Categories
Politics

Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani blasts investigators as federal probe heats up

Rudolph Giuliani, attorney for President Donald Trump, will hold a press conference on Thursday, November 19, 2020, in the Republican National Committee on lawsuits related to the 2020 presidential election result.

Tom Williams | CQ Appeal, Inc. | Getty Images

President Donald Trump’s personal attorney, Rudy Giuliani, protested against the prosecutors investigating him on Tuesday, proposing to act as a “secret police” and serve the political interests of President-elect Joe Biden.

Giuliani’s Twitter rant against the Justice Department came a day after NBC News reported that New York prosecutors are seeking permission from senior DOJ officials to request a search warrant from a judge for Giuliani’s electronic communications.

On the same day, judges at the US District Court in Manhattan officially appointed Audrey Strauss as the chief federal prosecutor’s office in the southern borough of New York, effective January 16.

Strauss, who oversees the Giuliani investigation, has been serving as acting U.S. attorney for the SDNY since last summer when her predecessor Geoffrey Berman was evicted.

Sources told NBC that the SDNY’s investigation into Giuliani was “very active”.

“I am proud to be number one on the Biden Vindictive government list,” Giuliani wrote in a tweet.

“Sounds like the anti-Trumpers of the DOJ can’t wait for Biden to make the DOJ the GOVERNMENT secret police, like they’re under Obama,” he added.

“You want to confiscate my e-mails. No reason. No wrongdoing. Attorney-client privilege.?”

A representative from Biden did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It is not known exactly why SDNY prosecutors are investigating Giuliani, who is currently leading Trump’s extremely far-reaching efforts to reverse the Biden Electoral College victory.

Giuliani, a former New York City mayor, was previously a US attorney for the SDNY and had also served as the DOJ’s chief officer.

Last year, the Wall Street Journal reported that SDNY prosecutors were reviewing Giuliani’s bank records in connection with an investigation into his business in Ukraine.

Two of Giuliani’s former employees, Lev Parnas and Igor Fruman, who were involved in its dealings in Ukraine, were arrested in October 2019 on charges of campaign funding fraud filed by the SDNY.

Giuliani, as Trump’s attorney, has been trying to gather harmful information about Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden in connection with Hunter Biden’s business activities in Ukraine for at least last year.

Giuliani’s efforts were widely viewed as an attempt to harm Biden’s then candidacy for president in early 2019.

But those efforts failed spectacularly in the summer of 2019 when Trump personally pressured the Ukrainian president to announce an investigation into the Bidens.

At the time, Trump withheld the military aid appropriated by Congress to Ukraine, which was embroiled in a dispute over the territory with its neighbor Russia.

Trump was charged by the House of Representatives for his actions. The Senate later acquitted him after a trial earlier this year.

Trump and his company are under investigation by the Manhattan Attorney’s Office, which is a government agency.

The DA office has an arrest warrant that allows him to obtain Trump’s tax records and other financial documents from his long-time accounting firm.

The President has asked the US Supreme Court to block this subpoena for the second time.

The Supreme Court ruled earlier this year that Trump did not have a full right as president to avoid his financial records from being subpoenaed by prosecutors.

Categories
Politics

Jon Ossoff Received Some Breaks in Politics. And He Made a Few of His Personal.

Jon Ossoff was 16 years old when he wrote a letter to John Lewis, the Georgia congressman and civil rights pioneer, that led to a spot as a volunteer in Mr. Lewis’s office.

When Mr. Ossoff was 19 and a rising sophomore at Georgetown, he went to work for Hank Johnson as the primary speechwriter and press aide for Mr. Johnson’s 2006 congressional campaign.

And Mr. Ossoff was 26 when, without any journalism experience other than an internship, he was made chief executive of a small documentary film company based in England.

Mr. Ossoff has always been adept at making his own breaks. He has consistently outperformed his professional résumé, impressing lawmakers many years his senior with his intellect and drive. And he has capitalized on his own well-off upbringing and a series of well-timed introductions and personal endorsements to rise through Democratic politics in Georgia.

Now 33, Mr. Ossoff is pursuing his most ambitious goal yet: to capture a seat in the United States Senate against an incumbent Republican, David Perdue, in a traditionally conservative state. If successful, he would become the youngest senator in 40 years.

Mr. Ossoff first emerged on the national stage in 2017, when his bid for a House seat in a special election provided Democrats the first opportunity to express resistance to President Trump. Though he lost a close race in a well-off district in suburban Atlanta, the energy surrounding his candidacy enabled him to shatter fund-raising records and build the political network that has put him within reach of the Senate.

That energy has hardly abated. Federal filings made public last week showed Mr. Ossoff to be the best-funded Senate candidate in history after pulling in $106.7 million from mid-October to mid-December — almost $40 million more than Mr. Perdue’s tally. The stunning totals reflect the stakes: If Mr. Ossoff and the Rev. Raphael Warnock win their runoff races on Jan. 5, Democrats will gain control of the Senate.

Still, Mr. Ossoff has little record to run on, or against. Other than campaigning for positions in Congress, he has spent the years since leaving Mr. Johnson’s office running Insight TWI, an investigative documentary company of eight staff members that has headquarters in London — doing so mostly from Atlanta.

He has mounted a campaign based less on his own experience and accomplishments and more on the idea that his election will help foster a political change in Georgia — the kind voters signaled they wanted when they backed Joseph R. Biden Jr. in the presidential election. He has also consistently cited Mr. Perdue’s financial dealings to label him “a crook” who cashed in on the pandemic, an allegation Mr. Perdue denies.

At campaign events, Mr. Perdue, 71, often fails to even mention Mr. Ossoff as an opponent. Instead, he and Kelly Loeffler, the other Republican Senate candidate, direct most of their attacks at Mr. Warnock, whom they view as a more substantive target. Mr. Perdue skipped a debate against Mr. Ossoff early this month, leaving the Democrat onstage by himself making his pitch to voters, but he has unleashed an onslaught of negative ads against Mr. Ossoff, portraying him as a hostage of the radical left.

None of this has dented Mr. Ossoff’s confidence. As he heads into the final days of the race, he has emphasized his connections to Mr. Lewis. And far from apologizing for his youth, he has cast himself as the inheritor of the legacy of young people who have taken leadership roles in progressive political organizations in the South.

“John Lewis was 23, 24 years old when he was leading the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee,” Mr. Ossoff said during an interview last week. “I was so inspired by the fact that young people in that movement had made a difference. And I don’t think that young people should simply wait their turn but should engage fully in the life of our communities, and our country, and our world, and try to make a difference.”

When Mr. Ossoff began his first campaign for Congress in 2017, he initially ran his campaign headquarters out of the basement of his parents’ Atlanta home. When he was in Washington, he stayed at a Capitol Hill townhouse owned by his father.

At the time, Mr. Ossoff described himself as a former “senior national security staffer,” which was something of an embellishment considering that he had been a midlevel committee staff member for Mr. Johnson.

The Republican case against him boiled down to his not living in the district he sought to represent and an assertion that he would be a pawn of Nancy Pelosi, then the House minority leader.

“Other than being born to rich parents, Jon Ossoff has never accomplished a single thing in his life,” said Corry Bliss, who ran a Republican super PAC that spent millions attacking Mr. Ossoff in the 2017 race.

But Mr. Ossoff received a critical endorsement from Mr. Lewis, and he proved to be an adept fund-raiser who quickly built connections with key constituencies. Progressives rallied to him as a way to express their outrage at the Trump administration. In the runoff, Mr. Ossoff got 48 percent of the vote, losing to Karen Handel.

In the 2020 Senate race, Mr. Ossoff is running as a mainstream Democrat, expressing sympathy for but not aligning himself with the party’s most liberal figures. He has stayed on message, hammering Mr. Perdue over his finances, and perhaps more important, he has not made any major mistakes on the campaign trail or in interviews.

There has been very little reliable public polling of the two Georgia Senate runoff elections, but few doubt that Mr. Ossoff is facing an uphill climb. Georgia has not sent a Democrat to the Senate since 2000 and hasn’t elected any Democrat to statewide office since 2006. And Republicans have traditionally had an advantage in Georgia runoffs because the Democratic electorate includes people who vote more infrequently.

In the last Georgia Senate runoff, three weeks after the November 2008 election, voter turnout sank to 2.1 million from 3.7 million.

Georgia Democrats say much of that calculus has changed in 2020, as Stacey Abrams, who narrowly lost the 2018 race for governor, has built a permanent progressive campaign infrastructure in the state. Already, more than two million Georgians have voted in the 2020 Senate runoffs.

“There is no more conventional wisdom, period,” said Jason Carter, a grandson of former President Jimmy Carter who was Georgia Democrats’ candidate for governor in 2014. “This election is different, this moment in history is different, and whatever anybody thinks they know, they don’t.”

The son of a publishing executive and a management consultant, Mr. Ossoff attended the prestigious Paideia School in Atlanta. In 2003, he read Mr. Lewis’s biography and talked his way into a volunteer position in the congressman’s office the next summer.

Michaeleen Crowell, who worked as Mr. Lewis’s legislative director and overlapped with Mr. Ossoff, said the congressman had received hundreds of letters from ambitious young people and that a parade of interns had come through his office. Mr. Ossoff, she said, made a special connection with the civil rights leader.

“You remind me of another time in my own life,” Mr. Lewis said to Mr. Ossoff in an Ossoff campaign video posted to Facebook in April, before Mr. Lewis’s death in July. “When I was 17 years old growing up in rural Alabama, I wrote a letter to Dr. King, and he wrote me back and sent me a round-trip Greyhound bus ticket and invited me to come to Montgomery and meet with him. And it changed my life.”

In the spring of 2006, Ms. Crowell helped arrange Mr. Ossoff’s transfer to work for the campaign of Hank Johnson, who was running a primary campaign against Representative Cynthia McKinney.

“He came to me asking if I could connect him,” she said of Mr. Ossoff. “I knew the folks who were running Hank’s campaign. So I said: ‘I know this young kid. He’s a go-getter.’”

Mr. Ossoff had just finished his freshman year at Georgetown University and had never worked on a campaign before. But in an initial three-hour meeting, he pitched Mr. Johnson, a local politician with a small law office, on using the internet to communicate with Democratic primary voters as well as donors, reporters and bloggers elsewhere.

“He wanted to use blogs and this new thing that I’d never heard of, Facebook, and so I gave him license to do that,” Mr. Johnson said. “It immediately put my campaign on the map. It got my campaign national attention.”

Mr. Ossoff quickly became one of Mr. Johnson’s most trusted aides. Mr. Johnson dispatched him to talk with Daraka Satcher, who would go on to become the congressman’s first chief of staff.

The two met at Bullfeathers, a venerable watering hole steps from the Capitol. Mr. Satcher said he had seen “this kid standing outside” who smiled and opened the door for him.

“I was offended, because he was clearly this kid, and I was like, ‘Do they really send a kid to vet me out?’” recalled Mr. Satcher, who then was in his early 30s.

Nonetheless, they sat down at a table for about an hour and a half and talked. “I’ll tell you, by the end of that lunch I was so impressed with him and his knowledge about policy and politics and his insight that it made me want to help the campaign even more,” he recounted. “I went from being offended to overly impressed,” Mr. Satcher said.

Mr. Johnson went on to beat Ms. McKinney and won accolades for his tech-savvy campaign. National Journal wrote that Mr. Johnson’s campaign had “the most unique blog strategy” and quoted Mr. Ossoff saying that blogs were “effective in reaching out to the people who make the news, the people who determine what’s hot and what’s not.”

When Mr. Johnson went to Washington the next January, Mr. Ossoff split time between his Georgetown studies and a job as a legislative correspondent in Mr. Johnson’s Capitol office, a highly unusual arrangement for an undergraduate.

Like many other young congressional staffers, most of Mr. Ossoff’s time was spent writing news releases and floor speeches that would be viewed only by the most die-hard of C-SPAN viewers. But in Mr. Johnson’s sixth month in office, Mr. Ossoff had achieved what would become his most concrete accomplishment: He proposed and wrote a House resolution that Mr. Johnson sponsored calling for peace talks to solve a conflict in northern Uganda.

“He was concerned about children being manipulated and used in an atrocious way,” Mr. Johnson said. “I knew nothing about the conflict before he brought it to my attention, and once he did, I thought it was a great idea.”

While he was at Georgetown, Mr. Ossoff sang in the campus a cappella group. Later he earned a pilot’s license in his off hours.

In 2003, Mr. Ossoff attended a small dinner party with his mother in southwestern France. At an outdoor table in a plum orchard, on a lovely summer evening, Mr. Ossoff was seated across the table from Ron McCullagh, a former BBC journalist who in 1991 had founded Insight News Television.

The company had produced award-winning documentaries such as “Cry Freetown,” about Sierra Leone’s civil war, and “Exodus,” which examined the efforts by thousands of Africans to make their way to Europe in search of better lives. Both films won Emmy Awards, among other prizes.

Mr. McCullagh and the teenage Jonathan Ossoff, as he called himself then, spoke for several hours, leading to a lasting friendship and a professional relationship.

“I was completely blown away by his brightness, by his intelligence and by his knowledge,” Mr. McCullagh recalled, adding how he had been struck by Mr. Ossoff’s “curiosity.”

“He told me about his thoughts on Chinese and American relationships, the importance of the China Sea” and the “strategic importance for the world of freedom of trade in that part of the world,” Mr. McCullagh recounted. “And the detail, knowledge he had of the situation was just very impressive. It was a very memorable dinner, and from that point on, we became friends.”

Mr. Ossoff ended up doing an internship at Insight News in July 2008. Five years later, Mr. McCullagh made a bold personnel move: He decided to hire Mr. Ossoff — then 26, with virtually no journalism experience — as chief executive of the organization and changed its name to Insight TWI — The World Investigates.

“It was a risk, but a calculated risk,” Mr. McCullagh said. “I wanted someone to take us forward. We needed some new thinking, and we got it.”

Mr. Ossoff invested $250,000 in Insight TWI months after he had joined, “to expand the business after Jon took over, when Jon came to Ron with some ideas,” according to a spokeswoman for Mr. Ossoff’s campaign. She said that Mr. Ossoff’s investment had not been related to his appointment as chief executive. Mr. McCullagh also invested the same amount at the time.

Mr. Ossoff’s campaign promotes him as an “investigative journalist,” though he does not act as an investigative reporter. As chief executive, he vets story ideas, helps prepare interview questions and attends to film production, editing and security arrangements for his staff. Mr. Ossoff also supervises the commissioning of documentaries with news media organizations like the BBC and Al Jazeera English.

According to his Senate campaign, Mr. Ossoff has been the executive producer of more than two dozen Insight TWI films on such subjects as soccer corruption in Ghana and child trafficking and sexual exploitation along the border of Bolivia and Argentina.

In Mr. Ossoff’s most recent personal financial report, filed in July, he valued Insight TWI at between $1 million and $5 million. According to records filed in November in Britain, he owns 75 percent or more of the organization’s shares.

Anas Aremeyaw Anas, a Ghanaian journalist who has worked with Insight TWI, said Mr. Ossoff had expanded the organization’s mission of having local reporters in Africa and other regions develop their own stories.

“The strategy was that we didn’t want parachute journalism,” Mr. Anas said. “Jon believed in having local journalists in places like Africa telling their stories and not having white men coming in.”

Diarmuid Jeffreys, manager of investigative programs for Al Jazeera English, called Mr. Ossoff a “tough negotiator” when it came to getting Insight TWI’s work commissioned.

“He doesn’t like to be pushed around,” Mr. Jeffreys said. “He will walk away if he doesn’t think a project is commercially viable or if he doesn’t think he can deliver it properly. He won’t just take any gig.”

Over the years, Insight TWI has prided itself on awards it has earned. Over a 14-year stretch beginning in 1999, according to its website, the company logged 47 awards or instances in which its documentaries were finalists, “shortlisted” or nominated for prizes. The awards include two Emmys, a Peabody and one British Academy of Film and Television Arts Award.

But there had been a drop-off in awards before Mr. Ossoff’s tenure at the helm, and in the eight years under his leadership, that has not changed; the company has received just two journalism prizes in that time.

“We have not prioritized applications for awards,” Mr. Ossoff said. “You can spend a lot of time applying for awards, and that time might be better spent developing journalism.”

Sheelagh McNeill, Susan Beachy and Kitty Bennett contributed research.

Categories
Politics

Trump indicators aid and funding invoice

U.S. President Donald Trump leaves the White House in Washington, DC on December 12, 2020.

Aandrew Caballero-Reynolds | AFP | Getty Images

President Donald Trump signed a massive coronavirus support and government funding package on Sunday days after he panicked Washington by suggesting he could veto the bill.

He declined to approve the legislation for days after receipt after exceeding a Saturday deadline to prevent an estimated 14 million people from temporarily losing unemployment insurance. The move extends the extended unemployment benefits into March, but millions of people are expected to lose a week in benefits due to the delay in Trump signing the bill.

The government would have closed Tuesday during a deadly pandemic if Trump hadn’t approved the legislation.

The president called the law a “shame” on Tuesday evening – after Congress approved it after talks with Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. Trump claimed he opposed the bill because it included $ 600 instead of $ 2,000 in direct payments to most Americans and because the $ 1.4 trillion portion of government spending included foreign aid. The President’s White House has taken these funds into its budget.

After Trump expressed support for larger checks, the Democrats adopted his stance. The democratically held house plans to vote on Monday on a measure to increase payments to $ 2,000.

In a statement on Sunday evening, Trump said the Senate would also “initiate the process for a vote that increases the checks to $ 2,000.” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell mentioned no plans to include the legislation if the House passes it in a separate statement hailing the bill. Most of the Kentucky Republican Caucus has opposed major direct payments.

The president also said he would send Congress a “formal resignation” requesting that what he calls “wasteful items” be removed from the bill. Legislators are not allowed to cancel the previously approved money as the legislation passed both houses of Congress with overwhelming support from both parties.

The White House had signaled for weeks that Trump would sign the pandemic relief bill passed by the divided Congress. His threat to defy the legislation shocked Capitol Hill and made Americans struggle to adjust their plans.

For example, the airlines had moved to bring back employees with $ 15 billion in wage support included on the bill.

Many economists and lawmakers have called the $ 900 billion coronavirus aid package inadequate. Still, it will send a dose of the help it needs as the virus overwhelms the health system and economy.

The measure provides for a weekly unemployment supplement of USD 300 per week until mid-March. It temporarily expands programs that allow freelancers and gig workers to get unemployment benefits and increases the number of weeks unemployed Americans can get help.

It sends $ 600 direct payments to most people and adds $ 600 for each child. The legislation provides for another round of small business support, the majority of which comes from $ 284 billion in Paycheck Protection Program loans.

Almost $ 30 billion will be spent distributing Covid-19 vaccines to ensure Americans can get free shots. The move also provides more than $ 20 billion in Covid-19 testing and contact tracing measures.

Together with the extension of the eviction moratorium, $ 25 billion will be spent on rental support. The airline’s payroll is part of a transportation relief of more than $ 45 billion.

The package also provides $ 82 billion for K-12 and higher education.

Democrats have announced that after President-elect Joe Biden takes office on Jan. 20, they will be quick to push for another relief bill that will be characterized by direct payments and state and local government aid. Your ability to pass a bill will depend in part on whether Republicans retain control of the Senate in two runoff elections on January 5th in Georgia.

This is the latest news. Please try again.

Categories
Politics

‘This simply has to get carried out’: Lawmakers push Trump to signal the reduction invoice.

“Sign the bill, do it, and if the president wants to push for more, let’s do it, too,” said Maryland Governor Larry Hogan, a Republican who also appeared on the show.

Another Washington governor, Jay Inslee, said Mr. Trump “has decided to take the entire aid package hostage”. Mr Inslee, a Democrat, announced Sunday that the state would provide $ 54 million to nearly 100,000 people who want to lose unemployment benefits.

Despite harsh criticism of Mr Trump, two elected progressive officials joined the president’s call for greater direct payments. In State of the Union, New York Democrat Jamaal Bowman claimed that after his defeat in November the president “is taking an attitude to make himself and bring himself back as a hero of the American people”. But like Mr. Trump he said, Americans needed more relief.

“It has to be at least $ 2,000, so he has to speak to his Republican friends and say, ‘Give the people the money,” said Cori Bush, Democrat of Missouri, who also called the $ 600 figure “a slap in the face.” “denoted people who suffer.”

Democrats, who have long been campaigning to increase financial relief spread across the country, plan to hold a vote on Monday to approve a standalone bill that will increase payments to $ 2,000. It’s unclear whether this legislation will stand a chance in the Senate, where Republicans have long been opposed to spending more than $ 1 trillion on pandemic aid.

Pennsylvania Republican Senator Patrick J. Toomey said he would oppose such a move and urged the president to sign the bill, adding that “time is running out”.

“I understand that he wants to be remembered for campaigning for big checks,” Toomey said on Fox News Sunday. “But the danger is that if he allows this to happen, he will be remembered for chaos, misery and erratic behavior.”

Categories
Politics

Trump pardons 15, together with folks convicted in Mueller probe

President Donald Trump on Tuesday apologized to 15 people, including two men convicted in the investigation by Special Envoy Robert Mueller and four former Blackwater US guards convicted of the 2007 murders of 14 unarmed Iraqi civilians in Baghdad.

Others who received pardons included two former Republican congressmen who admitted to having committed financial crimes.

Trump also commuted all or some of the criminal convictions of five other people as the president is nearing his final month in office.

One such person, Philip Esformes, owner of a health facility in South Florida, was sentenced to 20 years in prison in September 2019 for “the largest healthcare fraud ever indicted by the Justice Department”. Esformes, 52, is now being released from prison for Trump’s action.

Trump, who has sharply criticized Muller’s investigation into his 2016 campaign and its contacts with Russians, apologized to his former campaign foreign policy advisor, George Papadopoulos, who was convicted of making false statements during the investigation.

George Papadopoulos, former member of the foreign affairs committee of Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign, poses for a picture before a television interview in New York, New York, the United States, on March 26, 2019.

Carlo Allegri | Reuters

“Today’s apology helps correct the injustice that Mueller’s team has done to so many people,” Trump’s press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in a statement to Papadopoulous.

The president also pardoned Alex van der Zwaan, an attorney and Dutch national who pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI during the Mueller investigation. Van der Zwaan was the first person convicted in the investigation and was sentenced to 30 days in prison in 2018.

Alex van der Zwaan leaves the U.S. District Court after his conviction in Washington on April 3, 2018.

Leah Millis | Reuters

Four former Blackwater security companies, Nicholas Slatten, Paul Slough, Evan Liberty and Dustin Heard, who received pardons, opened fire on and around Nisur Square in Baghdad on September 16, 2007. According to the Justice Department, 14 civilians were killed, including two women and two boys, ages 11 and 9. At least 17 other victims were injured.

Slatten, who was convicted of murder, was released “without provocation,” according to the Justice Department. He has served a life sentence.

The other three men were convicted of manslaughter and other charges and were sentenced to 15 years in prison again last year, half of their original sentences.

In a statement, McEnany said that “the pardon for these four veterans has broad support from the public, including Pete Hegseth, a Fox News employee and a number of GOP Congressmen.

“In addition, prosecutors recently announced – more than 10 years after the incident – that the leading Iraqi investigator was heavily relied on by prosecutors to verify that there were no insurgent victims and to gather evidence , possibly had ties to insurgent groups herself, “McEnany said in her statement.

Other pardons include former California Congressman Duncan Hunter and New Yorker Chris Collins.

Former U.S. Representative Chris Collins (R-NY) is leaving federal court in New York City on October 1, 2019.

Drew Angerer | Getty Images

Collins, who last year pleaded guilty to crimes related to his son pointing to nonpublic information about a pharmaceutical company’s failed drug trial, was the first member of Congress to endorse Trump’s campaign as president in 2015. He served a 26-month sentence in October.

Hunter pleaded guilty to misusing campaign funds in 2019 along with his wife, who together converted and stole more than $ 250,000 over several years. He was due to serve an 11 month sentence next month.

Another fallen GOP member of Congress, Steve Stockman of Texas, had the remainder of his 10-year prison sentence for misusing donations that were converted by the President. Stockman, 64, had served more than two years in that tenure and signed Covid-19 that year.

Senator Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., Condemned many of the pardons in a damning statement.

“I doubt government contractors who slaughtered civilians or slaughtered corrupt friends of Congress had the founders in mind when drafting the pardon,” said Blumenthal, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

“Most despicable is that President Trump is twisting that presidential power to reward allies who have broken the law about his conduct,” he said. “Donald Trump is leaving the presidency as he accepted it: without a hint of respect for the constitution and as a complete shame for his office.”

Trump also pardoned two former U.S. border guards, Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, for their convictions for shooting and wounding an unarmed illegal alien who traded 700 pounds of marijuana in 2005. President George W. Bush had their sentences converted from 11 and 11 years to 12 years in 2009.

The pardons come after Trump refused to admit he lost the presidential election to Joe Biden, whose victory was confirmed by the electoral college last week. Trump’s loss sparked immediate speculation that he would reward allies and others with executive grace actions in his final weeks at the White House.

Trump has been particularly stingy when it comes to granting executive grace, which includes pardons and commutations, compared to previous presidents.

As of Tuesday, Trump had issued just 28 pardons and commuted the criminal convictions of 16 other people, a significantly lower rate than other one-year presidents, according to the Justice Department.

Trump’s pardons included those on financial scammer Michael Milken; Press Baron Conrad Black; former Arizona Sheriff Joe Arapaio, convicted of contempt of court; Lewis “Scooter” Libby, former advisor to ex-Vice President Dick Cheney on obstruction of justice; Conservative Gadfly Dinesh D’Souza for Campaign Submission Fraud; and Ex-New York Police Commissioner Bernie Kerik for Tax and Other Crimes.

In November, Trump apologized to his first national security adviser, Michael Flynn, for making false statements to FBI agents.

In July, Trump commuted the 40-month sentence of Republican adviser Roger Stone, who was convicted of lying to Congress.

Among the beneficiaries of his commutation was former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich, who tried to sell an appointment to the Senate seat vacated by Barack Obama when that president became president.

Trump previously apologized for several deaths, including early 20th century black boxing champion Jack Johnson for the crime of crossing the state line with his white girlfriend and Susan B. Anthony, the 19th suffragette, who was charged with illegal elections was convicted.

Trump also pardoned the late scientist Zay Jeffries, who was convicted of anticompetitive behavior by Sherman in 1948 for violating the antitrust law. That year, President Harry Truman awarded him the President’s Medal of Merit for his work during World War II, which included contributions to the Manhattan Project.

Trump pardoned Alice Marie Johnson, a woman convicted of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in August. The president had commuted Johnson’s life sentence two years earlier after lobbying reality TV star Kim Kardashian West on her behalf.

The only other president with a term in office in the past 30 years, Trump’s Republican compatriot George HW Bush, pardoned 74 people by comparison and issued commutations for three more.

Obama, who served two terms before Trump, pardoned 212 people, or more than six times the number Trump pardoned in half that time. Obama commuted the sentences of more than 1,700 people.

The last Republican to serve two terms, George W. Bush, pardoned 189 people and commuted 11 sentences.

Categories
Politics

Trump’s Fraud Claims Died in Court docket, however the Fable of Stolen Elections Lives On

Die unbegründeten und verzweifelten Behauptungen von Präsident Trump über eine gestohlene Wahl in den letzten sieben Wochen – die aggressivste Förderung des „Wahlbetrugs“ in der amerikanischen Geschichte – konnten vor Gericht in sieben Bundesstaaten keine Wirkung entfalten oder den erlittenen Verlust annähernd rückgängig machen an Joseph R. Biden Jr.

Aber die Bemühungen haben zu mindestens einem unerwarteten und völlig anderen Ergebnis geführt: Eine gründliche Entlarvung der Art von Wahlbetrug behauptet, die Republikaner hätten verwendet, um das Stimmrecht für den größten Teil des jungen Jahrhunderts zurückzudrängen.

Herr Trump und seine Verbündeten haben eine Reihe von Tropen und Canards ausprobiert, die den Republikanern ähnlich sind, um Gesetze zu rechtfertigen, die in vielen Fällen die Abstimmung für Schwarze und Hispanics überproportional erschwerten , die Demokraten weitgehend unterstützen.

Ihre Behauptungen, dass Tausende von Menschen durch die Annahme anderer Identitäten in Wahllokalen „doppelt gewählt“ hätten, stimmten mit denen überein, die zuvor als Grund für die Einführung strenger neuer Gesetze zur Identifizierung von Wählern angeführt wurden.

Ihre Behauptung, dass eine große Anzahl von Nicht-Bürgern illegale Stimmen für Herrn Biden abgegeben habe, stimmte mit den Behauptungen überein, die Republikaner erhoben haben, um für strenge neue Anforderungen an den „Nachweis der Staatsbürgerschaft“ für die Wählerregistrierung einzutreten.

Und ihre Geschichten über eine große Anzahl von Betrügern, die im Namen von „toten Wählern“ Stimmzettel abgeben, ähnelten denen, mit denen mehrere Staaten aggressive „Säuberungen“ von Abstimmungslisten durchgeführt haben, bei denen Zehntausende von Registrierungen fälschlicherweise zur Kündigung vorgesehen waren.

Nachdem Herr Trump und seine Verbündeten rund 60 Klagen eingereicht und sogar einen finanziellen Anreiz für Informationen über Betrug geboten hatten, konnten sie keinen Fall einer illegalen Abstimmung im Namen ihres Gegners endgültig nachweisen vor Gericht – kein einziger Fall eines undokumentierten Einwanderers, der einen Stimmzettel abgibt, keine doppelte Abstimmung der Bürger oder glaubwürdige Beweise dafür, dass Legionen der stimmberechtigten Toten Herrn Biden einen Sieg bescherten, der nicht ihm gehörte.

“Es sollte wirklich einen Todesstoß in diese Erzählung bringen, die sich mit Behauptungen über Wahlbetrug befasst, die einfach nie begründet wurden”, sagte Kristen Clarke, die Präsidentin des Nationalen Anwaltsausschusses für Bürgerrechte, einer gemeinnützigen Rechtsgruppe und ein ehemaliger Anwalt des Justizministeriums, dessen Arbeit Abstimmungsfälle umfasste. “Sie haben sich selbst vor Gericht gestellt und sind gescheitert.”

Es gibt jedoch keine Anzeichen dafür, dass diese Niederlagen vor Gericht den Verlauf der laufenden Bemühungen zur Einschränkung der Stimmabgabe ändern werden, die seit den umstrittenen Wahlen von 2000 für die konservative Politik von zentraler Bedeutung sind. Dies fiel mit der zunehmenden Besorgnis der Partei zusammen, dass der demografische Wandel die Demokraten in der Bevölkerung begünstigen würde Abstimmung.

Die falschen Vorstellungen haben in Mr. Trumps Twitter- und Facebook-Feeds weitergelebt. im Fernsehprogramm von Fox News, Newsmax und One America News Network; und in Anhörungen im Staatshaus, in denen republikanische Führer auf der Grundlage der zurückgewiesenen Anschuldigungen über restriktivere Wahlgesetze nachgedacht haben.

In Georgien haben republikanische Gesetzgeber bereits die Verschärfung der staatlichen Regeln für die Briefwahl und die Identifizierung der Wähler erörtert. In Pennsylvania erwägen republikanische Gesetzgeber, Schritte rückgängig zu machen, die die Abstimmung in Abwesenheit erleichtert hatten, und ihre Kollegen in Wisconsin erwägen ebenfalls strengere Beschränkungen für die Briefwahl sowie für die vorzeitige Abstimmung.

Wenn überhaupt, hat Präsident Trump der Bewegung, den Zugang zu Stimmzetteln zu beschränken, neue Impulse gegeben und ist gleichzeitig der einzigartige, charismatische Führer geworden, den er nie hatte.

Nachdem er geradezu erklärt hatte, dass ein hohes Wahlniveau schlecht für die Republikaner sei, überzeugte er seine Basis davon, dass das Wahlsystem von Betrug verfault ist, und betrachtete diese Fiktion als ein Grundprinzip der Partei. Mehrere kürzlich durchgeführte Umfragen haben gezeigt, dass die Mehrheit der Republikaner die Wahlen für betrügerisch hält, obwohl Wahlbeamte im ganzen Land berichten, dass sie überraschend verlaufen sind Selbst bei einer Pandemie reibungslos, mit außergewöhnlich hoher Wahlbeteiligung und ohne Anzeichen von Betrug, abgesehen von dem üblichen Zertrümmern von schlechten Schauspielern oder Fehlern von gut gemeinten Wählern.

In den letzten anderthalb Monaten der Gerichtsurteile wurden Wahlbetrugsvorwürfe immer wieder als unzureichend oder glaubwürdig zurückgewiesen, häufig von von Republikanern ernannten Richtern.

Herr Trump und seine Verbündeten haben argumentiert, dass die 59 Verluste, die sie in 60 seit dem Wahltag eingereichten Klagen erlitten haben, auf Verfahrensentscheidungen beruhten, und sich darüber beschwert, dass die Richter sich geweigert haben, die Einzelheiten der Vorwürfe zu prüfen, mit denen sie versucht haben, eine Wahl zu stürzen. Herr Biden gewann mit 7 Millionen Stimmen (und mit 74 im Wahlkollegium).

Laut einer Analyse der New York Times haben sie jedoch in mehr als zwei Dritteln ihrer Fälle nicht einmal offiziell Betrug behauptet und stattdessen argumentiert, dass lokale Beamte von den Wahlkodizes abgewichen seien, die Wahlen nicht ordnungsgemäß verwaltet hätten oder dass die am Wahltag geltenden Regeln nicht eingehalten worden seien waren selbst illegal.

In dem Einzelfall, in dem Herr Trump gewann, forderte seine Kampagne eine staatlich angeordnete Fristverlängerung in Pennsylvania für die Vorlage eines Personalausweises für per Post versandte Stimmzettel heraus, was sich auf eine geringe Anzahl von Stimmen auswirkte.

In fast einem Dutzend Fällen hatten ihre Betrugsvorwürfe tatsächlich ihre Tage vor Gericht und brachen unter Kontrolle immer wieder zusammen.

Trotz des endgültigen Charakters dieser Entscheidungen bestand die Antwort der Republikaner darin, an den Betrugsfiktionen des Präsidenten festzuhalten.

Die Republikaner im Kongress haben sie ebenfalls befördert, da Herr Trump Senatoren und Mitglieder des Repräsentantenhauses dazu drängt, die Ergebnisse des Wahlkollegiums bei einer angeblichen Verfahrensabstimmung abzulehnen, um Herrn Bidens klaren Sieg über den Präsidenten am 6. Januar zu bestätigen.

In einer Anhörung des Senats am 16. Dezember beispielsweise wiederholte Senator James Lankford aus Oklahoma eine Reihe von Behauptungen der Trump-Kampagne wegen illegaler Wahlen in Nevada.

“42.000 Menschen in Nevada haben Ihrer Arbeit zufolge mehr als einmal gewählt”, sagte Lankford während der Befragung eines Anwalts der Trump-Kampagne, Jesse Binnall. Herr Lankford wiederholte die Behauptungen der Trump-Kampagne, dass Tote, Einwohner außerhalb des Bundesstaates und Nicht-Staatsbürger in Nevada in beträchtlicher Zahl illegale Stimmzettel abgegeben hätten. Die Kampagne hatte diese Anschuldigungen auf Analysen gestützt, die Abstimmungslisten mit Aufzeichnungen aus kommerziellen und staatlichen Quellen abgleichen.

Der Prozessrichter im Fall Nevada hatte die Klage jedoch fast zwei Wochen zuvor abgewiesen und diese Analysen als nicht stichhaltig und nicht überzeugend zurückgewiesen. Er erklärte, die Kampagne habe „unter keinem Beweisstandard bewiesen, dass illegale Stimmen abgegeben und gezählt wurden“.

Solch ein sogenannter “Listenabgleich”, auf den sich Staaten verlassen, um ihre Liste ungültiger Wähler zu reduzieren, erfordert sorgfältige Arbeit von langjährigen Experten. Es ist leicht schlecht zu machen. Es waren schlecht konzipierte oder schlecht durchgeführte Datenanalysen, die Georgia und Texas kürzlich dazu veranlassten, Zehntausende gültiger Registrierungen zu Unrecht zu eliminieren und den Kurs erst umzukehren, nachdem Stimmrechtsgruppen und andere auf die Fehler aufmerksam gemacht hatten.

Konservative haben solche Datenanalysen auch verwendet, um im Laufe der Jahre wilde Behauptungen über Wahlbetrug aufzustellen, und sind häufig vor Gericht auf Stolpersteine ​​gestoßen, da sich herausstellte, dass sie stark fehlerhaft oder falsch waren.

Dieses Muster hielt auch in der diesjährigen Flut von Pro-Trump-Klagen an.

Zum Beispiel haben die Republikaner bei der Verbreitung ihrer Fälle im ganzen Land auf Datenanalysen eines Cybersecurity-Managers und eines einmaligen texanischen Kongresskandidaten namens Russell J. Ramsland Jr. verwiesen. In einem seiner Berichte wurde behauptet, dass verschiedene Bezirke in Michigan Stimmenzahlen hatten, die über ihrer Bevölkerung lagen , was bedeutet, dass ihre Gesamtzahl mit illegalen Stimmzetteln aufgefüllt wurde; Es stellte sich heraus, dass sich die fraglichen Grafschaften in Minnesota befanden, nicht in Michigan.

Ebenso wurden mehrere spezifische Anschuldigungen, dass Menschen illegal Stimmzettel im Namen von Toten abgegeben haben, aus einer amateurhaften Datenanalyse geboren, die sich später als fehlerhaft erwies.

In einem Bundesfall, den die Trump-Kampagne mit sich brachte, um die Zertifizierung der Ergebnisse in Michigan zu verzögern, war die spezifische Erwähnung eines von einem toten Wähler abgegebenen Stimmzettels falsch: Durch die Registrierung des Toten wurde keine Stimme abgegeben. Vielmehr stimmte ein Mann mit genau demselben Namen legal ab. (Mr. Trumps Team zog diesen Fall aus der Akte, als Michigan sich der Zertifizierung näherte.)

Dies ist ein häufiges Problem bei Behauptungen über „tote Wähler“, „Doppelwähler“ und „nichtstaatliche“ Wähler. Blinde Vergleiche offizieller Daten führen häufig dazu, dass „falsch positive Ergebnisse“ zwei Personen mit demselben Namen wie dieselbe Person behandeln.

In Georgien versuchen Anwälte des Außenministers, dass das Gericht eine „Experten“ -Analyse ablehnt, in der festgestellt wird, dass das Gewinnergebnis von Herrn Biden mehr als 10.000 Stimmzettel von toten Bürgern enthielt. Der staatliche Experte in diesem Fall, der MIT-Politikwissenschaftler Charles Stewart III, kam zu dem Schluss, dass die Trump-Kampagne nur “die unauffällige Tatsache zu identifizieren schien, dass einige Georgier, die gewählt haben, den Namen und das Geburtsjahr einer anderen Person teilen, die gestorben ist” Staatsanwälte sagen es. In mehreren anderen Fällen erwiesen sich die „toten Wähler“, in deren Namen die Trump-Kampagne sagte, dass Stimmzettel abgegeben wurden, als sehr lebendig.

In der vergangenen Woche haben die Behörden in Pennsylvania eine Festnahme aufgrund einer Anschuldigung vorgenommen, die die Trump-Kampagne erstmals im November erhoben hatte. Die Staatsanwaltschaft von Delaware County sagte, ein Mann namens Bruce Bartman habe im Namen seiner verstorbenen Mutter eine Briefwahl abgegeben – für Mr. Trump. Der Anwalt von Herrn Bartman sagte, Herr Bartman habe dies als fehlgeleitete „Form des Protests“ getan, und der örtliche Staatsanwalt sagte, es sei nichts weiter als „ein Beweis dafür, dass eine Person Wahlbetrug begangen hat“.

Herr Trump und seine Verbündeten haben auch Wahlbeamte selbst angegriffen. In einer neuen Variante der Mythologie des Wahlbetrugs haben sie behauptet, die Beamten hätten sich entweder an fantastischen Betrugsprogrammen beteiligt oder seien bereit, daran teilzunehmen. In mehreren Staaten wurden solche Anschuldigungen von Richtern kurzerhand zurückgewiesen.

In Arizona reichten die Republikaner eine Bundesklage ein, in der sie behaupteten, sowohl Wahlhelfer als auch demokratische Beamte, die die Wahlen überwachen, hätten eine beliebige Anzahl betrügerischer Aktivitäten “aufrechterhalten” können. Die Richterin Diane J. Humetewa, eine vom ehemaligen Präsidenten Barack Obama ernannte Richterin, wies die Klage ab und sagte, dass „diese Anspielungen die Standards für Betrugsvorwürfe nicht erfüllen“.

In Michigan wurde Richter Timothy M. Kenny, ein Staatsrichter, gebeten, die Behauptung zu prüfen, dass Wahlbeamte Menschen zur Stimmabgabe „gecoacht“ hätten – eine Behauptung, die laut Richter bei der Entlassung ohne einen Ort, ein Datum oder eine andere relevante Aussage aufgestellt wurde Einzelheiten.

Nur wenige Betrugsvorwürfe aus der Trump-Ära haben sich in konservativen Medien so gut durchgesetzt wie solche, die computergestützte Abstimmungssysteme beinhalten, die angeblich Trump-Stimmen auf Biden-Stimmen „umstellen“.

Eine der wildesten dieser Behauptungen war die Anschuldigung, dass Beamte in mindestens vier Bundesstaaten von Dominion Voting Systems erstellte Stimmzettel verwendet haben, um Hunderttausende, wenn nicht Millionen Stimmen von Herrn Trump an Herrn Biden abzugeben.

Diese unwahrscheinliche Verschwörung wurde in vier Klagen von Sidney Powell, einem ehemaligen Anwalt für die Trump-Kampagne, am ausführlichsten ausgestrahlt.

Ihre persönliche Bilanz ähnelt der aller anderen gescheiterten republikanischen Wahlbetrugsklagen. Trotz der Widerlegung durch Richter und Wahlbeamte im ganzen Land wurde ihre Erzählung in den rechten Medien immer wieder wiederholt, um sicherzustellen, dass der Begriff des umfassenden Betrugs ungehindert an Bedeutung gewinnt.

Ein Richter in Phoenix nannte Frau Powells Beschwerde “ohne plausible Anschuldigungen”. Eine Richterin in Michigan schrieb, dass Frau Powells Überzeugung, dass Wahlmaschinen das Wahlergebnis veränderten, „eine Verschmelzung von Theorien, Vermutungen und Spekulationen“ sei.

Die gründlichste Entlarvung von Frau Powells Verschwörungen erfolgte letzte Woche in einem blasigen Brief von Dominion, in dem die Integrität seiner Maschinen bestätigt wurde, der in unabhängigen Audits überprüft wurde. Das Unternehmen forderte sie auf, ihre Aussagen zurückzuziehen, und beschuldigte sie, sich auf eine „rücksichtslose Desinformationskampagne“ einzulassen.

Dominion gab an, dass es auch rechtliche Schritte gegen Rudolph W. Giuliani, der die rechtlichen Bemühungen von Herrn Trump nach der Wahl angeführt hat, und mehrere prominente konservative Medienvertreter überlegte.

Während sie ihren Betrugsmythos auf nationaler Ebene weiter vorantreibt, hat Frau Powell ihre Argumente vor den Obersten Gerichtshof gebracht und dabei engen Kontakt zu Herrn Trump gehalten, der sich persönlich im Weißen Haus getroffen hat.

Die Stadt Detroit beantragt Sanktionen gegen Frau Powell, und die Generalstaatsanwältin von Michigan, Dana Nessel, sagt, sie erwäge dies auch wegen „absichtlicher Falschdarstellungen“ in den rechtlichen Unterlagen von Frau Powell.

Trotz alledem lebt die Handlung weiter, sogar an Heiligabend, als sich Herr Trump die Zeit nahm, auf Twitter zu schreiben: „VOTER BETRUG IST KEINE VERSPRECHUNGSTHEORIE.“

Categories
Politics

Pete Buttigieg donors scored contracts from South Bend when he was mayor

Former South Bend, Indiana Mayor Pete Buttigieg, U.S. President-elect Joe Biden’s candidate for Secretary of Transportation, reacts to his nomination as Biden looks on during a press conference on December 16, 2020 at Biden’s interim headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware, USA .

Kevin Lemarque | Reuters

Pete Buttigieg, Joe Biden’s election as Secretary of Transportation and former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, received presidential campaign donations from executives of companies that had public works contracts with the city while he was running it.

A CNBC review of dozens of the city’s infrastructure contracts during his second term as mayor from 2016-2020 shows that under Buttigieg, some of the city’s spending went to contractors who would later become donors to his presidential campaign, which he launched in 2019.

If approved by the US Senate, Buttigieg, as head of the Department of Transportation, would be responsible for driving the incoming administration’s infrastructure proposals forward.

Buttigieg is 38 years old and is considered a rising star in the National Democratic Party. His role as transport secretary could strengthen him if he aspires to a higher office again.

Several of the contractors produced new roads, bridges and buildings for the city. South Bend’s latest budget is over $ 350 million. The Department of Transportation will start the new year with a budget of over $ 80 billion. Buttigieg proposed a $ 1 trillion infrastructure plan when he ran for president.

Data from the bipartisan Center for Responsive Politics shows Buttigieg raised nearly $ 100 million during his presidential campaign. About $ 2 million came from real estate donors.

A report from the Center for Public Integrity and progressive media company The Young Turks shows that Buttigieg received similar contributions from city entrepreneurs when he first ran for mayor in 2011. In this case, potential contractors gave something to his political organization, and they then received funding agreements from the city after submitting competitive bids. These offers were then approved by the Public Works Authority.

The Buttigieg team answers

After CNBC finalized most of the contracts and resulting contributions to the Biden transition team, a Buttigieg spokesperson sent CNBC a detailed response. The representative declined to be included in this story.

The spokesman said Buttigieg was not involved in the projects while noting that the companies did business with the city before Buttigieg became mayor. The spokesman also said leaders have run other Democratic presidential campaigns in the past, including Bidens, Hillary Clintons and Barack Obamas. Some also gave up to Republicans.

“Pete avoided delving into who got those contracts for that very reason. And I’d also like to point out that on Pete’s first day as mayor, he put in place a code of ethics and signed a responsible bidder regulation in 2018 to ensure that taxpayers’ dollars are preserved efficiently spent by responsible contractors, “said the Buttigieg spokesman.

The spokesman noted that Buttigieg signed an executive order in 2012 that stipulated that any government employee, including himself, would not knowingly solicit or receive gifts or favors from any person who has a business relationship or seeks business from a city authority.

“You link to contracts that have been approved by the Board of Public Works, which meets in public, does its business in public and approves those contracts through an open and transparent procurement process that goes through a bidding process, and as I said earlier – has little involvement from the mayor, “said the representative.

CNBC provided the City of South Bend with details of most of the contracts approved by the Board of Public Works and the executives who later contributed to Buttigieg’s presidential campaign. A spokesman defended the company.

“Each of these firms is highly regarded and has a local reputation for providing quality services to the city and residents of South Bend,” Mayor’s press secretary Caleb Bauer told CNBC. “Each of these contracts also went through a professional procurement process, which is public and transparent, before being approved by the public works agency, which is governed by state law.”

Still, some Democrats expect Republicans to make a big deal out of the contributions Buttigieg has received from contractors.

“He’s been charged with conflicts of interest, and if the Republicans hold the Senate, he’s going to go through a very, very tough ratification process,” said veteran Democratic strategist Hank Sheinkopf.

Companies and contracts

In 2017, construction company Walsh & Kelly signed a $ 600,000 contract with South Bend for a future Courtyard Marriott hotel. Two years later, the company received contracts valued at just over $ 2.4 million from South Bend. The hotel opened in 2018.

Walsh & Kelly President Kevin Kelly contributed $ 2,700 to Buttigieg’s presidential campaign, according to CRP data. This is almost the maximum contribution a person can legally make to a campaign.

Walsh & Kelly did not return comments-seeking calls.

Arne Sorenson, CEO of Marriott, gave Buttigieg’s campaign the maximum amount of $ 2,800, records show.

A Marriott spokeswoman defended Sorenson’s donation to Buttigieg’s political organization.

“Arne Sorenson personally supported Pete Buttigieg’s presidential campaign because his wife and children were inspired by his campaign,” Elynsey Price, a spokesman for the hotel chain, told CNBC. “Whatever was going on near or in relation to the South Bend hotels would have been the responsibility of our franchisees or owners, not Marriott.”

South Bend real estate development firm JSK Hospitality closed one of its largest deals in 2018 when a subsidiary of the company bought the former College Football Hall of Fame building in town for over $ 525,000, according to the South Bend Tribune. The CEO, AJ Patel, gave $ 1,000 to the Buttigieg campaign. The Courtyard Marriott is part of the company’s hotel portfolio.

CNBC was unable to leave a message on JSK Hospitality’s general voicemail box on Tuesday because the voicemail was full. The same was true of Patel’s line. Instead, CNBC left a message for the company’s CFO, who didn’t respond to a request for comment.

In 2017, the city reached an agreement with Epoch Architecture to build a new fire station in South Bend. The company agreed to make payments from the city of over $ 280,000 for the project. The director of the engineering and architecture firm, Kyle Copelin, later gave $ 500 to the Buttigieg campaign, records show.

Copelin did not respond to a request for comment.

In 2017, the city signed at least three contracts with Jones Petrie Rafinski, an architecture and engineering firm with offices in South Bend. The company had over $ 200,000 worth of business with the city that year. Two years later, the company’s vice president David Rafinski donated $ 500 to Buttigieg’s presidential campaign. His company also had other contracts with South Bend in 2019.

Rafinski told CNBC that he has no interaction with Buttigieg’s executive team while his company works for South Bend.

“We have been a customer of South Bend since Pete was in high school,” said Rafinski. “The work we do is done through the Board of Public Works. We had no interaction with Pete at all with our work. It was all through the Board of Public Works.” Rafinski said he supported Buttigieg’s presidential campaign because he believed the former mayor’s “compassion” was needed in national politics.

South Bend also signed a consultancy agreement with the Canadian company Stantec in 2017. The order was valued at over $ 105,000. The agreement with the design and engineering firm appeared to go through the nearby Chicago offices. Later, Michael Toolis, who is a Stantec vice president according to LinkedIn, gave $ 2,000 to Buttigieg’s presidential campaign. Toolis was once employed by VOA Associates, a Midwestern design firm that previously worked at the University of Notre Dame. VOA was taken over by Stantec in 2016.

“The company does not allow political contributions to candidates on its behalf,” Stantec spokeswoman Laura Leopold replied in a one-line email to questions from CNBC.

American Structurepoint, an engineering firm headquartered in Indianapolis, won at least seven $ 300,000 contracts in 2018 for consulting and other services for South Bend. Greg Henneke, the senior executive vice president, gave Buttigieg’s presidential campaign $ 2,700 a year later.

Both Stantec and American Structurepoint had contracts with the city in 2019.

An American Structurepoint spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.

Categories
Politics

Jobless Advantages Are Set to Expire as Trump Resists Signing Aid Invoice

Hicham Oumlil, a freelance fashion designer based in Brooklyn, said he and his wife, an interior designer on vacation, will both lose nearly $ 600 a week leaving the couple and their 7-year-old son with no source of income. After paying less than half of his monthly rent for the past three months, Mr Oumlil, 48, feared he would get deeper into debt if the Aid Act did not become law.

The second stimulus

Answers to your questions about the stimulus calculation

Updated December 23, 2020

Legislators agreed to a plan to provide $ 600 stimulus payments and distribute $ 300 federal unemployment benefits for 11 weeks. Here you can find out more about the bill and what’s in it for you.

    • Do I get another incentive payment? Individual adults with adjusted gross income on their 2019 tax returns of up to $ 75,000 per year would receive a payment of $ 600, and heads of household up to $ 112,500 and a couple (or someone whose spouse died in 2020) would receive up to to earn $ 150,000 per year Get double the amount. If they have dependent children, they will also receive $ 600 for each child. People with incomes just above this level would receive a partial payment that decreases by $ 5 for every $ 100 of income.
    • When could my payment arrive? Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin told CNBC that he expected the first payments to be made before the end of the year. However, it will take a while for everyone to receive their money.
    • Does the agreement concern unemployment insurance? Legislators agreed to extend the length of time people can receive unemployment benefits and restart an additional federal benefit that is on top of the usual state benefits. But instead of $ 600 a week it would be $ 300. That would take until March 14th.
    • I am behind on my rent or expect to be soon. Do I get relief? The deal would provide $ 25 billion to be distributed through state and local governments to help backward tenants. In order to receive support, households would have to meet various conditions: the household income (for 2020) must not exceed 80 percent of the regional median income; At least one household member must be at risk of homelessness or residential instability. and individuals must be eligible for unemployment benefits or face direct or indirect financial difficulties due to the pandemic. The agreement states that priority will be given to support for lower-income families who have been unemployed for three months or more.

“Our livelihoods are shaken,” he said. “The government shows no leadership. I am impressed with what is currently going on in Congress. “

After House Republicans blocked Democratic efforts to unilaterally increase direct payments from $ 600 to $ 2,000 per adult, top Democrats are planning a roll-call vote on the Monday, when the entire House of Representatives is present Measure to hold. Legislators could also potentially approve an emergency funding bill to keep the government going.

“As the economy continues to stall, people are hanging by a thread and desperately need government relief so they can afford essentials like food, medicine, diapers, phone bills and housing,” said Massachusetts representative Richard E. Neal. the chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. “It is sneaky and cruel for the president to refuse to sign the law now and possibly end this brutal year by causing even more pain and suffering to families in need.”

The president’s implicit threat to reject the spending package enraged Republicans on Capitol Hill, who said Mr. Trump’s reprimand of the legislation took them by surprise after overwhelming support for the bill. (In fact, many of Mr. Trump’s complaints concerned measures in state funding laws that were in line with White House budget requests.)

The direct payments were kept at half the original $ 1,200, approved in March under the $ 2.2 trillion stimulus bill, in part to reflect Republican reluctance, more than 1 trillion US dollars, and there is little evidence that a majority of Republicans would support such an increase.

“I hope the president will look back at this and conclude that it is best to sign the bill,” Republican Senator Roy Blunt told reporters this week. “I think it would be to the president’s advantage if we talked about his performance rather than questioning decisions made late in the administration, but again, Congress has very little control over what the president can say.”

Categories
Politics

Dominion Voting warns Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani of litigation

President Donald Trump’s attorney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani speaks to journalists outside the West Wing of the White House on July 1, 2020 in Washington, DC.

Chip Somodevilla | Getty Images

President Donald Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani and White House attorney Pat Cipollone have reportedly received letters from defamation attorneys instructing them to keep all records relating to allegations that the Dominion Voting Systems were operating played a key role that Trump allegedly cheated out of an election victory.

Giuliani was also warned by Dominion’s lawyers that “litigation regarding these issues is imminent,” according to a new report from CNN shown a copy of the letter.

The letters to Cipollone and Giuliani reportedly requested that Giuliani stop “making defamatory claims against Dominion,” leading to voting machines.

Trump, his campaign attorneys and allies, including attorney Sidney Powell, have alleged without evidence that illegal voting changes on election counting machines fraudulently passed the national presidential election on to Joe Biden.

Powell received a similar letter from Dominion’s attorneys last week about their “wild, knowingly baseless, and false allegations” about the company. The letter requested that she withdraw her claims and keep related documents.

Giuliani and a White House spokesman had no immediate comment when contacted by CNBC about CNN’s report. CNBC has contacted Dominion and its attorneys for comment.

The article followed a lawsuit brought by Dominion’s Director of Security, Eric Coomer, against the Trump campaign, Giuliani, Powell and a range of conservative media outlets.

Coomer’s lawsuit alleges that he has been the target of death threats and other harmful communications because of the defendants’ false claims about Dominion’s machines.

Dominion has posted a page on its website titled “Setting the Record Out: Facts and Rumors” addressing allegations about the company calling it “disinformation” and a threat to democracy.

“Baseless claims about the integrity of the system or the correctness of the results have been rejected by electoral authorities, subject matter experts and outside fact-checkers,” the site says.

“Malicious and misleading false claims about Dominion have created dangerous threats and harassment to the company and its employees, as well as to election officials.”

Biden was confirmed as the election winner by the electoral college last week. Trump has refused to admit defeat.

Categories
Politics

George Blake, British Spy Who Betrayed the West, Dies at 98

He was born as George Behar on November 11, 1922 in Rotterdam. His mother was a Dutch Protestant; His father Albert was a Turkish born Spanish Jew who fought against the Ottoman Empire in World War I. He was wounded, charged with gallantry, and received British citizenship. He settled in the Netherlands as a businessman.

When his father died in 1934, George went to Cairo to live with relatives, including a cousin, Henri Curiel, who became an Egyptian communist leader. He was visiting the Netherlands when World War II broke out in 1939. His mother and two sisters fled to England, but he joined the Dutch resistance, spreading news and collecting information for two years.

He retired to Britain, changed his last name to Blake, joined the Royal Navy, trained in submarines and was hired as a freshman by British intelligence during the war. He spoke fluent Dutch, German, Arabic and Hebrew as well as English, translated German documents and interrogated German prisoners.

After the war, he studied Russian at Cambridge – by then Philby, Burgess and Maclean had completed their espionage trade – and his teacher, who came from pre-revolutionary St. Petersburg, inspired him to love the Russian language and culture, a step in his conversion . He was then sent to Germany to build a network of British spies in Berlin and Hamburg. With the envelope of a naval attaché he recruited numerous agents.

Shortly before the start of the Korean War in 1950, Mr Blake was sent to Seoul, South Korea’s capital, under diplomatic cover to organize another espionage network. But he was captured by invading North Korean forces. He was detained in North Korea for three years and subjected to communist indoctrination.

He later denied that this affected his conversion, insisting that the American bombing of North Korea was the main factor. “The relentless bombing of small Korean villages by giant American flying forts,” killing “women, children and the elderly” appalled him, he said. “I was ashamed,” he added. “I felt obliged to the wrong side.”

Mr Blake said he met with a KGB officer in North Korea, agreed to become a Soviet agent, and immediately started disclosing secrets. He did not want payment and, to avoid suspicion, insisted on not being granted privileges and being released with other captured diplomats. When the Korean War ended in 1953, he was returned to Great Britain and received as a national hero.