Categories
Politics

‘We’re Free As a result of They Have been Courageous’

Memorial Day 2021, a day honoring the sacrifices of the nation’s veterans, was particularly poignant a year after many memorial ceremonies – and many family outings and barbecues – were curtailed because of the coronavirus pandemic. The parades, which were canceled in 2020, took place again in 2021. The services held online last year were continued in person this year. The holiday traffic returned, as did the beach trips – at least in parts of the country that were not cursed with cold rainy weather.

President Biden honored the fallen at Arlington National Cemetery and delivered an emotional speech under blue, sunlit skies just one day after the five-year anniversary of the death of his son Beau, who served in Iraq. “It can be painful to remember, but the pain is how we feel and how we heal,” Biden said after laying a wreath at the Tomb of the Unknown. He urged the Americans to keep the fallen military in mind. “We are free because they were brave,” he said.

President Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris at Arlington National Cemetery in Arlington, Virginia.

A member of the military stands near the Tomb of the Unknown before a wreath-laying ceremony at Arlington National Cemetery.

Members of the military are reflected in the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington.

Beach goers on South Beach in Miami Beach, Florida.

Veterans during a Memorial Day parade in Myrtle Beach, SC

A family in search of horseshoe crabs on Orchard Beach in the Bronx.

Light a fire to keep warm on Orchard Beach and longtime Bronx residents playing dominoes.

Hughes Van Ellis, a veteran who survived the Tulsa Race massacre, is awarded a medal on the event’s 100th anniversary.

In Barnstable, Massachusetts, a police honor guard remembered the town’s war dead.

The Oakmont-Verona Memorial Day Parade in Oakmont, Pennsylvania.

Kyle Watts, an Ohio vacationer, uses a metal detector in Myrtle Beach.

Crowds enjoy the waves on Myrtle Beach.

Categories
Politics

Senate Republicans block invoice to probe Capitol revolt

U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) speaks after the Republican Senate lunch on Capitol Hill in Washington Jan.

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Senate Republicans on Friday blocked a bill that would set up an independent commission to investigate the January 6 riot in the U.S. Capitol as Democrats and the GOP argue over how best to investigate the legislature attack and another attack on the democratic process can be prevented.

With 54 to 35 votes, the measure did not reach the threshold required to overcome a filibuster, as almost all GOP senators were against it. Six Republicans voted to move the proposal forward: Bill Cassidy from Louisiana, Susan Collins from Maine, Lisa Murkowski from Alaska, Rob Portman from Ohio, Mitt Romney from Utah and Ben Sasse from Nebraska. All of these senators, with the exception of Portman, voted in February to hold former President Donald Trump guilty of inciting a riot.

The vote likely undermines the creation of a Democratic panel, and some Republicans have said it is important to understand what led to the violent attempt to disrupt the transfer of power to President Joe Biden. GOP leaders have claimed the commission could redouble existing efforts by the Department of Justice and Congressional committees to investigate the pro-Trump mob attack that resulted in five deaths, including that of Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick.

Sicknick’s mother met with a handful of Republican senators Thursday and urged them to support the commission.

Republicans have tried to divert attention from the uprising – to which Trump’s 2020 election conspiracy theories contributed – as they seek to regain control of Congress in next year’s midterm elections. Top GOP lawmakers, particularly in the House of Representatives, have set themselves the goal of suppressing criticism of Trump, who remains the Republican Party’s most popular figure.

“Fear of or allegiance to Donald Trump, the Republican minority only prevented the American people from learning the full truth about January 6,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., said after the vote.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

The Democratic-owned House of Representatives passed the bipartisan bill earlier this month with 252-175 votes. 35 Republicans supported it, while 175 GOP officials voted against. House Republican leaders pushed for resistance after Rep. John Katko, RN.Y. negotiated the deal with Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss.

The bill failed to win the Republican votes it needed to move forward in the evenly divided Senate after minority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Urged his faction to oppose it.

“I will continue to support the real, serious work of our criminal justice system and our own Senate committees,” McConnell said Thursday before the vote. “And I will continue to urge my colleagues to oppose this superfluous shift if the Senate has to vote.”

The bill would set up a 10-person commission to study the factors that led to the uprising. The Democratic and Republican leaders would each appoint half of the members who could not be current government officials.

The subpoenaed panel would report on its investigation by the end of the year.

Schumer urged senators Thursday to back the commission law, saying the country must eradicate belief in Trump’s unsubstantiated claims that widespread fraud led to his defeat in November. He called the lies a “cancer” in the GOP.

“We have to investigate, uncover and report the truth,” he said. “We need to make a trustworthy record of what really happened on January 6th and what happened before that. That is exactly what this commission is supposed to do, non-partisan and right down the middle.”

At least one senior Republican in the Senate has suggested that the panel would detract from the party’s mid-term messages. John Thune, RS.D., said earlier this month, “Anything that makes us rewarm the 2020 elections is, in my opinion, a day where we don’t contrast ourselves with the very radical left-wing Democrats’ agenda can.” “

Senator Joe Manchin, the most conservative Democrat in the Senate, has repeatedly called on Republicans to vote in favor of setting up the commission. However, the West Virginia senator said he still would not team up with most of his Democratic counterparts to get rid of the filibuster that would allow the party to pass the bill on its own.

Biden, whose takeover of the presidency the pro-Trump mob sought to disrupt, scoffed Thursday at the prospect of senators voting against the commission’s establishment.

“I can’t imagine anyone voting against setting up a commission for the biggest attack on the Capitol since the Civil War,” he said.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Politics

Texas Democrats Stymie GOP Voting Invoice, for Now

During debate late Sunday, State Representative Travis Clardy, a Republican, acknowledged that advancing the bill through the conference committee had proved to be a lengthy process, but he defended the panel’s methods.

“A lot of this was done late, I don’t get to control the clock,” Mr. Clardy said. “But I can assure you that the members of the committee did their absolute best, dead-level best, to make sure we’ve provided information to all members, including representative rows. And then we did everything that we could to make sure this was transparent.”

The effort in Texas, a major state with a booming population, represents the apex of the national Republican push to install tall new barriers to voting after President Donald J. Trump’s loss last year to Joseph R. Biden Jr., with expansive restrictions already becoming law in Iowa, Georgia and Florida in 2021. Fueled by Mr. Trump’s false claims of widespread fraud in the election, Republicans have passed the bills almost entirely along partisan lines, brushing off the protestations of Democrats, civil rights groups, voting rights groups, major corporations and faith leaders.

But the party’s setback in Texas is unlikely to calm Democratic pressure in Washington to pass new federal voting laws. President Biden and key Democrats in Congress are confronting rising calls from their party to do whatever is needed — including abolishing the Senate filibuster, which moderate senators have resisted — to push through a major voting rights and elections overhaul that would counteract the wave of Republican laws.

After the Texas bill became public on Saturday, Mr. Biden denounced it, along with similar measures in Georgia and Florida, as “an assault on democracy,” blasting the moves in a statement as “disproportionately targeting Black and Brown Americans.”

The Battle Over Voting Rights

Amid months of false claims by former President Donald J. Trump that the 2020 election was stolen from him, Republican lawmakers in many states are marching ahead to pass laws making it harder to vote and changing how elections are run, frustrating Democrats and even some election officials in their own party.

    • A Key Topic: The rules and procedures of elections have become a central issue in American politics. The Brennan Center for Justice, a liberal-leaning law and justice institute at New York University, counts 361 bills in 47 states that seek to tighten voting rules. At the same time, 843 bills have been introduced with provisions to improve access to voting.
    • The Basic Measures: The restrictions vary by state but can include limiting the use of ballot drop boxes, adding identification requirements for voters requesting absentee ballots, and doing away with local laws that allow automatic registration for absentee voting.
    • More Extreme Measures: Some measures go beyond altering how one votes, including tweaking Electoral College and judicial election rules, clamping down on citizen-led ballot initiatives, and outlawing private donations that provide resources for administering elections.
    • Pushback: This Republican effort has led Democrats in Congress to find a way to pass federal voting laws. A sweeping voting rights bill passed the House in March, but faces difficult obstacles in the Senate. Republicans have remained united against the proposal and even if the bill became law, it would likely face steep legal challenges.
    • Florida: Measures here include limiting the use of drop boxes, adding more identification requirements for absentee ballots, requiring voters to request an absentee ballot for each election, limiting who could collect and drop off ballots, and further empowering partisan observers during the ballot-counting process.
    • Texas: The next big move could happen here, where Republicans in the legislature are brushing aside objections from corporate titans and moving on a vast election bill that would be among the most severe in the nation. It would impose new restrictions on early voting, ban drive-through voting, threaten election officials with harsher penalties and greatly empower partisan poll watchers.
    • Other States: Arizona’s Republican-controlled Legislature passed a bill that would limit the distribution of mail ballots. The bill, which includes removing voters from the state’s Permanent Early Voting List if they do not cast a ballot at least once every two years, may be only the first in a series of voting restrictions to be enacted there. Georgia Republicans in March enacted far-reaching new voting laws that limit ballot drop-boxes and make the distribution of water within certain boundaries of a polling station a misdemeanor. Iowa has also imposed new limits, including reducing the period for early voting and in-person voting hours on Election Day. And bills to restrict voting have been moving through the Republican-led Legislature in Michigan.

He urged Congress to pass Democrats’ voting bills, the most ambitious of which, the For the People Act, would expand access to the ballot, reduce the role of money in politics, strengthen enforcement of existing election laws and limit gerrymandering. Another measure, the narrower John Lewis Voting Rights Act, would restore crucial parts of the 1965 Voting Rights Act that were struck down by the Supreme Court in 2013, including the requirement that some states receive federal approval before changing their election laws.

Categories
Politics

Former Obama advisor Seth Andrew in talks to resolve constitution college theft

Seth Andrew during a TEDx conversation

Source: TEDx talks | Youtube

Federal prosecutors and an attorney for former White House education advisor Seth Andrew are in initial talks over a possible removal of the criminal case accusing him of tearing down a network of charter schools he founded for $ 218,000 .

These discussions came to light just a month after Andrew was arrested on a New York City criminal complaint for wire fraud, money laundering, and misrepresentation against a financial institution.

However, one person familiar with these discussions, who had requested anonymity due to the nature of the conversations, said they were not referring to a possible plea deal, but rather giving Andrew’s new attorney time to update on the case.

Free for a $ 500,000 bond, 42-year-old Andrew is the founder of Democracy Prep Public Schools, which he left in 2013 to join then-President Barack Obama’s administration.

Prosecutors last month accused Andrew of looting a number of school escrow accounts on the Democracy Prep network in 2019.

Andrew then allegedly used most of the money to keep a minimum number of bank accounts, which in turn gave him a cheaper rate on the $ 1.776 million mortgage on the Manhattan residence he and his wife, the CBS news anchor, he owned Lana Zak, shares.

Andrew and Zak received a mortgage rate of only 2.5% or 0.5% less than they should have paid because they had more than $ 1 million on deposit with the lender.

Without the more than $ 142,000 in allegedly stolen funds that he deposited with the lender, “Andrew could only have received an interest deduction of 0.375%,” the US Attorney’s Office for the southern borough of New York found last month.

Democracy Prep said it learned of the unauthorized withdrawals and then reached out to the authorities.

Zak, who has three children with Andrew, is not accused of wrongdoing.

Thursday was the legal 30-day deadline within which Andrew will be charged in the case, either by grand jury indictment or by some other type of indictment known as informational. This is usually filed after a defendant has indicated willingness to plead guilty.

On Thursday, prosecutors asked Manhattan Federal Supreme Court judge Barbara Moses to extend the deadline on the case.

“The defense attorney and the government are discussing a possible disposition for this case and other matters,” US assistant attorney Ryan Finkel wrote in a trial.

“Therefore, the government is asking for a 30-day continuation until June 27, 2021 to continue the above discussions. The undersigned spoke personally with the defense attorney, who had expressly consented to this request.”

Moses granted the request for continuation in an order published on Friday.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

An injunction in criminal proceedings usually relates to a confession of guilt, an acquittal in the process or, less often, the dismissal of charges by prosecutors.

It is common for prosecutors and defense lawyers to discuss a possible objection agreement, but such discussions do not always end in an agreement.

And the person familiar with the discussions in Andrew’s case said the postponement of the indictment was because his attorney, Edward Kim, was recently hired to represent him on the case, rather than due to taking the case immediately resolve through a plea.

The US Attorney’s Office for the southern borough of New York declined to comment.

Kim also declined to comment.

Until his arrest, Andrew was CEO of Democracy Builders, a group that describes itself as “the social sector studio that created more than $ 1 billion in companies that are the face of education, democracy and technology change all over the world “.

Democracy Builders bought the former Marlboro College campus in Marlboro, Vermont, for more than $ 1.7 million in 2020 with the aim of building a school there called Degrees of Freedom.

The group removed Andrew as chairman of the board of directors and restricted his access to all financial accounts after learning of his arrest.

Natasha Trivers, current executive director of the Charter School network Democracy Prep, said in an email to the network’s families last month that Andrews “alleged acts are a profound betrayal of everything we stand for and of you and your children. the scholars and families who do that. ” we serve. “

Trivers added, “The network’s finances remain strong and at no point has any of Seth Andrew’s activities had a negative impact on our scholars or the functioning of our schools.”

Categories
Politics

Biden’s Funds Has Racial Fairness Efforts Baked In

WASHINGTON – Six days after his inauguration, President Biden vowed that his administration would see everything through the lens of racial equality and make it the “business of the entire government.”

On Friday, his $ 6 trillion budget began delivering on that promise.

Spread across the President’s enormous spending plan are tens of billions of dollars worth of programs specifically designed to strengthen the fortunes of blacks, Asians, tribal communities, and other historically underserved groups in the United States.

Mr Biden is not the first President to spend money on such programs. And civil rights activists said the budget released on Friday fell short on some critical areas like student loans, where they say more money is needed to address a longstanding lack of fairness and a one-sided burden on minorities.

“It’s going in the right direction, but it’s not a perfect document,” said Derrick Johnson, the NAACP president, who was disappointed that the president’s budget did not include the repayment of student loan debt, which falls disproportionately to black Americans.

But he added that his organization was pleased that the president “continued to meet one of his priorities”.

This idea of ​​paying special attention to the distribution of taxpayers’ money among racial groups has never been approached as methodically as this year, according to supporters of Mr Biden. When asked about the President’s equity agenda on Friday, Shalanda Young, acting President’s Budget Director, said her department “built” this into the overall spending plan by “giving our agencies” clear instructions that they should use this lens in their implementation these programs are supposed to. “

“This is not something we have to shout,” she said. “This is something that should be ubiquitous in how the government does its business.”

Much of the president’s huge budget goes into expenditures that aren’t explicitly split by race: health care, education, military, transportation, agriculture, retirement planning, and foreign affairs, among others.

However, across all of these programs, Mr. Biden’s team has suggested higher spending to ensure people with color and others who are often left behind get a bigger share of the total cake.

Among the large and small budget items determined by equity:

  • $ 3 Billion to Reduce Maternal Mortality and Eliminate Racial Disparity in Maternal Mortality.

  • $ 15 billion for Highways to Neighborhoods, a program to reconnect neighborhoods that were cut off by infrastructure projects developed decades ago.

  • $ 900 million to fund tribal efforts to expand affordable housing.

  • $ 936 million for an initiative to accelerate environmental and economic justice for the Environmental Protection Agency.

  • $ 110 million for a Thriving Communities initiative to promote transportation equity through grants to underserved communities.

  • $ 39 billion in student grants for low- and middle-income students who historically attend black colleges and universities, as well as students who serve other minorities.

Mr Biden predicted these kinds of budget decisions in his early days in office. In a speech announcing his “justice agenda,” the president said he was determined to go further than his predecessors in addressing groups he said had been left behind too often.

“We have to open America’s promise to every American,” he said during the January 26 speech. “And that means that we don’t have to make the issue of racial justice an issue for just one government department.”

This approach has angered the Conservatives, who accuse the president and his advisors of pursuing a racist agenda against white Americans. Fox News hit the headlines accusing Mr. Biden of trying “to fuel the nationwide division with a ‘racial equity’ push”. And the New York Post published an editorial, “In Push for Woke ‘Equity’, Biden Abandon’s Equality,” accusing the president of being “un-American.”

A group called America First Legal, led by Stephen Miller and Mark Meadows, two top aides to former President Donald J. Trump, received an injunction from a Texas judge this week against Mr. Biden’s efforts by the Small Business Administration Prioritize grants from the $ 28.6 billion Restaurant Revitalization Fund to businesses that belong to minority or underserved groups.

Updated

May 28, 2021, 4:32 p.m. ET

“This ruling is another powerful blow to the Biden government’s unconstitutional decision to select winners and losers based on skin color,” the group said in a statement.

The President is unlikely to back down. Speaking days after his inauguration, he vowed that “every component of the White House and every agency will be involved in this work because promoting justice must be everyone’s business.”

Despite all of Mr. Biden’s energetic rhetoric – he once promised to “no longer allow a narrow, cramped view of this nation’s promise to fester” – his government made little effort on Friday to draw attention to this principle or to highlight details about it how a stock-driven approach would change the way the government spends its money.

Biden’s 2022 budget

    • A new year, a new budget: Fiscal year 2022 for the federal government begins October 1, and President Biden has announced what he plans to spend from that point on. However, all editions require the approval of both Congress Chambers.
    • Ambitious overall spending: President Biden wants the federal government to spend $ 6 trillion in fiscal 2022 and total spending to rise to $ 8.2 trillion by 2031. This would bring the United States to its highest sustainable federal spending level since World War II, while running deficits above $ 1.3 trillion for the next decade.
    • Infrastructure plan: The budget describes the President’s desired first year of investment in his US employment plan, which aims to fund improvements to roads, bridges, public transportation and more with a total of $ 2.3 billion over eight years.
    • Family plan: The budget also addresses the other major spending proposal that Biden has already put forward, his American family plan, which aims to strengthen the United States’ social safety net by expanding access to education, reducing childcare costs, and bringing women in the workforce are supported.
    • Compulsory programs: As usual, mandatory spending on programs like Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare is a significant part of the proposed budget. They grow as the American population ages.
    • Discretionary issues: Funding for each agency and executive program budget would reach approximately $ 1.5 trillion in 2022, a 16 percent increase from the previous budget.
    • How Biden would pay for it: The president would fund his agenda largely through tax hikes for businesses and high earners, which would lead to a decline in budget deficits in the 2030s. Administration officials said tax increases would fully offset plans for jobs and families over the course of 15 years, which the budget request confirms. In the meantime, the budget deficit would stay above $ 1.3 trillion each year.

During a press conference on the introduction of the budget on Friday, Ms. Young and Cecilia Rouse, the chairmen of the White House National Economic Council – both black women – did not mention the president’s equity agenda until a reporter asked about it.

And the budget itself does not seek to quantify the impact of following the presidential instructions in order to make decisions based on a sense of racial justice. There is no “Equity” section in the budget. Aides did not send newsletters to reporters on Friday promoting the “equity spending” in the president’s opening budget.

That left some outreach to civil rights groups and other advocates, who were quick to point out examples of spending that would benefit communities traditionally left behind by previous presidents.

Sara Chieffo, chief lobbyist for the League of Conservation Voters, an environmental group, referred to the Environmental Protection Agency’s $ 936 million initiative to accelerate environmental and economic justice, which aims to clean up the environment in underserved communities .

“The importance of this government’s proposal to make the largest ever investment in color communities and low-income communities that have been exposed to environmental racism for decades cannot be emphasized enough,” said Chieffo.

Marcela Howell, President of In Our Own Voice: National Reproductive Justice Agenda for Black Women, commended the president for investing in programs that specifically benefit black women.

“Kudos also go to President Biden for funding important programs to combat racial justice and economic security,” she said in a statement, adding that “we are making the proposed investments in infrastructure and job creation, affordable childcare and education of workers as well as education “. and more.

The Planned Parenthood Federation of America issued a statement thanking Mr. Biden for what the group called “important investments” that would help “address the maternal mortality crisis and its devastating effects on color communities.”

Categories
Politics

Infrastructure talks can’t go on endlessly, want course by subsequent week

WASHINGTON, DC – FEBRUARY 05: U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg speaks to Amtrak employees during a visit at Union Station February 5, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Alex Wong | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg said Sunday that Senate Democrats and Republicans must establish a clear direction on infrastructure negotiations when Congress returns to Washington after the Memorial Day break, signaling that the White House is losing patience with bipartisan talks.

“By the time that they return, which is June 7 just a week from tomorrow, we need a clear direction,” Buttigieg said during an interview on CNN’s “State of the Union.” “The President keeps saying, ‘inaction is not an option’ and time is not unlimited here. The American people expect us to do something.”

Senate Democrats plan to move forward with crafting a sweeping infrastructure package next month with or without Republican support in order to pass a bill this summer.

The two parties are in ongoing talks but are not close to an agreement on what the plan would include and how the government would pay for the much-needed investments.

Buttigieg said he believes the White House is “getting pretty close to a fish or cut bait moment” on bipartisan negotiations.

“This can’t go on in terms of the condition of our infrastructure, therefore, the negotiations can’t go on forever either,” he said.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

Republicans on Thursday provided President Joe Biden with a $928 billion counteroffer on infrastructure, amounting to roughly half of the $1.7 trillion proposal the administration previously offered. The White House originally put forward a $2.3 trillion infrastructure proposal.

Democrats and Republicans have disagreed on what constitutes infrastructure and how best to pay for the plan.

Democrats have rejected a GOP offer to fund the plan through user fees, arguing that doing so could cause a tax hike for middle-class Americans who drive. Republicans have opposed the Democrats’ proposal to raise the corporate tax rate to at least 25% to pay for the plan.

Democrats could ultimately pass the legislation without GOP support through the process of budget reconciliation, which would require a simple majority vote in the Senate.

Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, the West Virginia Republican leading negotiations with the White House, said that during a Friday phone call with the president, Biden said “let’s get this done” with respect to negotiations.

“We have had some back and forth with his staff to sort of pull back a little bit, but I think we’re smoothing out those edges,” Capito said during an interview on “Fox News Sunday.”

“I think we can get to real compromise, absolutely, because we’re both still in the game,” she said. “We realize this is not easy.”

Categories
Politics

Texas Voting Invoice Nears Passage as Republicans Advance It

In a statement on Saturday, President Biden called the proposed bill, along with similar measures in Georgia and Florida, “an attack on democracy” that disproportionately targeted “black and brown Americans”. He called on lawmakers to resolve the problem by passing democratic voting laws pending in Congress.

“It’s wrong and un-American,” said Mr. Biden. “In the 21st century, we should make it easier, not harder, for everyone eligible to vote to vote.”

Republican lawmakers have often cited voter concerns about electoral fraud – fears fueled by Trump, other Republicans, and the conservative media – to justify new election restrictions, despite no evidence of widespread fraud in the recent American election.

And in their campaign, Republicans have overcome objections from Democrats, constituencies, and big corporations. Companies like American Airlines, Dell Technologies and Microsoft spoke out against Texan law soon after the law was passed, but the pressure has so far been largely ineffective.

The final 67-page bill, known as SB 7, turned out to be the amalgamation of two bulk votes that had worked their way through state legislation. It contained many of the provisions originally put in place by the Republicans, but lawmakers dropped some of the strictest, such as an ordinance on the allocation of voting machines that would have closed polling stations in color communities, and a measure that would have allowed partisan election observers to record the voting process on video.

However, the bill contains a provision that could make it easier to overthrow an election. Texas electoral law found that reversing election results due to fraud allegations required evidence that illegal votes had indeed resulted in an illegitimate victory. If the bill is passed, the number of fraudulent votes required to do so should simply be equal to the difference in the winning votes. It wouldn’t matter who the fraudulent votes were cast for.

Democrats and constituencies were quick to condemn the bill.

“SB 7 is a ruthless law,” said Sarah Labowitz, director of politics and advocacy for the American Civil Liberties Union in Texas. “It is aimed at color voters and voters with disabilities in a state that is already the most difficult voting place in the country.”

Categories
Politics

Schumer says Senate Democrats will work on invoice in June

U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) touts Senate Democrats legislative accomplishments as he holds a news conference at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, March 25, 2021.

Jonathan Ernst | Pool | Reuters

Senate Democrats plan to forge ahead with crafting a massive infrastructure package next month — regardless of whether Republicans get on board — as they push to pass a bill this summer.

Senators will be out of Washington next week for the Memorial Day holiday. When lawmakers return, Democrats aim to write an infrastructure plan that touches on everything from transportation to broadband, utilities and job training.

“As the President continues to discuss infrastructure legislation with Senate Republicans, the committees will hold hearings and continue their work on the Build Back Better agenda — with or without the support of Republican Senators,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., wrote in a letter to Democrats on Friday. “We must pass comprehensive jobs and infrastructure legislation this summer.”

President Joe Biden has worked with Senate Republicans to see if they can strike a bipartisan deal to revamp American infrastructure. After the latest back-and-forth in their talks, the sides appear far from an agreement on what should go into a bill and how the government should pay for it.

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

As the White House and Republicans struggle to reach a consensus, some Democrats have called on their party to try to pass a bill without GOP support. Democrats can do so through the budget reconciliation process, which requires a simple majority vote in the evenly split Senate.

Republicans on Thursday sent Biden a $928 billion infrastructure counteroffer. It came in at roughly half of the $1.7 trillion proposal the White House last sent the GOP. The Biden administration first put forward a $2.3 trillion infrastructure plan.

Responding to the offer, White House press secretary Jen Psaki praised “constructive” additions to road, bridge and rail spending. She said the White House “remains concerned” about Republicans’ proposed spending on modernizing railways and transitioning to clean energy, along with the party’s calls to pay for infrastructure with previously passed coronavirus relief funds.

The White House has said it expects nearly all of the aid money to be spent. Redirecting the funds could jeopardize support for small businesses and hospitals, Psaki said.

Despite the lingering differences, the sides expect to continue talks. Biden could meet again with Sen. Shelley Moore Capito, the West Virginia Republican leading negotiations with the White House, as soon as next week.

The parties will have to work through two huge disagreements to strike a deal. First, they have disparate visions of what counts as infrastructure.

The White House wants to include programs such as care for elderly and disabled Americans, which it calls vital for putting Americans back to work and boosting the economy. Republicans want to limit the legislation to areas including transportation, broadband and water.

Biden and Republicans could also struggle to find a compromise on how to pay for the infrastructure plan. The president wants to hike the corporate tax rate to at least 25% — and crack down on corporate tax avoidance overseas and individual tax underpayment at home — to offset the spending.

The GOP has said it will not support changes to its 2017 tax cuts as part of an infrastructure bill. The party slashed the corporate rate to 21% from 35%.

It is unclear how much longer talks will go on if Democrats and Republicans cannot strike a deal. On Thursday, Capito said Republicans “continue to negotiate in good faith.”

In his letter, Schumer noted that he was “encouraged” by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee advancing a roughly $300 billion bipartisan surface transportation bill this week.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Kentucky Republican who previously said he would work to fight Biden’s broader economic agenda, said Thursday that his party would continue to engage with the president.

“We’d like to get an outcome on a significant infrastructure package,” he told CNBC.

Democrats passed Biden’s first big-ticket bill, a $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief plan, without a Republican vote in March.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Politics

Texas Republicans Finalize One of many Nation’s Strictest Voting Payments

Republican state lawmakers have often cited voters’ worries about election fraud — fears stoked by Mr. Trump, other Republicans and the conservative media — to justify new voting restrictions, despite the fact that there has been no evidence of widespread fraud in recent American elections.

And in their election push, Republicans have powered past the objections of Democrats, voting rights groups and major corporations. Companies like American Airlines, Dell Technologies and Microsoft spoke out against the Texas Legislation soon after the bill was introduced, but the pressure has been largely ineffective so far.

The final 67-page bill, known as S.B. 7, proved to be an amalgamation of two omnibus voting bills that had worked their way through the state’s Legislature. It included many of the provisions originally introduced by Republicans, but lawmakers dropped some of the most stringent ones, like a regulation on the allocation of voting machines that would have led to the closure of polling places in communities of color and a measure that would have permitted partisan poll watchers to record the voting process on video.

Still, the bill includes a provision that could make overturning an election easier. Previously, Texas election law had stated that reversing the results of an election because of fraud accusations required proving that illicit votes had actually resulted in a wrongful victory. If the bill passes, the number of fraudulent votes required to do so would simply need to be equal to the winning vote differential; it would not matter for whom the fraudulent votes had been cast.

Democrats and voting rights groups were quick to condemn the bill.

“S.B. 7 is a ruthless piece of legislation,” said Sarah Labowitz, the policy and advocacy director at the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas. “It targets voters of color and voters with disabilities, in a state that’s already the most difficult place to vote in the country.”

But Republicans celebrated the proposed law, and bristled at the criticism from Mr. Biden and others.

“As the White House and national Democrats work together to minimize election integrity, the Texas Legislature continues to fight for accessible and secure elections,” State Senator Bryan Hughes, one of the bill’s sponsors, said in a statement. “In Texas, we do not bend to headlines, corporate virtue signaling, or suppression of election integrity, even if it comes from the president of the United States.”

Categories
Politics

Pentagon asks for $715 billion in 2022 Protection finances

An F / A-18 Hornet aircraft sits on the airline line while a wall of fire behind it explodes during an air show at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar, Calif., On October 3, 2010.

Lance Cpl. Jamean Berry | US Marine Corps

WASHINGTON – The Department of Defense is asking Congress for $ 715 billion in its fiscal 2022 budget, an increase of about $ 10 billion over what was allocated to the Pentagon in fiscal 2021.

The White House on Friday released the general details of President Joe Biden’s budget proposal for the fiscal year beginning October 1, which targets a whopping $ 753 billion for national defense.

The Pentagon’s $ 715 billion share of the budget will fund weapons programs and key national security priorities, while an additional $ 38 billion will be used for defense programs at the Department of Energy and other federal agencies, bringing the total to defense spending totaling $ 753 billion. Dollar.

The nearly 2% increase in defense spending is due to the Biden administration pulling the nation out of the U.S. military’s longest war and shifting focus away from the Middle East to address the emerging threats from China.

“The division in this budget has a clear view of Beijing and provides the investment to prioritize China as our pace challenge,” Deputy Secretary of Defense Kathleen Hicks told reporters on Friday. “The PRC has become increasingly competitive in the Indo-Pacific region and around the world. It has the economic, military and technological capabilities to challenge the international system and American interests within it,” she added.

The Pentagon is calling for $ 5.1 billion for its Pacific deterrent initiative to counter threats emanating from China.

“At the same time, we have to deal with advanced and persistent threats from Russia, Iran, North Korea and other non-state and transnational factors,” said Hicks.

The Pentagon’s proposed budget includes more than $ 500 million for Covid-19 and pandemic preparation. largest investment in research, development and technology to date, at $ 112 billion; and $ 617 million to combat, prepare and adapt to climate change.

The budget also includes a 2.7% pay increase for troops and civil defense personnel.

Here is a breakdown of some of the major weapons programs the Pentagon is looking to add to its arsenal.

plane

A Naval Airman with Marine Fighter Attack Training Squadron 501 flies an F-35 over North Carolina during air refueling training April 14, 2015.

Cpl. Unique Roberts | US Marine Corps

The Pentagon is asking for $ 52.4 billion to invest in the military’s air domain. The Department of Defense plans to use $ 12 billion to purchase 85 F-35 Joint Strike Fighters. The F-35 is Lockheed Martin’s largest program and the most expensive weapon system in the world.

Other important investments:

  • 14 Boeing KC-46 tankers: $ 2.5 billion
  • 9 Lockheed Martin CH-53K King Stallion helicopters: $ 1.7 billion
  • 12 Boeing F-15EX fighter jets: $ 1.5 billion
  • 30 Apache Boeing AH-64E attack helicopters: $ 825 million

Ships

The aircraft carrier USS Harry Truman will cross the Arabian Sea on January 31, 2020.

Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class Scott Swofford | US Navy

The Pentagon wants $ 34.6 billion to grow and modernize the Navy’s combat fleet. The Department of Defense is also calling for an unmanned surface vehicle to diversify the Navy’s capabilities.

Other important investments:

  • 1 General Dynamics Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine: $ 5 billion
  • 2 General Dynamics Virginia-class rapid attack submarines: $ 6.9 billion
  • 1 General Dynamics Arleigh Burke-class destroyer: $ 2.4 billion
  • 1 frigate FFG (X) frigate: $ 1.3 billion
  • 1 Huntington Ingalls Ford-class aircraft carrier: $ 2.9 billion
  • Unmanned surface craft: $ 203 million

vehicles

U.S. Marines with the 3rd Marine Division, III Marine Expeditionary Force position their amphibious assault vehicles on the beach during an amphibious raid drill with Royal Thai Marines on June 10, 2013 in Hat Yao, Thailand.

Cpl. John Lamb | US Marine Corps

The Pentagon calls for $ 12.3 billion for ground combat systems. The request includes upgrades and modifications for 70 rugged M1 Abrams tanks for $ 1 billion.

Other important investments:

  • 3,799 common light tactical vehicles for a variety of missions: $ 1.1 billion
  • 92 amphibious combat vehicles for use throughout the U.S. Marine Corps: $ 613 million

Cybersecurity and IT

The Pentagon is demanding $ 10.4 billion for its cyber efforts, including protecting the Department of Defense’s networks.

Last year, software from IT company SolarWinds was breached, allowing hackers to access communications and data in multiple government agencies.

In April, Washington officially made the Russian foreign intelligence service responsible for carrying out the SolarWinds cyberattack. Microsoft President Brad Smith described the incident as “the largest and most sophisticated attack the world has ever seen”. Microsoft’s systems were also infected with malicious software.

The Russian government denies all allegations behind the SolarWinds hack.

Earlier this month, the Colonial Pipeline was the victim of a widespread cyberattack that forced the company to shut down approximately 5,500 miles of pipeline, cutting off half fuel supplies on the east coast and gasoline shortages in the southeast.

On Thursday, Microsoft warned in a blog post that the Russian hackers believed to be behind the catastrophic SolarWinds attack had launched another attack.

The hacking group known as Nobelium has targeted more than 150 organizations worldwide in the past week, including government agencies, think tanks and non-governmental organizations. The cyber attack is the latest example of criminal groups or state actors exploiting US cyber vulnerabilities.

“With solar winds and other episodes of hacking into US data networks, it makes sense to invest more in cybersecurity, but the Pentagon will not necessarily be the main player in addressing broader cyber challenges for infrastructure, power, communications, and banking systems.” said William Hartung, director of the weapons and security program at the Center for International Politics.

“Partnership with the private sector and federal rules on the path to cybersecurity could also or more importantly be to prevent cyber risks,” he added.

Missile defense

A U.S. Air Force Minuteman III unarmed ICBM launches during an operational test May 3, 2017 at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California.

Aviator 1st class Daniel Brosam | US Air Force

The Pentagon wants $ 20.4 billion for the further development of its multi-layer missile defense system.

“The company finally seems to be moving towards a new vision of missile defense, manifested in new efforts in space sensors, hypersonic and cruise missile defense, and other next-generation technologies,” said Thomas Karako, director of the missile defense project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, when asked about the budget for missile defense.

“Hypersonic defense will be a challenging, complex form of air defense, but it is possible and that is where the threat has arrived,” added Karako.

Other important investments:

  • Sea Interceptors (SM-3 IIA and SM-3 IB): $ 647 million
  • Sea-based Ballistic Missile Defense System, or AEGIS BMD: $ 1 billion
  • Ground-Based Middle Way and Enhanced Next Generation Homeland Security / Interceptor (NGI): $ 1.7 billion
  • Terminal High Altitude Area Defense, or THAAD System: $ 562 million
  • Patriot Advanced Capability Missile Segment Improvement: $ 777 million

place

The 45th Space Wing successfully launches a United Launch Alliance Atlas V rocket for the U.S. Navy that lifted from Space Launch Complex-41 on July 9, 2013 at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida.

Pat Corkery | via the US Air Force

The Pentagon is calling for $ 20.6 billion to invest in the emerging security environment in space. The Department of Defense plans to spend 1.7 billion US dollars on five launchers and the Rocket System Launch Program (RSLP).

Other important investments:

  • Global Positioning System (GPS) Company: $ 1.8 billion
  • Space-based Overhead Persistent Infrared (OPIR) systems: $ 2.6 billion