Category: Politics

Categories
Politics

Dominion sues MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell over pro-Trump election conspiracies

Dominion sues MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell over pro-Trump election conspiracies

Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow, waits outside the west wing of the White House before entering Washington, DC on January 15, 2021.

Drew Angerer | Getty Images

Dominion Voting Systems sued Mike Lindell, CEO of MyPillow, Monday, accusing former President Donald Trump’s staunch ally of making false conspiracies about the 2020 election “because the lie is selling pillows”.

The $ 1.3 billion defamation lawsuit states that Lindell knew his repeated claims that the election had been “stolen” were not backed by evidence, but were held to help Trump’s supporters of the MyPillow purchase -To stimulate products.

The 115-page complaint, filed in federal court in Washington, DC, cites numerous statements Lindell made in television interviews and social media posts, as well as in a two-hour documentary that aired on conservative media in February.

“MyPillow’s defamatory marketing campaign – featuring promo codes like” FightforTrump “,” 45 “,” Proof “and” QAnon “- has increased MyPillow sales by 30-40% and has continued to mislead people to lie their choices in pillow purchases divert, “says Dominion’s lawsuit.

In a phone interview with CNBC, Lindell said, “I’m very happy that you finally filed the lawsuit.”

“My message to Dominion is that you finally did it because it’s going to be in the spotlight again,” said Lindell.

Lindell also denied Dominion’s claims that his company benefited from his efforts.

“They also say that I benefited from it, or that I used this for MyPillow to advertise and that’s not true. I lost 22 retailers,” Lindell said. “The culture for MyPillow has been canceled.”

The lawsuit against Lindell is just the latest effort by Dominion to seek redress for the “enormous damage” caused by the “viral disinformation campaign” against the electoral society whose systems were deployed in some areas of the US during the presidential election.

Last month, Dominion sued Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, accusing him of spreading similar conspiracies about the company to “get rich financially”.

Giuliani had called the lawsuit, which also claimed more than $ 1.3 billion in punitive and compensatory damages, as “intimidating the hateful left wing to obliterate and censor the exercise of freedom of speech and the ability of lawyers.” To vigorously defend customers. “

Smartmatic, another optional equipment company targeted after President Joe Biden’s victory in a series of conspiracies, filed its own billions of dollars in defamation lawsuit against the owner of Fox News in early February.

This is the latest news. Please try again.

Categories
Politics

Robust Sanctions, Then a Mysterious Final-Minute Turnabout

Tough Sanctions, Then a Mysterious Last-Minute Turnabout

WASHINGTON — In early December, an Israeli billionaire named Dan Gertler made an unusual request to the Treasury Department.

A mining magnate who had been accused for years of corruption in deals he struck with leaders of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Mr. Gertler had been slapped with stiff sanctions by the Trump administration in 2017, effectively cutting off his access to the international banking system and freezing money held in U.S. banks.

He had unsuccessfully tried since then to get the sanctions rolled back by hiring high-powered lobbyists and lawyers, including Alan Dershowitz, who had represented President Donald J. Trump in his first impeachment trial, and the former F.B.I. director Louis Freeh.

But with time running out on the Trump administration and the incoming Biden administration unlikely to give his pleas much of a hearing, Mr. Gertler put one last offer on the table: He would agree to have outside monitors track his business and submit regular reports on his financial transactions if the United States would lift the sanctions.

The response came in mid-January, with only days left in Mr. Trump’s term: Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin granted Mr. Gertler much of what he wanted, signing off, without any public announcement, on a one-year arrangement that gave him access to money frozen in U.S. banks and allowed him once again to do business with financial institutions worldwide.

The decision stunned and angered American diplomats in Washington and Africa and government officials and human rights activists in the Democratic Republic of Congo, where Mr. Gertler had been accused years earlier by the United Nations and other groups of working with the then-ruling family on deals that looted the nation’s mineral wealth and propped up a corrupt regime.

And it has left the Biden administration scrambling to determine how Mr. Gertler managed to pull it off — and whether it can be reversed.

The episode has echoes of Mr. Trump’s last-minute grants of clemency to political and personal allies and people with connections to him, including the involvement of Mr. Dershowitz. It also highlighted Mr. Gertler’s use of high-powered connections in Israel, including people with ties to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and an effort to win support from the U.S. ambassador to Israel.

But the outcome was also distinguished by the secrecy of the process, which cut out the American diplomats most directly responsible for dealing with Congo and fighting corruption in Africa and appeared to have been handled largely at the level of Mr. Mnuchin and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo. The decision became public only after Mr. Trump had left office.

The abrupt reversal of policy toward Mr. Gertler was extraordinary in a number of ways, an investigation by The New York Times found.

Among the findings:

  • The rapid decision to grant Mr. Gertler much of what he wanted defied Treasury Department norms, according to three former agency lawyers, effectively rolling back sanctions with no public documentation justifying the move and without broadly consulting officials at the State Department or the National Security Council. Only last year, some American diplomats and members of Congress in both parties were seeking to expand the sanctions on Mr. Gertler.

  • Mr. Gertler tested the limits of federal law by hiring lawyers who also worked as lobbyists in Washington to push his case, including Mr. Dershowitz, who was instrumental in winning clemency from Mr. Trump for an array of clients, and Mr. Freeh. Treasury rules generally prohibit people under sanctions from spending money on lobbyists in the United States.

  • The Treasury Department’s decision to grant Mr. Gertler a special license was based in part on an assertion that there was a “national security interest” for the United States in Mr. Gertler’s business dealings in Africa, lawyers involved in the effort and Israeli officials said. But some State Department officials were skeptical that his security value could outweigh the human, economic and moral damage contained in the allegations against him. It is also unclear how the balance could have shifted since sanctions were imposed in 2017.

  • Pressure also came from Israel, where Mr. Gertler is represented by prominent lawyers including Boaz Ben Zur, whose client list also includes Mr. Netanyahu. David M. Friedman, then the U.S. ambassador there, was targeted in the push, and then notified Mr. Mnuchin and Mr. Pompeo that he supported the sanctions relief Mr. Gertler wanted, assuming the Treasury Department could work it out.

“I am astounded by this,” said John E. Smith, who served as the director of the Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control at the time the sanctions were imposed on Mr. Gertler. “It appears to be an abuse of the process.”

Mr. Mnuchin and Mr. Pompeo, who was also said to be supportive of the decision, both declined to comment.

Mr. Gertler, in a statement, said the decision was not a result of any special influence campaign in Israel or the United States, but instead his promise to be more transparent about his business operations worldwide.

“We will be adopting and implementing the most stringent anti-bribery and anti-corruption policies and measures across all our global practices,” Mr. Gertler said.

But diplomats and human rights activists said they could see no justification for giving a break to Mr. Gertler, who was described by the Treasury Department in 2018 as “engaged in the looting of natural resources and the humanitarian consequences” that followed in poor, strife-torn Congo.

Senior State Department officials in the Trump administration — including Michael Hammer, the U.S. ambassador to Congo; J. Peter Pham, a special envoy; and Tibor P. Nagy, the assistant secretary of state for African affairs — were not informed ahead of time of the move to grant Mr. Gertler the license, contrary to normal practice.

“Here you have one of the most poverty-stricken nations, with a population that has suffered incredibly over the last several decades, and we have worked to turn that around, so why do this?” said Mr. Pham, who until Jan. 20 served as a senior State Department adviser on Africa.

Mr. Gertler arrived in Congo in 1997 as a 23-year-old diamond dealer, determined to challenge the global giant in supplying raw diamonds, the South African-based De Beers.

One of his first big breaks came about three years later, when Laurent Kabila, then the president of Congo, needed weapons to wage a war that would last for more than a decade.

Offering monopolies to foreigners looking to tap into Congo’s rich mineral resources was a way for Mr. Kabila to raise cash needed to fight the war. Among them was a deal to export diamonds with Mr. Gertler, who was considered an appealing intermediary because of his ties to generals in the Israeli Army that could help Congo procure weapons, according to two reports issued by the United Nations in 2001. (Mr. Gertler disputed the findings.)

But the U.N. concluded that Mr. Kabila used money gained selling access to the nation’s mineral wealth — including his deal with Mr. Gertler — to expand the Congolese military forces, a move that helped popularize the terms “conflict diamonds” and “blood diamonds.”

“Conflict diamonds are exchanged for money, weapons and military training,” a U.N. report describing Mr. Gertler’s work said.

Mr. Gertler was also indirectly accused, in a Justice Department court filing in 2016, of paying more than $100 million in bribes to government officials in Congo on behalf of a company named Och-Ziff “to obtain special access to and preferential prices for opportunities in the government-controlled mining sector.”

A spokesman for Mr. Gertler, Aron Shaviv, said Mr. Gertler was never interviewed or charged in the case and he denied any wrongdoing. Instead, Mr. Shaviv said, Mr. Gertler’s companies have directly invested more than $1.5 billion in Congo, becoming one of the nation’s largest employers and taxpayers, starting when no other foreigners were willing to take the risk of doing business in the middle of a war.

“He did buy cheap and he may sell at a much, much higher price because he made the investment when no one else did, no one else would dare go to Congo,” said Mr. Shaviv, a political consultant who served as Mr. Netanyahu’s campaign manager in 2015.

Mr. Gertler first came onto the radar of White House officials in 2002, when Joseph Kabila, who took over the nation after his father was assassinated the prior year, sent a letter to President George W. Bush, looking for help to end the war.

“Please accept my appointed emissary, Mr. Dan Gertler, a respected and well-known international businessman, to speak on my behalf for the needs of the Democratic Republic of Congo,” Mr. Kabila wrote in the April 2002 letter to Mr. Bush, a copy of which was obtained by The New York Times.

“He played a very pivotal role in not only advising Kabila, but also sort of speaking with authority and definitely carrying the United States’ message,” Jendayi E. Frazer, who then served as an adviser to Mr. Bush for African affairs, said in an interview.

Mr. Gertler’s work helped lead to a peace deal in 2003. And it also cemented his relationship with Joseph Kabila. The Congolese government began to grant new deals to Mr. Gertler and his growing empire of companies, which expanded from diamonds into copper, cobalt, oil, gas and gold.

The New Washington

Updated 

Feb. 19, 2021, 7:17 p.m. ET

In just five deals negotiated between 2010 and 2012 to sell copper and cobalt through offshore companies linked to the Fleurette Group, which is controlled by Mr. Gertler and his family, the citizens of Congo lost an estimated $1.36 billion because the nation’s resources were being sold at one-sixth of their value, according to a report prepared in 2013 by Kofi Annan, the former U.N. secretary general, and other prominent African officials.

The forgone revenues to Congo from the deals “were equivalent to more than double the combined annual budget for health and education,” the report concluded.

In Congo, over 70 percent of the population lives in extreme poverty, with an income of less than $1.90 a day. But the profits generated for Mr. Gertler were extraordinary, averaging 512 percent, according to the study, turning him into one of the 29 youngest billionaires in the world, according to Forbes.

It was not just Mr. Gertler who was reported to be becoming tremendously wealthy through these deals.

The corruption and exploitation inherent in these types of deals were just the sort that a new appointee at the Treasury Department named Sigal P. Mandelker was determined to confront when she was confirmed as the top official in charge of sanctions enforcement in 2017.

“Our objective is to change behavior, inspire democracy and freedom, and disrupt the ability of kleptocrats, human rights abusers and others from stealing the wealth of their country,” Ms. Mandelker said in a 2019 speech.

Ms. Mandelker drew bipartisan praise for her effort to take advantage of new authority Congress granted to the Treasury in 2016. The Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act, as the law is known, is named after a Russian tax lawyer, Sergei Magnitsky, who died in a Moscow prison in 2009 after he exposed corruption by Russian officials.

The new law allowed the Treasury to freeze the assets of individuals or businesses operating anywhere in the world that were engaged in “gross violations of internationally recognized human rights.”

Working with the State and Justice Departments, Ms. Mandelker’s team included Mr. Gertler in the first round of individuals penalized in December 2017, citing his record of “opaque and corrupt” mining and oil deals in Congo. A second round of sanctions in 2018 targeted more companies affiliated with Mr. Gertler.

The sanctions on Mr. Gertler severely constrained his ability to do business around the world by cutting off his access to the United States banking system and limiting his access even to non-U.S. financial institutions concerned about running afoul of the American law.

But less than a year after the sanctions were imposed, Mr. Gertler began his campaign to roll them back.

The push started with a seemingly innocuous request: Grant Mr. Gertler permission to use some of his money to make charitable donations to hospitals, libraries and schools in Congo.

But even that plan drew concern from some State Department officials, who were worried that the donations would allow Mr. Gertler to bolster his standing in Congo and help supporters of Mr. Kabila, by then out of office, challenge efforts by the new, democratically elected president, Félix Tshisekedi, to assert control.

By last year, Mr. Gertler was also battling to rebut a report by two human rights groups citing what they said was evidence that he was evading the sanctions by using a network of shell companies, frontmen and proxy bank accounts to move millions of dollars in and out of Congo and even to acquire new mining rights there.

Mr. Gertler sued both the human rights groups and the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, which published reports detailing the allegations. Lawyers working for Mr. Gertler and a bank in Congo claimed the reports were based on documents that were stolen and then tampered with. The paper and the human rights groups have defended the accuracy of their reporting.

Instead of supporting Mr. Gertler’s bid for permission to make charitable donations, State Department officials responsible for Africa pressed the Treasury Department to expand the sanctions.

But by the end of 2019, key players at the Treasury, including Ms. Mandelker, had started to leave the Trump administration, and State Department officials like Mr. Pham said they found it more difficult to get new Magnitsky sanctions imposed.

The officials turned to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for help in keeping up the pressure on Mr. Gertler. In August, members of the committee sent the Treasury Department a bipartisan letter that did not mention him by name but carried a clear message.

To help build democracy and fight corruption in Congo, the letter said, the United States “should designate additional officials and companies responsible for or complicit in high-level corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, for targeted financial and travel sanctions.”

But Mr. Gertler’s team, including Mr. Dershowitz and Mr. Freeh, had a different message. They had solicited a letter from Ms. Frazer attesting to Mr. Gertler’s role in the peace negotiations nearly two decades earlier and distributed it to Trump administration officials. As far back as 2019, they set up meetings with State Department officials, making the case that his activities had helped the interests of the United States.

“His first effort was a lobbying effort,” Mr. Shaviv said of Mr. Gertler’s campaign.

But Treasury rules state that “professional services such as lobbying, public relations, government affairs, consulting and business development are not legal services, and are generally not covered” by an exemption that allows people under sanctions to hire lawyers.

Mr. Dershowitz said the meetings were permitted because he did not lobby the White House or others on this matter.

“My role was purely limited to the legal issues,” Mr. Dershowitz said.

But with time running out on Mr. Trump’s tenure and the sanctions still not lifted, Mr. Gertler decided to make a strategy shift. While not admitting any past wrongdoing, Mr. Gertler’s lawyers told the Treasury Department in early December that he was prepared to take any reasonable steps to assure the United States that he would abide by the law, including hiring outside monitors and submitting detailed periodic reports on financial transactions.

“Our entire approach was to assure them that going forward, there would be no problem,” Mr. Shaviv said.

At the same time, assertions were being made that Mr. Gertler had been of value to U.S. intelligence agencies.

“It’s absolutely the case that the national security interests of both Israel and the United States were implicated in this,” Mr. Dershowitz said, although he and others declined to provide any specifics. Mr. Shaviv declined to discuss whether Mr. Gertler had undertaken any such activities, but said that if they did take place, they would be described as “services rendered to the United States of America.”

Whatever Mr. Gertler did that benefited the United States was sensitive enough that Israeli officials said they were aware of it but declined to comment on its nature. Two Israeli officials told The Times that the United States had informed Israel that in line with a decision by Mr. Mnuchin and Mr. Pompeo, the terms of the sanctions imposed on Mr. Gertler would be eased “out of reasons of American national security.”

But several former State and Treasury Department officials said that while as a foreigner operating in Congo Mr. Gertler might have had information the United States considered valuable, keeping him on the sanctions list also had a value to Washington by helping to promote the anti-corruption effort.

“The only value to national security that Gertler has comes from him being placed in the box that he was put into with the sanctions,” Mr. Pham said.

In any case, the decision to grant him the one-year license was unusual in a number of respects, they said.

The Treasury Department traditionally agrees to revoke sanctions only after individuals have proved they have already changed their behavior, not simply agreed to make such changes in the future, said Mr. Smith, the former head of the sanctions unit, who is now a national security lawyer at the law firm Morrison and Foerster. Mr. Gertler had not previously provided the United States such evidence.

Furthermore, if Mr. Gertler’s assets in U.S. banks were going to be unfrozen and his corporate entitles allowed to once again do business with United States financial institutions, as the license allowed, that kind of deal would almost certainly need to be made public, not issued in secret as this one was. This kind of review also typically takes months of effort, not the six weeks that it took in this case.

“This is a unique, one-of-a-kind response that you don’t see with the United States government,” Mr. Smith said of the so-called specific license that Mr. Gertler received. “It is the most shocking license I have ever seen in a few decades of working on economic sanctions.”

When word of the decision to grant Mr. Gertler the one-year license eventually trickled out after Mr. Trump left office, it set off a firestorm of criticism from officials who said it would undercut efforts by the United States to fight corruption.

Mr. Hammer, the U.S. ambassador to Congo, was at first ​so ​confused at the news, according to one State Department official briefed on the matter, ​​​that he​ called officials in Washington to figure out if ​a ​mistake had been made.

“This has made my job much tougher​​,” an angry Mr. Hammer told colleagues.​​​

House and Senate Democrats fired off letters to the Treasury and State Departments. A coalition of 30 Congolese and international human rights groups assailed the move, with one of the letters calling the move a “terrible blow to the heart of one of the most lauded and effective anti-corruption programs of the last decade.”

The Biden administration is now investigating why the license was issued, and if it could be revoked, although Mr. Gertler’s team said that it would have no justification to take such a step.

Mr. Gertler, meanwhile, has begun a campaign to rehabilitate his image in Congo, releasing promotional videos detailing his work to support local hospitals and schools there and calling the citizens of Congo “brothers and sisters.” He also started a plan to allow residents of Congo to invest in one of his new mining projects.

Activists in Congo were not impressed.

“How can someone who has done so much harm to Congo for 20 years suddenly say he’s an angel?” said Jimmy Kande, a leader in the nonprofit group Congo Is Not for Sale. “If Congolese authorities would finally look at Gertler’s past, he shouldn’t have much of a future in Congo.”

Kenneth P. Vogel, Lara Jakes and Julian E. Barnes contributed reporting.

Categories
Politics

Oath Keepers boss quoted Trump earlier than Capitol riot

Oath Keepers boss quoted Trump before Capitol riot

Jessica Marie Watkins (2nd from L) and Donovan Ray Crowl (center), both from Ohio, march with the Oath Keepers militia group among the supporters of US President Donald Trump on January 6, 2021 in Washington down the eastern front steps of the US Capitol Both have since been charged by federal authorities for their roles in the siege of the U.S. Capitol.

Jim Bourg | Reuters

The self-described leader of the Florida chapter of the far-right group, the Oath Keepers, urged supporters to travel with him to Washington on January 6 because “Trump said it was going to be wild !!!!!!” That day revealed court documents that were released on Friday.

“He wants us to do it WILD, he says,” wrote Kelly Meggs, chief of the oath guard, in a Facebook message.

This news is listed in a new indictment indicting him and five other Oath Guards for crimes related to the Jan 6th Capitol riot by thousands of Trump supporters.

“He called us all to the Capitol and wants us to go wild !!! Sir Yes Sir !!!”, Meggs wrote in the Capitol, according to the indictment in the US District Court in Washington in which the defendants are accused. Complex to have penetrated.

The news referred to a tweet from Trump in late December when he was frantically seeking law and propaganda to overturn Joe Biden’s election as president.

January 6th was the day for a joint congressional session chaired by then Vice President Mike Pence to confirm Biden’s victory.

“Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 election,” tweeted Trump, referring to his unfounded claims that widespread electoral fraud got him out of an electoral college victory.

“Big protest in DC on January 6. Be there, be wild,” wrote Trump.

Meggs wrote in his Facebook message: “Gentlemen, we’re going to DC, pack your shit !!”

“”[W]We’ll have at least 50-100 OK there, “added Meggs.

The replacing indictment alleges that Kelly and several other defendants – Connie Meggs, Graydon Young, Laura Steele and Sandra Ruth Parker – wore paramilitary gear and sat with two other previously indicted defendants, Jessica Watkins and Donovan Crowl, “in a military style “Teamed up” formation that marched up the middle steps on the east side of the US Capitol, broke through the top door, and then stormed the building, “the US Department of Justice said in a January 6 press release.

Members of the Oath Keepers provide security to Roger Stone at a rally the night before groups attacked the U.S. Capitol in Washington, USA, on January 5, 2021.

Jim Urquhart | Reuters

Trump held a large rally outside the White House on Jan. 6, where he and his allies, including attorney Rudy Giuliani, encouraged supporters to help them fight Biden’s confirmation of victory.

When planning the trip to Washington, according to the indictment, Meggs made statements that his group would not need to be armed for the attack on the Capitol, as he expected there would be a “heavy QRF 10 min out”.

Prosecutors said “QRF” refers to a “rapid response force,” a term used by law enforcement and the military to refer to an armed unit that is able to respond quickly to developing situations respond, typically to aid allied units in need of such assistance. “

The indictment states that around the same time as Meggs’ embassy, ​​Young arranged for him and others to be trained by a company in Florida that provides firearms and combat training.

Young, 54, of Englewood, Florida, was arrested Monday in Tampa, Florida, while Meggs, 52, and Connie Meggs, 59, both from Dunnellon, Florida, were arrested in Ocala, Florida on Wednesday.

The other newly indicted defendants were arrested elsewhere. Steele, 52, of Thomasville, North Carolina, was arrested Wednesday in Greensboro, North Carolina, while Sandra Ruth Parker, 62, and Bennie Alvin Parker, 70, both of Morrow, Ohio, were arrested Thursday.

All six defendants are charged with conspiring to obstruct formal proceedings in Congress, rob federal government property and prevent illegal entry.

Bennie Parker and another previously indicted defendant, Thomas Caldwell, are also charged with obstructing the investigation by allegedly tampering with documents or procedures by failing to send and delete content on Facebook.

Trump was indicted by the House of Representatives in January, accused of instigating the uprising on his false fraud allegations, and calls on his supporters to fight. Five people died in the riot, including a Capitol policeman.

But Trump, who stepped down from office on Jan. 20, was acquitted by the Senate last week on his impeachment trial.

Categories
Politics

How Democrats Are Already Maneuvering to Form Biden’s First Supreme Courtroom Decide

How Democrats Are Already Maneuvering to Shape Biden’s First Supreme Court Pick

WASHINGTON – Nachdem er sich Anfang dieses Monats im Oval Office mit Präsident Biden, Vizepräsident Kamala Harris und seinen hochrangigen Hausdemokraten getroffen hatte, machte sich der Vertreter James E. Clyburn aus South Carolina auf den Weg zu Frau Harris ‘Büro im Westflügel, um privat eine zu erheben Thema, das während ihrer Gruppendiskussion nicht zur Sprache kam: der Oberste Gerichtshof.

Herr Clyburn, der ranghöchste Afroamerikaner im Kongress, wollte Frau Harris den Namen einer potenziellen zukünftigen Justiz anbieten, so ein Demokrat, der über ihr Gespräch informiert wurde. Die Richterin des Bezirksgerichts, J. Michelle Childs, würde die Zusage von Herrn Biden erfüllen, die erste schwarze Frau zum Obersten Gerichtshof zu ernennen – und, wie Herr Clyburn bemerkte, stammte sie zufällig auch aus South Carolina, einem Staat mit politischer Bedeutung für den Präsidenten.

Im Moment ist möglicherweise keine Stelle am Obersten Gerichtshof frei, aber Herr Clyburn und andere Gesetzgeber manövrieren bereits, um Kandidaten zu fördern und einen neuen Ansatz für eine Nominierung zu finden, der bereits in diesem Sommer kommen könnte, wenn einige Demokraten auf Gerechtigkeit Stephen Breyer hoffen Der 82-jährige wird in den Ruhestand gehen. Da die Demokraten die engste Mehrheit im Senat haben und Ruth Bader Ginsburgs Tod immer noch schmerzlich frisch im Kopf ist, wollen diese Parteiführer die Ernennung von Herrn Biden gestalten, einschließlich der Abkehr der Partei von den üblichen Lebensläufen der Ivy League.

Das frühe Jockeying zeigt, wie eifrig demokratische Beamte ihre Spuren in den Bemühungen von Herrn Biden hinterlassen wollen, historisch unterrepräsentierte Kandidaten für eine wegweisende Nominierung des Obersten Gerichtshofs zu gewinnen. Aber es wirft auch einen Blick auf unangenehme Fragen der Klasse und des Glaubwürdigkeitsgefühls in der Demokratischen Partei, die seit den Tagen der Obama-Regierung knapp unter der Oberfläche lagen.

Einige Demokraten wie Mr. Clyburn, die nervös beobachtet haben, wie Republikaner versuchten, sich als Arbeiterpartei neu zu verpacken, glauben, dass Mr. Biden eine Botschaft über seine Entschlossenheit senden könnte, Demokraten durch die Wahl eines Kandidaten wie ihren Arbeiterwurzeln treu zu bleiben Frau Childs, die öffentliche Universitäten besuchte.

“Eines der Dinge, auf die wir sehr, sehr vorsichtig sein müssen, wenn Demokraten mit diesem elitären Pinsel gemalt werden”, sagte Clyburn und fügte hinzu: “Wenn Menschen mit Vielfalt sprechen, schauen sie immer auf Rasse und ethnische Zugehörigkeit – ich schaue darüber hinaus das zur Vielfalt der Erfahrungen. “

Der Vertreter GK Butterfield aus North Carolina, wie Herr Clyburn, ein Veteranenmitglied des Congressional Black Caucus, machte im vergangenen Monat in einer E-Mail an die Anwältin des Weißen Hauses, Dana Remus, einen ähnlichen Punkt, in der er die bevorzugten Kriterien des Caucus für die Ernennung von Bundesgerichten auflistete. Ganz oben auf der Liste stand laut Butterfield: „Der Richter sollte über vielfältige Erfahrungen in verschiedenen Situationen und in verschiedenen Bereichen verfügen, einschließlich Erfahrungen außerhalb des Gesetzes.“

Mr. Bidens Versprechen, die erste schwarze Frau vor Gericht zu stellen, war eine ungewöhnliche Art von Wahlversprechen: Mr. Clyburn stupste ihn an, dies bei einer Debatte in Charleston vor South Carolinas zentraler Vorwahl im letzten Jahr zu tun. Es war ein Gelübde, dem sich sogar einige Adjutanten des Präsidenten widersetzten, weil sie befürchteten, es könnte nach Pandering aussehen.

Herr Biden hat in der Öffentlichkeit wenig gesagt, seit er über seine Präferenzen für das Gericht gewählt wurde, aber als ehemaliger Vorsitzender des Justizausschusses des Senats hat er eine gespaltene Persönlichkeit, wenn es um Personalpolitik geht. Obwohl er gerne seine Wurzeln in Scranton, Pennsylvania, seine Wurzeln, sein staatliches Schuldiplom und seinen Spitznamen „Middle-Class Joe“ hervorhebt, hat er sich lange Zeit mit Adjutanten und Beratern umgeben, die die Art von Stammbaum schwingen, die ihm fehlt.

Und einige Beamte des Weißen Hauses machen sich bereits auf unfaire Angriffe von rechts auf die von ihnen ausgewählte schwarze Frau gefasst. Sie sind davon überzeugt, dass der spätere Kandidat einen einwandfreien Lebenslauf haben muss. “Es muss jemand sein, der über unbestrittene Qualifikationen verfügt, damit es nicht so aussieht, als wäre es eine nicht qualifizierte Person”, sagte ein hochrangiger Biden-Beamter, der über mögliche Nominierungen von Gerichten unter der Bedingung der Anonymität sprach, um Gedanken aus dem Westflügel auszutauschen.

Unter den potenziellen Kandidaten, die für einen Sitz am Obersten Gerichtshof ausgewählt werden, hat Frau Childs einen Hintergrund, der sich von den jüngsten Kandidaten unterscheidet. Im Gegensatz zu acht der neun derzeitigen Richter am Obersten Gerichtshof besuchte Frau Childs, 54, keine Ivy League-Universität. Ihre Mutter arbeitete für Southern Bell in Columbia, SC, und Frau Childs erhielt ein Stipendium an der University of South Florida. Später absolvierte sie die juristische Fakultät der University of South Carolina und war die erste schwarze Frau, die Partnerin in einer der größten Anwaltskanzleien des Bundesstaates wurde. In der Art einer früheren Generation von Juristen stieg sie in der Staatspolitik auf, bevor sie auf die Bank berufen wurde. Frau Childs war eine hochrangige Beamtin in der Arbeitsabteilung von South Carolina, bevor sie in die staatliche Arbeitnehmerentschädigungsbehörde berufen wurde.

“Sie ist die Art von Person, die die Art von Erfahrungen hat, die sie zu einer guten Ergänzung des Obersten Gerichtshofs machen würden”, sagte Clyburn.

Herr Clyburn, dessen begehrte Unterstützung dazu beigetragen hat, die Listungskampagne von Herrn Biden vor der Grundschule in South Carolina im letzten Jahr wiederzubeleben, war in ihrem Namen besonders aktiv, als Teil dessen, was seine Berater als seine wichtigste Bitte an die Verwaltung bezeichnen. Die 80-jährige Hauspeitsche hat sich mit Frau Harris für Frau Childs ausgesprochen. Frau Remus; und Senator Richard J. Durbin aus Illinois, Vorsitzender des Justizausschusses.

Bakari Sellers, eine demokratische politische Kommentatorin, die Frau Harris nahe steht, hat auch Mitglieder des inneren Kreises des Vizepräsidenten auf Frau Childs aufmerksam gemacht, die 2010 von Herrn Obama auf die Bundesbank berufen wurde.

“Nicht nur für unsere Partei, sondern auch für die Justiz ist es wichtig, jemanden zu haben, der Erfahrungen gemacht hat”, sagte Sellers.

Was einige dieser Beamten dazu veranlasst, mit einer aggressiveren Form der Anwaltschaft an die Öffentlichkeit zu gehen, sind zwei Entwicklungen.

Zuerst sahen sie das Zeug zu einer kurzen Liste in einer Ruth Marcus-Kolumne in der Washington Post Anfang dieses Monats, in der zwei potenzielle Breyer-Nachfolger genannt wurden, die wie Frau Childs jung genug sind, um einige Jahrzehnte auf dem Platz zu dienen. Die beiden genannten – der US-Bezirksrichter Ketanji Brown Jackson aus Washington, DC, und die Richterin des Obersten Gerichtshofs von Kalifornien, Leondra Kruger – haben beide einen Abschluss in Rechtswissenschaften der Ivy League und wichtige Verbindungen. Frau Jackson, 50, war Angestellte bei Herrn Breyer selbst, und Frau Kruger, 44, war stellvertretende Generalstaatsanwältin von Herrn Obama

Es gibt eine Handvoll anderer schwarzer Frauen in den Vierzigern mit Elite-Qualifikationen, die die Aufmerksamkeit des Gesetzgebers auf sich gezogen haben, darunter einige im Justizausschuss. Es gibt Danielle Holley-Walker, die Dekanin der juristischen Fakultät der Howard University, und Leslie Abrams Gardner, eine Richterin am Bundesbezirksgericht in Georgia, die eine jüngere Schwester von Stacey Abrams ist.

Wichtiger ist die Frage des Timings.

Es gibt relativ wenige schwarze Frauen in den Bundesberufungsgerichten, in denen Präsidenten ihre Kandidaten häufig vor den Obersten Gerichtshof ziehen. Sehr bald wird es jedoch eine weitere freie Stelle beim US-Berufungsgericht für den District of Columbia Circuit geben – was ein Sprungbrett für das Oberste Gericht sein kann -, wenn Richter Merrick B. Garland zurücktritt, um Generalstaatsanwalt zu werden. Frau Childs könnte besser in der Lage sein, zum Obersten Gerichtshof aufzusteigen, wenn sie diesem Berufungsgericht angehören würde, sagen einige ihrer Bewunderer.

“Dort ist sofort eine Stelle frei, daher würde ich mich für ihre Berücksichtigung des Gleichstromkreises einsetzen”, sagte Butterfield, selbst ehemaliger Richter am Obersten Gerichtshof des Bundesstaates, über Frau Childs. “Und wann und ob es eine freie Stelle am Obersten Gerichtshof gibt, sollte sie auch dafür in Betracht gezogen werden.”

Eine weitere mögliche Kandidatin für einen Gerichtssitz ist Cheri Beasley, die ihre Wiederwahl als Oberste Richterin des Obersten Gerichtshofs von North Carolina im November mit 412 Stimmen verloren hat. Sie besuchte auch eine öffentliche Universität und kletterte durch die Justiz über den Dienst an Gerichten der unteren Bundesstaaten. Dennoch hat Frau Beasley den Leuten gesagt, dass sie ein Angebot für den offenen Senatssitz von North Carolina im nächsten Jahr erwägt, so eine Demokratin, die mit ihr gesprochen hat.

Wenn es zu einer gerichtlichen Vakanz kommt, bereiten sich mehrere Demokraten darauf vor, dass Spannungen aus der Obama-Ära entstehen, die vom ehemaligen Präsidenten Donald Trump dokumentiert wurden.

Viele Mitglieder des Black Caucus des Kongresses sowie eine Reihe weißer Demokraten glauben, dass die Partei zu eng mit den Eliten verbunden ist und dass diese Wahrnehmung den Republikanern nur während der Wahlkampfsaison politisches Futter gibt.

“Dies ist nicht kritisch gegenüber den Harvards oder den Yales, aber ich denke, es gibt einige großartige Anwälte, die wirklich, wirklich klug sind und von anderen Orten auf dieser Erde kommen”, sagte Senator Jon Tester aus Montana, wo die Demokraten alles verloren haben drei Festzeltrennen im letzten Jahr. “Und ich denke, wir sollten sie berücksichtigen.”

Vi Lyles, der Bürgermeister von Charlotte, sagte: “Wenn Sie die breiteste Perspektive auf das haben, was im Land vor sich geht, sind Sie ein besserer Entscheidungsträger und Führer.”

Noch heikler sind die anhaltenden Frustrationen unter den schwarzen Führern, von denen viele staatliche Schulen oder historisch schwarze Institutionen besuchten, über Obamas unabhängige Behandlung des Black Caucus im Kongress und die scheinbare Präferenz seiner Regierung für Kandidaten mit Elite-Qualifikationen.

“Er war für Ivy League-Nominierte prädisponiert, da können wir uns alle einig sein”, sagte Butterfield.

Mr. Sellers war noch stumpfer. “Ich liebe Barack Obama, aber es gab eine Kultur der Ivy League, die vom Weißen Haus ausging, und wir müssen uns davon entfernen”, sagte er.

Die Frustration über Herrn Obama gipfelte in seiner Wahl von Herrn Garland für den Obersten Gerichtshof nach dem Tod von Justiz Antonin Scalia im Jahr 2016. Einige Kongressdemokraten glaubten, der frühere Präsident hätte Republikaner unter Druck setzen und Demokraten mit Energie versorgen können, wenn er eine schwarze Frau gewählt hätte und waren wütend, als er sagte, er habe nicht “eine schwarze Lesbe von Skokie” gesucht.

Was Herr Clyburn nur schräg sagen wird, ist, dass Herr Biden nicht nur schwarzen Wählern für seine Nominierung etwas schuldet, sondern auch Afroamerikanern zu Dank verpflichtet ist, die seine Kandidatur in South Carolina wiederbelebt haben, und denen im ganzen Süden, die seine Nominierung drei Tage später beinahe zementiert haben als er am Super Tuesday die Region fegte.

Einige afroamerikanische Demokraten glauben, dass sich schwarze Amerikaner hinter der schwarzen Frau versammeln werden, die Mr. Biden nominiert, und vermuten, dass Mr. Clyburn nach einer Begründung sucht, um seinen Heimatstaat zu verbessern und sein Erbe zu polieren.

Dennoch predigen nur wenige Politiker mehr als Herr Biden über die Wichtigkeit des „Tanzens mit dem, der Sie gebracht hat“, wie der Präsident oft sagt. Bislang konnte Herr Clyburn zwei seiner engsten Verbündeten in die Verwaltung berufen, wobei die ehemalige Repräsentantin Marcia Fudge zur Wohnungssekretärin ernannt wurde und Jaime Harrison als Leiter des Demokratischen Nationalkomitees gewonnen wurde.

Auf die Frage, ob er Frau Childs vor dem Obersten Gerichtshof unterstützen könne, sagte Senator Tim Scott aus South Carolina, ein Republikaner und der erste seit dem Wiederaufbau gewählte Senator der südlichen Schwarzen, er sei nicht bereit, sich zu verpflichten. Aber er lobte sie für ihren “sehr guten Ruf” und sagte, ihre Ernennung “würde die positiven und kraftvollen Fortschritte widerspiegeln, die wir im großartigen Bundesstaat South Carolina gemacht haben.”

Herr Scott war jedoch direkter, als er gefragt wurde, ob Herr Biden es den schwarzen Wählern von South Carolina schuldete, angesichts der Rolle, die sie auf seinem Weg zur Präsidentschaft spielten.

“Jim Clyburn würde es sagen”, sagte er mit einem Lächeln.

Categories
Politics

Merrick Garland lawyer basic affirmation hearings to start Monday

Merrick Garland attorney general confirmation hearings to begin Monday

Judge Merrick Garland, US President-elect Joe Biden’s candidate for US Attorney General, speaks as Biden listens as he announces his nominations for the Justice Department on January 7, 2021 at his interim headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

Merrick Garland is finally getting his Senate day.

Garland, President Joe Biden’s election as attorney general, will appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Monday on the first day of his confirmation hearings, which are expected to continue later this week.

The hearings were postponed due to partisan disputes while Democrats and Republicans struggled to reach a power-sharing deal in the evenly-divided Senate.

Those delays came after Garland was denied no hearings at all in 2016 when former President Barack Obama appointed the centrist judge to the Supreme Court following the death of Justice Antonin Scalia, the Conservative associate.

The federal appeals court judge is expected to be quickly confirmed – likely in early March – though he may be grilled uncomfortably, especially by the panel’s Republicans.

Senator Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the senior Republican on the Justice Committee, has stated that Garland will be asked how he will deal with the federal investigation into Biden’s son Hunter Biden related to the younger Biden’s finances. Hunter Biden has announced that the federal prosecutor is investigating his “tax affairs”.

All in all, however, the hearings are unlikely to be dramatic. In a statement, Democratic Committee Chairman Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois described Garland as “a consensus decision whose merits should be swiftly confirmed”.

Question of independence

Garland has been a judge on the US Court of Appeals for DC Circuit since 1997 and served as the chief judge in the court from 2013 to 2020, which was considered the most important except for the Supreme Court.

The 68-year-old, if confirmed, will head the Justice Department, which will be crucial to Biden’s agenda for criminal justice reform. Biden has also said that he hopes that by choosing Garland he can demonstrate a contrast to President Donald Trump’s use of the department for selfish ends.

“We must restore the DOJ’s honor, integrity and independence to this nation that has been so badly damaged,” Biden said during a January speech introducing Garland.

“I want to be clear to those in charge of this department who you are going to serve: you are not going to work for me. You are not the lawyer for the president or the vice president,” added Biden. “Your loyalty is not to me. It is to the law, the constitution and the people of this nation.”

Trump’s four-year tenure in the Justice Department was marked by controversy.

His first attorney general, Jeff Sessions, was forced to resign for good in 2018 after Trump attacked him for months for deciding to withdraw from former Special Adviser Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation.

William Barr, Trump’s last attorney general, has been charged with manipulating the prosecution of Trump allies Roger Stone and Michael Flynn and making misleading statements related to Müller’s final report.

Garland is committed to maintaining its independence.

“The essence of the rule of law is that the same cases are treated equally: there is no rule for Democrats and one for Republicans, one rule for friends, another for enemies, one rule for the powerful and another for the powerless,” he said last month.

Civil Rights Examination

It is likely that Democrats will push Garland to look at how his views on criminal justice align with Biden’s pledge to strengthen racial justice in the legal system. Civil rights groups have found that Garland has demonstrated a conservative stance in his decisions as a judge.

“Judge Garland very rarely ruled in favor of defendants in Fourth Amendment cases and has generally deemed law enforcement action appropriate in the circumstances,” the American Civil Liberties Union wrote in a 2016 report, while Garland stood under the Supreme Court’s consideration.

The report also found that Garlands “notable judgment rulings similarly display a pro-criminal perspective”.

During his campaign, Biden pledged to reduce the number of people detained in the United States and to eradicate inequalities in sentencing.

During his early days in office, he ordered the Justice Department to restrict contracts with private prisons and made other promises related to racial justice in the ministry. While the administration has been in place for a month, rights groups have been pushing for more to be done.

The Capitol Rebellion

An early test for Garland could be the result of the January 6 uprising in the Capitol, which led to increasing calls for a new domestic terrorism law to help the Federal Bureau of Investigation – part of the DOJ – find members help the pro-Trump mob who led the attack.

Federal prosecutors have said the investigation into the attack is likely unprecedented in the DOJ’s history, and that more than 200 people have already been charged.

While law enforcement groups have advocated such laws, civil rights groups have suggested that such bills fall hardest on already persecuted communities such as blacks and Muslims.

Garland is expected to fall back on his work in 1995 to oversee law enforcement resulting from the Oklahoma City bombing carried out by white supremacists.

Garland not only assembled the litigation team in this case, but also drafted the Department of Justice’s plan to respond to critical incidents and “oversaw the US Marshal Service Vulnerability Assessment for Federal Institutions.”

Subscribe to CNBC Pro for the live TV stream, deep insights and analysis of how to invest during the next president’s term.

Categories
Politics

Democrats’ Huge Tent Helped Them Win. Now It Threatens Biden’s Agenda.

Democrats’ Big Tent Helped Them Win. Now It Threatens Biden’s Agenda.

Mr Sanders targeted the latest news that a moderate think tank, Third Way, was working on a project to put the Democrats at the center of the mid-term election. He said topics such as reducing student debt, raising the minimum wage to $ 15 an hour and tackling climate change were “political winners”.

The American working class today – white, black, Latin American – hurts. They want us to respond vigorously, ”he said. “If we do that, I think they will reward us in 2022. If we fail, Republicans can go around and say, ‘Hey, you gave these people the House, the Senate, and the White House and they didn’t do anything for you,’ We’re not going to do well in 2022. ‘

Still, the anchoring of moderate senators – and the current respect for the president – is a challenge for activists hoping to sway the administration. And while progressive elected officials are confident Mr Biden will end up on their side, a growing chorus of activists awaits him to act more immediately.

K Trainor, a student activist who has worked with progressive groups to convert students to Democrats, said Mr Biden’s response at City Hall was deeply disappointing. She said that if the government didn’t deliver for young voters, it would be more difficult to convince them to stand in future elections.

“I think a lot of people in my generation ask, ‘Where’s the guts?'” Said Ms. Trainor. “It feels like they’re backtracking and we’re not even 100 days in.”

Rev. William J. Barber II, a co-chair of the Campaign of the Poor who organized the West Virginia workers’ meeting with Mr. Manchin, said the debate reflected an ugly underbelly of democratic politics. While poor and low-income workers, especially those who are racial minorities or young people, form the core of the democratic base, the politics that matter most to them have often been sacrificed on the basis of political calculations.

You are the human cost of the big tent, he said.

“Democrats ran on it, they put it on their platform and they said this has to be done,” said Dr. Barber. “It would be the ultimate task and betrayal to come here and have the power to do it and then retire.”

Categories
Politics

Trump to make first post-presidency speech as CPAC keynote

Trump to make first post-presidency speech as CPAC keynote

President Donald Trump speaks to supporters at Joint Base Andrews before he boarded Air Force One for the last time as President on Jan. 20, 2021 at Joint Base Andrews, Maryland.

Pete Marovich | Pool | Getty Images

Former President Donald Trump is expected to deliver a keynote address at the conclusion of the Conservative Political Action Conference in Orlando, Florida next weekend, sources familiar with the plans told NBC News.

Trump is due to speak about the future of the Republican Party and the Conservative movement, say sources familiar with the plan.

The full list has not yet been released and is subject to change.

The event would be Trump’s first extended public appearance on camera since he left office last month.

For the past few weeks, Trump has continued to rage against top Republicans who stand up against him, including Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell; Senator John Thune, the No. 2 Republican in the Senate; and longtime GOP politician Karl Rove, according to people familiar with the matter.

Trump spokesman Jason Miller responded to CNBC’s request for comment on the matter via email: “Fake news. We are focused on getting the House and Senate back in 2022.”

The former president said he plans to support several key competitors who support his “Make America Great Again” agenda.

Advisors have told Trump that, according to his own strategists, Republican voters don’t want to see an all-out war in the GOP. Instead, voters would rather see Trump focus his attacks on Biden and top Democrats, advisors say.

Rep Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., A Trump defense attorney in Congress, tweeted that grassroots Republicans would be rejected by the party if they don’t accept the former president’s agenda.

Although Trump escaped conviction on his second impeachment trial, he now faces several serious criminal and civil investigations that could be harder to beat. At least one investigation holds the potential for Trump to be jailed if convicted. On January 20, he lost his protection from prosecution while holding the office of president.

“There are a lot of balls in the air in the potential criminal arena and if I were Donald Trump I wouldn’t just rest,” said Joseph Tacopina, a senior New York City criminal lawyer.

Trump spoke at the CPAC several times during his presidency, often making some of his longest speeches, and using his remarks to bolster his conservative base.

Last year’s event organizers came under criticism for their precautions with Covid-19 screening after a New Jersey man attending CPAC tested positive for the coronavirus.

This year’s event will take place from Thursday, February 25th to Sunday, February 28th. Trump is expected to close the events over the weekend.

– CNBC’s Dan Mangan and Brian Schwartz contributed to this report

Categories
Politics

Justice Dept. Is Stated to Be Inspecting Stone’s Potential Ties to Capitol Rioters

Justice Dept. Is Said to Be Examining Stone’s Possible Ties to Capitol Rioters

WASHINGTON – The Justice Department is investigating communications between right-wing extremists who violated the Capitol and Roger J. Stone Jr., a close associate of former President Donald J. Trump, to see if Mr. Stone played a role in the extremists’ plans To disrupt the confirmation of President Biden’s election victory, a person familiar with the matter said on Saturday.

Should investigators find any news that Mr. Stone knew about or was participating in these plans, they would have a factual basis to launch a full criminal investigation into him, according to the person who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss continued investigation. While this is far from certain, prosecutors at the U.S. law firm in Washington will likely if they find this connection.

Mr. Stone, a self-described fixer for Mr. Trump, escaped a 40-month sentence when the former president commuted his sentence in July and pardoned him in late December. Mr Stone had been convicted of seven offenses, including obstructing a House of Representatives investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Russia’s efforts to meddle in the 2016 election, lie to Congress and manipulate witnesses. However, this pardon does not protect Mr. Stone from future law enforcement actions.

Justice Department officials have been debating for weeks whether to open a full investigation into Mr. Stone, the person said. While Mr. Stone was speaking at an arson rally the day before the attack, right-wing extremists serving as his bodyguards and standing outside the Capitol, these actions are not crimes themselves.

But the FBI also has videos and other information suggesting that in the days leading up to and including the day of the attack, Mr. Stone was linked to men who eventually stormed the building and broke the law, those with the investigation said familiar person. This has given investigators a window in which to examine communications to see if Mr Stone knew of any plans to break through the complex.

The Washington Post previously reported that the Justice Department was investigating Mr Stone’s possible links with right-wing extremists at the Capitol.

The New York Times has identified at least six members of the Oath Keepers, a right-wing extremist group formed by former military and law enforcement officials who guarded Mr. Stone and were later seen in the Capitol after a pro-Trump mob violently builds the building. Prosecutors have accused two of these men of plotting to attack Congress.

A Justice Department spokesman declined to comment. Mr. Stone did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

In a statement posted online this month, Mr. Stone denied any role in the “lawless attack” and said that members of the Oath Guards “should be prosecuted” if there is evidence that they have broken the law. He added that he “saw no evidence of any illegal activity by members of the group”.

A day after the Capitol attack, Michael Sherwin, the US attorney in Washington, told reporters that he would not rule out bringing charges against Mr. Trump or his associates for their possible role in inciting or otherwise encouraging the mob.

“We look at all of the actors, not just the people who entered the building,” Sherwin said. When asked if such goals would include Mr. Trump, who admonished supporters during a rally near the White House on Jan. 6, telling them that they “could never retake our country with weakness,” Mr. Sherwin stood by his testimony . “We all look at actors,” he said. “If the evidence fits the elements of a crime, they will be charged.”

Another member of Mr. Sherwin’s office soon appeared to be tracing those remarks back to them, suggesting that individuals in Mr. Trump’s orbit were unlikely to be examined. But Mr. Sherwin later said he stood by his original statement.

Categories
Politics

Biden declares catastrophe, thousands and thousands boil water after energy outages

Biden declares disaster, millions boil water after power outages

City workers and volunteers will hand out bottled water at Delmar Stadium in Houston, Texas, USA on Wednesday, February 19, 2021.

Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images

President Joe Biden has endorsed a statement of major disaster for Texas as the state grapples with widespread power outages and water shortages in freezing winter conditions, the Federal Emergency Management Agency said on Saturday.

The move unlocks federal funding for individuals in Texas, grants for temporary home and home repairs, and low-cost loans to cover uninsured property damage.

Millions of Texans are grappling with power outages and more than half of the state are suffering from disrupted water supplies as the boiling water reports are effective.

The statement also provides funding for cost-sharing with state and local governments, as well as some private nonprofits, for emergency response and risk reduction measures. Help is available in dozens of counties.

More than 15.1 million people faced water disruptions in Texas on Saturday after freezing conditions disrupted more than 1,300 public water systems and led to boiling water reports, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality said Saturday.

The federal government has already approved emergency statements for Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana, and shipped supplies such as generators, blankets, water, and meals to Texas last week.

“This is great news for the people of Dallas after a terrible week,” Dallas Mayor Eric Johnson wrote in a tweet. “The damage caused by this storm is great and the declaration of the disaster will help our city to recover.”

Continue reading:
The power failure in Texas sparked a feud over Republican oversight of the power industry
How the Texas power grid went down and what could stop it from happening again

Biden plans to visit Texas as early as next week to assess the federal response. The president said he will make a final decision after making sure his presence does not hamper recovery efforts. The government has worked closely with Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott on disaster relief.

“I thank President Biden for his assistance in responding to the effects of winter weather on our state,” Abbott said in a statement. “While this partial approval is an important first step, Texas will continue to work with our federal partners to ensure that all eligible Texans have access to the relief they need.”

Texas’s Electric Reliability Council (ERCOT) announced Friday that it has returned to normal conditions, restoring power for millions of customers. More than 60,000 people in Texas were still without power at 4:00 p.m. ET on Saturday, according to PowerOutage.us.

A shopper walks past a bare shelf as people stock up on essentials at the HEB grocery store in Austin, Texas on February 18, 2021.

Joe Raedle | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Texas Division of Emergency Management’s chief Nim Kidd said at a news conference Saturday that distributing bottled water is still the number one priority.

The state has ordered 9.9 million water bottles and received a total of 5.5 million bottles. The military provides water and food by air while the state utilities work to restore water supplies.

Around 156,000 people still have no water at all, said Toby Baker, executive director of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality. “I understand the public is extremely frustrated right now,” said Baker.

In addition to the declaration of the major disaster, the US Environmental Protection Agency issued an emergency waiver for Texas on Friday. The immediate exemption enables the state to temporarily waive certain fuel standards in order to address the gas shortage in the affected areas.

Texas refineries had disrupted about a fifth of the country’s oil production during the outages and freezing temperatures. Oil prices fell from recent highs on Friday as companies were ready to resume production as soon as electricity services resumed.

Categories
Politics

Searching for Recent Begin With Iraq, Biden Avoids Setting Crimson Strains With Iran

Seeking Fresh Start With Iraq, Biden Avoids Setting Red Lines With Iran

Diplomats and military officials said Biden’s bigger goal is to reduce hostilities between the United States and Iran and its representatives in the region, including Iraq, and to seek a way back to diplomacy with Tehran. This week the United States opened new negotiations with Iran to curtail its nuclear program.

The rapprochement comes because the Biden government is simultaneously staring at deadly militias in Iraq that officials believe are acting with Tehran’s aid and perhaps orders. Attacks by Iran or its proxies on Americans could undermine the broader diplomatic aim, officials said.

They could also turn on its head a new attempt by the United States to convince Iraq to turn away from Iran – without expecting to break its spiritual, economic, and cultural ties – by offering incentives instead of threats.

“So that America can pursue our values ​​and interests worldwide, we have to get involved in the world,” said Ned Price, the spokesman for the State Department, after the attack in Erbil. “And of course there are additional risks involved in some parts of the world.”

So far, according to two senior Defense Department officials, there has been no extensive discussion in the Pentagon Central Command about a specific military response to the strike in Erbil on Monday as the US and Iraqi authorities investigate who launched the attack. Both Mr Blinken and Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III, who have completed three combat tours in Iraq, have spoken to their Iraqi counterparts to offer assistance with the investigation.

Officials blame Iranian militias such as Kataib Hezbollah and Asa’ib Ahl al-Haq, who have been responsible for similar previous strikes, the Erbil missiles. But officials from the White House, State Department and Pentagon have stopped making specific allegations.

“What an important test for the new government,” said Simone Ledeen, the Pentagon’s chief administrative officer until last month, on Twitter on Monday. “Will be interested to see if there is an answer.”

Iraqis have long been suspicious of American officials who, after ordering a military invasion in 2003 and the ousting of Saddam Hussein, are still held responsible for the security vacuum that followed the disintegration of the Iraqi army by the US occupation authorities. Anger at the United States rose again last month when the Trump administration pardoned four American security companies for their roles in the 2007 massacre of 17 Iraqi civilians in Nisour Square, Baghdad.

As Vice President during the Obama administration, Mr. Biden was among those who oversaw the end of the American-led Iraq war and the withdrawal of the last 50,000 combat troops in 2011, only to be surprised by the rise of Islamic State two years later.

Officials said Mr Biden has a deeply personal interest in Iraq, where his son Beau served in the Army National Guard and was exposed to toxic cremation pits that may have led to the brain tumor that killed him in 2015.

His Secretary of State, Mr Blinken, has begun what a senior State Department official on Friday referred to as a review of American policy in Iraq that will allow for a change in approach. The review will include feedback from the Pentagon before it goes to the White House, possibly as early as next month.

The government is considering bringing hundreds of diplomats, security guards and contractors back to the embassy in Baghdad. At a time of mounting tension with Iran, the numbers were reduced in May 2019, which has resulted in a fluctuating workforce since then.

The State Department is not yet ready to reopen its consulate in the southern Iraqi city of Basra, an important wiretapping post near the Iranian border, which the Trump administration closed in September 2018 after militias left the airport area where it was stationed had been shot in the air. Nobody was injured in this attack.

The department is also looking into expanding the limits the Trump administration has placed on how much power the Iraqi government can buy from Iran – an agreement that critics warn could fund Tehran’s aggression but provides a lifeline for millions of people that would otherwise get by without electricity.

Iraqi bank officials met with American diplomats this week on the issue, which is currently forcing Baghdad to ask Washington to stop buying energy every few months without imposing sanctions.

Two other government officials from Biden said the US Agency for International Development is also considering sending more humanitarian aid to parts of Iraq, mainly to the western and northern regions of the country hardest hit by the Islamic State.

But several Pentagon officials and senior military officers said it was unclear what the Biden team’s red lines look like when it comes to protecting American personnel in Iraq from Iran or its proxies.

Following a rocket attack that killed an American contractor in December 2019, the United States blamed Kataib Hezbollah and bombed five of its bases. This resulted in a siege of the U.S. embassy, ​​with protesters detaining diplomats in the extensive grounds for two days, and prompted Mr Trump to order a military strike that killed Iran’s most revered general while visiting Baghdad .

David Schenker, Trump’s deputy undersecretary of state for Middle East policy, said it was the responsibility of the Shiite-led Iraqi government to curtail Iranian-backed militias.

“I don’t think you’ll behave better in Iraq if you slander Iran,” said Schenker, now a senior fellow at the Washington Institute for Middle East Policy, in an interview. “Ultimately, it’s all about Iran – the missiles, the weapons, the funding and the direction all come from Tehran.”

Military officials say 14 107-millimeter rockets were fired in the Erbil attack, but six failed. The attack on territories controlled by Kurdish forces has raised concerns about security vulnerabilities in what is considered the safest region of Iraq.

A little-known group known as Awliya al Dam or Guardians of the Blood assumed responsibility for the attack but did not provide any evidence. The group assumed responsibility for two bomb attacks on US military convoys last August.

An anti-rocket system was in place and operating at Erbil airport at the time of the attack, but the missiles landed in an area not covered by the system, an American military official said.

U.S. commanders said the 2,500 troops now residing in Iraq – roughly half the number from last summer – would not only be enough to act as a bulwark against Iranian proxies and other influences, but also to help Iraqi security forces find out remaining Islamic bags to help state fighters.

The Secretary General of the Organization of the North Atlantic Treaty, Jens Stoltenberg, announced on Thursday that it would increase its military mission in Iraq from 500 employees to 4,000 soldiers and expand training beyond Baghdad.

Jane Arraf reported from Amman, Jordan.