Tag: Bill

Categories
Politics

Authorities shutdown looms as Congress crafts coronavirus stimulus invoice

Government shutdown looms as Congress crafts coronavirus stimulus bill

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, walks to his office from the Senate at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC on December 18, 2020.

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

Congress dangerously neared the government shutdown as lawmakers failed to put the finishing touches on Friday on a massive spending and coronavirus bailout package.

Before midnight Friday to pass a spending bill, the House put in place a two-day emergency bill to keep the government going. Legislators gave themselves roughly seven and a half hours to get it through both houses of Congress, including a Senate where a member’s objection can block its swift passage.

Heads of state and government on Capitol Hill have said for days that they are on the verge of reaching an agreement on a $ 900 billion aid proposal that would cost $ 1.4 trillion in spending. However, some new disputes have prevented Washington from sending new aid to warring Americans for the first time in nearly nine months.

On Friday afternoon, it seemed like a challenge to reach an agreement on a huge spending and pandemic relief plan, let alone keep government spending from deteriorating. While bipartisan House representatives, including minority leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Endorse the temporary funding bill, the Senate will pose bigger problems.

Passing a temporary spending measure known as a rolling resolution “could prove quite difficult,” Senate Republican No. 2 Republican John Thune of South Dakota told reporters Friday. To quickly approve the move, the Senate would need the support of every Senator. A handful of lawmakers have proposed halting the passage of a short-term spending bill.

Thune also signaled it could take days to iron out a definitive coronavirus relief package as millions of Americans await help.

“It comes together, it just takes time, but it’s slower,” he said. “And you know, I think we have to assume that even if a deal is announced, we will work through the weekend if it is written and edited.”

Just after 2 p.m. ET on Friday, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Said the Chamber would be on hiatus until 5 p.m. while congressional leaders try to get a “clearer picture” of how to move forward . He urged representatives to keep Friday evenings, Saturday and Sunday free.

If the legislature can approve an expenditure calculation before Monday, the damage would be limited by a failure of federal funding.

The leaders of Congress have pledged to work through the weekend and pass a bill before heading home for the vacation. The health and livelihood of millions of Americans depend on Congress sending more aid before the end of the year.

Just hours earlier, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. described an agreement as imminent.

“The talks remain productive,” said McConnell on Friday morning. “In fact, I am now even more optimistic than last night that a non-partisan two-chamber framework for a major rescue package is very close.”

With healthcare workers receiving Covid-19 vaccinations during a crushing wave of infections across the country, federal funding is required for further distribution of the shots. The outbreak has killed more than 310,000 people nationwide as the US struggles to contain its spread.

Meanwhile, 12 million people will lose unemployment insurance the day after Christmas if Congress doesn’t extend the pandemic provisions that expanded benefits. If a federal eviction moratorium expires at the end of the month, millions are at risk of losing their homes.

While the developing $ 900 billion relief plan is designed to expand these unemployment benefits, it is currently unclear how it will address evacuation protection and any assistance to those who owe rent.

The proposal is expected to reintroduce a federal unemployment insurance surcharge of $ 300 per week. A federal payment of $ 600 a week introduced in March expired in the summer, dropping revenues by millions.

The package would include direct payments of $ 600, although it’s unclear who is eligible to receive them. Families are expected to receive $ 600 for children as well. Progressives in Congress and some Republicans have labeled the sum too low for people to come by during the pandemic, finding that lawmakers easily approved a direct payment of $ 1,200 in March.

White House advisors have stopped President Donald Trump from sending last-minute checks for up to $ 2,000 to Americans, the Washington Post reported Thursday.

Senator Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Attempted to approve a measure that would allow another direct payment of $ 1,200 on Friday. He called the injection of cash “the least we can do for working families”.

Senator Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., Then objected to passing the measure on public debt concerns, arguing that tax cuts and deregulation would better serve Americans who are out of work during the pandemic. It is unclear how these measures would help people find it difficult to afford food and housing now.

The exchange highlighted the challenges that Congress will face in the coming days in both preventing a shutdown and passing a bailout package. Johnson even called the $ 900 billion package, which contains only $ 600 checks, “way too big”.

Hawley said he would block a short-term government funding bill unless he saw a final aid proposal that included direct payments.

Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., Attempted to pass a proposal that would send $ 1,200 in direct payments later Friday afternoon. The Senator, backed by Senate Minority Chairman Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., said, “In this time of crisis, it’s funny that our Republican friends are finding again that we are in deficit.”

Johnson disagreed again.

The Congressional relief plan would include at least $ 300 billion in small business support. It would also provide funding for the distribution and testing of Covid-19 vaccines and provide relief to hospitals.

The proposal would put money in schools and the transport sector.

A handful of problems sparked the final phase of negotiations. This includes a Federal Emergency Management Agency relief fund for states and restrictions. Senator Pat Toomey, R-Pa., Wants to strengthen the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending powers during the pandemic, according to NBC News.

Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Said Republicans who support the provision “sabotage” President-elect Joe Biden’s ability to lead an economic recovery after taking office on Jan. 20.

“Proposals to sabotage President Biden and our nation’s economy are ruthless, false and have no place in this legislation,” she said in a statement.

In a later statement, the Chairs of House Financial Services and the Ways and Means Committee said an agreement was “in sight” before the GOP pushed for an “unacceptable provision”.

“The extreme Senate Republican call threatens to derail this much-needed move and it must be abandoned immediately so we can move forward,” said MPs Maxine Waters, D-Calif., And Richard Neal, D-Mass Statement.

A Toomey spokesperson did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request to comment on Democratic criticism.

Congress passed the $ 2 trillion CARES bill in late March, which provides solid economic support in the early stages of the pandemic. But lawmakers did not offer any new help in the months that followed, despite the ravages of the virus, financial lifelines falling by the wayside, and cracks in the economic recovery.

Democrats have pushed for significantly more relief. Calling the $ 900 billion plan a “down payment,” Biden has signaled that he will attempt to approve further aid after he takes office on Jan. 20.

McConnell pushed for new spending of only about $ 500 billion for months. Many in his party resisted putting so much money into a relief plan.

Next year, Democrats are likely to push for new aid to state and local governments who may have to lay off first responders when faced with budget crises. The GOP did not agree to send the relief without corporate liability coverage.

The leaders of Congress agreed to set both issues aside in negotiating the year-end package.

– CNBC’s Kayla Tausche contributed to this report

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Politics

Trump indicators invoice to forestall authorities shutdown

Trump signs bill to prevent government shutdown

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi leaves a meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on December 18, 2020.

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

President Donald Trump signed a two-day government funding bill on Friday evening as Congress tries to buy time to finalize a deal on spending and coronavirus aid.

The president signed the legislation to keep the government going about an hour and a half before midnight to pass the spending legislation. The stopgap would fund federal operations through Sunday, 12:00 p.m. (CET) Monday morning, while congress leaders attempt to finalize a year-round funding and coronavirus relief package.

Even after lawmakers avoided a shutdown, Congress is again on a tight deadline. The House will meet again on Sunday at 12:00 PM ET and will vote no earlier than 1:00 PM. The Senate is due to return on Saturday at 11 a.m. ET and is expected to deal with nominations.

Senators, including independent Vermont-based Bernie Sanders and Missouri Republican Josh Hawley, had warned they might delay approving an spending bill as they campaign for leadership to include a direct payment of $ 1,200 in a pandemic relief package. None of the legislators followed the warning.

Before the Senate unanimously passed the spending bill, Sanders said he would object to “any attempt” by the chamber to pass a full-year spending plan without also approving a pandemic relief package that includes “significant direct payments.”

Hawley previously tweeted that he would not block the legislation after top Republicans reassured him that a definitive aid deal would include “direct aid to the working people.” Lawmakers are expected to include $ 600 in payments, compared to the $ 1,200 checks approved under the CARES Act in March.

The house first tried to unanimously pass the financing law on Friday. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, however, opposed and forced a full vote.

The move delayed the passage of the law by more than an hour as Congress worked on a tight schedule to exceed the shutdown deadline. The House agreed with 320-60 votes.

For the second time this month, lawmakers are aiming to give themselves more time to pack a year-round spending bill and money to kickstart the healthcare system and economy following a relentless coronavirus outbreak. They already approved a week-long extension that kept the light on until Friday.

The leaders of Congress have been saying for days that they are close to a much-needed pandemic relief deal. However, they failed to iron out the final details of a $ 900 billion package.

Millions of Americans await help as the virus overwhelms hospitals and healthcare workers. Covid-19 is now killing thousands of Americans every week.

New economic restrictions to contain the outbreak have exacerbated the pain for those who are already struggling to afford food and housing.

A Republican-backed proposal to limit the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending power now represents the biggest hurdle to a deal. Democrats say the move would affect President-elect Joe Biden’s ability to respond to the ongoing economic crisis after speaking out on Jan. 20 has taken office.

In addition to the direct payments, the development plan would include an unemployment benefit of $ 300 per week. This would prolong an expansion of unemployment benefits during the pandemic period, which would lose 12 million people the day after Christmas.

It is currently unclear how the proposal would deal with a federal eviction moratorium. The ordinance expires at the end of the year and can leave millions of people vulnerable to eviction.

The package would put at least $ 300 billion in aid to small businesses. It would include money for distribution and testing of Covid-19 vaccines, as well as facilities for hospitals.

It would also channel funds to schools that had to adapt to stay open or go virtual during the pandemic.

The bill does not address government and local support or corporate liability protection. These issues divided Democratic and Republican leaders.

Democrats and many ordinary GOP lawmakers, as well as non-partisan governors, supported state and local aid as needed to maintain jobs for first responders and enable officials to contain the pandemic. The GOP argued that immunity would protect small businesses from frivolous litigation.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Business

Billionaire Invoice Gross is a Gilligan’s Island superfan and four different shocking details

Billionaire Bill Gross is a Gilligan's Island superfan and 4 other surprising facts

Bill Gross, co-founder of Pacific Investment Management Co. (PIMCO), and girlfriend Amy Schwartz wear protective masks when they arrive at the State Court in Santa Ana, California, United States on Monday, December 7, 2020.

David Swanson | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Billionaire investor Bill Gross has a special place in his heart for the theme song “Gilligan’s Island”. He is an avid dancer. He admits to being very jealous when it comes to his girlfriend. And he’s especially proud of his $ 1 million glass lawn sculpture.

These are some of the many unusual revelations from the legal battle that took place in a California courtroom between Gross and his neighbor, tech entrepreneur Mark Towfiq, in Laguna Beach. At the center of the hearings, which have dragged on for more than two weeks, are claims for harassment and injunctions. Gross says Towfiq is a “peeping Tom” filming Gross’ friend in her bikini. Towfiq said Gross was a “briefly merged billionaire” who played loud music late at night in retaliation for complaints about the glass lawn sculpture.

The final arguments ended yesterday, and Orange County Superior Court Judge Kimberly A. Knill is likely to rule on the legal issues on Wednesday. The legal aspects, however, have become a side effect alongside the more central drama of the case – a colorful portrait of the 76-year-old investment legend emerged from the turf wars and ego struggles of the two rich men.

Here are five of the most surprising revelations about Gross from witnesses, text messages, documents, and videos at the hearing.

Gilligan’s Island

He’s a super fan of Gilligan’s Island – especially the music. Towfiq complained that Gross blasted the Gilligan’s Island theme late at night on a loop over his outdoor sound system to harass Towfiq. Towfiq suggested that Gross choose the song because of its anger factor.

Gross said blasting Gilligan’s Island at any time of the day or night was the order of the day in both houses because it had a special meaning. It all started one day last summer when he was watching old episodes of the show on YouTube and discovered that the footage in the marina title sequence looked like it was taken from the exact location of his Newport Beach home.

“I could look at the television and look out the window, and there were the same palm trees from 55 years ago,” Gross testified. “I said ‘that’s amazing.’ “”

He showed his girlfriend Amy Schwartz, and the song quickly topped the charts in large households.

“We kept playing it and it just became something we did,” he explained. “We play it all the time.”

They also enjoy other theme songs that they play sometimes.

“In the course of time we have learned texts and we act together with hands and pointing. It’s like a little piece … we really like it.”

Also on his playlist: 50 Cent and Kenny Loggins, who played at Schwartz’s birthday party.

‘The jealous guy’

He’s the “jealous guy”. Gross’ girlfriend, or as he calls her “life partner”, is Amy Schwartz, the 51-year-old former tennis player and amateur golfer. Gross said Towfiq often filmed Amy next door, sometimes in her bikini.

Towfiq said he only filmed his neighbors to document the sculpture and its harassment.

“I’m a jealous guy,” said Gross. “She is very attractive. I am very jealous.”

He said the couple referred to Towfiq as a “peeping mark” because Gross assumed he had watched them so often.

“Sometimes Amy went out on the balcony and said, ‘I wonder if Mark is watching, he’s filming this.’ “”

Gross said Towfiq once filmed the couple returning from the beach, “with their hair wet and salt all over their bodies. It almost seemed like this was his full-time job.”

Happy to be standing

For Gross, happiness is complicated and fear is relative. At the beginning of his testimony, Gross was asked if he was “unhappy” when he learned that his sculpture could be removed for violating the Laguna Beach Code.

“At my age, happiness and sadness are not applicable in situations like this,” he said. “I’m just happy to be standing.”

He added: “I don’t judge my mood that way at the moment. I can’t say whether I’m happy or sad.”

Gross’ moods became a frequent topic of discussion. Towfiq said Gross’ previous owner Patrick Boyd Gross described him as “an angry billionaire with a short fuse”. Boyd, a former money manager at Gross’ former company PIMCO, offered Towfiq his “condolences” when he heard that Gross would be the new neighbor.

In a session that sounded more like a therapy session than a court testimony, Gross examined his feelings of anxiety and how they developed over the course of his life as he became more isolated from the world. He said he felt “very scared” when Towfiq was filming Gross in his gym shorts and reading decibel levels on their property line late at night.

“I was very scared,” said Gross. “It was malicious … this man took me in. He crouched behind my own wall.”

Gross then recalled fights in Vietnam and later in life that almost crashed on a plane.

“I saw bullets from Viet Cong and 15 years later on a plane that nearly crashed in North Carolina,” he said. “I’m not saying that this incident was something like that. But for the past five or ten years I have been more protected from anxious situations and have not really been used to them.”

Enthusiastic dancer

He’s a dance machine. Gross said he and Schwartz are enthusiastic dancers – and not just for the theme song “Gilligan’s Island”. When asked to specify what he said he was dancing on the balcony, Gross said, “Oh yeah. On the balcony, in the bedroom, up and down the lawn path entrance because it’s a good long area to get creative Inventing steps. Amy and I do this a lot. “

Gross said they would dance to Gilligan’s Island over and over again sometimes. “Only two or three – I mean, you can only dance until you’re ready for bed.”

Requires privacy

He needs protection from the public. While not exactly a celebrity outside of the investing world, Gross said he is often followed by the public, which is why he has to live behind so many gates and walls.

“We needed privacy,” he said when asked about his purchase of the Laguna Beach home.

“Amy has always emphasized that I am a public figure and that we just have to stand behind a goal.” His lawyer then mentions the risk of people coming off the beach, and Gross said “Millions of people couldn’t come to see where Gross lives”.

Categories
Politics

Senate seems to be to go funding invoice

Senate looks to pass funding bill

Update: The Senate passed the government’s one-week funding law on Friday afternoon. An earlier version of this story is below.

The Senate had only hours to prevent the government from closing on Friday as lawmakers threatened to halt the swift passage of a spending bill.

Funding goes off if the Chamber does not approve a mediocre measure and President Donald Trump does not sign it before midnight. The House has already approved a week-long extension of government spending until December 18.

Legislators hope the bill will give them more time to finalize elusive year-round funding and coronavirus relief deals. However, it got more complicated to turn the lights on for another week on Friday.

In order to survive the shutdown, the measure requires unanimous approval. This means any senator can delay their approval, and several lawmakers have suggested doing so.

Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., And Josh Hawley, R-Mo., Urged a vote on a proposal to send direct payments of up to $ 1,200 per person and $ 500 per child. They criticized Congress ‘failure to put more money into Americans’ pockets for months during health and economic crises.

“In the midst of so much economic despair, Congress cannot pause without providing this $ 1,200 emergency aid to the American people in their distress,” Sanders said in a statement Thursday evening as he introduced the amendment he and Hawley proposed to the Senate hope is attached to the financing measure.

Meanwhile, NBC News reported that Florida Republican Sens. Rick Scott and Indiana Mike Braun want to tie a bill to end government closings to the week-long funding.

It is now unclear whether any of the lawmakers will actually delay the passage of the spending bill and let the funding forfeit.

The Senate cleared a potential hurdle when Senator Rand Paul, R-Ky., Told reporters he was not going to hold up the household bill. He delayed the passage of the annual National Defense Approval Act for a day amid concerns about the $ 740 billion cost and a provision that would restrict the president’s authority to withdraw troops from overseas.

A previous protest from Paul resulted in a brief shutdown in 2018.

The passage of the spending measure would keep the government going for just a week. The appropriators have failed to reach a final agreement on a plan to fund the government by September 30, 2021, but Congress leaders said they hope they can do so before next week.

Previously, Republicans and Democrats had agreed on a total price of 1.4 trillion US dollars for a year-round spending package.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Politics

Senate passes $740 billion protection invoice as Trump veto menace looms

Senate passes $740 billion defense bill as Trump veto threat looms

An F-35B Lightning II fighter aircraft with Marine Medium Tiltrotor Squadron (VMM) 265 (Reinforced), 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU), prepares for takeoff from the flight deck of the amphibious assault ship USS America (LHA 6) prior to a strike exercise inflatable maritime target.

Lance Cpl. Joshua Brittenham | US Marine Corps | FlickrCC

WASHINGTON – The Senate passed a colossal defense policy bill on Friday despite multiple threats from President Donald Trump to veto the measure.

At least 75 members of the Republican-led Senate voted for the massive annual defense bill of $ 740 billion, a number larger than the two-thirds majority it would take to defeat Trump’s promised veto.

With the weight of the House and Senate behind the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), the bill hits Trump’s desk with overwhelming support from Congress.

The NDAA, which is usually passed with strong support from both parties and veto-proof majorities, approves spending totaling 740 billion US dollars and outlines Pentagon policies.

Earlier this month, Trump threatened to veto the must-pass defense law if lawmakers fail to remove legal protections for social media companies.

Trump is calling for the repeal of a federal law known as Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects tech giants like Facebook and Twitter from legal liability for what is posted on their platforms.

Last week, Trump described the provision as a “liability protection gift” for “Big Tech” and called for it to be “terminated entirely”, otherwise he would not use this year’s NDAA.

The president also said the move posed a serious threat to US national security and electoral integrity, but did not provide any further explanation. Trump has also said that Twitter, his favorite social media platform, wrongly censored him.

The President’s problem with Section 230 came to light this summer after Twitter added warnings to several of its tweets that alleged mail-in polls were fraudulent. Trump has still not allowed Democrat Joe Biden to hold the US presidential election.

US President Donald Trump speaks after the swearing-in ceremony of James Mattis as Secretary of Defense on January 27, 2017 at the Pentagon in Washington, DC.

Almond Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

This year’s legislation includes a 3% pay increase for US troops, a plan to rename military facilities with the names of Confederate leaders, and a number of other provisions.

The NDAA, in its current form, does not contain any action related to Section 230.

This is not the first time the president has targeted the NDAA. Earlier this year, Trump said he would veto the measure if it included language for changing U.S. military facilities named after Confederate generals.

Categories
World News

Trump indicators funding invoice amid Covid reduction push

Trump signs funding bill amid Covid relief push

President Donald Trump signed a week-long government funding extension Friday as Congress rushed to secure coronavirus spending and relief.

The Senate passed the measure in a vote earlier in the day, and the House approved it this week. Funding would have expired on Saturday if Washington hadn’t passed a spending plan.

The law will fund the government until December 18th. Congressional leaders hope to have both a year-round funding package and pandemic aid approved by then. You have tried to reach an agreement on both fronts.

The appropriators have agreed on a $ 1.4 trillion price for the legislation to keep the government running through September 30, 2021. However, they have not agreed on exactly where the money should go.

Despite the most frantic effort in months to develop a coronavirus bailout, Congress must resolve several major disputes to reach an agreement. Millions of Americans await help as an uncontrolled outbreak ravages communities across the country, creating hunger that has not been seen for years.

If the legislature cannot pass relief laws in the coming days, around 12 million people will lose unemployment benefits the day after Christmas. An eviction moratorium and provisions for family leave introduced at the beginning of this year will also expire at the end of December.

Two senators, the independent Vermont-based Bernie Sanders and the Missouri Republican Josh Hawley, threatened to block the spending measure when they urged Congress to send more aid to Americans. Legislators wanted to vote on a proposal to send another direct payment of up to $ 1,200 for individuals and $ 500 per child.

Sanders said he decided not to object to government funding on Friday but would do so next week if Congress didn’t seek more relief.

“We are more hungry in America today than ever before in the modern history of this country,” said the senator when pressing for direct payments.

For months, Congress failed to provide more aid to Americans, despite ongoing health and economic crises. A GOP-backed proposal to give businesses immunity from coronavirus-related lawsuits and a plan to send more aid to state and local governments backed by Democrats and many Republicans remain the biggest sticking points in reaching a settlement .

Democrats have also criticized the fact that the recent $ 916 billion aid offer from the White House, blessed by GOP congressional leaders, does not include additional federal unemployment insurance funds. It has a direct payment of $ 600, half the total of the March stimulus checks approved by Congress.

Democrats have put their weight behind a $ 908 billion package put together by a non-partisan group. The measure would include unemployment benefit of $ 300 per week but no direct payments.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Politics

Senate Sends Navy Invoice to Trump’s Desk, Spurning His Veto Menace

Senate Sends Military Bill to Trump’s Desk, Spurning His Veto Threat

WASHINGTON – The Senate overwhelmingly passed a comprehensive military policy law on Friday to remove Confederate names from American military bases to clarify the measure for enactment and to keep them on President Trump’s desk despite his veto threats send.

The vote between 84 and 13 to pass the legislation reflected widespread support from both parties for the measure authorizing the payment of American troops and was intended to signal Mr Trump that lawmakers, including many Republicans, were determined to do the critical Passing the law, even if this may mean giving up the first right of veto of his presidency.

The margin exceeded the two-thirds majority required in both houses to force passage of the law on Mr Trump’s objections. The House also hit that threshold in passing the measure on Tuesday, increasing the prospect of a possible veto showdown in Mr Trump’s final weeks of office.

The scene that played out in the Senate on Friday underscored how the Republicans, who did not want to challenge the president on any other issue during his four-year term, were extraordinarily ready to break with Mr Trump over one of the party’s key orthodoxy – military strength project.

“I encourage all of us to do what we must to bring this bill to fruition,” said Senator James M. Inhofe, Republican of Oklahoma and Chairman of the Armed Forces Committee, to his colleagues in a speech from the ground. “There is no one in America who deserves more than our troops that are in danger, and we will make sure we are doing what is right for them.”

Thirteen senators, evenly spaced across party lines, voted against the bill, with Republicans supporting Mr Trump’s objections and Democrats chafing on the bill’s topline number. Three Senators, Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, Mike Rounds, Republican of South Dakota, and Kamala Harris, Democrat of California and vice president-elect, did not vote.

Congress has succeeded in passing the military law every year for 60 years. But Mr Trump has threatened to change that tradition, pledging to veto the legislation since the summer, even as his own party’s leaders privately pleaded with him to support it.

Mr Trump initially opposed a provision largely backed by lawmakers from both parties in both chambers that would strip the names of Confederate leaders from military bases. In the past few weeks his attention has shifted, demanding that the bill provide for an independent lifting of a legal shield for social media companies.

This demand, which was registered late in the legislative process, found little support from the legislators of both parties. They feel it is untenable to take an important, unrelated political move towards the defense law. They were hoping that strong voices in both chambers would convince Mr Trump to back off his threat of veto. However, so far the president has given no indication that he will do so.

The legislation includes a number of undisputed, bipartisan measures, including new benefits for tens of thousands of Vietnam-era veterans exposed to Agent Orange, a 3 percent increase in service member wages and an increase in remuneration for dangerous levies.

It would also take steps to slow or block Mr Trump’s planned withdrawal of American troops from Germany and Afghanistan, and it would make it difficult for the president to deploy military personnel on the southern border.

Legislation also directly addresses the racial justice protests sparked by the police killing black Americans, including George Floyd, this summer. All federal officials who enforce crowd control during protests and demonstrations would have to identify themselves and their authorities. And it includes the bipartisan move directing the Pentagon to begin renaming military bases named after Confederate leaders, a provision the Democrats fought to uphold.

If Mr. Trump were to enforce his threatened veto, the House would be the first to attempt an override.

Emily Cochrane contributes to the coverage.