Category: Politics

Categories
Politics

Biden company tax hike would have little impression on enterprise: Wharton examine

Biden considers health care public option in economic recovery plan

The proposed increase in the corporate tax rate in President Joe Biden’s landmark infrastructure plan will not result in a significant reduction in corporate investment, according to a new study by the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.

Of greatest interest to Wall Street is Biden’s plan to increase the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, which would amount to partially reversing former President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts.

Wharton estimates that increasing the corporate rate to 28% from 2022 to 2031 would generate an additional $ 891.6 billion and, possibly surprisingly, would have little impact on corporate investment in the short term.

The school said this is because companies with significant capital investments may postpone a tax incentive called bonus write-offs until years when the Biden increases could take effect.

Bonus write-offs allow companies to deduct a large portion of the purchase price of certain assets, such as capital goods, immediately instead of having to write down their value over several years. Trump’s 2017 tax cuts doubled the bonus write-off deduction from 50% for qualifying properties to 100%.

“An increase in the statutory corporate tax rate is expected to increase corporate investment in the short term,” the Wharton researchers wrote. “Under the current accelerated depreciation regime, the marginal effective tax rates on corporate investments are low regardless of the key interest rate. As a result, an increase in the corporate tax rate does not have a material impact on the normal return on investment, but tax rents and returns on existing capital.”

Neither the White House nor the Treasury Department immediately responded to CNBC’s request for comment.

Still, Wharton found that the negligible to positive impact of a rate hike on businesses would be offset if Congress approved the American Job Plan’s minimum tax on book income, which would reduce the value of depreciation.

The infrastructure plan marks Biden’s first detailed tax proposal since he took office earlier this year. The mammoth plan is expected to see significant changes as it makes its way through Congress, where Republicans agree in their opposition to the tax hike.

Democrats who choose to pursue the infrastructure plan via a budget vote will need almost unanimous support from their caucus to pass it without GOP support. But Democratic support also remains in question after Senator Joe Manchin, DW.Va., made it clear earlier this week that he’s not a fan of increasing the corporate rate to 28%.

The Biden plan would reduce the federal debt

The school’s most recent study, released Wednesday morning, also found that the American government’s employment plan will generate $ 2.1 trillion in tax revenue and spend $ 2.7 trillion in spending between 2021 and 2030.

By 2050, the proposed tax increases and repairs to American infrastructure will reduce US debt by 6.4% and GDP by 0.8% in 2050 from current law.

“First of all, the federal debt will rise by 1.7 percent by 2031 because of new spending in the [American Jobs Plan] exceeds the new revenue generated, “wrote the researchers.” However, after the new editions of the AJP end in 2029, their tax increases will persist – as a result, the federal debt will decrease by 6.4 percent by 2050 compared to the current legal basis. “

The relatively modest decline in economic growth through 2050 is in large part due to the fact that infrastructure improvements will allow Americans to be more productive in the years to come, the school said.

Repairing transportation infrastructures can, for example, help increase productivity in the long term if US workers spend less time in traffic or commuting around a vulnerable bridge.

“Public investments include new spending on transit infrastructure, research and development, and supply chains for domestic manufacturing,” the researchers wrote. “These are seen as investments in ‘public capital’ that increase the productivity of private capital and labor.”

On the revenue side, the Wharton School noted that the American employment plan would be funded through a combined increase in corporate tax rate, a minimum tax on corporate book income, an increase in the tax rate on foreign profits, and the elimination of tax breaks for fossil fuels.

Categories
Politics

Justin Fairfax Accuses Terry McAuliffe of Treating Him Like Emmett Until

Justin Fairfax Accuses Terry McAuliffe of Treating Him Like Emmett Till

Terry McAuliffe, the leading candidate in this year’s Democratic primary for governor of Virginia, faced a series of attacks from his rivals during a debate Tuesday night to reduce his broad support from black voters. On the most extraordinary broadside, State Governor Justin Fairfax accused Mr McAuliffe of treating him like George Floyd or Emmett Till after Mr Fairfax was charged with sexual assault by two women in 2019.

Mr McAuliffe, a white former governor of the state who is backed by many of the state’s top black elected officials, publicly called for Mr Fairfax to step down earlier this year.

Mr Fairfax’s statements on Tuesday comparing himself to two blacks killed in episodes of white violence were the clearest attempt by any of the three black contestants in the race to racially distinguish themselves from Mr McAuliffe. Who wants to reclaim the office they held from 2014 to 2018?

The charge came at the end of the debate, the first for the five Virginia Democrats running for governor. In response to a question asking candidates to imagine the future of law enforcement in Virginia, Fairfax said theoretical descriptions are unnecessary as he is a living embodiment of the harm that false accusations and a rush for judgment can cause.

“Everyone on this stage called for my immediate resignation, including Terry McAuliffe three minutes after a press release was issued,” said Fairfax. “He treated me like George Floyd, he treated me like Emmett Till, no due process, took my guilt immediately. I have a son and I have a daughter and I don’t want my daughter to be attacked, I don’t want my son to be falsely accused. And this is the real world that we live in. Therefore, we need to tell the truth to power and understand how it will affect people’s lives. “

Mr McAuliffe did not reply to Mr Fairfax at the debate stage. His spokesman declined to respond to the comments.

In February 2019, two women accused Mr. Fairfax of sexually assaulting them in different episodes – allegations that Mr. Fairfax had always denied. Mr Fairfax faced a flurry of demands for his resignation. Weeks later, in a speech on the Virginia Senate floor, he compared himself to lynch victims.

Mr Fairfax wasn’t the only candidate Tuesday night trying to separate black voters from Mr McAuliffe. The race’s sparse public poll has shown that Mr McAuliffe has sizeable advantages over his four opponents, and no poll has shown he has less than a two-to-one advantage over his closest rival.

Jennifer McClellan, a senator running for governor, accused Mr. McAuliffe of underfunding the state’s probation system, cutting contracts with the National Rifle Association during his tenure as governor and late campaigning for racial justice.

“Racial justice is more than just criminal justice reform,” said Ms. McClellan, who is black. “It’s embedded in every system we have in government, and I didn’t need George Floyd’s murder or the Unite the Right rally to teach me that.”

During his speech, Mr McAuliffe highlighted his relationships with Mr Northam and President Biden, two Democrats who both owe their offices to strong relationships with and support from black voters. He highlighted his move to restore the voting rights of 206,000 offenders in the state, saying every police officer in the state should wear a body camera “so we can see what’s going on.”

“Thank goodness we had all of these people there who had these cell phones when George Floyd was murdered,” he said.

Mr McAuliffe made little mention of his rivals during the debate, except to remind the audience that Ms. McClellan was a more frequent partner of his when he was governor. But at the end of the debate, Mr Fairfax tried to define himself as the talkative former governor’s main competitor.

“There seem to be two rules up here, one where the governor can speak for as long as he wants and do what he wants and one for everyone else,” Fairfax said. “I think that’s part of the problem that we have so many differences in our society.”

Categories
Politics

U.S. backs away from boycott

U.S. backs away from boycott

Chinese citizens walk past a sign for the Beijing Winter Olympics in Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province, China.

Lintao Zhang | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – The State Department on Tuesday evening denied considering a joint boycott with allies of the 2022 Beijing Winter Olympics.

“Our position on the 2022 Olympics has not changed. We have not and are not discussing a joint boycott with allies and partners,” wrote a senior State Department official in a statement emailed to CNBC.

The department’s spokesman, Ned Price, had initially suggested during a press conference earlier on Tuesday that a boycott of the Olympic Games was one of the ways to combat China’s human rights violations.

The Olympic Games will take place between February 4th and 20th.

Any discussion of a diplomatic boycott of the Olympics would come when the Biden government works to rally allies to push China back internationally. While there is broad support from both parties for a tougher political stance on China, there is little consensus that a boycott would be the most productive route.

Continue reading: Calls for a boycott of the Beijing Olympics are getting louder – and analysts are warning of reprisals from China

A former senior tax officer, who asked anonymity to describe previous considerations on the matter, suggested that such a move would reflect a “Cold War Declaration” on behalf of the United States.

“It’s better to go there and dominate,” the official told CNBC. “It’s better to be Jesse Owens than the 1984 Soviets.” (Owens, a black American sprinter, won four gold medals at the Summer Olympics in Nazi Berlin in 1936. The Soviet Union boycotted the 1984 Los Angeles Games after the US rejected the 1980 Moscow Games in protest against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan .)

Last month, the United States sanctioned two Chinese officials citing their role in serious human rights violations against ethnic minorities in Xinjiang. The Biden government’s sanctions complement those of the European Union, the United Kingdom and Canada.

Beijing previously denied US allegations that it committed genocide against the Uyghurs, a Muslim population native to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region in northwest China. The State Department called such claims “malicious lies” to “smear China” and “thwart China’s development.”

The sanctions followed a controversial meeting between Foreign Minister Antony Blinken and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan and China’s top diplomats Yang Jiechi and State Councilor Wang Yi in Alaska.

Before the Alaska talks, Blinken slammed China’s widespread use of “coercion and aggression” on the international stage, warning that the US would push back if necessary.

“China is using coercion and aggression to systematically undermine Hong Kong’s autonomy, undermine democracy in Taiwan, abuse human rights in Xinjiang and Tibet, and assert maritime claims in the South China Sea that violate international law,” said Flashing at a press conference in Japan.

Biden, who spoke to Chinese President Xi Jinping in February, previously said his stance on China would differ from that of his predecessor in that he would work more closely with allies to secure a knockback against Beijing.

“We will face China’s economic abuse,” said Biden in a speech at the State Department, describing Beijing as America’s “most serious competitor.”

“But we are also ready to work with Beijing if it is in the US interest. We will compete from a position of strength by improving at home and working with our allies and partners.”

Tensions between Beijing and Washington increased under the Trump administration, escalating a trade war and helping to ban Chinese tech companies from doing business in the United States.

Over the past four years, the Trump administration blamed China for a variety of abuses, including intellectual property theft, unfair trade practices and, most recently, the coronavirus pandemic.

Categories
Politics

Capitol Rioters Face the Penalties of Their Selfie Sabotage

Capitol Rioters Face the Consequences of Their Selfie Sabotage

Mr. Biggs’ activities that day were extensively recorded by himself and others. His walk from the Washington Monument was filmed by Eddie Block, a proud boy on a scooter who rolled behind him and identified Mr. Biggs and others in his commentary. Mr. Biggs appeared repeatedly in photographs and recorded himself climbing the Capitol steps.

It was a long, awkward road that got him to this point. Mr. Biggs, 37, also known as Rambo, was a Florida DJ who “romped around nightclubs pounding ecstasy” before joining the military in 2007, he said on his broadcasts. He was posted to Iraq for a year and then to Afghanistan. He made his news media debut after leaving active service in 2012.

In 2008, Michael Hastings, a reporter embedded with Mr. Biggs’ unit in Afghanistan, encouraged him to appear on camera in the news media upon his return to the United States, Mr. Biggs said. Before Mr. Hastings died in a car accident in 2013, Mr. Hastings wrote a profile of General Stanley McChrystal for Rolling Stone, which ended the general’s military career.

Mr. Biggs ‘hiatus came after fueling conspiracy theories about Mr. Hastings’ death. Mr. Jones invited him to Infowars, the far-right, conspiratorial radio and online show.

Mr. Biggs joined Infowars in 2014 and traveled the next year to attend racial justice demonstrations in Ferguson, Missouri, and to the 2016 occupation of Malheur Wildlife Refuge in Oregon by armed right-wing extremists. Escorting Mr. Jones to Republican 2016. At the National Convention, Mr. Biggs fell in a dispute with communist protesters, including one who burned an American flag.

He and another Infowars employee claimed they were burned to put out the fire. In a mundane video called “Joe ‘Rambo’ Biggs: Commie Crushing Crusader!” Mr. Biggs said he “jumped” over the “cops”, tore off the protester’s shirt and gave him a “stomp”.

Police charged protester Gregory “Joey” Johnson of the offense.

When Mr. Johnson’s attorneys saw the videos of Mr. Biggs’s allegations, they demanded that the charges against Mr. Johnson be dropped, which they were. Mr Johnson sued the City of Cleveland and its police force on the grounds that they violated his First Amendment rights. He received a severance payment of $ 225,000.

Categories
Politics

Rep. Alcee Hastings dies, narrowing Democratic Home majority to only 7

Rep. Alcee Hastings dies, narrowing Democratic House majority to just 7

Rep Alcee L. Hastings (D-FL) at a House Committee meeting on Rules to Examine H. Res. 755 charges against Donald John Trump, President of the United States, of high crimes and misdemeanors on Capitol Hill.

Erin Schaff | Pool | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Rep. Alcee Hastings, D-Fla., Died Tuesday after fighting pancreatic cancer for more than two years, NBC News confirmed.

Hastings, who served in the House of Representatives for nearly three decades, was 84 years old. During his career, he has held several important committee and management positions, most recently as vice chairman of the regulatory committee.

After the Congressman’s death, the Democrats have a slim advantage of 218-211 in the House of Representatives, giving the party little margin for error in passing laws. Six places are free.

Hastings, a former federal district judge, was charged in 1988 on charges of bribery and perjury. The Senate voted to remove him from the bank the next year, but did not vote to exclude him from his future office.

This story breaks. Please try again.

Categories
Politics

San Francisco and Different Cities Attempt to Give Artists Regular Revenue

San Francisco and Other Cities Try to Give Artists Steady Income

In San Francisco, officials have announced a pilot program that gives artists a monthly grant. The mayor’s office recently unveiled the initiative, city payments approved by the Arts Commission that provides 130 eligible artists with a guaranteed monthly income of $ 1,000 over a six month period.

A similar experiment began this week in St. Paul, Minnesota. There, a nonprofit is working with the city to pay 25 local artists monthly checks worth $ 500 for the next 18 months. Springboard for the Arts, the organization running the initiative with funding from two foundations, hoped that a successful program could change the national conversation.

In cities like Oakland, California, and Atlanta, whose leaders are part of a 41-member coalition, mayors for guaranteed income, other programs are emerging that aren’t just limited to art workers. The coalition says providing such income will improve race and gender equality. (New York has no such plan in the works, a Department of Cultural Affairs spokesman said last week.)

Interest in guaranteed income – or universal basic income – has grown over the past year as a possible solution to the one-sided economic impact of the pandemic.

“We knew this health crisis would hit artists, and color artists in particular,” San Francisco Mayor London Breed said in a statement. “If we help the arts recover, the arts will help San Francisco recover.”

San Francisco has other such programs – one that pays for paramedic training for San Franciscans and another that is part of a $ 60 million initiative to invest in black children and families.

Since the artist application portal opened on March 25, the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts, which administers the Guaranteed Income program on behalf of San Francisco, has received more than 1,800 responses. (The application deadline is April 15th.)

Deborah Cullinan, the organization’s executive director, said that when people are unstable in the arts, “I think that means we are not stable. An organization is only as stable as its core community. “

Cullinan said she hoped data from the program could be used to inform about the national agenda and that she was already interested in the federal government.

“It’s about finding new and innovative ways to tackle the economic uncertainty in our sector,” added Cullinan.

In St. Paul, the McKnight and Bush Foundations helped get the guaranteed income program off the ground. Laura Zabel, Springboard’s director who oversaw the project, said the monthly payments would help artists afford food and rent. Scholarship recipients will be selected from a pool of past recipients of the organization’s coronavirus emergency grants. The director added that at least 75 percent of the recipients would be people of color.

Categories
Politics

Supreme Courtroom erases ruling in opposition to Trump over his Twitter account

Supreme Court erases ruling against Trump over his Twitter account

President Donald Trump uses a cell phone during a small business reopening panel discussion in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, the United States, on June 18, 2020.

Leah Millis | Reuters

The Supreme Court on Monday overturned a federal appeals court ruling that former President Donald Trump violated the Constitution by blocking his critics on Twitter.

The judges cleared up the decision of the 2nd US Court of Appeals and sent it back to the lower court with instructions to dismiss the case as “in dispute” or no longer active, as Trump is now a private individual. The lawsuit means that the decision of the lower court no longer binds future judges.

A three-judge panel of the 2nd Circle decided unanimously in 2019 that Trump was acting in his official capacity when he used the block function of Twitter. In this way, the court said, Trump effectively banned people from a public forum, which went against the first amendment.

The announcement on Monday was made in an order list and without a written explanation of the court’s arguments. No disagreements were found.

Judge Clarence Thomas unanimously wrote that he agreed to the decision to overturn the 2nd Circuit Opinion as Trump was no longer in office.

Thomas said the petition highlighted “the main legal difficulty surrounding digital platforms – namely that applying old teachings to new digital platforms is seldom easy”.

“For example, respondents indicate that some aspects of Mr. Trump’s account resemble a constitutionally protected public forum,” Thomas wrote. “But it seems pretty strange to say that something is a government forum when a private company has full authority to get rid of it.”

The lawsuit was filed by people who were blocked by Trump on Twitter and the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University.

It was known as Trump v Knight First Amendment Institute, No. 20-197 until the change in administration, at which point the case automatically became known as Biden v Knight First Amendment Institute.

The Justice Department had originally asked the Supreme Court to overturn the 2nd Circle decision, but asked the judges to dismiss the case as in dispute on January 19, the day before President Joe Biden’s inauguration, because of the change in administration .

The Knight First Amendment Institute agreed that the case was contentious for another reason. The legal group said the case came up for discussion after Twitter kicked Trump off its platform in January following the January 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

In a statement, Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight Institute, said the case “is a very simple principle that is fundamental to our democracy: officials cannot exclude people from public forums just because they are with them disagree. “

“While we would have liked the Supreme Court to keep the Second Circle decision on the books, we are pleased that the Court of Appeal’s reasoning has already been adopted by other courts, and we are confident that they will how the public shapes them, will continue to shape them. ” Officials use social media, “said Jaffer.

Categories
Politics

G.O.P. Governor of Arkansas Vetoes Anti-Transgender Invoice

G.O.P. Governor of Arkansas Vetoes Anti-Transgender Bill

Proponents of Arkansas Law say it would protect young people from irreversible medical treatments, and the text of HB 1570 claims, contrary to medical consensus, that “the risks of sex reassignment procedures at this stage of clinical treatment far outweigh the benefits predominate study on these procedures. “

Medical research shows the opposite.

In a 2019 statement against laws restricting minors’ access to gender-affirming treatment, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry said, “Blocking access to timely care has been shown to reduce the risk of suicidal thoughts and other negative mental health issues Increased consequences for adolescents. ”

In a broader sense, the American Psychiatric Association said in an official position paper in 2018 that there is “significant and longstanding medical and psychiatric literature” that shows “clear benefits of medical and surgical interventions” for transgender people.

Sam Brinton, vice president of advocacy and government affairs for the LGBTQ suicide prevention organization Trevor Project, said those who reached out to the group during mental crisis often cited discrimination and public expressions of anti-trans sentiment.

“If this discrimination is given an invoice number, it can be devastating,” said Mx. Brinton cited research that indicated that young trans and non-binary individuals who reported being discriminated against based on their gender identity were twice as likely to attempt suicide and that those who reported having at least one “gender-affirming room.” – this could be a doctor’s office – 25 percent fewer suicide attempts in the past year.

Mr Hutchinson’s veto was noticeable not only because he is a Republican, but also because he signed laws just last month that would allow doctors to refuse treatment to people on the basis of religious or moral objections, and who made it transgender. Women and girls were banned from competing on women’s sports teams in high school or college. (Such measures have become popular with conservative lawmakers, who introduced them in more than two dozen states this year.)

He argued that HB 1570 is “exaggerated, extreme, and not grandfatherly about the young people currently under hormonal treatment,” saying, “The state should not assume that it is jumping into the middle of all medical, human and ethical problems. “

Categories
Politics

Former Matt Gaetz aide says FBI contacted him after sex-trafficking probe information

Former Matt Gaetz aide says FBI contacted him after sex-trafficking probe news

Nathan Nelson, a former employee of U.S. Representative Matt Gaetz, speaks to the news media on April 5, 2021 in Santa Rosa Beach, Florida.

Colin Hackley | Reuters

A former Rep. Matt Gaetz employee said Monday that FBI agents contacted him last week shortly after it became known that the Florida Republican was involved in a federal investigation into the sex trafficking.

Nathan Nelson, Gaetz’s former director of military affairs, said two agents questioned him at his home after hearing from media officials that Nelson knew of Gaetz’s alleged involvement in illegal activities. The media tipsters told the FBI that Nelson resigned based on this knowledge, the ex-aide said.

“I’m here this morning to declare that nothing could be further from the truth,” Nelson said at a press conference in northwest Florida. “Neither I nor any other employee of Congressman Gaetz had knowledge of illegal activities.”

Nelson His departure from Gaetz’s office last fall had nothing to do with investigating the Justice Department’s allegations against the 38-year-old congressman. The investigation into whether Gaetz trafficked an underage girl began in the final months of former President Donald Trump’s tenure, the New York Times reported on Tuesday.

In response to CNBC’s report on Nelson’s statements, Gaetz slammed the FBI, claiming the agency had “literally false media rumors”.

“Sounds familiar?” Gaetz added. He and other Republicans have accused government agencies and officials of conservative bias in recent years. In 2019, Gaetz accused special adviser Robert Mueller, who led the investigation into Russian interference and possible collusion with Trump’s campaign in the 2016 elections, of attempting to “stop Trump”. That investigation, which did not find enough evidence to suggest a collusion between Trump and Russia, has since become a powerful symbol for Republicans feeling targeted by government institutions.

The FBI did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

In the meantime, Gaetz stated in a new comment that he was “absolutely not resigning” and “not being intimidated or blackmailed” by his political opponents.

Gaetz, an outspoken Trump loyalist, has previously denied having a sexual relationship with a 17-year-old girl and paying for her trips with him, and he remained defiant on Monday morning.

“Since it is my turn under the gun, I would like to address the allegations against me directly. First, I never paid for sex. And second, as a grown man, I did not sleep at the age of 17 -old,” wrote Gaetz in the Washington Examiner.

Last week, Gaetz said in a statement that he and his family are threatened in a multi-million dollar extortion program involving a former Justice Department official. Police officers told NBC News that the DOJ is pursuing a separate investigation into Gaetz’s allegations of blackmail.

The sex trafficking investigation with Gaetz emerged from another case involving his former associate, Joel Greenberg, a local Florida official who was charged on numerous charges last summer, including sex trafficking in a child.

Nelson said at the press conference that he was approached by federal agents the day after the Times first reported on alleged sex trafficking.

The former Gaetz aide said he knew nothing specific about the investigation and had never heard of Greenberg before last week’s reports. But the “unsubstantiated allegation” that led the FBI to approach him “continues to convince me” that the allegations against Gaetz “are also fabricated,” Nelson said.

Another Gaetz employee, communications director Luke Ball, resigned last week.

Nelson worked in Gaetz’s office for more than four years before leaving last October, according to his LinkedIn profile. He said Monday that his departure was planned.

Nelson told reporters he was still “loosely linked to Gaetz’s office as a military advisor” in an unpaid capacity, “but said he had not spoken to Gaetz in” several months “.

Gaetz’s office had arranged Nelson’s press conference.

Categories
Politics

Supreme Courtroom Vacates Ruling on Trump’s Twitter Exercise

Supreme Court Vacates Ruling on Trump's Twitter Activity

The Supreme Court on Monday overturned an appeals court ruling that President Donald J. Trump violated the first amendment by banning people from his Twitter account after posting critical comments.

A unanimous three-person jury from the appeals court ruled in 2019 that Mr Trump’s account was a public forum from which he could not exclude people based on their views.

The Supreme Court move was anticipated as Mr Trump is no longer President and Twitter has permanently banned his account.

More surprising was a 12-page consensus opinion from Justice Clarence Thomas, who pondered the dangerous power some private corporations have over freedom of expression.

“Today’s digital platforms offer opportunities for historically unprecedented amounts of speech, including speech from government actors,” he wrote. “But also unprecedented is the concentrated control over so much language in the hands of a few private parties. We will soon have no choice but to delve into applying our legal teachings to highly concentrated, privately owned information infrastructures such as digital platforms. “

No other judiciary followed suit, and Justice Thomas’ views on the First Amendment can be idiosyncratic. His opinion, however, reflected widespread frustration, particularly among conservatives, of letting private corporations decide what the public can read and see.

The Court of Appeal “feared that then President Trump would break off the speech by using the functions provided by Twitter,” wrote Justice Thomas. “But if the goal is to make sure the language isn’t stifled, the dominant digital platforms themselves must inevitably be the biggest concern.”