Categories
Health

China orders Wuhan mass testing, Beijing restrictions as Covid delta spreads

Residents of Wuhan city in China’s Hubei province queue to take nucleic acid tests for Covid-19 on August 3, 2021.

STR | AFP | Getty Images

China is facing pockets of resurgence in major cities from Beijing to Wuhan, and authorities have imposed mass testing and widespread travel restrictions in some areas.

Daily Covid-19 cases are rising again as the delta variant spreads across the country.

China’s National Health Commission said it confirmed 96 Covid cases on Wednesday — the third straight day it reported 90 cases and above. Of the newly confirmed cases, 71 were locally transmitted, said the health commission.

Economists are concerned that a strict government clampdown on movements could hurt the economy — the only major economy to grow last year.

“China has shown before that it is willing to take tough action to control Covid, and we don’t doubt that it will do so again this time,” Robert Carnell, regional head of Asia-Pacific research at Dutch bank ING, said in a note on Wednesday.

“Tough restrictions on movement and travel already in place will likely bring the desired results. But the delta variant is a particularly slippery little critter, and the concern for us, and we imagine, many others, is how quickly this will occur, and at what economic cost in the meantime,” he added.

Read more about China from CNBC Pro

When Covid-19 first emerged in the country in late 2019, authorities used strict lockdowns and mass testing to control the nationwide outbreak.

Since then, Chinese authorities have clamped down hard on any flare-ups in Covid infections. The latest spread of the more transmissible Covid delta variant has again led authorities to tighten containment measures across the country.

State media Xinhua News Agency reported that authorities have urged people to limit travel and avoid gatherings, as well as suspended some flights, trains and long-distance bus services.

The capital of Beijing imposed strict entry and exit controls on Sunday and is said to be at a “critical stage” of epidemic control after cases rose late July for the first time in months, Xinhua reported.

Wuhan city, where the coronavirus first emerged, will test all its residents for Covid new cases emerged, the news agency said.

As of July 20, more than 17 million doses of Covid vaccines have been administered in Wuhan, and the vaccination rate of those 18 years and above hit 77.63%, according to the Wuhan municipal health commission.

‘Slow patch’ in China’s economy

China’s economic recovery has been uneven, with exports-oriented sectors driving most of the growth while domestic consumption has been slower to return.  

The resurgence in Covid-19 infections and the latest containment measures would delay a recovery in Chinese household spending, said Sian Fenner, lead Asia economist at consultancy Oxford Economics.

“The geographical spread of the delta variant is going to be concerning the Chinese authorities. We’ve already seen that they have a very low tolerance towards, you know, even a relatively small flare up,” she told CNBC’s “Squawk Box Asia” on Wednesday.

“We had hoped that with the increase in vaccination rates, that would actually improve that service consumption, but it looks like we’re in for another sort of slow patch going forward and … the delayed recovery in household spending,” she added.

Fenner said she’s maintaining her full-year growth forecast of 8.4% for China for now. That’s slightly higher than the International Monetary Fund’s projected growth of 8.1% in China.

— CNBC’s Weizhen Tan contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

Blinken says China threatens NATO, requires joint strategy to counter Beijing

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken speaks after a meeting of NATO foreign ministers at NATO headquarters in Brussels on March 24, 2021.

Virginia Mayo | AFP | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – Foreign Minister Antony Blinken on Wednesday issued a strong charge against China’s extensive use of coercive measures, calling on NATO allies to work with the US to push Beijing back.

Blinken said in a speech at NATO headquarters in Brussels that the US would not force its European allies to “choose between us or them”. However, he made it clear that Washington sees China as an economic and security threat to NATO allies in Europe, particularly in the area of ​​technology.

“There is no question that Beijing’s coercive behavior threatens our collective security and prosperity and is actively working to undermine the rules of the international system and the values ​​that we and our allies share,” said Blinken after two days of consultation with NATO Allies. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) is an alliance of 30 member states.

The secretary said there was still room to work with China on common challenges such as climate change and health security, but urged NATO to stand together if Beijing forces any of the alliance’s members.

“We know our allies have complex relationships with China that are not always a perfect match for ours. But we need to address these challenges together. That means working with our allies to fill the gaps in areas such as technology and infrastructure who are located in Beijing to use force pressure, “said Blinken.

“If either of us is forced, we should act as allies and work together to reduce our vulnerability by making sure our economies are more integrated,” said America’s top diplomat.

Blinken evoked China’s militarization of the South China Sea, predatory economy, intellectual property theft and human rights abuses.

On Monday, the Biden government again imposed sanctions on two Chinese officials, citing their role in serious human rights violations against ethnic minorities in Xinjiang.

The Treasury Department accused China of using repressive tactics, including mass detention and surveillance, against Uyghurs and other ethnic minorities in the region for the past five years.

“Targets of this surveillance are often arrested and reportedly subjected to various methods of torture and ‘political re-education’,” the Treasury Department wrote in a statement.

Beijing previously denied US allegations that it committed genocide against the Uyghurs, a Muslim population native to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in northwest China.

Blinken’s comments follow a controversial meeting between Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and China’s top diplomats Yang Jiechi and State Councilor Wang Yi in Alaska.

Before the Alaska talks, Blinken slammed China’s widespread use of “coercion and aggression” on the international stage, warning that the US would push back if necessary.

“China is using coercion and aggression to systematically undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, undermine democracy in Taiwan, abuse human rights in Xinjiang and Tibet, and make maritime claims in the South China Sea that violate international law,” said Flashing at a press conference in Japan.

Tensions between Beijing and Washington increased under the Trump administration, which sparked a trade war and prevented Chinese tech companies from doing business in the US.

Over the past four years, the Trump administration blamed China for a variety of abuses, including intellectual property theft, unfair trade practices and, most recently, the coronavirus pandemic.

President Joe Biden, who spoke with Chinese President Xi Jinping last month, previously said his approach to China would be different from that of his predecessor as he would work more closely with allies to achieve a backlash against Beijing.

“We will face China’s economic abuse,” said Biden in a speech at the State Department, describing Beijing as America’s “most serious competitor.”

“But we are also ready to work with Beijing if it is in the US interest,” said the president. “We will compete from a position of strength by improving at home and working with our allies and partners.”

Blinken, the first cabinet-level official in Biden to visit NATO, reiterated US commitment to the world’s most powerful alliance.

“We need to be able to have these tough conversations and even disagree while still treating each other with respect. In the past few years we seem to have forgotten too often who our friends are in the US. That has already changed, “said Blinken, without mentioning the” America First “policy advocated by the Trump administration.

Former President Donald Trump often disguised NATO members during his presidency and previously threatened to leave the alliance.

In December 2019, Trump told NATO leaders in London that too many members are still not making enough financial contributions and are threatening to reduce US military support if allies do not increase spending.

Trump pointed out to Chancellor Angela Merkel that she had not achieved the target of 2% of GDP set at the 2014 NATO summit in Wales.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel (R) watches US President Donald Trump (R) walk past her during a family photo as part of the NATO summit at the Grove Hotel in Watford, northeast of London, on December 4, 2019.

CHRISTIAN HARTMANN

At the time, Germany was only one of 19 NATO members who had not achieved the target of 2% of GDP set at the 2014 summit.

Blinken recognized the difficult transatlantic relationship with defense finances and called for a “more holistic view of burden sharing”.

“We recognize the significant strides made by many of our NATO allies in improving defense investments,” he said, adding that “no single figure fully captures a country’s contribution to defending our collective security and interests, especially in Europe a world where an increasing number of threats cannot be confronted with military force. “

“We have to recognize that because allies have different skills and comparative strengths, they will bear their share of the burden in different ways,” said Blinken.

Categories
Business

How Beijing Turned China’s Covid-19 Tragedy to Its Benefit

A year ago this week, the Chinese Communist Party was on the verge of its biggest crisis in decades. The corona virus brought the city of Wuhan to a standstill. In the days that followed, the government’s efforts to hide the pandemic would go public, sparking an online backlash unlike anything the Chinese internet had seen in years.

Then, when the blows landed faster than the Chinese propaganda machine apparently could handle, some liberal-minded Chinese began to think the unthinkable. Perhaps this tragedy would force the Chinese people to push back. After decades of mind control and the deterioration of censorship, perhaps this was the moment when the world’s largest and most powerful propaganda machine would crack.

It was not.

A year later, party’s control over the narrative has become absolute. In Beijing’s narrative, Wuhan does not stand as evidence of China’s weaknesses, but of its strengths. The memories of the horrors of last year seem to be fading, at least judging by the online content. Even moderate dissent is shouted down.

The people of China should bow their heads this week in memory of those who have suffered and died. Instead, the Chinese internet is on fire over the scandal of a Chinese actress and her surrogate babies, a tabloid controversy sparked by Chinese propaganda.

Anyone looking for lessons about China in the years to come must understand the consequences of what is happening in 2020. The tragedy has shown that Beijing is able to control what people in China see, hear and think to an extent that exceeds even what pessimists believed. During the next crisis – be it a disaster, a war or a financial crisis – the party has shown that it has the means to get people together, no matter how tenacious Beijing is about it.

This week I went through my Chinese social media schedules and screenshots from a year ago. I was shocked at how many posts, articles, photos, and videos were removed. I was also surprised to remember the sense of hope in that moment, despite intense anger and sadness.

The shift was particularly evident on the night that Dr. Li Wenliang, who was silenced after warning of the outbreak in late 2019, died of the virus.

That night, numerous Chinese people led an online riot. They posted videos of the song “Les Misérables” “Can you hear people singing?” They repeatedly shared one of Dr. Li’s quotes: “A healthy society shouldn’t have just one voice.”

Even one of China’s propaganda guidelines warned that Dr. Li’s death was an “unprecedented challenge”. Young people told me that the official news media had lost credibility.

One of my followers on Weibo, the Chinese social media platform, apologized for attacking me earlier. I used to think people like you were bad, he wrote. Now, he added, I know we have been betrayed.

A middle-aged intellectual told me he expected the population of liberal-minded Chinese – those who want more freedom from Beijing’s controls – to grow from its estimate of 5 percent to 10 percent of the total population to 30 to 40 percent.

As those hopes rose, others tried to stifle the excitement. A political scientist suggested that the proportion of liberal-minded Chinese internet users would shrink, not grow. In three months, she predicted, the Chinese public, led by the great communist government, would celebrate the glorious victory over the outbreak.

Updated

Jan. 23, 2021, 9:48 p.m. ET

Unfortunately she was right.

In order to get the narrative back in the early days of the pandemic, as my colleagues have reported, the Chinese government began a tremendous effort behind the scenes to ensure that the censors took control at the local level as well. They listened and read almost everything people had written. Then the censors either addressed the problems or silenced those who thought differently. Chinese officials say police examined or otherwise treated more than 17,000 people who they said they had invented or distributed fake information about pandemics.

The lockdown in Wuhan ended after 11 weeks. By the summer, a photo of a crowded Wuhan swimming pool appeared on the home pages of many websites around the world. China became a success story as infection cases and the death toll skyrocketed in the US and many other Western countries. The contrast made the effectiveness of the party’s strong hand an easy sale.

The Chinese Communist Party has a long history in controlling history. In the United States, historical narratives shift and compete, causing argument and sometimes even violence, but constantly shedding light on new perspectives and providing a better understanding of what underlies national identity. In China, on the other hand, the government has successfully taught its citizens that the country is virtually ungovernable unless a strong hand controls the narrative.

The Communist Party reports severely on its most serious mistakes, including the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution and crackdown on Tiananmen Square. Immediately after the Cultural Revolution, so-called scar literature – memoirs of those who suffered during this difficult time – became a popular genre. The party quickly recognized the danger of the public sharing their individual trauma and banned the books.

Under Xi Jinping, the party has become even less tolerant of unorthodox historical ideas. In 2016, Yanhuang Chunqiu, a monthly history magazine in which moderate retired officials published articles, was forced to cede its editorial powers to the authorities.

The narrative of the current pandemic is no exception. Journalists, writers and bloggers whose account of the outbreak differs from the official version have been arrested, disappeared or silenced.

Fang Fang, a Wuhan-based writer, became the most vilified figure on the Chinese internet in 2020. Your crime? Documentation of their lockdown experiences in an apolitical account in an online diary.

People on the internet call her a liar, a traitor, a villain and an imperialist dog. They accuse her of slandering the government and causing the Chinese people to lose face to the world by publishing an English translation of their diary in the United States. A man asked the government to investigate her for the crime of undermining state power. A high-ranking medical doctor punished her for lack of patriotic feelings.

No publisher is willing or able to publish their works in China. The social media posts and articles they endorse are often censored. Some people who spoke out in favor of them in public were punished, including a literary professor in Wuhan who lost their membership in the Communist Party and their right to teach.

“I think Fang Fang wrote about what happened,” said Amy Ye, the organizer of a volunteer group for disabled people in Wuhan. “In fact, I don’t think she included the most dire situations. Your diary is very moderate. I don’t understand why such a thing could not be tolerated. “

This requirement for a single narrative carries risks. It silences those who might warn the government before it does something stupid like stumbling into conflict or disrupting China’s economic growth machine.

It also hides the real feelings of the Chinese people. On the street, most Chinese people like to tell you what they think, perhaps in great detail. But China became more opaque in 2020. Online censorship got tougher. Few Chinese people are willing to take the risk of speaking to Western news media. Beijing has expelled many American journalists.

This single narrative also means that people who don’t fit in run the risk of being left behind.

Ms. Ye, the volunteer organizer of the Wuhan Group, doesn’t think Wuhan could win a victory over the pandemic. “My whole world has changed and it will probably never go back to what it used to be,” she said.

She is still struggling with depression and the fear of getting out of her apartment. As a pre-pandemic outgoing person, she has only attended one social gathering since lockdown ended in April.

“We were suddenly locked up at home for many days. So many people died. But nobody was held accountable, ”she said. “I would probably feel better if someone could apologize for not doing their job.”

“I can’t forget the pain,” she said. “It’s engraved on my bones and my heart.”

Categories
Business

Jack Ma Seems in Public After Difficult Beijing: Dwell Enterprise Updates

Here’s what you need to know:

Jack Ma has shot action scenes with great martial artists, sang duets with pop stars and has appeared at corporate rallies as a glam rocker and as a masked Michael Jackson impersonator. He’s not a wallflower.

The speculation was rife after the prominent entrepreneur and co-founder of the Alibaba Group disappeared from the public eye late last year. He had criticized the Chinese regulators for their overly cautious stance on the country’s financial system, and the authorities took action against his business empire shortly thereafter. He then began to skip previously planned appearances, raising questions about his fate in China and the global news media.

Mr Ma now appears to be trying to calm the speculation.

On Wednesday he appeared in public for the first time since the end of October. He spoke at a livestream event honoring educators in China’s village schools. He didn’t address his problems, but said he would spend more time in philanthropic endeavors.

“During that time, my colleagues and I learned and thought,” he said, according to a transcript of his comments on the local news media. “We will throw ourselves more resolutely into the philanthropy of education.”

Mr. Ma, a former English teacher, said it was the responsibility of business people of his generation to work towards shared prosperity by revitalizing rural areas and developing village education. His speech was in line with his recent efforts to move away from Alibaba’s day-to-day activities and focus more on philanthropy, although he continues to have significant influence on his business empire.

His remarks were covered extensively in the state-run Chinese news media, which at least indicated that Beijing’s censorship machine approved of his remarks. His appearance made it easier for some investors, who gained around 9 percent in Alibaba’s Hong Kong-traded stocks in afternoon trading.

Mr. Ma, who led Alibaba from its founding in 1999 to its rise as one of the largest and most valuable technology companies in the world, has long been cautious of the Chinese government. Like many entrepreneurs in the country, he has forged ties with the Beijing Office to avoid regulatory issues.

However, the rise of Alibaba’s sister company Ant Group brought it increasingly into conflict with China’s state-dominated financial system. The Ant Group, which was once a subsidiary of Alibaba and provides services such as electronic payments and credit, now plays a huge role in the financial lives of many Chinese people. It had planned an IPO in Shanghai and Hong Kong late last year, which was widely expected to be the largest fundraiser of its kind.

In October, at a public event, Mr. Ma accused Chinese state-run banks of acting like “pawn shops” and the country’s financial regulators to limit innovation through risk obsession.

About a week later, the government stopped the Ant Group’s IPO and later ordered it to change its business practices. Then an antitrust investigation began against Alibaba.

In the midst of the official setback, Mr. Ma began to withdraw from previously planned appearances, including serving as a judge on a talent show he launched on the theme of African entrepreneurs. This sparked speculation, especially after severe penalties were imposed on other entrepreneurs who questioned the Chinese office.

Janet Yellen appears before the Senate Finance Committee Tuesday. Recognition…Anna Moneymaker for the New York Times

Republicans on Tuesday announced their opposition to President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s economic plans and urged Janet L. Yellen, his Treasury candidate, to defend a $ 1.9 trillion stimulus proposal that the more direct payments to individuals would allow unemployment benefits and money for states and cities.

The Republican opposition on the Senate Finance Committee during the confirmation hearing of Ms. Yellen underscored the challenge the future Biden administration will face in trying to get its proposal through Congress as it has one in the Senate and House of Representatives has tight control.

“We’re looking at another loss of spending,” said Senator Patrick J. Toomey, Republican of Pennsylvania. “The only principle of organization that I can apparently understand is to spend as much money as possible, seemingly to spend it.”

Mr Toomey questioned Mr Biden’s plans to send more money to states and cities, a move Republicans opposed last year and which has been removed from the last round of stimulus talks to raise the $ 900 billion Dollar help win package. He also expressed concern about Mr. Biden’s proposed tax hikes and his request to raise the minimum wage to $ 15.

South Carolina Republican Senator Tim Scott took up Mr Biden’s call to raise the $ 7.25 minimum wage, arguing to Ms. Yellen that doing so would harm small businesses while they are vulnerable and result in more job losses.

Other Republicans complained that Biden’s economic plan was fiscally irresponsible given the country’s growing debt burden and the federal budget deficit that exceeded $ 3 trillion last year. Louisiana Republican Senator Bill Cassidy said Mr. Biden’s plan was not targeted enough and that it was not an efficient use of federal resources to provide additional direct payments of $ 1,400 to some people who have lost jobs.

Ms. Yellen dismissed her arguments point by point, arguing that doing too little to stimulate the economy would be more expensive in the long run. She said economic research has shown minimal job losses from raising the minimum wage, citing studies by neighboring states when one imposes an increase and the other does not.

She also argued that unemployment benefits, supplemented by an additional $ 400 per week under Mr. Biden’s plan, are not enough to address families’ financial troubles and that the $ 1,400 stimulus tests are important in situations where a person, generally a woman, is present, has left a job to look after children who are out of school.

“There are many families who face exceptional financial burdens that are not covered by unemployment benefits,” she said.

Ms. Yellen has given some assurances to Republicans who fear the Democrats will repeal the entire 2017 tax bill that cut taxes on individuals and businesses. She said that while Mr Biden would like to make changes to the law, including increasing the corporate tax rate, such measures are not an immediate priority.

“The focus right now is on providing relief and helping families keep a roof over their heads and food on the table, not on collecting taxes,” she said.

The revitalized paycheck protection program is off to a smoother and slower start than last spring, when desperate borrowers inundated banks with loan applications and overwhelmed government computer systems.

The program largely opened on Tuesday when the Small Business Administration, which manages the aid program, accepted applications from all lenders. The agency allowed a small group of lenders and small banks to submit their applications last week.

In the first week of the program, the agency approved around 60,000 applications from nearly 3,000 lenders, it said on Tuesday. These requests totaled $ 5 billion, consuming approximately 2 percent of the $ 284 billion the program makes available.

These numbers don’t include loan applications sent to the agency on Tuesday. This was the first day most lenders were allowed to submit loan applications. New fraud checks and other safeguards mean that most applications will take at least a day to get approval.

The program is open to both first-time and recurring borrowers: the hardest-hit small businesses, which have seen sales declined by at least 25 percent since the pandemic began, are eligible for a second loan.

Lenders said they are preparing for significant demand, particularly second-round loans. John Asbury, the executive director of Atlantic Union Bank in Richmond, Virginia, said he expected at least 60 percent of his bank’s 11,000 borrowers to return for another loan.

Finance officials have announced that funding for the program will be enough to meet all requests. Mr. Asbury hopes that’s true.

“We just don’t know how much rush we’re going to get,” he said. “We get a lot of calls.”

Mike Lindell, the executive director of MyPillow, with President Trump at a White House briefing in March.Recognition…Al Drago for the New York Times

Bed Bath & Beyond and Kohl’s said they would be dropping MyPillow products amid backlash to comments from Mike Lindell, the executive director of the bedding company, who promoted debunked conspiracy theories related to the election on social media.

Kohl’s and Bed Bath & Beyond acted after people put pressure on them on social media, according to an interview posted on a pro-Trump website called the Right Side Broadcasting Network on Monday. Mr Lindell, who said he spoke to Bed Bath & Beyond minutes before the interview, claimed, without citing any evidence, that the criticism came from fake reports.

Bed Bath & Beyond said Tuesday that its decision was based on the performance of MyPillow. “We have streamlined our range to discontinue a number of underperforming items and brands,” a representative said in a statement. A Kohl’s spokeswoman said “customer demand for MyPillow has declined” and that the chain had no plans to purchase future inventory after closing its offer.

Mr. Lindell, whose company is a major advertiser on Fox News, has become a prominent supporter of President Trump. He attracted a wave of attention last week after a photo of partially visible notes he carried into the White House showed a mention of the Insurrection Act. MyPillow also offered a “FightforTrump” discount code on the day of the Capitol Riots. On social media, groups like Sleeping Giants, formed to stifle advertising dollars for Breitbart News, have asked vendors for their support for MyPillow products.

Mr. Lindell railed against Sleeping Giants in the interview.

“These people don’t understand, they are scared,” said Mr. Lindell of Bed Bath & Beyond and Kohl’s. “They were good partners. In fact, I told them, come back whenever you want. “