Categories
Politics

Gov. Gavin Newsom’s Recall Election Set for Sept. 14.

The Republican-led, pandemic-fueled campaign to recall California Governor Gavin Newsom received an official election date Thursday when the state lieutenant governor announced that voters would vote on the matter on September 14.

The date, just 75 days away and the earliest that district officials said they could manage to hold a special election, was released shortly after the California Secretary of State officially confirmed the recall request. And it came after Mr Newsom’s Democrats in the state legislature decided to speed up the process.

California is overwhelmingly Democratic and Mr Newsom is widely expected to get his way, especially as the state is out of the coronavirus crisis. The common wisdom of his advisors and allies was that he would benefit from a quick decision while Californians still bask in relief from the state’s economy reopening and before the fall forest fire season begins.

The schedule, put forward by another Democrat, Lt. Gov. Eleni Kounalakis, also severely restricts the ability of potential challengers to take part in the vote, leaving them only about two weeks to compete in the race to succeed Mr. Newsom. More than 50 candidates are already on the ballot, and a handful of wealthy Republicans are campaigning seriously.

The special election is expected to cost about $ 276 million and marks the second time in the state’s history that Californians have voted on the removal of an incumbent governor. The first led to the removal of Gray Davis and the election of Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2003.

Mr Newsom and his supporters, who mocked the recall as the final act of right-wing extremist relevance, said Thursday that they applauded voters’ decision.

“This Republican recall is a bare attempt by Trump Republicans to take control of California – fueled by the same Republicans who refused to accept the presidential election results,” said Juan Rodriguez, head of the governor’s campaign organization.

Kevin Faulconer, former San Diego mayor and a Republican candidate, countered that “this movement is being driven by Californians from every community – Democrats, Republicans and Independents.”

Mr. Faulconer added, “Change is coming for California and retirement is coming for Gavin Newsom.”

Recall attempts are not uncommon in California, with every governor since 1960 faced with at least one. But getting a recall on the ballot is rare.

The campaign against Mr Newsom languished for months before a string of pandemic-induced missteps, court decisions and voter anger sent the governor – a liberal in a democratic state who was landslide-elected in 2018 – into a perfect political storm.

Categories
Politics

Trump Group schemed to dodge taxes, indictment costs

The Trump Organization and its Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg pleaded not guilty Thursday to crimes related to what prosecutors called a “sweeping and audacious” scheme since 2005 to avoid taxes on compensation for the CFO and other executives of the company owned by ex-President Donald Trump.

The 15-count indictment, which was broader in scope than many legal observers expected, is the first set of criminal charges to emerge from probes of Trump and his company by the Manhattan District Attorney’s office and the New York state Attorney General’s office. Those investigations are continuing.

The indictment says the Trump Organization and Weisselberg devised the scheme to compensate Weisselberg and other company executives in an “off the books” manner, allowing them to receive “substantial portions of their income through indirect and disguised means.”

Weisselberg, 73, had the rent, utilities and garage expenses for his apartment on Manhattan’s Upper West Side paid for by the Trump Organization, without that compensation being reported to tax authorities, and without paying related taxes, the indictment says.

He also received from the company Mercedes-Benz cars for him and his wife, private school tuition for two grandchildren, unreported cash to be used for holiday gratuities and other benefits, all of which were hidden from tax authorities, the indictment said.

In all, Weisselberg alone received about $1.76 million worth of “indirect compensation,” the indictment said.

He thus evaded paying more than $900,000 in taxes that he should have paid, and received more than $136,000 in falsely claimed refunds, according to the indictment, which was issued by a special grand jury in Manhattan.

A prosecutor said in court that the “the former CEO” of the Trump Organization — ex-President Trump — “signed, himself, many of the illegal compensation checks” to executives.

Trump has not been criminally charged.

The scheme “was orchestrated by the most senior executives, who were financially benefitting themselves, by getting secret pay raises at the expense of state and federal taxpayers,” said Carey Dunne, the prosecutor from DA Cyrus Vance Jr.’s office, during the defendants’ arraignment in Manhattan Supreme Court.

The indictment says that Weisselberg and the company also schemed to “conceal his status as a New York City resident and enabled Weisselberg to avoid the payment of New York City income taxes.”

Weisselberg, who has worked for the Trump family for 48 years, for much of the scheme’s time frame had another residence on Long Island, New York. But the indictment says that since 2005, he “spent most of his days in New York City,” which would make him a city resident for tax purposes.

The indictment also says that the Trump Organization maintained internal spreadsheets to track the value of the compensation paid to Weisselberg and others, which was not disclosed to either the IRS, or to New York state and city tax authorities.

The indictment refers to conduct by an unindicted co-conspirator who participated in the scheme. That person is not Trump himself, according to NBC News, which cited a law-enforcement official.

Weisselberg, who surrendered to the DA’s office early Thursday morning, was taken into the courtroom in handcuffs by authorities while wearing a white mask.

Weisselberg’s attorney told a judge that the defense team objected to the prosecution’s claims.

Vance and James were both in court during the hearing. A judge ordered the parties back to court on September 20 for a status conference.

Last year, Vance won a legal battle that allowed him to obtain years’ worth of ex-President Trump’s tax records and other financial documents from his long-time accounting firm.

Allen Weisselberg, chief financial officer of Trump Organization Inc., center, walks towards a courtroom at criminal court in New York, U.S., on Thursday, July 1, 2021.

Stephanie Keith | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Dunne during the hearing said that — contrary to the claims of Trump himself — the alleged scheme was not a “standard practice in the business community.

“This case is not about politics, this investigation, which is ongoing, is proper,” Dunne said.

Dunne also said that “contrary to the defense assertions, there’s no clearer example of a company that should be held to criminal account.”

The Trump Organization and related entities were charged with Weisselberg with a scheme to defraud in the first degree, fourth-degree conspiracy, criminal tax fraud in the third- and fourth-degree, and falsifying business records.

Weisselberg is also charged with second-degree grand larceny.

He was released without bail after being ordered to surrender his passport and told to clear any foreign travel plans with a judge.

A lawyer for the Trump Organization entered a not guilty plea on behalf of the company, which faces fines if convicted.

New York Attorney General Letitia James, said, “Today is an important marker in the ongoing criminal investigation of the Trump Organization and its CFO, Allen Weisselberg.”

“In the indictment, we allege, among other things, financial wrongdoing whereby the Trump Organization engaged in a scheme with Mr. Weisselberg to avoid paying taxes on certain compensation,” James said.

“This investigation will continue, and we will follow the facts and the law wherever they may lead.”

Trump’s former personal lawyer Michael Cohen has repeatedly met with Vance’s investigators to assist them with their probe.

Weisselberg’s former daughter-in-law Jennifer Weisselberg also has given prosecutors information.

Her lawyer Duncan Levin, said, “We have been working with prosecutors for many months now as part of this tax and financial investigation and have provided a large volume of evidence that allowed them to bring these charges.

“We are gratified to hear that the DA’s office is moving forward with a criminal case,” Levin said.

Cyrus Roberts Vance Jr. District Attorney of New York County and New York State Attorney General Letitia James arrive in court for the hearing of Allen Weisselberg, former US President Donald Trumps company chief financial officer at the criminal court in lower Manhattan in New York on July 1, 2021.

Timothy A. Clary | AFP | Getty Images

Jennifer’s ex-husband Barry Weisselberg works for the Trump Organization. The indictment reflects Jennifer’s claims that Barry lived rent-free in a Central Park South apartment owned by the Trump Organization for years.

Barry Weisselberg was not charged in the indictment, which did not identify him by name as the recipient of the rent-free apartment.

But the indictment said, “The value of the lodging provided to [Allen] Weisselberg’s family member constituted income to that family member, and the defendants were required to report that income and to pa withholding taxes on it to federal, state and local tax authorities.”

“The defendants intentionally failed to do so.” 

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

Ex-President Trump, in a statement, said, “The political Witch Hunt by the Radical Left Democrats, with New York now taking over the assignment, continues. It is dividing our Country like never before!”

“Do people see the Radical Left prosecutors, and what they are trying to do to 75M+++ Voters and Patriots, for what it is?” Trump said in a later statement.

Outside of court after the arraignment, Trump Organization lawyer Alan Futerfas, told reporters, “The allegations in the indictment are just that, they are allegations.”

“These charges are going to be vigorously contested,” Futerfas said.

Futerfas also said that the charges were “unprecedented,” and typically would not have been brought by the IRS or other authorities. He said he believed the indictment was filed because of political reasons.

“If the name of the company was something else, I don’t think these charges would’ve been brought. In fact, I’m fairly certain,” he said.

The Trump Organization, in a statement released after the arraignment, said, “After years of investigating, dozens of subpoenas, millions of documents and millions of dollars of taxpayer money, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office has decided to charge select Trump entities with providing a car, an apartment and other employee benefits to one of its long-time executives.”

“Make no mistake – this is not about the law; this is all about politics,” a spokesperson for the company said.

“Legal experts across the country all agree: never before has this District Attorney’s office, or even the IRS, criminally charged a company over employee benefits.”

“Indeed, the District Attorney’s office did not even prosecute a single Wall Street bank for causing the 2008 financial crash – the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression – even though their actions hurt millions around the globe and nearly brought the U.S. economy to the brink of collapse,” the spokesperson said.

Categories
Politics

Britney Spears’s Case Leads Senators to Query Conservatorships

Democratic Senators Elizabeth Warren and Bob Casey are calling on federal agencies to step up oversight of the country’s conservatory systems after pop star Britney Spears testified that she was molested under her conservatory government.

The Senators wrote to Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health, and Merrick Garland, Attorney General, calling for more data on conservatories in the United States and how their agencies interact with state programs within the next two weeks. The move could signal the start of a legislative effort to reform the system.

“MS. The Spears case highlighted long-standing concerns of attorneys who have highlighted the potential for financial and civil rights violations by those under guardianship or supervision,” wrote Ms. Warren of Massachusetts and Mr. Casey of Pennsylvania.

The senators also highlighted previous efforts to study and reform the conservatory system that they felt had fallen short.

Ms. Warren, in a separate statement, described a system with “longstanding loopholes that can deprive people of their fundamental rights”.

“Both HHS and the Department of Justice (DOJ) have previously provided federal support for guardianship reforms and established national coverage regarding older Americans,” she said. “But the lack of federal data on the diffusion of conservatories and guardians of all kinds has made policy changes difficult.”

The National Center for State Courts estimates that there are 1.3 million active conservatories in the United States that oversee assets of at least $ 50 billion, but the group notes that the estimate is based on a “handful” of states which provide reasonably reliable data on conservatories. Each state maintains its own system of conservatories, and data collection varies widely from state to state.

In particular, the senators pointed to a lack of data on the potential for discrimination in the care system on the basis of “race and ethnicity, age, gender, gender identity, sexual orientation and type of disability of persons subject to guardianship”.

This assessment is supported by independent government agencies who have studied conservatories. A 2016 report by the Government Accountability Office found that “the extent of abuse of the elderly by guardians is unknown at the national level”. The National Disability Council said in 2018 that it “cannot say for sure whether guardianship is a growing trend or whether its popularity is decreasing,” adding that the lack of data makes it difficult to recommend policy changes.

Ms. Spears told a judge in Los Angeles last week that she was drugged, forced to work against her will and prevented from removing a contraceptive during her 13-year conservatory career.

On Thursday, an asset management firm that would become co-restorers of Ms. Spears’ estate requested to withdraw from the agreement. In its inquiry to the court, the company said it had been told that Ms. Spears’ conservatory activity was voluntary.

James P. Spears, Ms. Spears’ father who oversees the singer’s finances, called for an investigation into her claims. His attorneys have requested an evidence hearing and questioned the actions of both Ms. Spears’ current personal curator, who replaced Mr. Spears in the position in 2019, and her court-appointed attorney.

Categories
Politics

Trump Group CFO Allen Weisselberg will plead not responsible on indictment

Allen Weisselberg, Chief Financial Officer of the Trump Organization, surrendered to the Manhattan prosecutor on Thursday morning over an indictment that also accused ex-President Donald Trump of doing business.

Weißelberg, who served Trump as a loyal executive officer for decades, is likely to face criminal charges later in a state court that NBC News reported was related to ancillary benefits from the Trump organization. At about the same time, the indictment is unsealed.

The Trump organization is represented in the court proceedings by a lawyer.

Although the Trump organization is being charged as a company in the case, Trump himself is not being charged personally. The company faces possible fines and other sanctions if convicted.

Weisselberg 73, walked into the Lower Manhattan attorney’s office at 6:17 a.m. to handle the case.

His lawyers, Mary Mulligan and Bryan Skarlatos, said in a statement: “Mr. Weisselberg intends to plead not guilty and will address these allegations in court.”

The indictment was brought up on Wednesday by a grand jury at the behest of the prosecutor and New York attorney general Letitia James.

Prosecutor Cyrus Vance Jr. refused to comment on the case as he passed reporters asking if he had anything to say.

“Just good morning and I’ll see you at 2:15,” Vance said, referring to the probable time of the indictment.

Allen Weisselberg, CFO of the Trump Organization.

Timothy A. Clary | AFP | Getty Images

Shortly after Weisselberg’s surrender, the Trump organization blew up Vance.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

“Allen Weisselberg is a loving and devoted husband, father and grandfather who worked for the Trump organization for 48 years,” a company spokesman said in a statement.

“He is now being used by the Manhattan District Attorney as a pawn in a scorched earth attempt to harm the former president,” the spokesman said.

“The district attorney is bringing a criminal prosecution with employee benefits that neither the IRS nor any other district attorney would ever think of. This is not justice, this is politics.”

Vance’s office has been investigating the Trump organization on various issues for several years.

Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance arrives at the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office in New York, United States, on Thursday, July 1, 2021.

Mark Kauzlarich | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Categories
Politics

Trump Group and High Government Are Indicted in Tax Investigation

After raising their sons on Long Island, Mr. Weisselberg and his wife moved into a Trump-branded building on Manhattan’s West Side, where they lived rent-free for years. He bought a home in South Florida, not far from Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, and traveled there and back on weekends on Mr. Trump’s jet. His older son, Barry, went to work for the company managing Wollman Rink in Central Park and acted as the D.J. for Mr. Trump’s Christmas parties, where Allen Weisselberg let loose on the dance floor, according to people who attended. In 2004, Mr. Weisselberg appeared in an episode of “The Apprentice,” Mr. Trump’s reality television show.

“They are like Batman and Robin,” said Barry Weisselberg’s ex-wife, Jennifer, who has aided Mr. Vance’s investigation after a contentious divorce. “They’re a team. They’re not best friends. They don’t spend all their time together, but the world became so insular for Allen that he did not know anything else.”

Mr. Weisselberg had become so woven into the fabric of the Trump Organization that when Mr. Trump moved into the White House in 2017, he entrusted Mr. Weisselberg, along with the former president’s adult sons, with running his company. His earnings reflected his importance: Between 2007 and 2017, his total pay averaged nearly $800,000 a year; in 2018, he earned more than $977,000 in salary and deferred compensation, according to tax return data obtained by The New York Times as part of an investigation published last year.

A lawyer for Mr. Weisselberg, Mary E. Mulligan, declined to comment. A lawyer for the Trump Organization could not immediately be reached for comment.

Even before the indictment, Mr. Weisselberg had in recent years been drawn publicly into Mr. Trump’s controversies and scandals, including investigations over the misuse of charitable funds by the Donald J. Trump Foundation and payments to women on Mr. Trump’s behalf to buy their silence about affairs they said they had with Mr. Trump.

Mr. Trump’s former lawyer, Michael D. Cohen, testified in Congress that Mr. Weisselberg had helped orchestrate a cover-up to reimburse him for a $130,000 payment to the adult film actress Stormy Daniels, and that together they had concocted phony valuations of the company’s real estate holdings to suit Mr. Trump’s needs at any given moment.

Categories
Politics

Trump Group expects to be charged Manhattan DA case

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

A spokesman for DA Cyrus Vance Jr. has repeatedly declined to comment on the investigation or the timing of possible charges.

Ronald Fischetti, a Trump organization attorney and company spokesman, did not immediately respond to requests from CNBC for comment.

If the Trump organization is convicted of a crime, the company could face fines or behavioral restrictions.

Fischetti told CNBC last week, “In my 50+ years of practice, I’ve never seen prosecutors target a company for employee compensation or fringe benefits.”

“The IRS did not want to and did not file such a case,” said the attorney. “Even the financial institutions that caused the 2008 financial crisis, the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, have not been prosecuted.”

Fischetti also confirmed the likelihood of criminal charges against the company last week.

“It looks like they’re going to bring charges against the company, and that’s totally outrageous,” Fischetti told NBC News at the time.

“They couldn’t get Allen Weisselberg to cooperate and tell them what they wanted to hear and so they are going to pursue these allegations and they couldn’t get him to cooperate because he wouldn’t say that Donald Trump knew or Had information he “may not have properly deducted the use of cars or an apartment.”

Categories
Politics

The place Will the Home Inquiry on the Capitol Riot Go?

The Justice Department is aggressively trying to bring perpetrators of the Capitol Riot to justice, and more than 500 people have been arrested in connection with the January 6 attack.

But no full investigation had opened on Capitol Hill as of Wednesday after the Senate Republicans repulsed an attempt last month to set up a bipartisan commission.

That changed on Wednesday afternoon when the House of Representatives voted 222-190 to set up a special committee that will conduct an extensive investigation into the January 6th events and their causes. Only two Republicans joined an almost united Democratic faction. With the investigation having no end date and effectively under the aegis of Spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi and her party, attempts by Republicans to prevent a major investigation into the insurrection could lead to a more aggressive, painful and lengthy investigation.

Conservative commentators have tried to downplay the severity of the attack since the day it happened, but as a new 40-minute video from The Times of the Capitol riot shows, it’s hard to take it as anything other than one Attempt the workings of American democracy. Many of the rioters featured in the video arrived in Washington to confront, as the investigation shows, and they saw themselves as the president’s specific commandments.

When the House voted today, Ms. Pelosi had invited several officers injured in the attack to watch the proceedings from her box in the gallery of the house. These included Harry Dunn of the Capitol Police and two District of Columbia cops: Michael Fanone, who stood up for the Republicans to support an investigation, and Daniel Hodges, who was crushed in a doorway during the rampage. Relatives of Brian Sicknick, a Capitol cop who died after clashing with the rioters, were to join them.

Luke Broadwater, a congressional reporter, covered today’s House vote. I met him for a side talk about how the committee is likely to work and whether it could pose a threat to the Republicans.

House Democrats voted today to set up a special committee to investigate the January 6 attack on the Capitol. Give us an overview of how this committee will work and what it will examine. What will it – and will not – be empowered to do?

The Special Committee will have a full mandate to “investigate and report on the facts, circumstances and causes relating to the domestic terrorist attack on the United States Capitol Complex of January 6, 2021,” according to laws passed by the House of Representatives today. In particular, she is tasked with investigating law enforcement failures such as information gathering and the causes that led so many to turn violent, online platforms and potential “malicious foreign interference”.

We do not yet know all about how the committee will work, as its members have not yet been named. But there are still a number of unanswered questions about the attack, and the Democrats in particular want to know more about the role President Donald Trump played that day and any connections between those around Trump, the planners of the rally, the mob – Preceded violence, investigate, and right-wing groups.

What role should Republicans play on this special committee?

That is so far unclear. Most Republicans opposed the establishment of the select committee, but Rep. Kevin McCarthy, Republican leader of the House of Representatives, has five appointments to the panel with the approval of Speaker Nancy Pelosis.

Pelosi has also hinted that she could appoint a Republican to the committee herself. There is much speculation that it could be Wyoming MP Liz Cheney, the daughter of a former Republican vice president who harshly criticized Trump and his actions on Jan. 6. There are some other options too, such as Rep. Adam Kinzinger, Republican from Illinois, who urged his colleagues to leave Trump after the party lost the White House and both houses of Congress during his chaotic tenure as president.

GOP leaders avoided reopening the January 6 attack, and some said a recent Senate investigation into police neglect that day should be enough. But Polls show that a vast majority of Americans disagree. Do Republicans fear that rejecting a bipartisan investigation into the causes of the attack could hurt their standing with voters ahead of the 2022 midterm elections?

I would say a lot of Republicans I’ve spoken to in Congress think January 6th was a terrible and dark day in American history. There are people in the party who clearly deny that they have said some crazy things, but many believe that attacks on police officers and burglaries should be condemned.

However, they believe another Jan 6th review is a losing issue for their party. They know it was Trump supporters who committed the violence, and they know it was horrific, and they know that every day that is spent talking about January 6th gives Democrats a political one Gives advantage. Hoping to win back the House of Representatives in 2022, Republicans hope to shift public discussion to issues in the Biden administration, such as problems on the southern border or monetary inflation, rather than the violence perpetrated by Republican presidents’ supporters. as she tries to stop the peaceful transfer of power.

On the other hand, how much do the Democrats see this special committee as a crucial opportunity to clearly justify Trump’s role in inciting violence on Jan. 6, especially since he did wades back into the political battle before 2022?

The Democrats thought they had a clear case for Trump instigating the riot when they indict him a second time after the attack. However, the special committee will give them the opportunity to gather more evidence and interview more witnesses about the siege and Trump’s role in it.

Unlike the independent bipartisan commission that blocked Republicans in the Senate in May and should have finished its work this year, the special committee has the power to investigate with no end date until it finishes its report. That means it could potentially hold hearings and issue reports throughout the 2022 – or even 2024 – campaign cycle, potentially ensuring that voters are often reminded of the horrors of the day.

On Politics is also available as a newsletter. Sign up here to receive it in your inbox.

Is there something you think we are missing? Would you like to see more? We’d love to hear from you. Send us an email at onpolitics@nytimes.com.

Categories
Politics

Home approves choose committee to analyze pro-Trump Capitol rebel

A supporter of U.S. President Donald Trump sprays smoke during a “Stop the Steal” protest outside of the Capitol building in Washington D.C. January 6, 2021.

Stephanie Keith | Reuters

The House passed legislation Wednesday that will form a select committee to investigate the violent Jan. 6 riot in which Donald Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol. 

The measure passed in a 222-190 party-line vote. Only two Republicans, Reps. Adam Kinzinger, R-I.L., and Liz Cheney, R-W.Y., voted in favor of it.

 “We have the duty, to the Constitution and the Country, to find the truth of the January 6th Insurrection and to ensure that such an assault on our Democracy cannot happen again,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wrote in a letter to House members Wednesday morning. 

Pelosi announced the legislation after Senate Republicans blocked a bill in May that would have created an independent and bipartisan commission, modeled after the 9/11 commission, to probe the attack. GOP leaders asserted that it would only duplicate existing investigation efforts by the Justice Department and congressional committees. 

Under the newly approved legislation, the select committee will be led by Democrats and consist of 13 members. Pelosi will appoint one chairperson and all members to the committee, 5 of whom will be appointed in consultation with Republican House minority leader Kevin McCarthy, according to the legislation.  

The committee will investigate and report the facts and causes of the event, such as activities of intelligence and law enforcement agencies and technological factors that may have motivated the attack, the legislation says. It will also develop recommendations to prevent similar events from occurring in the future. 

All findings, conclusions and recommendations made by the committee will be issued in a final report to the House, according to the legislation. 

“Will we investigate how our democracy was attacked or will we send a green light to allow it to be attacked again? Will we stand with the cops or roll with the cop killers? Do we want the truth, or will we allow history to be erased? And are we for the constitution or are we for chaos?,” Representative Eric Swalwell said on the House floor.  

“January 6 was a crime against our democracy and the heroes of this Capitol. Now we must investigate it. Failing that, we are lawless. And lost.”

Rep. Michelle Fischbach, R-M.N., urged Republicans not to vote for the legislation, stating that it is “rife with partisan politics at its worst.”

A mob of Trump supporters stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 in an effort to thwart Congress’ confirmation of President Joe Biden’s electoral victory. The attack left five people dead, including Capitol police officer Brian Sicknick. 

Pelosi invited Capitol Police Officer Harry Dunn and Metropolitan Police Officers Michael Fanone and Daniel Hodges to sit in during the House debate and vote. Gladys Sicknick, the mother of the police officer who died, was expected to attend as well. 

Police officers who responded at the Capitol and Gladys Sicknick have all lobbied for the independent select committee, the Associated Press reported Friday. 

Fanone and Dunn met with McCarthy last Friday, asking him to publicly condemn statements made by GOP members who have downplayed the attack and voted against honoring police for defending the Capitol, according to the Associated Press. 

Dunn, who had fought the rioters in hand-to-hand combat and was subject to racial slurs, told the Associated Press after the meeting that the goal is “accountability, justice for everybody that was involved.”

Fanone, who had described being shocked with a stun gun and beaten by rioters, added that he asked McCarthy not to put “the wrong people” on the select committee.

Categories
Politics

State Dept. Modifications Coverage for Passport Gender Identification

Americans are allowed to use their self-identified gender on their U.S. passports without presenting medical documents, under a new State Department rule announced by officials on Wednesday, the last day of Pride Month.

The shift was the first step in creating gender tagging on U.S. passports and citizenship certificates for individuals who identify as non-binary, intersex, or who otherwise do not conform to gender roles. This process is complex and will take time, said an official who spoke on condition of anonymity prior to Foreign Minister Antony J. Blinken’s announcement.

In the meantime, officials said, Americans who apply for a passport and proof of citizenship abroad will no longer be required to provide a medical certificate if their stated gender does not match their other identification documents.

The move fulfills an election promise made by President Biden, who has raised concerns that transgender and non-binary people without documented evidence of their self-identified gender are at risk of denial of employment, housing and other benefits, including the right to vote.

Blinken was expected to announce that the new policy will follow other countries that have taken similar steps – including Canada, Australia, Argentina, Nepal and New Zealand – to align in part with foreign allies and partners.

Currently, the State Department requires a medical certificate stating that a passport applicant has either moved or is in the process of changing their gender on official consular documents. It was not immediately clear on Wednesday when this requirement would no longer apply.

Last month the State Department reversed another policy that had disproportionately affected LGBTQ families and granted foreign-born babies US citizenship to married couples with at least one American parent, regardless of which parent was biological with the child was related.

This policy, a victory for same-sex couples, effectively guaranteed that American and binational couples who use assisted reproductive technology to give birth abroad – such as surrogate motherhood or sperm donation – can pass citizenship on to their children.

Categories
Politics

Biden takes his bipartisan infrastructure deal street present to Wisconsin

U.S. President Joe Biden stops at La Crosse Municipal Transit Utility in La Crosse, Wisconsin, the United States, on Jan.

Kevin Lemarque | Reuters

President Joe Biden traveled to La Crosse, Wisconsin on Tuesday to promote its recently announced bipartisan infrastructure framework of $ 1.2 trillion.

While there, Biden toured the city’s Municipal Transit Utility and made comments focusing on how the massive infrastructure package would benefit Wisconsin residents.

“It’s going to change the world for families here in Wisconsin,” said Biden.

“More than a thousand bridges here in Wisconsin are classified by engineers as structurally deficient,” he said. “A thousand, only in Wisconsin.”

The framework includes $ 579 billion in new spending on roads, bridges, railways, public transportation, electric vehicle systems, electricity, broadband and water.

Biden also promoted rural high-speed broadband expansion, which the deal would fund if Congress passed it.

The deal will “ensure” [high speed broadband] is available in every American household, including the 35% of rural families who currently don’t have it, “said Biden. In Wisconsin, 82,000 children would not have reliable internet access at home.

Biden also drew on familiar lines of how the deal will help the United States win the already ongoing technology and innovation race with China and prove that democracies can do better for people than autocratic systems of government.

Biden’s remarks in Wisconsin preview how he plans to sell the infrastructure contract across the country in the coming weeks, emphasizing how the deal will benefit residents of each state in particular.

His next stop this weekend is Michigan, where Biden will perform with Democratic state governor Gretchen Whitmer.

However, Biden’s seminal La Crosse speech belied the dangerous path ahead for the bipartisan agreement in Congress, where it is still just a framework of a plan on paper and yet to be written into law.

The deal was negotiated last month by a group of ten Senators, five Republicans and five Democrats, and announced last week.

Biden’s suggestion during that announcement that he could veto the framework unless lawmakers pass other democratic priorities as well, briefly threatened the deal.

Over the weekend, the president reassured some Republicans by making it clear that if passed of his own accord, he would sign the bill.

“I was very happy to see the president clarify his remarks because it didn’t match everything we were told along the way,” Senator Rob Portman, R-Ohio, an architect of the plan, told ABC News on Sunday .