Categories
Health

To Vaccinate Youthful Teenagers, States and Cities Look to Colleges, Camps, Even Seashores

Not all teenagers crave the vaccine. Many hate taking pictures. Others say because young people often get milder cases of Covid, why should they risk a new vaccine?

Patsy Stinchfield, a nurse who oversees vaccination for children in Minnesota, has strong evidence that some cases can be serious in young people. Lately, not only have more children with Covid been hospitalized, but also Covid patients aged 13, 15, 16 and 17 years in the intensive care unit.

The new FDA approval means all of these patients would be eligible for admissions, she noted. “If you can keep your child from going to intensive care with a safe vaccine, why wouldn’t you?” She said.

Mr. Quesnel, the superintendent of East Hartford, Connecticut, said the strongest message of reaching older teenagers would likely appeal to younger ones too. Instead of focusing on the fact that the shot will protect them, they are taking up the idea that this will avoid having to quarantine them if exposed.

“They are not so afraid of the health threats from Covid as they are of the social losses it brings,” he said, adding that 60 percent of his district’s seniors or about 300 college students received their first dose at a mass vaccination website published on April 26th operated by the Community Health Center. “Some of our biggest levers right now are this social component – ‘You will not be quarantined. ‘“

Michael Jackson of North Port, Florida can’t wait for his 14-year-old son Devin to receive the vaccine. Last year, he said, his son’s popular Little League games were suspended and the family had to skip regular Sunday meals with their grandparents. Devin, an eighth grader, had to be quarantined three times after being exposed to Covid.

Categories
Health

What we all know concerning the B.1.617 variant

Health workers with personal protective equipment care for Covid-19 patients in a banquet room that was temporarily converted into a Covid care center in New Delhi on May 7, 2021.

Prakash Singh | AFP | Getty Images

India is grappling with a devastating second wave of coronavirus that is far more deadly than the first – and scientists say the surge could be partly due to mutating strains.

The World Health Organization has just classified the B.1.617 strain, first identified in India, as a “variant of concern” – indicating that the variant has the “highest public health impact”.

India is the second most severely affected country in the world, reporting more than 22.66 million infections and more than 246,000 deaths to date, according to data from the Indian Ministry of Health. Experts say the numbers are likely severely underreported as many never make it to the hospitals running out of beds and oxygen.

What do we know?

The earliest samples of the B.1.617 were discovered in India in October, and authorities announced in March this year that the variant had become more common in Maharashtra state.

The World Health Organization said Monday that it classifies the exposure as a “worrying variant”. It was previously referred to as a “variant of interest” which represents a lower level of alert.

Dr. Maria Van Kerkhove, technical director of Covid-19 at WHO, said there was information suggesting that B.1.617 “increased portability” and “slightly decreased neutralization”.

Variants of concern are more contagious, cause more serious illness, or reduce the effectiveness of public health measures, vaccines or drugs, according to the UN Health Agency.

“We have no evidence that our diagnostics, our therapeutics and our vaccines are not working,” she said at a press conference on Monday.

Other variants of concern are the B.1.1.7, which was first identified in the UK, and the B.1.351, which was discovered in South Africa.

According to the WHO, the threshold value for determining an interesting variant is relatively low compared to the classification of a questionable variant.

According to Gisaid, a platform that allows countries to share data about viruses, the B.1.617 strain from India has been detected in about 40 countries, including the US, UK and Singapore.

Did it trigger India’s second wave?

There are several factors that have led to a sharp increase in Indian Covid-19 cases – and mutating variants are just one of them.

The WHO said that several variants circulating in India have increased transmittability, but B.1.617 has a higher growth rate.

We’ve turned our backs on the virus, but the virus hasn’t turned our backs on us. And now we’re paying the price.

K Srinath Reddy

President of the Public Health Foundation of India

B.1.617 has three sublines, each with slightly different mutations, according to the WHO. When the cases in India experienced a “big boom”, the lineages B.1.617.1 and B.1.617.2 became more common, according to the health department.

The variant has sometimes been referred to as a “double mutant” because it contains two mutations – E484Q and L452R – that make the virus more contagious and better bypass the body’s defenses. A third mutation in the variant, the P681R, can potentially lead to “increased transmission,” the WHO said.

Virologists speaking to CNBC said the terms “double mutation” or “triple mutation” are scientifically incorrect because B.1.617 has more than a dozen mutations.

However, mass elections and religious festivals attended by millions have also been blamed for so-called super-spreader events that infected many people, according to experts.

K Srinath Reddy, President of the Public Health Foundation of India, said it was widespread that the January pandemic was “forever” over.

“It seemed that policymakers, the industry and the public were eager to get back to normal life, get the economy going again and really ignore the threat that was still there,” he told CNBCs ” Capital Connection “last week.

“As I said, we turned our back on the virus, but the virus hasn’t turned its back on us. And now we’re paying the price,” said Reddy.

Do Vaccines Work?

Ugur Sahin, CEO of BioNTech, told CNBC last month that he was “confident” that the company’s vaccine, which was jointly developed with US drug maker Pfizer, would be effective against the Indian variant.

“We had similar double mutants in our previous tests and are confident from the data we had in the past that we could see a similar way of neutralizing this virus,” he said, even though BioNTech did not have sufficient data on B. 1,617 at this point.

The WHO also said preliminary laboratory studies showed that 28 recipients of Covaxin were able to neutralize the B.1.617 variant. Covaxin is a vaccine developed by Bharat Biotech of India and the Indian State Council for Medical Research.

Former White House Director of Health Policy Dr. Kavita Patel said the current vaccines have “some effectiveness” but there have been “breakthrough infections” from variant B.1.617.

“We are very concerned. This is exactly the kind of facility for what we call ‘escape immunity’ – where the variant is so worrying and the body’s immune system cannot fight it,” she told CNBC’s Squawk Box Asia. last week.

– CNBC’s Saheli Roy Choudhury and Berkeley Lovelace Jr. contributed to this report.

Categories
Health

FDA Authorizes Pfizer-BioNTech Vaccine for Kids 12 to 15

Vaccinating children is vital to boost population immunity and contain the spread of the coronavirus. Although children spread the virus less efficiently than adults, they make up about 23 percent of the population.

Experts have said the country is unlikely to reach “herd immunity” – the point where virus transmission essentially comes to a halt – but vaccinating children will be important to get as close as possible .

14-year-old Ty Dropic, one of the study participants, urged others his age to get vaccinated so they can build widespread immunity and protect themselves. He had no side effects, which led him to suspect that he was on the placebo. If this turns out to be the case, he plans to be vaccinated as soon as possible.

“I know it can be scary, but it really isn’t as bad as it seems,” he said. “If you get Covid it will be a lot worse than being stuck with a needle for two seconds.”

Ty’s three siblings, ages 8, 10, and 16, are also participating in vaccination trials for their age groups. Your mother, Dr. Amanda Dropic, a pediatrician in northern Kentucky, said most of the parents in her practice were eager to get their children vaccinated to help them regain some semblance of normalcy.

“The anxiety and depression that we see in children, the social delays, have been enormous,” she said.

Dr. Dropic said her children understood the risks and were willing to volunteer because they saw it as a civic duty. Every drug available today came about because “someone was ready to go first,” she added.

Categories
Health

‘It’s a giant deal’ for America’s push to reopen, says NIH Director on Pfizer vaccine approval for adolescents

The director of the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Francis Collins, called the Food and Drug Administration approval for emergency use of Pfizer and BioNTech’s Covid vaccine for children ages 12-15 as “a big deal” in America’s drive to reopen.

“This is exciting news,” said Collins. “We know that since this pandemic started, one and a half million teenagers have been infected with Covid-19, and not all have been as good as most. And some of them have ended up where they have been with this long Covid We are not doing any better , even weeks or months after the illness, so we really want to protect young people. “

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vaccine Advisory Board has scheduled a meeting on Wednesday to review recordings for children. If approved by the CDC as expected, it could be distributed to teens as early as this week.

More than 44% of all adults in the US are fully vaccinated, and according to the CDC, around 58% have now received at least one dose of the Covid vaccine. The White House aims to increase that number to 70% by July 4th.

Collins told CNBC’s “The News with Shepard Smith” that the US is “on a pretty good path” and that the nation should be able to see CDC regulations to relax indoor masks.

“It’s just about finding the right way to balance the desire not to create another wave. This is the last thing we need right now with the fact that people are really fed up with masks to wear, “said Collins.

Categories
Health

Palliative Care within the ICU: What to Know About Time-Restricted Trials

The team and family agree a certain amount of time to attempt treatment. This can be 24 to 48 hours or a few days, depending on the therapy and the patient’s condition.

The staff then map the particular markers that would show if the patient is improving. Maybe she can breathe, get encouraging blood test results, or regain consciousness with less ventilator assistance. Then she may be able to leave the intensive care unit for hospital care.

“We want to be able to say that we have enough time to see how they are doing,” said Dr. Dong Chang, an intensive care specialist at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center and lead author of the study.

“The only thing we don’t want is to go on indefinitely,” he said. When patients fail to meet set goals, he added, “This is often a sign that they are not getting better – they either die or end up in a state they would not want.” In this case, the family may opt for less aggressive treatment or comfort care.

The Los Angeles study, which enrolled around 200 ICU patients, with an average age of 64, showed how much of a difference this approach can make. Half of the participants were treated before the hospitals adopted time-limited studies. The researchers compared their results with those of patients treated after such studies became standard practice.

Initially, formal family meetings were held for 60 percent of patients to weigh up decisions. After hospitals instituted time-limited studies, nearly 96 percent of families had formal meetings – and they happened much earlier, one day after admitting the patient, rather than five days. The sessions were far more frequent than discussions about the patient’s values ​​and preferences, and the risks and benefits of treatment.

The average length of stay decreased by one day, a significant change. More importantly, the proportion of patients who stayed in intensive care for weeks has fallen sharply, possibly because less invasive treatments were received and more assignments were not resuscitated.

Categories
Health

Hug with ‘care and customary sense,’ Boris Johnson says

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson briefs on the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic during a virtual press conference at 10 Downing Street in central London on March 18, 2021.

Tolga Akmen

LONDON – British Prime Minister Boris Johnson confirmed on Monday that England will move into the next phase of its program to ease the coronavirus lockdown on May 17th.

Indoor facilities such as cinemas and hotels are reopening, but with some capacity constraints. Pubs and restaurants are allowed to welcome customers back indoors, and indoor mixing is allowed to resume for groups of up to six people.

People can also meet outdoors in groups of up to 30 people.

Johnson said the social distancing rules for public spaces remain in place, but people can make their own judgment in private.

When asked about the hug, Johnson said at a news conference Monday, “People should do it when they see fit, when they think the risks are very, very small.”

“But you should use care and common sense. And people who are not vaccinated must have a clearly higher risk of transmission than those who have been vaccinated,” he added.

Johnson has been heavily criticized for the initial response to the coronavirus pandemic. With more than 127,000 reported deaths, the UK has one of the worst death rates in Europe and the world.

But Johnson has also been at the forefront of a successful vaccination campaign that saw more than 50% of the country’s population receive at least one dose of vaccine.

International travel can be resumed next Monday in most cases, although quarantines and testing would for the most part be required upon return to the UK. The government hopes to lift all restrictions on social contact by June 21st.

Around noon on Monday, UK chief medical officers agreed to lower the country’s Covid-19 alert level from 4 – meaning transmission is high or increasing exponentially – to level 3, meaning the epidemic is in general circulation.

– CNBC’s Holly Ellyatt contributed to this article.

Categories
Health

The Pandemic Has Modified Their Bathe Habits. How About Yours?

Robin Harper, an administrative assistant at a Martha’s Vineyard preschool, grew up taking a shower every day.

“It’s what you did,” she said. But when the coronavirus pandemic kept her indoors and out of the public eye, she started showering once a week.

The new practice felt environmentally virtuous, practical, and liberating. And it stayed.

“Don’t get me wrong,” said Ms. Harper, 43, who has returned to work. “I like showers. But it’s an off my plate thing. I am a mother. I work full time and there is one less thing to do. “

Parents have complained that their teenage children don’t take daily showers. After the UK media reported a YouGov poll found that 17 percent of Brits had given up daily showers during the pandemic, many Twitter users said they did the same.

Heather Whaley, a writer in Redding, Connecticut, said her shower use fell 20 percent over the past year.

After the pandemic forced her to lock her up, Ms. Whaley, 49, said she started thinking about why she showered every day.

“Do I? I want you to say.” Taking a shower was less a question of function than a question of doing something for myself that I enjoyed. “

Ms. Harper, who still uses deodorant and washes “the parts that need to be done” at the sink daily, said she was confident she was not offending anyone. Her 22-year-old daughter, who takes a demanding bath and shower twice a day, did not comment on her new hygiene habit. Still have the children in their school.

“The kids will tell you if you don’t smell good,” said Ms. Harper, “3-, 4-, and 5-year-olds will tell you the truth.”

Daily showers are a fairly new phenomenon, said Donnachadh McCarthy, a London environmentalist and writer who grew up taking weekly baths.

“We had a bath once a week and washed at the sink the rest of the week – under our armpits and our private lives – and that was it,” said 61-year-old McCarthy.

As he got older, he showered every day. But after a visit to the Amazon jungle in 1992 exposed the ravages of overdevelopment, McCarthy said he pondered how his daily habits affect the environment and his own body.

“It’s not really good to wash with soap every day,” said Mr. McCarthy, who showered once a week.

Doctors and health experts have said that daily showers are unnecessary and even counterproductive. Washing with soap daily can rid the skin of its natural oils and make it feel dry, although doctors still recommend frequent hand washing.

The American obsession with cleaning began around the turn of the 20th century when people moved to cities after the Industrial Revolution, said Dr. James Hamblin, professor at Yale University and author of Clean: The New Science of Skin and the Beauty of Doing Less. “

Cities were dirtier, making residents feel like they had to wash more often, said Dr. Hamblin, and soap making became more common. Indoor plumbing also improved, giving the middle class better access to running water.

To stand out from the crowd, wealthy people started investing in fancier soaps and shampoos and bathing more often, he said.

“It became a kind of arms race,” said Dr. Hamblin. “It was a token of wealth to look like you could bathe every day.”

Kelly Mieloch, 42, said she’d only showered “every few days” since the pandemic began.

What’s the point of showering every day if she rarely leaves home to run errands like taking her 6-year-old daughter to school?

“You don’t smell me – you don’t know what’s happening,” said Ms. Mieloch. “Most of the time, I don’t even wear a bra.”

In addition, she said her decision to quit daily showers helped her appearance.

“I just feel like my hair is better, my skin is better, and my face isn’t as dry,” said Ms. Mieloch, an Asheville, NC mortgage lender

Andrea Armstrong, an assistant professor of environmental science and studies at Lafayette College in Easton, Pa., Said she was encouraged as more people rethink their daily shower.

An eight-minute shower uses up to 17 gallons of water, according to the Water Research Fund. Running water uses as much energy as running a 60-watt light bulb for 14 hours for five minutes, according to the Environmental Protection Agency. And frequent washing means going through more plastic bottles and using more soap, which is often made from petroleum.

The individual decision to stop showering or bathing every day is an important decision at a time when environmentalists are urging countries to take more action against climate change, said environmentalist McCarthy.

“There’s nothing like bathing in a deep, warm bath,” he said. “It’s a joy that I absolutely accept and understand. But I keep these joys as rewards. “

However, Professor Armstrong said large numbers of people would need to change their bathing habits to improve carbon emissions. To make a real impact, local and federal governments need to invest in infrastructure that makes showering and water use generally less polluting.

“It pains me to think about fracking every time I shower and use my water heater at home,” said Professor Armstrong. “I’m in Pennsylvania. There is not much choice. “

Despite the compelling science, it’s hard to imagine that Americans as a whole rarely shower and bathe, said Lori Brown, a professor of sociology at Meredith College in Raleigh, NC

“We’ve been told so much about it that we can’t smell and buy products,” she said. “You are dealing with culture. You’re not into biology. You can tell people all day that this is of no use to them, and there will still be people who say, “I don’t care. I will take a shower.'”

Nina Arthur, who owns Ninas Hair Care in Flint, Michigan, said she had many clients who were menopausal and felt so uncomfortable they felt like they had to shower twice a day.

“I’ve had women who have hot flashes in my stool,” she said.

One client was sweating so badly that she asked Ms. Arthur to come up with a hairstyle that could withstand constant sweat.

The pandemic has not affected the bathing habits of such clients, Ms Arthur said.

“When you have menopause, the smells are really different,” she said. “They are not your normal smells. I don’t think there is a woman who would want that smell on her. “

Ms. Arthur, 52, said she understood the environmental argument for fewer showers, but it wouldn’t encourage her to change her bathing habits.

“No,” she said. “I’m not that woman.”

Susan Beachy contributed to the research.

Categories
Health

Psychedelic drug increase in psychological well being remedy nears actuality

Magic mushrooms are seen in a grow room in the Netherlands in this 2007 file photo.

Peter Dejong | AP

Entrepreneur Dick Simon has never shied away from speaking up about business topics other CEOs might find too stigmatized to touch. He has spent years dedicated to improving U.S. business relations with Iran, and more recently, the Boston-based CEO has embraced another passion: improving the market for and medical community’s understanding of how psychedelic drugs can be used to treat mental illness. It’s a health, and emerging health business, that Simon came to appreciate through the firsthand frustration of watching people in his life suffering — not just from mental illness, but from the failure of existing and costly medical treatments.

Drugs long stigmatized, such as psilocybin and MDMA, are rising in profile as mental illness treatment options. Just last week, results from a phase 3 trial of MDMA combined with talk therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder showed results that were impressive.

“This is a pivotal event,” said Elemer Piros, a biotech analyst at Roth Capital Partners who covers the emerging alternative mental health treatment space. “It may not seem humongous, but it is one of the best and most rigorously executed trials in the space. And the results corroborate what we have seen time and time again from smaller studies over the past two decades,” he said, referencing remission rates double that of a placebo. “The magical experiences kept showing up, but no one had the courage to take it through to regulators.”

Join CNBC’s Healthy Returns Summit on May 11

The annual Healthy Returns Summit is on Tuesday, May 11. Meg Tirrell speaks with CDC’s Dr. Rochelle Walensky, Pfizer’s head of vaccine R&D, and Eli Lilly CEO David Ricks. Bertha Coombs talks mental health care with Centene CEO Michael Neidorff and dives into the future of telehealth with Teladoc CEO Jason Gorevic. Jim Cramer closes the day with Abbott CEO Robert Ford. Register now.

The results of the MDMA study, whose senior author is Rick Doblin, Ph.D., founder and executive director of the Multidisciplinary Association for Psychedelic Studies (MAPS), are expected to be published in Nature Medicine on Monday and FDA approval could come by 2023, according to a New York Times report.

A recent Imperial College London study of psilocybin use in depression reported in The New England Journal of Medicine also produced positive results. Before the end of the year, clinical results also are expected from a study involving Compass Pathways — which IPO’d late last year — using its approach of guided psilocybin experiences as a treatment for drug-resistant depression.

“People still believe that ‘your brain on drugs’ commercial is the truth rather than all scientific evidence on major therapeutic benefits,” said Simon, who heads the Psychedelic Medicines for Mental Health Group at entrepreneurial network YPO and also serves on an advisory council at Mass General Hospital on the topic. (Dr. Sharmin Ghaznavi, Mass General Hospital Assoc. Director, Center for the Neuroscience of Psychedelics, will speak at the CNBC Healthy Returns Summit on Tuesday, May 11.)

A focus on depression treatment outcomes

There are example of stigmatized drugs in FDA-approved medical usage, ketamine, for example, as an anesthesia since the 1970s, and ultimately, used on an “off-label” basis to treat depression based on the existing FDA authorization. In 2019, a Johnson & Johnson ketamine-derived treatment for drug-resistant depression was the first new approach for the mental health condition specifically approved by the FDA in decades.

The current treatment approach of helping people to live with depression and PTSD, and on medication, creates a patient population and cost factor that is a burden on the health-care system. That may ultimately help the new drug companies gain acceptance if the clinical trials results continue to be positive.

A close friend of Simon’s almost lost a child suffering from mental illness. The individual was looking at a prognosis of never going back to school, never being able to work, at best not being a danger to themselves with medication. “That was not a prognosis you want for a 20-year-old,” he said. “They had tried everything, and eventually out of complete desperation, they started learning about the potential for psychedelic-assisted therapies, and it worked,” he told CNBC in an interview conducted late last year.

Now, he says, that person is off medication, in a relationship and leading a normal professional life.

Mental illness is among the most costly medical expenses in the U.S., and it has a high cost to employers in lost productivity. In 2019, 51.5 million adults were living with a mental illness in the U.S., and the number of people suffering and drug costs, already in the tens of billions of dollars annually, are projected to grow in the years ahead, with Covid-19 compounding mental health issues globally.

Roughly 7% of Americans suffer depressive episodes annually, and roughly 1% are resistant to treatment, the latter associated with a significantly higher economic burden including hospitalization. Americans who suffer depressive episodes have additional bouts within 2-5 years at a rate exceeding 40%, according to a recent Cowen & Company research report on Compass Pathways, and that risk increases with each new depressive episode.

“Covid has done a lot of terrible things, but it has elevated mental health visibility, and as a result of that there is lots of interest,” Simon said.

Public vs. professional acceptance of illegal drugs

Denver became the first city in the U.S. to decriminalize psychedelic mushrooms in 2019, and in a 2020 ballot measure, voters in Oregon made it the first state to decriminalize mushrooms and legalize them for treatment purposes. But investors behind the new drug treatment approaches are not focused on public acceptance, the trend of microdosing (for which they say data remains slim) or consumer recreational market potential, though many do find ideas about these drugs to be outdated.

“Consciousness is not the key here,” Simon said. “For purely medical use, there is a tremendous amount of data and traction for expanding use, which is where I’m focused.”

One of the biggest investors in the emerging field is Atai Life Sciences, a holding company for multiple biotech start-ups pursuing alternative treatments for depression, anxiety and addiction based on stigmatized drugs, and backed by venture capitalist Peter Thiel. It recently filed for an IPO.

Atai’s chairman Christian Angermayer — who says he has never touched a beer even though he comes from Bavaria where it is “our daily nutrition,” or smoked a joint or cigarette — is a personal believer in the power of psychedelics to have a positive influence on life. He described his first experience with psychedelics as “the single most meaningful thing” in his life.

“Nothing else even comes close,” Angermayer told CNBC in an interview conducted late last year.

But his personal experience is distinct from his role as an investor and executive focused on the mental health market needs. Angermayer was an early investor in Compass Pathways, where one of the founders, Lars Christian Wilde, suffered from drug-resistant depression and found help in psychedelics.

“We want to bring it back to the legal realm, but in the shamanistic setting of today, and that is with a therapist. We want to make it legal, but solely for doctors or psychotherapists in a clinical setting,” said Angermayer, who will speak at CNBC Healthy Returns on Tuesday. “These are not drugs you can take alone and not everyone can afford to go to the Amazon and see a shaman. We need to bring it into the medical system.”

Investment risks

A common thread among those closely watching, and investing in this space, is the personal experience with family and friends suffering from mental illness and struggling to find a successful medical treatment. “These people have been suffering for decades,” said Piros, who has a family member now struggling with depression and who has not yet found an effective medical therapy.

The new companies come with a high level of investment risk, common in the biotech space, with early trials showing promise but the business generating no revenue today. Advocates and investors in these alternative drug treatments say the economic argument is compelling when compared to current options.

Piros, who has spent more than two decades analyzing biotech companies, says investors need to be mindful that when you get involved with a development stage company it is not about the money being made already, but factors including how long the companies will have IP protection, when they can be expected to enter the market, and potential cash flows over a period between a decade to 15 years.

I’m not a medical professional or a researcher, but as a CEO and entrepreneur, I’m someone who is used to making things happen.

Dick Simon, heads the Psychedelic Medicines for Mental Health Group at entrepreneurial network YPO

Unlike biotechs working with brand new compounds which have a failure rate as high as 90%, the trials using psychedelic drugs that have been studied for decades are less likely to result in outright failures. Still, Piros said that the proper way to think about this new theme is as part of an existing investment risk tolerance for the biotech sector, and these new drugs should be no more than 10% of that existing allocation.

“It’s not chronic medicine, which as a business model is reasonably predictable and a great business model. It remains to be seen how this business model works, but … if we only need treatment for depression twice a year to be in remission that is a thousand times better than anything we can offer today, and PTSD has no approved drug,” Piros said. “It’s not like a crapshoot anymore.”

If a company like Compass makes it to market, its treatment approach could reach millions of Americans — estimates range from roughly 2 million to 4 million — not being served well by the current class of depression drugs. Pricing of the treatment could be $10,000, according to Cowen estimates, or as high as a $20,000, according to Piros, which he said is closer to the cost of current treatments. Depending on the number of patients who are resistant to current drugs that the therapy reaches, a 5%-7% market share could be worth billions. According to a Cowen estimate, $1 billion in annual sales; according to Berenberg Capital Markets, more than $2.5 billion; and according to Piros, possibly as much as $5 billion for a new, successful entrant at peak.

“We don’t expect 5% penetration two years after launch, more like five to seven years after launch, and going beyond 5% is crazy. But that is still a very large chunk of value,” Piros said. “We don’t need to go to the consumer angle.”

Many factors would influence the overall size of the market, from patients who are designated as good candidates for the new treatments, to the number of treatments needed, the infrastructure required for the guided sessions, which need to be in controlled environments like existing treatment centers that currently administer ketamine, and physician acceptance. Compass is creating 100 centers to train medical professionals and offer guided therapy, and plans to grow to 3,800 centers in a peak year.

Medical resistance

Getting the medical establishment to embrace these treatments may be among the most difficult parts of the journey. Piros said he has discussed alternative treatments with psychiatrists on behalf of his family, but they told him they would not be interested until there are decades of placebo-controlled trial data behind the drugs. “These were young doctors, fully up to date on the latest trials and literature. It’s going to be a long road before full acceptance.”

Cowen expects the existing anti-depression drugs in the SSRI (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor) class, which account for upwards of 75% of prescriptions, to remain the first line of choice in therapy, but its analysts also wrote in a recent report that surveying and interviews it has conducted with doctors indicate roughly 30% of patients are resistant to these drugs and as many as 1 in 4 patients might be considered for new treatment alternatives.

The executives in the field know the history, and even with seven decades of research into use of psychedelics culminating in the latest, more rigorous work, they expect continued resistance. But they are determined, and now with a growing body of clinical trial data to back up psychedelics.

“There are those who have been out there in the wilderness metaphorically, major institutions carrying on research over the last decade. How do I help them get past the stigma society still has around this work?” Simon asked. “How do you get veterans groups who don’t like the fact that 22 veterans a day commit suicide, and each year more die in suicide than in all wars since 9/11, how do you engage them, across the political spectrum? I’m not a medical professional or researcher, but as a CEO and entrepreneur, I’m someone who is used to making things happen.”

After his initial psychedelic trip, Angermayer said the first thought he had was that he needed to call his parents and tell them how much he loved them. The second thought: “This must be legal as a treatment. … We’re several years away. It’s not tomorrow, but it’s not in ten years,” he said. 

If you are having thoughts of suicide, call the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline at 1-800-273-8255 (TALK) or go to SpeakingOfSuicide.com/resources for a list of additional resources.

For more exclusive insights from our reporters and speakers, sign up for our Healthy Returns newsletter to get the latest delivered straight to your inbox weekly. For a front row seat at CNBC Events, you can hear directly from the visionary executives, innovators, leaders and influencers taking the stage in “The Keynote Podcast.” Listen now, however you get your podcasts.

Categories
Health

Do Statins Actually Trigger Muscle Aches?

Many people who take the cholesterol lowering statin drugs report that they cause muscle pain. However, one randomized study suggests that the pain is no different when taking a placebo pill.

In rare cases, statins have been known to cause a serious muscle condition called rhabdomyolysis, which destroys skeletal muscle tissue, leading to serious complications. But much more often, people complain that the drugs simply cause muscle pain.

However, it remains uncertain whether statins are responsible for the muscle pain. Muscle pain has many causes and is common in the older age group using statins. Therefore, it is not easy to determine if statins are causing the pain. Results of observational studies, as well as many media reports, may have led some to unnecessarily abandon potentially life-saving treatment.

This new study, published in the BMJ, included a series of so-called n-of-1 studies, a method that allows researchers to examine the results of treatment and placebo in individual patients rather than examining them as a group. In fact, each patient serves as their own control.

Recognition…Mike Mergen for the New York Times

The researchers gathered 200 people in England and Wales who had either stopped taking statins because of excruciating muscle pain or were about to stop. For a year, each patient took either a statin or a placebo pill at random over a period of six two months. Half the time they were given 20 milligrams of Lipitor and the other half they were given a similar dummy pill. By the end of the study, neither the researchers nor the patients knew when to take the statin and when to take the placebo.

For the last seven days of each two-month phase, researchers measured each patient’s pain daily using a validated 10-point visual pain scale, with 10 indicating the worst pain. They also tracked other aspects of daily life, including the patient’s general level of activity, mood, walking comfort, ability to engage in normal work activities, social relationships, sleep, and enjoyment of life.

The study found no differences between statin and placebo periods in muscle pain or reports of activities and moods in daily life. Nine percent withdrew because of pain while taking statins, but seven percent who took placebos also withdrew, an insignificant difference.

“These studies are difficult to conduct,” said Dr. Henry N. Ginsberg, professor of medicine at Columbia University who was not involved in the work. “This one is done as well as possible and it’s nice to talk to patients about it. You can tell your patients, “They did studies on people like you and those people couldn’t tell the difference between placebo and medicine.”

Three months after the last treatment, when the patients were informed of their results, The researchers asked them whether they had or planned to restart statins and whether they found their own test result helpful in their decision. Most patients said the study was helpful, and more than two-thirds said they intended to start taking statins again.

The lead author, Dr. Liam Smeeth, general practitioner and professor of clinical epidemiology at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, said that when people stop taking statins for muscle pain, “they miss the tremendous benefits – reducing the risk of a heart attack or stroke by about a third.” What we have shown is that among these people who gave up their medicine because of pain – and their pain was real – statins did not make it worse. “

Categories
Health

Singapore’s overseas minister says Covid will not go away fully

Crowds thronged Singapore’s Orchard Road shopping belt to prepare for the festive season on December 12, 2020 amid the Covid-19 pandemic.

Zakaria Zainal | Anadolu Agency | Getty Images

SINGAPORE – Covid-19 is “permanent” and subsequent waves of infection will occur normally in the coming years, Singapore Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan told CNBC.

“Covid-19 is endemic to humanity, which means it will never go away completely,” Balakrishnan told CNBC’s Squawk Box Asia on Monday.

“And the reason it won’t go away completely is because it’s spread around the world, has sufficient critical mass, the rate of mutations and new variants continues, and the level of human immunity increases and decreases as well,” said he said.

The minister, who was a doctor before entering politics, also warned that now could be a “more dangerous time” for vaccinated people who might be complacent, as well as those who are not vaccinated and have no protection against Covid.

Balakrishnan said vaccination is critical and that people who have received Covid shots develop fewer symptoms and have fewer serious illnesses, even when infected. However, vaccination alone is not the panacea for an “exponential explosion” in Covid cases.

That means measures such as social distancing and border restrictions may have to “come and go” in response to waves of Covid infection over the next two years, the minister said.

Singapore tightened social restrictions over the weekend after the number of cases increased in the community. Cumulatively, the country confirmed more than 61,300 cases and 31 deaths on Sunday, data from the Ministry of Health showed.

Balakrishnan said around 20% of Singapore’s population has been vaccinated, but the government has no defined threshold for achieving “herd immunity”. He explained that with the emergence of new variants of Covid, the level of protection required in a community will change so that the disease no longer spreads quickly.

It is likely that immunity to vaccinations will also decrease over time. So the point is, you can’t wait to say that you have reached the magical figure and suddenly you are immune and the mask has taken off and there are no restrictions.

Vivian Balakrishnan

Singapore’s Foreign Minister

“As new variants evolve and these new variants actually appear to be more contagious than the original strain, the level of herd immunity will mathematically change,” Balakrishnan said.

“It’s likely that immunity to vaccinations will also wear off over time. So the point is, you can’t expect to have reached the magical figure and suddenly be immune and mask off and not have any restrictions,” said he added.

Singapore-Hong Kong travel bubble

Singapore is a Southeast Asian city-state with no domestic air travel market. The country has reached an agreement with Hong Kong – a city that also has no domestic flight market – to create a travel bubble that will allow travelers to skip the quarantine.

When CNBC asked if the program should start on May 26th, Balakrishnan said, “As of now, the plan is yes, but we have to see how the situation develops over the next few days.”

The launch of the air travel bubble – originally scheduled for November 2020 – has been postponed several times after a surge in coronavirus cases in Hong Kong.

The two cities announced last month that the program will begin with one flight per day to each city with up to 200 travelers per flight.