Categories
Politics

Democratic Insider and a Republican Backed by Trump Win Ohio Home Races

The race was not so much symbolic of a liberal-moderate divide among the Democrats as a clash between an insider who rose quickly in local party circles and an agitator who made a living from alienating party leaders by showing their commitment to liberals Ideals questioned. Both candidates were solidly liberal in their views on a number of issues, including legalizing marijuana and, in some cases, making college more affordable or free.

External political groups from different corners of the democratic coalition invested heavily in the race. Ms. Turner was backed by leftist environmental interests in support of the Green New Deal; the political group founded by Senator Bernie Sanders and once headed Our Revolution; and two progressive groups, the Working Families Party and Justice Democrats.

Ms. Brown was more likely to support institutional actors and politicians such as the Political Committee of the Congressional Black Caucus; several senior members of the caucus; James E. Clyburn Rep. Of South Carolina, Whip of the Democratic House of Representatives; Hillary Clinton; Jewish Democrats; Cleveland Area Black Churches; and unofficially Marcia Fudge, who vacated this year to become Mr. Biden’s Secretary for Housing and Urban Development and agreed to have her mother appear in an advertisement for Ms. Brown because she needed to remain neutral as a government official.

Democratic leaders in Washington and groups often at odds with the progressive left were concerned that a victory by Ms. Turner, who topped double digits in early polls and initially raised more money than Ms. Brown, could herald a new round of hostilities within the party for the Democrats.

And the establishment hit back hard – to a degree that it has not had in previous struggles when candidates with the support of party activists such as New York MPs Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Jamaal Bowman knock out seasoned politicians with little resistance.

This time, while Ms. Ocasio-Cortez and other stars of the left in Ohio were fighting for Ms. Turner, prominent members of the Congressional Black Caucus such as Mr. Clyburn visited the district and implored the people to choose Ms. Brown as someone who was respectful and to be willing to work with fellow Democrats – an implicit criticism of Ms. Turner’s more confrontational style. She was openly criticized by many, such as Mississippi MP Bennie Thompson, who called Ms. Turner a “lonely know-it-all”.

Advertising attacking Ms. Turner’s professionalism and character was ubiquitous in the district in the last days of the campaign. An ad by centrist group Third Way compared Ms. Turner’s political style and tone to that of Mr. Trump, and reiterated a moment on camera when she was struggling for survival during the campaign by making a rough analogy with choosing between Mr. Biden, whom she did not support, and Mr. Trump.

Categories
Health

Elon Musk’s Neuralink backed by Google Ventures, Peter Thiel, Sam Altman

SpaceX Founder and Chief Engineer Elon Musk speaks during the Satellite 2020 Conference in Washington, DC, the United States on March 9, 2020.

Yasin Öztürk | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

Elon Musk’s brain-machine interface company Neuralink has raised $ 205 million from investors including Google Ventures, Peter Thiels Founders Fund and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman.

The Series C round, announced in a blog post on Thursday, was led by Dubai-based Vy Capital.

It comes two years after Neuralink raised $ 51 million. The total investment in the company now amounts to $ 363 million, according to the start-up tracker Crunchbase.

Founded in 2016, Neuralink seeks to develop high bandwidth brain implants that can communicate with phones and computers.

The company is targeting quadriplegics with its first devices – who cannot interact with many of today’s devices – and is working on human studies.

“The first clue this device is for is to help quadriplegics regain their digital freedom by allowing users to interact with their computers or phones in high bandwidth and naturally,” it says.

So far, the technology has been tested on pigs and a monkey that could play the video game pong with its mind.

The company said its first product, known as the N1 Link, will be “completely invisible” after implantation and will transmit data over a wireless connection. Musk, who is the CEO of Neuralink as well as Tesla and SpaceX, previously described Neuralink as a Fitbit in your skull with tiny wires going into your brain.

“The funds from the round will be used to bring Neuralink’s first product to market and accelerate research and development on future products,” said Neuralink.

Keeping up with AI

Neuralink said Thursday its mission is to “develop brain-machine interfaces that treat various brain disorders, with the ultimate goal of creating an entire brain interface that can more closely connect biological and artificial intelligence.”

AI is only getting smarter, and Musk previously said that Neuralink’s technology could one day allow people to “ride on”.

People are practically already “cyborgs” because they have a tertiary “digital layer” thanks to telephones, computers and applications, he said during a clubhouse discussion in February.

“With a direct neural interface, we can improve the bandwidth between your cortex and your digital tertiary layer by many orders of magnitude,” said Musk. “I would say probably at least 1,000 or maybe 10,000 or more.”

The cortex is a part of the brain that plays a key role in memory, attention, perception, thinking, language, and awareness. The digital plane he is referring to can be anything from a person’s iPhone to their Twitter account.

Long-term, Musk claims that Neuralink could enable humans to use telepathy to send concepts to each other and after death to exist in a “stored state” that could then be plugged into a robot or other human. He admitted he was breaking into science fiction territory.

Musk said the Neuralink device will be operational

Neuralink demo

Several other companies are also developing brain-computer interfaces, including Blackrock Neurotech, supported by Thiel and his friend Christian Angermayer.

Elsewhere, scientists from the University of Melbourne have already achieved some success with brain-computer interfaces.

A university study in October showed that two people thought about controlling a computer with a stentrode (a small array of electrodes mounted on a stent) developed by Australian biotech company Synchron, without having to shave and pierce the skull.

The Stentrode brain-computer interface enabled two people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis – a rare neurological disorder – to type, text messages, email, online banking, and make online purchases through thoughts.

Categories
Health

Medical hashish agency backed by Snoop Dogg begins buying and selling in London

Recording artist Snoop Dogg speaks on stage on day one of TechCrunch Disrupt SF 2015 at Pier 70 on September 21, 2015 in San Francisco, California.

Getty Images

LONDON – Oxford Cannabinoid Technologies, happily endorsed by rapper Snoop Dogg and tobacco giant Imperial Brands, launched on the London Stock Exchange on Friday.

The British company, which specializes in developing pain relieving cannabinoid drugs, grossed £ 16.5 million ($ 23.4 million) in gross proceeds on its IPO with a starting market value of just over £ 48 million ($ 69 million) .1 million USD).

The share price hovered around 5p on Friday lunchtime after opening near 8p.

Snoop Dogg, whose real name is Calvin Broadus Jr., has invested in several cannabis startups, including OCT, through his venture capital firm Casa Verde. His firm has also supported plant-based food companies like Outstanding Foods and tech names like Klarna, Robinhood, and Reddit.

Cannabinoids are naturally occurring compound chemicals found in the cannabis sativa plant and are commonly used for medicinal purposes to treat symptoms such as chronic pain.

OCT’s strategy is to develop cannabinoid drugs for the non-addictive treatment of painful conditions. CEO John Lucas told CNBC on Friday the company plans to use the proceeds of its IPO to develop four new drugs.

“The key here is getting cannabinoids into the hands of patients and the way you do that happens through the drug development process,” Lucas told CNBC’s Squawk Box Europe.

“With medical cannabis, the problem is that doctors can’t prescribe it, so we want a drug that we can get into the hands of doctors, into the hands of patients.”

In its listing announcement, OCT said its “primary market focus is on the total addressable pain market, valued at at least £ 42.5 billion through the commercialization of the first drug manufactured by OCT, currently expected in 2027.”

Categories
Politics

Supreme Courtroom rejects Trump backed lawsuit that sought to overturn Biden election victory

United States President Donald Trump looks on during a ceremony to present wrestler Dan Gable with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on December 7, 2020.

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

The United States Supreme Court on Friday rejected an offer tabled by Texas and backed by President Donald Trump in an attempt to undo Joe Biden’s election victories in key swing states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The ruling dealt a death blow to Trump’s desperate and unsuccessful efforts to undo Biden’s planned victory at the electoral college. It took three days for voters to cast their ballots in their respective states and for Biden’s victory to be finalized.

Suffrage experts said from the start that the lawsuit is unlikely to succeed. But Trump, who himself had applied to intervene in the case, had hyped Paxton’s lawsuit as “the big one”.

The court on Friday denied Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to file the lawsuit against the four battlefield states. The judges said Paxton didn’t have reasons to sue the other states over changes they made to their voting procedures amid the coronavirus pandemic.

“The Texas state’s application for permission to file a notice of appeal is denied due to a lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the court said.

“Texas has shown no judicial interest in the way any other state conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as in dispute.”

Trump, who appointed three judges to the nine-member court, had said ahead of the November 3rd election that he believed the Supreme Court would ultimately decide the race.

“I think it is very important that we have nine judges,” Trump said shortly after the death of the liberal judiciary Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September.

Biden spokesman Mike Gwin said in a statement on Friday evening that the court had “decided and quickly rejected the recent attack by Donald Trump and his allies on the democratic process.”

“This is no surprise – dozens of judges, election officials from both parties and Trump’s own attorney general have rejected his baseless attempts to deny that he lost the election,” said Gwin. “The clear and authoritative victory of President-elect Biden will be confirmed by the electoral college on Monday and sworn in on January 20th.”

The Texas lawsuit asked the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results of the four battlefield states by stating that their votes “cannot be counted” in the electoral college.

Biden’s victories in the four states, which together had 62 votes, had brought him over the 270-vote threshold required to secure the presidency. Biden is expected to win 306 votes, compared to 232 for Trump.

If Texas had won the lawsuit, it would have canceled Biden’s victory.

Two of the most conservative Supreme Court justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, said in brief disagreement that they allowed Paxton’s lawsuit to be filed, but added that they would “grant no other relief” requested in the case .

“In my view, there is no discretion to refuse to file a notice of appeal in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction,” Alito wrote in a statement backed by Thomas. “I would therefore grant the request to file the notice of appeal, but would not grant any other relief, and I do not express an opinion on any other subject.”

More than a dozen states in which Trump won the referendum filed briefs in support of Texas’s action. More than 120 Republican members of Congress, including House Minority Chairman Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Filed similar Friend of the Court letters shortly thereafter.

But about two dozen states and territories that Biden had won filed their own pleadings against the Texas appeal.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., In a damning letter from her dear colleague on Friday afternoon, accused the Republicans of supporting the case of “electoral subversion that threatens our democracy”.

“This lawsuit is an act of GOP desperation that violates the principles enshrined in our American democracy,” wrote Pelosi.

“As members of Congress, we take a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution,” her letter said. “The Republicans are undermining the Constitution through their ruthless and fruitless assault on our democracy, which threatens to seriously undermine public confidence in our most sacred democratic institutions and slow our progress on the urgent challenges ahead.”

Rudy Giuliani, the attorney who spearheaded Trump’s efforts to reverse Biden’s victory through legal proceedings, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Senator Ben Sasse, a Republican from Nebraska who has clashed with Trump, said in a statement that the Supreme Court has finally “closed the book on the nonsense.”

“Since election night, a lot of people have puzzled voters by turning the Kenyan birther guy. ‘Chavez carved the election out of the grave conspiracy theories,’ but any rule of law American should take comfort that the Colonel The court – including all three tips from President Trump – closed the book on the nonsense, “he said.

Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel, who represented her state against Paxton’s lawsuit, said the ruling was “an important reminder that we are a nation of laws, and while some may bow to the wishes of a single person, they will.” Courts don’t do this. “

NBC News legal analyst Benjamin Wittes noted that while Alito and Thomas opposed the decision, they likely would have opposed it on the matter.