Categories
Politics

Kevin McCarthy backs Supreme Court docket bid from Texas to overturn Biden wins

Kevin McCarthy (R-CA), Chairman of the U.S. Minority Group, speaks during a press conference with fellow U.S. Capitol Republicans on December 10, 2020 at the U.S. Capitol in Washington.

Erin Scott | Reuters

Kevin McCarthy, minority chairman of the House of Representatives, R-Calif., Along with 125 other Republican Congressmen, supported the Texas Supreme Court’s longstanding lawsuit against Joe Biden’s proposed presidential victory on Friday.

McCarthy, the senior Republican in the House of Representatives and a close ally of President Donald Trump, was included in a letter from the “Friend of the Court,” presided over by Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., Urging the Supreme Court to To review the case filed by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton earlier this week.

Paxton’s case accused Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia and Wisconsin – four major swing states where Biden defeated Trump – of attesting “illegal election results”. Texas is asking the Supreme Court to state that the electoral college votes cast by voters in these four swing states “cannot be counted”.

The majority vote in the House’s GOP conference behind the Supreme Court offer to effectively reverse the outcome of the 2020 election came after all 50 states and Washington, DC confirmed their election results. Biden is expected to win 306 votes, compared to 232 for Trump.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., In a damning letter from her dear colleague, accused the Republicans of supporting the case of “electoral subversion that threatens our democracy”.

“This lawsuit is an act of GOP desperation that violates the principles enshrined in our American democracy,” wrote Pelosi.

“As members of Congress, we take a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution,” her letter said. “The Republicans are undermining the Constitution through their ruthless and fruitless assault on our democracy, which threatens to seriously undermine public confidence in our most sacred democratic institutions and slow our progress on the urgent challenges ahead.”

The Supreme Court has given no indication that it will hear the case and electoral law experts say the judges are highly unlikely to take him up. The unprecedented motion by one state to invalidate other states’ votes in a presidential election has never been granted.

Even so, the lawsuit was hyped up by Trump, who falsely claims he won re-election while refusing to admit Biden. Trump asked Wednesday to intervene in Paxton’s case.

Numerous other states where Trump won the referendum have also indicated their support for Paxton’s lawsuit, as have dozens of seated Republican members of the House – a group that McCarthy is now a part of.

Though news outlets scheduled the election for Biden weeks earlier and had less than a week for voters in their respective states to cast their votes, many Republicans were reluctant to acknowledge that Biden had won the election.

McCarthy was asked directly on CNBC’s “Squawk Box” Thursday whether he would accept Biden’s win and refused to give a yes-or-no answer.

“Look, voters have to go through this and get this out,” McCarthy said in his response. “The President must ensure that every legal vote is counted, every recount is carried out and every complaint is made [is being] heard in court. Once that’s done I think the election will be over and the voters will make their choice. “

McCarthy was not included in an earlier amicus letter filed in court on Thursday, also headed by Johnson and signed by 106 members of the Republican House.

Johnson said on Twitter that the 20 additional Republicans added to his last letter to the court had previously been left out because of a “typographical error”.

– CNBC’s Jacob Pramuk contributed to this report.

Categories
Politics

‘An Indelible Stain’: How the G.O.P. Tried to Topple a Pillar of Democracy

On Saturday, Mr. Trump lost another court case as a Wisconsin federal judge, Judge Brett H. Ludwig, who was appointed to court by Mr. Trump this year, said his allegations “fail on legal and factual grounds.” The case has been dismissed with prejudice, which means that Mr Trump is prohibited from bringing cases for similar reasons in this district.

But civil rights lawyers saw the potential for permanent harm outside of the legal realm, where Republican efforts – and the lie that Mr Biden’s victory was the result of widespread fraud – definitely failed.

Republican lawmakers across the country are already considering new laws to make voting harder as they continue to falsely portray the expansion and ease of postal voting as shameful during the pandemic. Many of them see this year’s expanded voting ranks as bad for their party, despite the Republican successes further down the vote. Your consideration of new voting restrictions is an ongoing assault on the integrity of the voting system, with more false and debunked allegations.

“There is an anti-democratic virus that has spread in mainstream Republicanism among mainstream Republican elected officials,” said Dale Ho, director of the Voting Rights Project at ACLU. “And this loss of confidence in the machinery of democracy is much greater.” Problem than any single lawsuit. “

Indeed, following the Supreme Court ruling, the Texas Republican Party has called for secession by red states, whose attorneys general joined the Texas lawsuit.

“Perhaps law-abiding states should unite and form a union of states that adhere to the constitution,” said a statement by its chairman, Allen West. What followed was an observation Rush Limbaugh made earlier this week when he said, “I actually think we are leaning towards secession.”

Talk of secession came during a week when electoral officials from both political parties across the country said they had been threatened with threatening violence, including family members, for confessing to Mr Biden’s victory.

Categories
Politics

Biden Cupboard nominees pledge to make use of federal powers to handle crises

US President-elect Joe Biden speaks to reporters as he announces candidates and candidates during a press conference at his interim headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware on December 11, 2020.

Facebook Facebook Logo Log in to Facebook to connect with Mike Segar Reuters

WASHINGTON – President-elect Joe Biden introduced several of his candidates to head domestic affairs agencies on Friday, highlighting how members of his cabinet would use the powers of the federal government to help Americans in need.

Accompanied by Vice President-elect Kamala Harris at the event at a Wilmington, Delaware hotel, Biden began making brief remarks on the coronavirus pandemic before introducing his candidate to lead the Department of Agriculture, Tom Vilsack.

He also introduced his nominee for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Rep. Marcia Fudge, D-Ohio; his candidate for Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Denis McDonough; and for US sales representative Katherine Tai.

Biden also announced that Susan Rice, a former national security adviser to President Barack Obama, has agreed to serve as director of the White House Home Affairs Council, a powerful position in the west wing that will give Rice broad influence on a number of issues .

Taken together, Biden said his candidates bring “deep experience and bold new thinking” to federal agencies and the White House. “Most of all, they know how the government can and should work for all Americans.”

Biden stressed how any member of his cabinet would help Americans face multiple overlapping crises: the coronavirus pandemic, a deep recession, and an impending spike in evictions and food insecurity.

For example, Fudge will “use every lever at her disposal to help the millions of Americans facing eviction – trying to pay their mortgage and find their way through this crisis,” Biden said.

U.S. Representative Marcia Fudge speaks on December 11, 2020 after being named Secretary of Housing and Urban Development by U.S. President-elect Joe Biden (R) in Wilmington, Delaware.

Jim Watson | AFP | Getty Images

And Vilsack “knows the full range of resources available in the [Department of Agriculture] Get immediate assistance to those most in need and address crises in rural America. “

The nominees also made brief comments, emphasizing how various federal agencies would help a nationwide recovery from the coronavirus pandemic.

Rice spoke last and tied everything together.

US President-elect Joe Biden (R) watches as former National Security Advisor to Obama Susan Rice makes remarks after being unveiled as Biden’s decision to present his home affairs council on December 11, 2020 at the Queen Theater in Wilmington, Delaware, to direct.

Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

“Today we face a profound series of crises: a relentless pandemic, a troubled economy, urgent demands for racial justice and justice, a climate that needs healing, a democracy that needs to be repaired, and a world that needs renewed Americans for leadership “, she said.

“Our top priorities will be to help end the pandemic and revitalize an economy that cares for all, brings dignity and humanity to our broken immigration system, promotes racial justice, justice and civil rights for all, and ensures that healthcare is affordable and to be accessible and educate and train Americans to compete and thrive in the 21st century, “Rice continued.

“I firmly believe that we can all move up or down together – absolutely all of us.”

Just 40 days before his inauguration, Biden is putting together a cabinet that is unprecedented in its racial and gender diversity. Tai, Fudge, and Rice are all women of color.

Earlier this week, Biden announced that retired General Lloyd Austin was his decision to run the Pentagon, making Austin the first black man to ever be appointed Secretary of Defense.

However, Biden has come under heavy pressure from civil rights groups to add even more diversity to his cabinet, particularly nominating an Asian American for a top position in the cabinet.

On Friday, several groups representing Asian Americans and Pacific islanders released a joint statement criticizing “the remarkable absence of Asian American cabinet secretaries” in the Biden administration.

“President-elect Biden is well on the way to being the first president in over 20 years to fail to nominate an Asian American for the role of cabinet secretary in his administration,” said the statement made by the National Council Asia Pacific has submitted to CNBC Americans.

But Asian Americans aren’t the only group currently pressuring Biden to be more prominent in his White House: on Tuesday, he and Harris met with leaders of older civil rights groups, including the NAACP and the National Urban League.

They called on Biden to create a new position in the White House, a racial justice advisor who should be tasked with coordinating government-wide efforts to combat systemic racism.

Biden has so far refused to comment on the specific recommendations and inquiries he receives from lawyers. But he told CNN last week, “Every advocacy group out there is pushing for more and more of what they want. That is their job.”

However, in the same interview, Biden also defended his cabinet selection, noting that they were already “the most diverse cabinet ever announced in American history”.

Categories
Politics

In Attempting for a Numerous Administration, Biden Finds One Group’s Acquire is One other’s Loss

WASHINGTON – The NAACP chief had a blunt warning for President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. when Mr Biden met with civil rights leaders in Wilmington this week.

The nomination of Tom Vilsack, a former Agriculture Secretary in the Obama administration, to re-head the department would anger black farmers and threaten Democratic hopes of winning two runoffs in the Georgia Senate, Derrick Johnson told Biden.

“Former Secretary Vilsack could have a catastrophic impact on Georgia voters,” Johnson warned, according to an audio recording of the meeting received from The Intercept. Mr Johnson said Mr Vilsack’s sudden dismissal of a popular black department official in 2010 was still too raw for many black farmers, despite Mr Vilsack’s subsequent apology and offer to reinstate them.

Mr. Biden immediately ignored the warning. Within hours, his decision to appoint Mr. Vilsack to head the Department of Agriculture had been leaked and angered the very activists he had just met.

The episode was just part of a concerted campaign by activists demanding that the president-elect keep his promise that his government “will look like America.” At their meeting, Mr. Johnson and the group also asked Mr. Biden to appoint a black attorney general and to designate a White House citizen a “Tsar.”

The pressure is on the Democratic-elected president, even if his efforts to ensure ethnic and gender diversity are well beyond those of President Trump, who did not prioritize diversity and often chose his top officials for what they looked like. And it comes from all sides.

When Mr. Biden nominated the first black man to run the Pentagon this week, women cried badly. LGBTQ advocates are disappointed that Mr Biden has not yet appointed a prominent member of their ward to his cabinet. Latino and Asian groups fish for some of the same jobs.

Allies of the president-elect discover that he has already made history. In addition to appointing retired General Lloyd J. Austin III as the first black Secretary of Defense, he has selected a Cuban immigrant to head the Department of Homeland Security, the first female Treasury Secretary, a black woman in Housing and Urban Development, and the son of Mexican immigrants as secretary for health and human services.

But the introduction of Mr. Biden’s cabinet and the White House picks has created fear among many elements of the party. While some say he appears to be handicapped by pressure groups, others point out that his earliest decisions included four white men who are close confidants to serve as chief of staff, secretary of state, national security advisor, and his top political adviser, leading the way Leaves impression that Mr. Biden planned to rely on the same cadre of aides he had had for years.

“Additional dismay,” said a Washington advocacy chairman about Mr. Biden’s initial decisions.

Glynda C. Carr, president of Higher Heights for America, a political action committee dedicated to the election of progressive black women, said it was a feeling of defeat that Mr Biden, as a group, had not given black women key jobs in his cabinet had hoped.

Susan Rice, a black woman who was the United Nations Ambassador and National Security Advisor to the Obama administration, was considered a candidate for Secretary of State. Instead, she will become director of Mr. Biden’s Home Affairs Council, a position that does not require Senate endorsement. Ohio representative Marcia L. Fudge, another black woman, was nominated as Secretary of Agriculture for which she and her allies had been pushing for Secretary of Housing and Urban Development.

Both government and agricultural jobs went to white men instead.

“For me, I would certainly want Susan Rice to be on the team instead of not on the team,” Ms. Carr said, but it was “disappointing” to see Ms. Rice in a position that wasn’t cabinet level. “We have to keep pushing,” she added.

Women’s groups were also disappointed with Mr. Biden’s decision to select General Austin as Secretary of Defense to replace Michèle Flournoy, a long-time senior Pentagon official who has been the leading candidate for the job for months.

It didn’t help Mr Biden’s case with women that he also selected Xavier Becerra, California’s attorney general, as secretary for health and human resources to New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, who was selected as the likely candidate for the job just days before she was was passed over.

General Austin’s election didn’t convince civil rights activists like Rev. Al Sharpton, either, who firmly believes the need for a black attorney general, or at least someone with a background in voting rights enforcement.

In an interview following his meeting with Mr Biden, Mr Sharpton was open about when he would feel satisfied that the president-elect had kept his promise of diversity.

“If we can get a real attorney general with a credible background on civil rights and voting enforcement,” he said. “If we get a credible person with a real background in work and education I would be ready to say that I am ready to accept some setbacks or setbacks” in other positions.

Mr Sharpton was also clear about whom he would not accept. He said black activists would not support a position for Rahm Emanuel, the former chief of staff to President Barack Obama, whose heir as mayor of Chicago he convicted of Emanuel’s handling of the 2014 murder of Laquan McDonald, a black teenager, a police officer.

Other activists are equally determined to prevent the president-elect from nominating anyone they consider too conservative and shy to face racial injustices, or who are too closely associated with the corporate world.

That month, a group of over 70 environmental groups wrote to the Biden transition team calling on the president-elect not to appoint Mary Nichols, California’s climate change regulator and one of the country’s most experienced climate change leaders, to lead the Environmental Protection Agency .

“We would like to draw your attention to Ms. Nichols’ dire track record in combating environmental racism,” the groups wrote, saying she promoted California’s cap and trade program to reduce greenhouse gases at the expense of local pollutants that are disproportionately affected Minority communities.

The transition of the president

Updated

Apr. 11, 2020, 9:07 am ET

People on the verge of transition say Ms. Nichols may lose her job to Heather McTeer Toney, an EPA regional administrator in the Obama administration who is a top choice of liberal activists and would be the second black woman to do so directs the agency.

Adam Green, founder of the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, said liberal organizations were largely satisfied with some of Mr. Biden’s recommendations, including Ron Klain, one of his longtime advisers, as chief of staff and Janet L. Yellen, a former Federal Reserve chairman, treasury secretary to be.

But he said Mr. Biden had not selected a progressive movement champion, adding, “Those at the top of the spear are not in the greatest positions yet.”

And candidates like Mr Vilsack, who Mr Green has been accused of having too many connections with large agricultural companies, are a disappointment, he said.

“Agriculture offers so many opportunities, especially if we want to make a profit in the Midwest,” he said. But that would require a secretary willing to “fight big farming for family farmers”.

As Mr. Biden ponders his election as Secretary of the Interior, a coalition of Democrats, Native Americans, Liberal activists and Hollywood celebrities are pushing him to replace Senator Tom Udall, Democrat of New Mexico, with Representative Deb Haaland of New Mexico, an Indian woman appoint and a longtime friend of Mr. Biden.

On Thursday evening a group of liberal activists, including the Sunrise Movement, one of the best-known groups on the left, wrote to white Mr Udall asking him to get out of the running for a job his father Stewart L. Udall had among the Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson.

“It would not be right for two Udalls to head the Home Office, charged with administering public land, natural resources, and the nation’s tribal trust responsibilities in front of a single Native American,” they wrote.

On Capitol Hill, progressive Democratic lawmakers like New York City Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez reserve judgment on Mr Biden’s decisions.

“I think one of the things I look for when I see all of these tips put together is what is the agenda?” she told reporters.

During his meeting with the activists, Mr Biden resisted the idea that his nominations suggest that he is not pursuing a progressive agenda.

“I don’t have a stamp on my head that says ‘I’m progressive and I’m AOC,'” said Mr Biden, referring to Ms. Ocasio-Cortez. “But I have more records of how you get things done in the United States Congress than anyone else you know.”

The comments reflect what people familiar with Mr. Biden’s thinking are saying is his growing frustration with the public and private print campaigns.

However, promises to stakeholders during his campaign are not forgotten.

Alphonso David, president of the human rights campaign, a group devoted to advancing the interests of the LGBTQ community, said Mr Biden assured him months ago that an LGBTQ person would be appointed to a cabinet-level position that was confirmed by the Senate needs – something that never happened.

“This is an important barrier to breaking. We need to make sure that all communities are represented, ”said David. Like other activists, Mr David was reluctant to judge Mr Biden until he had finished selecting his cabinet.

“It’s too early to say,” he said. But he added a warning that Mr Biden has heard all too often over the past few days.

“If we don’t have the variety of representation that Joe Biden has promised and that we are looking for,” he said, “there will be a big disappointment.”

Yet the President-elect’s defenders are equally direct.

“He selected the first woman and the first black vice president. First Minister of Finance. First Black Secretary of Defense, ”said Philippe Reines, a veteran Democratic agent and former top adviser to Hillary Clinton. “But if you can’t trust Joe Biden to keep doing the right thing and trying to choose the cabinet, you should do what he did: run for the presidency and win.”

Luke Broadwater, Coral Davenport, Lisa Friedman and Katie Glueck contributed to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Trump official Mick Mulvaney’s hedge fund in search of no less than $1 million from buyers

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, December 10, 2019.

Al Drago | Reuters

Mick Mulvaney, former acting chief of staff to President Donald Trump, plans to raise at least $ 1 million from outside investors for his newly formed hedge fund.

Mulvaney, now representing the outgoing administration in Northern Ireland, and his business partner Andrew Wessel announced that they are aiming for this minimum amount in a CNBC first-examined filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

The filing gives fresh insight into Mulvaney’s Exegis Capital fund’s plans to operate in the post-Trump era. The SEC form was signed on December 1, weeks after Democrat Joe Biden was appointed president-elect.

Mulvaney, a former Republican Congressman from South Carolina, was also head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau within the Trump administration.

Investments appear to be in the direction of the fund limited partnership called Exegis Financial Sector Fund, the document says. The SEC form contains the same North Carolina address for the limited partnership and Exegis Capital. Mulvaney and Wessel’s names are both on the form.

The document also shows that Exegis is fundraising under the SEC’s 506 (b) rule. According to the SEC’s website, this rule allows companies to “raise unlimited funds and sell securities to an unlimited number of accredited investors.”

Mulvaney and Wessel, who have extensive experience as former portfolio managers at Sterling Capital Management in North Carolina, first announced the creation of the fund in an interview with S&P Global in August. They said at the time they wanted to invest in stocks in the small to mid-cap financial sector.

In an interview on Friday, Wessel confirmed that the $ 1 million was just the minimum they were asking investors. The hedge fund, he said, is trying to raise money from both “high net worth” and “very high net worth” individuals who may be worth at least $ 30 million.

Wessel declined to say who invested or who signaled interest in investing.

“The fundraiser is going well,” he said. “We have little interest from a number of high net worth individuals.” Wessel added that the fund had held numerous investor meetings both in person and through Zoom.

Wessel said that so far they have aimed to invest in small and mid-cap financials, with less of an emphasis on banks and interest in lenders and fintech companies.

Mulvaney’s role in the firm includes providing guidance to the best companies to invest in based on Exegis’ expectations for tighter regulation of the financial services industry under the Biden administration.

According to Wessel, Mulvaney’s experience in Washington – as acting director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, as director of the Office of Management and Budget, and as a member of the Financial Services Committee during his tenure in Congress – gives the firm a strong insight into the in-depth regulations it could provide for its business potential investments.

“For the Biden administration we are probably aiming for more regulation, not less, and we will choose our places there,” said Wessel of her investment tactics.

Wessel said Mulvaney approved the establishment of the fund with both the White House and the State Department and “he has not been to Ireland in a while”. He referred other questions about possible ethical hurdles Mulvaney may face to the former South Carolina congressman.

A State Department official told CNBC after the release that Mulvaney is considered a government special employee (SGE) and is limited to 130 calendar days of official work per year. He is not prohibited from looking for external employment, said the spokesman.

Mulvaney did not return a request for comment prior to posting.

Categories
Politics

Supreme Court docket Rejects Texas Lawsuit Difficult Biden’s Victory

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton responded with his own letter on Friday morning. “Whatever Pennsylvania’s definition of turmoil,” he wrote, “moving this court to heal grave threats to Texas Senate suffrage and the suffrage of its citizens in presidential elections affirms the Constitution, which is the opposite of turmoil . ” ”

Allegations that the election was tainted by widespread fraud have been rebutted by Mr Trump’s own Attorney General William P. Barr, who said this month the Justice Department had not uncovered election fraud “on a scale that could have changed the election. “

Some 20 Democratic-led states, in a brief endorsement of the four battlefield states, urged the Supreme Court to “reject Texas’s last-minute attempt to discard the results of a popular vote that is safely monitored and certified by its sister states. ”

Georgia, which won Mr Biden by less than 12,000 votes out of nearly five million votes cast, said in his letter that it had handled his election with integrity and care. “In this election cycle,” the letter said, “Georgia has done what the constitution was empowered to do: it implemented electoral processes, managed the election in the face of the logistical challenges posed by Covid-19, and confirmed and confirmed the election.” Results – over and over again. Even so, Texas sued Georgia. “

Even ahead of Election Day, Mr Trump and his Republican allies filed nearly five dozen lawsuits against the treatment, casting and counting of votes in courts in at least eight different states.

They generally lost these cases and often drew blistering reproaches from judges who heard them. Along the way, Mr Trump has not nearly overturned election results in a single state, let alone the minimum of three he would need to claim Mr Biden’s victory.

The first set of measures preceded the elections and was aimed at ending or rolling back the voting measures that states across the country had been taking to deal with the coronavirus crisis. In Texas, for example, Republicans were prosecuting a failed attempt in federal court to stop the drive-through vote in Harris County, home of Houston. A similar move was taken in Pennsylvania to prevent the state from accepting postal ballot papers received after election day.

Categories
Politics

Supreme Courtroom rejects Trump backed lawsuit that sought to overturn Biden election victory

United States President Donald Trump looks on during a ceremony to present wrestler Dan Gable with the Presidential Medal of Freedom in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC on December 7, 2020.

Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images

The United States Supreme Court on Friday rejected an offer tabled by Texas and backed by President Donald Trump in an attempt to undo Joe Biden’s election victories in key swing states of Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.

The ruling dealt a death blow to Trump’s desperate and unsuccessful efforts to undo Biden’s planned victory at the electoral college. It took three days for voters to cast their ballots in their respective states and for Biden’s victory to be finalized.

Suffrage experts said from the start that the lawsuit is unlikely to succeed. But Trump, who himself had applied to intervene in the case, had hyped Paxton’s lawsuit as “the big one”.

The court on Friday denied Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to file the lawsuit against the four battlefield states. The judges said Paxton didn’t have reasons to sue the other states over changes they made to their voting procedures amid the coronavirus pandemic.

“The Texas state’s application for permission to file a notice of appeal is denied due to a lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the court said.

“Texas has shown no judicial interest in the way any other state conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as in dispute.”

Trump, who appointed three judges to the nine-member court, had said ahead of the November 3rd election that he believed the Supreme Court would ultimately decide the race.

“I think it is very important that we have nine judges,” Trump said shortly after the death of the liberal judiciary Ruth Bader Ginsburg in September.

Biden spokesman Mike Gwin said in a statement on Friday evening that the court had “decided and quickly rejected the recent attack by Donald Trump and his allies on the democratic process.”

“This is no surprise – dozens of judges, election officials from both parties and Trump’s own attorney general have rejected his baseless attempts to deny that he lost the election,” said Gwin. “The clear and authoritative victory of President-elect Biden will be confirmed by the electoral college on Monday and sworn in on January 20th.”

The Texas lawsuit asked the Supreme Court to invalidate the election results of the four battlefield states by stating that their votes “cannot be counted” in the electoral college.

Biden’s victories in the four states, which together had 62 votes, had brought him over the 270-vote threshold required to secure the presidency. Biden is expected to win 306 votes, compared to 232 for Trump.

If Texas had won the lawsuit, it would have canceled Biden’s victory.

Two of the most conservative Supreme Court justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, said in brief disagreement that they allowed Paxton’s lawsuit to be filed, but added that they would “grant no other relief” requested in the case .

“In my view, there is no discretion to refuse to file a notice of appeal in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction,” Alito wrote in a statement backed by Thomas. “I would therefore grant the request to file the notice of appeal, but would not grant any other relief, and I do not express an opinion on any other subject.”

More than a dozen states in which Trump won the referendum filed briefs in support of Texas’s action. More than 120 Republican members of Congress, including House Minority Chairman Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Filed similar Friend of the Court letters shortly thereafter.

But about two dozen states and territories that Biden had won filed their own pleadings against the Texas appeal.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., In a damning letter from her dear colleague on Friday afternoon, accused the Republicans of supporting the case of “electoral subversion that threatens our democracy”.

“This lawsuit is an act of GOP desperation that violates the principles enshrined in our American democracy,” wrote Pelosi.

“As members of Congress, we take a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution,” her letter said. “The Republicans are undermining the Constitution through their ruthless and fruitless assault on our democracy, which threatens to seriously undermine public confidence in our most sacred democratic institutions and slow our progress on the urgent challenges ahead.”

Rudy Giuliani, the attorney who spearheaded Trump’s efforts to reverse Biden’s victory through legal proceedings, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Senator Ben Sasse, a Republican from Nebraska who has clashed with Trump, said in a statement that the Supreme Court has finally “closed the book on the nonsense.”

“Since election night, a lot of people have puzzled voters by turning the Kenyan birther guy. ‘Chavez carved the election out of the grave conspiracy theories,’ but any rule of law American should take comfort that the Colonel The court – including all three tips from President Trump – closed the book on the nonsense, “he said.

Michigan attorney general Dana Nessel, who represented her state against Paxton’s lawsuit, said the ruling was “an important reminder that we are a nation of laws, and while some may bow to the wishes of a single person, they will.” Courts don’t do this. “

NBC News legal analyst Benjamin Wittes noted that while Alito and Thomas opposed the decision, they likely would have opposed it on the matter.

Categories
Politics

Senate Sends Navy Invoice to Trump’s Desk, Spurning His Veto Menace

WASHINGTON – The Senate overwhelmingly passed a comprehensive military policy law on Friday to remove Confederate names from American military bases to clarify the measure for enactment and to keep them on President Trump’s desk despite his veto threats send.

The vote between 84 and 13 to pass the legislation reflected widespread support from both parties for the measure authorizing the payment of American troops and was intended to signal Mr Trump that lawmakers, including many Republicans, were determined to do the critical Passing the law, even if this may mean giving up the first right of veto of his presidency.

The margin exceeded the two-thirds majority required in both houses to force passage of the law on Mr Trump’s objections. The House also hit that threshold in passing the measure on Tuesday, increasing the prospect of a possible veto showdown in Mr Trump’s final weeks of office.

The scene that played out in the Senate on Friday underscored how the Republicans, who did not want to challenge the president on any other issue during his four-year term, were extraordinarily ready to break with Mr Trump over one of the party’s key orthodoxy – military strength project.

“I encourage all of us to do what we must to bring this bill to fruition,” said Senator James M. Inhofe, Republican of Oklahoma and Chairman of the Armed Forces Committee, to his colleagues in a speech from the ground. “There is no one in America who deserves more than our troops that are in danger, and we will make sure we are doing what is right for them.”

Thirteen senators, evenly spaced across party lines, voted against the bill, with Republicans supporting Mr Trump’s objections and Democrats chafing on the bill’s topline number. Three Senators, Lindsey Graham, Republican of South Carolina, Mike Rounds, Republican of South Dakota, and Kamala Harris, Democrat of California and vice president-elect, did not vote.

Congress has succeeded in passing the military law every year for 60 years. But Mr Trump has threatened to change that tradition, pledging to veto the legislation since the summer, even as his own party’s leaders privately pleaded with him to support it.

Mr Trump initially opposed a provision largely backed by lawmakers from both parties in both chambers that would strip the names of Confederate leaders from military bases. In the past few weeks his attention has shifted, demanding that the bill provide for an independent lifting of a legal shield for social media companies.

This demand, which was registered late in the legislative process, found little support from the legislators of both parties. They feel it is untenable to take an important, unrelated political move towards the defense law. They were hoping that strong voices in both chambers would convince Mr Trump to back off his threat of veto. However, so far the president has given no indication that he will do so.

The legislation includes a number of undisputed, bipartisan measures, including new benefits for tens of thousands of Vietnam-era veterans exposed to Agent Orange, a 3 percent increase in service member wages and an increase in remuneration for dangerous levies.

It would also take steps to slow or block Mr Trump’s planned withdrawal of American troops from Germany and Afghanistan, and it would make it difficult for the president to deploy military personnel on the southern border.

Legislation also directly addresses the racial justice protests sparked by the police killing black Americans, including George Floyd, this summer. All federal officials who enforce crowd control during protests and demonstrations would have to identify themselves and their authorities. And it includes the bipartisan move directing the Pentagon to begin renaming military bases named after Confederate leaders, a provision the Democrats fought to uphold.

If Mr. Trump were to enforce his threatened veto, the House would be the first to attempt an override.

Emily Cochrane contributes to the coverage.

Categories
Politics

Biden will journey to Georgia to spice up Democrats in Senate runoffs

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate and former Vice President Joe Biden speaks during a campaign stop in Atlanta, Georgia on October 27, 2020.

Brian Snyder | Reuters

WASHINGTON – President-elect Joe Biden will travel to Atlanta, Georgia on Tuesday to blunt for Democratic Senate candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock, his first campaign trip since he was elected president in November.

The stakes could hardly be higher: Ossoff and Warnock challenge incumbent Republican Sens. David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler in runoff elections on January 5th, the results of which determine which party controls the US Senate.

After the November elections, the Senate will initially consist of 50 Republicans, 46 Democrats and two independents who will meet with the Democrats. If Warnock and Ossoff both win their races, the Democrats will have 50 reliable votes, with Vice President-elect Kamala Harris casting a groundbreaking 51st vote.

With 51 votes in the Senate, Biden could realistically hope to pass some of his most comprehensive (and expensive) domestic policy proposals, including a massive green jobs program. He would also receive carte blanche endorsement for his candidates, which would greatly accelerate the pace at which a Biden government could take over the reins of federal bureaucracy.

Despite decades of Republican dominance in Georgian politics, Democrats have reason to be optimistic this year: Biden narrowly won Georgia’s referendum, a surprising victory that made him the first Democrat in more than 20 years to win the state in a presidential race .

However, there is no guarantee that Biden’s luck will repeat itself in the Senate races.

The poll averages currently show both races neck to neck. But Loeffler and Perdue benefit from the tenure and a historic advantage: Georgia has not sent a Democratic senator to Washington in a generation.

Democrats repeat the 2020 game book

With just under a month to go, the Democrats are repeating many of the tactics that worked to their advantage in November, emphasizing early voting, public health, and grassroots outreach.

Biden’s trip coincides with the start of the early voting, which begins Monday in Georgia. Democrats invest heavily in getting their voters down early instead of expecting people to queue at crowded polling stations on January 5th. These efforts are particularly urgent given the current surge in coronavirus, which is expected to peak early next year.

The Biden campaign hasn’t released the details of the event on Tuesday, but in the final weeks of the presidential campaign, Biden held drive-in rallies that attracted large crowds and kept people a safe distance from one another.

U.S. Senate Democratic nominees Jon Ossoff (R) and Raphael Warnock (L) wave at supporters during a rally in Marietta, Georgia on November 15, 2020.

Jessica McGowan | Getty Images

So far, the Democrats have not personally sent their party’s stars to Georgia in the runoff game, but have preferred to hold virtual events.

Former President Barack Obama, arguably the party’s biggest star, led a virtual rally with Ossoff and Warnock on Dec. 4, where he spoke openly to supporters that Biden’s national agenda was at stake.

The January results, Obama said, will “determine the course of the Biden presidency and whether Joe Biden and Kamala Harris can legally honor all of their commitments.”

“If you don’t have a majority when the Senate is controlled by Republicans who are more interested in disability and stagnation than progress and helping people, they can block almost anything,” Obama said.

Republicans flood the zone

While Democrats give priority to public health and early voting in the runoff elections, Republicans are taking a radically different approach: they flood the state with high-profile surrogate motherships while also cheering their grassroots voters by promoting false conspiracies, which President Donald Trump and not Biden was the rightful winner of the state’s referendum.

In the past few weeks, several popular Republican Senators have visited Georgia to promote Loeffler and Perdue: Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott from Florida, Tom Cotton from Arkansas, Joni Ernst from Iowa and Marsha Blackburn from Tennessee, and Senator-elect Bill Hagerty from Tennessee.

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Senator Steve Daines of Montana, and former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, all Republicans, are also reportedly planning to swing across the state in the coming days.

But no one embodies the Republican Party’s two-part strategy in Georgia more than Trump, who made the state a core part of his conspiracy theories about the presidential election – and his efforts to reverse the legitimate results.

Last weekend, Trump led a massive rally in Valdosta, Georgia that was allegedly a campaign event to empower Loeffler and Perdue. But the president spent much more time on the stage making his own grievances than he did about the two Republican senators. The participants were close together, hardly a mask in sight.

US President Donald Trump, First Lady Melania Trump and US Republican Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler arrive for a rally on December 5, 2020 in Valdosta, Georgia, USA.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

For nearly two hours, Trump vacillated insisting that fraud and corruption constituted a “stolen” victory in Georgia in the presidential election, begging his supporters to fight for him by voting in the state’s runoff on January 5 .

“You know, you’re angry because so many votes were stolen. It was taken away. And you say, ‘Well, we won’t [vote]”Said Trump.” We can’t do that. We have to do just the opposite. If you don’t vote, the socialists win and the communists win. The Georgia patriots must show up and vote for these two incredible people. “

Trump also fueled his ongoing battle with his former ally, Brian Kemp, Republican governor of Georgia, who has so far refused to take steps Trump is asking him to take to overthrow the referendum.

US President Donald Trump hosts a campaign event with US Republican Senators David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler at Valdosta Regional Airport in Valdosta, Georgia, United States on December 5, 2020.

Dustin Chambers | Reuters

“Your governor could very easily stop it if he knew what the hell he was doing,” Trump told the crowd in Valdosta. “Quit very easily.”

Since election day, Kemp has approved several handcounts in the state, all of which have confirmed Biden’s victory.

Categories
Politics

States Overpaid Unemployment Advantages and Need Cash Again

Unemployment payments that looked like a lifeline could now become their ruin for many.

Pandemic Unemployment Assistance, a federal program that covers gig workers, part-time workers, seasonal workers, and others who are not eligible for traditional unemployment benefits, has kept millions afloat. Established by Congress in March under the CARES bill, the program has provided over $ 70 billion in aid.

In implementing the hastily designed program, states overpaid hundreds of thousands of workers – often due to administrative errors. Now the states are demanding this money back.

The notices come out of the blue and contain instructions on how to repay thousands or even tens of thousands of dollars. Those who are billed and already living on the fringes are told that their benefits will be cut to make up for the errors – or that the state can even put a lien on their home, come after future wages, or withhold tax refunds.

Many who have collected payments are still unemployed and may have little chance of getting one. Most of them had no idea they were being overpaid.

“When someone receives a bill like this, it terrifies them,” said Michele Evermore, senior policy analyst for the National Employment Law Project, a not-for-profit labor rights group. Sometimes the letters themselves are flawed – citing overpayments when the benefits are properly paid – but either way, she said, the stress will “cost people’s lives”.

The hastily designed Pandemic Unemployment Assistance program has raised other issues, including widespread fraud programs and processing challenges. As a result, states only recently had sufficient resources to send out overpayment notifications. In the meantime, people have sometimes raised thousands of dollars and spent what they have understood to be legitimate benefits.

Olive Stewart, a 56-year-old immigrant from Jamaica, worked part-time as a sous-chef in a cafeteria at a Jewish school in Philadelphia, earning about $ 16 an hour for about 25 hours a week. But when the pandemic hit and schools closed, she was fired.

Ms. Stewart applied for pandemic unemployment benefits and was paid $ 234 per week. It wasn’t enough to cover the rent of $ 650, utility bill of $ 200, and internet bill of $ 200 for the house she shares with her 12-year-old daughter, retired mother, and sister who has a disability that prevents them from working. To make ends meet, Ms. Stewart began delving into her savings.

Then on October 6, she received a message that Pennsylvania unemployment insurance company Geographic Solutions had accidentally overpaid her. The overpayment included funds from the Pandemic Unemployment Assistance and a $ 600 grant to unemployment insurance. In total, she was told, she would have to repay nearly $ 8,000.

To collect the debt, the state began withholding more than half of her unemployment benefits, leaving her with only $ 105 a week. In early November, the state began to take all of her unemployment benefits so she had no income. She has not yet paid her December rent.

“The state should be careful about what they send out,” Ms. Stewart said. “It was her mistake, and I’ve already spent all the money on food and rent. How am I supposed to pay it back? “

Geographic Solutions made double payments for 30,000 claims in Pennsylvania because of a system problem, a $ 280 million error, the State Department of Labor and Industry said. (The company states the problem was due to a one-day error that was reported immediately.) Overpayments can also occur when a claimant makes a mistake on a form, as reported by ProPublica, or when a state determines that a recipient is shouldn’t be justified.

By September 30, approximately 27 percent of those eligible for Ohio Pandemic Unemployment Assistance had been overpaid, approximately 162,000 claims. In mid-November there were about 29,000 in Colorado; in Texas there were over 41,000.

Many states forego regular unemployment insurance overpayments if there is no fraud or if someone would have significant difficulty paying back the money. However, federal regulations on pandemic unemployment assistance prohibit forgiveness. Even if the status is incorrect, the recipient is on the hook.

States often automatically begin collecting the overpayment by withholding a portion – from 30 to 100 percent – of future unemployment benefit payments.

Many overpayments have arisen because state unemployment schemes are designed to calculate benefits using W-2 forms, employer records, pay slips, and other documents related to traditional jobs. With gig workers and part-time workers having different documentation, states had to quickly adapt to a new way of processing and approving claims.

Adoption errors are inevitable, said Behnaz Mansouri, senior attorney for the Unemployment Law Project, a nonprofit legal aid organization in Seattle.

Economy & Economy

Updated

Apr. 10, 2020, 4:09 pm ET

“For a new system to have such a punitive reaction when the system itself fails seems too harsh and draconian,” said Ms. Mansouri.

29-year-old Gina Jones was on leave in March from her part-time job at a breakfast bar at a Quality Inn in Spokane, Washington, and was paid $ 750 a week from the pandemic program, which allowed her to pay rent, food, and necessities for her two daughters Ages 1 and 5. She was called back to work in July and now works about 28 hours a week for $ 13.50 an hour.

Then in mid-November, she checked her unemployment portal online and saw a message that she had been overpaid by nearly $ 12,500. She fears that the state will garnish her wages to collect the debt.

“I’ve already used this money to support my family,” said Ms. Jones. “It’s all gone and I can’t afford to pay it back.”

Demanding unemployment benefits can undermine the aim of the unemployment system to stabilize the economy, said Philip Spesshardt, branch manager of benefit services for the Colorado Division of Unemployment Insurance.

When a person’s unemployment checks are reduced each week due to an overpayment, the recipient has less cash to pay bills and patronize local businesses. “Ultimately, this has a cascading effect on many of these small businesses, causing them to close permanently and further increase the unemployment rate,” said Spesshardt.

While overpayments cannot be waived under the federal program, applicants can apply for reimbursement after notification has been issued. However, the deadline for appeal can only be seven days. After that, the process can be slow, confusing, and cumbersome.

Colorado has taken steps to address the reimbursement difficulty. After discovering the large number of overpayments in October, the state found that the application form was confusing as it did not specify whether the person being submitted should be providing gross or net income. It was decided to write off cases where the recipients had submitted income and tax documents that could be used to calculate the correct benefit.

When asked how the policy was compatible with the federal ban on forgiveness, a Colorado Department of Labor and Employment spokeswoman cited “the administrative burden it would put on us to collect these overpayments on competing priorities.”

House Democrats have called for renewed pandemic aid to include a provision that will allow states to forego overpayments if workers cannot repay them without great difficulty. The provision would apply to past and future cases. A separate house bill with cross-party sponsorship provides for forgiveness if the overpayment is not the fault of the recipient and “such repayment would run counter to justice and a good conscience”.

But the possibility of a remedy is of no great comfort to those who are wondering how they are going to pay rent and put food on the table in the meantime.

William and Diana Villafana, 55 and 34, who operated a car rental company in Henderson, Nevada prior to the pandemic, learned in late October that they had been overpaid by more than $ 7,000 between them. To cover this debt, the state is taking full advantage of Mr. Villafana and giving Ms. Villafana $ 73 per week. They use credit cards for their $ 2,000 monthly rent as well as utilities, groceries, and other necessities.

“I don’t think they understand that unemployment benefits are vital,” said Villafana. “Or if they understand, they don’t care.”

Mr. Villafana is concerned about how he will continue to care for her son and daughter aged 6 and 7. When his daughter recently asked for a brush set and an easel, he didn’t know what to tell her.

“It’s pretty hard to tell them,” Look, you can’t “or” I can’t buy this for you, “he said,” I have no idea what we’re going to do with Christmas. “

Sheelagh McNeill contributed to the research.