Categories
Politics

Air Drive Tries Digital Actuality to Stem Suicide and Sexual Assault

MCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE, N.J. — The three airmen sat quietly adjusting their headsets, murmuring to their colleague, who was in distinct trouble. “Everyone goes through rough patches sometimes,” each said, a few moments apart, to the same despondent and mildly intoxicated man, whose wife recently left him and who seemed immersed in suicidal thoughts.

The airman on the other end of the headsets was virtual, but the conversation was all encompassing, a 30-minute, occasionally harrowing journey among three actual airmen and a virtual actor, whom they each tried to coax into getting help.

The three were trying out a new virtual reality program this month that the Air Force is using to target two problems that continue to vex military leaders: suicide and sexual assault within the ranks. Years of prevention training — often in the form of somnolence-inducing PowerPoint presentations — have done little to stem the rates of either problem.

Whether the virtual reality model can ultimately do better remains an open question. But military officials are encouraged by the early self-reported responses to the training.

Over 1,000 Air Force personnel have participated in the training so far; 97 percent of those who tried it would recommend it, and trainees reported an increase in the likelihood to intervene with a person in crisis, Air Force officials said. And among those ages 18 to 25 — a generation more used to interactive virtual experiences that makes up the bulk of new recruits — the impact increased sevenfold. Officials intend to train at least 10,000 airmen with the program this year.

The training is meant to take on problems that, if anything, have worsened in the military in recent years. Between 2014 and 2019, the suicide rate for all active-duty troops increased from 20.4 to 25.9 suicides per 100,000 according to Pentagon data; in the last three months of 2020, suicides among National Guard troops nearly tripled to 39 from 14 over the same period the prior year.

In 2019, the Defense Department found that there were 7,825 reports of sexual assault involving service members as victims, a 3 percent increase from 2018.

The Army recently reprimanded 12 soldiers in an Illinois-based Army Reserve unit and took disciplinary actions against two senior leaders for mishandling sexual assault complaints, with investigators noting that leaders lacked “basic knowledge and understanding regarding core tenets” of the Army’s sexual assault prevention program.

One of the few effective tactics for both problems, experts say, is intervention by bystanders. They may witness harassment in a bar, for instance, or increasingly alarming messages on social media representing a suicide threat.

In the military, intervening, especially against someone of a higher rank, can be culturally difficult, especially for younger recruits. “Barriers sometimes get in the way from people intervening,” said Carmen Schott, the sexual assault prevention and response program manager for the Air Force’s Air Mobility Command. “If someone is higher rank, you might be more timid to say something. The Air Force has put a lot of effort into making clear nothing negative will happen if you intervene.”

The aim of the virtual reality program is to act out scenarios with airmen in simulated environments. The technology allows the airmen to select from cues at the bottom of the screen to have an interactive “conversation” with a photo-realistic virtual actor, one whose facial expressions and reactions are meant to make the training more effective.

In this behavioral rehearsal, airmen learn what may be useful to say, such as asking their buddy if he has a gun in his house, and why some other responses — like “man up” — are not helpful. Participants get feedback on their “empathy” score and tips on how to improve in future encounters.

“Virtual reality training puts the user in a scenario, not in a classroom where you are zoning out and on your cellphone,” Ms. Schott explained. “You are an active participant. You have to be ready. I think that it is going to help airmen retain and remember knowledge. We don’t want people to feel judged. They may not make perfect decisions, but they will learn skills.”

Kevin Cornish, the chief executive of Moth+Flame, a virtual reality learning firm in Brooklyn, looked a little like an interloper on the Air Force base here, a casually dressed artist among uniforms. Mr. Cornish, who was working on Taylor Swift music videos when he became entranced by the immersive experience of a 360-degree camera used in one of them, said that there was “something so invigorating about somebody making eye contact and talking to you.”

He said he was increasingly seeing companies turn to virtual reality to simulate difficult work conversations and game out scenarios, especially around diversity and inclusion.

As the airmen took turns interacting with their suicidal virtual colleague via their headsets, some spoke quietly and a bit awkwardly, while others sounded like stage actors as they tried to persuade their fellow airman to hand over his gun and go with them to see a supervisor. Sometimes they would nod as they listened, or lower their voices or wipe a tear.

“I loved that it was hands-on,” said Annette Hartman, 23, a senior airman. “It was better than sitting through a briefing and waiting to sign off on a roster. Some of the responses I wouldn’t have thought to say, like, ‘Have you thought about suicide? Do you have a gun?’”

That type of experience is set to expand: Another bystander program, which will roll out in July, will place the users in a bar, watching a scene of sexual harassment unfold.

“In an immersive experience, you get much closer to the feelings of a real story than you do with a computer screen,” said Nonny de la Peña, the chief executive of Emblematic Group and an early creator of virtual reality experiences. “We are starting to see that our world is not flat, and learning and experiencing and connecting is not going to be flat much longer.”

Categories
Politics

AT&T employed ally of Commerce Secretary Raimondo to foyer Biden infrastructure plan

John Stankey, CEO of AT&T

Mike Segar | Reuters

Telecom giant AT&T hired an ally of Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo to lobby officials over President Joe Biden’s infrastructure plan.

A lobbying registration report shows that AT&T hired Jon Duffy, the president of Rhode Island-based marketing firm Duffy & Shanley, in April. The document doesn’t say whether he will lobby congressional lawmakers or administration officials.

Duffy was a co-chair of Raimondo’s transition team after she was first elected in 2014 to be governor of Rhode Island. Records show that Duffy had never registered to lobby until his recent agreement with AT&T.

The lobbying report says that AT&T hired Duffy to focus on “issues related to broadband and The American Jobs Plan.”

Biden’s $2 trillion infrastructure proposal includes a $100 billion investment in expanding broadband access. The Senate Republicans’ most recent counteroffer included $65 billion for broadband.

The infrastructure lobbying comes during a pivotal time for AT&T. The company announced a $43 billion deal this month to merge its WarnerMedia division with Discovery.

AT&T so far in 2021 has spent just over $2.6 million on lobbying expenditures, according to the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics. AT&T lobbyists have engaged with the Commerce Department, the Executive Office of the President and the Vice President’s Office, among other agencies.

In response to questions about the Duffy hire, AT&T told CNBC on Friday that it plans to focus lobbying efforts in part on working toward “accessible, affordable and sustainable broadband connectivity.”

“During the pandemic, U.S. networks performed much better than other countries,” a company spokesman said. “The country’s broadband networks rose to the challenge due to policies that promoted private sector investment in multiple technologies and networks. Americans are paying less and getting more.”  

Duffy’s public relations company already lists AT&T as a client on its website. Other corporate clients listed include Intel, Dunkin’ Donuts, Hallmark and Staples. Duffy did not respond to a request for comment.

AT&T announced in April a $2 billion commitment to help make broadband more affordable.

Raimondo has been a fierce advocate for investments into expanding broadband access.

“We need transformational investments in broadband to ensure that all Americans finally have access to affordable, reliable, high-speed Internet service. During the pandemic we have seen that high-speed broadband service is not a luxury, but a necessity for jobs, education, and health care,” Raimondo said at an April hearing in front of the Senate Committee on Appropriations.

The Commerce Department’s National Telecommunications and Information Administration announced earlier this month a $288 million grant program for wide-scale broadband infrastructure.

Categories
Politics

Foster Friess, Huge Donor to Republicans, Dies at 81

Foster Friess, a Wyoming businessman who started an investment firm, made a fortune, and gave much of it to Republican presidential candidates and charities, sometimes with flair, died Thursday in Scottsdale, Arizona. He was 81 years old.

His organization, Foster’s Outriders, which confirmed the death, said he had been treated at the Mayo Clinic there for myelodysplastic syndrome, a disorder of blood cells and bone marrow.

Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon, who defeated Mr. Friess in Republican Governor’s Elementary School in 2018 and wrote on Twitter, described Mr. Friess as “a strong and consistent voice for Republican and Christian values.”

Mr. Friess’ election as governor was his only attempt in an important elected office. In politics he was best known for his donations, particularly for the presidential offers from Rick Santorum, the former United States Senator from Pennsylvania, in the 2012 and 2016 campaigns. After Mr. Santorum left the 2016 race, Mr. Friess was one of the first Republican megadonors to hug Donald J. Trump.

For many, the main support that Mr. Friess, a Protestant Christian, and his wife Lynnette gave was charities. Foster’s Outriders and the Lynn and Foster Friess Family Foundation have given grants, funded work for the homeless, supported water projects in Africa, and much more. His organization said Mr. Friess donated $ 500 million in his lifetime.

His 70th birthday party in 2010 in Jackson Hole, Wyo., Where he lived for much of the year, was legendary. The website wyofile.com described it.

“In the invitations to the party, Friess, a born again Christian, asked guests to identify their favorite charity, which reflected the values ​​of his favorite Galatian quote: ‘Bear each other’s burdens and in this way you will fulfill the law of Christ “wrote it in 2011.” He vowed to give $ 70,000 to the most worthy candidate. “

When the time came to announce the winner, the waiters at the Four Seasons Resort where the party was taking place distributed envelopes to guests.

“Friess asked the lucky winner to stand up and scream and leave the other guests,” the report continued. “Then he leaned back and waited for the chaos.”

When people opened the envelopes, someone was standing at each table shouting, “I won!” He had funded each request at a cost of $ 7.7 million.

Foster Stephen Friess was born on April 2, 1940 in Rice Lake, Wisconsin. His father Albert was a cattle breeder and his mother Ethel (Foster) Friess was a housewife.

“I came out of nowhere,” he told the New York Times in 2018 during his campaign for the governor when asked if he could be seen as one of the “elites” he railed against. “My mother dropped out of school in eighth grade to pick cotton and save the family farm. My father had a high school education. “

He graduated from the University of Wisconsin at Madison with a degree in business administration and served in the Army as an intelligence officer for a guided missile brigade at Fort Bliss, Texas.

After working in finance for several years, he founded the investment management company Friess Associates in 1974 and was soon recognized as a top stock picker. Its flagship product, the Brandywine Fund, rose to over $ 15 billion. In 2001 he sold a majority stake in Friess Associates to the Affiliated Managers Group.

On the political side, Mr. Friess supported more than just candidates. In 2010 he was a founding investor in the conservative news and opinion website of The Daily Caller, Tucker Carlson and Neil Patel.

In 2012, Mr Friess supported Mr Santorum not so much because he agreed to all of his policies – “I’m trying to dissuade him,” he told Lou Dobbs in February 2012 – but because he thought the Republican Party needed a new one Face.

“These old veteran warhorses are having a hard time making it,” he said on Lou Dobbs Tonight. “Dole couldn’t do it, McCain couldn’t do it. On the Democratic side, Gore couldn’t do it, and Kerry couldn’t do it. So the Democrats bring these fresh faces, they bring Carter out of nowhere, they bring Clinton out of nowhere, they bring Obama out of nowhere. “

Later that month, Mr. Friess made headlines when Andrea Mitchell asked him on MSNBC whether Mr. Santorum’s statements about “the dangers of contraception” would harm his campaign.

“Back then,” said Friess, “they used Bayer aspirin for contraception. The girls put it between their knees and it wasn’t that expensive. “

Mr Santorum’s main campaign started strong but failed, and Mr Obama was elected to a second term, defeating Mitt Romney.

In the next presidential campaign, Mr. Friess initially also supported Mr. Santorum. In mid-2015, when the Republican field was overflowing with candidates and meanness increased, he urged candidates “not to deviate from the reservation of courtesy”.

In May 2016, after Mr Santorum was out of the running and Mr Trump secured the Republican nomination, Mr Friess backed the Trump cause but admitted that Mr Trump had made progress by showing the incivility he condemned had – something he expected would turn into a tenor of the President.

“Donald’s strategy seems to be working,” Friess told CNN earlier this month, “but I’m convinced it will change.”

Mr. Friess supported Mr. Trump throughout his tenure, and when he ran for governor, the Trump family tried to return the favor – the President’s son, Donald Jr., confirmed him in an opinion piece in the Star Tribune of Casper, Wyo . President Trump himself was quieter, despite offering a Twitter post late in the campaign in which he supported Mr. Friess. Mr Gordon’s victory was cited by some as evidence of Mr Trump’s vulnerability, while others viewed it as a more local issue.

Three weeks ago, when Darin Smith, a lawyer and businessman who claimed that Mr. Trump “likely” won the 2020 election, announced that he was challenging Rep, Liz Cheney, Republican of Wyoming, who has criticized Mr. Trump In the 2022 primaries, he said Mr. Friess would be his campaign chairman.

The 58-year-old wife of Mr. Friess, Lynnette Estes Friess, survived him as did her four children Traci, Stephen, Carrie and Michael. a brother, Herman; and 15 grandchildren.

Categories
Politics

Texas Gov. Abbott defends resolution to finish Covid unemployment enhance

Texas governor Greg Abbott on Friday defended his decision to end the state’s unemployment surge after thousands of people signed a petition urging the Republican official to reverse his step.

“We have the demand for a workforce that people can return to work and the numbers in our state are safe enough for people to return to work,” Abbott said on CNBC’s Squawk on the Street.

“It’s time for America to get back to work,” said the Republican governor.

Abbott announced earlier this month that effective June 26, the state would reject the federally signed federal unemployment assistance programs in an effort to ease the economic burden of the Covid-19 pandemic.

These programs included a weekly $ 300 supplement to state unemployment benefits. At least 23 states have restricted use of federal unemployment programs.

Abbott said he had “the math behind this reasoning”.

“We have more vacancies than people in unemployment insurance, according to the Texas Workforce Commission. In addition, 18% of jobless claims submitted have been found to be fraudulent,” Abbott said.

A majority of Americans support the state’s efforts to end the rise in unemployment at the federal level, a recent Quinnipiac University poll found.

In Texas, the decision has caused some setbacks among those who say stopping the extra help will cause more pain to those already suffering. A petition asking Abbott to reverse his move has received approximately 8,000 signatures.

Abbott said Friday that ending the federal boost was critical to opening the state fully.

“The biggest challenge I hear from employers is that Texas is 100% open, employers are trying to hire, but restaurants and shops and other types of businesses can’t open as much as they want because they can’t win Access to the staff who need to open them, “he said.

“One of the biggest challenges is making sure employers can get workers there so we can truly be a fully open economy,” said Abbott.

Economists are unsure whether the rise in federal unemployment is causing potential workers to remain unemployed longer.

A working paper released earlier this month by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco suggested that the $ 300 increase could have little impact on job seekers’ willingness to take up jobs.

President Joe Biden, a Democrat, said he doesn’t think the $ 300 surge is causing individuals to turn down jobs.

“Americans want to work,” he said earlier this month.

Subscribe to CNBC Pro for the live TV stream, deep insights and analysis of how to invest over the next president’s term.

Categories
Politics

Republican Dissent Delays Passage of China Competitiveness Invoice

An expansive $ 195 billion bill, aimed at strengthening the nation’s competitive advantage over China, hit a hook in the Senate Friday after a small group of Republicans objected to the swift pass and slated for next month the bipartisan legislation had voted.

New York Democrat Senator Chuck Schumer, who had urged the move to be approved before the Senate left for its weeklong Memorial Day hiatus, abruptly changed course on Friday, saying he would take the opposition from Republicans Completion will complete the measure in early June. The bill, which Mr. Schumer co-drafted with Indiana Republican Senator Todd Young, is expected to be largely passed with the support of both parties.

Legislation had moved rapidly through the Senate, fueled by growing fears among members of both parties that the United States was losing its economic and technological edge over China. The last-minute delay, however, followed nearly 24 hours of legislative disorder, beginning with an intense round of closed circuit haggling in which the Senators made substantial changes to the sprawling bill, and ended with a midnight broadcast of complaints from a small group of Conservative Senators those who complained had not had time to check the contents.

Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson, along with a small group of Republicans, tarnished the legislative process with an objection late Thursday night, preventing the Democrats from moving the bill forward. Speaking from the Senate early Friday morning, he complained that the Senators had not been given enough time to review the legislation and that none of his preferred priorities – particularly one to fund a wall on the southern border – had been included be.

Other Republicans, who followed suit, argued that the bill – which would also allocate $ 52 billion to a previously created program to subsidize the semiconductor industry – was just too expensive.

“We have been fiscally irresponsible, frankly, and every opportunity we have now to bring this to the attention of the American people must be seized,” said Senator Cynthia Lummis, Republican of Wyoming. “There are concepts in this bill that I find compelling, but it’s now over $ 200 billion.”

Their grievances reflected greater dissatisfaction within their party, and Republican senators expressed anger at how quickly the measure had gone through the chamber. But the goal of the legislation – to compete with China – as well as a variety of parish items added to the bill to increase support, won over a large number of Conservatives, many of whom resented their peers’ antics keeping them had in Washington.

Republican support underscored a wider shift in the party that had followed Donald J. Trump’s leadership. More Conservatives backed federal interventions to shore up American manufacturing, citing an increasing threat from China.

Categories
Politics

Biden price range contains spending plans, enhance in well being, training funds

WASHINGTON — President Joe Biden released his fiscal year 2022 budget request to Congress on Friday, the first formal budget of his presidency and a sharp departure from his predecessor Donald Trump. 

Biden’s budget incorporates his two signature domestic proposals, the American Families Plan and the American Jobs Plan, neither of which has been seriously debated by Congress yet. 

It also illustrates how different Biden’s priorities are from Trump’s. For example, it requests an increase of 41% for the Department of Education over last year, plus 23% more for the Department of Health and Human Services, and 22% more for the Environmental Protection Agency. 

Funding for the Department of Homeland Security, which carried out Trump’s aggressive immigration policies, would decrease by a tenth of a percent. Another Trump priority, the Department of Defense, would see an increase in funding of just 2%. 

On a personal level, Biden views his budget as a reflection of his values. He often quotes his own father as having said, “Don’t tell me what you value. Show me your budget, and I’ll tell you what you value.”

The topline budget request for 2022 is $6 trillion. But of this, only $300 billion is new spending requested for next year. Instead, as in every presidential budget, the vast majority of the money in it will be spent on programs the government is obligated by law to fund, such as Medicare, Social Security and interest on the national debt. 

All told, around $1.5 trillion was requested for discretionary items in FY 2022, which includes the funding of all federal agencies. Approximately half of that is already marked for the Defense Department.

On the pay-for side, Biden’s budget incorporates a wide variety of changes to the tax code that the White House says can fund his multitrillion-dollar domestic spending plans. Chief among these are an increase in the corporate tax rate from 21% to 28%, as well as increased IRS enforcement and higher taxes on the wealthiest taxpayers. 

The tax changes also include a set of “Made in America” tax changes that penalize U.S. companies for offshoring jobs, especially to make goods that are then sold back to American consumers. 

As with most presidential budgets, the White House relies on optimistic projections of unemployment rates and GDP growth to argue that the expensive spending plans will pay for themselves in increased growth.

Unemployment, the White House projects, will fall to 4.7% by the end of the year, 4.1% in 2022 and 3.8% the following year. After that, it projects unemployment will remain at 3.8% for the ensuing seven years.

Biden’s budget also projects that inflation will reach no more than 2.3% annually over the next 10 years, reflecting the administration’s belief that concerns among some economists about runaway inflation are overblown.

Speaking to reporters prior to the release of the plan Friday, Cecilia Rouse, the chair of Biden’s Council of Economic Advisers, said that historically low interest rates make now an ideal time for the federal government to take on additional debt to modernize the economy and expand the social safety net. 

Shalanda Young, the acting director of OMB, said interest rates will rise slightly over time, but she believes they will remain comparatively low thanks to “a global, persistent phenomenon” of lower interest.

The White House projects that over time, Biden’s proposals would increase productivity and consumer spending enough to pay for themselves and eventually decrease the deficit in 15 years. 

Biden’s budget has already come under scrutiny from some progressives, who note that it does not include a health-care public option, which was one of Biden’s campaign pledges. 

White House officials said Biden would instead look to Congress to help him create a public option and to pass a bill that permits Medicare to negotiate with pharmaceutical companies on drug prices. 

Like all presidential budgets, Biden’s is one part plan and one part wish list, intended to illustrate the president’s policy priorities as much as it is to inform congressional appropriators.

Dependent upon Congress to actually get passed into law, Biden’s budget will likely be altered in ways big and small before it is finally appropriated by Congress. But with Democrats in control of both chambers this year, Biden has a far better chance of seeing his major priorities reflected in the final outcome than most of his recent predecessors did.

In a statement accompanying the release of the budget, the president said the document is “a budget for what our economy can be, who our economy can serve, and how we can build it back better by putting the needs, goals, ingenuity, and strength of the American people front and center.”

You can read the president’s entire budget here.

Categories
Politics

How Ranked-Alternative Voting May Have an effect on New York’s Mayoral Race

The competition for the nomination of the Democratic Mayor of New York City is wide open. It’s the kind of race that a ranking vote is designed to help with, with voters backing their top poll without losing the opportunity to weigh the most suitable candidates.

It’s also the type of race that could test one of the main risks of a ranked poll: a phenomenon known as ballot exhaustion. A ballot is considered “exhausted” when every candidate classified by a voter has been eliminated and this ballot is no longer included in the election.

With so many viable candidates and most New Yorkers first-time ranking polls, all the ingredients for a large number of depleted ballots are in place. If the race is close enough, it is a factor that could even decide the choice.

This possibility does not necessarily mean that New Yorkers are worse off when it comes to voting according to the rankings. However, the risk of exhaustion of the ballot paper is an underestimated reason why the alleged advantages are not always recognized when voting by ranking.

Cities and other local governments have polled eight states and across Maine nationwide. It will be used for the first time this year in the New York Mayor’s Race, allowing voters to rate up to five candidates in their order of preference.

If no candidate receives a majority of the first preferential votes, the race is decided by an immediate runoff: the candidate with the fewest votes in first place is eliminated, and the votes of those who preferred the eliminated candidate are voted on the second of these voters transfer decisions. The process continues until a candidate wins a majority of the remaining ballots.

However, such a system is complicated. It urges voters to use a new and unusual set of rules to make many more decisions than they would normally have to make. As a result, many will not rate the maximum number of candidates. There is a possibility that the election result will be different if every voter has filled out a complete voting slip.

A recent poll by the Manhattan Institute / Public Opinion Strategies found evidence that ballot exhaustion could be a major factor in New York’s mayoral elections. The poll, which asked voters to complete the full ballot, found that Eric Adams led Andrew Yang by 52 to 48 percent in a simulated instant runoff election. Behind the top scores lurked a group of 23 percent of respondents who had rated some candidates but had not rated Mr. Yang or Mr. Adams. If these voters had preferred Mr. Yang, the poll might have turned out differently.

A fatigue rate of 23 percent would be pretty high, but not without precedent. In the 2011 San Francisco Mayor’s Race, 27 percent of the ballots were neither of the two candidates who made it to the finals. And, on average, 12 percent of the ballots in the three special city council elections held in New York City this year were exhausted.

Even a lower percentage of depleted ballots can make a difference in a tight race. An analogous case is the special mayoral election in San Francisco in 2018, in which London Breed prevailed by just under one percentage point. In that race, 9 percent of the ballots rated neither Ms. Breed nor runner-up Mark Leno.

It’s impossible to know for sure, but there are plausible reasons to believe that if each voter had chosen one of the two final candidates, Mr. Leno would have won the election. Mr. Leno, for example, won broadcast votes – those cast by voters who did not select either Ms. Breed or Mr. Leno as their first choice – by a margin of 69 to 31 percent; he would have won if the exhausted ballots had expressed a similar preference.

The large number of depleted ballots in ranked elections might come as a bit of a surprise as the format is designed to ensure voters don’t waste their ballots by supporting non-viable candidates. In the archetypal case, the choice of rank could allow voters to endorse a small party candidate like Ralph Nader without the risk of jeopardizing their preferred large party candidate, whom they could safely move to second place.

Voters, however, do not always have the same degree of clarity about which candidates will make the final round of voting as they would have in the 2000 presidential election when Mr Nader finished third as the Green candidate with almost three million votes. Even without eligibility to vote, the primaries often have flowing multi-candidate areas where clear favorites in the general election are nowhere near as obvious as a Democrat versus a Republican.

Fortunately, ranking voting tends to increase the number of options available to voters and tarnish what may otherwise be a relatively clear final choice. Interest groups and ideological factions have less incentive to group behind a single candidate in a ranked election, knowing that their voters can still group behind a single candidate on election day.

Partly as a result, the number of depleted ballots is highest in wide-open races, where voters have the least clarity about the likely endgame.

In the three ranked special elections for New York City Council seats, the number of ballots exhausted was higher in races without a strong first-round candidate. For example, when the top candidate had only 28 percent of the vote in the first ballot in the 15th district, 18 percent of voters had not rated either of the two best candidates.

Understand the NYC Mayoral Race

    • Who is running for mayor? There are more than a dozen people in the running to become New York’s next mayor, and the primary is on June 22nd. Here is an overview of the candidates.
    • Get to know the candidates: We’ve hired leading mayoral candidates on everything from police reform and climate change to their preferred bagel order and training routine.
    • What is a ranking poll? New York City started voting in the primary this year, and voters can list up to five candidates in order of preference. Confused? We can help.

In the mayor’s primary today, the New York Democrats can’t be sure whether there will likely be a final matchup. There are currently 13 Democratic candidates in the running, at least five of whom can be considered front runners. Andrew Yang, the lead polling candidate for most of the year, has declined in recent polls; others, like Kathryn Garcia, seem to be on the rise. With so much uncertainty, even political junkies may not be entirely sure whether their vote will have an impact in the finals.

Voters who are not political junkies have a very different challenge. Voting according to the ranking is demanding. Voters have to make informed judgments about many more candidates than they would otherwise. Less informed voters are less likely to make such judgments and are therefore less likely to rate the maximum number of candidates, which increases the likelihood that they will not list either of the last two candidates on the ballot.

Other voters may not fully understand how ranking works. In a NY1 / Ipsos poll in April, only 53 percent of likely voters said they were very familiar with the ranking and 28 percent said they were uncomfortable with it.

According to a 2004 study by the Public Research Institute, only 36 percent of San Francisco voters who did not fully understand the ranking rated the maximum number of candidates in the 2004 mayoral contest, compared with 63 percent of those who said at least they did understood pretty well.

In order to take full advantage of the leaderboard choice, voters need to know something that is often not given: it works through the instant drain. This may seem obvious, but it is not mentioned on the ballot, it is not mentioned in the educational material sent by the city (and received at my address), and it is not highlighted on the city’s election website. There isn’t even an explanation as to why candidates are ranked.

Without an explanation of how their ballots affect election results, voters may not understand why it is in their best interest to rate the maximum number of candidates.

Categories
Politics

Biden says rising wages are an indication his financial agenda is working

WASHINGTON — After weeks of defending his economic policies against critics who blame them for overheating the economy, President Joe Biden went on the offensive Thursday, arguing that rising wages are a sign his agenda is boosting the fortunes of working Americans.

“The bottom line is this: The Biden economic plan is working,” said the president in a speech at Cuyahoga Community College in Cleveland, Ohio. “We’ve had record job creation, we’re seeing record economic growth, we’re creating a new paradigm. One that rewards work — the working people in this nation, not just those at the top.”

Republicans and business groups claim that the enhanced federal unemployment benefits in Biden’s American Rescue Plan, his signature domestic accomplishment, are to blame for a “labor shortage” that has forced corporations like McDonald’s and Bank of America to raise their minimum hourly wage.

Biden rejected this view of the economy: “When it comes to the economy we’re building, rising wages aren’t a bug, they’re a feature,” he said.

The president on Thursday renewed his call for Congress to raise the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour.

Biden credited the American Rescue Plan and his ambitious vaccination program with jump-starting a U.S. economy battered by the Covid pandemic.

The bill passed with no Republican votes, but several Republicans later sought to take credit for it with their constituents despite having voted against it.

“I’m not going to embarrass anyone, but I have here a list of who, back in their districts, they’re bragging about the rescue plan,” said Biden, holding up a list of Republicans who touted the relief funding.

“I mean, some people have no shame,” he added. “I’m happy they know that it benefited their constituents, that’s okay with me. But if you are going to try to take credit for what we’ve done, don’t get in the way of what we still need to do.”

As Biden seeks to build support for more than $3 trillion in additional economic stimulus programs, Republican opposition is solidifying.

As the economy improves, conservatives are arguing that Biden’s proposed stimulus is no longer necessary.

Private sector wages rose 3% in the first quarter of this year, the fastest pace in at least 25 years, according to economist Mark Zandi. This has made it harder for employers to attract workers willing to work for minimum hourly wages.

“We want to get something economists call full employment, where instead of workers competing with each other for jobs that are scarce, we want employers to compete to attract workers,” Biden said.

Biden rejected the growing alarm among some businesses and economists that higher wages and full employment will lead to runaway inflation. Instead, he said, corporations can afford to pay workers more without passing on higher prices to consumers.

“A lot of companies have done extremely well in this crisis, and good for them,” he said. “The simple fact is, though, corporate profits are the highest they’ve been in decades. Workers’ pay is at the lowest it’s been in 70 years. We have more than ample room to raise worker pay without raising customer prices.”

In addition to supporting higher wages, Biden pressed for a corporate tax increase to 28%, revenue he will need to fund his ambitious infrastructure proposal. The American Jobs Plan proposes to spend around $2 trillion over the next decade revitalizing the country’s infrastructure and manufacturing sector.

The president also made it clear that he sees these tax hikes as more than just a necessary evil to fund his big plans: They’re a key part of reestablishing a sense of shared responsibility and shared burden across the American economy.

“We have a chance to seize the economic momentum of the first months of my administration, not just to build back, but to build back better,” he said. “And this time we’re going to deal everyone in.”

Categories
Politics

Russia Seems to Carry Out Hack By way of System Utilized by U.S. Support Company

Hackers connected to Russia’s main intelligence agency secretly seized an email system used by the Foreign Ministry’s international aid agency to dig into the computer networks of human rights groups and other organizations that President Vladimir V. Microsoft Corporation announced on Thursday that they were critical of Putin.

The breach was only discovered three weeks before President Biden’s planned meeting with Putin in Geneva and at a moment of increasing tensions between the two nations – also due to a series of increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks from Russia.

The newly uncovered attack was also particularly bold: By breaching the systems of a supplier used by the federal government, the hackers only this week sent e-mails from more than 3,000 real-looking accounts addressed to more than 150 organizations that are receiving regularly Communications from the United States Agency for International Development.

The e-mail was implanted with code that gave the hackers unrestricted access to the recipient’s computer systems, from “stealing data to infecting other computers on a network,” wrote Tom Burt, a Microsoft vice president, on Thursday evening.

Last month, Mr Biden announced a series of new sanctions against Russia and the expulsion of diplomats for an elaborate hacking operation called SolarWinds that used novel methods to injure at least seven government agencies and hundreds of large American companies.

This attack went undetected by the US government for nine months until it was discovered by a cybersecurity company. In April, Mr Biden said he could have reacted much more strongly but chose “proportionate” because he did not want to “start a cycle of escalation and conflict with Russia”.

However, the Russian response appears to have been an escalation. The malicious activity had only started for the past week. This suggests that the sanctions and any additional covert measures the White House has put in place – part of a strategy to create “seen and invisible” costs for Moscow – have not stifled the Russian government’s appetite for disruption.

A spokesman for the agency for cybersecurity and infrastructure security in the Department of Homeland Security said late Thursday that the agency is “aware of the possible compromise” with the agency for international development and is working “with the FBI and USAID to better understand it. ” Level of compromise and support for potential victims. “

Microsoft identified the Russian group behind the attack as Nobelium and said it was the same group responsible for the SolarWinds hack. Last month, the US government explicitly stated that SolarWinds was the work of the SVR, one of the KGB’s most successful Soviet-era spin-offs

The same agency was involved in the National Democratic Committee hacking attacks in 2016 and previously in attacks on the Pentagon, White House email system, and State Department unclassified communications.

It’s gotten increasingly aggressive and creative, say federal officials and experts. The SolarWinds attack was never discovered by the US government and was carried out through code implanted in network management software that is widely used by the government and private companies. When customers updated SolarWinds software – much like an iPhone would do overnight – they were unwittingly letting in an intruder.

The victims last year included the ministries of homeland security and energy, as well as nuclear laboratories.

When Mr Biden took office, he ordered a study into the SolarWinds case, and officials have been working to prevent future supply chain attacks where adversaries infect software used by federal agencies. This is similar to this case when Microsoft’s security team caught the hackers using a widely used Constant Contact email service to send malicious emails that appeared to come from real-world addresses belonging to the International Development Agency.

Updated

May 26, 2021, 9:17 p.m. ET

But the content was barely subtle at times. In an email sent through the Constant Contact service on Tuesday, the hackers highlighted a message claiming that “Donald Trump had published new emails about election fraud.” The email contained a link that, if clicked, would place malicious files on recipients’ computers.

Microsoft noted that the attack was “significantly” different from the SolarWinds hack and used new tools and craftsmanship to avoid detection. It was said that the attack was still ongoing and that the hackers continued to send spearphishing emails with increasing speed and reach. Because of this, Microsoft took the unusual step of naming the agency whose email addresses were used and posting examples of the spoofed email.

Essentially, the Russians got into the Agency for International Development’s email system by circling the agency and going straight to their software suppliers. Constant Contact manages bulk emails and other communications on behalf of the aid organization.

“Nobelium launched this week’s attacks by gaining access to USAID’s Constant Contact account,” wrote Microsoft’s Burt. Constant contact could not be reached for comment.

Microsoft, like other large cybersecurity companies, maintains a large network of sensors to search for malicious activity on the Internet and is often a target itself. It was instrumental in uncovering the SolarWinds attack.

In this case, Microsoft reported, the hackers’ goal was not to track down the State Department or the aid agency, but rather to use their connections to get into groups that work on the ground – and in many cases, Putin’s most powerful ones Critic.

“At least a quarter of the target organizations were involved in international development, humanitarian and human rights work,” wrote Burt. Although he did not name them, many such groups have exposed Russian actions against dissidents or protested the poisoning, conviction and imprisonment of Russia’s most prominent opposition leader, Alexei A. Navalny.

The attack suggests that Russian intelligence agencies are stepping up their campaign, perhaps to demonstrate that the country would not step down in the face of sanctions, the eviction of diplomats and other pressures.

Mr Biden raised the SolarWinds attack on a phone call with Mr Putin last month, telling him that the sanctions and expulsions are evidence that his government would no longer tolerate an accelerated pace of cyber operations.

Mr Putin has denied Russia’s involvement, and some Russian news outlets have argued that the United States launched the attack against itself.

At the same time, the White House also imposed a number of new sanctions on Russian individuals and assets, including new restrictions on buying Russia’s national debt that will make it difficult for Russia to raise money and support its currency.

“This is the beginning of a new US campaign against malicious behavior by Russia,” Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen said at the time.

Tensions over the housing of cybercriminals in Russia increased significantly this month after a ransomware group took corporate networks of the Colonial Pipeline hostage. The attack forced the company to shut down a pipeline that brings nearly half of its gasoline, diesel and jet fuel to the east coast, sparking a spike in gas prices and panic buying at the pump.

Mr Biden said two weeks ago: “We spoke in direct communication with Moscow about the need for the responsible countries to take decisive action against these ransomware networks. ”

Categories
Politics

Jamie Dimon is skeptical of Biden’s minimal international company tax price

JPMorgan Chase Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon testifies during a US House Financial Services Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, June 19, 2012, about JPMorgan Chase’s trading loss.

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Citigroup chief Jane Fraser on Thursday expressed concerns over President Joe Biden’s effort to hike the amount of taxes businesses pay on foreign profits and a concurrent goal to set a global minimum corporate tax rate.

Testifying before the House Financial Services Committee, Dimon argued that a plan to raise the U.S. tax rate on foreign profits to 21% could, over time, push firms to move business overseas. Dimon thinks that shift could accelerate if allies renege on their promises to impose a similar global minimum tax rate.

“America would be the only country, I think, in the world that would have what we call a global tax rate,” he said, referring to the proposed 21% rate on U.S. companies’ foreign income.

“There’s no question in my mind that, at the margin … that will drive capital and, eventually, brains and R&D and investment overseas,” he said. “And that would be a mistake for America.”

Fraser, Citigroup’s new CEO, concurred, adding that “it’s very hard to get other countries to sign on to an equivalent program despite some optimism.”

“I think that will be extremely difficult,” she continued. “And, therefore, it could put the U.S. in a position of being less competitive around the world.”

The commentary from two of the nation’s top bankers came as the Biden administration continued to seek international support for a global minimum corporate tax rate of 15%.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

The Treasury Department, which has taken the lead in trying to persuade Germany, France and others to back the plan, contends that a universal floor on corporate tax rates would allow governments to more effectively generate tax revenue.

Neither the White House nor the Treasury Department wished to comment on the record.

The current system, according to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, incentives countries to offer lower effective corporate rates over time in a “race to the bottom” to lure corporations across geographies.

But Dimon and others have expressed doubts over any chance of long-term success in persuading U.S. peers to adhere to a global minimum at 15% or any other level, especially when it may be more lucrative for governments to cheat the system by offering backdoor incentives or flouting the agreement entirely.

A JPMorgan spokesperson explained that the concern is that the U.S. would adopt a relatively high tax on foreign income, at 21%, only for foreign partners to shirk their own tax promises. That scenario could put the U.S. at a competitive disadvantage and encourage the offshoring of factories, profits and workers.

The Treasury Department has reiterated that the 15% proposal should be thought of as a sort-of floor and that subsequent talks could eventually push it higher. That, in theory, could work to reduce a tax disadvantage.

That the White House is keen to coax others into a global minimum tax isn’t necessarily a surprise given the amount of spending it wants to see to achieve its agenda priorities.

Its American Jobs Plan, an infrastructure-focused proposal, would funnel $2.3 trillion over a decade into traditional infrastructure as well as toward scientific innovation, pay for home health aides and the construction of 500,000 electric-vehicle charging stations.

The GOP countered with its own version Thursday, a more modest $928 billion proposal with a greater emphasis on “hard” infrastructure like roads, bridges and public transit.

The White House also hopes to enact the American Families Plan, a $1.8 trillion piece of legislation aimed at funding for social programs like paid family leave, free early childhood education and free community college. 

Biden’s economic team says its Made In America tax plan would help cover the costs of both bills. Broadly, that tax plan seeks fortify the IRS and crack down on tax evasion, raise the amount the wealthiest households pay on capital gains, and hike the rate U.S. businesses pay on domestic profits to 28%.

President Donald Trump’s 2017 tax cuts reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate to 21% from 35%. 

The bank CEOs appeared on Wednesday before the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs.

One testy exchange from that hearing came between Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., and Dimon. Warren accused JPMorgan Chase, and the other consumer banks, of not doing enough to communicate to its customers about relaxation of certain overdraft fee rules during the coronavirus outbreak.

Dimon countered that the bank had accommodated customers who had made qualifying overdraft fee waiver requests and that the bank would not be refunding billions it collected in such fees in 2020.