Categories
Politics

Asian American Christians could possibly be key to victory

Georgia Democratic Senate candidates Raphael Warnock (R) and Jon Ossoff (L) clash their elbows during a “It’s Time to Vote” drive-in rally on December 28, 2020 in Stonecrest, Georgia.

Jessica McGowan | Getty Images

When Helen Ho founded Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Atlanta in 2010, she made public relations a central part of the organization’s civic engagement.

Growing up in Korean-American churches in South Carolina and Georgia, she understood the importance of religious groups to Asian Americans and Pacific islanders.

“When I was growing up, the Church was literally the only nonprofit that my parents gave money to,” said Ho, former executive director of the Georgia bipartisan advocacy group.

In American politics, the most prominent religious voter blocs have historically been Christians: white Evangelical voters, who were largely a Republican stronghold, and black Protestant voters, who mostly joined the Democrats.

Religious Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders or AAPIs in Georgia and across the country are not a monolith. Their beliefs include Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, and other traditions. Amid a black and white political and religious divide, Asian American Christian communities represent untapped voter networks for political parties.

In the Georgia Senate runoff election, Democrats increased the reach of AAPI voters overall in hopes of resuming the high turnout that helped turn the state blue in November. Incumbent GOP Sens. David Perdue and Kelly Loeffler will run a runoff against Democratic challengers Jon Ossoff and Rev. Raphael Warnock on January 5th to determine which party controls the Senate.

Faith was at the top of the runoff elections. Warnock is the senior pastor of Ebenezer Baptist Church, where Martin Luther King Jr. preached. Ossoff talks about his Jewish upbringing on the campaign. Perdue is a Methodist and Loeffler is a Catholic; The two have addressed conservative Christian voters.

But candidates on both sides of the aisle have largely overlooked the role of religion for Asian-American voters in helping them decide what is likely to be a thin line election.

Belief among Asian Americans

Asian American voters made up only about 3% of the Georgian electorate in 2019, but a historic surge in AAPI voters helped lead President-elect Joe Biden to victory in the state, according to Democratic data firm TargetSmart.

A 2012 study by the Pew Research Center found that a large number of Asian Americans in the US, approximately 42%, identify as Christians. The proportion of Christians among Koreans rises to 71% and among Filipino Americans to 89%.

Churches provide community centers and support networks for Asian Americans. Faith institutions are embedded in the growing AAPI communities in Georgia, and particularly in the Atlanta metropolitan area, said Helen Jin Kim, professor of religious history at Emory University’s Candler School of Theology, who also partners with local faith leaders and Asian-American advocacy groups.

“These church common rooms are really important when it comes to voting behavior, but they are often overlooked,” Kim said. “AAPIs are part of a diverse group of religious communities and it is important to be able to connect with these spaces as well.”

James Woo, communications manager and Korean outreach director for Advancing Justice-Atlanta, said AAPI churches are “the go-to place for us to share news with a larger community,” about impartial voter registration and voting efforts.

“Particularly for Asian immigrants and first-generation refugees who may not be part of the ‘mainstream’ or English-language press, they can get information about their society either through their faith group or through their home language press,” Ho said.

Political organization

During the 2018 midterm elections, Ho helped organize an early election campaign between Korean-American churches in the Atlanta area, inspired by the tradition of the black churches in the south.

However, there was less contact with AAPI communities from political groups through a religious appeal.

Ivanka Trump and Senators Kelly Loeffler (R-GA) and David Perdue (R-GA) wave to the crowd at a campaign rally on December 21, 2020 in Milton, Georgia.

Elijah Nouvelage | Getty Images

Unlike other groups of Christian voters, Asian-American Christians have not consolidated under either party, said Janelle Wong, a political scientist at the University of Maryland and author of Immigrants, Evangelicals and Politics in an Era of Demographic Change.

This is in contrast to the political affiliations of white Protestant voters and black Protestant voters. Before the 2020 presidential election, 78% of white registered voters supported GOP President Donald Trump, while 90% of black registered voters supported Democratic President-elect Joe Biden, the Pew Research Center found.

Wong’s research found that AAPI Christian voters are more conservative than Asian Americans, who do not identify as evangelical but are more liberal than their white evangelical counterparts. Asian-American evangelicals often join the Republican Party on some social issues such as abortion, but the Democrats on issues such as immigration, health care, and race.

Political and social views also vary between different communities because the Asian-American identity encompasses a wide range of races, cultures, and experiences.

“For Democrats, in a way, there’s more thematic focus, but there’s not much mobilization,” Wong said. “Until recently, there hasn’t been the same concentrated effort among the Democrats for Asian Americans with religious backgrounds or Asian Americans as a whole.”

The Georgia Senate is expiring

The Perdue Campaign, Warnock Campaign, and Georgia Democratic Party did not respond to CNBC’s requests for comments to contact Asian American Christian communities. The Loeffler campaign referred CNBC to the Georgia GOP, which released a press release on their updated Asia-Pacific-American advisory board but did not provide details on how to contact AAPI Christian communities.

The Ossoff Campaign has hosted dozens of AAPI faith events over the year, including targeted contacts with Ismaili communities, visits to mosques, and virtual events and meetings with AAPI faith leaders.

Cam Ashling, Osoff’s AAPI constituency director, “has made engaging AAPI voters in Georgia a key element of the campaign to mobilize AAPI voters across the state,” the campaign said.

Ashling hosted a call with Korean-American pastors in Augusta and, according to the campaign, partnered with a coalition called AAPI Christians for Biden.

AAPI Christians for Biden said it had a press conference scheduled for December 17 with Korean-American pastors from Atlanta to support the Democratic Senate candidates ahead of the runoff elections. According to one of the organizers, the Ossoff campaign said it couldn’t participate while on a bus tour and showed an interest in doing something in the near future.

The Warnock campaign worked with the coalition ahead of the scheduled press conference, the organizers said, but the event failed the day before. The Warnock campaign announced in an email that there was a planning conflict.

Rev. Byeong Han, a pastor with the Korean Central Presbyterian Church in Atlanta, was one of the speakers scheduled for the press conference. There are certain restrictions on the partisan activity of the churches in order to maintain their tax exemption status. However, these restrictions do not apply to impartiality or religious leaders acting in their personal capacity.

Han said that while some of his pastors in Korean and Asia-American ministries are concerned about discussing politics, he firmly believes that civic engagement is important for AAPI Christians.

“Ever since I came to this church, I have been encouraging my ward to do their voter registration and vote,” Han said. “I usually tell my members that this is not about politics. This is about the rights and responsibilities of citizens.”

Han hopes that more Asian American Christian communities will continue to participate in the political process.

“Asian Americans are very important in this election and beyond,” Han said. “So let’s step up, don’t step back.”

Categories
Politics

Congress Poised to Apply Banking Laws to Antiquities Market

The antiques trade, long feared by regulators as a fertile ground for money laundering and other illegal activities, will be subject to more scrutiny under the laws passed by Congress on Friday that override President Trump’s veto.

The provisions to tighten control of the antique market were included in the sprawling National Defense Authorization Bill vetoed by Mr Trump last week and which the House and Senate overruled Monday and Friday.

Regulators have long feared that the opacity of the antique trade, where buyers and sellers themselves are rarely identified to the parties to a transaction, has made it an easy way to disguise illegal money transfers. The new legislation empowers federal regulators to develop measures to break the secrecy of transactions.

“We believe this type of legislation is long overdue,” said John Byrne, an attorney with 30 years of anti-money laundering experience. “This is an area where clearly organized crime, terrorists and oligarchs have used cultural artifacts to move illicit funds.”

The dealers resisted the move. With the new legislation, however, Congress expanded the 1970 Banking Secrecy Act, which strengthened federal control over financial transactions, to include trading in ancient artifacts.

Exactly how the new law works will be determined next year by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, an office of the finance department, in consultation with the private sector, law enforcement agencies and the public. Legal experts expect the new rules for antiques to be similar to those of the precious metals and jewelry industries, with certain transactions reported to authorities who will then determine if they are suspicious. The law also seeks to end the use of shell companies to hide the identity of buyers and sellers.

The sponsors of the new measure described it as an urgently needed reform.

“For the past decade, we’ve worked with all industries and stakeholders to come up with a bill that will satisfy everyone,” said New York Democrat Carolyn B. Maloney, who introduced the Corporate Transparency Act in 2019 and later led the bill into it Defense Package. “We have got to the point where we have built so much support that it became impossible to defy the bill.”

The Corporate Transparency Act has been opposed by antique dealers who opposed the obligation to disclose customer information and the additional costs of complying with the law. The art industry has fought against similar laws that would have extended the banking secrecy law to the art market.

Federal data shows that Christie’s auction house has paid lobbyists more than $ 100,000 in the past two years to influence the results of such actions. A spokeswoman for the auction house, Erin McAndrew, said the compliance department already complies with anti-money laundering standards that were passed by the European Union in 2018.

She said that “Christie’s welcomes the opportunity to work with US regulators on appropriate and enforceable” anti-money laundering policies in the art market.

Guard dogs have been calling on Congress for years to tighten regulations on the antiques trade. The looting of heritage sites in countries like Syria and Iraq has created a growing black market for antiques from the Middle East. Law enforcement agencies abroad have confiscated hundreds of artifacts that officials believe may have resulted from previous excavations carried out by terrorist groups such as ISIS.

“The proposed legislation will start to fill a huge void,” said Tess Davis, executive director of the Antiquities Coalition, a nonprofit that oversees the illicit trade in artifacts.

“The business model of a pawn shop is not that different from that of a Sotheby’s or Christie’s,” she added. Pawnbrokers, however, fall under the scope of the Banking Secrecy Act, but auction houses do not. “Why should the rules of a corner shop selling stereos in Milwaukee be stricter than a billion-dollar auction house in Manhattan?”

However, some traders claim that reports of black market transactions and money laundering are exaggerated. A trader, Randall A. Hixenbaugh, the president of a nonprofit called the American Council for the Preservation of Cultural Property, has called statistics on trafficking unfounded and opposed the new regulations.

“Virtually all large dollar transactions in the antique art business are conducted through financial institutions and instruments that are already covered by the Banking Secrecy Act,” said Hixenbaugh. “Criminals who want to launder illegitimate funds could hardly choose a worse good than antiques.”

Legislatures that helped draft the new rules said they were guided by what they learned from Congressional hearings and from industry experts. Unesco warned in 2020 that the development of online sales platforms and social networks had facilitated the illegal sale of antiques and that existing regulations could not contain the black market.

The new legislation calls for a study on the role of art in money laundering and terrorist financing. (A recent Senate report outlined how at least two Russian oligarchs exploited the opaqueness of the art world to evade US sanctions.) If the study finds a link between the art market and illegal activity, it could be after review Congress triggered the creation of rules similar to those that now apply to the antiques trade. The regulators have also signaled that the banking secrecy law could be further extended to the art market.

“You need to know who is buying and selling,” said Byrne. “The argument that you are not required to report suspicious activity because you are in the private sector does not work. Banks lost that argument 30 years ago. “

Categories
Politics

Trump price range chief refuses to direct workers to assist with Biden spending plans

Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Russell Vought speaks to reporters during a press conference at the White House in Washington, the United States, on March 11, 2019.

Jonathan Ernst | Reuters

The head of the White House budget office on Thursday refused to direct staff and resources to help with the incoming Biden administration’s spending plans in an escalating dispute over the bureau’s responsibilities during the transition process.

Russ Vought, Office of Management and Budget Director, pushed back allegations of disability made by President-elect Joe Biden’s transition team, adding that his agency will not partner with alleged efforts to “dismantle” Trump administrative policies.

“Our system of government has a president and an administration,” said Vought in a letter to Biden’s interim chief Ted Kaufman.

Vought’s letter, posted publicly on his Twitter account, fueled the smoldering dispute between President Donald Trump’s administration and the incoming Biden team.

Biden spokesman Andrew Bates in a statement called it “unacceptable” amid a time of economic hardship, “hampering the US government’s ability to budget and efficiently aid those most in need, in particular explicit reasons. ” , declared partiality. “

“The last two paragraphs of this letter confirm exactly what the transition said yesterday and contradict the opening of the letter with an openly political admission of what is really happening – given the way OMB works during each change of president for decades,” said Bates . “The president-elect will continue to work in good faith to get our country out of this emergency as soon as possible. There is a responsible approach.”

In a speech Monday, Biden highlighted OMB and Defense Department leaders for putting up “roadblocks” that are hindering his efforts to prepare for the presidency.

“Right now we just don’t get all of the information we need from the outgoing administration in key national security areas,” Biden said at the time. “In my opinion, it’s nothing less than irresponsibility.”

Acting defense chief Christopher Miller responded later that day, saying in a statement that the Pentagon’s efforts “have already exceeded those of the youngest administrations in more than three weeks”.

In a virtual briefing on Wednesday, the new White House press secretary Jen Psaki and Biden’s advisor Yohannes Abraham criticized these agencies again.

“There is no question that the process will be delayed by what we’ve seen from the outgoing OMB,” said Abraham. “It takes many man-hours to prepare the budget and requires the analytical support that was part of OMB’s commitment to previous transitions that we did not receive.”

In the past, the OMB provided incoming administrations with economic and budgetary information well in advance of Inauguration Day in order to prepare them for the swift presentation of the new President’s budget. The document is technically due on the first Monday in February, but has been delayed in the past.

Bloomberg reported earlier Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter, that Vought was preventing members of the Biden team from meeting with household officials to finalize and publish new regulations before the Trump administration comes to an end.

In his letter to Kaufman, Vought said the record shows that “OMB has fully participated in reasonable transition efforts.”

Vought said the budget agency held more than 45 meetings with Biden staff and provided “all information requested” about ongoing programs. He also said Biden’s team was briefed on the Trump administration’s coronavirus relief efforts, including Operation Warp Speed, the White House’s vaccine development and distribution plan.

“What we didn’t and won’t do is use current OMB staff to write this [Biden transition team’s] Legislative proposals to dismantle the work of this government, “Vought said in his letter.

“OMB staff are working on the policies of this administration and will continue to do so through the last day of their term. Redirecting staff and resources to develop your team’s budget proposals is not the responsibility of the OMB transition.”

Vought added, “OMB will not get involved in developing strategies that weaken border security, undermine the president’s deregulatory successes, and draft budgets that will bankrupt America.”

Categories
Politics

In Trump’s Last Chapter, a Failure to Rise to the Covid-19 Second

WASHINGTON — It was a warm summer Wednesday, Election Day was looming and President Trump was even angrier than usual at the relentless focus on the coronavirus pandemic.

“You’re killing me! This whole thing is! We’ve got all the damn cases,” Mr. Trump yelled at Jared Kushner, his son-in-law and senior adviser, during a gathering of top aides in the Oval Office on Aug. 19. “I want to do what Mexico does. They don’t give you a test till you get to the emergency room and you’re vomiting.”

Mexico’s record in fighting the virus was hardly one for the United States to emulate. But the president had long seen testing not as a vital way to track and contain the pandemic but as a mechanism for making him look bad by driving up the number of known cases.

And on that day he was especially furious after being informed by Dr. Francis S. Collins, the head of the National Institutes of Health, that it would be days before the government could give emergency approval to the use of convalescent plasma as a treatment, something Mr. Trump was eager to promote as a personal victory going into the Republican National Convention the following week.

“They’re Democrats! They’re against me!” he said, convinced that the government’s top doctors and scientists were conspiring to undermine him. “They want to wait!”

Throughout late summer and fall, in the heat of a re-election campaign that he would go on to lose, and in the face of mounting evidence of a surge in infections and deaths far worse than in the spring, Mr. Trump’s management of the crisis — unsteady, unscientific and colored by politics all year — was in effect reduced to a single question: What would it mean for him?

The result, according to interviews with more than two dozen current and former administration officials and others in contact with the White House, was a lose-lose situation. Mr. Trump not only ended up soundly defeated by Joseph R. Biden Jr., but missed his chance to show that he could rise to the moment in the final chapter of his presidency and meet the defining challenge of his tenure.

Efforts by his aides to persuade him to promote mask wearing, among the simplest and most effective ways to curb the spread of the disease, were derailed by his conviction that his political base would rebel against anything that would smack of limiting their personal freedom. Even his own campaign’s polling data to the contrary could not sway him.

His explicit demand for a vaccine by Election Day — a push that came to a head in a contentious Oval Office meeting with top health aides in late September — became a misguided substitute for warning the nation that failure to adhere to social distancing and other mitigation efforts would contribute to a slow-rolling disaster this winter.

His concern? That the man he called “Sleepy Joe” Biden, who was leading him in the polls, would get credit for a vaccine, not him.

The government’s public health experts were all but silenced by the arrival in August of Dr. Scott W. Atlas, the Stanford professor of neuroradiology recruited after appearances on Fox News.

With Dr. Deborah L. Birx, the coordinator of the White House virus task force, losing influence and often on the road, Dr. Atlas became the sole doctor Mr. Trump listened to. His theories, some of which scientists viewed as bordering on the crackpot, were exactly what the president wanted to hear: The virus is overblown, the number of deaths is exaggerated, testing is overrated, lockdowns do more harm than good.

As the gap between politics and science grew, the infighting that Mr. Trump had allowed to plague the administration’s response from the beginning only intensified. Threats of firings worsened the leadership vacuum as key figures undercut each other and distanced themselves from responsibility.

The administration had some positive stories to tell. Mr. Trump’s vaccine development program, Operation Warp Speed, had helped drive the pharmaceutical industry’s remarkably fast progress in developing several promising approaches. By the end of the year, two highly effective vaccines would be approved for emergency use, providing hope for 2021.

The White House rejected any suggestions that the president’s response had fallen short, saying he had worked to provide adequate testing, protective equipment and hospital capacity and that the vaccine development program had succeeded in record time.

“President Trump has led the largest mobilization of the public and private sectors since WWII to defeat Covid-19 and save lives,” said Brian Morgenstern, a White House spokesman.

But Mr. Trump’s unwillingness to put aside his political self-centeredness as Americans died by the thousands each day or to embrace the steps necessary to deal with the crisis remains confounding even to some administration officials. “Making masks a culture war issue was the dumbest thing imaginable,” one former senior adviser said.

His own bout with Covid-19 in early October left him extremely ill and dependent on care and drugs not available to most Americans, including a still-experimental monoclonal antibody treatment, and he saw firsthand how the disease coursed through the White House and some of his close allies.

Yet his instinct was to treat that experience not as a learning moment or an opportunity for empathy, but as a chance to portray himself as a Superman who had vanquished the disease. His own experience to the contrary, he assured a crowd at the White House just a week after his hospitalization, “It’s going to disappear; it is disappearing.”

Weeks after his own recovery, he would still complain about the nation’s preoccupation with the pandemic.

“All you hear is Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid, Covid,” Mr. Trump said at one campaign stop, uttering the word 11 times.

In the end he could not escape it.

By late July, new cases were at record highs, defying Mr. Trump’s predictions through the spring that the virus was under control, and deaths were spiking to alarming levels. Herman Cain, a 2012 Republican presidential candidate, died from the coronavirus; the previous month he had attended a Trump rally without a mask.

With the pandemic defining the campaign despite Mr. Trump’s efforts to make it about law and order, Tony Fabrizio, the president’s main pollster, came to the Oval Office for a meeting in the middle of the summer prepared to make a surprising case: that mask wearing was acceptable even among Mr. Trump’s supporters.

Arrayed in front of the Resolute Desk, Mr. Trump’s advisers listened as Mr. Fabrizio presented the numbers. According to his research, some of which was reported by The Washington Post, voters believed the pandemic was bad and getting worse, they were more concerned about getting sick than about the virus’s effects on their personal financial situation, the president’s approval rating on handling the pandemic had hit new lows and a little more than half the country did not think he was taking the situation seriously.

But what set off debate that day was Mr. Fabrizio’s finding that more than 70 percent of voters in the states being targeted by the campaign supported mandatory mask wearing in public, at least indoors, including a majority of Republicans.

Mr. Kushner, who along with Hope Hicks, another top adviser, had been trying for months to convince Mr. Trump that masks could be portrayed as the key to regaining freedom to go safely to a restaurant or a sporting event, called embracing mask-wearing a “no-brainer.”

Mr. Kushner had some reason for optimism. Mr. Trump had agreed to wear one not long before for a visit to Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, after finding one he believed he looked good in: dark blue, with a presidential seal.

But Mark Meadows, the White House chief of staff — backed up by other aides including Stephen Miller — said the politics for Mr. Trump would be devastating.

“The base will revolt,” Mr. Meadows said, adding that he was not sure Mr. Trump could legally make it happen in any case.

That was all Mr. Trump needed to hear. “I’m not doing a mask mandate,” he concluded.

Aside from when he was sick, he was rarely seen in a mask again.

The president had other opportunities to show leadership rather than put his political fortunes first.

Covid-19 Vaccines ›

Answers to Your Vaccine Questions

With distribution of a coronavirus vaccine beginning in the U.S., here are answers to some questions you may be wondering about:

    • If I live in the U.S., when can I get the vaccine? While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary by state, most will likely put medical workers and residents of long-term care facilities first. If you want to understand how this decision is getting made, this article will help.
    • When can I return to normal life after being vaccinated? Life will return to normal only when society as a whole gains enough protection against the coronavirus. Once countries authorize a vaccine, they’ll only be able to vaccinate a few percent of their citizens at most in the first couple months. The unvaccinated majority will still remain vulnerable to getting infected. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines are showing robust protection against becoming sick. But it’s also possible for people to spread the virus without even knowing they’re infected because they experience only mild symptoms or none at all. Scientists don’t yet know if the vaccines also block the transmission of the coronavirus. So for the time being, even vaccinated people will need to wear masks, avoid indoor crowds, and so on. Once enough people get vaccinated, it will become very difficult for the coronavirus to find vulnerable people to infect. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve that goal, life might start approaching something like normal by the fall 2021.
    • If I’ve been vaccinated, do I still need to wear a mask? Yes, but not forever. Here’s why. The coronavirus vaccines are injected deep into the muscles and stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies. This appears to be enough protection to keep the vaccinated person from getting ill. But what’s not clear is whether it’s possible for the virus to bloom in the nose — and be sneezed or breathed out to infect others — even as antibodies elsewhere in the body have mobilized to prevent the vaccinated person from getting sick. The vaccine clinical trials were designed to determine whether vaccinated people are protected from illness — not to find out whether they could still spread the coronavirus. Based on studies of flu vaccine and even patients infected with Covid-19, researchers have reason to be hopeful that vaccinated people won’t spread the virus, but more research is needed. In the meantime, everyone — even vaccinated people — will need to think of themselves as possible silent spreaders and keep wearing a mask. Read more here.
    • Will it hurt? What are the side effects? The Pfizer and BioNTech vaccine is delivered as a shot in the arm, like other typical vaccines. The injection into your arm won’t feel different than any other vaccine, but the rate of short-lived side effects does appear higher than a flu shot. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported any serious health problems. The side effects, which can resemble the symptoms of Covid-19, last about a day and appear more likely after the second dose. Early reports from vaccine trials suggest some people might need to take a day off from work because they feel lousy after receiving the second dose. In the Pfizer study, about half developed fatigue. Other side effects occurred in at least 25 to 33 percent of patients, sometimes more, including headaches, chills and muscle pain. While these experiences aren’t pleasant, they are a good sign that your own immune system is mounting a potent response to the vaccine that will provide long-lasting immunity.
    • Will mRNA vaccines change my genes? No. The vaccines from Moderna and Pfizer use a genetic molecule to prime the immune system. That molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse to a cell, allowing the molecule to slip in. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus, which can stimulate the immune system. At any moment, each of our cells may contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules, which they produce in order to make proteins of their own. Once those proteins are made, our cells then shred the mRNA with special enzymes. The mRNA molecules our cells make can only survive a matter of minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a bit longer, so that the cells can make extra virus proteins and prompt a stronger immune response. But the mRNA can only last for a few days at most before they are destroyed.

After he recovered from his bout with the virus, some of his top aides, including Mr. Kushner and Jason Miller, a senior campaign strategist, thought the illness offered an opportunity to demonstrate the kind of compassion and resolve about the pandemic’s toll that Mr. Trump had so far failed to show.

When Mr. Trump returned from the hospital, his communications aides, with the help of Ivanka Trump, his daughter, urged him to deliver a national address in which he would say: “I had it. It was tough, it kicked my ass, but we’re going to get through it.”

He refused, choosing instead to address a boisterous campaign rally for himself from the balcony of the White House overlooking the South Lawn.

Mr. Trump never came around to the idea that he had a responsibility to be a role model, much less that his leadership role might require him to publicly acknowledge hard truths about the virus — or even to stop insisting that the issue was not a rampaging pandemic but too much testing.

Alex M. Azar II, the health and human services secretary, briefed the president this fall on a Japanese study documenting the effectiveness of face masks, telling him: “We have the proof. They work.” But the president resisted, criticizing Mr. Kushner for pushing them and again blaming too much testing — an area Mr. Kushner had been helping to oversee — for his problems.

“I’m going to lose,” Mr. Trump told Mr. Kushner during debate preparations. “And it’s going to be your fault, because of the testing.”

Mr. Morgenstern, the White House spokesman, said that exchange between the president and Mr. Kushner “never happened.”

Mr. Azar, who was sometimes one of the few people wearing a mask at White House events, privately bemoaned what he called a political, anti-mask culture set by Mr. Trump. At White House Christmas parties, Mr. Azar asked maskless guests to back away from him.

The decision to run the government’s response out of the West Wing was made in the early days of the pandemic. The idea was to break down barriers between disparate agencies, assemble public health expertise and encourage quick and coordinated decision-making.

It did not work out like that, and by fall the consequences were clear.

Mr. Trump had always tolerated if not encouraged clashes among subordinates, a tendency that in this case led only to policy paralysis, confusion about who was in charge and a lack of a clear, consistent message about how to reduce the risks from the pandemic.

Keeping decision-making power close to him was another Trump trait, but in this case it also elevated the myriad choices facing the administration to the presidential level, bogging the process down in infighting, raising the political stakes and encouraging aides to jockey for favor with Mr. Trump.

The result at times was a systemwide failure that extended well beyond the president.

“What we needed was a coordinated response that involved contributions from multiple agencies,” said Dr. Scott Gottlieb, who was commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration for the first two years of the Trump administration.

“Someone needed to pull that all together early,” he said. “It wasn’t the job of the White House, either. This needed to happen closer to the agencies. That didn’t happen on testing, or on a whole lot of other things.”

The relationship between Mr. Azar and Dr. Stephen M. Hahn, the commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration, grew increasingly tense; by early November, they were communicating only by text and in meetings.

Dr. Birx had lost the clout she enjoyed early on in the crisis and spent much of the summer and fall on the road counseling governors and state health officials.

Mr. Meadows was at odds with almost everyone as he sought to impose the president’s will on scientists and public health professionals. In conversations with top health officials, Mr. Meadows would rail against regulatory “bureaucrats” he thought were more interested in process than outcome.

Some of the doctors on the task force, including Dr. Anthony S. Fauci and Dr. Robert R. Redfield, were reluctant to show up in person at the White House, worried that the disdain there for mask wearing and social distancing would leave them at risk of infection.

Vice President Mike Pence was nominally in charge of the task force but was so cautious about getting crosswise with Mr. Trump as they battled for re-election that, in public at least, he became nearly invisible.

The debates inside the White House increasingly revolved around Dr. Atlas, who had no formal training in infectious diseases but whose views — which Mr. Trump saw him deliver on Fox News — appealed to the president’s belief that the crisis was overblown.

His arrival at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue was itself something of a mystery. Some aides said he was discovered by Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary. Others said John McEntee, the president’s personnel chief, had been Googling for a Trump-friendly doctor who would be loyal.

Marc Short, Mr. Pence’s chief of staff, opposed hiring Dr. Atlas. But once the president and his team brought him in, Mr. Short insisted that Dr. Atlas have a seat at the task force table, hoping to avoid having him become yet another internal — and destructive — critic.

Once inside, Dr. Atlas used the perch of a West Wing office to shape the response. During a meeting in early fall, Dr. Atlas asserted that college students were at no risk from the virus. We should let them go back to school, he said. It’s not a problem.

Dr. Birx exploded. What aspect of the fact that you can be asymptomatic and still spread it do you not understand? she demanded. You might not die, but you can give it to somebody who can die from it. She was livid.

“Your strategy is literally going to cost us lives,” she yelled at Dr. Atlas. She attacked Dr. Atlas’s ideas in daily emails she sent to senior officials. And she was mindful of a pact she had made with Dr. Hahn, Dr. Fauci and Dr. Redfield even before Dr. Atlas came on board: They would stick together if one of them was fired for doing what they considered the right thing.

Health officials often had a hard time finding an audience in the upper reaches of the West Wing. In a mid-November task force meeting, they issued a dire warning to Mr. Meadows about the looming surge in cases set to devastate the country. Mr. Meadows demanded data to back up their claim.

One outcome of the meeting was a Nov. 19 news conference on the virus’s dire threat, the first in many weeks. But while Mr. Pence, who led the briefing, often urged Americans to “do their part” to slow the spread of the virus, he never directly challenged Mr. Trump’s hesitancy on masks and social distancing. At the briefing, he said that “decision making at the local level” was key, continuing a long pattern of the administration seeking to push responsibility to the states.

Mr. Azar had been cut out of key decision-making as early as February, when Mr. Pence took over the task force. Mr. Azar would complain to his associates that Mr. Pence’s staff and task force members went around him to issue orders to his subordinates.

On tenterhooks about his job status, Mr. Azar found an opening that offered a kind of redemption, steering his attention through the summer and fall to Operation Warp Speed, the government’s effort to support rapid development of a vaccine, lavishing praise on Mr. Trump and crediting him for nearly every advance.

Behind the scenes, Mr. Azar portrayed Dr. Hahn to the White House as a flailing manager — a complaint he also voiced about Dr. Redfield. In late September, he told the White House he was willing to fire Dr. Hahn, according to officials familiar with the offer.

For their part, Dr. Hahn, Dr. Redfield, Dr. Birx and other senior health officials saw Mr. Azar as crushing the morale of the agencies he oversaw as he sought to escape blame for a worsening crisis and to strengthen his own image publicly and with the White House.

Health officials on the task force several times took their complaints about Mr. Azar to Mr. Pence’s office, hoping for an intervention.

Caitlin B. Oakley, a spokeswoman for Mr. Azar, said he had “always stood up for balanced, scientific, public health information and insisted that science and data drive the decisions.”

Once eager to visit the White House, Dr. Hahn became disillusioned with what he saw as its efforts to politicize the work of the Food and Drug Administration, and he eventually shied away from task force meetings, fearing his statements there would leak.

If there was a bureaucratic winner in this West Wing cage match, it was Dr. Atlas.

He told Mr. Trump that the right way to think about the virus was how much “excess mortality” there was above what would have been expected without a pandemic.

Mr. Trump seized on the idea, often telling aides that the real number of dead was no more than 10,000 people.

As of Thursday, 342,577 Americans had died from the pandemic.

In an Oval Office meeting with senior health officials on Sept. 24, the president made explicit what he had long implied: He wanted a vaccine before the election, according to three people who witnessed his demand.

Pfizer’s chief executive had been encouraging the belief that the company could deliver initial results by late October. But Mr. Trump’s aides tried in vain to make clear that they could not completely control the timing.

Dr. Fauci and Dr. Hahn reminded West Wing officials that a company’s vaccine trial results were a “black box,” impossible to see until an independent monitoring board revealed them. A vaccine that did not go through the usual, rigorous government approval process would be a “Pyrrhic victory,” Mr. Azar told them. It would be a shot no one would take.

Dr. Moncef Slaoui, the scientific leader of Operation Warp Speed, said the president never asked him to deliver a vaccine on a specific timetable. But he said Mr. Trump sometimes complained in meetings that “it was not going to happen before the election and it will be ‘Sleepy Joe’” who would ultimately get credit.

In late October, science and regulations worked against Mr. Trump’s waning hopes for pre-Election Day good news. At the F.D.A., scientists had refined the standards for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use. And at Pfizer, executives realized that the agency was unlikely to authorize its vaccine on the basis of so few Covid-19 cases among its clinical trial volunteers.

They decided to wait for more data, a delay of up to a week.

When Pfizer announced on Nov. 9 — two days after Mr. Biden clinched his victory — that its vaccine was a stunning success, Mr. Trump was furious. He lashed out at the company, Dr. Hahn and the F.D.A., accusing “deep state regulators” of conspiring with Pfizer to slow approval until after the election.

The president’s frustration with the pace of regulatory action would continue into December, as the F.D.A. went through a time-consuming process of evaluating Pfizer’s data and then that of a second vaccine maker, Moderna.

On Dec. 11, Mr. Meadows exploded during a morning call with Dr. Hahn and Dr. Peter Marks, the agency’s top vaccine regulator. He accused Dr. Hahn of mismanagement and suggested he resign, then slammed down the phone. That night, the F.D.A. authorized the Pfizer vaccine.

In the weeks that followed, Mr. Pence, Mr. Azar, Dr. Fauci and other health officials rolled up their sleeves to be vaccinated for the cameras.

Mr. Trump, who after contracting Covid-19 had declared himself immune, has not announced plans to be vaccinated.

Michael D. Shear, Noah Weiland, Sharon LaFraniere and Mark Mazzetti reported from Washington, and Maggie Haberman from New York. Katie Thomas contributed reporting from Chicago.

Categories
Politics

David Perdue quarantines after Covid contact

Georgia Senator David Perdue went into quarantine after contacting someone who tested positive for Covid-19, his campaign announced on Thursday, less than a week before the Republican runoff against Democrat Jon Ossoff.

Perdue and his wife Bonnie tested negative for the coronavirus according to their campaign, which did not specify how long the 71-year-old incumbent senator would be in quarantine.

His contest against Ossoff is one of two runoff elections in Georgia on Tuesday that will determine whether Republicans or Democrats will have majority control over the US Senate starting next month.

In the other race, incumbent Senator Kelly Loeffler, Perdue’s Republican, meets Democrat Rev. Raphael Warnock. Recent polls suggest close races in any runoff election.

Perdue was due to perform with Loeffler on Thursday afternoon at a New Year’s Eve rally and concert in Gainesville.

The guidelines issued by the Federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention require that people exposed to a person with Covid stay at home for 14 days after their last contact with an infected person.

“This morning Senator Perdue was informed that he had come into close contact with someone in the campaign who tested positive for COVID-19,” said a statement from Perdue’s campaign.

“Both Senator Perdue and his wife tested negative today, but according to his doctor’s recommendations and CDC guidelines, they will be quarantined,” the campaign said.

“The Senator and his wife have been tested regularly throughout the campaign and the team will continue to follow CDC guidelines. More information will be provided as it becomes available.”

Ossoff later tweeted, “I hope David, Bonnie, the campaign staff and supporters stay healthy and COVID negative.”

Loeffler quarantined himself at the start of the race after receiving inconclusive Covid test results on November 21. She has not tested positive for the virus.

Senator David Perdue (R-GA) speaks during a campaign rally as he runs for re-election at the Olde Blind Dog Irish pub in Milton, Georgia on December 21, 2020.

Al Drago | Reuters

In the final days leading up to Tuesday’s runoff election, Republicans stepped up their efforts to get a vote as data shows that Democrats enjoyed an advantage in turnout.

When asked during a Fox News interview how closely she and Perdue coordinated their drainage efforts, Loeffler said, “Our campaigns have come together in a nationwide operation of 1,000 people with 40,000 volunteers and 8,000 election monitors. So we all work hard one day to get out across Georgia and work with the Georgia voters and make sure they know what this is about. They know they’ll turn out. “

“The future of the country is at stake,” said Loeffler of the runoff election.

President Donald Trump is said to be promoting Perdue and Loeffler in Georgia on Monday.

President-elect Joe Biden will travel to Atlanta on Monday, and Vice-President-elect Kamala Harris plans to visit Savannah on Sunday to surprise Ossoff and Warnock in the final push before election day.

If Perdue and Loeffler both win their runoff elections, Republicans will hold a 52-seat majority in the Senate. The Democratic caucus, made up of two independents, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders and Maine’s Angus King, would have 48 seats.

If Ossoff and Warnock win, the Democratic caucus would have 50 seats. With the groundbreaking vote by Vice-President-Elect Harris, this would put the Democrats in control of the Senate. Democrats currently hold the House of Representatives and will continue to do so in 2021, despite losing a number of seats in that Chamber.

The Covid crisis was an important topic in the election campaign. Perdue, in particular, was scrutinized by the Democrats over allegations of improper stock trading at the start of the pandemic.

Ossoff and Warnock have criticized Perdue and Loeffler’s handling of the crisis, while the incumbent senators have accused the Democrats of stalling efforts to get an aid package through.

More recently, Ossoff and Perdue used Trump’s call for $ 2,000 stimulus checks as an opportunity to criticize Senate Republicans for speaking out against a larger direct payment earlier in the Covid aid negotiation process. Perdue and Loeffler, who have strongly allied themselves with Trump, later parted ways with many Senate Republicans to support the president’s call for greater direct payments.

Georgia has reported more than 647,800 cases of Covid this year, with 10,846 deaths attributable to the coronavirus in the state.

More than 2.8 million Georgians have already voted in Wednesday’s runoff elections, a record turnout for such a competition in the state.

Categories
Politics

Ben Sasse Slams Republican Effort to Problem Election

Mr Trump has continued to falsely claim that Mr Biden wrongly won the election because of widespread electoral fraud, and has called for Republicans in Congress to work to dismiss the results. Attorney General William P. Barr has acknowledged that the Department of Justice has not uncovered any such fraud that would have altered the outcome, and the Supreme Court as well as courts in at least eight key states across the country have rejected the challenges carried out by the EU or rejected the Trump campaign, to discard the election results. These challenges have come nowhere near outperforming results in a single state.

Even so, there is a significant divide within the party. While a steady stream of House Republicans have expressed their willingness to object to the electoral votes of critical states, Hawley is the first Senator to do so. He hinted on Wednesday that other senators might soon join his efforts, telling reporters, “A number of offices have reached out to ours through staff and said, ‘We’re interested.

He launched a fundraiser on Thursday highlighting his plan. “We have to make sure that one voice means one voice in America,” read the message, which was next to a photo of Mr. Hawley and Mr. Trump. “I plan to object to the results of the electoral college on January 6, but I need your help.”

It is unclear how many – if any – of his Senate colleagues will stand by his side.

But it already creates some sort of test for Republicans and their allies who are forced to take sides and either support Mr Trump or oppose his efforts to overthrow the elections.

His announcement on Wednesday met with a clear lack of enthusiasm in many conservative circles. Senator Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky and majority leader, had stopped lawmakers objecting to the results, arguing that a challenge would force Senators to enter the file, either against Mr. Trump or against the will of voters.

At a private conference call with Senate Republicans Thursday, Senator Patrick J. Toomey of Pennsylvania, who will retire in 2022, spoke out to demonstrate his “strong” opposition to Mr. Hawley’s plan, a spokesman for Mr. Toomey.

Mr. Hawley’s objection will force the Senate to consider his request for up to two hours, followed by a vote on Mr. Biden’s victory. With every Senate Democrat expected to confirm the election, as well as at least several Republicans, the Senate will likely confirm Mr Biden’s victory. The house, which also has to hold the same vote, is controlled by Democrats, making certification a certainty.

Categories
Politics

Trump, Melania will return to White Home, skip Mar-a-Lago New Yr’s bash

US President Donald Trump is pictured in his armored vehicle as he leaves his Mar-a-Lago resort in West Palm Beach, Florida, USA on December 31, 2020.

Tom Brenner | Reuters

President Donald Trump and First Lady Melania Trump will be returning to the White House on Thursday to shorten their long Palm Beach vacation break and skip a New Year’s Eve blowout at his Mar-a-Lago resort.

The planning notice came days before Congress was due to finalize President-elect Joe Biden’s victory, a virtually inevitable outcome that several Republicans object to delaying.

The President and First Lady are due to leave Florida for Washington at 11 a.m. ET, the White House said on Wednesday evening.

The departure was unexpected: news outlets reported that guests attending Mar-a-Lago’s annual New Year’s Eve gala had been told that Trump would be at the event. CNN reported Tuesday, citing a member of the resort, that at least 500 reservations had been confirmed to the party.

A receptionist in Mar-a-Lago declined to comment on the party. The White House declined to comment.

Since arriving in Palm Beach on Dec. 23, Trump has made comments mostly focused on the elections. He refuses to admit Biden despite repeated failures in court to reverse or invalidate the Democratic vote of the electoral college.

US President Donald Trump boardes Air Force One with First Lady Melania Trump at Palm Beach International Airport in Florida, USA, on December 31, 2020.

Tom Brenner | Reuters

These voters cast their votes on December 14; Biden won 306 votes to Trump’s 232.

On frequent trips to his golf club, Trump has visited Twitter to pressure Republican senators to “stand up for the presidency,” while spreading a number of baseless and debunked conspiracy theories about widespread election fraud.

On Wednesday, Republican Josh Hawley of Missouri became the first Senator to respond and said he would object when Congress counts the votes next week.

Several House Republicans have already vowed to contest the elections at this point. If a house member and a senator jointly object to a state’s electoral roll, the two houses must debate it separately and then vote on the objection.

Experts say there is no real chance of reversing the election result.

It is unclear how Trump will continue his print campaign in the days leading up to Biden’s victory being confirmed on Wednesday.

On Sunday he announced that he would travel to Georgia next Monday to campaign for Republicans Sens. Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue, the day before their two runoff elections, which determine which party controls the Senate.

Biden and Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will also visit Peach State to campaign for Democratic candidates Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock ahead of Tuesday’s election.

Categories
Politics

U.S. Officers Say Covid-19 Vaccination Effort Has Lagged

Vaccine distribution in the United States has started more slowly than expected, federal health officials confirmed in a press conference Wednesday, but also expressed confidence that the pace would accelerate in the coming weeks.

As of Wednesday, more than 14 million doses of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines had been shipped to the United States, up from 11.4 million doses on Monday morning. However, according to a dashboard from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, only 2.1 million people had received their first dose on Monday morning.

“We agree that this number is lower than hoped,” said Moncef Slaoui, scientific adviser to Operation Warp Speed, the federal effort to accelerate vaccine development and distribution. He added, “We know it should be better and we are working hard to do better.”

The 2.1 million doses administered by the CDC are an underestimate of the real number due to delays in reporting. And a CDC official said in a separate press conference Wednesday that 2.6 million people had received their first dose. Whatever the number, it falls far short of the goal that federal officials put forward just this month of having 20 million people vaccinated by the end of this year.

The Operation Warp Speed ​​press conference came the day after President-elect Joseph R. Biden Jr. gave a speech in Wilmington, Delaware, criticizing the Trump administration for these delays. Mr Biden said that at the current vaccination rate, it will take “years, not months” to protect the whole country.

When he takes office on January 20, Mr. Biden will employ a law called the Defense Production Act to “direct private industry to expedite the manufacture of the materials and protective equipment needed for vaccines.” However, the Trump administration has already used that law to expedite manufacturing and Mr Biden has given few details on how his plan will be different. He has promised to give 100 million shots in the first 100 days of his tenure – or enough for about 50 million people if he uses the two-dose vaccines.

Covid19 vaccinations>

Answers to your vaccine questions

With a coronavirus vaccine spreading out of the US, here are answers to some questions you may be wondering about:

    • If I live in the US, when can I get the vaccine? While the exact order of vaccine recipients may vary from state to state, most doctors and residents of long-term care facilities will come first. If you want to understand how this decision is made, this article will help.
    • When can I get back to normal life after the vaccination? Life will only get back to normal once society as a whole receives adequate protection against the coronavirus. Once countries have approved a vaccine, they can only vaccinate a few percent of their citizens in the first few months. The unvaccinated majority remain susceptible to infection. A growing number of coronavirus vaccines show robust protection against disease. However, it is also possible that people spread the virus without knowing they are infected because they have mild or no symptoms. Scientists don’t yet know whether the vaccines will also block the transmission of the coronavirus. Even vaccinated people have to wear masks for the time being, avoid the crowds indoors and so on. Once enough people are vaccinated, it becomes very difficult for the coronavirus to find people at risk to become infected. Depending on how quickly we as a society achieve this goal, life could approach a normal state in autumn 2021.
    • Do I still have to wear a mask after the vaccination? Yeah, but not forever. Here’s why. The coronavirus vaccines are injected deep into the muscles and stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies. This seems to be sufficient protection to protect the vaccinated person from disease. What is not clear, however, is whether it is possible for the virus to bloom in the nose – and sneeze or exhale to infect others – even if antibodies have been mobilized elsewhere in the body to prevent that vaccinated person gets sick. The vaccine clinical trials were designed to determine whether people who were vaccinated are protected from disease – not to find out whether they can still spread the coronavirus. Based on studies of flu vaccines and even patients infected with Covid-19, researchers have reason to hope that people who are vaccinated will not spread the virus, but more research is needed. In the meantime, everyone – including those who have been vaccinated – must imagine themselves as possible silent shakers and continue to wear a mask. Read more here.
    • Will it hurt What are the side effects? The vaccine against Pfizer and BioNTech, like other typical vaccines, is delivered as a shot in the arm. The injection in your arm feels no different than any other vaccine, but the rate of short-lived side effects seems to be higher than with the flu shot. Tens of thousands of people have already received the vaccines, and none of them have reported serious health problems. The side effects, which can be similar to symptoms of Covid-19, last about a day and are more likely to occur after the second dose. Early reports from vaccine trials suggest that some people may need to take a day off because they feel lousy after receiving the second dose. In the Pfizer study, around half developed fatigue. Other side effects occurred in at least 25 to 33 percent of patients, sometimes more, including headache, chills, and muscle pain. While these experiences are not pleasant, they are a good sign that your own immune system is having a potent response to the vaccine that provides lasting immunity.
    • Will mRNA vaccines change my genes? No. Moderna and Pfizer vaccines use a genetic molecule to boost the immune system. This molecule, known as mRNA, is eventually destroyed by the body. The mRNA is packaged in an oily bubble that can fuse with a cell, allowing the molecule to slide inside. The cell uses the mRNA to make proteins from the coronavirus that can stimulate the immune system. At any given moment, each of our cells can contain hundreds of thousands of mRNA molecules that they produce to make their own proteins. As soon as these proteins are made, our cells use special enzymes to break down the mRNA. The mRNA molecules that our cells make can only survive a few minutes. The mRNA in vaccines is engineered to withstand the cell’s enzymes a little longer, so the cells can make extra viral proteins and trigger a stronger immune response. However, the mRNA can hold for a few days at most before it is destroyed.

“This will be the greatest operational challenge we have ever faced as a nation,” said Biden, “but we will make it.”

In a tweet on Tuesday, President Trump appeared to blame the governors, saying it was “a matter for states to distribute the vaccines as soon as they are brought into designated areas by the federal government.” But several governors recently said their states were in trouble because they didn’t get enough money from the federal government.

Speaking at the Operation Warp Speed ​​press conference Wednesday, General Gustave F. Perna, the effort’s logistics director, said his team had no clear understanding of why these delays were occurring. He said the CDC is collecting data to better understand the factors driving slow absorption. “To get more specificity at this point after two weeks, I don’t think it’s appropriate,” he said.

However, General Perna pointed out a few possible factors. In addition to the delays in coverage, the holiday season and winter weather have delayed recording. Hospitals and other institutions that administer the vaccines are still learning how to store the cans in very cold temperatures and how to administer them properly. And the states have set aside many doses to be dispensed to their long-term care facilities. This initiative is currently in preparation and is expected to take several months.

So far, most of the vaccines given have been dispensed in hospitals, clinics and nursing homes. Dr. Slaoui and General Perna both said they expected the pace of rollout to accelerate significantly once pharmacies start offering vaccines in their stores.

The federal government has agreements with a number of pharmacy chains – including Costco, Walmart and CVS – to dispense vaccines in their stores and other locations as soon as vaccines become more widely available. To date, 40,000 pharmacy locations have signed up for this program, General Perna said.

“What we should look at is the rate of acceleration over the coming weeks,” said Dr. Slaoui, “and I hope it’s going in the right direction.”

Categories
Politics

Trump loyalist Michael Pack blasted by Radio Free Europe leaders

Michael Pack

Source: U.S. Senate

Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty leaders blew up the Trump-appointed CEO of the US Federal Media Agency.

In a letter received from CNBC, those in charge of the network criticized Michael Pack, the head of the US agency for global media. Radio-Free Europe / Radio Liberty is considered a non-federal broadcasting network, but is affiliated with the USAGM.

He has disrupted the ranks of the agency and the leadership of its networks, placing other loyalists to President Donald Trump in key roles.

The letter contains criticism of the board members of Pack, who later approved Ted Lipien as CEO of Radio Free Europe.

“Despite many years of practice, you have appointed a body of inexperienced partisans who have neither industry nor regional expertise – a body that you yourself have described as a placeholder body and that you apparently want to consolidate for two or more years.” The letter reads.

“They used this forum to round-up Ted Lipien, an untested, untested candidate with a history of often one-page writing about RFE / RL and other US international broadcasters,” it said.

The Associated Press reported that Lipien, a former Voice of America official, recently published a blog post promoting the views of employees who object to what they call alleged liberal bias and a lack of conservative views view their programming. Voice of America falls under USAGM’s purview.

The letter was signed by members of the news and editorial team of Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, including the editor-in-chief and the heads of digital strategy. The letter is dated Wednesday and was also sent to congressional officials such as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

Pack pushed the letter back to CNBC in a statement.

“Mrs. Sindelar’s letter is full of inaccuracies. There have been no attempts to compromise it [networks’] Freedom from political influence. “On the contrary, all of the actions I have taken were based on my congressional responsibility and commitment to fulfilling the USAGM’s mission,” said Pack.

The letter notes that Pack is unlikely to keep his job after President-elect Joe Biden is sworn in. Still, the letter suggests that the editorial managers believe that Pack is still bringing in new leaders anyway.

“We consider these measures an eleventh hour to secure RFE / RL for a single US political party at a time when your tenure as CEO of US Outbound Broadcasting is likely to end with the transition between administrations in Washington.” The news leaders wrote.

Pack, who has been at the helm of USAGM since June, has been criticized after repeated purges of longstanding executives in various networks of the agency.

Shortly after approval by the U.S. Senate, Pack ousted agency heads and board members to appoint those directly linked to Trump.

USAGM and Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty representatives have not returned requests for comment.

Categories
Politics

‘No Reasonable Path’ for Fast Vote on $2,000 Stimulus Checks, McConnell Says

WASHINGTON – Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Senator has effectively dashed any chance that Congress would raise stimulus checks to $ 2,000 before President Trump leaves office. He said there was “no realistic way” for the Senate to pass such a law on its own.

Mr McConnell on Wednesday insisted that lawmakers would only consider one bill that would include the $ 2,000 checks on two other issues Mr Trump has asked Congress to do: investigate the integrity of the 2020 election and remove legal protections for social media platforms. Both are no beginners to Democrats, which will ruin any chance of such a law being passed.

In his opening speech, McConnell defiantly accused the Democrats of trying to push more money out the door. “The Senate is not bullied into throwing more borrowed money into the hands of the Democrats’ rich friends who don’t need the help,” he said.

That seemed to ignore the fact that Mr Trump was the one asking lawmakers to increase stimulus checks from $ 600 to $ 2,000 and criticizing his own party for not moving fast enough to provide more money .

“Unless the Republicans have a death wish, and if it is correct, they must approve the $ 2000 payments as soon as possible. $ 600 is not enough! “The president wrote on Twitter on Tuesday.

With four days left in the legislature, the tough stance effectively guarantees that despite growing demands from Republican lawmakers to put more money in the hands of Americans, Mr. Trump will not receive any of his last-minute demands.

For days, Mr Trump held a bipartisan $ 900 billion hostage who said she did not write enough checks and refused to sign them. He finally gave in on Sunday, saying he had signed up by lawmakers to increase payments and address two other issues that upset him: his loss in the 2020 elections and legal protections for big tech companies like Facebook and Twitter, the provided by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

“The Senate will initiate the process for a vote that will increase checks to $ 2,000, revoke Section 230 and initiate an investigation into electoral fraud,” Trump said in a statement on Sunday, reiterating his unsubstantiated allegation of fraud 2020 elections.

Mr McConnell insisted that the President wanted these demands to be taken into account at the same time and accused the Democrats of “trying to make a quick request to the President”.

“The Senate is not going to split up the three issues that President Trump has linked just because Democrats are afraid to address two of them,” McConnell said.

“They hope everyone just forgets about electoral integrity and great technology,” he said. “You absolutely want to ignore these two parts of President Trump’s request.”

However, Mr Trump continued to press for swift action to increase controls.

“$ 2000 ASAP!” he wrote on Twitter on Wednesday.

While millions of Americans remain unemployed, many economists say that increasing the checks from $ 600 to $ 2,000 would most likely have a negligible impact on economic recovery, as a significant portion of those who receive payments are likely to save the funds and will not output. The stimulus payments are based on income level and not on employment status. The Democrats had been pushing for an additional $ 600 a week for unemployment benefits as that money would go directly to those out of work, but the Republicans denied that request, saying it would discourage people from looking for work.

Updated

Apr. 30, 2020 at 8:31 am ET

On Monday, the House approved a bill increasing checks to $ 2,000, and Senate Democrats called on Mr. McConnell to allow a similar vote. After Mr McConnell finished his presentation on Wednesday, Senator Chuck Schumer of New York, the leader of the minority, tried again to immediately vote on the House bill, arguing that there were only a few days left in the legislature and the House session be. “There’s no other game in town.”

“At least the Senate deserves the opportunity to vote up or down,” said Mr Schumer, calling Mr Trump “our unlikely ally.” Mr McConnell again blocked his request as he did on Tuesday.

Mr Schumer and other Democrats warned that they would not support efforts to unite Mr Trump’s three demands into one law.

The bill that Mr. McConnell was putting together would create a bipartisan commission to examine electoral practices that “empower” and “undermine the integrity of the election,” such as the use of postal ballot papers and voting procedures that Mr. McConnell uses. Trump has made unfounded complaints about encouraged election fraud. It would also repeal Section 230, a legal shield that prevents social media companies from being sued for much of the content users post on their platforms.

The second stimulus

Answers to your questions about the stimulus calculation

Updated December 30, 2020

The Economic Aid Package will issue payments of $ 600 and provide federal unemployment benefits of $ 300 for a minimum of 10 weeks. Find out more about the measure and what’s in it for you. For more information on how to get help, please visit our hub.

    • Do I get another incentive payment? Individual adults with adjusted gross income on their 2019 tax return of up to $ 75,000 per year will receive a payment of $ 600, and a couple (or someone whose spouse died in 2020) who earns up to $ 150,000 per year receives twice this amount. There is also a payment of $ 600 for each child for families who meet these income requirements. Individuals filing taxes with head of household status and earning up to $ 112,500 will also receive $ 600 plus the additional amount for children. People with incomes just above this level will receive a partial payment that decreases by $ 5 for every $ 100 of income.
    • When could my payment arrive? The finance department said on December 29 that it had started making direct deposits and would be mailing checks the next day. However, it will take a while for everyone to receive their money.
    • Does the agreement concern unemployment insurance? Legislators agreed to extend the length of time people can receive unemployment benefits and restart an additional federal benefit that is on top of the usual state benefits. But instead of $ 600 a week it would be $ 300. That will last until March 14th.
    • I am behind on my rent or expect to be soon. Do I get relief? The deal calls for $ 25 billion to be distributed by state and local governments to help backward tenants. In order to receive support, households must meet various conditions: the household income (for 2020) must not exceed 80 percent of the area median income; At least one household member must be at risk of homelessness or residential instability. and individuals must be eligible for unemployment benefits or face direct or indirect financial difficulties due to the pandemic. The agreement states that priority will be given to support for lower-income families who have been unemployed for three months or more.

Mr Trump attacked Section 230 for months, arguing with no evidence that the law allows websites to censor conservative views.

Mr. McConnell’s decision to prevent a vote on larger checks is likely to spark the problem in two tight trick-taking competitions in Georgia that will determine control of the Senate.

Both Republicans – Senators Kelly Loeffler and David Perdue – who were trying to keep their seats, on Tuesday approved the larger controls in line with demands from their Democratic challengers, who labeled the $ 600 meager, and phrased the decision as an attempt to support the president. Within minutes of Mr. McConnell’s remarks, the Senate Democrats’ campaign arm attacked Ms. Loeffler and Mr. Perdue, calling their approval of the bill “empty gestures”.

Other Republicans – including Marco Rubio of Florida and Josh Hawley of Missouri – have rallied over larger checks and defied their party’s concerns about increasing the federal budget deficit.

“I’m concerned about the debt, but working families have been badly hurt by the pandemic,” Rubio said in a tweet. “That’s why I’ve supported $ 600 in direct payments to working families. If I get the chance, I’ll vote to increase the amount.”

Even so, despite Mr Trump’s request, the vast majority of Republicans have shown little interest in major economic reviews, arguing that more direct payments should be targeted closely to those in need of the money most.

“I found the combination of the aid we gave to the American people, much more than just a direct payment of $ 600, about right. It has been targeted, ”Tennessee Republican Senator Lamar Alexander told reporters on Wednesday. “If we want to spend that much money we will prefer to target it.”

Democrats “want to spend the money on people who frankly have not suffered financial losses during the pandemic, and it’s just wasteful,” said Republican Senator John Cornyn of Texas.

Mr Cornyn said he felt the issue of larger checks would be unlikely to move forward, shaking off the question of whether Republicans were concerned about the political setback of denying Mr Trump his request.

“After spending $ 4 trillion?” Mr. Cornyn replied, referring to the previous stimulus packages that Congress passed. “No, not in a normal world.”