Categories
Politics

Biden urges finish to violence

President Joe Biden takes a break while speaking in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, United States on Monday, May 10, 2021.

Chris Kleponis | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Deadly violence between Israel and Palestinian militants in the Gaza Strip intensified Friday as President Joe Biden called for the worst fighting since 2014 to be de-escalated.

“Palestinians – including in Gaza – and Israelis alike deserve to live in dignity, security and security. No family should fear for their safety in their own home or in their place of worship,” the president said in a statement on Friday on the occasion of the Eid holiday and the end of Ramadan.

Israeli forces bombed and sent troops and tanks to the Gaza border after militants fired more rockets into Israeli cities.

At least 119 people, including 31 children, were killed, according to officials in Gaza. Eight people were killed in Israel, including a soldier and some civilians, in air and rocket strikes between the Israeli military and the Hamas militant group that governs the Gaza Strip.

It was the worst outbreak of violence between Israel and the Palestinians since the Gaza war in 2014.

“We think most of the children in these societies who are trauma from a conflict that is far beyond their control,” said Biden. The president added that he would continue to involve Palestinians, Israelis and other regional partners to address the situation.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki told a briefing Friday that the government was working to de-escalate the conflict. “We are watching this closely, we will remain closely committed,” she said. “Much of the conversations we have may be behind the scenes.”

“Israel has the right to self-defense,” continued Psaki. “We continue to focus on using every lever available to us to de-escalate the situation on the ground.” She added that US humanitarian aid to Palestinians will continue.

The dramatic escalation followed protests against the possible expulsion of Palestinian families from a neighborhood in East Jerusalem by the Israeli Supreme Court. In Jerusalem last Friday, Israeli security forces clashed with Palestinians’ thrown stones near the Al-Aqsa Mosque, Islam’s third holiest site, before a trial on Monday in the event of an eviction.

A picture shows the explosion after an Israeli strike against a building in Gaza City on May 14, 2021.

Mahmud Hams | AFP | Getty Images

As tensions increased, the Supreme Court delayed the hearing on the right-wing Israeli case. Monday was also the anniversary of the retaking of East Jerusalem by Israel in the 1967 war and the Muslim observance of Ramadan.

Israel said it would send troops to the Gaza border before a possible ground invasion of the area after four days of ongoing cross-border conflict. In addition to Hamas’ rocket strikes on Tel Aviv, Jerusalem and other cities and Israeli air strikes on Gaza, Jewish and Arab mobs clashed on the streets of several Israeli cities this week, resulting in dozens of arrests.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warned in a televised address that the escalating conflict had embroiled Israel in two fighting campaigns – in Gaza and in Israeli cities – and reiterated his promise to use armed forces to combat violence in the cities.

Streaks of light are seen as Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system intercepts missiles launched into Israel from the Gaza Strip, seen from Ashkelon, Israel, May 12, 2021.

Amir Cohen | Reuters

“I again urge the citizens of Israel not to take the law into their own hands. Anyone who does this will be severely punished,” said Netanyahu. “We will act with full force against enemies from outside and lawbreakers from within in order to restore calm in the state of Israel.”

Netanyahu also thanked Biden and other world leaders on Friday and vowed that Israel “will continue to crack down on Hamas”. “It’s not over yet,” he said. “We will do everything we can to restore the security of our city and our citizens.”

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

A ground invasion of Gaza has not yet been announced. Some world leaders and lawmakers have condemned the violence and called for de-escalation to avoid spiraling into all-out war.

Israeli President Reuven Rivlin pushed for “senseless civil war” amid urban unrest. UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres called for an “immediate de-escalation and cessation of hostilities” in the region.

“Too many innocent civilians have already died,” Guterres wrote in a tweet. “This conflict can only exacerbate radicalization and extremism across the region.”

The Palestinians are assessing the damage caused by Israeli air strikes on May 14, 2021 in Beit Hanun in the northern Gaza Strip.

Mahmud Hams | AFP | Getty Images

Senator Chris Murphy, D-Conn., Chairman of the Foreign Relations Subcommittee, has called for a ceasefire as soon as possible to prevent further civilian deaths.

“Ground operations will not stop the missiles falling on Israel or resolve the fundamental security challenges Israel is facing,” Murphy said in a statement Thursday. “Only a short-term ceasefire and a real path to a viable long-term future with two states can do this.”

Secretary of State Antony Blinken confirmed Wednesday that the US is sending the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Israel and Palestinian Affairs to urge Israelis and Palestinians to de-escalate the violence.

The U.S. State Department on Thursday also raised its travel advice for Israel, citing armed conflict and civil unrest and urging people not to travel to Gaza because of Covid-19 and conflict.

– Reuters and Associated Press contributed to the coverage

Israeli artillery soldiers gather near the Israeli-Gaza border on the Israeli side on May 14, 2021.

Amir Cohen | Reuters

Categories
Politics

What Would George Washington Look Like In the present day? A Pandemic Creation Attracts Consideration.

What would George Washington look like if he were a modern politician? This question came to George Aquilla Hardy, a musician, 14 months after the pandemic. There he was stuck in his nursery in Dorset, England at the age of 23 instead of playing music festivals.

With nowhere to be and tired of “looking at the same four walls,” said Mr. Hardy, he decided to use Photoshop to answer his question. This is the result he posted on Reddit on May 2nd:

Since then, he – and others – have posted and republished it thousands of times on virtually every social media platform. A lot of the comments are silly. But Mr. Hardy’s creation – which he mocked in about three hours – also piqued real interest in the question he started with: What would the first President of the United States look like if he lived in the era of online suit ordering would? and Instagram campaign ads?

It’s unlikely that a man so proud of what he wore would have chosen to be seen in such an inconspicuous suit, said Alexis Coe, a political historian and author of “You Never Forget Your First: A biography of George of Washington. ”

“He was pretty fancy,” she said. “I don’t think it would look as chic as Mitt Romney, but you could tell it was well tailored. If he couldn’t wear Prada, he’d probably have it made to measure. “

Dean Malissa, described as the “greatest George Washington impersonator in the world,” agreed that the first president was “a bit of a fashion sign.” He also tended to dress more formally than his colleagues. “When men of his day took off their coats when it was scorching hot, he kept his on,” said Mr. Malissa, a longtime Washington performer at Mount Vernon.

Mr. Hardy doesn’t know who designed the coat his George Washington wears, only that it was worn by Representative Roger Williams of Texas. He chose Mr. Williams as the base image for his Photoshop creation after searching for “US Politicians” online and scrolling a bit, he said. He then combined that image with photos of Glenn Close and Michael Douglas because an article about celebrities who look like historical figures convincingly convinced him they had a bit of Washington in them.

Ms. Coe, the political historian, said she hadn’t seen any of the 6-foot-2-inch Washington’s that are known to wear like an athlete on those narrow shoulders. Nor can she imagine a man who put so much effort into photographing Mr. Hardy’s creation. (No, George Washington did not wear a wig, contrary to what many believe.)

What exactly, she said, assuming time travel hasn’t somehow fixed this for him, is the tight-lipped smile. The founding father had terrible teeth. He wore walrus and hippopotamus ivory dentures, as well as slave teeth obtained from dentists who specialize in such things, she said. But even with the dentures he was conscious of opening his mouth.

As it turns out, Mr. Hardy wasn’t the only person who caused pandemic malaise to create a modern portrayal of the man who presided over the 1787 Constitutional Convention. Magdalene Visaggio, a comic book writer, posted this in January:

“I always had a hard time imagining George Washington as a person walking around saying things,” she explained, explaining why she’d done it using a cell phone face-swapping tool and a photo of President Biden.

Her primary objection to Mr. Hardy’s image was that Washington was only 67 when he died, but “he looks super old” in the Reddit portrait.

She also noted that while it is difficult to take photos of people who died before photography, it is difficult to find what is right. She recently began using the teachings of her own modern Washington to create a photograph of Julius Caesar.

Categories
Politics

Home GOP elects Elise Stefanik to exchange Liz Cheney as convention chair

Representative Elise Stefanik (R-NY) smiles after the House Republicans elected her to chair the conference on May 14, 2021 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC.

Almond Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

House Republicans voted Friday to make Rep. Elise Stefanik their conference chair, days after they called Rep. Liz Cheney for her opposition to former President Donald Trump’s continued influence on the party and her condemnation of his “big lie”, that the 2020 election had been rigged.

The Republicans met at around 8:30 a.m. ET at the Congress Visitor Center, the same room where they voted Cheney off the No. 3 position two days earlier.

The vote for Stefanik was carried out by secret ballot. The final balance was 134-46.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Stefanik, a fourth-term New York State Congresswoman, gained national attention and clout in her party in 2019 when she forcibly defended Trump during his first impeachment trial.

“My focus is on unity because the American people and our voters deserve it,” Stefanik told reporters after the vote.

She thanked Trump for approving her role over Cheney and called the former president “a critical part of our Republican team.”

Cheney was denounced within her party for refusing to blow up Trump for spreading unsubstantiated conspiracy theories about his loss of election to President Joe Biden.

While federal officials said there was no widespread electoral fraud and dozens of lawsuits by Trump’s allies did not reverse a state’s election results, Trump has nonetheless refused to concede Biden. The former president continues to falsely claim that he won the election and that it was “stolen” from him.

Cheney blames Trump directly for invading a group of his supporters on January 6th in the Capitol. She was one of only 10 Republicans to vote for inciting an uprising against Trump in the House, and since that vote she has continued to argue that if the Republican Party fails to condemn Trump, Trump is a threat to the country. Trump was acquitted in the Senate.

Trump “risks further violence,” said Cheney on the eve of the vote on the House floor to remove her leadership role. He “continues to undermine our democratic process and sow doubts as to whether democracy works at all,” she said.

Stefanik was endorsed by Trump and House Republican leaders Kevin McCarthy and Steve Scalise, both of whom pointed out that Cheney’s focus undermined the GOP’s goal of reclaiming the House in 2022.

While Stefan’s status as the front runner on Cheney’s job has never been questioned, some conservatives have complained that the less experienced congresswoman was not conservative enough for the job.

She faced a last-minute challenge from Texas MP Chip Roy, supported by MP Ken Buck, of Missouri, and has been criticized by some conservative groups.

“Elise Stefanik is NOT a good spokesperson for the House Republican Conference,” the conservative Club for Growth tweeted last week. “The Republicans in the House should find a Conservative to run the news and win back the majority of the House.

Categories
Politics

Spy Businesses Search New Afghan Allies as U.S. Withdraws

KABUL, Afghanistan – Western espionage agencies are evaluating and soliciting regional leaders outside the Afghan government who may be able to provide intelligence on terrorist threats long after US forces have withdrawn, according to current and former American, European and Afghan officials.

The effort marks a turning point in the war. Instead of one of the largest multinational military training missions of all time, informants and intelligence agencies are now being sought. Despite diplomats saying the Afghan government and its security forces will be able to hold their own, the move signals that Western intelligence agencies are focusing on the possible – or even probable – collapse of the central government and an inevitable return to civil war to prepare.

Court officials in Afghanistan recall the 1980s and 1990s when the country was controlled by the Soviets and then turned into a factional conflict between regional leaders. The West was often dependent on opposing warlords – and at times supported them financially through relationships that contradicted the Afghan people. As a result of these policies, the United States was often particularly indebted to brokers who had outrageously committed human rights abuses.

Candidates considered today for intelligence gathering include the son of Ahmad Shah Massoud, the famous Afghan fighter who led fighters against the Soviets in the 1980s and as head of the Northern Alliance against the Taliban for the following decade . The son – Ahmad Massoud, 32 – has tried in recent years to revive his father’s work by assembling a coalition of militias to defend northern Afghanistan.

Afghans, American and European officials say there is no formal cooperation between Mr Massoud and Western intelligence, although some have held preliminary meetings. While there is widespread agreement within the CIA and the French DGSE that it could provide information, opinions differ as to whether Mr Massoud, who has not been tested as a leader, would be able to command an effective resistance.

The appeal of developing relationships with Mr Massoud and other regional energy brokers is obvious: Western governments distrust the Taliban’s lukewarm commitments to keep terrorist groups out of the country in the years to come, and fear that if they don’t, the Afghan government could collapse Peace settlement is achieved. The Second Resistance, as Mr Massoud now calls his armed insurgent force, is a network that opposes the Taliban, Al-Qaeda or any extremist group that emerges from their shadow.

Senior CIA officials, including William J. Burns, the agency’s director, have confirmed that they will be looking for new ways to gather information in Afghanistan once American forces have withdrawn and that their ability to gather information about terrorist activity will increase collect is restricted.

But Mr Massoud’s organization is still in its infancy, desperate for support and legitimacy. It is supported by around a dozen militia commanders who have fought against the Taliban and the Soviets in the past, as well as several thousand fighters in the north. Mr Massoud says his ranks are occupied by those who have been insulted by the government and, like the Taliban, believes that Afghan President Ashraf Ghani has exceeded his greeting.

“We are ready, even if it takes my own life,” said Massoud in an interview.

Even the symbols at Mr. Massoud’s events are reminiscent of the time of the Civil War: old flags of the Northern Alliance and the old national anthem.

But despite all the excitement of Mr Massoud at the recent rallies and ceremonies, the idea that the Northern Alliance could be renamed and that its former leaders – some of whom have now become ambassadors, vice-presidents and senior military commanders in the Afghan government – would follow someone who is half his age and has little experience with war on the battlefield seems unrealistic right now, security analysts have said.

Supporting any kind of insurgency or building a resistance movement presents real challenges today, said Lisa Maddox, a former CIA analyst who has done extensive work on Afghanistan.

“The concern is what would the second resistance involve and what would our goals be?” She said. “I’m afraid people are proposing a new proxy war in Afghanistan. I think we learned that we can’t win. “

Even considering that an unproven militia leader for possible counter-terrorism assurances upon withdrawal of international forces is undermining the last two decades of state-building, security analysts say, practically turning the idea of ​​an impending civil war into an expected reality by further strengthening anti-government forces . Such divisions are widespread for exploitation by the Taliban.

The United States had a close relationship with the Northern Alliance, which made it difficult to gather information in the country. The French and British both supported high-ranking Massoud in the 1980s, while the Americans instead focused primarily on groups associated with Pakistani intelligence. CIA links with Mr. Massoud and his group were limited until 1996 when the agency began providing logistical assistance in exchange for information about al-Qaeda.

One of the reasons the CIA kept Massoud at bay was his track record of unreliability, drug trafficking, and war atrocities in the early 1990s, when Mr. Massoud’s forces shot at Kabul and massacred civilians as other warlords did.

Now different allied governments and officials have different views on Mr. Massoud and the viability of his movement. The French, who were devoted supporters of his father, see his efforts as promising to put up real resistance to the control of the Taliban.

David Martinon, the French ambassador in Kabul, said he had been watching Mr Massoud closely for the past three years and nominated him for a trip to Paris to meet with French leaders, including the president. “He’s smart, passionate, and a man of integrity who is dedicated to his country,” said Martinon.

Washington is more divided, and some government analysts do not believe Mr Massoud would be able to build an effective coalition.

Eighteen months ago, Lisa Curtis, then a National Security Council official, met with Mr. Massoud, along with Zalmay Khalilzad, the leading US diplomat who led peace efforts with the Taliban. She described him as charismatic and said he spoke convincingly about the importance of democratic values. “He’s very clear and talks about the importance of maintaining the progress made over the past 20 years,” she said.

In Afghanistan, some are more skeptical of Mr Massoud’s power to influence a resistance.

“Practical experience has shown that no one can be like his father,” said Lieutenant General Mirza Mohammad Yarmand, a former deputy minister in the Ministry of the Interior. “His son lives in a different time and does not have the experience that his father matured.”

Other members of the Afghan government see Mr. Massoud as a nuisance, someone who has the potential to create problems for his own interests in the future.

While opinions differ on his organizational skills, there is broad consensus that Mr Massoud can help act as eyes and ears for the West – as his father did 20 years ago.

Mr Massoud, who was trained at the Royal Military College, Sandhurst, UK, returned to Afghanistan in 2016. He spent the next three years quietly building support before becoming more public in 2019 through rallies and recruiting campaigns across the north.

In recent months, Mr Massoud’s rhetoric has grown tougher when he recently attacked Mr Ghani during a ceremony in Kabul and his efforts to secure international support became more aggressive. Not only has Mr. Massoud reached the US, UK and France, but also courted India, Iran and Russia, according to people familiar with his activities. Afghan intelligence documents show that Mr Massoud is buying weapons from Russia through an intermediary.

But Europe and the United States see him less as a bulwark against a rising Taliban than as a potentially important observer of al-Qaeda and the Islamic State. A generation ago, Mr. Massoud’s father was open about the burgeoning terrorist threats in the country. And even if the son cannot command the same armed forces as his father, he may be able to issue similar warnings.

As a young diplomat, Mr Martinon recalls Massoud’s late warning to the world during his visit to France in April 2001.

“What he said was caution, caution,” recalled Mr. Martinon. “The Taliban are hosting Al-Qaeda and preparing something.”

Julian E. Barnes reported from Washington. Najim Rahim and Fatima Faizi reported from Kabul.

Categories
Politics

Matt Gaetz pal Joel Greenberg will plead responsible in intercourse case

Joel Greenberg, a friend of Rep. Matt Gaetz, has agreed to plead guilty to a criminal case related to the investigation of the Republican lawmaker and Trump’s ally into sexual trafficking, court records show.

Greenberg is due to appear in federal court in Orlando, Florida Monday morning to change the hearing.

Greenberg, a Florida tax collector, has been charged with underage sex trafficking, stalking, cable fraud, and identity theft, among other charges. He pleaded not guilty to these charges, but his attorney and prosecutor told a judge at a hearing last month that Greenberg was expected to close a plea deal.

Greenberg’s lawyer Fritz Scheller told reporters after the hearing: “I’m sure Matt Gaetz is not feeling very well today.”

Scheller later said, “You’ve seen the number of stories out there and the focus is on their relationship. Isn’t it obvious to assume he’d be concerned?”

Gaetz, who represents Florida’s first congressional district in the panhandle, has denied any wrongdoing and has not been charged with criminal charges.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Harlan Hill, a spokesman for Gaetz, said in a statement: “The first indictment against Joel Greenberg alleged that he falsely accused another man of having sex with a minor. That man was apparently innocent. So was Congressman Gaetz.”

Categories
Politics

Republicans Rewrite Historical past of the Capitol Riot, Hampering an Inquiry

WASHINGTON – Four months after supporters of President Donald J. Trump stormed the Capitol in a deadly riot, an increasing number of Republicans in Congress are making great efforts to rewrite the January 6th story, downplaying or downplaying the violence denial and distraction to investigate it.

Their denialism, which has been intensifying for weeks, and which was vividly demonstrated at two congressional hearings this week, is one reason lawmakers have been unable to agree on the formation of an independent commission to review the attack on the Capitol. Republicans have insisted that any investigation include an investigation into violence by Antifa, a loose collective of anti-fascist activists, and Black Lives Matter. It also reflects an embrace of misinformation that has become a trademark of the Republican Party in the age of Mr Trump.

“A refusal to establish the truth is what we have to deal with,” said spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi on Wednesday. “We have to find the truth and we hope to do so in the most bipartisan way possible.”

It made a direct link between the overthrow of Wyoming Republican Representative Liz Cheney as her number 3 – a move that arose from Ms. Cheney’s vociferous rejection of Mr. Trump’s election lies that inspired the uproar – and her refusal to acknowledge them Reality of what happened on January 6th.

A House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing on the insurrection on Wednesday underscored the Republican strategy. Arizona Representative Andy Biggs, chairman of the right-wing House Freedom Caucus, used his time to show a video of mob violence allegedly by Antifa that took place in Portland, Ore, 2,800 miles away.

His member of Freedom Caucus, representative Ralph Norman from South Carolina, asked whether the rioters involved in the attack on the Capitol were actually Trump supporters – despite their Trump shirts, hats and flags, the “Make America Great Again” paraphernalia “And the professional’s trump chants and social media posts.

“I don’t know who took the poll to say they were Trump supporters,” said Norman.

Another Republican, Georgia Representative Andrew Clyde, described the scene during the attack – which injured almost 140 – as a “normal tourist visit” to the Capitol.

“Let’s face it with the American people: it wasn’t a riot,” said Clyde, adding that the floor of the house was never breached and that no firearms had been confiscated. “There was an undisciplined mob. There have been some rioters and some who have committed vandalism. “

He then asked Jeffrey A. Rosen, who was the acting attorney general at the time of the attack, whether he viewed it as a “riot or riot with vandalism similar to last summer,” apparently referring to protests against the racial justice system that swept over the country Country.

Immediately after the attack, many Republicans joined the Democrats in condemning the forcible takeover of the building known as the Citadel of American Democracy. But in the weeks that followed, Mr Trump, backed by right-wing news outlets and some members of Congress, expressed the fiction that it had been carried out by Antifa and Black Lives Matter, an allegation that federal authorities had repeatedly debunked. Now a much broader group of Republican lawmakers have agreed on more subtle efforts to tarnish and distort what happened.

The approach has hampered the creation of an independent commission, modeled on the one that dealt with the September 11, 2001, attacks to investigate the Capitol uprising, its roots and the government’s response. Ms. Pelosi said discussions stalled as Republicans insisted on including unrelated groups and events, and that Democrats may be forced to conduct their own investigation through existing committees of the House if the GOP doesn’t drop demand would.

“Now we get this outrageous Orwellian revisionist story where Donald Trump says his most loyal followers walked in – literally he said he hugged and kissed the Capitol officers,” said Representative Jamie Raskin, Democrat of Maryland. “My colleagues should stop all the evasive maneuvers, distractions and distractions. Let’s find out what happened to us that day. “

Republicans involved in efforts to divert attention from the January 6 attack are merely arguing that they are pointing to the hypocrisy of the Democrats in investigating supporters of the former president, but not those in favor of movements on the left Orient the page. The subject was the focus of Ms. Cheney’s fall this week.

Representative Kevin McCarthy of California, the top Republican in the House of Representatives, has insisted that the commission investigate the violence of the left, while Ms. Cheney publicly undercut him, arguing that they are closely focused on the January 6th events should.

“This kind of intense, narrow focus threatens people in my party who may have played roles they shouldn’t have,” Ms. Cheney said in an interview that aired on NBC Thursday.

Ms. Cheney may be referring to the fact that some Republicans were actively promoting Mr. Trump’s lie that his election had been stolen, urging their supporters to come to Washington on January 6 for a defiant final stand to address him to keep the power. Legislators linked guns to the organizers of the so-called Stop the Steal protest that preceded the uprising and used inflammatory language to describe the operations.

Republicans are also deeply concerned that an independent investigation will target their party negatively in the upcoming 2022 midterm elections. And many Republicans say they listen to their voters who want them to continue to stand with Mr. Trump and reject Mr. Biden’s victory as illegitimate.

Representative Adam Kinzinger, Republican of Illinois and a supporter of Ms. Cheney, said some sort of circular logic has taken hold of his party where Mr Trump makes false statements, his supporters believe them, and then Republican lawmakers who need support from those voters who are to be re-elected, they repeat.

“The reality is that you can’t blame people for believing the election was stolen because that’s all they hear from their leaders,” said Kinzinger. “It’s the job of executives to tell the truth even when it’s awkward, and we don’t.”

Instead, Republicans portray themselves and their supporters as victims of a Democratic plan to silence them for their beliefs.

Arizona Representative Paul Gosar, a leading Congressional proponent of the Stop the Steal movement, used his time at the hearing earlier this week to accuse the Justice Department of “molesting peaceful patriots across the country.”

“Open propaganda and lies are used to unleash the national security state against law-abiding US citizens, especially Trump voters,” he said.

Republican Jody B. Hice, Republican of Georgia, identified Trump loyalists as the real victims of the January 6 attack.

“It was Trump supporters who lost their lives that day,” he said, “not Trump supporters who took the lives of others.”

Nicholas Fandos contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

U.S. Marine Main Warnagiris arrested for position in Trump mob

A still from a video released by the DOJ showing Christopher Warnagiris (circled in red), a Marine Corps officer stationed at Marine Corps Base Quantico, was arrested today in Virginia and charged with crimes related to violating the U.S. Capitol indicted January 6th.

Source: DOJ

A U.S. Navy officer on active duty was arrested Thursday and charged with violence against the police by a group of supporters of then-President Donald Trump during the January 6 invasion of the U.S. Capitol.

Major Christopher Warnagiris, 40, is accused of pushing past a line of police guarding the Capitol and pushing through a door in the Capitol’s east rotunda.

Warnagiris, a Woodbridge, Virginia resident stationed at Marine Corp Base Quantico, is being tried in federal court of aggression, resistance, or obstruction of certain officials, obstruction of law enforcement, obstruction of Congress, forcible entry into the Capitol Grounds and charged with entering or staying in a restricted building without legitimate authority.

He will appear in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on Thursday afternoon.

A still from a video released by the DOJ showing Christopher Warnagiris (circled in red), a Marine Corps officer stationed at Marine Corps Base Quantico, was arrested today in Virginia and charged with crimes related to violating the U.S. Capitol indicted January 6th.

Source: DOJ

Court documents say that Warnagiris, after forcibly entering the Capitol, positioned himself in the corner of the door and propped up the door with his body and pulled other rioters inside.

Video surveillance footage shows Warnagiris bumping into a police officer who was trying to close the door, according to a criminal complaint.

The Pentagon had no immediate comment on the arrest, which took place in Virginia on Thursday morning.

Warnagiris was identified by a member of the public on March 16 after the person complained about seeing three photos of a man entering the Capitol.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

This witness recognized Warnagiris after working with him for about six months in 2019, the complaint read.

A second witness, “who has worked with Warnagiris for about nine months and sees him in close proximity several times a week,” identified him in the same photos that the first witness had seen according to the indictment.

In 2017, according to a news article, Warnagiris acted as the chief of operations for a landing force of US Marines and Navy sailors who were stationed on the French Navy’s LHD Tonnere amphibious assault ship during a two-month deployment in the area of ​​operations of the US 5th Fleet. Website.

U.S. Navy Maj. Christopher Warnagiris (R) interacts with a French naval officer during the embarkation of the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit aboard the French amphibious assault ship LHD Tonnerre (L9014).

Photo: Sgt. Jessica Lucio | DVIDS

About 440 people were arrested at the Capitol for the January 6 riot that began after Trump urged crowds to march there at a rally outside the White House.

The invasion of the Capitol complex disrupted a joint congressional session held that day to confirm President Joe Biden’s victory at the electoral college.

Trump falsely claimed for weeks after the presidential election in November that he had won the White House race and that Biden’s victory was the result of widespread electoral fraud.

– CNBCs Amanda Macias contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

White Home Is Mentioned to Quietly Push Change to D.C. Statehood Invoice

WASHINGTON – The Biden administration has tacitly reached out to Congressional Democrats for a possible change in their high-profile but long-term efforts to transform most of the District of Columbia into the country’s 51st state, according to Congressional and Legislative officials.

The bill, which passed last month but has great prospects in the Senate, would allow the District of Columbia’s residential and commercial zones as a new state, leaving a rump enclave that includes the seat of government, including the Capitol. White House, Supreme Court, other federal buildings and monuments.

The deliberations are focused on the 23rd amendment to the Constitution, which gives the seat of government three electoral college votes in presidential elections. If it is not repealed after a statehood, the bill would try to block the appointment of the three presidential voters. But the government reportedly suggested giving them to the referendum winner instead.

Officials familiar with the discussion, speaking on condition of anonymity, cited the political delicacy of the matter at a time when Republicans were raising legal and political objections to statehood for the District of Columbia’s 700,000 residents. Such a move would create two extra seats in the Senate, which the Democrats would most likely win, and give the only representative in the house a vote.

A White House attorney, however, acknowledging cross-industry dialogue between Democrats, said: “The approval of DC as a state is in the power of Congress – arguments to the contrary are unfounded. But we also believe that there are ways to address the concerns raised, so we’re working with Congress to make the bill as strong as possible. “

In late April, the White House approved the statehood law in a policy statement. However, one overlooked line also suggested that part of the legislation known as HR 51 had given President Biden’s legal team a break.

“The government looks forward to working with Congress as HR 51 goes through the legislative process to ensure that it is consistent with Congress’s constitutional responsibility and power to legislate new states into the Union,” she said.

Should political conditions ever change so much that one day the Senate approves statehood for the District of Columbia, which would be the smallest state by area, though its population exceeds Vermont and Wyoming, Republican-controlled states are generally expected to: that they question its constitutionality.

The Supreme Court could dismiss such a case on the grounds that it raises the kind of issue that the politically elected branches must decide. In 1875 she turned down a case in which the retrocession of a former portion of the district to Virginia from 1845 was challenged in part because of such logic. However, if the judges achieved the legal merit, they would face several new issues.

Democrats generally agree that two legal objections have been raised by Republicans to the bill – that Maryland may need to approve statehood because the land was in that state’s jurisdiction prior to 1790, and that it could be unconstitutional, the size of the federal Enclave ownership downsizing the seat of government – are less serious threats. They do not see these arguments as being supported by the explicit text of the relevant parts of the Constitution.

But how best to navigate the 23rd Amendment if it’s not lifted gave the administration’s legal team a bigger break, officials said. The amendment says that the seat of the federal government should “appoint” three presidential elections.

It is not clear how many, if any, potential voters would be left there. The only place of residence in the Rumpf federal enclave would be the White House; Presidential families traditionally vote in their home states, but nothing forces them to. Theoretically, homeless people could also claim a residence in the planned enclave.

As a fallback, if the change is not swiftly repealed, the statehood law would make two changes to the law: legal residents of the enclave – if any – could vote in their former states by postal vote, and legal process for the nomination of voters would do be repealed.

However, one opponent of the bill, Roger Pilon, a former Reagan administration official and legal scholar at the Cato Libertarian Institute, argued that this mechanism would not work. Congress, he said in a prepared testimony from the House earlier this year, could not use a law to overturn a constitutional directive or to lose people’s constitutional rights.

Democrats discuss changing the bill to use a different mechanism. Rather than trying to block the nomination of voters for the federal seat, Congress would pass law that determines them in a specific way. (The 23rd amendment says that the federal seat presidential election should be “appointed in a manner that Congress can instruct”.)

One way is to add these three votes to the total number of candidates who otherwise won the electoral college. Another option is to give them to the winner of the national referendum, which, if the election is very close, could change the outcome.

It is unclear whether such a change would reflect legal concerns or whether it is a smarter political approach.

Politically, handing voters over to the referendum winner could encourage Republican-controlled state lawmakers to work together to swiftly repeal the amendment rather than hampering partisan efforts: Republican presidential candidates have won that twice since 2000 Electoral college despite the loss of the referendum.

The idea of ​​the referendum was proposed last year by Columbia University’s two law professors, Jessica Bulman-Pozen and Olatunde Johnson.

Bulman-Pozen, who served in the Justice Department’s legal department during the Obama administration, said she believed that the Supreme Court believed the existing law was constitutional but she disagreed that it is as “elegant” as giving these votes to the winner of the referendum.

“I don’t think it fits the text best,” she said of the bill’s current approach, adding, “Congress has other options to consider – even if it is on repealing the 23rd Amendment hopes. “

But Mr Pilon was also skeptical of the proposed revision, arguing that it would undermine the spirit of the 23rd Amendment.

“The whole business is an extraordinarily complicated effort to get around the fact” that the District of Columbia “was never seen as the source of any future state,” he said.

The considerations take place against the background of the growing – but incomplete – support of the Democratic Party for statehood. Proponents seek to bolster that support to lay the groundwork for the bill to be passed when conditions change.

“I am actively working with my Democratic and Republican colleagues to stand up for DC statehood because this is not a partisan issue, but a question of basic fairness and equal representation of all citizens,” said Senator Thomas R. Carper, a Democrat Delaware who picked up the coat for the Senate cause.

A major obstacle is the Senate’s filibuster rule; It would take 10 Republicans and all 50 Democrats to overcome this. Although the bill has a record number of Democratic co-sponsors, including New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen this week, four lawmakers have not signed up, according to Carper’s office. These four include Senator Kyrsten Sinema from Arizona, who sits on the equally divided committee responsible for law enforcement.

Another, Senator Joe Manchin III, a Democrat of West Virginia, recently told a radio broadcast that he believed a constitutional amendment was needed to allow the District of Columbia as a state. He cited the history of the debate over ways to fully represent residents, including the comments of some prominent Democratic legal officials in the 1960s and 1970s.

However, other Democrats have indicated that the context of these historical commentaries has centered on proposals that differed from the idea of ​​this era.

On the day of Mr Manchin’s remarks, a delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton, the non-voting district representative and main sponsor of the bill in the House of Representatives, issued a statement refuting the idea that an amendment to the constitution was necessary. As part of that argument, she addressed the alternative approach that the Biden team has privately called for.

“Congress could, for example, choose to assign voters to the electoral college winner or to the national referendum to prevent the reduced federal district from controlling the votes,” she said.

Categories
Politics

Biden says count on excellent news in subsequent 24 hours

UPDATE, 5:15 p.m. ET: Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm just announced that the Colonial Pipeline is resuming gas pipeline operations.

WASHINGTON – President Joe Biden said Wednesday he was expecting good news “in the next 24 hours” of the ongoing cyber attack on the Colonial Pipeline that has been hampering fuel deliveries to the east coast in recent days.

“We have been in very close contact with Colonial Pipeline, the area you are talking about – one of the reasons gasoline prices are rising,” Biden said at an event on Wednesday afternoon.

“I think you will be hearing good news in the next 24 hours. And I think we will get this under control.”

The remarks came as Americans in the southeast and mid-Atlantic faced pump fuel shortages from late Monday, which showed little sign of deterioration until Wednesday afternoon. Panic buying in some states exacerbated supply chain problems.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

“I’ve meanwhile made it easier for us to lift some of the restrictions on the transportation of fuel, as well as access to the US military that provides fuel, and vehicles to get it there, places where it’s badly needed becomes.” “said Biden.

The Biden administration’s recent moves, according to the White House, represent a large-scale mobilization of the government to respond to the crisis that began when Colonial informed federal authorities on Friday that it had been the target of a ransomware attack .

The government said Tuesday it would initiate a “comprehensive federal response” to restore and secure US energy supply chains.

The attack forced the company to shut down approximately 5,500 miles of pipeline, cutting off nearly half of the fuel supply on the country’s east coast.

The attack on Colonial Pipeline was traced back to a hacking group called DarkSide, an organized group of hackers set up on the ransomware as a service business model. This means that the DarkSide hackers develop, market and sell ransomware hacking tools to other criminals who then carry out attacks.

DarkSide is believed to operate out of Russia, but the White House has said there is no evidence to date that the attack was state sponsored or directed by the Kremlin.

The question that remains open is how Colonial Pipeline is solving the attack, including whether Colonial paid the ransom that hackers typically demand in these scenarios.

White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Wednesday refused to answer specific questions about the collaboration between Colonial Pipeline and the Biden administration, but said the company and relevant authorities are working closely together.

The Department of Energy leads the federal government’s response in coordination with the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security, and the Department of Defense. A FireEye Mandiant spokeswoman confirmed to CNBC that the US cybersecurity company is working with Colonial Pipeline following the incident.

The national average for a gallon of unleaded gasoline rose to $ 2.985 on Tuesday, up 6 cents over the past week, according to the AAA.

However, regionally, the price increases were sharper, noted AAA. In South Carolina, for example, gasoline prices have increased more than 6 cents since Monday and 13 cents last week. In Georgia, drivers paid $ 2.87 a gallon on Tuesday, an increase of more than 10 cents in just one day and 17 cents a week.

An increase of 3 cents per gallon would bring the average US sales price to its highest level since November 2014.

“We are currently seeing full-fledged panic in a few places that I suspected we could see,” said Tom Kloza, head of global energy analysis at OPIS. “There aren’t enough drivers to get trucks from terminals filled with gasoline to gas stations. We see a lot of gas stations running out. Georgia appears to be Ground Zero.”

Kloza said he expected gasoline prices to rise, but not to spike. The bigger problem is that gasoline will be scarce in the area as it will take some time to replace once the pipeline is turned on and the outages could continue.

Gasoline in the pipeline travels at only 5 miles per hour.

CNBC’s Eamon Javers, Amanda Macias and Patti Domm contributed to the coverage.

This is the latest news. Please try again.