September 30, 2019 a day after the fashion retailer filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.

Frederic J. Brown | AFP | Getty Images

The retail conglomerate Authentic Brands Group is preparing for an initial public offering that could come as soon as this summer, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Authentic Brands — which owns businesses including Juicy Couture, Brooks Brothers, Aeropostale and Forever 21 — is targeting a valuation of about $10 billion in its IPO, said the person, who requested anonymity because the discussions remain private. At $10 billion, that would mean Authentic Brands’ market value would surpass that of Under Armour, Kohl’s, Ralph Lauren and Dick’s Sporting Goods. However, the size of the deal could change since it isn’t finalized.

Authentic Brands was valued at more than $4 billion, inclusive of debt, when BlackRock invested in the business back in 2019.

The official registration statement for the public offering is expected to be filed by Authentic Brands in early July, the person said, and shares could begin trading by the end of that month.

A spokesperson from Authentic Brands declined to comment.

Since the company’s inception, Authentic Brands’ founder and CEO Jamie Salter has accumulated more than two dozen retail brands, including the bankrupt department store chain Barneys New York, Nautica and Nine West.

The business currently does more than $10 billion in retail sales annually, according to its website.

Authentic Brands’ strategy in recent years has entailed working with two of the biggest publicly traded mall owners in the United States, Simon Property Group and Brookfield Property Partners. The trio came together in 2016 to purchase the teen apparel retailer Aeropostale out of bankruptcy. They did it again with Forever 21 last year.

With Simon, Authentic Brands has separately created a joint-venture known as SPARC Group, which currently runs the operations of Brooks Brothers, Nautica, Aeropostale, Forever 21 and Lucky Brand.

Authentic Brands and SPARC recently announced they will be acquiring Eddie Bauer from the private-equity firm Golden Gate Capital.

In addition to BlackRock, Authentic Brands is backed by investors including General Atlantic and Leonard Green & Partners. BlackRock and General Atlantic declined to comment, while Leonard Green & Partners didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

“I’m in the first inning,” Salter told CNBC in an interview last year. “People are asking me, ‘Jamie. Mall-based retail? I don’t get it.’ … What I am going to say to you is, we need bricks and mortar. Retail really needs it.”

Bloomberg first reported on Authentic Brands’ plans to go public.

Categories
Business

Retailers’ variety pledges put extra Black-owned manufacturers on cabinets

Cora and Stefan Miller started a hair care company after they had their son, Kade, and struggled to find hair products for him. Young King Hair Care is now sold by Walmart and Target.

When Cora Miller had her son, she discovered the baby had a full head of hair — and found few products on the market to style it.

A lot of gels, mousses and creams smelled like fruit and flowers or came in pink bottles. That search inspired Cora Miller and her husband, Stefan, to start their own company, Young King Hair Care. They designed the line of plant-based, natural hair products with little Black boys like their son in mind, and launched the product just before his third birthday.

“I really wanted my son to see himself in the products he uses,” said Cora Miller, the company’s co-founder and CEO. “It was a bugging, nagging feeling about this that wouldn’t go away.”

Young King is now on the shelves of two of the country’s largest retailers, Walmart and Target. It is among the growing number of Black-owned brands that national retailers have begun to sell over the past year in a push to better reflect diverse customers and a commitment to advancing racial equity after the murder of George Floyd.

Companies have made pledges and earmarked donations over the past year. Yet the expanding assortment of Black-owned goods on national retailers’ shelves and websites has become one of the most visible signs of change in the corporate world.

Floyd’s murder one year ago Tuesday not only cast a harsh light on police treatment of Black Americans, said Americus Reed, a professor of marketing at the Wharton School. It led to a reckoning about how Black businesses have been boxed out of economic opportunities and reflected by offensive brands, such as Aunt Jemima or Uncle Ben’s.

By seeking more Black suppliers, retailers have combined “social change and economic savviness” and made a move that can boost companies’ reputations and sales, he said.

“It’s an investment,” he said. “It’s a long-term play to signal to a community that ‘We’ve got your back.'”

More space on shelves

Four days after Floyd’s murder, Aurora James challenged companies in an Instagram post.

“So many of your businesses are built on Black spending power,” she wrote. “So many of your stores are set up in Black communities. So many of your posts seen on Black feeds. This is the least you can do for us. We represent 15% of the population and we need to represent 15% of your shelf space.”

A year later, 25 companies — including prominent retailers like Macy’s, Sephora and Gap — have pledged to do that. James, a Black entrepreneur with a luxury brand called Brother Vellies, leads the 15 Percent Pledge.

James said she has seen progress made by the companies firsthand. A company that joins the pledge signs a contract with the nonprofit, which audits it each quarter. She said the nonprofit looks at its purchase orders and tracks representation of products on shelves. The group also shares resources, such as a database of Black-owned businesses and suggests strategies that companies can use to grow a diverse base of suppliers.

Beyond growing the number of products, retailers are becoming stronger and more supportive business partners, James said. For instance, she added, companies are not only reaching out to Black entrepreneurs who have historically been left out, but are guiding them through common challenges experienced by early-stage businesses. Examples she cited include assisting with package or logo design or paying deposits to businesses when orders are placed to provide upfront capital.

James recently met on Zoom with a group of entrepreneurs who are part of Sephora’s accelerator program. All were women and people of color who are developing makeup and skin-care products for women who look like them.

“Every day, I am hearing messages from Black-owned businesses that are scaling into these opportunities,” she said. “It’s a real game changer. … Ultimately, when we actually empower entrepreneurs, who are in many cases living and working in Black communities, that’s when we’re really going to start to see a big difference across this country,” she said.

Other retailers have announced similar commitments and new approaches.

Lowe’s had a “Shark Tank”-like competition to identify promising products from entrepreneurs of diverse backgrounds and reward them with shelf space, marketing support and small business grants. Ulta Beauty plans to spend more than $4 million on marketing to help Black-owned brands gain traction. Target is launching a new eight-week accelerator program for Black-led start-ups, Forward Founders, as part of a commitment to spend more than $2 billion with Black-owned businesses by the end of 2025. And Walmart featured some Black-owned beauty brands in a recent TikTok streaming event.

James has criticized some companies that have declined to take the 15 Percent Pledge, such as Target, saying its initiatives do not go far enough and don’t come with the same level of accountability.

“Whether or not Target wants to take the pledge or any of these other companies want to take the pledge, we’re still going to keep holding their feet to the fire and pushing them to do more,” she said.

Creamalicious Ice Creams founder Liz Rogers took her Southern roots into consideration when crafting her recipes.

Source: Bobby Quillard

Breaking in

Those efforts have already begun to help minority-owned brands get onto shelves.

Creamalicious Ice Creams, founded by the Black chef and restaurateur Liz Rogers, made its way into Walmart stores in February. Its pints arrived in the freezer aisle several months after Walmart CEO Doug McMillon sent a letter to employees last summer pledging to advance racial equality within its business.

“It’s very hard to get into the [ice cream] category because it’s extremely competitive, there’s no room on the shelves, … and when you’re new, they’re not very open to making room,” Rogers said. “As a minority business, breaking into the frozen dessert category, you have to be a lot more innovative. You have to have a brain and a story, and you have to speak different and stand on your own.”

Rogers said being authentic and true to her Southern roots is what ultimately helped her succeed. “People told me, ‘Don’t call Walmart because they’re going to say no.’ And I said, ‘Well they can say no.’ But they ended up saying yes. And now I’m trying to work with other retailers.”

Creamalicious’ flavors of ice cream, sold online and in some Meijer grocery stores, include “Slap Yo’ Momma Banana Pudding,” “Uncle Charles Brown Suga Bourbon Cake,” and “Porch Light Peach Cobbler.” All of them come with family recipes and draw on African American culture and childhood memories, Rogers said

“Doug McMillon didn’t just write a letter,” she said. “They welcomed me with open arms. … They taught me how to navigate through the system, and mentor me. They were very sincere in wanting me to win.”

Rebecca Allen launched in 2018 as a shoe for women of color who were struggling to find the right version of nude footwear for them.

Source: Rebecca Allen

A footwear brand that caters specifically to Black and Brown women, Rebecca Allen, debuted on Nordstrom’s website this week, and its styles will head to select Nordstrom stores later this year.

The department store announced last fall its goal to bring in $500 million in retail sales from brands owned, operated or designed by Black and/or Latinx individuals by 2025. It was one of a series of diversity and inclusion goals the company set last August. Separately, it committed to include more Black-owned beauty brands in the merchandise mix.

Nordstrom’s buying team has since received a flood of Instagram messages and emails from Black-owned businesses, said Teri Bariquit, its chief merchandising officer.

“There was this momentum and this call to action that gave a platform for more change, faster,” she said. “There has been a lot of very organic outreach directly to us. People see an open door, and we always take those calls.”

Allen, a former Goldman Sachs vice president, founded the company because of her own struggles when shoe shopping. The company’s assortment of heels, flats and sandals come in a wider range of shades, including those that match the skin tone of women of color.

Allen said retailers not only can put brands in front of consumers but can also reverse many years of Black businesses not getting access to the capital they needed to grow.

“It is certainly not enough just to say we’re going to bring these brands on. But it’s really: How are we supporting them to actually be successful, and how are we defining that success?” she said.

Allen has facilitated conversations among other Black-owned brands with Nordstrom to share stories of success and failure, and learn from each other, she said.

“For any of these companies, it’s not going to help anybody if they’re just saying, well, we did it, we hit this 15% quota — or whatever it is,” Allen said.

For so many Black entrepreneurs, just getting a call or email back from a buyer has often been a struggle, Young King’s Miller said. The company’s story shows how getting noticed by a national retailer “changes the trajectory of your company,” she said.

Young King began selling products online in 2019. Yet its business accelerated after its curling cream and conditioner got picked up by Target in January and at Walmart in March. Sales have approximately tripled from a year ago, she said. That has given the company runway to launch new styling products and enter a category outside of hair care, she said.

Target, for instance, mentored the company in its beauty accelerator. It also offered the company endcap displays at nearly 200 stores at a discounted price, she said.

She said she often walks the store aisles with her son, Kade, now 4. The couple has “paid it forward” by hiring other Black-owned businesses, including the manufacturer of the hair-care products and the fulfillment company that ships orders.

“It’s been a long time coming, to be honest,” she said. “It’s kind of crazy to think that there weren’t a lot products for Black or Brown people. There just wasn’t. And so I always get so excited to learn and see other emerging Black-owned brands and see them filling in spaces and gaps.”

Categories
Business

L Manufacturers (LB) Q1 2021 earnings beat

Shoppers walk past a Victoria’s Secret store in a mall in San Diego, Calif., On April 22, 2021.

Bing Guan | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Victoria’s secret parent company L Brands reported first-quarter earnings and sales that beat analysts’ estimates on Wednesday.

The stock recently fell more than 1% in extended trading.

Here’s how the company performed for the quarter ended May 1, compared to analyst expectations based on a refinitive survey:

  • Earnings per share: $ 1.25 adjusted versus $ 1.21 expected
  • Revenue: $ 3.02 billion versus $ 3.01 billion expected

Net income rose to $ 276.6 million, or 97 cents per share, compared to a loss of $ 296.9 million, or $ 1.07 per share, last year. With no one-time expense, L Brands earned $ 1.25 per share, beating analysts’ forecast $ 1.21.

Total revenue increased more than 80% from $ 1.65 billion a year ago to $ 3.02 billion. That surpassed the estimates for $ 3.01 billion.

Total revenue in the same store increased 21% year over year, compared to a 4% increase in the same period last year.

At Victoria’s Secret, sales in the same store rose 25%, compared to a 15% decrease last year. Sales in the same store at Bath & Body Works rose 16%, compared to a 41% increase last year when many consumers stocked up on hand sanitizer at the start of the Covid pandemic.

According to L Brands, sales increased during the quarter thanks to stimulus checks and relaxed pandemic restrictions in stores. While it’s difficult to quantify the exact benefits of government incentives, the company estimated that the payouts increased sales by about $ 125 million – a benefit of $ 50 million at Bath & Body Works and $ 75 million at Victoria’s Secret.

The company had previously announced its first quarter expectations and raised them several times, citing the continued increased momentum of its lingerie brand Victoria’s Secret.

Management said in prepared notes released Wednesday that customers at Victoria’s Secret have responded “positively” to new merchandise, including marketing of its first-ever Mother’s Day campaign with a pregnant model.

“We are starting to tell the story of our repositioning of our brand through our marketing,” said the company.

Victoria’s Secret has long had a dominant market share in the lingerie industry but fell out of favor due to its overtly sexy marketing that avoided certain body types. That marketing message wasn’t working for many women and they had started shopping at other brands like American Eagle’s Aerie that included inclusivity and convenience. Victoria’s Secret had to spin to meet their needs.

By the fall, L Brands will spin off its Victoria’s Secret business into its own publicly traded company and said it would not make a forecast for the rest of the year.

The company also appointed the new CFOs for the two new companies. Wendy Arlin, currently Senior Vice President Finance and Controller at L Brands, will become CFO of Bath & Body Works. Former Big Lots CFO Tim Johnson becomes Victoria’s secret CFO.

For the second quarter, L Brands is calling for adjusted earnings per share in a range of 80 cents to $ 1. According to Refinitiv, analysts were looking for 76 cents per share.

It is forecast that Q2 sales will increase between 10% and 15% compared to 2019.

According to L Brands, the split will allow both brands to focus more on growth and have greater financial flexibility to adapt to a changing retail landscape. It had either considered a spin-off or a sale, but said the spin-off was the best option for the company to achieve the highest value.

At the close of trading on Wednesday, L Brands shares were up around 82% since the start of the year. The company has a market capitalization of $ 18.8 billion.

The full press release from L Brands can be found here.

Categories
Business

Constellation Manufacturers takes stake in Black-owned rosé producer La Fête du Rosé

After Constellation Brands agreed to invest in minority companies, Constellation Brands took its first step and acquired a stake in a black-owned rosé company.

Constellation is now backing La Fête du Rosé through its venture capital arm to support black Latin American and minority-owned companies with $ 100 million through 2030.

The company’s goal is to increase the reach of rosé, which is popular with women, Donae Burston, founder of La Fête du Rosé, told CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Friday.

“It has been our mission since day 1 to make rosé much more inclusive,” he said in an interview about “Mad Money”. “We definitely wanted to change that narrative and bring more people into the group, not just men, but people with color too.”

La Fête du Rosé – French for “the rosé party” – was launched in 2019 by Donae Burston, a 15-year veteran of the beverage industry who developed the brand for Millennial and Generation Z consumers. The drink is inspired by the rosé culture on the French peninsula of Saint Tropez.

While the size of the investment was not disclosed, Burston said the funds will be used to expand staff and production.

Burston appeared alongside Bill Newlands, CEO of Constellation Brands, who said his company had been encouraged to act to counter the fact that women and people of color are underrepresented in the industry. Constellation Brands’ wine and spirits portfolio includes Corona and Modelo.

“In the last five years, only 1% of venture funds went to black entrepreneurs, and we decided to fix that and really make a difference,” Newlands said. “We believe you can do good and do good business.”

La Fête du Rosé also donates part of its profits to programs that provide travel experiences to disadvantaged children.

“Travel was what changed my life after I graduated, so we wanted to give equal opportunities back to underserved youth and disadvantaged children,” said Burston.

Categories
Business

Newell Manufacturers CEO Ravi Saligram says residence will stay the hub post-Covid

Even if students return to school and workers return to the office, changes in consumer spending will survive the pandemic.

“The house has become the center,” Ravi Saligram, CEO of Newell Brands, told CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” on Monday.

As companies become more flexible and their employees work remotely in a post-pandemic world, Saligram expects the increase in sales to continue longer than this year.

“We believe some of these trends are going to continue and we’re pretty innovative,” he said. “We believe that we will continue to grow in the future.”

The owner of brands like Papermate, Rubbermaid and Sharpie reported better-than-expected earnings and sales on Friday that rose 21% year over year to $ 2.29 billion.

“All eight of our companies have done well and grown. And seven out of eight companies grew double-digit worldwide,” said Saligram.

Newell raised his forecast for this year, citing students returning to school in person as a factor that contributed to his optimistic outlook.

“We had a feeling with our forecasts that we would do better than 2019, and much of it has to do with the continuation of consumer trends,” said Saligram. “A big part of [the positive outlook] is that we believe that most of the students will be back in school. We’re going to have a normal back to school season and that’s a big factor for us. “

Newell estimates that adjusted earnings will be between $ 1.63 and $ 1.73 per share this year. Revenue is expected to grow between $ 9.9 billion and $ 10.1 billion.

Newell Brands shares rose nearly 2% on Monday. The stock is up nearly 29% that year, valued at more than $ 11.7 billion.

Categories
World News

Chinese language T.V. Exhibits Censor Western Clothes Manufacturers

HONG KONG – Viewers of some of China’s most popular online variety shows were recently greeted by an odd sight: a blur of pixels obscuring the marks on sneakers and t-shirts worn by attendees.

As far as the audience could tell, the clothing showed no signs of profanity or indecency. Instead, the problem was with the overseas brands that made them.

Since late March, streaming platforms in China have been carefully censoring the logos and symbols of brands like Adidas that adorn items worn by participants performing dance, singing, and stand-up comedy routines. The phenomenon followed a feud between the government and well-known international companies that said they would avoid using cotton from western China’s Xinjiang region, where authorities are accused of having launched a widespread campaign of repression against ethnic minorities, including Uyghurs.

While the anger in China against Western brands has been palpable and lingering on social media, the sight of cast members transforming into fast-moving patches of censored shoes and clothing has a rare, if unintentional, view for Chinese viewers in a heated global argument Comic relief brought. It has also exposed the unexpected political trip wires that non-political entertainment platforms face as the government continues to armed Chinese consumers in their political clashes with the West.

Most of the brands were undetectable, but some could be identified. Chinese brands didn’t seem blurry. It is not clear whether Chinese government officials specifically ordered the shows to disguise the brands. However, experts said the video streaming sites appeared to feel pressured or obliged to publicly distance themselves from Western brands amid the feud.

Ying Zhu, a media professor at the City University of New York and Hong Kong Baptist University, suggested that the censorship was a response to both state and grassroots patriotism, especially as the opinions of nationalist viewers became more prominent and louder.

“The pressure is both top-down and bottom-up,” said Professor Zhu. “It is not necessary for the state to issue a guideline that companies can base themselves on. The nationalist mood is high and powerful and drowns out all other voices. “

The censorship campaign can be traced back to an argument that broke out last month when Swedish clothing giant H&M was suddenly scrubbed by Chinese online shopping sites. The move came after the Communist Youth League and state news media resurfaced a statement H&M made months ago expressing concerns about forced labor in Xinjiang.

Other Western clothing brands had also said they would avoid using Xinjiang cotton, and one by one, many Chinese celebrities parted ways with them. Since then, the loyalty test seems to have expanded to include streaming shows.

Fang Kecheng, an assistant professor of journalism at the Hong Kong University of China who studies media and politics, believed the platforms were most likely censoring the brands to prevent viewers from backlashing.

“If someone is not happy with these brands on the shows, they could launch a social media campaign targeting the producers, which could attract government attention and ultimately lead to punishment,” he said via E on Thursday -Mail.

As the blurring spread to clothing brands, shows started to hiccup. The video platform iQiyi announced that it would be delaying the release of an episode of “Youth With You 3”, a reality show for aspiring pop idols. The reason was not disclosed, but internet users suspected it had something to do with Adidas, which had supplied t-shirts and sneakers that participants could wear as a kind of team uniform.

Some internet users made mocking predictions about what the upcoming episode would look like and took photoshopping images to turn the contestants vertically so that their Adidas t-shirts read “Sabiba” instead.

When the episode was streamed two days later, pixelated rectangles obscured the t-shirts and sports jackets of dozens of dancers and the distinctive triple stripes on their Adidas sneakers. Internet users happily observed that none of the shirts had been spared, except for the one candidate who had worn his shirt backwards. Many expressed their condolences to the video editors for their lost sleep and the blurring of the T-shirts.

Other shows have performed similar blurring in post-production. Participants in another reality show for entertainers, “Sisters Who Make Waves”, practiced cartwheels in sneakers that flashed into imperceptible blurring. So many shoes were erased in the stand-up comedy series “Roast” that when a group gathered on a dais, the space between the floor and its long seams seemed to merge into a mist.

A representative for Tencent Video, which hosts Roast, declined to comment on why some brands have been censored. The streaming platforms iQiyi and Mango TV, which host “Youth With You 3” and “Sisters Who Make Waves” respectively, did not respond to requests for comments. Adidas did not respond to questions asked by email.

The blurring or cropping on the screen is hardly new in China. Male pop stars’ ear lobes have been airbrushed to hide earrings that are considered too feminine. A contemporary drama with cleavage typical of the Tang Dynasty was pulled from the air in 2015 and replaced with a version that cut out much of the costumes and awkwardly enlarged the speaking heads of the actors. Football players were instructed to cover arm tattoos with long sleeves.

The on-screen censorship shows the difficult line that online video platforms, regulated by the National Radio and Television Administration, must follow.

“The fuzziness is likely the platforms’ self-censorship to be sure,” said Haifeng Huang, associate professor of political science at the University of California at Merced and scholar of authoritarianism and public opinion in China.

“But it still implies the power of the state and the nationalist part of society, which is probably the message that the audience receives: These big platforms have to censor themselves, even without being explicitly stated.”

The blurry episodes also reveal how the platforms seem willing to sacrifice the quality of the viewing experience to avoid political clashes, even if they get the buttocks of audience jokes.

“In a social setting where censorship is commonplace, people become desensitized and even treat them as a different form of entertainment,” said Professor Huang.

Albee Zhang and Joy Dong contributed to the research.

Categories
Business

China’s Anger at Overseas Manufacturers Helps Native Rivals

Tim Min once drove BMWs. He considered buying a Tesla.

Instead, Mr. Min, the 33-year-old owner of a Beijing cosmetics startup, bought an electric car made by Tesla’s Chinese rival, Nio. He likes Nio’s interior and voice control functions better.

He also sees himself as a patriot. “I have a very strong affinity for Chinese brands and very strong patriotic emotions,” he said. “I loved Nike too. Now I see no reason for it. If there’s a good Chinese brand out there to replace Nike, I’ll be very happy about it. “

Western brands like H&M, Nike and Adidas have come under pressure in China for refusing to use cotton from the Xinjiang region, where the Chinese government has waged a widespread campaign to suppress ethnic minorities. The buyers vowed to boycott the brands. Celebrities dropped their advertising contracts.

However, foreign brands are also increasingly pressured by a new generation of Chinese competitors who manufacture high quality products and sell them through clever marketing to an increasingly patriotic group of young people. There is a term for it: “guochao” or Chinese fad.

HeyTea, a $ 2 billion milk tea startup with 700 stores, plans to replace Starbucks. Yuanqisenlin, a four-year low-sugar beverage company valued at $ 6 billion, aims to become China’s Coca-Cola. Ubras, a five year old company, wants to replace Victoria’s Secret with the non-Victoria’s product: non-wired, athletic bras that emphasize comfort.

The anger over Xinjiang cotton has given these Chinese brands another chance to win over consumers. When celebrities severed ties with overseas brands, Li-Ning, a Chinese sportswear giant, announced that Xiao Zhan, a boy band member, would become its new global ambassador. Almost everything Mr. Xiao wore in a Li-Ning advertisement sold out online within 20 minutes. A hashtag about the campaign was viewed more than a billion times.

China is experiencing a consumer brand revolution. The younger generation is more nationalistic and is actively looking for brands that can adapt to this confident Chinese identity. Entrepreneurs are rushing to build names and products that resonate. Investors are turning to these startups as tech and media companies’ returns decline.

When patriotism becomes a selling point, Western brands are put at a competitive disadvantage, especially in a country where global corporations are increasingly forced to follow the same policies as Chinese corporations.

China’s consumer protests are “a historic turning point and will have a long-term impact on Chinese consumers,” said Min. “Chinese consumers don’t want to eat the same crap that foreign brands have given them. It is important that foreign brands respect Chinese consumers as much as they respect Chinese brands. “

Foreign brands are far from finished in China. Its drivers helped make a jump into Tesla deliveries. IPhones are still very popular. Campaigns against foreign names have come and gone, and local brands that put too much emphasis on politics risk unwanted attention when the political winds change quickly.

However, the interest in local brands shows a clear shift. After Mao, the country produced few consumer goods. The first televisions that most families owned in the 1980s came from Japan. Pierre Cardin, the French designer, reintroduced fashion in 1979 with his first show in Beijing, bringing color and flair to a nation that wore blues and grays during the Cultural Revolution.

Chinese people born in the 1970s or earlier remember their first sip of Coca-Cola and their first bite of a Big Mac. We saw movies from Hollywood, Japan and Hong Kong for both the cabinets and makeup and the plot. We hurried to buy Head & Shoulders shampoo because the Chinese name Haifeisi means “seaworthy hair”.

In business today

Updated

April 6, 2021, 7:10 p.m. ET

“We’ve gone through the European and American fad, the Japanese and Korean fad, the American streetwear fad, and even the Hong Kong and Taiwan fad,” said Xun Shaohua, who founded a sportswear company in Shanghai that competes with Vans and Converse.

Now could be the time for the fad in China. Chinese companies make better products. China’s Generation Z, born between 1995 and 2009, do not share the same attachment to foreign names.

Even People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s traditionally incumbent official newspaper, relies on branding. With Li-Ning, the company launched a streetwear collection in 2019. In the same year it published a report on Baidu, the Chinese search company called “Guochao Pride Big Data”. They found that when searching for brands in China, more than two-thirds were looking for native names, up from only about a third ten years ago.

As with so much in China, it can be difficult to say how much the Guochao Movement involves in politics. Building homemade brands fits in perfectly with the Communist Party’s desire to make the country more independent. The officials also want the Chinese to buy more: private household consumption only accounts for around 40 percent of Chinese economic output, much less than in the US and Europe.

Patriotism aside, entrepreneurs argue that their ventures are built on solid business foundations. There were similar trends in Japan and South Korea, where strong brands are now based. Local actors know better the capabilities of the country’s supply chains and how to use social media.

Mr. Xun’s sports brand has half a million followers on Alibaba’s Taobao marketplace and sells at the same prices as Vans and Converse, or even slightly higher. He said his brand competed by making shoes that would better suit Chinese feet and offering locally preferred colors like mint green and fuchsia. He sells exclusively online and works with Chinese and overseas brands and personalities, including Pokemon and Hello Kitty. At 37, he is the only one in his company who was born before 1990.

Guochao fashion has also revived older Chinese brands like Li-Ning. For many years, discerning city dwellers considered the brand, created by a former world champion gymnast of the same name, ugly and cheap. The characteristic red and yellow color combination after the Chinese flag was derisively referred to as “eggs fried with tomatoes”, an everyday Chinese dish. Li-Ning lost money. The shares lost.

Then the company presented a collection at New York Fashion Week in early 2018. Its angular look, combined with bold Chinese characters and embroidery, caused quite a stir at home. Shares have increased nearly tenfold since then. Now, Li-Ning’s high-end collections average between $ 100 and $ 150, just like Adidas’.

As ambitious as these businessmen are, almost everyone I’ve spoken to admitted that the Chinese brands still couldn’t compete with mega-brands like Coca-Cola and Nike.

Alex Xie, a marketing consultant who works with companies in China, used the sportswear industry as an example. Nike has a long lead over Chinese brands in research and development. It has a deep network of relationships in the sports world. It works closely with athletes to develop better shoes, sponsors many events and teams, including China’s national soccer, basketball and athletics teams.

“It just has a much closer relationship with its customers than any Chinese brand,” he said.

But for these western megabrands, the cotton dispute in Xinjiang is a major challenge that could help their Chinese rivals. While previous outrage over Western brands like the National Basketball Association and Dolce & Gabbana passed pretty quickly, this battle could go on, many people said.

“In the past, some Western brands have failed to understand or disregard Chinese culture, mainly due to a lack of understanding,” said Xun. “This time it’s a political problem. You have violated our political sensitivities. “

Then, like any savvy Chinese entrepreneur who knows which issues are sensitive, he asked, “Couldn’t we talk about politics?”

Categories
Business

What’s Happening with China, Cotton and All of These Clothes Manufacturers?

Calls for the cancellation of H&M and other Western brands were rife on Chinese social media last week as human rights campaigns clashed with cotton procurement and political game art. Here’s what’s going on and how it can affect everything from your t-shirts to your trench coats.

What’s all I hear about fashion brands and China? Has anyone made another stupid racist ad?

No, it’s a lot more complicated than an offensive and overt cultural gaffe. The topic focuses on the Xinjiang region of China and allegations of forced labor in the cotton industry – allegations that have been denied by the Chinese government. Last summer, many Western brands made statements expressing concerns about human rights in their supply chain. Some even cut all ties to the region.

Now, months later, the chickens are coming home to settle down: Chinese internet users react with anger and accuse the allegations of being a criminal offense against the state. Leading Chinese e-commerce platforms have thrown major international labels off their websites, and a number of celebrities have denounced their former overseas employers.

Why is this such a big deal?

The problem has growing political and economic implications. On the one hand, as the pandemic continues to plague global retailers, consumers have become more attuned to who makes their clothes and how they are treated, and pressure on brands to put their values ​​where their products are. On the other hand, due to its size and the fact that there are fewer disruptions there than in other key markets such as Europe, China has become an increasingly important distribution center for the fashion industry. Even then, international politicians intervene and impose bans and sanctions. Fashion has become a diplomatic football.

This is a perfect case study of what happens when market bids clash with global morals.

Tell me more about Xinjiang and why it is so important.

Xinjiang is a region in northwest China where about a fifth of the world’s cotton is produced. It is home to many ethnic groups, particularly the Uighurs, a Muslim minority. Although it is officially the largest of China’s five autonomous regions, which theoretically means it has more legislative self-regulation, the central government is increasingly involved in the area, stating that it must exercise its authority over local conflicts with the Han Chinese (the ethnic Majority) who moved to the region. This has resulted in draconian restrictions, surveillance, criminal prosecution and forced labor camps.

OK, what about the Uyghurs?

The Uyghur population in Xinjiang is a predominantly Muslim Turkish group and, according to official information from the Chinese authorities, numbers just over 12 million. Up to a million Uyghurs and other Muslim minorities have been retrained to become model workers who obeyed the Chinese Communist Party through forced labor programs.

So it’s been like that for a while?

At least since 2016. According to the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, Axios and others published reports imprisoned Uyghurs in the supply chains of many of the world’s best-known fashion retailers, including Adidas, Lacoste, H&M, Ralph Lauren and the PVH Corporation, which includes Calvin Klein and Tommy Hilfiger, many of these brands have reassessed their relationships with Xinjiang cotton suppliers.

In January the Trump administration banned all imports of cotton from the region as well as products made from the material and declared the incident a “genocide”. At the time, the Workers Rights Consortium estimated that Xinjiang materials were involved in more than 1.5 billion pieces of clothing imported annually by American brands and retailers.

That is much! How do I know if I am wearing a Xinjiang cotton garment?

You do not do that. The supply chain is so complex and subcontracting so frequent that it is often difficult for brands to know exactly where and how each component of their garments is made.

If this has been a problem for over a year, why is everyone in China freaking out now?

It is not immediately apparent. One theory suggests that this is due to the rise in political brinkmanship between China and the West. On March 22, the UK, Canada, the European Union and the United States announced an escalating series of sanctions against Chinese officials for treating Uyghurs in Xinjiang.

Not long after, screenshots were posted on Chinese social media of a statement H&M released in September 2020, citing “deep concern” about reports of forced labor in Xinjiang and confirming that the retailer had stopped selling cotton from growers in the country Region to buy. The rainfall was quick and furious. There were calls for a boycott, and H&M products were soon missing from China’s most popular e-commerce platforms, Alibaba Group’s Tmall and JD.com. The excitement was fueled by comments from groups such as the Communist Youth League, an influential Communist Party organization, on the microblogging website Sina Weibo.

Within hours, other major western brands like Nike and Burberry started the trend for the same reason.

And it’s not just consumers who are in the arms: Influencers and celebrities have also severed ties with the brands. Even video games spawn virtual “looks” that Burberry created from their platforms.

Backtrack: What do influencers have to do with it?

Influencers in China have even more power over consumer behavior than in the West, which means they play a vital role in legitimizing brands and driving sales. For example, when Tao Liang, also known as Mr. Bags, worked with Givenchy, the bags were sold out within 12 minutes. A necklace and bracelet set he made with Qeelin reportedly sold out in a second (100 made). That’s why H&M worked with Victoria Song, Nike with Wang Yibo and Burberry with Zhou Dongyu.

However, Chinese influencers and celebrities are also sensitive to pleasing the central government and publicly affirming their national values ​​by often selecting their country in a performative manner over contracts.

In 2019, for example, Yang Mi, the Chinese actress and Versace ambassador, publicly rejected the brand when she made the mistake of creating a t-shirt that listed Hong Kong and Macau as independent countries and the “One China “Seemed to be fired. Politics and the sovereignty of the central government. Not long after, Coach was targeted after making a similar mistake and creating a t-shirt called Hong Kong and Taiwan. Liu Wen, the Chinese supermodel, immediately distanced herself from the brand.

And what about the video games?

Tencent removed two Burberry-designed “skins” – outfits of video game characters the brand had enthusiastically launched – from its popular Honor of Kings title in response to news that the brand had stopped purchasing cotton produced in the Xinjiang area . The looks had been available for less than a week.

So that applies to both fast fashion and the high end. How much of the fashion world is involved?

Maybe most of it. So far, Adidas, Nike, Converse and Burberry have been affected by the crisis. Even before the ban, other companies such as Patagonia, PVH, Marks & Spencer and The Gap announced that they would not source any material from Xinjiang and officially spoke out against human rights violations.

However, this week several brands including VF Corp., Inditex (owned by Zara) and PVH have silently removed their policies against forced labor from their websites.

That seems like a squirrel. Is that likely to escalate?

Brands seem concerned that the answer is yes, as some companies have proactively announced they will continue to buy cotton from Xinjiang, apparently in fear of offending the Chinese government. Hugo Boss, the German company whose suit is a de facto uniform for the financial world, posted a statement on Weibo: “We will continue to buy and support Xinjiang cotton” (although the company announced last fall that it would no longer be sourcing to be made from the region). Muji, the Japanese brand, like Uniqlo, proudly advertises the use of Xinjiang cotton on their Chinese websites.

Wait … I play possum, but why should a company publicly pledge its loyalty to Xinjiang cotton?

It’s about the Benjamins, buddy. China is projected to be the world’s largest luxury market by 2025, according to a report by Bain & Company released last December. Last year it was the only part of the world that saw year-on-year growth. The luxury market reached 44 billion euros ($ 52.2 billion).

Will anyone come out of this well?

One group of winners could be the Chinese fashion industry, which has long played second fiddle to Western brands, to the frustration of many companies there. Shares in Chinese apparel and textile companies linked to Xinjiang rose this week as the backlash gained momentum. And more than 20 Chinese brands made public statements announcing their support for Chinese cotton.

Categories
Business

Utz Manufacturers doubles down on digital advertisements to develop snack gross sales, retain prospects

Dylan Lissette, CEO of Utz Brands, told CNBC on Friday that the company is increasing its marketing spend on digital advertising to reach new customers and increase sales of snacks.

“We are investing a lot of money there. In the further course of 2021 [it will be] About 60% more, “he said in a Mad Money interview with Jim Cramer.” But if we look beyond that, we will invest even more. “

The company, which sells a range of salty snacks, including potato chips and pretzels, wants to capitalize on bans in pandemic times with consumers eating at home. The company’s portfolio includes brands such as Zapp’s, Golden Flake and Boulder Canyon.

“What we love [digital ads] is the fact that you are really able to turn a dime in … and keep track of what works, “he said.” If some kind of angle of attack works for one brand or another in reaching our customers, they are able to lean behind it very quickly. “

According to the annual report, Utz spent around 11.1 million US dollars on consumer marketing and advertising for the 2020 financial year ending on January 3. Lissette didn’t say how much would be spent on marketing and advertising expenses in the current fiscal year.

Lissette said there are more opportunities in social media and digital ads “than doing a commercial and running it for a year and realizing that it isn’t really giving you what you need”.

The Utz share rose by 5% to USD 26.56 on Friday. The 100-year-old brand went public last year through a purpose of the acquisition company.

Categories
Business

How manufacturers woo on-line grocery buyers

Cure Hydration founder and CEO Lauren Picasso had to find creative ways to get the company’s fruit-flavored products into shoppers’ baskets due to the pandemic.

Source: Cure Hydration

The happy break from Cure Hydration came at an odd time.

Amazon-owned Walmart, CVS, and Whole Foods carried the startup’s fruit-flavored hydration powder during the pandemic. However, boxes and packets of the electrolyte drink were often left in the back of stores as busy workers tried to replenish the shelves with high-demand items like hand sanitizer and paper towels. The main seller, offering free samples at sporting events like triathlons or after class in gyms, stalled. Customers didn’t discover the brand when shopping online or didn’t see the brand as they raced down the aisles on trips to the store.

Instead, Lauren Picasso, founder and CEO of Cure Hydration, decided to try a different strategy to get their products into the shopping baskets: free samples tucked away in Walmart’s roadside pick-up orders.

“As an emerging brand, we wanted to find a way to reach customers who knew they weren’t browsing stores as often as they used to,” she said.

She said the samples increased sales, cost less, and were easier to scale in about 1,000 stores.

Add a sample to the list of pandemic-related changes that may persist. As more grocery shoppers use roadside pickup and delivery, consumer goods companies have had to experiment with new ways to get their products in front of people. Large retailers are trying to capitalize on rising demand by charging brands for access to their customers and data they’ve gathered about their preferences – while delighting customers with freebies.

The Walmart + home screen on a laptop in Brooklyn, New York on Wednesday, November 18, 2020.

Gabby Jones | Bloomberg | Getty Images

One way to make money

For years, consumer goods companies have been paying retailers for prime real estate in stores that help them grab customer attention – like end caps, a product display at the end of an aisle. That equation has changed as more shoppers check their boxed purchases in a store’s parking lot after ordering them online.

Online grocery sales in the US rose 54% in 2020 and are projected to exceed $ 100 billion for the first time this year, according to eMarketer. The research firm said these habits will last the pandemic as shoppers see it as a more convenient way to shop even after vaccination. By next year, eMarketer expects more than half of the US population to be online grocery shoppers. It is estimated that online grocery sales will account for 11.2% of total U.S. grocery sales by 2023.

Walmart’s U.S. e-commerce sales increased 79% year over year in the past fiscal year. This is due to food orders but has not yet made a profit.

Sampling is a way of making money for Walmart. The retailer started a collection and delivery sampling program in 2014, but it’s gaining attention as more customer traffic shifts to the parking lot. The retailer charges businesses when their product is added to a curb or delivery order.

Walmart is looking for new sources of income as it creates additional costs associated with online ordering, such as buying and selling items online. B. Picking grocery orders from the shelves and shipping purchases to customers. At a recent investor meeting, Doug McMillon, CEO of Walmart, said he wanted to use his reach as the world’s largest retailer to grow other businesses, including advertising. He said it wants to monetize the data it collects on buyers.

Brands of all sizes

Even the big brands are taking note. General Mills has increased the number of samples paid for roadside collection at retailers like Walmart, Kroger and Target.

Jay Picconatto, director of brand commerce marketing at General Mills, said sampling at grocery collection was “something we wouldn’t even have touched two years ago or 18 months ago.” But when retail traffic collapsed last spring and retailers restricted the in-store demos, he said the company had sneaked in aggressively.

For example, some Walmart shoppers may have received a sample of Old El Paso taco seasoning with recipe cards all about Cinco de Mayo. Walmart handed out its Annie’s Fruit Snacks and Bunny Grahams at a Walmart drive-in movie event.

“Then we found, hey, it works and we actually like what happens,” he said. As more shoppers pick up groceries from the roadside, he said, “It’s a place where we want to keep playing.”

Alvis Washington, Walmart’s vice president of marketing, store design, innovation and experience, said its sampling program can help brands connect with the right customers. Personalization of the samples a customer receives is an important goal.

It can also be used to build customer loyalty with Walmart, Washington said. Some of its store parking lots have been turned into drive-in theaters and trick-or-treating sites. A special Mother’s Day event was held at a store near headquarters in Arkansas. It lit the sky above several stores for a drone show while on vacation.

At each event, the participants were surprised with a bag of samples. Washington said the company plans to roll this out to other Walmart and Sam’s Club stores. He described it as a “triple win” – making Walmart a more attractive shopping destination, providing a fun activity for customers, and enabling suppliers to “bring their new and innovative products to customers”.

He said Walmart could start charging an insertion fee for the pouch bags, as it does with its roadside sample collection business model, and the companies would cover the cost of the products.

Walmart also tested a welcome box for customers who join Walmart +, the subscription service that launched this fall. Each contains a Walmart + branded shopping bag and product samples. He said the retailer is expanding the program and plans to tailor the box more closely to customer preferences in the future.

A worker delivers groceries to a customer’s vehicle outside of a Walmart Inc. store in Amsterdam, New York on Friday, May 15, 2020.

Angus Mordant | Bloomberg via Getty Images

More for the money

Picasso said the new approaches to product discovery are simpler and cheaper. On a good day, she said, an in-store demo handed out about 300 samples – which cost about 50 cents per sample, including the fee for reserving space in a store and filling it. She said the cost of including a sample in a roadside pick-up order or a pouch bag varies by retailer, but is typically between 10 and 30 cents each.

“It’s much more economical to get into people’s hands in other ways,” she said.

Picasso said the company is retesting demo stations in some Whole Foods stores with a pandemic. Each pack of powder is individually wrapped, and users can take a cane and branded bottled water with them to safely try the product at home.

For other foods and beverages, however, she said the “ick” factor could outlast the pandemic as shoppers remain germ-conscious and don’t want to eat a chopped up granola bar.

Additionally, retailers are becoming increasingly sophisticated, allowing companies to add samples to some roadside pick-up orders, rather than others, based on a customer’s purchase history – a more focused approach than relying on the right strangers to come over and pick up a sample.

General Mills will continue to pay for shop displays, Picconatto said. However, he said the pandemic has changed “how we think about the balance between in-store levers and online levers” – especially as e-commerce accounts for a higher percentage of total sales.

“Ultimately, what is really important to us is getting on that shopping list,” he said.