Categories
Politics

Democrats Roll Out $3.5 Trillion Price range to Fulfill Expansive Agenda

WASHINGTON – President Biden and the Democrats in Congress on Wednesday promised to push through a $ 3.5 trillion budget that would usher in a transformative expansion of social and environmental programs into law, and began an arduous effort to transform their vision to expand the reach of public education and health care, tax the rich and seek to curb planet warming.

The legislation is still far from reality, but the details that top Democrats have brought together are far-reaching. Pre-kindergarten would be universal for all 3- and 4-year-olds, two years of community college would be free, utility companies would have to produce a certain amount of clean energy, and prescription drug prices would be reduced. Medicare benefits would be extended and green cards would be extended to more undocumented immigrants.

Over a closed-door lunch at the Capitol, Mr. Biden gathered the Democrats and the Independents who allied with them to adopt the plan that would require each of their votes to overcome the united Republican opposition. But key moderates first had to shake hands as to whether they would welcome such a far-reaching proposal.

Mr. Biden’s message to the Senators, said Senator Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, was that the Democrats “must be united, strong, great and courageous.”

“We can do it,” Mr. Biden told reporters at the Capitol.

The Senate could start moving the plan forward in weeks, though a final vote could still take months and face several hurdles. For now, even if the moderates refused to commit to the package without further details, the Democrats and their independent allies insist they are together.

Spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi, who ultimately has to get the package through a tightly divided house, told Democrats in a letter on Wednesday: “This budget deal is a victory for the American people and makes a historic, unique step forward for families across America the nation . “

Senate Democratic leaders have stated that they will approve both the draft budget and a tighter, bipartisan infrastructure plan that will be written before the Chamber leaves for the August recess, an extraordinarily complex and politically charged endeavor in a 50-50 Senate .

“This is a moment in history when the United States must assert itself anew in its dealings with families, our dealings with our children, the existential crisis of climate change, and our dealings with China,” said Senator Mark Warner, Democrat of Virginia and a key negotiator, told reporters on Wednesday.

Combined with the infrastructure plan, the social spending is expected to meet Mr. Biden’s $ 4 trillion economic proposal. The Democrats on the Senate Budgets Committee will have to submit a budget resolution in the coming days containing so-called reconciliation instructions to other Senate committees, which will in turn draft laws detailing how the $ 3.5 trillion will be spent – and how taxes will be spent Payment should be increased for this.

That would pave the way for Democrats to come up with a reconciliation bill this fall that would be safe from a filibuster and allow them to bypass the Republican opposition but pass all 50 of its members – and a majority in the narrowly divided house.

The reconciliation package would be crammed with liberal priorities, including expanding Medicare to include dental, visual and hearing services, clean energy, paid vacation and home care – all paid for with tax increases for wealthy individuals and businesses.

At the private luncheon, New York Senator Chuck Schumer, the majority leader, outlined the outline of the proposal and the guidelines it contained.

The Democrats included the creation of a “civilian climate corps” to create jobs in the fight against climate change and conservation, as well as childcare, home care and housing investments.

They would also extend some temporary accruals from the $ 1.9 trillion pandemic relief package, mostly monthly payments for everyone but the richest families with children, and extended subsidies for Americans who buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act .

Updated

July 14, 2021 at 4:50 p.m. ET

Huge investments would go into renewable energy and a transformed electrical system to shift the US economy from oil, natural gas, and coal to wind, solar, and other renewable energy sources. The draft budget should include a clean energy standard that would mandate the generation of electricity from renewable energy sources and strengthen tax incentives for buying electric cars and trucks.

To fully fund the bill, it is expected to include higher taxes on overseas corporate activities to reduce the incentives to send profits overseas, higher capital return ratios for wealthy individuals and higher taxes on large inheritances, as well as stronger enforcement of tax laws.

Most of the concrete details will be worked out after the budget decision has been drawn up and approved by both chambers.

Specific provisions need to be in line with the strict budgetary rules that govern the reconciliation process, which require the provisions to cover spending and taxes, not strict policy making. That could break the standard for clean energy, the most desired provision by climate activists and many scientists.

Moderate Democrats, who had resisted a progressive urge to spend up to $ 6 trillion on Mr Biden’s entire economic agenda, largely refused to participate in the blueprint, saying they need to see more than a total spending number.

“We need to get more meat on the bones for me,” Senator Jon Tester, Democrat of Montana, told reporters. “I need to get more information about what’s inside.”

The scope of the blueprint could be affected by the success or failure of the bipartisan infrastructure plan, which would provide nearly $ 600 billion in new spending on roads, bridges, tunnels, and transit. The group of lawmakers negotiating this package has yet to release a piece of legislation as they haggle over the details of the structure and payment of the plan.

However, some Republican negotiators acknowledged that advances in the broader social spending bill put pressure on them to agree on the infrastructure plan. If Republicans can’t cast enough votes to get the package past a filibuster, Democrats would just add it to the reconciliation plan and take Republicans away from any chance to shape it, said Ohio Senator Rob Portman, one of the negotiators on the bipartisan bill .

“If we can’t get past the infrastructure, they’ll build even more infrastructure than we have and worse guidelines,” said Portman, who was skeptical of his colleagues at a private Republican lunch on Tuesday. “It’s not just about spending money. It’s about politics. That’s just the reality. “

Some Republicans had hoped that a bipartisan deal on physical infrastructure projects would dissuade moderate Democrats from a multi-trillion dollar reconciliation package. But it could do the opposite – bring Republicans on board the only piece of legislation they can influence.

“I want to be able to tell the people in South Carolina, I’m for it, I’m not for it,” said Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, the senior Republican on the Senate Budgets Committee and a peripheral presence in the bipartisan talks.

He added that the lengthy floor debate over the draft would allow Republicans to “attack it savagely, pass amendments that draw the differences between the parties and shout to heaven that this is not infrastructure”.

Senator Joe Manchin III. of West Virginia, the centrist Democrat whose support could be critical, released a non-binding statement Wednesday saying only, “I know my Democratic colleagues on the Budgets Committee have worked hard and I look forward to making this agreement check. I am also very interested in how this proposal is paid for and how we can use it to remain competitive worldwide. “

Senator Kyrsten Sinema, a Democrat of Arizona and another key moderate, also held back on Wednesday when her office said she would decide whether to support the proposal based on the content.

Still, the $ 3.5 trillion package had a lot going for it to appeal to senior Democrats who were eager to use it to advance their longstanding priorities. For Washington Senator Patty Murray, chair of the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, it was an extension of a more generous child tax break, as well as grants for childcare, pre-kindergarten, and paid family leave.

For Senator Bernie Sanders, independent from Vermont and the chair of the budget committee, it was Medicare and climate regulations.

“We will finally have America in a position to be the world leader in combating climate change,” he said, calling the package “by far the most significant effort this country has ever seen” in combating climate change.

Mr. Tester said the need for school buildings is so great that it could cost trillions on that alone.

The budget decision is expected to include wording prohibiting tax increases for small businesses, farms and individuals with incomes less than $ 400,000, fulfilling an important promise Mr Biden kept during the negotiations.

Jim Tankersley, Lisa Friedman and Nicholas Fandos contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Biden to rally Senate Democrats after they attain $3.5 trillion finances deal

President Joe Biden will meet with the Senate Democratic Senate on Wednesday to endorse support for its far-reaching infrastructure and business investment goals, hours after lawmakers announced it had reached an agreement on a multi-trillion dollar budget decision Has.

That budget arrangement, which would spend $ 3.5 trillion over the next decade, will be added to the roughly $ 600 billion in new spending included in a bipartisan infrastructure plan, Democrats said Tuesday evening.

They said the budget plan was paid in full and would expand Medicare coverage for dental, visual and hearing services – two features that could help attract moderate and progressive Democrats to endorse it.

Over a closed door caucus lunch in the Capitol on Wednesday, Biden will assemble the Democrats and “lead us to this wonderful plan,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told DN.Y.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

White House press secretary Jen Psaki tweeted Wednesday morning that the president would “continue to advocate the duel-track approach to the economy by investing in infrastructure, protecting our climate and helping the next generation of workers and families better to rebuild ”.

She noted in a follow-up that she had misspelled the word “dual”.

Democratic leaders hope to get versions of the resolution through the House and Senate before lawmakers leave Washington for the August recess.

However, they admitted on Tuesday evening that their work for them was canceled because the budget only provides a rough overview of the expenses that would have to be specified in subsequent laws.

“We know that we have a long way to go,” said Schumer.

“I have no illusions how challenging this will be,” said Senator Mark Warner, D-Va., Vice chairman of the caucus.

The resolution, if passed, would pave the way for Democrats to pass a later Senate spending bill through what is known as the budget reconciliation process. That means that the Democrats would only need a simple majority in the Senate – which is 50:50 50:50 with the Republicans – and not the 60 votes that the GOP could demand through the filibuster rules.

If all 50 Democrats in the Senate support such a law, they could pass it without Republican support, as Democratic Vice President Kamala Harris could cast the decisive vote.

Senate Democratic leaders are working to get both the moderates in the faction, who have expressed their discomfort about funding the mammoth spending plans, and the progressives, who have called for much more money to spend.

Senator Bernie Sanders, on whom Schumer charged charges of including expanded Medicare coverage in the budgetary decision, and other progressives had originally pushed for a budget of $ 6 trillion. Biden had suggested less than $ 5 trillion.

Moderate Senator Joe Manchin, DW.V., expressed a very different opinion on Tuesday, telling reporters, “I think everything should be paid for. We have spent enough free money. “

In a statement Wednesday morning, Manchin said he was looking forward to reviewing the Senate Budget Committee’s agreement.

“I’m also very interested in how this proposal is paid for and how we can use it to remain globally competitive,” he said. “I will reserve the right to make any final judgment until I have had the opportunity to thoroughly evaluate the proposal.”

The budget will reportedly be in line with Biden’s promise not to impose taxes on anyone earning less than $ 400,000 a year.

Sanders said Tuesday night the legislation shows that “wealthy and large corporations will begin to pay their fair share of taxes so we can protect working families in this country.”

Another progressive, Senator Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., Told NBC News that she hoped Biden would reassure the caucus that he “will put all his energy into making this happen.”

Warren also said she wanted to hear from the President how her efforts will affect key policy areas “because of all of these aspects – childcare, climate, home and community care, child tax deduction, free community college – all of that.” it’s about how we build a future. “

The Senator added that she “will always push for the number to be increased, but for now it’s my job to say, ‘This is a lot of money'” “.

Categories
Politics

In a Milestone, Schumer Will Suggest Federal Decriminalization of Marijuana

WASHINGTON — Senator Chuck Schumer of New York plans to propose legislation on Wednesday to decriminalize marijuana at the federal level, putting his weight as majority leader behind a growing movement to unwind the decades-old war on drugs.

The draft bill, called the Cannabis Administration and Opportunity Act, would remove marijuana from the Controlled Substances Act and begin regulating and taxing it, placing federal rules on a burgeoning industry that has faced years of uncertainty. Though states would still be allowed to set their own marijuana laws, businesses and individuals in states that have legalized its use would be free for the first time to sell and consume it without the risk of federal punishment.

The proposal would also try to make recompense to communities of color and the poor for damage from years of restrictive federal drug policy. It calls for immediately expunging nonviolent marijuana-related arrests and convictions from federal records and would earmark new tax revenue for restorative justice programs intended to lift up communities affected by “the failed federal prohibition of cannabis.”

The bill aims to “finally turn the page on this dark chapter in American history and begin righting these wrongs,” said Senator Cory Booker, Democrat of New Jersey, who wrote the bill with Mr. Schumer and Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon and the chairman of the Finance Committee.

The legislation faces an uphill battle in the Senate, where Republicans are opposed, and it is unlikely to become law in the near future. President Biden has not endorsed it, and some moderate Democrats are likely to balk at the implications of decriminalizing a drug that has been policed and stigmatized for so long.

But in the arc of the public’s rapid reconsideration of marijuana laws, the presentation on Wednesday was a remarkable milestone for legalization proponents. The suggestion that the Senate’s top leader and the chairman of the powerful Finance Committee would sponsor major decriminalization legislation would have been fantastical in the not-too-distant past.

In a speech on April 20, the unofficial holiday for marijuana smokers, Mr. Schumer said he was trying to prod Washington off the sidelines of a debate in which much of the country was already engaged. Public opinion polling suggests that nearly 70 percent of Americans support legalizing marijuana. Thirty-seven states and the District of Columbia have legalized marijuana for medical use, and 18 states plus D.C. allow recreational use by adults.

Mr. Schumer has also made no secret that he believes Democrats stand to benefit politically from embracing the legalization push, particularly with young voters.

“Hopefully, the next time this unofficial holiday of 4/20 rolls around, our country will have made progress in addressing the massive overcriminalization of marijuana in a meaningful and comprehensive way,” he said in April.

The senators were expected to detail their plans later Wednesday morning at a news conference at the Capitol.

Updated 

July 13, 2021, 8:18 p.m. ET

They are expected to propose empowering the Food and Drug Administration and the Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau at the Treasury Department to begin regulating the production, distribution and sale of marijuana, removing the Drug Enforcement Administration from its current oversight role. Among other implications, the changes would allow marijuana companies already operating in states where it is legal to gain full access to the United States banking system.

The legislation would gradually institute a federal excise tax like the one on alcohol and tobacco sales, eventually as high as 25 percent for big businesses, allowing the federal government to benefit from sales that came close to $20 billion in 2020. The revenue would then be funneled back to communities most affected by federal drug policy and to fund expanded medical research into cannabis that is currently limited by its status as a controlled substance.

One provision, for instance, would establish a cannabis justice office at the Justice Department to help fund job training, legal aid and help with re-entry after incarceration. Another program would promote loans to small cannabis businesses owned by members of racially or economically marginalized groups to try to ensure that communities that suffered disproportionately under the war on drugs are not left out of the gold rush that has accompanied legalization.

But the bill would aim to make other, more direct attempts to compensate for the impacts of years of aggressive policing. In addition to expunging past arrests and convictions, it would entitle those who are currently serving sentences for nonviolent federal drug crime to a court hearing to reconsider their sentences. And if enacted, the federal government would no longer be able to discriminate against marijuana users seeking federal housing, food or health benefits.

The Democratic-led House passed similar legislation in December, with a handful of Republicans joining to vote in favor. The vote was the first and only time either chamber had endorsed the legalization of cannabis, but the bill died at the end of the last Congress. House leaders plan to pass an updated version in the coming months.

Passage through the Senate is likely to be more tricky. Mr. Schumer would need to assemble 60 votes, meaning he would need the support of at least 10 Republicans. Though libertarian-leaning Republicans have generally supported ending the prohibition of marijuana, party leaders are likely to oppose the Democrats’ plan, particularly with its emphasis on restorative justice and government intervention in the cannabis industry.

But opposition is not limited to Republicans. Mr. Schumer would have to persuade moderate Democrats who are uncomfortable with the implications of decriminalization to support it.

Mr. Biden supports decriminalizing marijuana and pulling back the war on drugs, but his views are generally more conservative than many Democrats’ and he has not endorsed Mr. Schumer’s proposal. His White House made headlines this spring for pushing out five staff members over their use of marijuana.

Categories
Politics

Biden condemns Trump’s ‘Massive Lie’ in main voting rights speech in Philadelphia

President Joe Biden on Tuesday delivered a major speech on voting rights in Philadelphia, slamming his predecessor’s “Big Lie” claim that the 2020 election was stolen. 

“It’s clear, for those who challenge the results or question the integrity of the election, no other election has ever been held under such scrutiny or such high standards. The ‘Big Lie’ is just that: a big lie,” Biden said at the National Constitution Center, just steps away from Independence Hall.

The speech comes as his administration faces growing pressure from civil rights activists and other Democrats to do more to combat attacks on voting rights, an issue that Biden called “the most significant test” of American democracy since the Civil War. 

Biden blasted former President Donald Trump’s claims that widespread voter fraud cost him the 2020 election, a claim that has pushed GOP leaders to enact a flurry of new voting laws in key states, including Florida and Georgia. Critics argue the new laws are discriminatory and restrict access to the ballot. 

The president directly denounced these efforts by GOP-controlled legislatures as a “Jim Crow assault” and compared them to behaviors seen in autocracies around the world. 

“To me, this is simple. This is election subversion. It’s the most dangerous threat to voting in the integrity of free and fair elections in our history,” Biden said. “They want the ability to reject the final count and ignore the will of the people if their preferred candidate loses.”

Protecting voting rights

Biden pressed for the passage of federal voting rights legislation during his remarks, saying that the fight to protect voting rights begins with passing the For The People Act.  

“That bill would help end voter suppression in states, get dark money out of politics, give voice to people, create fair district maps and end partisan political gerrymandering,” Biden said. 

He criticized Republicans for opposing the sweeping Democratic voting rights and government ethics bill, which failed to pass in the Senate last month after Republicans deployed the filibuster.

Biden also underscored the importance of passing the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, which would “restore and expand voting protections and prevent voter suppression.” He pressured Republican lawmakers to support such Democratic legislation that would protect voting rights. 

“We’ll ask my Republican friends in Congress and states and cities and counties to stand up, for God’s sake, and help prevent this concerted effort to undermine our election and the sacred right to vote,” Biden said. 

The president criticized the Supreme Court’s “harmful” decisions that weaken the Voting Rights Act of 1965, noting that the court first gutted a key provision of the act in 2013 and on July 1 it upheld two Republican-backed Arizona voting laws that Democrats say violate the act. 

The court has also limited the ability to “prove intentional racial discrimination,” according to a White House memo sent before the speech, making it difficult for advocacy groups and the Department of Justice to combat restrictive voter laws.

Biden called on Congress to repair the “damage done” by passing voting rights legislation.

Preparing for the midterms

Biden warned that the U.S. will “face another test in 2022” during the midterm elections, adding that the nation needs to prepare for voter suppression and election subversion. 

“We have to prepare now. As I said time and again, no matter what, you can never stop the American people from voting. They will decide, and the power must always be with the people. That’s why just like we did in 2020, we have to prepare for 2022,” Biden said. 

As of mid-June, at least 17 states have enacted laws that restrict access to voting, with more being considered, according to a report from the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University’s School of Law. 

Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia signed a restrictive election bill into law in March after it was passed by the state’s Republican-controlled legislature. The law requires voters to provide identification for mail-in ballots and prohibits people from giving food and water to voters waiting in line, punitive steps that critics say could harm turnout in minority communities. 

Biden’s administration has turned to the courts in response. The Department of Justice sued the state of Georgia on June 25, arguing that the election bill infringed on the rights of Black Georgians. 

Passing new legislation in Congress to protect voting rights would likely require a change to filibuster rules, especially as Democrats hold a razor-thin majority in the Senate. But Biden has backed reforming rather than eliminating the filibuster, making the future of new voting laws uncertain. 

Looking beyond Washington

Now, with Democrats’ legislative efforts stalled, the White House is beginning to look outside of Washington for ways to combat the wave of new voting restrictions. 

Biden has had several meetings at the White House with civil rights groups, who pushed the administration to keep fighting for voting rights despite resistance from Republicans. The groups have opposed the Republican-backed voting restrictions, which critics say are aimed at Hispanic, Black and younger voters. 

Vice President Kamala Harris, who has been tasked to lead the administration’s efforts to protect voting rights, also recently announced a new $25 million investment by the Democratic National Committee to expand its program that will help boost voter engagement in the upcoming midterm elections. 

During the first few months of his presidency, Biden also signed an executive order directing agencies to promote voter access. This includes developing better methods of distributing voting information and increasing opportunities to participate in the electoral process, which includes voters with distinct needs, such as service members, people with disabilities and tribal communities, among others.

Categories
Politics

Lawmakers Grapple Nagging Infrastructure Element: Tips on how to Pay for It

Beyond the questionable economics of the measure is politics: Conservative groups backed by money interests and grassroots activists hover an old specter of puffed up federal agents who persecute innocent taxpayers.

The campaign to end the commission is led by a well-known figure, Mr. Norquist, whose network of conservative activists has worked for decades to cut taxes and strangle the IRS. Mr Norquist said Tuesday that his weekly Conservative meeting in Washington – a center of power during the presidencies of George W. Bush and Barack Obama – has grown when it went virtual during the pandemic.

The meeting has about 160 attendees, including members of Congress, and is complemented by 40 state-level activist meetings – all currently focused on the IRS.The pitch to Republican lawmakers is that increasing enforcement will not affect Fortune 100 companies that already have in-house tax auditors to ensure compliance, but small businesses in their states – such as restaurants, bars, hairdressers, nail salons, and food trucks – take cash for payment.

“We’re letting the elected officials know that this is how people will understand this in the future,” said Norquist.

Such threats have been well received.

“It bothers a lot of Republicans, and I want a lot of Republicans to vote for it,” said Senator Jerry Moran, Republican of Kansas, of the IRS ruling, “so I hope it can be modified, narrowed – or otherwise.”

But Senator Susan Collins, Republican of Maine and negotiator, said Tuesday night, “I don’t think we’ve lost anyone,” as she and her colleagues continued to work out details.

Limiting them or throwing them overboard could lead some Republicans to accept the argument that infrastructure investments are at least partially worthwhile through improving economic efficiency and competitiveness. Some lawmakers, Democrats in particular, have argued that spending on roads, bridges, tunnels, and transit is an investment in economic efficiency and does not need to be fully offset as it is partially self-paying, much like Republicans argue that tax cuts do pay off themselves .

Categories
Politics

U.S. contemplating methods to assist Cubans after protests, State Division says

Cuban Americans demonstrate outside the White House in support of demonstrations taking place in Cuba on July 12, 2021 in Washington, DC.

Win McNamee | Getty Images

WASHINGTON – The State Department on Tuesday said the U.S. is considering an array of options to help the Cuban people, after thousands of protestors filled the streets this week over frustrations with a crippled economy hit by food and power shortages.

“We are always considering options available to us that would allow us to support the Cuban people, to support their humanitarian needs which are indeed profound, and they are profound because of not anything the United States has done, but from the actions and inactions, mismanagement, corruption of the Cuban regime,” State Department spokesman Ned Price told reporters.

Price said that in 2020 the U.S. exported more than $175 million worth of goods to Cuba, including food and medicine. He also condemned the Cuban government’s forceful attempts to silence peaceful protesters and called on Havana to “release anyone detained for peaceful protest.”

Sunday’s rare protests, the largest the communist country has seen since the 1990s, come as the government struggles to contain the coronavirus pandemic, pushing the island’s fragile health-care system to the brink.

People take part in a demonstration to support the government of the Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel in Havana, on July 11, 2021.

Yamil Lage | AFP | Getty Images

President Díaz-Canel Bermudez said in a national address on Sunday that his regime was “prepared to do anything” to quell the protests, according to a report from The Washington Post. “We will be battling in the streets,” he said, adding that the United States was in part to blame for the widespread discontent in Cuba.

On Monday, he appeared alongside members of his government and blamed U.S. trade sanctions for hampering Cuba’s growth.

Reacting to the Cuban president’s comments, Secretary of State Antony Blinken told reporters on Monday that the United States was not to blame for the laundry list of issues plaguing Havana.

Blinken said that Cubans were “tired of the mismanagement of the Cuban economy, tired of the lack of an adequate food and of course, an adequate response to the Covid-19 pandemic.”

“That is what we are hearing and seeing in Cuba, and that is a reflection of the Cuban people, not of the United States or any other outside actor,” Blinken said.

President Joe Biden told reporters at the White House on Monday that the U.S. stands “firmly with the people of Cuba as they assert their universal rights.”

“The Cuban people are demanding their freedom from an authoritarian regime. I don’t think we’ve seen anything like these protests in a long long time if, quite frankly, ever,” Biden said.

Categories
Politics

Inestabilidad en América Latina: Biden se ve obligado a enfrentar la realidad de la región

Se calcula que cuatro millones de refugiados han salido de Venezuela desde entonces, lo que ha generado una de las peores catástrofes humanitarias del mundo. Casi la mitad de estos venezolanos se encuentran en la vecina Colombia, que durante la primavera lidió con sus propios disturbios internos, cuando manifestantes —descontentos por la imposición de impuestos a nivel nacional y la fatiga provocada por la pandemia— se enfrentaron con fuerzas de seguridad del país.

El presidente de Colombia, Iván Duque Márquez, dijo en una entrevista realizada en mayo que no dudaba que Estados Unidos continuaría apoyando a su país, a pesar de las preocupaciones sobre las tácticas de su gobierno que ponían en riesgo derechos humanos.

Otros autócratas latinoamericanos han seguido el ejemplo de Maduro.

En Nicaragua, el presidente Daniel Ortega ha iniciado una ofensiva contra los medios de comunicación y la sociedad civil antes de las elecciones de noviembre, en las que buscará un cuarto mandato. Además de una reunión el mes pasado con cancilleres de Centroamérica, Antony J. Blinken, el secretario de Estado estadounidense, instó con discreción al máximo diplomático de Nicaragua a garantizar un voto libre y justo.

Al día siguiente, el gobierno de Ortega detuvo a una de sus opositoras políticas de más alto perfil.

Más tarde, funcionarios estadounidenses insistieron en la importancia de que el gobierno de Biden advirtiera a Nicaragua y a otros países latinoamericanos de la preocupación cada vez mayor de Estados Unidos por los desafíos a la democracia en la región. Ventrell, el funcionario del Departamento de Estado, dijo que la embestida de Ortega, un exrevolucionario y un viejo problema para Estados Unidos, era una prueba del poco apoyo que conservaba entre los votantes nicaragüenses.

Pero el gobierno de Biden es muy consciente de la naturaleza endeble de la democracia en la región.

“Seamos honestos: las democracias son frágiles. Lo reconozco absolutamente”, dijo Samantha Power, administradora de la Agencia de Estados Unidos para el Desarrollo Internacional, en un discurso el mes pasado en la Universidad Centroamericana en San Salvador.

Aseguró que los ataques a jueces, periodistas, funcionarios electorales y otras instituciones en Estados Unidos revelaron que un ataque a las libertades y las libertades civiles podría ocurrir en cualquier lugar.

Por eso, dijo Power, “es tan importante luchar contra la corrupción, luchar contra el comportamiento autocrático en cualquier lugar en el que ocurra, porque estas acciones pueden crecer con rapidez para amenazar la estabilidad, amenazar la democracia, amenazar la prosperidad”.

Categories
Politics

Biden hosts police chiefs as Democrats attempt to comprise political fallout

United States President Joe Biden, center, speaks during a meeting in the Roosevelt Room of the White House in Washington, DC, the United States, on Monday, July 12, 2021.

Sarah Silberner | UPI | Bloomberg | Getty Images

President Joe Biden met with U.S. police chiefs and elected officials at the White House on Monday to discuss his plan to combat a sustained nationwide surge in gun violence.

“We recognize that we must come together for the first responsibility of democracy: to protect one another,” said Biden before the meeting. “And that’s what the American people are looking for when it comes to reducing violent crime and gun violence.”

Biden was accompanied to the White House by US Attorney General Merrick Garland, New York City Democratic candidate for mayoral, Eric Adams, head of community intervention, and several mayors and police chiefs from large and medium-sized US cities to develop his gun crime prevention strategy to discuss. which was unveiled last month.

The meeting takes place amid an epidemic of gun violence in several of the country’s largest cities, a growing political issue for Democrats and the central theme of Republican efforts to take over the House of Representatives and the Senate next year.

The Biden administration faces a major hurdle to reconcile the fight against gun violence with continued pressure on police reform in the US following the assassination of George Floyd last year, especially as the president tried to break away from Defund to remove the Police “of the Democrats. Messaging.

During the meeting, Biden encouraged communities to use $ 350 billion from the American Rescue Plan, a $ 1.9 trillion pandemic relief plan passed by Congress in March, to help improve public safety. This includes strengthening law enforcement and developing community services that prevent crime.

A memo sent out by the administration on Monday provided examples of how cities are using the funds.

New York City, for example, suggested using more than $ 44 million to expand community violence intervention models and reinstall an additional 200 police services to perform on-site administrative tasks.

Other cities listed in the memo include Washington, which proposed using $ 59 million to provide seats for police cadets, community services, and financial aid that would help citizens involved in gun violence, again return to the church.

“The American bailouts, which go directly to local governments like ours, allow us not only to have the officials we need, but also the local violence interrupters we need to fund pilot programs that help returning citizens … that Ecosystem to make cities safer, “Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser said in an interview with MSNBC.

The American rescue plan, however, is only part of Biden’s overall strategy to curb violent crime.

The strategy also strengthens federal gun law enforcement by introducing a new “zero tolerance” policy for gun dealers who violate federal gun sales laws, and delegates new powers to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) to revoke dealer licenses revoke at first violations.

Other federal efforts the strategy brought with it included the establishment of five new federal strike forces, led by the ATF, to monitor and intercept arms smuggling along several major corridors for the arms trade between major cities.

Federal statistics show a significant increase in homicides nationwide, with an increase of 30% in 2020 compared to the previous year.

Across the country, mayors and police chiefs are struggling to explain what is behind the rise in mass shootings, murders and other violent crimes.

Experts point to a perfect storm of factors that collided during the pandemic. These include a surge in private arms sales, widespread unemployment, and Covid jobs that stay at home, leaving people trapped and with little to do.

At the same time, protests against police killing of blacks may have diverted police resources from traditional policing and undermined public confidence in the prosecution.

However, many of the factors believed to have contributed to the rise in violent crime are difficult to quantify.

And since policing is typically highly localized in America, Biden’s options at the federal level are limited.

– CNBC’s Christina Wilkie contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

E.U. Delays Digital Levy as Tax Talks Proceed

Other finance ministers indicated that the delay was another sign of progress.

“It’s very, very good that we are now going to the next step, discussing how we will implement this at the European Union and that the European Union is deciding not to go with its own proposal to the public today,” Olaf Scholz, Germany’s finance minister, said as he entered the meeting.

The E.U. digital levy proposal faced a difficult path to becoming law in Europe, but the prospect of a new proposal that could be construed as a tax that targets American companies would have been another distraction for the fragile negotiations.

The United States has already been angered by other digital taxes that countries like France, Italy and Britain have enacted, which are separate from the new proposal. More than a dozen countries have enacted or announced plans in recent years to move forward with their own digital taxes.

The Biden administration has asked countries to immediately drop their digital taxes and has prepared retaliatory tariffs on a wide swath of European goods, including cheese, wine and clothing. As part of the global tax negotiations, countries have said they are willing to do so in exchange for additional tax on the largest and most profitable multinational enterprises, those with profit margins of at least 10 percent, that would be based on where their goods or services were sold, even if they had no physical presence there.

France, Europe’s biggest proponent of a digital tax, had no comment Monday. Its finance minister, Bruno Le Maire, had said during the weekend that France would legally commit to withdrawing its digital services tax only after an agreement was in effect, which is unlikely to happen before 2023.

In remarks at the meeting on Monday, Ms. Yellen emphasized the importance of a close relationship between the United States and the European Union and underscored the importance of the global tax agreement that she has been helping to broker. She argued that a deal over a global minimum tax would help European nations make important investments in their economies and reduce inequality.

“Long-run fiscal sustainability is critically important, which is one of the reasons why we need to continue working collectively to implement a global minimum tax of at least 15 percent, in line with the commitment the G20 made just days ago,” Ms. Yellen said. “We hope all E.U. member states will join the consensus and the European Union will move forward on this issue at E.U. level.”

Categories
Politics

U.S. officers arrive in Haiti, key suspect arrested in assassination plot

Haitian citizens hold up their passports as they gather outside the U.S. embassy in Tabarre, Haiti, on July 10, 2021, seeking asylum after the assassination of President Jovenel Moise, explaining that there is too much uncertainty in the country and them for their fear of life. Publicity.

Valerie Bäriswyl | AFP | Getty Images

Five days after the assassination of President Jovenel Moise, a delegation of US officials is arrested in Haiti to assess the political and security situation in the Caribbean.

The White House confirmed Monday that a delegation of officials from the National Security Council and Homeland Security, State and Justice departments had met with Haiti’s interim leaders and the national police to respond to their requests for security assistance and the investigation on Moise’s murder.

The arrival of the US delegation follows the arrest of a man of Haitian descent from Florida who is reportedly a prime suspect in Moise’s murder at his private residence in Port-au-Prince on Wednesday.

The State Department confirmed Monday that a third U.S. citizen was arrested after the attack, but declined to provide further information on privacy concerns. Instead, the department referred the Haitian authorities for details of the arrest.

Haitian police said they had arrested Christian Emmanuel Sanon, who had entered Haiti on a private plane “with the intention of assuming the Haitian presidency.” Sanon, who is in his early sixties, has been described as having played a pivotal role in the assassination, with Haitian police finding he was the “first person the attackers called” after the president was shot dead.

The New York Times and the Miami Herald reported that Sanon is a doctor in Florida.

The U.S. delegation’s arrival also comes after White House officials told NBC News on Friday that the U.S. has no plans to deploy troops to protect critical infrastructure, amid reports Haitian officials asked for such assistance. Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said over the weekend the Department of Defense is looking into the Haitian request for troops, but the US is mainly focused on the investigation.

“I don’t know if we are now at a point where we can definitely say that what is happening there is putting our national security at risk,” Kirby told Fox News on Sunday. “But of course we value our Haitian partners. We value stability and security in this country.”

The US delegation met with Haiti’s interim leaders to promote free and fair elections, National Security Council spokeswoman Emily Horne said in a White House press release. U.S. and Haitian officials also checked the security of the country’s critical infrastructure, Horne said.

“In all of their meetings, the delegation has pledged to support the Haitian government in its pursuit of justice in this case and to reaffirm the United States’ support for the Haitian people at this difficult time,” said Horne.

CNBC policy

Read more about CNBC’s political coverage:

On Friday, the State Department confirmed that two US citizens were arrested by Haitian police after the attack, but declined to comment.

Haitian police on Friday identified the American suspects as James Solages and Joseph Vincent, both of Haitian descent. You are among at least 20 suspects arrested by Haitian police so far, along with 18 Colombians.

Moise had faced violent protests for months before he was murdered. Opposition leaders accused him of increasing his power even after his term ended in February and called for his resignation.

Opposition leaders and their supporters pointed to Moise’s approval of decrees restricting a court’s powers to review government contracts and creating an intelligence agency that would only report to him. They also opposed his plans to hold a constitutional referendum that would strengthen the presidency in the country.