Categories
Politics

America Is Present process Seismic Modifications. Its Politics? Hardly.

In another age, the events of this season would have been nearly certain to produce a major shift in American politics — or at least a meaningful, discernible one.

Over a period of weeks, the coronavirus death rate plunged and the country considerably eased public health restrictions. President Biden announced a bipartisan deal late last month to spend hundreds of billions of dollars rebuilding the country’s worn infrastructure — the most significant aisle-crossing legislative agreement in a generation, if it holds together. The Congressional Budget Office estimated on Thursday that the economy was on track to regain all of the jobs it lost during the pandemic by the middle of 2022.

And in a blow to Mr. Biden’s fractious opposition, Donald J. Trump — the dominant figure in Republican politics — faced an embarrassing legal setback just as he was resuming a schedule of campaign-style events. The Manhattan district attorney’s office charged his company, the Trump Organization, and its chief financial officer with “sweeping and audacious” financial crimes.

Not long ago, such a sequence of developments might have tested the partisan boundaries of American politics, startling voters into reconsidering their assumptions about the current president, his predecessor, the two major parties and what government can do for the American people.

These days, it is hard to imagine that such a political turning point is at hand.

“I think we’re open to small moves; I’m not sure we’re open to big moves,” said Mark Mellman, a Democratic pollster. “Partisanship has made our system so sclerotic that it isn’t very responsive to real changes in the real world.”

Amid the mounting drama of the early summer, a moment of truth appears imminent. It is one that will reveal whether the American electorate is still capable of large-scale shifts in opinion, or whether the country is essentially locked into a schism for the foreseeable future, with roughly 53 percent of Americans on one side and 47 percent on the other.

Mr. Biden’s job approval has been steady in the mid-50s for most of the year, as his administration has pushed a shots-and-checks message about beating the virus and reviving the economy. His numbers are weaker on subjects like immigration and crime; Republicans have focused their criticism on those areas accordingly.

This weekend, the president and his allies have mounted something of a celebratory tour for the Fourth of July: Mr. Biden headed to Michigan, one of the vital swing states that made him president, while Vice President Kamala Harris traveled to Las Vegas to mark a revival of the nation’s communal life.

On Friday, Mr. Biden stopped just short of declaring that happy days are here again, but he eagerly brandished the latest employment report showing that the economy added 850,000 jobs in June.

“The last time the economy grew at this rate was in 1984, and Ronald Reagan was telling us it’s morning in America,” Mr. Biden said. “Well, it’s getting close to afternoon here. The sun is coming out.”

Yet there is little confidence in either party that voters are about to swing behind Mr. Biden and his allies en masse, no matter how many events appear to align in his favor.

Democratic strategists see that as no fault of Mr. Biden’s, but merely the frustrating reality of political competition these days: The president — any president — might be able to chip away at voters’ skepticism of his party or their cynicism about Washington, but he cannot engineer a broad realignment in the public mood.

Mr. Mellman said the country’s political divide currently favored Mr. Biden and his party, with a small but stable majority of voters positively disposed toward the president. But even significant governing achievements — containing the coronavirus, passing a major infrastructure bill — may yield only minute adjustments in the electorate, he said.

Updated 

July 2, 2021, 3:38 p.m. ET

“Getting a bipartisan bill passed, in the past, would have been a game changer,” Mr. Mellman said. “Will it be in this environment? I have my doubts.”

Russ Schriefer, a Republican strategist, offered an even blunter assessment of the chances for real movement in the electorate. He said that the receding of the pandemic had helped voters feel better about the direction the country is moving in — “the Covid reopening certainly helps with the right-track numbers” — but that he saw no evidence that it was changing the way they thought about their preferences between the parties.

“I don’t think anything has particularly changed,” Mr. Schriefer said. “If anything, since November people have retreated further and further back into their own corners.”

American voters’ stubborn resistance to external events is no great surprise, of course, to anyone who lived through the 2020 election. Last year, Mr. Trump presided over an out-of-control pandemic that killed hundreds of thousands of people and caused the American economy to collapse. He humiliated the nation’s top public health officials and ridiculed basic safety measures like mask wearing; threatened to crush mass demonstrations with military force; outlined no agenda for his second term; and delivered one of the most self-destructive debate performances of any presidential candidate in modern history.

Mr. Trump still won 47 percent of the vote and carried 25 states. The trench lines of identity-based grievance he spent five years digging and deepening — pitting rural voters against urban ones, working-class voters against voters with college degrees, white voters against everybody else — saved him from an overwhelming repudiation.

A Pew Research Center study of the 2020 election results released this past week showed exactly what scale of voter movement is possible in the political climate of the Trump era and its immediate aftermath.

The electorate is not entirely frozen, but each little shift in one party’s favor seems offset by another small one in the opposite direction. Mr. Trump improved his performance with women and Hispanic voters compared with the 2016 election, while Mr. Biden expanded his party’s support among moderate constituencies like male voters and military veterans.

The forces that made Mr. Trump a resilient foe in 2020 may now shield him from the kind of exile that might normally be inflicted on a toppled former president enveloped in criminal investigations and facing the prospect of financial ruin. Polls show that Mr. Trump has persuaded most of his party’s base to believe a catalog of outlandish lies about the 2020 election; encouraging his admirers to ignore his legal problems is an old trick by comparison.

The divisions Mr. Trump carved into the electoral map are still apparent in other ways, too: Even as the country reopens and approaches the point of declaring victory over the coronavirus, the states lagging furthest behind in their vaccination campaigns are nearly all strongholds of the G.O.P. While Mr. Trump has encouraged his supporters to get vaccinated, his contempt for public health authorities and the culture of vaccine skepticism in the right-wing media has hindered easy progress.

Yet the social fissures that have made Mr. Trump such a durable figure have also cemented Mr. Biden as the head of a majority coalition with broad dominance of the country’s most populous areas. The Democrats do not have an overwhelming electoral majority — and certainly not a majority that can count on overcoming congressional gerrymandering, the red-state bias of the Senate and the traditional advantage for the opposition party in midterm elections — but they have a majority all the same.

And if Mr. Biden’s approach up to this point has been good enough to keep roughly 53 percent of the country solidly with him, it might not take a major political breakthrough — let alone a season of them — to reinforce that coalition by winning over just a small slice of doubters or critics. There are strategists in Mr. Biden’s coalition who hope to do considerably more than that, either by maneuvering the Democratic Party more decisively toward the political center or by competing more assertively with Republicans on themes of economic populism (or perhaps through some combination of the two).

Mr. Biden’s aides have already briefed congressional Democrats several times on their plans to lean hard into promoting the economic recovery as the governing party’s signature achievement — one they hope to reinforce further with a victory on infrastructure.

Faiz Shakir, who managed Senator Bernie Sanders’s 2020 presidential campaign, said Democrats did not need to worry about making deep inroads into Mr. Trump’s base. But if Mr. Biden and his party managed to reclaim a sliver of the working-class community that had recently shifted right, he said, it would make them markedly stronger for 2022 and beyond.

“All you need to focus on is a 5 percent strategy,” Mr. Shakir said. “What 5 percent of this base do you think you can attract back?”

But Mr. Shakir warned that Democrats should not underestimate the passion that Mr. Trump’s party would bring to that fight, or the endurance of the fault lines that he had used to reorganize American politics.

“He has animated people around those social and racial, cultural, cleavages,” Mr. Shakir said of Mr. Trump. “That keeps people enthused. It’s sad but it is the case that that is going on.”

Categories
Politics

Bitcoin ETF ought to have been accredited some time in the past, SEC regulator Peirce says

Hester Peirce, Commissioner for the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Center, listens during a House Financial Services Committee hearing in Washington, DC, the United States, on Tuesday, September 24, 2019.

Andrew Harrer | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Hester Peirce is at a loss.

For years, the Securities and Exchange Commission, of which Peirce is a member, has rejected requests from national stock exchanges and financial companies to list securities that track the performance of the popular digital currency Bitcoin.

Back in the day – let’s say 10 years ago – concerns about possible market manipulation and liquidity might have made sense, but things have changed.

“This is probably the biggest and most frequently asked question I get: When will the SEC approve a Bitcoin publicly traded product?” Commissioner Peirce said in an interview with CNBC on Thursday.

“I thought if we had applied our standards as we applied them to other products, we would have already approved one or more of them,” she said. “With every day that goes by, the rationale we have used in the past for not being approved seems to be weakening.”

The SEC applies a “unique, elevated standard” to filings related to digital assets, it wrote in 2020. And it has argued that the agency is asking exchanges and potential ETF sponsors for assurances beyond what they do for traditional, stock-based demands products.

“People with a regulatory mindset say, ‘Oh wait, the market for Bitcoin looks a little different from the markets we’re used to,'” said Peirce on Thursday.

Now, she added, the Bitcoin market looks more like an established market with more institutional and established retail investors involved.

“So I think the markets have matured quite a bit,” said Peirce.

Renewed demands for a SEC-approved Bitcoin ETF come just weeks after the regulator announced its ruling on approving an application by VanEck to list shares of its Bitcoin Trust on the Chicago Board of Exchange’s BTZ Exchange move.

Regulators said in a letter dated June 16 that they would take additional time to seek comments from the public. In particular, the SEC asks investors and scientists for their opinion on whether Bitcoin ETFs could be susceptible to manipulation or whether Bitcoin itself is sufficiently distributed and therefore resistant to similar underhand manipulation.

But Peirce, a Republican named one of the SEC’s five commissioners by former President Donald Trump, has long denounced what she sees as double standards for Bitcoin products in her own agency.

Perhaps her sharpest objection came in a dissent in 2018, when she argued that the SEC should have approved an application by the Chicago Board of Exchange’s Bats BTZ Exchange to list and trade shares in the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust.

“By excluding the approval of cryptocurrency-based ETPs for the foreseeable future, the Commission is operating a performance regulation,” she wrote at the time. “Bitcoin is a new phenomenon and its long-term viability is uncertain. It can be successful, it can fail. However, the commission is not well positioned to assess the likelihood of either outcome for Bitcoin or other assets. “

Three years later, VanEck’s current filing – much like pending Bitcoin ETF filings from Fidelity, Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest, and a few others – is viewed by the industry as an SEC litmus test now led by a cryptocurrency expert, Chairman Gary Gensler becomes.

Former chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Gary Gensler, testifies at a US Senate Banking Committee hearing on systemic risk and market oversight on Capitol Hill in Washington on May 22, 2012.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

His appointment as head of the SEC by President Joe Biden, and his subsequent Senate confirmation, met with optimism from many in the crypto community as he is seen as a skilled hand in creating novel financial rules.

Gensler, who taught crypto courses at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is perhaps best known for his influential tenure as chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in the Obama administration. There Gensler helped develop and introduce a new supervisory system for the swap market, which was largely unregulated before the financial crisis.

Even if the Democrat Gensler does not necessarily agree with the Trump-appointed Peirce on all issues, they can join a more proactive SEC on Bitcoin regulation.

Rejecting Bitcoin ETF applications not only carries the risk of double standards, it can also provide few, more dangerous alternatives to thousands of investors.

“The Complications of Not Approval [an application] get stronger because people are looking for other ways to do the same things that they would do with an exchange traded product, “she said.” They are looking for other types of products that are not that easy to get in and out of maybe look at companies that are somehow related to bitcoin or crypto in a broader sense. “

Bitcoin itself has taken a violent start to summer and has fainted its price by more than 40% in the past three months. Although it remains one of the most actively traded digital assets, some market watchers say Bitcoin is at a critical juncture.

“It looks like it might be preparing for a $ 30,000 retest, and that could be critical,” Art Cashin, director of NYSE floor operations at UBS, said Thursday. “If you crack $ 30,000, traders will see if there is a trapdoor, a cascade sell-off, to follow.”

Zoom In Icon Arrows pointing outwards

Its dizzying ups and downs even come as a growing number of companies and banks, including payment companies Square and PayPal, began to facilitate Bitcoin transactions.

Meanwhile, the Bank of New York Mellon announced in February that it would start funding Bitcoin, a major development given that it is both the oldest bank in the country and a leader in custody banking.

Late on Friday morning, Bitcoin rose 1.6% to $ 33,550.

Despite the volatile fluctuations in the price of the currency, Peirce remains convinced that a Bitcoin ETF is overdue.

It is not the SEC’s job to approve or deny requests based on the merits of the investment itself, she said Thursday, especially if the exchanges meet legal requirements to protect investors from fraud.

“Bitcoin is so decentralized now. The number of nodes involved in Bitcoin is large and the number of people who have an interest in keeping this work decentralized is very large, ”she said. “People should make their own decisions: if people don’t want to buy bitcoin because they think it’s tampered with, they shouldn’t buy bitcoin.”

Categories
Politics

11 Arrested in Armed Roadside Standoff in Massachusetts

Eleven men were arrested Saturday after a long roadside altercation between Massachusetts police officers and a group of heavily armed men in tactical gear who claimed to be part of a group called Rise of the Moors.

Dozens of police officers from Massachusetts and New Hampshire responded to the standoff that closed part of a freeway for several hours and prompted authorities to order people in the surrounding communities to take protection on the spot.

The men who appeared to be broadcasting the stalemate on YouTube eventually surrendered to police without any shots being fired, authorities said. There were no injuries, although three of the men in the group were hospitalized with pre-existing conditions unrelated to the stalemate.

“I attribute patience, professionalism, and partnership to the successful resolution of this matter,” said Col. Christopher Mason of the Massachusetts State Police. “At the end of the day, we have the desired result, which is a safe solution.”

The stalemate began around 1:30 a.m. on Saturday, according to the State Police, when a state trooper stopped to look for two vehicles that had stopped in the breakdown lane of Interstate 95 in Wakefield, about 15 miles north of Boston. The men filled their gas tanks with their own fuel, and they appeared to be carrying military tactical equipment and rifles and other weapons. Colonel Mason said the men said they were going to Maine from Rhode Island for “training”.

When the men did not produce the required IDs and gun licenses, the soldier asked for reinforcements, Colonel Mason said.

“You can imagine that eleven armed people standing on a freeway at 2am with long guns are sure to raise concerns and are inconsistent with the firearms laws we have here in Massachusetts,” said Colonel Mason. “I understand that you have a different perspective. I appreciate this perspective. I do not agree with this perspective. “

First, two armed men were arrested, Colonel Mason said, and the negotiators spent hours talking to other members of the group, some of whom were in the woods by the highway and others in their vehicles.

An on-site protection order has been placed for residents of Wakefield and Reading and part of Interstate 95 has been closed to traffic.

By 10.15 a.m., the police had arrested the nine remaining members of the group. All surrendered without incident, Colonel Mason said, and “a number” of firearms were confiscated.

The police lifted the detention order and the motorway was released after the men were arrested.

Middlesex County’s district attorney Marian Ryan said she believed the men would face “firearms and other charges” Tuesday. State police said several of the men refused to provide any information about their identity, which delayed the booking process.

The Massachusetts state website states, “The laws governing the transportation of firearms can be confusing. Basically: If you keep the weapon unloaded and locked in a suitcase in the trunk or rear storage compartment of a truck or SUV, you must comply with the applicable laws. “

Colonel Mason said the men involved in the standoff said they were part of a group called Rise of the Moors. On the group’s website, Rise of the Moors says it seeks “equal justice under our own right and not under the United States government because we are not citizens of the United States.”

“Since we are not US citizens, we owe the United States government no tax obligations,” it says on the website.

They describe themselves as “Moorish Americans devoted to educating new Moors and influencing our elders,” according to the website.

Colonel Mason said the group’s “professed leader wanted to know that their ideology is not anti-government”.

“Our research will give us more insight into their motivations and ideology,” he said.

“We are not anti-government,” said one man early Saturday morning in a livestream on the group’s YouTube channel.

The man, who was wearing military clothing, said the group stopped to refuel with petrol cans to avoid “unnecessary stops” while carrying firearms. The man also said the group was traveling to their “private country”.

“We have no intention of being hostile, we have no intention of being aggressive,” he later added. “We are not against the government, we are not against the police, we are not sovereign citizens and we are not extremists with a black identity.”

“We are foreigners,” called another member of the group from the background.

Recognition…YouTube channel “Uprising of the Moors”

Rise of the Moors appears to be based in Pawtucket, RI, according to the group’s website. The group did not immediately respond to an email requesting a comment.

Pawtucket police “know” the group and have had “various interactions” with them, said Emily Rizzo, a Pawtucket Mayor spokeswoman, who said they could not immediately provide further details.

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, a Moorish sovereign civil movement is an extremist ideology that emerged in the early 1990s. It is an offshoot of the anti-government movement for sovereign citizens, which believes that individual citizens have sovereignty over the authority of federal and state governments and are independent of them. According to the centre’s website, the groups are typically small and consist of a few dozen followers.

It is unclear what connection Rise of the Moors could have with this movement.

According to a 2016 report by the Anti-Defamation League, the Moorish sovereign citizen movement began when people fused the beliefs of sovereign citizens with some of the beliefs of the Moorish Temple of Science, a 1913 religious sect.

In the late 1990s and early 2000s, the movement grew and absorbed other black sovereign groups, according to the ADL. had started independently

The report states that Moorish sovereign citizens committed the same criminal activities as “traditional” sovereign civic groups, including violent crimes, fraud, defrauding and intimidating public officials.

Categories
Politics

Biden hosts 21 new U.S. residents at White Home naturalization ceremony

US President Joe Biden watches as people take the Oath of allegiance during a naturalization ceremony for new citizens ahead of Independence Day in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC on July 2, 2021.

Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

President Joe Biden hosted a naturalization ceremony on Friday to swear in and welcome 21 new U.S. citizens ahead of Independence Day. 

“It’s the dreams of immigrants like you that build America and continue to inject new energy, new vitality and new strength,” Biden said at the ceremony in the East Room of the White House.

The president was joined at the event by Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, who shared the story of his immigrant parents’ journey to the United States as refugees.

“Our country is also better today because its identity and its fabric as a nation of immigrants is stronger because of you,” Mayorkas said after the new citizens were sworn in.

Tracy Renaud, the acting director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, performed the swearing-in. The USCIS announced Thursday that it would hold 170 naturalization ceremonies in the first week of July.

The jubilant ceremony at the White House belied the challenge the Biden administration is facing as it works to stem the ongoing migrant crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The president came into office pledging to pursue an immigration policy that was both more humane and more orderly than that of his predecessor, former President Donald Trump.

At Friday’s ceremony, Biden commended immigrants for their contributions to the country, noting that many serve in the military or have been working as health-care and front-line workers during the pandemic. 

The president also presented an award to Sandra Lindsay, a nurse from Long Island who immigrated to the U.S. from Jamaica when she was 18 years old.

Lindsay was the first person in America to get fully vaccinated outside of clinical trials, Biden said. Her scrubs will form part of a future exhibit about Covid at the Smithsonian Institution, he added.

“Since our nation’s founding, the quintessential idea in America has been nurtured and advanced by the contributions and sacrifices of so many people, almost all of whom were immigrants,” Biden said. 

The president also took the opportunity to tout his administration’s efforts to reform the immigration system. 

He highlighted his support for the immigration reform bill introduced by Democrats in February, which includes improved border management and security, and a pathway to citizenship for 11 million undocumented people in America.

He also praised Vice President Kamala Harris’ efforts to identify the “root causes” of the recent surge in Central American migrants coming to the U.S.-Mexico border. 

Harris visited the southern border earlier this month but faced criticism from Republicans for not having gone there sooner.

The heart of the migrant surge has been an unprecedented jump in the number of unaccompanied minors apprehended at the border and remanded to U.S. government custody while suitable guardians are located.

But that number has been falling steadily since it reached a high in March of this year. As of Tuesday, there were 14,400 unaccompanied minors in U.S. government care, a 35% drop from two months ago, when the Health and Human Services Department was housing more than 22,000 minors.

Democrats and pro-immigrant activists are urging Biden to further scale back border enforcement and to do more to ensure the humane treatment of migrant children and families at the southern border.

Categories
Politics

Trump Is Stated to Have Known as Arizona Official After Election Loss

President Donald J. Trump tried to call the Republican leader of Arizona’s most populous district twice last winter when the Trump campaign and its allies tried unsuccessfully to undo Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s narrow win in the state’s presidential contest . according to the Republican official and records from The Arizona Republic, a Phoenix newspaper.

But the leader, Clint Hickman, then chairman of the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, said in an interview Friday that he put the calls – made in late December and early January – on voicemail and not returned them. “I told people, ‘Please don’t let the president call me,'” he said.

At the time, Mr. Hickman was being urged by the state’s Republican Party leader and Mr. Trump’s attorney Rudolph W. Giuliani to investigate allegations of fraud in the district election, which Mr. Biden had won by approximately 45,000 votes.

Liz Harrington, a spokeswoman for Mr Trump, said in a statement that “it is no surprise that Maricopa County’s electoral officials did not wish to investigate significant irregularities during the election,” although there was no evidence of widespread problems of choice in Arizona there. It did not directly address the calls allegedly made by Mr Trump. Two former campaign workers said they did not know about how to contact the Maricopa District official.

The Arizona Republic received the recordings of Mr. Trump and Mr. Giuliani’s phone calls following an inquiry under the Freedom of Information Act.

Mr. Hickman and the four other county overseers confirmed the election results and repeatedly called the vote free and fair. But the Republican-controlled state senate began its own review of all 2.1 million votes cast in the county, which has been heavily criticized by officials from both parties and is still ongoing.

The Arizona Republic reported that the calls came when Republican chairman of the state, Kelli Ward, tried to connect Hickman and other district officials with Mr Trump and his allies so they could discuss alleged irregularities in the district’s election.

Ms. Ward first told Mr. Hickman on November 13, the day after the Maricopa vote count sealed Mr. Biden’s victory in Arizona that the president would likely call him. But the first call didn’t come in until New Year’s Eve when Hickman said the White House operator called him while he was dining with his wife.

Mr Hickman said the operator left a voicemail message saying Mr Trump wanted to speak to him and asking him to call back. He did not do it.

Four nights later, the White House operator called Mr. Hickman again, he said. At that point, Mr. Hickman recalled, he had read a transcript of Mr. Trump’s call to Brad Raffensperger, the Georgia Secretary of State, whom Mr. Trump had pressured “to find more votes” to undo his defeat in the state .

“I saw what happened in Georgia and I was like, ‘I don’t want to be part of this madness and the only way I can get into it is to call the president back,'” Hickman said.

He sent the call to voicemail and did not return it as the county was in litigation over the election results at the time.

In November and December, Mr. Giuliani also called Mr. Hickman and the three other Republicans on the board, The Republic reported. That call to Mr. Hickman went to his voicemail, he said, and he didn’t return it.

Among those with whom he debated whether to return Mr Trump’s calls, Hickman said was Thomas Liddy, the Maricopa County’s chief litigation officer. Mr. Liddy is a son of G. Gordon Liddy, the key figure in the Watergate break-in.

“The story collides,” said Mr. Hickman. “It’s a small world.”

Annie Karni contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Trump lawyer Michael Cohen strikes to sue U.S. over jail return and ebook

Michael Cohen leaves the Manhattan Attorney’s Office in New York City on March 19, 2021.

Michael M. Santiago | Getty Images

Michael Cohen, the former personal lawyer and fixer of ex-President Donald Trump, has sued the US government for $ 20 million for being illegally jailed last year in retaliation for planning a book about Trump.

Cohen has filed a lawsuit against the US Prison Bureau, accusing the government of false arrest, false detention and unlawful detention.

Cohen, 54, says he suffered “emotional pain and suffering, mental agony and the loss of freedom” when he was sent back to federal prison just weeks after his early leave in July 2020 on concerns about his risk from Covid-19 has been.

Cohen’s attorneys are preparing a second lawsuit alleging that then Attorney General William Barr and BOP Director Michael Carvajal violated his freedom of expression in the First Amendment by putting him back in prison.

The filing comes almost a year after a Manhattan federal judge ordering Cohen’s release after more than two weeks ruled that Barr and Carvajal’s purpose in sending Cohen back to prison was “retaliation in response that Cohen intended to exercise his First Amendment ”. Rights to publish a book critical of the presidency and to discuss the book on social media. “

The government has six months to respond to Cohen’s lawsuit. If she doesn’t respond, he could file a lawsuit against the government and other defendants.

The Bureau of Prisons did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Cohen declined to comment on the case.

His attorney Jeffrey Levine said in a statement: “Mr. Cohen was the personal attorney for the President of the United States, and if he could be thrown in jail for writing a critical book about the President, the President’s imagination didn’t take far to go. ” before we realize that such unacceptable and unconstitutional behavior could be directed against any of us. “

“This is not an exaggeration and it is not acceptable,” said Levine.

Levine told CNBC that Cohen was looking for documents under the Freedom of Information Act that “lead to retaliation” but “nothing significant” was provided by the government.

“The filing [of a claim] … is the beginning of our search for the truth, “Levine said in an email.” That is the Justice Department’s gun violence by former President and his accomplice AG William Barr, and responsibility for their actions. “

Cohen, who served Trump faithfully for years, pleaded guilty to several federal crimes in 2018.

These included campaign funding violations related to hush money payments to women who claimed to have sex with Trump, lying to Congress about plans to build a Trump Tower in Moscow, and financial crime.

Cohen also became a harsh critic of Trump and cooperated with several investigations against the then president.

On Thursday, the Trump Organization and its CFO Allen Weisselberg were indicted in the Manhattan Supreme Court over a tax evasion scheme on the compensation of executives, including Weisselberg. Cohen assisted the Manhattan District Attorney’s investigation into the charges.

Cohen went to jail in early 2019 after being sentenced to three years in prison. In spring 2020, however, he was given leave of absence because he feared that he was particularly at risk from the corona virus due to previous illnesses.

Shortly after his release, Cohen and his attorney were called to Manhattan on July 9 for a meeting with federal probation officers to discuss the terms of his home detention, which he was serving in lieu of his sentence.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Cohen was taken into custody that day and returned to Otisville, New York Jail, after resisting on condition that he would not publish a book about Trump or anyone else while serving the remainder of his sentence in domestic custody.

“I’ve never seen a clause like this in 21 years as a judge and convicting people,” Judge Alvin Hellerstein said during a hearing where Cohen’s lawyers demanded his release. “How can I draw conclusions other than retaliation?”

Last year the BOP said: “Any claim that the decision to send Michael Cohen to prison was in retaliation is obviously wrong.”

“While it is not uncommon for BOP to limit inmates’ contact with the media in some way, Mr. Cohen’s refusal to accept these terms here played no part in the decision to take him into custody, nor did his intention to publish a book . “

Categories
Politics

Proving Racist Intent: Democrats Face Excessive New Bar in Opposing Voting Legal guidelines

The Supreme Court’s 6-to-3 ruling on Thursday that upheld the Arizona voting restrictions effectively raised the bar for voting lawyers for filing federal cases under the Voting Rights Act: demonstrating discriminatory intent.

This burden is causing civil rights and electoral groups to reshuffle their approach in court to challenge the series of new restrictions imposed by Republican-controlled lawmakers this year following Donald J. Trump’s electoral defeat in November. You can no longer rely on the federal courts, including the Supreme Court, to act as a backbone to prevent racially discriminatory electoral restrictions.

“We have to remember that the Supreme Court doesn’t save us – it will not protect our democracy in those moments when it is most needed, ”said Sam Spital, the head of litigation at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, on Friday.

The Supreme Court in a 2013 ruling gutted the core protections of the Voting Rights Act, and on Thursday the court further narrowed the law’s scope in combating discriminatory laws by setting tough new guidelines for demonstrating the effects of the law on colored voters thus litigation parties to overcome the much higher bar for the evidence of a specific intention to discriminate.

Mr Spital said his group must carefully weigh their next steps and “think very carefully” before bringing up new cases that, if defeated, could set harmful new precedents. The Arizona case, filed by the Democratic National Committee in 2016, was seen as a weak tool to challenge new electoral laws; even the Biden administration acknowledged that Arizona law was non-discriminatory under the electoral law. Choosing the wrong cases in the wrong jurisdictions could lead to further setbacks, said Mr. Spital and other proxies.

At the same time, according to Mr. Spital, it is imperative that the election restrictions imposed by the Republicans do not remain unchallenged.

“It will force us to work even harder in the cases we bring,” he said. “Once the rules of the game are in place, even if they’re against us, we have the resources – we have exceptional lawyers, exceptional clients, and we have the facts on our side.”

Thursday’s ruling also revealed an uncomfortable new reality for Democrats and electoral activists: Under current law, they can expect little help from the federal courts with electoral laws passed by the party that controls a state government. Republican lawmakers in Georgia, Florida, and Iowa have been aggressive to enforce electoral laws, brushing aside protests from Democrats, constituencies, and even big corporations.

The Arizona Republicans were open about the partisan nature of their efforts when the Supreme Court heard the case in March. An Arizona Republican Party attorney told judges that the restrictions were necessary because, without them, Republicans in the state would have “a competitive disadvantage compared to the Democrats.”

“It’s a lot harder to prove these things – it takes a lot more evidence,” said Travis Crum, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis who specializes in voting rights and reassignment cases.Courts are often reluctant to label lawmakers as racist. That is why the effect standard was added in 1982. “

The High Court’s decision also increases stakes for the 2022 gubernatorial competitions in major swing states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, where Democratic governors stand ready to block measures proposed by Republican-controlled lawmakers. If a Republican won the governor’s seat in any of these states, lawmakers would have a clear way of enforcing new electoral laws.

Republicans on Friday praised the Supreme Court ruling, calling it an affirmation of the need to tackle electoral fraud – although no evidence of widespread fraud emerged in President Biden’s victory.

Justin Riemer, chief counsel for the Republican National Committee, argued that the new majority opinion Judge Samuel Alito “guides” would be welcome and would force recognition of the wider choice in a state.

“It affirmed, for example, that states have an incredibly important interest in protecting themselves from electoral fraud and in strengthening voter confidence,” said Riemer. “When the court looked at Arizona law, it found how generous the voting rules were.”

Riemer noted that Democrats would also find it harder to meet new standards to show that laws place undue burdens on voters.

“I don’t want to say that it completely excludes them from Section 2, but it will make it very difficult for them to remove laws that are really minimal, if any, onerous,” said Riemer, referring to the sections of the Voting Rights Act dealing with racially discriminatory practices.

Major rulings by the Supreme Court confirming a new restriction on the right to vote have been followed in the past by waves of new law at the state level. In 2011, 34 states introduced some form of new voter identification laws after the court upheld the Indiana Voter Identification Act in 2008.

The first immediate test of a newly encouraged legislature will take place next week in Texas, where the legislature is due to hold a special session in a second attempt by Republicans to pass an election revision bill. The first attempt failed after the Democrats staged a controversial night strike in the state legislature and temporarily halted proposals that were among the most restrictive in the country.

These proposals included bans on new voting methods, shortening Sunday elections, and provisions that would facilitate the cancellation of elections and greatly empower partisan election observers.

The uncertain litigation will be played out in a federal justice system reshaped during Mr. Trump’s tenure, and Democrats in Congress have failed to enact federal voter protection.

The Legal Defense Fund, which Mr. Spital represents, sued Georgia in May over its new voting laws, arguing that the laws had a discriminatory effect. Other lawsuits, including one filed by the Justice Department last week, argue that Georgia acted with intent to discriminate against colored voters.

However, some Democrats complained about the Supreme Court decision, but noted that they still have many constitutional tools to challenge repressive electoral laws.

“Obviously, litigation is getting harder now,” said Aneesa McMillan, deputy general manager of Super PAC Priorities USA, which oversees the organization’s voting efforts. “But most of the cases we contest we contest based on the first, 14th and 15th amendments to the Constitution.”

One of the guidelines that Judge Alito formulated was an assessment of the “standard practice” of voting in 1982 when Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act was amended.

“It is relevant that in 1982 the states generally obliged almost all voters to cast their ballots in person on election day, and only allowed narrow and well-defined categories of voters to cast postal ballots,” wrote Judge Alito.

The court did not address the purpose clause in Section 2. However, these cases are often based on racist statements by lawmakers or irregularities in the legislative process – elements of a legal dispute that are more difficult to prove than the effects.

“You won’t get any evidence of this smoking gun,” said Sophia Lakin, the ACLU’s deputy director of the Voting Rights Project. “Much evidence is being brought together to show that the purpose is to take away the rights of colored voters.”

In Texas, some Democrats in the Legislature had hoped they could work towards a more moderate version of the bill in the special session beginning next week; It remains to be seen whether the Supreme Court decision will lead Republicans to adopt an even more restrictive law.

Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick and State Representative Briscoe Cain, both Republicans, did not respond to requests for comment. Speaker Dan Phelan and State Senator Bryan Hughes, both Republicans, declined to comment.

However, whether the Supreme Court decision will open the floodgates for more restrictive electoral laws in other states remains an open question; more than 30 state legislatures adjourned for the year, and others have already passed their voting laws.

“It is hard to imagine what an increase in election restrictions would look like now because we are already seeing such a dramatic increase, more than ever since the reconstruction,” said Wendy Weiser, director of the Democracy Program at the Brennan Center for Justice, a research institute. “But the passing of new waves of laws has certainly been the answer in recent years.”

Wisconsin Governor Tony Evers is one of the Democratic governors withholding voting actions passed by Republican-led lawmakers. On Wednesday, he vetoed the first of several Republican electoral process laws.

In an interview, he said that the Republicans’ months of efforts to revive the 2020 elections have made voting at the health and education level a top priority for voters in Wisconsin.

“People are realizing more and more that it’s an important issue,” said Evers. “Frankly, the Republicans have taken it upon themselves. I don’t think the Wisconsin people thought the election was stolen. You understand it was a fair choice. And so the Republicans’ inability to accept the loss of Donald Trump makes it more of a bread-and-butter problem here. “

Categories
Politics

Miami-Dade mayor indicators order to demolish remainder of constructing

An aerial view of the site during a rescue operation of the Champlain Tower, which partially collapsed on July 1, 2021 in Surfside, Florida.

Tayfun Coskun | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

Miami-Dade Mayor Daniella Levine Cava signed an emergency ordinance on Friday authorizing the demolition of a 12-story residential complex that partially collapsed more than a week ago.

Engineers will evaluate all possible impacts of the demolition before setting a specific start date, said Levine Cava, which will likely take a few weeks.

“The building poses a threat to public health and safety and it is important to demolish it as soon as possible to protect our community,” Levine Cava said during a news conference on Friday night, adding that the search and bailouts remain the first priority of the authorities.

Levine Cava also announced that two more bodies were found, bringing the death toll to at least 22 while 126 people are still missing.

Levine Cava and Miami Mayor Francis Suarez discovered Friday that one of the bodies found was from a seven-year-old child whose father works for the Miami Fire Department.

“It was really different and more difficult for our first responders,” Levine Cava told reporters.

“These men and women pay an enormous human toll every day, and I ask all of you to keep them all in your thoughts and prayers. They truly represent the very best in all of us, and we have to be.” there for you as you are there for us. “

Levine Cava also announced that a building in North Miami had been found unsafe after being checked by authorities and found that it would not have been recertified. According to the Associated Press, authorities have ordered an evacuation of the building.

Kevin Guthrie, Florida Emergency Management Director, thanked the federal government and private sector providers for their support.

Following his visit to Surfside yesterday, President Joe Biden officially authorized the federal government on Friday to begin November 24th.

The Royal Caribbean Group is providing free accommodation and resources to search and rescue teams on one of their ships docked in PortMiami. Amazon has also assisted search and rescue teams by donating 500 laundry bags, 2,000 laundry capsules, and 2,000 dryer sheets, he added.

“The support we have seen for our first responders has been absolutely incredible,” said Guthrie.

Governor Ron DeSantis provided additional updates on Hurricane Elsa, noting that South Florida could see tropical storm winds as early as Sunday night. Authorities are currently watching for the potential impact on Miami-Dade County.

Charles Cyrille, director of the Department of Emergency Management, urged citizens to begin preparing evacuation plans, which include three to seven days of supplies for each member of a household. Cyrille added that homes should also be prepared for impact by securing items like trash cans and patio furniture that can easily be blown away by a hurricane.

“It is critical that these preparatory activities begin today,” said Cyrille.

Surfside Mayor Charles Burkett also briefed on the previous Friday about the Champlain Towers North, the sister property of the collapsed condominium building. Burkett said arrangements have been made to relocate residents while experts prepare to conduct a forensic study on the structure to assess their safety.

Search and rescue operations were resumed on Thursday evening after a day-long standstill, with authorities hoping to safely expand the search area.

DeSantis added that search and rescue teams for Virginia, Indiana, Ohio, Pennsylvania and New Jersey will assist the state emergency response teams and prepare for Hurricane Elsa.

The suspension of search and rescue operations Thursday morning was due to structural concerns identified by subject matter experts, according to Alan Cominsky, chief of fire in Miami-Dade.

The investigation into the cause of the collapse is still ongoing.

Recent evidence suggests the 40-year-old condominium building showed signs of major structural damage as early as 2018, with one report citing problems with waterproofing under the pool and cracks in the underground parking garage.

A video that was recorded the night of the collapse has also come to light showing water flowing into the building’s parking garage.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST, announced Wednesday evening that it had initiated a state investigation into the cause of the collapse and developed improved building codes.

Former NIST director Dr. Walter Copan, who ran the agency under then-President Donald Trump until January 2021, told the Miami Herald that it could only be a few months for NIST to provide new facts from the investigation.

“Typically there will be an initial summary within three to six months to provide the public with a status update,” said Copan, according to the Herald.

“NIST’s primary role is to provide the public with regular updates on NIST’s technical analysis and the cause of the failure.”

Categories
Politics

Biden Helps Altering Army Legislation on Sexual Assault Instances

President Biden said Friday that he wanted the military to remove the investigation and prosecution of sexual assault cases from the control of commanders, a sea change for the military justice system.

An independent commission formally recommended to Defense Secretary Lloyd J. Austin III this week that sexual assault, sexual harassment and related cases be shifted to special victims prosecutors outside of the chain of command in the military, something military leaders have long resisted, arguing that it would hinder order and discipline.

“Sexual assault is an abuse of power and an affront to our shared humanity,” Mr. Biden said in a prepared statement. “And sexual assault in the military is doubly damaging because it also shreds the unity and cohesion that is essential to the functioning of the U.S. military and to our national defense.”

While Mr. Austin and Mr. Biden have supported the findings of the commission — which are all but certain to receive pushback from officials from some branches of the military — it will be up to Congress to change the military law.

Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Democrat of New York, has a bipartisan measure that would overhaul the way the military prosecutes sexual assault but also other serious crimes, which some lawmakers believe is crucial in adjudicating cases like the one involving Army Specialist Vanessa Guillen. Law enforcement officials said she was killed by another soldier at Fort Hood last year.

Her bill has gained support from at least 70 members of the Senate — including many who voted against the same bill in 2014, arguing it would undermine commanders. Reconciling her bill with the vision of the commission will now be in the hands of lawmakers.

In 2019, the Defense Department found that there were 7,825 reports of sexual assault involving service members as victims, a 3 percent increase from 2018. The conviction rate for cases was unchanged from 2018 to 2019; 7 percent of cases that the command took action on resulted in conviction, the lowest rate since the department began reporting in 2010.

“I want to recognize the experience of our service members who have survived sexual assault and the bravery of those who have shared their stories with the world and advocated for reform,” Mr. Biden said, adding, “I hope this announcement offers some reassurance that the Department of Defense leadership stands with you, starting with your commander in chief.”

Categories
Politics

Search resumes at collapsed Florida apartment web site

A sad family awaits at the site while a team of rescue workers work during a rescue operation of the Champlain Tower, which partially collapsed on June 30, 2021 in Surfside, Florida, USA.

Tayfun Coskun | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

Search and rescue operations in a Florida condo collapse resumed Thursday after a one-day shutdown, Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava said at a press conference Thursday evening.

The decision to resume operations was made around 4:45 p.m. Thursday after civil engineers said conditions were safe enough, Levine Cava said. Operations were suspended Thursday morning over concerns that the rest of the building could collapse.

“I am grateful for your hard work in getting us back to search and rescue as quickly as possible,” said Levine Cava. “Of course, we continue to assure that we are doing everything we can to protect our first aiders.”

The death toll remained unchanged through Thursday, with 18 confirmed deaths and 145 missing, according to Levine Cava.

While search and rescue is the authorities’ top priority, plans to demolish the building are currently underway, Levine Cava told reporters.

Miami-Dade Fire Rescue chief Alan Cominsky said all task force leaders, division group leaders, and heavy equipment operators had been briefed of a search resumption plan with security measures.

Authorities are restricting access to parts of the collapse zone that raise safety concerns, Levine Cava said. Technologies such as cameras and drones are used to search inaccessible areas of the building.

A team of engineers are also conducting tests and evaluations to safely expand the search area, she added.

Levine Cava and other authorities also thanked President Joe Biden and First Lady Jill Biden for visiting Surfside early Thursday, noting that Biden offered comfort to families affected by the collapse.

Kevin Guthrie, director of the Florida emergency management department, added that Biden has pledged to cover 100% of reimbursements for local governments facing deficits due to the breakdown.

Emergency Management Director Charles Cyrille also briefed on Tropical Storm Elsa, which continues to move rapidly through the Caribbean Sea. Cyrille told reporters that the State Department of Emergency Management continues to monitor the storm and that contingency plans are in place.

Cyrille said “Miami-Dade County is not in imminent danger,” but urged citizens to be prepared with disaster packages and evacuation plans.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

Cominsky, the chief of the fire department, said the decision to cease operations Thursday morning was based on “additional concerns about building stability” identified by subject matter experts.

These concerns included 15 to 12 inches of movement, a large pillar hanging from the building that could fall and damage the support columns in the underground car park, and slight movement in the concrete floor slabs on the south side of the structure that “could lead to additional failure” . of the building, “says Cominsky.

In the last few days there have been increasing indications that the 40-year-old apartment building had already suffered considerable structural damage in 2018.

A newly discovered video, captured the night of the collapse, shows water pouring into the Champlain Towers parking garage.

On Wednesday evening, the National Institute of Standards and Technology announced it had launched a federal investigation into the causes of the building collapse.

“We are going in with an open mind,” said Judith Mitrani-Reiser, deputy head of the materials and support systems department at NIST, at a press conference near the collapse site on Wednesday.

“Whenever a building collapses, we want to understand how the building was designed, built, modified and maintained,” she said.

Several lawsuits have been filed on behalf of the victims’ families, some of which are still missing.

But the question of who, if anything, was responsible for the breakdown is unlikely to be resolved anytime soon.

James Olthoff, the director of NIST, told the Miami Herald the federal investigation will not attempt to assign the blame for the collapse.

“This is a kind of fact-finding, not troubleshooting, type of investigation,” he told the Herald. “It will take time, possibly a few years.”

Correction: This story has been updated to correctly describe Tropical Storm Elsa.