Categories
World News

The Relics of America’s Battle in Afghanistan

BAGRAM, Afghanistan – For nearly 20 years, Bagram Air Force Base in Afghanistan was the anchor for America’s war, its two sprawling runways serving for bombing, homeward travel, medical evacuations, mail trips and USO shows.

But despite years of preparation for this moment, the departure of the Americans in Bagram last week was marked by little fanfare, apparently as incoherent as the Afghan government’s plan for the next steps.

For weeks the Taliban have been carrying out attacks across the country, killing members of the Afghan security forces and forcing hundreds to surrender. Across the country, warlords – power brokers from the 1990s civil war and new militia commanders – are calling on Afghan civilians to join their makeshift armies in defense of the country.

The clash of government forces, Taliban fighters, warlords and citizen militias signals that the violence will almost certainly worsen. The U.S. military is expected to leave the country entirely by September 11th as President Biden keeps his promise to bring the American forces home from the nation’s longest foreign war.

The new tenants in Bagram are the Afghan security forces, who will inherit the conflict the US built for them, as well as fields of military equipment, vehicles and weapons that will long represent the grim legacy of the war and the country’s uncertain future .

To continue the fight, the United States has left its tan and green pickups and Humvees behind, along with its Hesco barriers, the cube-shaped, dirt-filled boxes that were used to build and protect American, now Afghan, outposts.

But so many US-supplied weapons have been captured, bought, or stolen by the insurgents that it would be difficult to verify the facts if the Taliban said they had more American M16s than Russian Kalashnikovs. Even the U.S. Special Inspector General overseeing the war in Afghanistan isn’t sure how many American firearms have been sent into the country to support the security forces in the past two decades.

The physical objects left behind are reminiscent of decades of losses – appalling numbers of deaths on all sides, especially among Afghan civilians, as well as devastating injuries. Also, the failed strategies cobbled together by a number of American generals are now part of history who said everything was on schedule and everything was going well.

About a mile from the air force base that American forces left behind on Thursday evening is a squat row of brick and steel shops with Afghan vendors, the custodians of the physical relics that were dropped from trucks and recovered from piles of rubbish. A black coffee mug labeled “Been there… done that, Operation Enduring Freedom” is just one of thousands of items that tell a story from what was once considered “the good war”.

Hashmatullah Gulzada was behind the counter in one of those stores, a closet-sized store he opened a year ago after working as a truck driver. The cramped spaces were filled from floor to ceiling with war relics, snacks, bags, and personal care products.

The quiet resignation of shopkeepers like Mr Gulzada has been reverberating for some time in Bagram, a city of vines and an economy that depends on the garbage from an airport that has been used by two superpowers for the past 40 years.

Even with some of the last American cargo planes to depart on that day in late June, Mr. Gulzada was still not entirely sure that the United States would depart in full.

“If they leave, business will be bad,” said Mr Gulzada.

Near the windowsill was a single red rip-it, the sugar- and caffeine-rich energy drink that kept thousands of US and NATO troops awake on patrol or in the cabs of armored vehicles so big the Afghans saw them Call tanks.

Mr Gulzada says Rip It costs 120 afghanis, about $ 1.50, a high price linked to the love of energy drinks that Afghan youth developed after the 2001 US invasion. (A billboard from Rip It in Kabul, the capital, testifies to this devotion).

On the floor of his shop, in a pile of knickknacks and shampoo bottles, lies a weathered black stripe with wide Velcro straps known as a “combat application tourniquet”. Almost every American soldier and contractor traveling through Afghanistan carried one with them as its ease of use has saved many lives.

More than 20,000 US soldiers were wounded in Afghanistan. (Another 1,897 were killed in combat and 415 died of “non-hostile” reasons.) The combat tourniquet was in many cases, a staple in the roadside bomb slaughter or armed attack, fumbled out of a pouch and slipped hastily up some mutilated limb and tightened until the bleeding stopped.

Mr Gulzada sells the tourniquet for about 25 cents less than Rip It. Medical vendors buy it, shopkeepers say, along with the foldable American stretchers that carried the wounded and dead across the battlefield that are now for sale. They merge with a few artificial Christmas trees from the pedestal that found their way into stores.

The Christmas decorations probably adorned the corners of a staff office at the airfield in one place or another. Bagram Air Force Base ballooned from a partially destroyed former Soviet military airfield when the Americans arrived in a mini-town in 2001 at the height of the war in 2011. It had tens of thousands of residents, fast food restaurants, shops, and an infamous military prison that was later turned over to the Afghans.

But Bagram, as it was then, was dismantled, slowly at first, as the U.S. presence waned. As they left, the Americans destroyed things like armored cars and more than 15,000 other pieces of equipment that were considered surplus property, a collective term that allows U.S. forces to destroy items so they won’t be sold for profit by Afghans.

Farid, another shopkeeper on the Strip who uses a name like many Afghans, said most of the material that has left the base in recent weeks has been destroyed and disposed of as trash, which helped the scrappers, but little available posed to fill its shelves.

Not everything was dismantled or ruined. Under a cot in another store lay a pair of used brown combat boots, a trademark of the nearly 800,000 US soldiers who have rotated around Afghanistan in the past two decades.

Their distinctive prints enabled the Taliban to track down American patrols in the desert-covered south. In the inexorable terrain of the east, such as the Korengal Valley, boots quickly broke when soldiers made strenuous climbs and forged ice-cold streams.

To Americans, the boots were what they saw as they stared at the earth one step at a time, one patrol after another, wondering if their weight would set off a roadside bomb buried underneath.

After all these years of fighting, many of the places where US and international troops marched are in the hands of the Taliban. This is especially true now as the insurgent group draws closer and closer to Kabul and districts are falling one by one by military force or other means. The Afghan forces have recaptured some, but not nearly enough to break the momentum of the offensive.

Even today, the Taliban are less than 80 kilometers away from Bagram, which can be clearly felt in the shops near the base. A shopkeeper who refused to give his name pointed to a bulletproof plate used in body armor and said it was no longer for sale.

“This is for us,” he said. “Tomorrow will be war.”

Fatima Faizi contributed to the coverage.

Categories
World News

C.I.A. Scrambles for New Method in Afghanistan

WASHINGTON — The rapid U.S. military withdrawal from Afghanistan is creating intense pressure on the C.I.A. to find new ways to gather intelligence and carry out counterterrorism strikes in the country, but the agency has few good options.

The C.I.A., which has been at the heart of the 20-year American presence in Afghanistan, will soon lose bases in the country from where it has run combat missions and drone strikes while closely monitoring the Taliban and other groups such as Al Qaeda and the Islamic State. The agency’s analysts are warning of the ever-growing risks of a Taliban takeover.

United States officials are in last-minute efforts to secure bases close to Afghanistan for future operations. But the complexity of the continuing conflict has led to thorny diplomatic negotiations as the military pushes to have all forces out by early to mid-July, well before President Biden’s deadline of Sept. 11, according to American officials and regional experts.

One focus has been Pakistan. The C.I.A. used a base there for years to launch drone strikes against militants in the country’s western mountains, but was kicked out of the facility in 2011, when U.S. relations with Pakistan unraveled.

Any deal now would have to work around the uncomfortable reality that Pakistan’s government has long supported the Taliban. In discussions between American and Pakistani officials, the Pakistanis have demanded a variety of restrictions in exchange for the use of a base in the country, and they have effectively required that they sign off on any targets that either the C.I.A. or the military would want to hit inside Afghanistan, according to three Americans familiar with the discussions.

Diplomats are also exploring the option of regaining access to bases in former Soviet republics that were used for the Afghanistan war, although they expect that President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia would fiercely oppose this.

Recent C.I.A. and military intelligence reports on Afghanistan have been increasingly pessimistic. They have highlighted gains by the Taliban and other militant groups in the south and east, and warned that Kabul could fall to the Taliban within years and return to becoming a safe haven for militants bent on striking the West, according to several people familiar with the assessments.

As a result, U.S. officials see the need for a long-term intelligence-gathering presence — in addition to military and C.I.A. counterterrorism operations — in Afghanistan long after the deadline that Mr. Biden has set for troops to leave the country. But the scramble for bases illustrates how U.S. officials still lack a long-term plan to address security in a country where they have spent trillions of dollars and lost more than 2,400 troops over nearly two decades.

William J. Burns, the C.I.A. director, has acknowledged the challenge the agency faces. “When the time comes for the U.S. military to withdraw, the U.S. government’s ability to collect and act on threats will diminish,” he told senators in April. “That is simply a fact.”

Mr. Burns made an unannounced visit in recent weeks to Islamabad, Pakistan, to meet with the chief of the Pakistani military and the head of the directorate of Inter-Services Intelligence, the country’s military intelligence agency. Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III has had frequent calls with the Pakistani military chief about getting the country’s help for future U.S. operations in Afghanistan, according to American officials familiar with the conversations.

Mr. Burns did not bring up the base issue during his trip to Pakistan, according to people briefed on the meeting; the visit focused on broader counterterrorism cooperation between the two countries. At least some of Mr. Austin’s discussions have been more direct, according to people briefed on them.

A C.I.A. spokeswoman declined to comment when asked about Mr. Burns’s travel to Pakistan.

Two decades of war in Afghanistan have helped transform the spy agency into a paramilitary organization: It carries out hundreds of drone strikes in Afghanistan and Pakistan, trains Afghan commando units and maintains a large presence of C.I.A. officers in a string of bases along the border with Pakistan. At one point during President Barack Obama’s first term, the agency had several hundred officers in Afghanistan, its largest surge of personnel to a country since the Vietnam War.

These operations have come at a cost. Night raids by C.I.A.-trained Afghan units left a trail of abuse that increased support for the Taliban in parts of the country. Occasional errant drone strikes in Pakistan killed civilians and increased pressure on the government in Islamabad to dial back its quiet support for C.I.A. operations.

Douglas London, a former head of C.I.A. counterterrorism operations for Afghanistan and Pakistan, said that the agency was likely to rely on a “stay behind” network of informants in Afghanistan who would collect intelligence on the Taliban, Al Qaeda, the stability of the central government and other topics. But without a large C.I.A. presence in the country, he said, vetting the intelligence would be a challenge.

“When you’re dealing offshore, you’re dealing with middlemen,” said Mr. London, who will soon publish a book, “The Recruiter,” about his C.I.A. experience. “It’s kind of like playing telephone.”

In the short term, the Pentagon is using an aircraft carrier to launch fighter planes in Afghanistan to support the troop withdrawal. But the carrier presence is unlikely to be a long-term solution, and military officials said it would probably redeploy not long after the last U.S. forces leave.

Updated 

June 4, 2021, 7:27 p.m. ET

The United States is stationing MQ-9 Reaper drones in the Persian Gulf region, aircraft that can be used by both the Pentagon and the C.I.A. for intelligence collection and strikes.

But some officials are wary of these so-called over the horizon options that would require plane and drones to fly as many as nine hours each way for a mission in Afghanistan, which would make the operations more expensive because they require more drones and fuel, and also riskier because reinforcements needed for commando raids could not arrive swiftly during a crisis.

Pakistan is a longtime patron of the Taliban; it sees the group as a critical proxy force in Afghanistan against other groups that have ties to India. Pakistan’s spy agency provided weapons and training for Taliban fighters for years, as well as protection for the group’s leaders. The government in Islamabad is unlikely to sign off on any U.S. strikes against the Taliban that are launched from a base in Pakistan.

Although some American officials believe Pakistan wants to allow U.S. access to a base as long as it can control how it is used, public opinion in the country has been strongly against any renewed presence by the United States.

Pakistan’s foreign minister, Shah Mehmood Qureshi, told lawmakers last month that the government would not allow the U.S. military to return to the country’s air bases. “Forget the past, but I want to tell the Pakistanis that no U.S. base will be allowed by Prime Minister Imran Khan so long he is in power,” Mr. Qureshi said.

Some American officials said that negotiations with Pakistan had reached an impasse for now. Others have said the option remains on the table and a deal is possible.

The C.I.A. used the Shamsi air base in western Pakistan to carry out hundreds of drone strikes during a surge that began in 2008 and lasted during the early years of the Obama administration. The strikes focused primarily on suspected Qaeda operatives in Pakistan’s mountainous tribal areas, but they also crossed the border into Afghanistan.

Pakistan’s government refused to publicly acknowledge that it was allowing the C.I.A. operations, and in late 2011 it decided to halt the drone operations after a series of high-profile events that fractured relations with the United States. They included the arrest of a C.I.A. contractor in Lahore for a deadly shooting, the secret American commando mission in Pakistan to kill Osama bin Laden and an American-led NATO airstrike on the Afghan border in November 2011 that killed dozens of Pakistani soldiers.

The Americans and the Pakistanis “will want to proceed cautiously” with a new relationship, said Husain Haqqani, a former Pakistani ambassador to the United States who is now a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute. But, he said, Mr. Biden’s announcement of a withdrawal “has the C.I.A. and the Defense Department, as well as Pakistanis, scrambling.”

American diplomats have been exploring options to restore access to bases in Central Asia, including sites in Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan that housed American troops and intelligence officers during the war.

Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken spoke this month with his counterpart in Tajikistan, though it is not clear if base access was discussed during the call. Any negotiations with those countries are likely to take considerable time to work out. A State Department spokeswoman would say only that Mr. Blinken was engaging partner countries on how the United States was reorganizing its counterterrorism capabilities.

Russia has opposed the United States using bases in Central Asia, and that is likely to make any diplomatic effort to secure access to bases for the purposes of military strikes a slow process, according to a senior American official.

While the C.I.A. in particular has long had a pessimistic view of the prospects of stability in Afghanistan, those assessments have been refined in recent weeks as the Taliban has made tactical gains.

While military and intelligence analysts have previously had assessments at odds with one another, they now are in broad agreement that the Afghan government is likely to have trouble holding on to power. They believe the Afghan security forces have been depleted by high casualty rates in recent years. The announcement of the U.S. withdrawal is another psychological blow that could weaken the force.

Intelligence assessments have said that without continued American support, the Afghan National Security Forces will weaken and could possibly collapse. Officials are working to develop options for continuing that support remotely, but the Pentagon has not yet come up with a realistic plan that officials believe will work.

Some current and former officials are skeptical that remote advising or combat operations will succeed. Collecting intelligence becomes far more difficult without a large presence in Afghanistan, said Mick P. Mulroy, a retired C.I.A. officer who served there.

“It doesn’t matter if you can drop ordnance,” he said, “if you don’t know where the target is.”

Eric Schmitt contributed reporting.

Categories
World News

Pentagon Accelerates Withdrawal From Afghanistan

In order to keep an eye on the military situation on the ground, the US military would like to continue to use a version of the so-called combined situation awareness room, in which it coordinates with its Afghan colleagues (often via WhatsApp), passes on information and provides air support and other forces on the Battlefield. However, it remains unclear where the command center would be, with options like the American embassy or out of the country.

Although the Afghan Air Force has become increasingly powerful in recent years, American drones and other surveillance aircraft are still providing important target information. And although US strikes have been reduced under extremely restrictive rules of engagement, they still occur when international forces depart and Afghan security forces struggle to assert themselves.

US military officials believe the United States will deploy significant numbers of reconnaissance aircraft to continue to aid the Afghan armed forces, but will limit air strikes only to “counter-terrorism operations,” a loose description used in the past to denote one Justify variety of actions.

In the absence of bases to position aircraft near Afghanistan, American aircraft must fly from bases in the Middle East or from aircraft carriers in the Arabian Sea to support Afghan forces or conduct counter-terrorism missions from “over the horizon”.

For surveillance drones and propeller-driven aircraft, this means journeys of several hours just to get to Afghanistan.

For jets based on aircraft carriers, this means frequent refueling stops in the air. As US land-based jets leave Afghanistan, US forces struggle to meet demand for aircraft carriers as tankers have to refuel. Currently, the jets aboard the USS Eisenhower in the Arabian Sea can only handle around 75 percent of inquiries about Afghanistan, a military official said.

General Kenneth F. McKenzie Jr., head of Pentagon Central Command, was asked by lawmakers last month about the challenges of countering terrorist threats in Afghanistan after American troops left is not impossible. “

Categories
Politics

U.S. army continues Afghanistan withdrawal as Israel-Gaza violence ensues

Lance Cpl. Patrick Reeder, with Combined Anti-Armor Team 2, patrols Nawa district, Helmand province, Afghanistan, Oct. 28, 2009.

Marine Corps photo by Lance Cpl. James Purschwitz

WASHINGTON – Since President Joe Biden’s decision to withdraw troops from Afghanistan, the US has completed up to 20% of the withdrawal process from the country, the US Central Command said on Tuesday.

Command monitored the removal of approximately 115 loads of equipment in C-17 Globemaster transport aircraft. More than 5,000 pieces of equipment that will not be handed over to the Afghan military have also been handed over to the Defense Logistics Agency for destruction.

The US has also officially handed over five facilities to the Afghan military. Central Command estimates the US has completed between 13% and 20% of the withdrawal process so far.

In April, Biden announced a full withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan by September 11, ending America’s longest war.

The removal of approximately 3,000 US soldiers coincides with the 20th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks that spurred America’s entry into protracted wars in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Biden’s withdrawal schedule breaks with a proposed deadline agreed by the Trump administration and the Taliban last year. All foreign armed forces should have left Afghanistan by May 1 under this agreement.

Last month, the White House confirmed that US troops had begun withdrawing from Afghanistan. The Pentagon was proactively deploying additional troops and military equipment to protect the armed forces in the area, the government said.

The central command has not disclosed the number of troops currently stationed there due to operational security measures.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters on Monday that the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas will not curb the Biden government’s ambitions to complete a full withdrawal from Afghanistan.

In a phone call Monday afternoon with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Biden raised concerns about the rising civilian death toll and called for a ceasefire.

Violence between militants from Israel and Hamas has increased for more than a week. Israeli strikes in the Gaza Strip have resulted in at least 212 Palestinian deaths, according to the authorities there.

Meanwhile, Israel has said that more than 3,400 rockets have bombed its cities. At least 12 people have died in Israel.

The violence marked the largest escalation of the conflict in years. On Tuesday, the European Union became the youngest organization to call for a ceasefire.

Categories
World News

U.S. sends extra firepower to Center East as troops withdraw from Afghanistan

A U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle, piloted by a member of the 494th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron, takes off from Al Dhafra Air Base in the United Arab Emirates on April 30, 2021 in support of regional security operations.

Staff Sgt. Zade Vadnais | U.S. Air Force photo

WASHINGTON – The Pentagon has augmented its military assets in the Middle East as US-NATO coalition forces begin the daunting task of withdrawing from Afghanistan.

This week, two more US Air Force B-52 Stratofortress strategic bombers arrived at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar, bringing the total number of B-52s ready to respond to a Taliban attack to six.

“We have made it extraordinarily clear that protecting our armed forces and the forces of our allies and partners is also a priority in the withdrawal. This is a top priority,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby told reporters on Wednesday.

“We have made plans to introduce additional ground force capabilities to make sure again that this is safe and orderly,” added Kirby. The Pentagon also expanded the operation of a US Navy strike group in the area and deployed a dozen F-18 fighter jets to provide additional support.

Kirby has previously said that U.S. Central Command, the combatant command that oversees U.S. operations in the Middle East, will continue to assess the need for additional military capabilities as U.S. and coalition forces advance.

A B-52H Stratofortress aircraft assigned to the 5th Bomb Wing at Minot Air Force Base, North Dakota, arrives at Al Udeid Air Base, Qatar on May 4, 2021.

Staff Sgt. Greg Erwin | U.S. Air Force photo

“The president has decided to end America’s involvement in our longest war, and we are going to do just that. And so far, in less than a week, the drawdown is going according to plan,” Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin told reporters at the Pentagon on Thursday .

“We’re focused on making sure we can roll back our resources, our troops, and our allies in a safe, orderly, and responsible manner,” Austin said, adding that the Department of Defense is planning on hoping for support from Congress in the future to provide financial assistance to Afghan armed forces.

Last week, the White House confirmed that US troops had begun withdrawing from Afghanistan and that the Pentagon was proactively deploying additional troops and military equipment to protect the armed forces in the area.

“Potential opponents should know that if they attack us as we retreat, we will defend ourselves. [and] our partners, with all the tools at our disposal, “White House deputy press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters traveling on Air Force One.

“While these measures will initially lead to an increase in the armed forces, we continue to advocate evicting all US military personnel from Afghanistan by September 11, 2021,” she said, adding that the Biden administration is unifying Intended “safe and responsible” exit from the war-torn country.

The crew assigned to Al Udeid Air Base in Qatar carry their gear into a C-17 Globemaster III assigned to the Joint Base in Charleston, South Carolina on April 27, 2021.

Staff Sgt. Kylee Gardner | U.S. Air Force photo

In April, Biden announced a full withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan by September 11, ending America’s longest war.

The removal of approximately 3,000 US soldiers coincides with the 20th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks that spurred America’s entry into protracted wars in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Biden’s withdrawal schedule breaks with a proposed deadline agreed with the Taliban by the Trump administration last year. According to this agreement, all foreign armed forces should have left Afghanistan by May 1st.

Since Biden’s decision to leave the country, the US has removed the equivalent of approximately 60 C-17 Globemaster loads from Afghanistan, according to an update from Central Command. More than 1,300 pieces of equipment that will not be handed over to the Afghan military have also been handed over to the Defense Logistics Agency for destruction.

The US has also officially handed over a facility to the Afghan military. So far, Central Command estimates the US has completed between 2% and 6% of the withdrawal process.

Categories
Politics

U.S. begins Afghanistan withdrawal, deploys army property to guard troops

U.S. Marines board a U.S. Marine Corps MV-22B Osprey in Helmand province, Afghanistan.

Cpl. Alejandro Pena | U.S. Marine Corps Photo

WASHINGTON – The White House confirmed Thursday that the U.S. military has begun its withdrawal from Afghanistan and has proactively deployed additional troops and military equipment to protect the armed forces in the area.

“Potential opponents should know that if they attack us as we retreat, we will defend ourselves. [and] our partners, with all the tools at our disposal, “White House deputy press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters traveling on Air Force One.

“While these measures will initially lead to an increase in the armed forces, we continue to advocate evicting all US military personnel from Afghanistan by September 11, 2021,” she said, adding that the Biden administration is unifying Intended “safe and responsible” exit from the war-torn country.

The Pentagon has temporarily delivered B-52H Stratofortress aircraft to US Central Command, the combatant command that oversees American operations in the Middle East. A US Navy strike group is also in the area to provide assistance.

Pentagon spokesman John Kirby has previously said that the Department of Defense leadership will continue to consider the need for additional military capabilities as U.S. and coalition forces continue to migrate.

Earlier this month, Biden announced a full withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan by September 11, ending America’s longest war.

The removal of approximately 3,000 US soldiers coincides with the 20th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks that spurred America’s entry into protracted wars in the Middle East and Central Asia.

Biden’s withdrawal schedule breaks with a proposed deadline agreed with the Taliban by the Trump administration last year. According to this agreement, all foreign armed forces should have left Afghanistan by May 1st.

Categories
Politics

Taliban will not take over Afghanistan after U.S. troops depart, ambassador says

Zalmay Khalilzad, Special Envoy for Afghan Reconciliation, testifies before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee during a hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington on April 27, 2021.

TJ Kirkpatrick | Pool | Reuters

The nation’s chief representative in Afghanistan said Tuesday he does not believe the Afghan government will collapse after US and foreign troops left the war-torn country later this year.

“I don’t think the government will collapse or the Taliban will take power,” said US special envoy for Afghanistan, Zalmay Khalilzad, during a testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Khalilzad’s testimony comes after President Joe Biden announced that the US would complete its troop withdrawal from Afghanistan by September 11, effectively ending America’s longest war.

The decision to leave Afghanistan sparked a number of reactions in Washington, with lawmakers on both sides of the aisle praising and criticizing the move. It has also raised some concern within the highest levels of the military.

Last week, the chief of the U.S. Middle East Forces told lawmakers he was concerned that the Afghan military would collapse following the withdrawal of U.S. and foreign troops.

“I am concerned about the ability of the Afghan military to hold fast after we leave, the ability of the Afghan Air Force to fly, especially after we remove support for these aircraft,” McKenzie, head of US Central Command, said during an Armed Forces committee hearing of the Senate on April 22nd.

The Afghan armed forces had got used to the support of the military of the US and other nations over several years.

Later at the Pentagon, McKenzie told reporters that while the US will continue to provide remote assistance to Afghanistan, he was particularly concerned about aircraft maintenance.

The machines are largely serviced by contractors from the United States and other countries, he explained. The US intends to find innovative ways to replace these services without having boots in place, he added.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Categories
World News

US Navy Begins Remaining Withdrawal from Afghanistan

KABUL, Afghanistan – The US military has begun its full withdrawal from Afghanistan, the American commander in chief said Sunday, marking the beginning of the end of the United States’ nearly 20-year-old war in the country.

“I now have a number of orders,” said General Austin S. Miller, head of the US-led coalition in Afghanistan, at a press conference by Afghan journalists at the US military headquarters in Kabul, the capital. “We will conduct an orderly withdrawal from Afghanistan, and that means that bases and equipment will be handed over to the Afghan security forces.”

General Miller’s remarks come nearly two weeks after President Biden announced that all US forces would be out of the country by September 11, the 20th anniversary of the terrorist attacks that drove the United States in its long war in Afghanistan.

Mr Biden’s announcement was received with uncertainty in Afghanistan as it prepares for a future without a US and NATO military presence, despite a Taliban uprising that appears poised for military victory despite peace talks.

If the Taliban return to power – either through violence or through incorporation into government – they will likely take back women’s rights, as they did during their harsh rule in the late 1990s.

For now, the Afghan security forces, which have survived a particularly difficult winter, are holding the line. Taliban offensives in the south and repeated attacks in the north despite the cold weather have resulted in increasing casualties ahead of a potentially violent summer in which US and NATO forces are retreating. Although the Afghan military and police combined are believed to have around 300,000 employees, the real number is believed to be much lower.

“I am often asked how the security forces are doing. Can the security guards do the work in our absence? “General Miller said. “And my message has always been the same: you have to be ready.”

General Miller added that “certain equipment” must be withdrawn from Afghanistan, “but wherever possible,” the United States and international forces will leave material for the Afghan forces.

There are approximately 3,500 US troops in Afghanistan and approximately 7,000 NATO and Allied forces. These NATO forces are likely to pull out along with the United States as many countries in the coalition depend on American support.

At the head of the international armed forces in Afghanistan there are also around 18,000 contractors in the country, almost all of whom will also be leaving. General Miller said some of the treaties “need to be adjusted” to continue to support the Afghan security forces, which rely heavily on contractor support, particularly the Afghan Air Force. The thousands of private contractors in Afghanistan perform a variety of roles including security, logistics, and aircraft maintenance.

According to last year’s peace agreement with the Taliban, US and international forces should withdraw from the country by May 1. Under the deal, the Taliban have largely refrained from attacking US troops. However, it remains unclear whether the insurgent group will attack the withdrawing forces after Mr Biden decided to set the final deadline later in September.

“We have the military means and the ability to fully protect our armed forces and support the Afghan security forces during retrograde development,” said General Miller.

American troops are still spread out in a constellation of around a dozen bases, most of which contain small groups of special forces advising the Afghan military. To cover the withdrawal, the American military has provided significant air support, including positioning an aircraft carrier in the Persian Gulf in case the Taliban decide to attack.

Categories
Politics

Biden’s Plan to Finish Afghanistan Struggle Offers Some Detainees Hope for Launch

However, this left unanswered the question of what it would mean if Afghanistan were no longer an active zone of armed conflict, even if the fighting raged thousands of kilometers away elsewhere.

Mr Haroon’s case could be stronger because he is an Afghan national, unlike other detainees who the government says went to Afghanistan to join Osama bin Laden’s Islamist movement. There is only one other Afghan in Guantánamo, Muhammad Rahim, 55, but he presents a more complex case.

He was originally held in CIA custody as a “high-quality prisoner”, and his 2016 intelligence profile describes him as a courier and mediator for al-Qaeda – including bin Laden – who had already been informed of the 9/11 attacks. He was never charged with war crimes.

If the evidence is strong that Mr. Rahim worked directly for al-Qaeda, the government can argue that war violence persists to prevent him from returning to battle even after the war between the United States in Afghanistan is over. But his attorney, Cathi Shusky, a federal defender in Ohio, argued that the evidence was weak.

“There is a reasonable explanation that he was not part of either al Qaeda or the Taliban,” said Ms. Shusky, who said many details of his case have been classified, which prevented her from delving into it. “The narrative is a bit twisted. I think when the facts are fully revealed it will show that his continued detention is not lawful. “

A U.S. military representative for Mr. Rahim told a management review committee in March 2016 that Mr. Rahim regretted his past and wanted to return to his two wives and seven children in Afghanistan. His motives are not ideological, said the representative, but “he only did what he had done for money so that he could support his family.”

His federal court release was on hold for years while he sought release from the board, which repeatedly declared his detention a national security requirement. But Ms. Shusky said she and another lawyer planned to revive his habeas corpus case in light of the decision to withdraw from Afghanistan.

Categories
Politics

Biden, Setting Afghanistan Withdrawal, Says ‘It Is Time to Finish the Endlessly Warfare’

Mr. Bush chose not to publicly question Mr. Biden’s decision.

“As he has maintained since leaving office, President Bush will refuse to comment on private phone calls or his successors,” said Freddy Ford, his chief of staff.

A number of Afghan governments failed to maintain control of large parts of the country for years after the first invasion. This is at the core of the American military’s “keep clear, build” strategy. While a number of Afghan leaders, backed by the United States and its allies, pledged to fight corruption, end the drug scourge and establish stable governance, all of these achievements have proven fragile at best.

Women have played a more prominent role in government, and girls have been trained to an extent not seen before the war began. However, the future of these achievements is in doubt if the Taliban gain more ground.

In a statement on Twitter, President Ashraf Ghani of Afghanistan said his country “respects the US decision and we will work with our US partners to ensure a smooth transition.” He added that his country’s security forces are “fully capable of defending its people”.

But privately, according to people who spoke to him, Mr. Ghani was annoyed about the American decision. He fears that this will encourage the Taliban and give them little to no incentive to stick to the terms of the deal they made with Mr. Trump a year ago. And many around Mr Ghani fear that his own government, whose influence has already waned, could fall if the Taliban decide to take the capital, Kabul.

“Just because we’re pulling out of Afghanistan doesn’t mean the war is over,” said Lisa Curtis, one of Trump’s top national security officials on Afghanistan. “It’s likely to get worse.”

Mr Biden is the first president to oppose the Pentagon’s recommendations that any withdrawal be “conditional,” meaning that security must be ensured on the ground before Americans withdraw. If military officials have argued for a long time, they would signal the Taliban to just wait for the Americans – after that they would offer little resistance to taking further control and possibly threatening Kabul.