Category: Politics

Categories
Politics

Home goals to move $1.9 trillion coronavirus aid in two weeks, Pelosi says

House aims to pass $1.9 trillion coronavirus relief in two weeks, Pelosi says

The House intends to pass coronavirus alleviation law within two weeks as Democrats move forward in the process that will allow them to approve a bailout package without Republican votes, House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi said on Friday.

The Senate passed a budget decision early Friday after a marathon of votes on dozen of amendments. The House followed an almost partisan vote that afternoon and launched the process of reconciliation that would allow President Joe Biden’s $ 1.9 trillion bailout to get through the Democratic Senate by a simple majority.

“On Monday we will start working on the details of the bill,” Pelosi told reporters after meeting with the Chairs of the Biden Committee and the Democratic House in the White House. House Majority Whip James Clyburn, DS.C., said he will have the votes to pass despite some concerns within the party about his costs.

Vice President Kamala Harris attends a swearing-in ceremony with Sens. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt. And Alex Padilla, D-Calif. In the Old Senate Chamber in the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC, USA, on Feb. 4 2021.

Greg Nash | Reuters

The Democrats passed budget resolution 51-50 in the evenly split Senate when Vice President Kamala Harris cast her first casting vote. The vote on the party line after around 15 hours of examining politically sensitive amendments underscores the divide in Congress over the structure of the next aid package.

“I am so grateful that our caucus stayed together in unity,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, DN.Y., after the vote. “We had no choice given the problems America is facing and the desire to move forward. And we have moved forward.”

He claimed “this was a bipartisan activity” as the chamber had accepted several amendments from senators from both parties.

While President Joe Biden said he hoped to win Republican support for the relief plan, Democrats have begun creating the framework to get the proposal passed as soon as possible without GOP support. Without reconciliation, the Democrats would have to win over 10 Republicans in a 50:50 split in the Senate.

After new data showed the US created just 49,000 jobs in January, Biden said he wanted to work with Republicans but the party was “just not ready to go as far as I think we have to go”. He said he had an “easy choice” between passing a bill with Democrats now or “being stuck in lengthy negotiations.”

President Joe Biden speaks with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) during a meeting with Democratic leaders and Chairs of House committees dealing with Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Legislation at February 5, 2021 in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington.

Kevin Lemarque | Reuters

The budget resolution instructs the committees to pass legislation mirroring Biden’s Covid bailout package while falling below the $ 1.9 trillion target. Among other things, Democrats want to adopt:

  • $ 1,400 direct payments
  • Unemployment benefit of $ 400 per week through September
  • $ 350 billion for state, local, and tribal government
  • A national Covid vaccination program worth $ 20 billion
  • $ 50 billion for virus testing
  • $ 170 billion for K-12 schools and higher education institutions
  • A $ 30 billion rental and utility fund

Some Democrats, like Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who may himself sink a bill in the Senate, have raised concerns about the scope of the proposal and called for more restrictions on receiving the $ 1,400 checks. While Biden said he would support limiting deposits to lower income levels, “I’m not reducing the size of the checks.”

Several amendments were passed during the Senate vote, although many were vague and it was not clear how they would affect the final legislation. They included a measure to prevent high-income people from receiving stimulus checks, one to set up a restaurant grant program, and one to ban tax increases for small businesses during the pandemic.

An additional amendment that was passed aims to prohibit undocumented immigrants from receiving direct payments. A separate measure that failed and targeted New York without naming it would have limited funding to states under investigation for inadequate reporting of coronavirus deaths in nursing homes.

Democrats have said they couldn’t afford to wait for law to pass if talks with Republicans over a bipartisan plan fail to bring about a breakthrough. You said it would take nearly $ 2 trillion in spending to both contain the pandemic and prevent future economic problems.

Republicans offered Biden a $ 618 billion counter-proposal, arguing that Congress could cap additional spending after passing a $ 900 billion relief bill in December. A group of GOP lawmakers who met with Biden on Monday sent him a letter Thursday questioning the amount of school funding in his plan and commending him for considering raising the income cap for stimulus Lower checks.

In the meantime, some lawmakers have urged the White House to break its plan down into smaller pieces to ensure bipartisan support for parts of it. The House Problem Solvers Caucus, made up of 56 members from both parties, called on Friday for a swift vote on a $ 160 billion bill related to vaccine distribution.

The Biden government has announced that it will not split the aid laws.

Democrats hope to have a bailout package through March 14 when a $ 300-a-week unemployment allowance approved in December expires. Over the summer, Congress missed a deadline to extend a $ 600 per week unemployment benefit passed in March, adding to the financial pain and hunger felt across the country in the months that followed.

After the White House meeting, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Cited last year’s belated reaction as a reason not to wait now.

“We waited a long time and a lot of people were injured,” he said.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Categories
Politics

Goats Don’t Vote – The New York Instances

Goats Don’t Vote - The New York Times

In a moment, a herd of goats romps about and casually rummages in the shaggy grass. The next time her long ears twitch and her large golden eyes stare as they purposefully run away. They pick up speed while seemingly attentive to a specific destination. They exhibit behavior that scientists have long observed in herding, herding, and training animals from baboons to fish.

It almost looks as if the goats have cast their votes and decided together which way to go.

How creatures in the animal kingdom come together to a decision is a subject of constant interest. In some species, individuals weigh themselves. Meerkat troop members call and African wild dogs sneeze before the group moves and they will not leave until enough individuals have spoken.

It has even been suggested that African buffaloes vote in concert with their movements, with animals pointing out the path they want to go and the herd choosing the intersection of all their directions.

However, it is difficult for a human observer to tell the difference between forays through silent voting and those in which animals copy whatever their closest compatriots do, as school fish do. With collars fitted with GPS and other sensors, biologists observed a small herd of Namibian goats to see if their behavior suggested one tactic or another. In an article published Wednesday in the Royal Society Open Science magazine, they report that the goats don’t seem to be voting.

If animals decide in advance which route to take, there should be a delay in when the majority will orient themselves in the direction of travel and when to head out, said Andrew King, who studies animal behavior at Swansea University in Wales and the author is the new paper. However, it can be difficult for researchers to pinpoint the crucial moments.

“If you were just sitting in the field with a notebook, you couldn’t do it because you didn’t know when to go,” he said.

Recognition…Lisa O’Bryan

He and his colleagues have developed collars that contain GPS devices as well as accelerometers and magnetometers that track which direction animals are moving, when they are moving together, and where they will eventually land. They put the collars on 16 domesticated goats in the Tsaobis Nature Park in Namibia and collected data while traveling for 10 days. With this information, they could trace back to just before the group left a certain location and determine when they turned towards their destination.

If there were to be a vote, the goats would orientate themselves before starting the movement. A majority could face the direction they are ultimately moving, or the direction could be an average of their positions. In any situation, there would be a delay before the goats responded to the decision.

Instead, the researchers saw that the goats did not face their destination until the moment they left. That meant that a goat would start moving, its closest neighbors would turn to follow, and their closest neighbors would do the same, behavior the researchers call copying. This meant that the orientation of the goats before a foray did not predict which direction they were going.

The researchers also built a computer model to simulate what the movement of the goats would look like if they were to vote or just copy. Some virtual herds of goats were programmed to copy their neighbors, while others voted with their positions. The researchers found that what the goats did in real life looked a lot more like the copycat herds, suggesting that the animals didn’t have to do anything other than mimic their companions to move around as a group.

Behavior that stems from very simple rules can be surprisingly complex. Goats may not have discussions – at least not what scientists saw in this study – but that doesn’t mean their way of moving together isn’t flexible or useful. If more research confirms that copying makes them move, it could suggest that mimicking neighbors can improve herd survival.

Dr. King said that if many unrelated species use this decision-making process instead of voting, “it likely means that it is a useful, adaptable method for making collective decisions.”

Categories
Politics

Home votes to drop Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from committee roles

House votes to drop Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene from committee roles

The House voted Thursday to strip Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., From her committee duties as punishment for a laundry list of extreme views and conspiracy theories she advocated prior to taking office.

The vote was held by a margin of 230-199, with 11 Republican members on the side of the Democratic majority. No Democrats voted against the resolution.

The eleven Republicans who voted to remove Greene include: Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick (PA), Rep. Chris Jacobs (NY), Rep. Carlos A. Giménez (FL), Rep. John Katko (NY), Rep. Young Kim (CA.), Rep. Adam Kinzinger (IL), Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (NY), Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (FL), Rep. Fred Upton (MI), Rep. Mario Díaz-Balart and Rep. Chris Smith (NJ) .

It was only hours after Greene stepped on the chamber floor to express regret over some of the marginal views she had spread, including the pro-Trump-QAnon conspiracy. She didn’t offer an apology.

Kevin McCarthy, Chairman of the Minority House, R-Calif., Had hoped to avoid the vote, which forced Republicans to give an opinion on the resolution aimed at condemning Greene’s behavior.

While few, if any, GOP members had openly defended Greene’s most controversial remarks – such as alleged support for the execution of top Democrats – some Republicans had argued against the trial, warning that the Democrats’ efforts to get Greene up would set a dangerous precedent. Other Republicans chose to attack Democrats for refusing to reprimand their own members for making fire testimonies in the past.

However, the Democrats claimed that Greene would be placed in a separate category because of her behavior and that she should be removed from the Budgets Committee and the Education and Labor Committee.

“If a person is encouraged to talk about shooting a member in the head, they should lose the right to serve on a committee,” said executive chairman Jim McGovern, D-Mass., On Wednesday before his committee approved the resolution to dismiss Greene from the committees.

“If this isn’t the bottom line, I don’t know where the hell the bottom line is,” said McGovern.

Greene had promoted a litany of other radical conspiracies and extreme statements prior to his election. She was reportedly skeptical of the conspiracy theory that a plane failed to hit the Pentagon on September 11, 2001. She reportedly suggested that some school shootings had occurred and mocked a survivor of the school massacre in Parkland, Florida. Media also reported that Greene suspected in 2018 that forest fires in California might have been caused by laser beams.

McCarthy spoke to Greene in a closed meeting Tuesday night. He then suggested to the Democrats that the GOP Greene would withdraw its duties as the education committee if it could remain on the budget committee, NBC News reported. Democrats turned down this offer.

“To do nothing would be a renunciation of our moral responsibility to our colleagues, the house, our values, the truth and our country,” said the majority leader of the house, Steny Hoyer, D-Md., Before the final vote on Thursday evening.

“Yesterday the Republican Conference decided not to do anything. So today the House has to do something,” said Hoyer.

Greene claims she recently spoke to Trump and has his support. Trump, who lost his race to President Joe Biden but never officially admitted it, retains overwhelming Republican support even after his supporters’ uprising in the U.S. Capitol, in which five people died.

But other prominent Republicans have been less supportive of Greene. Earlier this week, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Blew Greene’s “crazy lies and conspiracy theories” and called them “cancer for the Republican Party and our country.”

McCarthy said in a statement Wednesday afternoon that he “unequivocally” condemned Greene’s many controversial remarks on “school shootings, political violence and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories”.

He criticized the Democrats for sanctioning Greene and accused the majority party of a party political seizure of power.

McCarthy said he told Greene during a meeting Tuesday night that “as members of Congress, we have a responsibility to adhere to a higher standard”.

“Marjorie recognized that in our conversation. I keep her word,” said McCarthy in his statement.

Democrats, meanwhile, seem eager to showcase Greene as the GOP’s figurehead.

McCarthy has decided to make the House Republicans the “party of conspiracy theories and QAnon,” Pelosi said in a statement Wednesday, “and Rep. Greene is in the driver’s seat.”

“I remain deeply concerned about the acceptance of extreme conspiracy theorists by the Republican government,” Pelosi said at a press conference Thursday.

“Particularly troubling is their willingness to reward a QAnon supporter, a 9/11 Truther, a molester of school shootout survivors, for giving them valued committee positions, including – who could imagine them?” Person would join the education committee? “”

Categories
Politics

Home Exiles Marjorie Taylor Greene From Panels, as Republicans Rally Round Her

House Exiles Marjorie Taylor Greene From Panels, as Republicans Rally Around Her

Even so, the episode sparked deep divisions among Republicans over how to move forward as a party. In the days leading up to the vote on Ms. Greene, Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell, the most powerful Republican in Washington, denounced what he called “crazy lies” and claimed that such conspiracy theories were a “cancer” in the world party. Several other senior Republican senators had joined him in denouncing Ms. Greene and saying she could not become the face of the party.

To warn Democrats about the move, House Republicans tabled their own proposal to remove Minnesota Democrat Ilhan Omar from the foreign affairs committee. She cited comments, including that Israel “hypnotized” the world for their “evil deeds.” “Ms. Omar publicly apologized for these comments, which were charged with anti-Semitism.

“If this is the new standard, I look forward to continuing the standard,” McCarthy said, adding that Republicans have a “long list” of Democrats to remove from their committees.

On Wednesday, after Democrats announced they would reprimand Ms. Greene, Mr McCarthy made a long, tortured statement condemning her comments, saying they had no place among Republicans in the House but argued that they did didn’t deserve to be punished for you. Moving on Wednesday night after the controversial, hour-long Republican meeting, he told reporters that Ms. Greene had privately apologized for her earlier remarks and suggested that it was time to move on.

“She said she knew nothing about lasers or all the different things that were raised about her,” McCarthy said, apparently referring to a Facebook post Ms. Greene wrote in 2018 that indicated devastating wildfires were happening in California a space lasers controlled by a prominent Jewish banking family with ties to powerful democrats.

“Now if we are to judge what other members have said before they are members of Congress, I think it will be difficult for Democrats to get someone on the committee,” he added.

According to Eleanor Neff Powell, professor of political science at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, dismissal from committees is usually reserved for lawmakers on trial, criminal investigation, or otherwise in particularly outrageous ways with their party.

Categories
Politics

Lindsey Graham, Dick Durbin unveil newest immigration reform invoice

Lindsey Graham, Dick Durbin unveil latest immigration reform bill

Protesters hold illuminated signs during a rally supporting the DACA or the Dream Act outside the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC on January 18, 2018.

Zach Gibson | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Sens. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., And Lindsey Graham, RS.C., unveiled the latest version of the Dream Act Thursday, which is part of a new push to reform immigration.

The proposed legislation, first introduced in 2001, would give some young undocumented immigrants brought to the United States as children the opportunity to pursue an avenue of American citizenship.

The reintroduction comes as President Joe Biden begins rolling out his immigration reform agenda, aiming to reverse many of President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.

In 2012, President Barack Obama created the Deferred Action on the Arrivals of Children program after the Dream Bill was not passed in Congress on several occasions.

DACA protects young undocumented immigrants who would be affected by the dream law from deportation. Politics does not offer a route to citizenship.

Trump tried to end the DACA during his presidency, but the Supreme Court blocked his administration’s attempt in June. On January 20, Biden signed an ordinance to maintain the DACA.

“It is clear that only laws passed by Congress can give dreamers the chance to earn their way to American citizenship,” Durbin said in a statement Thursday.

The Dream Act would give some young undocumented immigrants legal permanent residence and eventually American citizenship if they meet certain criteria, including completing high school or earning a GED. Higher education, work or military service, and passing background checks.

The 2021 Dream Act is identical to the versions Durbin and Graham introduced in the last two sessions of Congress, the Senators say.

Graham said in a statement Thursday that he would like to pass the Dream Bill as part of a comprehensive immigration package rather than as a standalone bill.

“I believe it will be a starting point for us to find bipartisan breakthroughs that will bring relief to dreamers and also fix a broken immigration system,” said Graham.

In the last 15 years, Congress has not passed a comprehensive immigration law.

According to a survey by the June Pew Research Center, about three-quarters of Americans support the granting of permanent legal status to undocumented immigrants who came to the United States as children.

Categories
Politics

Smartmatic Information $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Towards Fox Information

Smartmatic Files $2.7 Billion Lawsuit Against Fox News

Smartmatic said in the complaint that promoting false claims against Fox “put its” multi-billion dollar business pipeline “at risk; damaged its options technology and software business; and made it difficult for the company to do new business in the United States, where it had made headway after years of running elections in other countries.

Fox declined to comment before seeing the suit. Ms. Bartiromo, Mr. Dobbs, Ms. Pirro, Mr. Giuliani and Ms. Powell did not immediately respond to the request for comments.

In his head-on assault on Mr. Murdoch’s media empire, Smartmatic argues that Fox portrayed it as the villain in a fictional narrative designed to help win back Newsmax and OANN viewers. In the weeks following the election, ratings soared on the assumption that Mr Biden was not the rightful winner. Smartmatic’s lawsuit also argues that Mr. Giuliani and Ms. Powell tried to enrich themselves and improve their standing with Mr. Trump’s supporters by making allegations that harm the company.

The Fox Corporation with around 9,000 employees is managed by Mr. Murdoch (89) and his older son Lachlan, its managing director. $ 2.7 billion would be a heavy penalty for the company. Fox Corporation posted pre-tax profits of $ 3 billion on sales of $ 12.3 billion from September 2019 to September last year. The value is around 17.8 billion US dollars.

Smartmatic’s complaint takes into account not only the reputational and financial damage the company has sustained, but also the damage the US has suffered from the claims of Mr. Trump’s allies and the Murdoch-controlled networks he has long favored have done.

Mr. Dobbs, a presenter for the Fox Business Network, and Ms. Bartiromo, who hosts shows on Fox Business and Fox News, were staunch supporters of the former president. On November 29, Ms. Bartiromo conducted Mr. Trump’s first long television interview since the election. Ms. Pirro, a former prosecutor whose “Justice with Judge Jeanine” is an integral part of the Saturday night cast of Fox New, has been friends with Mr. Trump for decades.

Among the on-air exchanges, the highlights of the Smartmatic suit are one between Ms. Powell and Mr. Dobbs on November 16. Ms. Powell claimed on Mr. Dobbs’ show that Hugo Chávez, the late President of Venezuela, was involved in the creation of Smartmatic technology, which is designed so that the voices she is processing can be changed undetected. (Mr. Chávez, who died in 2013, had nothing to do with Smartmatic.)

Categories
Politics

Cracking down on China’s shady shell corporations

Cracking down on China's shady shell companies

A Chinese policeman guards a giant portrait of the late Chairman Mao Zedong at Tiananmen Gate in Tiananmen Square in Beijing, China.

Getty Images

When you think of anonymous shell companies, you might think of illegal activities by shady criminal groups, or tax evaders trying to hide their money, or crooked foreign officials trying to defraud the population.

But there is one other thing to keep in mind: the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

While it hasn’t received nearly as much attention as some other topics related to the Chinese government, anonymous shell companies have proven to be a key component in the country’s recent rise.

More importantly, these shell companies preventing investigators from successfully tracking financial flows have proven to be key tools for both the CCP’s corrupt and heightened influence in the country and its expansive overseas efforts, all of which are aimed at this increasing the influence of the People’s Republic of China and eroding American power and American interests.

Take a look at Beijing’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), for example. While the CCP spins the initiative as mere economic expansion and global integration, further investigation reveals far more suspicious and far more corrupt deals – often with anonymous Shell companies at their core.

From Southeast Asia to Africa to Europe, the BRI has relied on anonymous Shell companies to hide payments to corrupt officials overseas and smear their palms to sign love agreements with representatives of the PRC and state-affiliated companies.

These shell companies, which prevent investigators from successfully tracking financial flows, have proven to be key tools both in the corrupt and heightened influence of the Chinese Communist Party in the country and in its expansive efforts abroad.

According to a report by the Hudson Institute’s Kleptocracy Initiative, the Belt and Road Initiative has “loaded the kleptocracy in developing countries with bribes and unprecedented embezzlement opportunities” – much of it relied on anonymous Shell companies, which are both journalists and anti-corruption activists blocked from exposing the details of crooked deals.

Not only has the BRI further undercut American efforts elsewhere, but the CCP has relied on anonymous Shell companies to prop up the rogue regime in North Korea. As recently as this year, the Justice Department charged dozens of people with laundering billions of dollars through anonymous corporations to help develop North Korea’s nuclear program.

Or look at the role anonymous Shell companies are playing in the CCP’s domestic stranglehold. Like other corrupt authoritarian powers in countries like Russia and Iran, the CCP often seems more interested in looting its people than in providing things like basic freedoms.

Most of the time, anonymous shell companies are at the center of these corrupt, oligarchic schemes. To take just one example, the Panama Papers revealed global transplant operations that were hidden behind anonymous Shell companies. Around 40,000 anonymous shells were directly linked to politically influential Chinese nationals, including Chinese President’s brother-in-law Xi Jinping.

The revelations also pulled the curtain back on a number of other CCP majors, all of whom are hiding their looted millions behind anonymous Shell companies.

Even the CCP’s biggest human rights violations rely on anonymous Shell companies. In Xinjiang, where the CCP set up the largest concentration camp system in the world since World War II and where the CCP forcibly detained millions of Uyghurs and Kazakhs for their ethnicity, Beijing has relied on anonymous shell companies to hide their funding.

A paramilitary organization set up by the CCP in Xinjiang relied on hundreds of thousands of anonymous Shell companies to cover up how Beijing is funding its massive crimes.

Easier than getting a library card

Shell anonymous companies are clearly key to the CCP’s designs. But in all of these details and the way China uses and abuses anonymous shell companies, there is an unfortunate reality.

The largest provider of anonymous shell companies is not in Beijing or other traditional offshore ports. Right here in the US, getting an anonymous shell company is often easier than getting a library card – and the Chinese government has turned over and over again for many of their anonymous needs.

Fortunately, the US is finally on the verge of eliminating this scourge. The National Defense Authorization Act of 2021, which went into effect January 1, 2021, contained our legislation – the ILLICIT CASH Act – effectively banning anonymous shell companies once and for all. The move will not only be the largest anti-corruption reform in the US in decades, it will also eliminate one of the world’s most popular tools for the criminals and corrupt.

Needless to say, there are many reasons to celebrate the passing of our laws. It will finally end one of the favorite tools used by cartels trying to hide their profits and oligarchs hiding their plundered wealth from battered populations. And it will include critical reforms of the anti-money laundering tools in our country that will bring our anti-money laundering laws into the 21st century.

It will also exemplify American unity and strength, thanks to its strong support from both parties. And perhaps most importantly, the Chinese Communist Party leaders who bribe officials overseas are building concentration camps at home and undermining American interests wherever they get a chance.

Sens. Mark R. Warner, D-VA and Mike Rounds, R-SD.

Categories
Politics

Mexican Regulation Halts U.S. From Turning Again Some Migrant Households

Mexican Law Halts U.S. From Turning Back Some Migrant Families

WASHINGTON – A Mexican law prevented the United States from quickly turning away immigrant families on one of the busiest stretches of the southwest border and forced agents to resume releasing families into the country, according to three government officials from Biden.

The Trump administration began rejecting migrants entering the US in March, citing the coronavirus threat, and the emergency rule effectively sealed the border from asylum seekers. Due to a law that Mexico passed in November banning the detention of immigrant children and families, the country has stopped accepting such families from South Texas, an area normally prone to illegal crossings.

The recent postponement has alerted Homeland Security officials and poses an immediate challenge to the Biden government. Homeland Security officials said the emergency rule was necessary to prevent the spread of the coronavirus in detention centers along the border, even if it prevented vulnerable families from hearing their asylum applications. In recent weeks, increasing numbers of families have been held in such facilities in the Rio Grande Valley and Del Rio, Texas.

Stephanie Malin, a Customs and Border Protection spokeswoman, said due to pandemic precautions and social distancing guidelines, some facilities have reached full “safe holding capacity”.

“CBP takes the safety and wellbeing of its workforce and those they encounter very seriously and we are taking even more precautions due to Covid-19,” said Ms. Malin. “As always, the number of people crossing the border continues to fluctuate and we are adjusting accordingly.” She said the agency is working with organizations in the community to release migrants into the public domain.

The United States has turned back more than 390,000 migrants to Mexico or their home countries since March. The ruling reduced the number of migrants detained on the U.S. side of the border, but it also put Central American families in trouble when they learned that their children had been taken to Mexico, in violation of international treaties. And while politics was a crucial part of the Trump administration’s attempts to close the border to migrants, the rule also had the unintended effect of giving migrants more chances of illegal entry.

Customs and Border Protection recorded more than 73,000 crossings in December, up from more than 40,000 in July. Agents arrested more than 40,000 migrants in December 2019.

Mexican law, which went into effect in January, doesn’t apply to the entire border. American border officials still reject single adults, and so do families in places like Arizona, officials said. It is unclear how the law will affect other parts of the border.

A State Department spokesman in Mexico declined to comment on whether it had stopped accepting migrant families, saying only that the United States continued to have the pandemic emergency rule.

However, Biden’s administration was unable to return migrant families to Reynosa, Mexico, a change first reported by the Washington Post. The relocation has raised concerns among Customs and Border Protection about a possible increase in family crossings into the neighboring Rio Grande Valley. Border crossings in recent years have been fueled mainly by Central American families fleeing persecution, violence and poverty.

The Department of Homeland Security is currently building a tent complex in Donna, Texas to house migrants. However, an administrative official said this was not related to the law in Mexico. Customs and Border Guard said in November it would close the main McAllen detention center for renovations.

President Biden campaigned for asylum restoration on the southwestern border and this week signed an executive order directing the government to roll back President Donald J. Trump’s restrictive policies.

The new government has not publicly announced when the pandemic emergency rule will be lifted. After a federal judge in the District of Columbia lifted a blockade on the rule that prevented the United States from turning away unaccompanied migrant children, the White House said it would use its own discretion to decide when to apply the policy.

Mr Biden said in December that his administration would take a cautious approach to reversing Trump-era policies to avoid a surge on the border.

His immigration plan was to rely more on programs that migrants follow after their release to the United States to ensure they appear before immigration tribunals, rather than on their detention.

Mexico, for its part, praised the fact that it had imposed restrictions on those detained.

“Mexico is taking a crucial step towards ending child detention and we are encouraged by this promising development,” said Gillian Triggs, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

While top Trump administration officials argued their emergency rule was just an attempt to prevent the spread of the coronavirus, Mr Trump’s White House attempted to use the policy to advance its goals of curbing illegal immigration.

Kirk Semple contributed to coverage from Mexico City.

Categories
Politics

Home to vote Thursday to strip Marjorie Taylor Greene of committee roles, Hoyer says

House to vote Thursday to strip Marjorie Taylor Greene of committee roles, Hoyer says

Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA) yells at journalists as she goes through security outside the Chamber of the House on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC on January 12, 2021.

Andrew Cabellero-Reynolds | AFP | Getty Images

The House will vote on Thursday on a resolution to deprive MP Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., Of her committee duties, Majority Leader Steny Hoyer said.

The move comes amid resounding criticism of Greene for a series of extreme remarks she made prior to winning her Congress seat and increasing pressure on Republican leaders to reprimand or condemn these comments.

The resolution ousting Greene from the Committee on Budgets and the Committee on Education and Labor was passed in the House Rules Committee on Wednesday afternoon.

Hoyer, D-Md., Said in a statement on Wednesday that the resolution will be voted on Thursday on the floor of the house.

“It is clear that there is no alternative to holding a vote on the decision to remove Rep. Greene from her committee duties,” Hoyer said, noting that he was speaking with Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., About Greene had spoken.

McCarthy had suggested to Hoyer that Republicans remove Greene from the education committee if she could stick to her budget committee mandate, a source knowledgeable told NBC News. Hoyer turned down this deal, which would have avoided a vote on the floor of the house.

Greene’s assignment to the Education Committee has proven more controversial amid reports that she mocked a survivor of the school shooting, suggesting that other shootings were jokes.

McCarthy met Greene in his Capitol office Tuesday night. After this discussion, he made no immediate comment.

But in a statement later Wednesday, McCarthy said he “unequivocally” condemns Greene’s many controversial remarks about “school shootings, political violence and anti-Semitic conspiracy theories”.

The Republican leader said he made it clear to Greene during their meeting that “it is our responsibility, as members of Congress, to keep ourselves to a higher standard” and that “her previous comments now have a much greater significance”.

“Marjorie recognized that in our conversation. I keep her word,” said McCarthy in his statement.

But Greene did not publicly apologize for her earlier remarks, only declaring on Wednesday that “we owe them no apology” and “we will never step down,” citing criticism from Democrats and the media.

McCarthy’s testimony stated that his offer to Hoyer was intended as a “way to bring the temperature down and remove those concerns” regarding Greene. But “Democrats are choosing to raise the temperature by taking the unprecedented move to fuel their partisan takeover of the other party’s committee duties,” McCarthy said.

Greene, who won her House seat after running unopposed in Georgia’s 14th Congressional District, has long received extensive scrutiny and conviction for promoting an extensive list of conspiracy theories.

Greene has a history of support for the baseless QAnon conspiracy that alleges that former President Donald Trump was embroiled in a secret battle against a cabal of “deep state” political and media criminals. She also recently came under fire after a CNN report revealed she liked multiple comments on Facebook calling for the execution of prominent Democrats, including House spokeswoman Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Media also reported that Greene suspected in 2018 that forest fires in California might have been caused by laser beams.

At a House Rules Committee hearing on Wednesday, Chairman Jim McGovern, D-Mass., Tore up the “really sick stuff” Greene said.

“If a person is encouraged to talk about shooting a member in the head, they should lose the right to serve on a committee,” McGovern said. “If that’s not the bottom line, I don’t know where the hell the bottom line is.”

McCarthy “is unwilling or unable to do the right thing,” added McGovern.

McGovern also expressed hope that the regulatory body could come to a bipartisan agreement on the resolution.

“It’s not about turning down someone with a different political belief, it’s about accountability,” said McGovern. “This is not a debate about a difference in politics or even ideology. It is about what she said.”

Oklahoma Rep. Tom Cole, the top Republican member of the committee, said at the hearing, “I find Congressman Greene’s comments deeply offensive.”

However, he considered the committee’s hearing “premature” and said the ethics committee should review the matter and make recommendations.

“I urge this committee to consider an alternative course of action before it’s too late.”

“I am very concerned about the precedent of another party that chooses to” ditch the duties of a membership committee, “said Cole.

Earlier this week, Senate Minority Chairman Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., Condemned Greene’s “crazy lies and conspiracy theories” calling them “cancer for the Republican Party and our country.”

But many Republicans have remained silent about Greene or withheld judgment about her possible expulsion from the congressional committees.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, RS.C., tweeted earlier Wednesday that Greene’s “alleged comments on various topics” would be “worrying” if they accurately reflected her current views. But “the most important thing for me is to understand what Rep. Greene believes now and in the past,” tweeted Graham, urging her to correct the record “if it needs to be corrected.”

Meanwhile, Greene has attacked the media during the latest wave of harmful stories about her.

“If @SpeakerPelosi were the leader of the minority, she would use every identity ploy in the book to defend her member,” Greene claimed on Twitter on Wednesday. “White, woman, woman, mother, Christian, conservative, business owner […] Those are the reasons why they don’t want me at Ed & Labor. “

She previously warned that if Democrats attempt to excise them from House committees, “I can assure you that the precedent they are setting will be used extensively against members on their side once we regain a majority after the 2022 elections.” “

Some Republicans have already taken steps in this direction. Republican lawmakers tabled an amendment this week to oust Minnesota Democratic MP Ilhan Omar from their committees, accusing them of making anti-Semitic comments.

Omar, one of the first Muslim women to serve in Congress, said in a statement that these efforts are “a desperate smear based on racism, misogyny and Islamophobia”.

“Republicans will do everything possible to distract from the fact that they have not only admitted members of their own caucus but also increased those encouraging violence,” Omar said.

Categories
Politics

Eugenio Martínez, Final of the Watergate Burglars, Dies at 98

Eugenio Martínez, Last of the Watergate Burglars, Dies at 98

They were spearheaded by James W. McCord Jr., a security coordinator for the Nixon campaign, whose confession to the judge shortly before his conviction sparked the White House revelations of crimes and cover-ups that culminated in Nixon’s resignation in 1974, which followed Mr McCord on scandal senior advisor to the president and has been reduced to less than four months’ imprisonment from one to five years.

In 1977, the four Cuba-born burglars each accepted an out-of-court settlement of $ 50,000 from the Nixon campaign. They said they were misled into believing they had acted with state sanction on behalf of a White House administration that was concerned about American security and sympathized with Cuban refugees.

In 1983, after his pardons were denied by Presidents Gerald R. Ford and Jimmy Carter, Mr. Martínez, who was still with the CIA at the time of the Watergate break-in, found himself pardoned by President Ronald Reagan.

The pardon granted because Mr Martínez was considered the least guilty of the defendants restored his right to vote. Despite the ordeal, he was proud of a Watergate souvenir – a golden lucky clover with the words “Good luck Richard Nixon” in Spanish written on it.

Eugenio Rolando Martínez Careaga was born on July 7, 1922 in what is now the Artemisa province in western Cuba. Before Castro’s rise, he was exiled as a critic of the dictator Fulgencio Batista. He later returned to Cuba, but left the country again in 1959 to oppose Castro’s newly established regime.

“My mother and father were not allowed to leave Cuba,” he wrote in a memoir published in Vanity Fair. “It would have been easy for me to get them out. That was my specialty. But my bosses at the company – the CIA – said I could be caught and tortured, and if I talk I could jeopardize other operations. So my mother and father died in Cuba. This is how orders go. I follow the instructions. “

He is survived by three daughters, Alicia Garcia Bernaza, Eneida Lopez and Yolanda Toscano; one son, Danny Martínez; and four grandchildren.