Categories
Business

‘We Had been Flying Blind’: A Dr.’s Account of a Lady’s J.&J. Vaccine-Associated Blood Clot Case

Dr. Lipman said when the team examined her blood samples the pieces started to fit and they discovered that she appeared to have the same problem that they knew had occurred in the UK and Europe after patients took the AstraZeneca Received the vaccine. mostly in young women. They switched from heparin to another blood thinner and followed instructions from doctors in the UK who had treated AstraZeneca recipients with a similar disorder.

Hoping for more information about the condition and a possible association with the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, Dr. Lipman to call the Food and Drug Administration for an emergency number. It was a weekend and he said the person who answered told him that there was no one available to help and that the line should be kept open for emergencies.

“I thought this was an emergency,” said Dr. Lipman. “She hang up.”

He called back to ask how to contact Janssen, who makes the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. That information was not available, and he said the person who responded also told him that the FDA was unable to provide advice on patient care.

An FDA spokeswoman, Stephanie Caccomo, said in an email, “We will continue to investigate to ensure doctors who ask for help from the FDA are getting the help they are looking for.”

Dr. Lipman said the pharmacist at his hospital filed an online report with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in early April, but the agency didn’t contact him until this week to inquire about the case. The agency declined to comment on whether they were with Dr. Lipman had communicated, a spokeswoman, Kristen Nordlund, said via email.

At a CDC advisory board meeting on Wednesday, Johnson & Johnson and Dr. Tom Shimabukuro, an agency security expert, shared data on the young woman in Nevada. Following the meeting, Nevada officials issued a statement saying the meeting was the first time they had heard of a case in their state – they had previously informed the public that no cases had been reported – and they asked “federal partners” why the state had not been informed.

At the Nevada hospital, an interventional radiologist inserted a tube through blood vessels into the young woman’s brain and suctioned out the clots with a device. More clots later formed and he performed the procedure again.

Categories
Politics

Supreme Courtroom erases ruling in opposition to Trump over his Twitter account

President Donald Trump uses a cell phone during a small business reopening panel discussion in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, the United States, on June 18, 2020.

Leah Millis | Reuters

The Supreme Court on Monday overturned a federal appeals court ruling that former President Donald Trump violated the Constitution by blocking his critics on Twitter.

The judges cleared up the decision of the 2nd US Court of Appeals and sent it back to the lower court with instructions to dismiss the case as “in dispute” or no longer active, as Trump is now a private individual. The lawsuit means that the decision of the lower court no longer binds future judges.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd Circle decided unanimously in 2019 that Trump was acting in his official capacity when he used the block function of Twitter. In this way, the court said, Trump effectively banned people from a public forum, which went against the first amendment.

The announcement on Monday was made in an order list and without a written explanation of the court’s arguments. No disagreements were found.

Judge Clarence Thomas unanimously wrote that he agreed to the decision to overturn the 2nd Circuit Opinion as Trump was no longer in office.

Thomas said the petition highlighted “the main legal difficulty surrounding digital platforms – namely that applying old teachings to new digital platforms is seldom easy”.

“For example, respondents indicate that some aspects of Mr. Trump’s account resemble a constitutionally protected public forum,” Thomas wrote. “But it seems pretty strange to say that something is a government forum when a private company has full authority to get rid of it.”

The lawsuit was filed by people who were blocked by Trump on Twitter and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.

It was known as Trump v Knight First Amendment Institute, No. 20-197 until the change in administration, at which point the case automatically became known as Biden v Knight First Amendment Institute.

The Justice Department had originally asked the Supreme Court to overturn the 2nd Circle decision, but asked the judges to dismiss the case as in dispute on January 19, the day before President Joe Biden’s inauguration, because of the change in administration .

The Knight First Amendment Institute agreed that the case was contentious for another reason. The legal group said the case came up for discussion after Twitter kicked Trump off its platform in January following the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

In a statement, Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight Institute, said the case “is a very simple principle that is fundamental to our democracy: officials cannot exclude people from public forums just because they are with them disagree. “

“While we would have liked the Supreme Court to keep the Second Circle decision on the books, we are pleased that the Court of Appeal’s reasoning has already been adopted by other courts, and we are confident that they will how the public shapes them, will continue to shape them. ” Officials use social media, “said Jaffer.

Categories
Business

BorgWarner expects EVs to account for nearly 50% of income by 2030

The CEO of auto parts supplier BorgWarner told CNBC on Friday that the company hopes almost 50% of its sales will be related to electric vehicles within the next decade.

Electric vehicles currently account for less than 3% of the Michigan-based company’s sales.

“We assume that 30% of the vehicle will be battery-electric in 2030. This is already a bullish assumption. We assume that we will generate 45% of our sales,” said CEO Frederic Lissalde in an interview with Jim Cramer about “Mad Money”.

BorgWarner’s drive to grow its EV business is in line with the moves in the automotive industry. A number of electric vehicle startups have hit public markets in recent months, and established titans like General Motors and Ford have announced aggressive efforts to move away from internal combustion engines.

GM plans to exclusively offer electric vehicles by 2035, the company announced earlier this year, and to become carbon neutral by 2040. In February, nearby rival Ford announced plans to nearly double its EV investments by 2025.

BorgWarner manufactures automatic transmissions and turbochargers, among other things. Both Ford and GM are customers, as are Volkswagen and Stellantis, who make Jeep and Dodge vehicles.

BorgWarner is investing heavily in growing its EV business and plans to spend around $ 8 billion on the effort by 2025, Lissalde told Cramer, “We’re funding this pivot ourselves.”

“It’s going in the direction of electrification, we at BorgWarner think that’s really profound. It is going at different speeds and in different regions, but it is profound. Both for light vehicles and commercial vehicles,” he added.

BorgWarner’s shares rose 4.7% on Friday, trading at $ 45.74 apiece. The stock is up more than 18% since the start of the year and around 83% in the past 12 months.

Categories
Business

Pfizer sending fewer Covid vaccine vials to account for additional doses

Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who sits on Pfizer’s board of directors, on Monday defended the company’s move to send fewer vials of its Covid-19 vaccine and count six doses per vial instead of five. This is the best way to ensure the extra dose is used.

When the company started shipping vaccine bottles last month, pharmacists found that they could often extract an extra dose from each vial, which on paper only held five doses. That discovery meant the United States could actually receive more doses of the vaccine than the $ 200 million the Department of Defense bought under its deal with Pfizer.

“The bottom line is that this is a very scarce resource. We have to make sure that every dose is used,” Gottlieb said Monday in CNBC’s “Squawk Box”. “The only way to do this is to market this as a six-dose vial and have the right equipment ready to extract that sixth dose, which is what Pfizer is actually doing.”

The New York Times reported Friday that Pfizer executives in recent weeks have successfully urged Food and Drug Administration officials to revise the wording of the vaccine’s emergency approval to officially include the sixth dose for the federal treaty.

Some pharmacists were confused by the extra doses or didn’t have the correct syringes to extract them and threw them away.

“During this pandemic that is killing many people around the world, it is important that we use all available vaccines and vaccinate as many people as possible. To keep an extra dose in each vial that could be used to vaccinate more people would be one Tragedy, “said company spokeswoman Amy Rose.

Gottlieb said Monday the move will help the US speed up the distribution of vaccine doses, adding that Pfizer can now deliver 120 million doses of the vaccine in the first quarter of 2021, up from 100 million before the labeling change.

However, the move puts pressure on U.S. pharmacists to extract six doses from each vial, which requires some special syringes called low dead space syringes. The US government, which ships kits of syringes and vaccine doses, has signed a contract with syringe manufacturers such as Becton Dickinson, the world’s largest syringe maker, to ensure supplies to local authorities.

However, Becton Dickinson is unable to significantly increase the US supply of syringes, Reuters reported earlier Monday, doubting how many vials the US can extract six doses from.

Gottlieb said the vaccines will only qualify as six-dose vials, which will also give local authorities the correct syringes to extract the final dose.

Gottlieb noted that when Pfizer applied for approval of his emergency vaccine, he knew that six doses could be taken from each vial, but revising the wording of the application would have delayed approval of the vaccine. The company therefore applied for approval with the intention of revising the wording later to reflect the six-dose vials.

He added that it took the U.S. FDA longer than regulators in other countries to make the change. Authorities in the UK, Switzerland and Israel have already revised the wording of their approvals for the Pfizer vaccine to take into account that each vial contains six doses.

Gottlieb, the former head of the FDA, clarified that the change should not be applied retrospectively, which means that all vials previously shipped will be counted as containing five doses.

But “at some point you had to set up the accommodation to properly account for the doses,” said Gottlieb.

Disclosure: Scott Gottlieb is a CNBC employee and a member of the boards of directors of Pfizer, genetic testing startup Tempus, health technology company Aetion Inc., and biotech company Illumina. He is also co-chair of the Healthy Sail Panel of Norwegian Cruise Line Holdings and Royal Caribbean.

Categories
Health

Pfizer Will Ship Fewer Covid-19 Vaccine Vials to Account for ‘Additional’ Doses

However, the federal health authorities that manage the government’s syringe contracts told the FDA that more than 70 percent of the sites are using more efficient syringes and that more syringes can be bought or made according to another person who is aware of the situation.

Still, Pfizer’s attempts to pressurize the FDA worried some health officials, especially since the company itself originally calculated the vials contained five doses. If an extra dose could be extracted, it would mean the vaccine supply could be stretched, protecting more Americans from the virus. On the other hand, too few specialty syringes would mean the government could pay for wasted doses.

In early January, the debate was resolved after a “standard and customary legal review process,” said an FDA spokeswoman. On January 6, in a change to the emergency approval, the FDA officially changed the vaccine datasheet to specify six doses.

“Syringes and / or needles with low dead volume can be used to extract six doses from a single vial,” says the new US bulletin. It also warned, “If standard syringes and needles are used, there may not be enough volume to extract a sixth dose from a single vial.”

In a statement, an FDA spokeswoman said the agency considered several factors in approving Pfizer’s request, including the availability of the specialty syringes, the fact that other health officials had made a similar decision, and that the change would vaccinate Americans faster.

Pfizer and the federal government have agreed to keep track of which locations receive the syringes and other equipment needed to extract the extra dose, and that the company will not bill the US for six doses per vial for locations without these devices. According to a person familiar with the negotiations who was not allowed to speak because the conversations are confidential.

Beginning next week, the number of Pfizer vaccines the federal government will allocate to each state could be based on the assumption that each vial contains six doses, according to a federal official with no legal capacity to discuss the matter. The CDC and the Department of Health and Human Services did not discuss when they could do the shift until Friday afternoon.

Categories
Business

Pfizer Will Ship Fewer Vaccine Vials to Account for ‘Further’ Doses

In December, pharmacists made the happy discovery that they could squeeze an extra vaccine dose out of Pfizer vials that were supposed to contain only five.

Now, it appears, the bill is due. Pfizer plans to count the surprise sixth dose toward its previous commitment of 200 million doses of Covid vaccine by the end of July and therefore will be providing fewer vials than once expected for the United States.

And yet, pharmacists at some vaccination sites say they are still struggling to reliably extract the extra doses, which require the use of a specialty syringe.

“Now there’s more pressure to make sure that you get that sixth dose out,” said Michael Ganio, the senior director for pharmacy practice and quality at the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists.

For weeks, Pfizer executives pushed officials at the Food and Drug Administration to change the wording of the vaccine’s so-called emergency use authorization so that it formally acknowledged that the vials contained six doses, not five.

The distinction was critical: Pfizer’s contract with the federal government requires that it be paid by the dose.

At one point, Pfizer executives lashed out at the top federal vaccine regulator over the government’s reluctance to budge on the request, according to people familiar with the discussions who were not authorized to discuss them.

On Jan. 6, Pfizer got what it wanted. The F.D.A. changed the language in its fact sheet for doctors to confirm that the vials contain a sixth dose. The change mirrors similar labeling updates by the World Health Organization and the F.D.A.’s counterpart in the European Union.

Company officials, including the chief executive, Dr. Albert Bourla, have said that the sixth dose allows Pfizer to stretch its supply of scarce vaccine even further — it was one factor, for example, in the company’s new estimates that it will be able to manufacture two billion doses for the world this year, instead of the 1.3 billion it had originally planned.

A Pfizer spokeswoman, Amy Rose, said the company would “fulfill our supply commitments in line with our existing agreements — which are based on delivery of doses, not vials.”

When Pfizer first began shipping the vaccines in mid-December, it said that each vial contained enough liquid for five doses. But pharmacists in hospitals across the country soon noticed that the vials held enough for a sixth — and sometimes a seventh — dose. The discovery prompted a flurry of excitement and confusion, with some pharmacists throwing out the extra vaccine because they did not have permission to use it.

But they were soon advised by the F.D.A. that they could use those extra doses, which could be extracted with a so-called low dead volume syringe that is designed to cut down on wasted medication and vaccines.

Suddenly, it seemed as if the 100 million doses of vaccine that Pfizer has promised to the United States by the end of March would stretch to as much as 120 million — a welcome development given the scarcity of Covid-19 vaccines and the coronavirus pandemic’s mounting death toll.

But Pfizer insisted that those doses be counted toward its existing contract. It can now sell vials the United States had been expecting to other countries, or charge the United States for them in future deals. That could threaten the wave of good publicity that the company has enjoyed since developing a highly effective vaccine at record speed.

“Pfizer will make a lot of money from these vaccines, and the U.S. government assumed a lot of the upfront risk in this case, so I’m not sure why Pfizer didn’t just continue to fill their supply as planned, even if it meant oversupplying a little,” said Dr. Aaron S. Kesselheim, a professor of medicine at the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School, who studies drug prices.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine?

While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.

When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated?

Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.

If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask?

Yes, but not forever. The two vaccines that will potentially get authorized this month clearly protect people from getting sick with Covid-19. But the clinical trials that delivered these results were not designed to determine whether vaccinated people could still spread the coronavirus without developing symptoms. That remains a possibility. We know that people who are naturally infected by the coronavirus can spread it while they’re not experiencing any cough or other symptoms. Researchers will be intensely studying this question as the vaccines roll out. In the meantime, even vaccinated people will need to think of themselves as possible spreaders.

Will it hurt? What are the side effects?

The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection won’t be any different from ones you’ve gotten before. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. But some of them have felt short-lived discomfort, including aches and flu-like symptoms that typically last a day. It’s possible that people may need to plan to take a day off work or school after the second shot. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign: they are the result of your own immune system encountering the vaccine and mounting a potent response that will provide long-lasting immunity.

Will mRNA vaccines change my genes?

No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

Pfizer’s accounting for the extra dose is already creating controversy in Europe, where some countries — like Belgium — say they have had to cancel vaccination appointments after discovering that Pfizer is sending them fewer vials. “It’s linked to the sixth dose,” Sabine Stordeur, an official overseeing vaccination efforts in Belgium, told the newspaper Le Soir. “It’s still a private company, so one shouldn’t be surprised.”

The U.S. negotiations come at a particularly harrowing time, as the Biden administration is said to be discussing the purchase of a third round of 100 million doses of Pfizer’s vaccine later in the year. The country is racing to vaccinate as many people as possible before more contagious virus variants become widespread, potentially spurring a wave of new hospitalizations and deaths.

Pfizer’s efforts to capitalize on the discovery were for weeks camouflaged in a bureaucratic language dispute. Before Christmas, Pfizer approached F.D.A. officials requesting a formal change to its fact sheet so that it said each vial contained six doses of vaccine instead of five. But regulators instead suggested the phrase “up to six doses,” depending on what kinds of needles and syringes were used to extract the vaccine.

After the F.D.A. signed a new fact sheet with that more cautious language, Pfizer approached F.D.A. officials again, saying it was crucial to say “six doses.” The company suggested altering the language to indicate that low dead volume syringes should be used. At one point, Pfizer executives lashed out at Dr. Peter Marks, the top vaccine regulator at the F.D.A., according to two people who heard about the exchange but were not authorized to discuss it.

An F.D.A. spokeswoman disputed that characterization of the exchange and said it was “constructive.”

Ms. Rose, the Pfizer spokeswoman, said that “in a situation of limited vaccine supply amidst a public health crisis, our intent with this label change is to provide clarity to health care providers, minimize vaccine wastage, and enable the most efficient use of the vaccine.”

In late December, federal health officials sought to figure out whether there were enough of the specialized syringes to justify the shift. Officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said they were uncertain whether the supply was sufficient, according to a person familiar with the conversations.

But federal health officials who manage the government’s contracts for syringes told the F.D.A. that more than 70 percent of the sites were using the more efficient syringes and that more could be easily bought or manufactured, according to another person knowledgeable about the situation.

Still, Pfizer’s attempts to pressure the F.D.A. unsettled some health officials, especially since the company itself originally calculated that the vials contained five doses. If an extra dose could be extracted, that would mean the vaccine supply could be stretched, protecting more Americans from the virus. On the other hand, too few of the specialty syringes would mean the government could end up paying for wasted doses.

By early January, the debate was resolved after a “standard and usual legal review process,” an F.D.A. spokeswoman said. On Jan. 6, in an amendment to the emergency authorization, the F.D.A. formally changed the vaccine’s fact sheet to specify six doses.

“Low dead-volume syringes and/or needles can be used to extract six doses from a single vial,” the new U.S. fact sheet read. It also warned, “If standard syringes and needles are used, there may not be sufficient volume to extract a sixth dose from a single vial.”

Pfizer and the federal government have agreed to track which sites are receiving the syringes and other equipment needed to extract the additional dose, and that the company will not charge the United States for six doses per vial at sites that don’t have that equipment, according to a person familiar with the negotiations who was not authorized to speak because the talks are confidential.

Beginning as soon as next week, the number of Pfizer vaccines that the federal government allocates to each state could be based on the assumption that each vial contains six doses, according to a federal official not authorized to discuss the matter. The C.D.C. and the Department of Health and Human Services were discussing as recently as Friday afternoon when they might make the shift.

Pharmacists around the country are still reporting that they don’t have the right supplies to reliably extract extra doses, said Erin Fox, the senior pharmacy director for drug information and support services at the University of Utah.

She said Pfizer deserved credit for developing the vaccine, but “it isn’t fair to people that can’t access the right syringe and needle combination to be able to get that sixth dose out.”

The contracts for low dead volume syringes are managed by the Department of Health and Human Services’ Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Agency. A spokeswoman for the agency said the federal government had procured enough of the syringes for the Pfizer vaccine currently available and was working with the company to “track current inventory and future deliveries of these specific syringes for Pfizer and continually comparing them to projected delivery of doses from Pfizer.”

Dr. Fox said that McKesson, the distribution company that has contracted with the federal government to deliver vaccination supplies, is still sending kits that contain only enough supplies for five doses per vial.

A McKesson spokesman said the company began sending out kits that account for the sixth dose this week.

Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, said on Thursday that the Biden administration might use the Defense Production Act to accelerate production of the specialized syringes in order to increase supply, suggesting that the federal government is uncertain whether it will have enough in the future.

Categories
World News

Trump tweets from POTUS deal with account taken down nearly instantly

US President Donald Trump makes a fist during a rally to contest the certification of the results of the 2020 US presidential election by the US Congress in Washington, USA, on January 6, 2021.

Jim Bourg | Reuters

President Donald Trump continued to tweet on the state-owned @POTUS account on Friday night, despite the fact that his @ realDonaldTrump account was permanently banned by Twitter earlier in the day.

“As I’ve said for a long time, Twitter has continued to ban freedom of speech, and tonight Twitter staff coordinated with the Democrats and the radical left to remove my account from their platform and silence me,” Trump wrote in a series of tweets that are no longer visible on the social media service.

The tweets were removed from service almost immediately. It’s unclear what steps Twitter took to manage the @ POTUS account.

Earlier in the day, the company announced that it would permanently suspend Trump’s personal account “because of the risk of further inciting violence”.

Twitter specifically pointed out that Trump’s tweets earlier in the day could be interpreted as supportive rioters. The company also noted that plans for future armed protests inside and outside the social media service had increased.

In his @POTUS tweets, Trump reiterated his call to repeal Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, a 1996 law that protects tech companies from being held liable for what users post on their platforms. The sentiment was endorsed by Republican Senator Lindsey Graham.

“I’m more determined than ever to remove Big Tech (Twitter) protection from Section 230 so they can be safe from lawsuits,” Graham tweeted.

Trump also said his administration was “negotiating with various other locations and will soon get a big announcement”. He added that his team is reviewing “the possibilities of building their own platform in the near future”.

“We are not being silenced! Twitter is not about FREE SPEECH,” wrote Trump in the now removed tweets.

Categories
Business

Trump’s Twitter Account Completely Suspended

OAKLAND, Calif. – Twitter announced on Friday that it had permanently suspended President Trump “because of the risk of further incitement to violence”, effectively cutting him off from his favorite megaphone to reach the public and a range of actions to end mainstream sites in order to limit its online reach.

Twitter said in a blog post that Mr. Trump’s personal @ realDonaldTrump account, which has more than 88 million followers, would be banned immediately. The company said two tweets Mr Trump posted on Friday – one calling his supporters “patriots” and another saying he would not go to the President’s inauguration on Jan. 20 – violated its rules against the glorification of violence.

The tweets “most likely encouraged and inspired people to repeat the criminal acts that took place in the US Capitol on January 6, 2021,” said Twitter, referring to the storming of the Capitol by a bunch of Trump loyalists.

Within minutes, Mr. Trump’s Twitter account was no longer accessible. His contributions were replaced by a label: “Account blocked.”

Mr Trump attempted to evade the ban late Friday by using the @POTUS Twitter account owned by the incumbent US president and other accounts to attack the company. But almost all of his messages were removed from Twitter almost immediately. The company prohibits users from avoiding being banned with secondary accounts.

The moves were a staunch rejection of Mr. Trump on Twitter, who had used the platform to build his base and spread his messages, which were often filled with falsehoods and threats. Mr Trump regularly tweeted dozens of times a day and sent a flurry of messages early morning or late evening. In his posts, he gave his live reactions to television news broadcasts, increased supporters, and attacked his perceived enemies.

“Twitter’s permanent suspension of Trump’s Twitter account is long overdue,” said Shannon McGregor, senior researcher at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. “This is the most important de-platform for Trump. The inability to tweet prevents his direct access to the press – and thus also to the public. “

In a statement late Friday, Mr Trump said Twitter tried to silence him. He said he was negotiating with other websites and promising a “big announcement soon” adding that he wanted to build “our own platform”.

“Twitter is not about FREE SPEECH,” Trump said. “It’s about promoting a radical left platform where some of the most evil people in the world can speak freely.”

The day before, Facebook had banned Mr. Trump for the remainder of his tenure, and other digital platforms – including Snapchat, YouTube, Twitch, and Reddit – recently restricted Mr. Trump to their services as well.

The actions were a strong example of the power of social media companies and how they could act almost unilaterally if they wanted to. Twitter, Facebook and other platforms had for years positioned themselves as defenders of free speech, saying that the posts of world leaders like Mr. Trump should be allowed because they were current. The companies had refused to touch his account even after being attacked for allowing misinformation and falsehoods.

Twitter decided to permanently suspend Mr Trump due to pressures from lawmakers, his own staff and many others, including Michelle Obama. Other world leaders and leaders have also posted brand tweets asking whether Twitter has come down a slippery slope and needed to close other accounts.

On Friday, the company also permanently suspended the accounts of several prominent Trump supporters who used the platform to spread conspiracy theories, including attorney Sidney Powell and former National Security Advisor to President Trump Michael T. Flynn. Rush Limbaugh, the Conservative talk show host, also appeared to have deactivated his account.

Donald Trump Jr., Mr. Trump’s son, described Twitter’s move against his father as “absolute madness” and said the tech companies were overwhelmed. “We live Orwell’s 1984,” he tweeted.

“Now is the time for Congress to repeal Section 230 and put Big Tech on the same legal footing as any other company in America,” said Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina on Friday.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Jan. 7, 2021, 12:58 p.m. ET

Mr Trump had repeatedly said to allies who had raised the possibility of social media companies banning him, “They will never ban me.”

There was an extensive process in place in the White House for creating official tweets. But at night and early in the morning, Mr. Trump composed his own tweets on his iPhone, often to the chagrin of advisers and Republican lawmakers who would spend hours or days studying the aftermath.

“I wouldn’t be here without the tweets,” Trump told the Financial Times in April 2017.

At a meeting at the White House last year, Brad Parscale, then Trump’s campaign manager, suggested that the president switch to Parler, an alternative social media site that has become popular with right-wing users. But Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, later turned down the idea, sharing Mr Trump’s trust that Twitter would not act, and it never happened, such a person who was briefed on what happened.

While the White House still has official Twitter accounts like @POTUS and @WhiteHouse until it opens, Twitter has announced that it will make it easier to transfer these accounts to the incoming Biden administration. Prior to Wednesday’s mob attack, Twitter’s executive director Jack Dorsey was involved in discussions about the transfer of these accounts, said a person familiar with the discussions.

The backlash against Mr. Trump online began Wednesday after his President-challenged loyalists breached the Capitol building. As a result, Twitter temporarily blocked Mr. Trump’s account, followed by Facebook. At the time, Twitter said the risk of having his comment live on its website had become too high.

The company said Mr Trump could return to his platform if he deleted multiple tweets containing falsehoods about the elections or calls for violence in violation of its guidelines. One of the tweets was a video Mr. Trump posted after police pushed the mob back where he told his followers, “We love you. You are something special. ”

After Mr Trump cut those posts, he was put back on the site Thursday. Late Thursday he issued a conciliatory message saying he was outraged by the violence and would allow a peaceful change of power.

But Mr. Trump tweeted on Friday that his supporters were “American patriots” with a “HUGE VOICE well into the future”. He also said he would not attend the inauguration on January 20.

Twitter said the news appeared to condone Wednesday’s violence and was likely to fuel further violence. It added that the one about the inauguration offered the date as a target.

“Plans for future armed protests have already spread on and off Twitter, including a planned secondary attack on the US Capitol and the state capitol building on January 17, 2021,” Twitter said.

Within Twitter, employees and executives have discussed how to treat Mr. Trump’s account. Mr Dorsey was vacationing on an island in French Polynesia this week but has been invited to meetings, said three people with knowledge of his location. On Thursday, he sent an email to employees saying it was important for Twitter to adhere to its policies, including the policy that a user can return after being temporarily banned, according to someone who received the email Has.

Hundreds of employees soon signed a petition urging the company to remove Mr Trump’s account immediately, said three people familiar with the petition. The petition was previously reported by the Washington Post.

On Friday, Twitter held a meeting with employees, two people with knowledge of the event said. During the meeting, workers urged executives why they hadn’t permanently banned Mr. Trump from the platform.

Mr Dorsey and other executives, like Vijaya Gadde, director of law and security at Twitter, said the company wants to be in line with its policies. These say that users can tweet again after deleting the messages that violate the rules.

But Mr Dorsey also said he “drew a line” in the sand that the president could not cross for fear of losing his account privileges, people with knowledge of the event said. Mr Dorsey said Twitter would issue a suspension if Mr Trump crossed that line.

Emerson Brooking, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, said the closure of Mr. Trump’s Twitter account was in some ways too late, given that the president had already been promoting so many conspiracy theories on the platform in recent years.

“Removing Trump from Twitter will not fix our policies, nor will it bring millions of Americans back to reality,” Brooking said. “But it makes it a lot harder for disinformation to go mainstream. And it makes it harder for Trump to reach his supporters. “

Aside from muting Mr. Trump’s largest megaphone, Twitter’s decision could be a headache for the Trump administration when it comes to complying with the Presidential Records Act of 1978, which requires the retention of materials and communications from the President.

Maggie Haberman, Katie Rosman and Maggie Astor contributed to the coverage.