Categories
World News

U.S. Airstrikes Attempt to Gradual Taliban Advance in Afghanistan

KABUL, Afghanistan — U.S. military aircraft struck a number of Taliban positions this week in support of faltering Afghan government forces, in one of the first significant American reactions to the insurgents’ blistering advance across Afghanistan as U.S. troops withdraw.

At least one of the strikes was against Taliban positions in the key southern city of Kandahar, slowing an advance that threatened to take over the city. Others were in the neighboring province of Helmand, according to a strongly worded Taliban statement.

The Taliban’s harsh language — it called the strikes “disobedience” to last year’s withdrawal agreement with the Americans, and it warned of unspecified “consequences” — was an indication that the airstrikes had an impact on the insurgent group.

The scale and pace of the Taliban advance has provoked alarm among top U.S. military and civilian officials in recent days. The Taliban now threaten most of Afghanistan’s 34 provincial capitals and even Kabul, the national capital. The group has overrun more than half of the country’s 400-odd districts, in many cases seizing them without a fight, since it began its offensive in earnest in May.

This week’s airstrikes, which took place Wednesday and Thursday, appear to be an indication of that U.S. concern and of lingering American involvement in the country despite a nearly completed pullout of U.S. forces after almost 20 years of war. The United States and other major powers are pushing for a peace deal between the Taliban and the Afghan government, but the Taliban believe they are winning the war, leaving little incentive to negotiate.

“We do have deep concerns about the actions the Taliban is taking, indicating that it may be trying to take the country by force,” U.S. Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken said Friday on MSNBC. “But were that to happen, Afghanistan would be a pariah state.”

On Wednesday, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark A. Milley, warned of the possibility of a “complete Taliban takeover,” saying the insurgents now had the “strategic momentum” in the fight against Afghan government forces.

Pentagon officials confirmed the recent American strikes but were tight-lipped about specifics. They have been similarly ambiguous for weeks about the scale and scope of continued American military involvement in Afghanistan’s war, though they indicated earlier this month that it could continue at least until the withdrawal was completed at the end of August.

Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III said this week that American forces had equipped a base in Qatar “to be able to conduct over-the-horizon strikes” in Afghanistan.

As the U.S. pullout accelerated and Bagram Air Base was handed over to the Afghans, American officials suggested that U.S. air power would be employed against the Taliban in limited circumstances, at least through Aug. 31.

But they did not specify what those circumstances would be. This week’s strikes are a sign that the near-collapse of Afghan forces in the last month has caught the attention of official Washington.

The United States no longer has aircraft stationed in Afghanistan. The planes deployed this week would have been based in the Persian Gulf and elsewhere in the Middle East.

“In the last several days, we have acted through airstrikes to support the ANDSF but, I won’t get into tactical details of those strikes,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said at a briefing Thursday, referring to the Afghan forces by their acronym.

He noted Mr. Austin’s statement about the ability to conduct such strikes, adding, “General McKenzie has those authorities,” referring to the head of the Pentagon’s Central Command, Gen. Kenneth F. McKenzie.

A senior Afghan official in Kandahar, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said the American strikes had “boosted the morale of our security forces.” He added that “we are hoping these airstrikes will help to push the Taliban away from the city of Kandahar.”

A B-52 long-range bomber was spotted over Kabul in recent days, for the first time in some years. The plane’s massive size and distinctive silhouette were likely intended as a show of force. The bombers have been moved to Qatar to cover the withdrawal of U.S. and international forces.

Several Pentagon officials confirmed that additional bombing raids around Kandahar are likely in coming days. “We’ve been doing it where and when feasible, and we’ll keep doing it where and when feasible,” one official said, speaking anonymously to describe operational planning.

Even as their military advance continues almost unchecked — though government forces claim to have taken back a handful of districts — the Taliban have become increasingly emboldened. They left top Afghan government officials empty-handed after a peace meeting in Doha, Qatar, last weekend, not even agreeing to the traditional cease-fire over the Eid holiday.

On Tuesday rockets were fired at the presidential palace in Kabul as officials were gathered for Eid prayers, though the attack was later claimed by a branch of Islamic State.

Adam Nossiter reported from Kabul, and Eric Schmitt from Washington, D.C. Taimoor Shah and Thomas Gibbons-Neff contributed reporting.

Categories
Politics

U.S. launched in a single day airstrikes on the Taliban to assist Afghan forces

US Marines from Charlie 1/1 of the 15th MEU (Marine Expeditionary Unit) fill sandbags around their light mortar position at the front of a US Marine Corps base, near a cardboard sign reminding everyone that Taliban troops are everywhere and anywhere in the south could be Afghanistan December 1, 2001.

Jim Hollander | Reuters

WASHINGTON – The United States launched overnight air strikes against the Taliban in Afghanistan, a move reflecting Washington’s intentions to continue to provide fighter jets to the Afghan forces until the US forces withdraw next month.

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby refused to provide any further details about the attacks on Thursday, including the type of aircraft used.

The attacks are the first to become known since Army General Scott Miller, America’s last four-star commander to serve in Afghanistan, stepped down and returned to the United States.

Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin (left) and Joint Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Milley greet Gen. Austin S. Miller, former U.S. Supreme Commander in Afghanistan, upon his return to Andrews Air Force Base, July 14, 2021.

Alex Brandon | Reuters

In April, President Joe Biden ordered the full withdrawal of approximately 3,000 US soldiers from Afghanistan by September 11, effectively ending America’s longest war. Last week, Biden gave an updated schedule, saying the U.S. military mission in Afghanistan will end on August 31st.

“We didn’t go to Afghanistan to build a nation,” said Biden. “It is up to the Afghans to decide the future of their country.”

At the Pentagon, the country’s top military officer told reporters on Wednesday that the US has completed more than 95% of the Herculean task of withdrawing from Afghanistan.

“The sheer volume of movement on this operation was exceptional,” said General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of the US Army, adding that the US had carried out more than 980 air transports of cargo in less than three months.

“In addition, all military bases outside of Kabul were completely handed over to the Afghan Ministry of Defense and the Afghan security forces.”

Last week the White House announced it would begin evacuation flights this month for Afghan nationals and their families who supported U.S. and NATO coalition forces during the longest American war.

Categories
Politics

U.S. Carries Out Airstrikes in Iraq and Syria

WASHINGTON – The United States launched air strikes in Iraq and Syria early Monday morning against two Iran-backed militias that the Pentagon said had carried out drone strikes against American personnel in Iraq in recent weeks, the Department of Defense said.

“On orders from President Biden, US forces launched precision air defensive strikes tonight against facilities used by Iran-backed militias in the Iraqi-Syrian border region,” Pentagon spokesman John F. Kirby said in a statement.

Kirby said the facilities were used by Iranian-backed militias, including Kata’ib Hezbollah and Kata’ib Sayyid al-Shuhada, to store weapons and ammunition for attacks on locations where Americans were in Iraq. There have been no immediate reports of casualties, but a post-action military review is ongoing, Pentagon officials said.

The strikes were the second time Mr Biden ordered the use of force in the area. The United States carried out air strikes in eastern Syria in late February against buildings that the Pentagon said were Iran-backed militias responsible for attacks on American and allied personnel in Iraq.

The most recent attacks were carried out by US Air Force fighter-bombers stationed in the area.

Pentagon planners have been collecting information about the websites and militia networks they use for weeks, American officials said on Sunday. Secretary of Defense Lloyd J. Austin III and General Mark A. Milley, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, briefed Mr Biden on the potential for attack earlier last week, and Mr Biden agreed to attack the three targets, officials said.

The strikes came a little over a week after Iranian hardliner Ebrahim Raisi was elected as his next president.

The military action also came when negotiations aimed at bringing the United States and Tehran back into compliance with an international nuclear deal reached a crucial point. President Donald J. Trump pulled the United States out of the deal in 2018, and Mr Biden tried to revive it.

On Sunday, Foreign Minister Antony J. Blinken discussed the nuclear deal negotiations with Israel’s Foreign Minister Yair Lapid, who said Israel had “serious reservations” about the deal, which would ease sanctions against Iran in return for restrictions on its nuclear weapons program.

Earlier this month, the Biden government blocked access to countless websites related to Iran after the nation held a presidential vote to appoint Mr. Raisi, a close ally of the chief leader of the clerical government, as its highest elected official .

For weeks now, there has been pressure from Democrats and Republicans in Congress, as well as some of Mr Biden’s top advisors and commanders, to crack down on American diplomats and the 2,500 US soldiers in Iraq who train and advise Iraqis against the drone threat avenge forces.

At least five times since April, the Iran-backed militias have deployed small, explosive-laden drones that ricochet bombs on their targets during nighttime attacks on Iraqi bases – including those used by the CIA and US special forces. So far, no Americans have been injured in the attacks, but officials are concerned about the precision of the drones, also known as unmanned aerial vehicles or UAVs

The drones are part of a rapidly evolving threat from Iranian proxies in Iraq, with militias specializing in using more sophisticated weapons to hit some of the most sensitive American targets in attacks that have escaped US defenses.

Iran, weakened by years of tough economic sanctions, is using its proxy militias in Iraq to increase pressure on the United States and other world powers to negotiate easing these sanctions as part of a possible revival of the 2015 nuclear deal. Iraqi and American officials say Iran developed the drone strikes to minimize the number of casualties in order to avoid US retaliation.

American officials said the attacks – against two targets in eastern Syria and a third just across the border in Iraq – were carried out around 1 a.m. local time by a mix of Air Force F-16 and F-15Es stationed in the region.

The fighter-bombers dropped several bombs – £ 500 and £ 2,000 satellite ammunition – on each of the three structures. American officials said the militias used the targeted sites in Syria primarily for storage and logistics purposes; The site hit in Iraq was used to launch and recover the armed drones that officials said were either made in Iran or used Iranian technology.

Kirby and other government officials called the strikes defensive, but leading lawmakers on Sunday called for more details.

“Congress needs to be notified immediately of these air strikes,” said Senator Tim Kaine, Democrat of Virginia, who has led the struggle to limit the president’s powers of war for a decade on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. “If the attacks were against militias using UAVs to attack American personnel, it would be a justified conventional self-defense action. But we need to know more. “

Michael P. Mulroy, a former CIA officer and senior Middle East policy official at the Pentagon, has warned that using the technology provided by the Iranian Quds Force – the outward-facing arm of the Iranian security apparatus – drones are rapidly becoming more sophisticated and relatively minor Costs.

“This action should send a message to Iran that it cannot hide behind its proxy forces to attack the United States and our Iraqi partners,” Mulroy said on Sunday.

But Mr Biden’s top aides have also said they want to avoid the angry rhetorical taunts and threats that Mr Trump often makes with Iran and its deputies in Iraq, and avoid escalating tensions with Tehran at one time in which the White House tries to nail down the nuclear deal.

The February air strikes against the same militias were also a relatively small, carefully calibrated military response: seven 500-pound bombs dropped on a small cluster of buildings at an unofficial border crossing on the Syrian-Iraqi border with the aim of destroying weapons and fighters smuggle.

These earlier attacks took place just across the border in Syria to avoid a diplomatic backlash against the Iraqi government. The same calculation influenced the planning of the attack on Monday – two of the three targets were in Syria along the Iraqi border, and the third was directly on Iraqi territory. The strikes took place early Monday in part to avoid civilian casualties, officials said.

“The United States has taken necessary, appropriate and deliberate measures to limit the risk of escalation – but also to send a clear and unequivocal message of deterrence,” said Kirby.

How the militias and Iran will react is unclear, and American officials said the relatively small air strikes were unlikely to stop the militia strikes entirely. After the February strikes, there was a lull in militias against American sites for weeks, but then an even more dangerous threat emerged: the small armed drones.

Jennifer Steinhauer, Julian Barnes and John Ismay contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Democrats criticize Biden launching airstrikes in Syria with out asking Congress

The U.S. Air Force F-22 fighter jets fly in formation during a military aircraft flyover along the Hudson River and New York Harbor, past York City and New Jersey, the United States, on July 4, 2020.

Facebook Facebook Logo Log in to Facebook to connect with Mike Segar Reuters

Some Senate Democrats on Friday criticized President Joe Biden’s decision to launch an air strike in Syria on Thursday evening without speaking to Congress as a whole.

According to a spokesman for the National Security Council, the Pentagon informed the congressional leadership before the action. House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi was notified prior to the strike, according to a Democratic adviser.

Senator Tim Kaine, D-Va., On Friday requested the Biden government for a briefing on the decision-making behind the airstrikes.

“The American people deserve to hear the government’s reasons for these strikes and their legal justification for acting without coming to Congress. Offensive military action without the approval of Congress is unconstitutional without exceptional circumstances,” a statement said from Caine’s office. Kaine is a member of the Senate Armed Forces Committee.

There will be a fully classified briefing early next week, the NSC spokesman said.

Senator Chris Murphy, D-Conn., Chair of the Foreign Relations Subcommittee, also called for transparency.

“Congress should keep this government on par with previous administrations and require clear legal justifications for military action, especially in theaters like Syria where Congress has not specifically approved American military action,” Murphy said in a statement Friday.

A representative from New York City Senator Chuck Schumer, the top Senate Democrat, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Biden on Thursday directed US military air strikes in eastern Syria against facilities that the Pentagon said were Iran-backed militias in response to recent missile strikes on US targets in Iraq.

In a February 15 attack, missiles struck the US military base in Irbil in the Kurdish-led region, killing a non-US contractor and injuring a number of US contractors and a US service member. Another volley days later hit a base where US forces were stationed north of Baghdad, injuring at least one contractor. On Monday, missiles hit the Baghdad Green Zone, where the US embassy and other diplomatic missions are located.

“It’s hard to say for sure if there is some strategic computation driving this … recent surge in attacks, or if this is just a continuation of the kind of attacks we have seen in the past,” said John Kirby, Pentagon press secretary gave a briefing Monday.

“We will hold Iran responsible for the attacks and the provocations of its deputies,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Ned Price said in a separate briefing on Monday. The missile attack in Irbil “continues to be actively investigated,” he said.

Thursday’s US air strikes earned Biden rare praise from across the aisle. Senator Lindsey Graham, RS.C., thanked Biden for moving.

In 2018, then President Donald Trump ordered military strikes in Syria. The move also sparked criticism from Democrats.

“The president needs to come to Congress and secure authorization to use military force by proposing a comprehensive strategy with clear objectives that will protect our military,” Pelosi tweeted at the time.

– Reuters contributed to this report.