Categories
Politics

Texas sues 4 battleground states in Supreme Court docket over ‘illegal election outcomes’

Texas Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton announced Tuesday a lawsuit in the U.S. Supreme Court to invalidate the results of the presidential election results in four major swing states that helped defeat Democrat Joe Biden President Donald Trump secure.

The unusual lawsuit, filed directly with the Supreme Court, alleges that “unlawful election results” in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Wisconsin, and Michigan – all won by Biden – should be declared unconstitutional.

Legal experts were quick to dismiss the case as a political theater with no precedent in American history.

The filing argues that these states used the coronavirus pandemic as an excuse to unlawfully change their electoral rules “through executive fiat or amicable lawsuits which weakened the integrity of the ballot papers”.

“All electoral college votes cast by such presidential voters appointed” in these states “cannot be counted,” Texas urges the Supreme Court to rule.

The Lone Star State’s attempt to devalue other states’ electoral votes follows a series of long-term legal challenges with similar goals that have been brought to court by Trump’s campaign and other lawyers. These lawsuits have repeatedly failed to invalidate the ballots cast for Biden.

The allegations in the Texas lawsuit “are false and irresponsible,” Georgia Deputy Secretary of State Jordan Fuchs said in a fiery statement shortly after Paxton announced legal action.

“Texas claims that there are 80,000 forged signatures on postal ballots in Georgia, but they don’t bring up a single person to whom this happened. That’s because it didn’t,” Fuchs said.

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel called the suit a “publicity stunt” and “below the dignity” of Paxton’s office. Josh Kaul, the Wisconsin attorney general, said in a statement the case was “really embarrassing.”

Suffrage experts also quickly dismissed the likelihood that the nine Supreme Court justices would open the case. Paul Smith, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center who argued over proxy cases in the Supreme Court, said the case was “insane”.

“Pennsylvania and the rest of the world have a whole system of voting through the election – that’s all,” said Smith, who also serves as vice president of litigation and strategy for the Justice Center for Impartial Campaigns. “I don’t think the Supreme Court will be interested.”

The professor added that Texas may have difficulty proving that it has grounds for action that are legally known as “standing”.

“It is completely unprecedented for any state to claim in the Supreme Court that other states’ votes were cast incorrectly – that never happened,” he said. “What is the violation of the state of Texas because Pennsylvania’s votes were cast for Mr. Biden instead of Mr. Trump? There is no connection there.”

Rick Hasen, an electoral law expert at the University of California at Irvine, wrote on his popular legal blog that the lawsuit was “utter rubbish,” and also denied the idea that Texas stood, noting that “it has no say like other states vote for voters. “

Paxton wrote in the letter that Texas stands because of its interest in which party controls the Senate, which it says “represents the states”.

“While Americans are probably more concerned with who is elected president, states have a clear interest in who is elected vice president and who can thus cast the decisive vote in the Senate,” he wrote.

“This violation is particularly acute in 2020, when a Senate majority often maintains a tie for the vice president as the balance between the Georgia elections in January is nearly the same – and may be the same depending on the outcome of the Georgia runoffs.” political parties, “added Paxton.

The lawsuit against the four states ends with a critical deadline in the electoral certification process known as the “Safe Harbor” threshold. Thereafter, Congress is forced to accept the states’ certified results.

Six days later, the electoral college voters will cast their votes, marking Biden’s victory. The lawsuit also calls on the Supreme Court to extend the December 14 deadline “so that these investigations can be completed”.

In most cases, the Supreme Court hears only lower court cases that have been appealed. In cases between two or more states, however, the court originally has jurisdiction. Usually four judges have to agree to hear a case.

The lawsuit comes when Paxton faces a criminal investigation by the FBI into alleged efforts to help a wealthy campaign donor. The investigation was confirmed by The Associated Press after seven senior lawyers in Paxton’s office accused authorities in September that Paxton was guilty of abuse of his office.

All seven have since been fired, on leave or resigned, which has led several of them to file whistleblower lawsuits. Paxton has denied wrongdoing.

The case is not the first on election to reach the judges, although the court has not yet made a substantial decision on either side. In another lawsuit that the court may soon weigh, Pennsylvania’s Republican Representative Mike Kelly, an ally of Trump, is challenging virtually all of the state’s postal ballot papers and asking the court to nullify millions of votes.

Biden is expected to win 306 electoral college votes – 36 more than needed to beat Trump, who is said to receive 232 such votes.

But Trump refuses to allow Biden. The president, more than a month after election day, continues to falsely insist that he has won the race while promoting a wide range of unproven conspiracy theories allegedly pointing to election or election fraud.

The president is also pressuring swing state officials to take action to discard the results of their elections. Trump has heavily criticized Republican Georgia Governor Brian Kemp, furiously demanding that he convene a special session of the Peach State Legislature to appoint pro-Trump voters.

Trump has personally reached out to Kemp and Pennsylvania House spokesman Bryan Cutler, according to Washington Post reports. In November, Trump received Michigan Republican lawmakers for a meeting at the White House. These lawmakers said after the event that they had no plans to replace Biden’s voters.

Even ahead of the election, Trump predicted that the Supreme Court would likely rule the results of the race and urged the GOP-controlled Senate to bank Justice Amy Coney Barrett in time.

However, in recent weeks, Trump has admitted that he is unlikely to turn the 2020 election results in court on its head as his legal challenges have stalled.

“Well, the problem is that getting to the Supreme Court is difficult,” Trump told Fox News last month in his first full interview since his November 3rd defeat.

“I have the best lawyers in the Supreme Court, attorneys who want to discuss the case when it gets there. They said, ‘It’s very hard to get a case up there,'” Trump added. “Can you imagine Donald Trump, President of the United States, filing a case and I probably can’t get a case.”

Categories
Politics

The Suburbs Helped Elect Biden. Can They Give Democrats the Senate, Too?

DECATUR, Ga. – President Trump based his re-election on a very specific vision of the American suburb: a 2020 edition of Mayfield’s “Leave It to Beaver,” in which residents are white, reject minorities and prioritize their economic well-being any other concerns.

The bet lagged far behind. Mr Trump lost ground with suburban voters across the country. And especially in Georgia, where rapidly changing demographics have made it the country’s most racially diverse political battlefield, his pitch was at odds with reality.

From the inner suburbs around Atlanta to the traditionally conservative suburbs, Democrats benefited from two big changes: blacks, Latinos, and Asians moving to formerly white communities, and an increase in the number of white, highly educated moderates and conservatives who pissed off have become on Mr. Trump.

These factors helped make President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. the first Democrat to win Georgia since 1992. And the January Senate runoff election will see if those Biden voters supported his agenda or simply tried to remove a uniquely divisive incumbent.

Although Mr Trump will not be voting next month, he is very much involved in the race and, despite being chastised at the ballot box, has not moderated his message. The hope, to some extent, is that the pitch, which fell short with suburban voters last month, works when it comes to democratic scrutiny of the Senate.

“Quite simply, you will decide whether your children will grow up in a socialist country or if they will grow up in a free country,” Trump told the crowd at a rally on Saturday in Valdosta, Ga. “And I will tell you.” If you do, the socialist is just the beginning for these people. These people want to go further than socialism. You want to go into a communist form of government. “

Mr Trump stood up for Republican Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler, each with different political brands that could pose a challenge to the Democrats. It’s a challenge that Democrats are trying to tackle, especially among suburban voters, by putting Mr Trump in the spotlight.

Jon Ossoff, the Democratic candidate who ended up about two percentage points behind Mr Perdue and sent his race to a runoff, makes this claim at almost every campaign freeze: if the Senate stays in Republican hands, it will block the change Georgia voted for when Mr. Biden chose it.

Carolyn Bourdeaux is the only Democrat to flip a house district this year. She won in the northeast suburbs of Atlanta and, like Mr. Biden, took on her background as an ideologically moderate, bipartisan deal-maker.

“The Biden effect was likely shared ticket voters,” she said.

Runoff elections, she said, are about turnout, not bipartisan voters kicking a president out.

“You get your people to vote,” she said. “One of the things you need is a real, robust base field operation.”

Ms. Bourdeaux’s victory – and Mr Biden’s – cracked a code for Democrats in the South and underscores the changed nature of the Atlanta suburban electorate that made the party successful. It was an effort initiated by neighborhood level organizers, accelerated by an unpopular president, and brought across the finish line due to changes in the inner suburbs of Atlanta and in the smaller towns of the state that showed significant fluctuations from Mr. Biden.

In Atlanta, which has long been known as the “Black Mecca” for its concentration of black wealth and political power, the proportion of white residents has grown steadily. In the suburbs, black residents who have moved outside and a diverse collection of newcomers have fueled democratic change. These include a growing Latino population, an influx of Americans from Asia, and graduate white voters who may have supported Mr Trump in 2016 but turned against him.

The result is a swing state in which the “typical” suburban voter can take many forms. There’s Kim Hall, a 56-year-old woman who moved from Texas to the suburb of Cobb County eight years ago and attended a rally for Mr. Ossoff in Kennesaw. And Ali Hossain, a 63-year-old doctor who brags about his children and takes care of the economy; He attended an event for Mr. Ossoff in Decatur. He is also a Bangladeshi immigrant who has started organizing for state and national candidates.

“Asian and South Asian – we’re growing up here,” said Hossain. “This time it was history. When I went to the early voting, I saw thousands of people in line. People have had enough of Trump. “

In Henry County, about 30 miles southeast of Atlanta, Mr. Biden improved his party’s performance nearly five-fold in 2016. Four years ago, Hillary Clinton defeated Mr. Trump by four percentage points. In 2020, Mr. Biden won with more than 20 points.

Michael Burns, chairman of the Henry County Democratic Party, said he expected interest to decline from the general election to the runoff election. Instead, he has been overwhelmed by investment by national groups and more local organizers than he knows how to handle.

For the runoff election, “we had to turn away volunteers,” said Mr. Burns.

This is part of a bigger shift, said Robert Silverstein, a Democratic political strategist who has worked on several races in Georgia. Some believe that suburban voters are generally temperate and white, and not members of the party’s diverse base or progressives. Mr Silverstein said that in order for the Democrats to win the runoff elections in January and keep winning in places like Georgia, they need to both recharge and convince.

He noted that in 1992, when Bill Clinton ran the state, more affluent suburbs in Atlanta were “blood red”. Today, he said, the coalitions are very different.

Still, the patchwork quilt that made the Democratic Coalition possible in 2020 is nascent and fragile, and could be defeated by an energetic Republican electorate. Both Democratic Senate candidates must perform better in November when Rev. Dr. Raphael Warnock defeated a divided Republican field and Mr. Ossoff ran tightly behind Mr. Biden.

Republicans are confident that their grassroots will emerge and that the prospect of a unified democratic government under Mr Biden would put off some conservatives who fear fiscal and cultural change.

The location of their campaign events is an indication of their priorities: Republicans have largely stayed away from metropolitan Atlanta to focus on increasing voter turnout in more rural parts of the state. Both candidates met with President Trump in Valdosta on Saturday. The city, which is near Florida and has a large military and naval community, is three hours geographically from Atlanta, but even further in terms of pace and culture.

Democrats hope Mr Trump’s involvement will spark a backlash that will help them cement voting in the suburbs. Last week, in a steady stream of public events, Mr Ossoff hammered Republicans’ response to the coronavirus pandemic against Asian American voters in Decatur, a town in DeKalb County near Atlanta. During an event near a local university in Cobb County, another changing suburban area, he called Mr. Perdue a coward for refusing to debate him and also criticized Ms. Loeffler.

“We run like Bonnie and Clyde against political corruption in America,” said Ossoff.

Some Georgia Republicans have privately voiced discomfort at Ms. Loeffler and Mr. Perdue, who have teamed up closely with Mr. Trump and have all but given up contact with the moderate center in favor of an all-base turnout strategy.

Whit Ayres, a veteran Republican pollster in Georgia, said the erosion of Republicans in the inner suburbs – and to a lesser extent in the Conservative suburbs – had weakened the advantage Republicans had in runoff elections in the past. While white evangelicals and religious conservatives remain a core of the Republican base and make up a portion of the suburban electorate, some Republicans fear that such themed voters could be deterred by Senators’ willingness to delve into Trump-induced conspiracy theories, misinformation.

Mr Ayres said both sides had hurdles to overcome before January. Republicans have a president who sows discord within their party, and Democrats need to mobilize communities that normally held non-presidential elections. You cannot rely on the same coalition that emerged in November.

“Are they now permanent democratic voters? No, not at all, ”he said. “They are in transition and have been deterred in large part by the behavior of the president.”

Both the Democratic candidates and the Democratic Party of State and outside groups have struggled daily to register and mobilize voters – again. Democrats have also taken note of polls showing Mr Ossoff is worse off than Dr Perdue against Mr Perdue. Warnock against Mrs. Loeffler.

Few expect the decline to be significant enough that the parties will end up sharing the Senate seats. Far more likely are two Democratic victories or two Republican wins, a contest that depends on whether Liberals can compete with a energetic Conservative electorate that has often been insurmountable in low-turnout elections in the state.

“In any case, the demographics are changing. And the whites, the better educated voters in Fulton and Cobb counties, turned very quickly against Trump, ”said Democratic strategist Silverstein. “As a democratic agent, I hope it stays that way. But that’s the challenge here. There are still plenty of Republicans in these suburbs. “

Last week in Alpharetta, north of Atlanta, a “Stop the Steal” protest underscored the state’s chaotic political landscape and sent a mixed message to voters in the suburbs.

“We’re not going to vote on any other machine made by China on January 5th,” said L. Lin Wood, the attorney who has become a conservative hero in recent weeks by exposing the president’s unsubstantiated claims Electoral fraud repeated. He urged Mr. Perdue and Mrs. Loeffler to be more determined to overturn the election.

At Mr Ossoff’s event in Kennesaw, some of his supporters found statements such as Mr Wood’s concern and a sign that every part of their state – the cities, suburbs and rural areas – is changing in ways that show that Georgians are are further apart than ever before.

Tamekia Bell, a 39-year-old who had returned to the northwestern suburb of Smyrna after years in the Washington area, said it was up to voters who delivered for Mr Biden in November to deliver again.

“We feel that hope,” said Ms. Bell. “It won’t mean anything if Biden comes in there and can’t do anything.”

Categories
Politics

Trump to signal Covid-19 vaccine government order prioritizing People

United States President Donald Trump speaks during a ceremony to present wrestler Dan Gable with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on December 7, 2020.

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

President Donald Trump is expected to sign an executive order on Tuesday to ensure that U.S. efforts to help other countries vaccinate their populations against Covid-19 are given a lower priority than domestic vaccinations.

In a call to reporters Monday afternoon, a senior administration official described the order primarily as “an affirmation of the President’s commitment to America First.” Additionally, the command is instructing a handful of government agencies, including the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development, to work together to help international partners and allies obtain Covid vaccines, the official said.

CNBC has not examined the proposed text of the Executive Ordinance, which could prove largely symbolic. The plans for the Executive Order have already been announced by Fox News.

A administration official told NBC News Monday that the schedule for providing foreign aid will be supply and demand, but is expected to begin in the second quarter. President-elect Joe Biden will take office on Jan. 20 and is likely to shape his own policy for the receipt and distribution of Covid-19 vaccines, potentially limiting the impact of Trump’s command.

Trump is expected to sign the order after making remarks at the start of a Covid-19 summit in the White House on Tuesday, a senior administration official said Monday. The event will include meetings with administrative officials and drug distributors who will discuss the process of screening and distributing vaccine candidates, the official said.

Trump has largely ignored the growing coronavirus crisis over the past few weeks despite a surge in infections and a rising death toll exceeding 2,000 deaths a day, instead focusing on legal efforts to scrap the November presidential election results .

However, the signing will take place at a particularly critical stage in vaccine development.

Trump will sign the order just days before Thursday’s Food and Drug Administration meeting to review a promising vaccine from Pfizer and German drug maker BioNTech.

This vaccine can be approved for use by the end of this week. The FDA will meet on December 17th to discuss another Moderna candidate.

While some particularly at-risk Americans may be vaccinated soon after the vaccines are approved, officials warn that it will be months before anyone who wants a vaccine gets one.

Minister of Health and Human Services Alex Azar predicted on Sunday that vaccines are unlikely to be available to everyone applying for a vaccine by the second quarter.

The Trump administration signed a deal this summer to buy 100 million doses of Pfizer’s vaccine, if it works, enough to supply 50 million Americans.

On Monday afternoon, the New York Times reported that the government had rejected an offer from Pfizer for additional doses at the time.

The Times reported, citing unnamed people familiar with the matter, that the company may have limited vaccines supply due to its commitments to other countries and may not be able to supply additional vaccines to the US until June.

A spokesman for HHS, pressured by the Times whether the government missed the opportunity to buy more of Pfizer’s vaccine, said: “We are confident that we will receive 100 million doses of Pfizer’s vaccine, as in our contract agreed and beyond that we have five other vaccine candidates. “

A Pfizer spokesman told the Times that “the company cannot comment on confidential discussions with the US government.”

The White House and HHS did not immediately provide details of the executive order. Pfizer and BioNTech did not respond to emails seeking comment.

Subscribe to CNBC Pro for the live TV stream, deep insights and analysis of how to invest during the next president’s term.

Categories
Politics

Xavier Becerra Brings Environmental Justice to Forefront

Esther Portillo, interim executive director of the Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice, one of the groups involved in the fight against San Bernardino, said winning would not mean stopping development. Instead, she said, it would be “to look closely at the environmental impact we are going to have and minimize that impact as much as possible”.

Although jobs are usually the biggest selling point for new developments, a union chapter, Teamsters local 1932, has joined the fight against airport expansion. Randy Korgan, the local’s secretary and treasurer, said, “Well, bring the jobs with you, but make sure you deal with the environmental and community impacts – make sure these people have good benefits that they will be able to live and buy houses in the area. “

The court of appeal for the ninth circuit will hear the airport’s case as early as February.

The attorney general’s involvement in local disputes can upset those who firmly support the development. Steve Brandau, a Fresno district manager, served on the Fresno City Council during some heated dispute over camp expansion plans. “It’s crazy that the AG’s office, Attorney General Becerra, is stepping in and coming down even harder than the local lawyers,” he said. Citing a long-standing conservative refrain, he said that in the long run, such activities “result in business being completely out of state”.

Mr. Mataka acknowledged the friction in Fresno. “They thought we weren’t on our trail,” he said. “Unfortunately, the attorney general is responsible for enforcing California’s Environmental Quality Act. We were on our track. “

Mr Becerra said his office was working carefully with the local government before ever filing a pleading on a case and was looking for ways to compromise. Some churches, he said, don’t understand that their old ways of doing business leave churches underserved. They say, “We did this 20 years ago, why can’t we do it now?” he said.

He cited his experience as a 12-year-old congressman when he argued that he saw the role as a negotiator rather than a fighter. “They’re always looking for voices,” he said, “even across the aisle. I don’t want people to be blind. “